KR102032646B1 - Cost-effectiveness and optimized test design method and apparatus of mass production weapon system Environmental stress screening - Google Patents
Cost-effectiveness and optimized test design method and apparatus of mass production weapon system Environmental stress screening Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR102032646B1 KR102032646B1 KR1020180038532A KR20180038532A KR102032646B1 KR 102032646 B1 KR102032646 B1 KR 102032646B1 KR 1020180038532 A KR1020180038532 A KR 1020180038532A KR 20180038532 A KR20180038532 A KR 20180038532A KR 102032646 B1 KR102032646 B1 KR 102032646B1
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- environmental load
- screening test
- total
- cost
- temperature
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G06F17/5086—
-
- G06F2217/16—
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to an optimal design method and apparatus for cost effectiveness of environmental load screening test, according to an aspect of the present invention, the target residual defect density (D Remain (Goal) ), the temperature maintenance interval of the environmental load screening test profile ( calculating an allowable temperature range (ΔT) such that the total required time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test is minimized based on the constant t, the temperature change rate (ΔR), and the vibration magnitude (ΔG). Including, environmental cost screening test cost effectiveness is also provided an optimal design method.
Description
The present invention relates to a cost-effective optimal design method and apparatus for mass production weapon system environmental load screening test.
Numerous defects are introduced into the weapon system manufacturing process due to the numerous production technologies and various process environments that are used to manufacture modern weapon systems. In order to minimize such initial defects, environmental load screening tests should be conducted to detect, eliminate, and improve defects introduced during the production of weapon systems using environmental loads (temperature, vibration).
Most of the electronic equipment-oriented mass production weapon systems manufactured in Korea are manufactured by mid-sized and small companies to supply system companies (large companies) or directly to the government. Due to the difficulty in designing quantitative environmental load screening test and high test cost in order to minimize the initial failure in the medium- and medium-sized enterprises with limited human resources, it is limited to conduct environmental load screening test.
In order to alleviate the difficulty of quantitative environmental load screening test design based on MIL-HDBK-344, the user can provide an optimal design for the cost effectiveness of environmental load screening test with only one input variable (temperature range). In addition, it is possible to provide optimal control of the cost / time required for environmental load screening testing.
An object of the present invention is to solve the problem of providing an optimal design method and apparatus for cost effective testing of environmental load screening test for electronic equipment-oriented mass production weapon system.
In addition, the present invention is the effect of the environmental load screening test cost effect that can be optimally managed and the cost / time required for the environmental load screening test with the only one input variable (temperature range) to the user's desired cost of environmental load screening test Another object of the present invention is to provide an optimal design method and apparatus.
In order to solve the above problems, according to an aspect of the present invention, the target residual defect density (D Remain (Goal) ), the temperature maintenance interval (t constant ) of the environmental load screening test profile, temperature change rate (ΔR), and Based on the vibration magnitude (ΔG), calculating the allowable temperature range (ΔT) such that the total required time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test is minimized, the cost-effectiveness ratio of the environmental load screening test An optimal design method is provided.
In addition, the total time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test can be determined by the following general formula (1).
[Formula 1]
In
In addition, the temperature load application cycle number n cycle may be determined by
[Formula 2]
In general formula (2), PE represents induction efficiency.
In addition, the vibration load application time t vib may be determined by the following general formula (3).
[Formula 3]
In general formula (3), F represents the weighting factor (series: 1, parallel: 1.18) according to the test type.
In addition, the induction efficiency (PE) may be determined by the following general formula (4).
[Formula 4]
In Equation 4, DE represents the detection efficiency, D Lat is latent defect, D Pat is obvious defect, and D Remain (Goal) represents the target residual defect density.
In addition, the total time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test can be determined by the following general formula (5).
[Formula 5]
In Equation 6, the temperature change rate ΔR and the vibration magnitude ΔG may be determined as the maximum temperature change rate and the maximum vibration magnitude, respectively.
In addition, the cycle-based minimum test time closest to the theoretical minimum value calculated by Equation 6 based on the maximum temperature change rate and the maximum vibration magnitude may be selected as the total time required for the environmental load screening test (t Total ).
In addition, the detection efficiency DE may be determined by the product of the test type, the environmental conditions during the test, and the bond discovery / removal capability.
In addition, the method may further include generating a temperature change graph according to the time required for the environmental load screening test (t Total ), but the temperature change graph may be generated to include a temperature unchanged section between the temperature rising section and the temperature falling section. have.
Further, according to another aspect of the invention, determining the input defect density (D In ), the target residual defect density (D Remain (Goal) ), and the temperature maintenance interval (t constant ); Determining a defect detection efficiency (DE temp ) of the temperature load and a defect detection efficiency (DE vib ) of the vibration load according to the manufacturing capability of the mass production weapon system; And an allowable temperature range (ΔT) such that the total required time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test is minimized based on the temperature change rate (ΔR) and vibration magnitude (ΔG) of the environmental load screening test profile. An optimal design method is also provided for the cost effectiveness of environmental load screening tests, including the step of calculating.
Further, the temperature change rate ΔR and the vibration magnitude ΔG may be determined as the maximum temperature change rate and the maximum vibration magnitude, respectively.
In addition, according to another aspect of the invention, the input unit for inputting the input defect density (D In ), the target residual defect density (D Remain (Goal) ), the temperature maintenance interval (t constant ), respectively; And an allowable temperature range (ΔT) such that the total required time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test is minimized based on the temperature change rate (ΔR) and vibration magnitude (ΔG) of the environmental load screening test profile. An optimum design apparatus for cost-effectiveness of the environmental load screening test including a calculation unit for calculating is provided.
The apparatus may further include a profile generator for generating an environmental load screening test profile based on a total time (t Total ), a temperature change rate (ΔR), and an allowable temperature range (ΔT) of the environmental load screening test. It may include a display unit for displaying the generated profile.
As described above, the optimum design method and apparatus for the cost-effectiveness of the environmental load screening test according to the embodiment of the present invention has the following effects.
With only one input variable (temperature range), the cost-effectiveness of the environmental load screening test desired by the user can be optimally managed and the cost / time required for the environmental load screening test can be optimized.
1 is a block diagram showing the relationship between environmental load screening test variables.
2 is a table showing the detection efficiency parameters.
3 is a table showing the determinants of induction efficiency according to process capability.
It is a table which shows the comparison result of environmental load screening test effect diagram.
5 is a graph showing a comparison of environmental load screening test effects applied by load.
6 is a table showing parameter information.
7 is a flowchart illustrating an optimal design method algorithm for cost effectiveness of environmental load screening test.
8 is a table showing environmental load screening test models and parameters according to load types.
9 is a temperature and vibration range based environmental load screening test time graph calculated according to FIG.
FIG. 10 is a graph of environmental load screening test contours calculated according to FIG. 7. FIG.
FIG. 11 is a graphical representation of environmental load screening test calculated according to FIG. 7. FIG.
12 is a graph of environmental load screening test profiles calculated according to FIG. 7.
Hereinafter, the cost-effectiveness of the environmental load screening test according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and the optimum design method and apparatus.
In addition, irrespective of the reference numerals, the same or corresponding components will be given the same or similar reference numerals, and redundant description thereof will be omitted. For convenience of description, the size and shape of each component member may be exaggerated or reduced. Can be.
In this document, an environmental stress screening (ESS) test is a series of processes that generate environmental impacts such as temperature cycles or vibrations, and is a test to cause potential defects that cause mechanical and electronic composite equipment failures. Due to the numerous production technologies and various process environments applied to modern weapon systems, various defects are introduced into the weapon system manufacturing process.
In this way, defects entering the manufacturing process can be detected through existing quality control procedures such as visual inspection and functional tests, and "potential defects" that are limited by the existing quality control methods due to the complexity of the weapon system and the manufacturing process. There are two kinds. Among these two defects, some “obvious defects” and “potential defects” that were not detected in the production process are left in the weapons system, and these defects cause problems early in the operation of the weapons system.
To minimize this early defect problem, the use of environmental factors, such as temperature cycles or vibrations, in parts / components / finished products during the production process of the weapons system, can initially trigger “clear and latent defects” and detect defects. Can be removed and improved.
1 is a block diagram showing the relationship between environmental load screening test variables.
First, the input defect density (D In ) is composed of parameters of apparent defect (D Pat ) and latent defect (D Lat ), and means defects introduced during the product process. In addition, the input coupling density may be determined by the sum of the apparent defect (D Pat ) and the latent defect (D Lat ) (D In = clear defect (D Pat ) + latent defect (D Lat )). For example, according to the definition of MIL-HDBK-344, the ratio of the explicit and latent bonds of the input bond density may be determined to be 50% each.
FIG. 2 is a table showing determination parameters of detection efficiency according to process capability, and FIG. 3 is a table showing induction efficiency parameters.
Environmental load screening tests are detectable states that induce defect detection efficiency (DE) and potential defects in the form of obvious defects, which are defined as a measure of the ability to detect and eliminate obvious defects entering complex electronic equipment through environmental load screening tests. It is expressed as a defect induction efficiency (PE) defined as a measure that can be made. The defect detection efficiency (DE) for detecting and eliminating apparent defects can be determined by the product of the type of inspection, the environmental conditions under inspection, and the ability to find / remove bonds.
The detection induction efficiency (PE) that induces potential defects in the form of obvious defects and makes them detectable can be divided according to the temperature load and vibration load as a function of the load duration, and the induction efficiency (PE Temp ) for the temperature load is Same as the general formula (6).
[Formula 6]
Referring to Figure 3, k is determined according to the temperature load type, ncycle is the number of cycles of the temperature load application.
Induction efficiency (PE Vib ) with respect to the vibration load is shown in the general formula (7).
[Formula 7]
In Equation 7, t vib is the vibration load application time in minutes, k is the vibration load type, and F is a weighting factor, which is 1 when the temperature load and the vibration load are performed in series in the environmental load screening test. 1.18 if 'Environmental load screening test result' is the residual defect density (D Remain ), which is not eliminated through the environmental load screening test and still remains in the electronic equipment, and is represented by Equation 8 below.
[Formula 8]
In addition, when the defect density removed through the environmental load screening test is the removal defect density (D Remove ), it is represented by the following general formula (9).
[Formula 9]
Meanwhile, the environmental load screening cost model (SC ST ) may be applied to optimize the environmental load screening mass production reliability test cost.
[Formula 10]
Where EC is the cost of equipment, SC1 is the cost of a complex electronics environmental load screening test procedure, CS is the cost of investigation and analysis, and FC is the cost of failure to detect a defect. In the environmental load screening cost model of
[Formula 11]
Where SC L is labor cost and SC A is management cost, and the minimum test time can be minimized if the minimum time for environmental load screening test is calculated.
4 is a table showing a comparison result of the environmental load screening test effect diagram applied load, Figure 5 is a graph showing a comparison of the environmental load screening test effect diagram. FIG. 5 (a) is a comparison graph of periodic temperature / constant temperature, and FIG. 5 (b) is a comparison graph of random vibration, swamp sine vibration, and fixed sine vibration.
In order to minimize the test cost, the environmental load screening test time (t total ) should be minimized, and the minimum test time can be secured by applying temperature load type (Temperature Cycling) and vibration load type (Random Vibration). 4 and 5.
According to one aspect of the invention, based on the target residual defect density (D Remain (Goal) ), the temperature maintenance interval (t constant ) of the environmental load screening test profile, the temperature change rate (△ R), and vibration magnitude (△ G) Thus, an optimal design method is also provided for the cost effectiveness of the environmental load screening test, comprising calculating an allowable temperature range ΔT such that the total required time t Total of the environmental load screening test is minimized.
In addition, the total time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test can be determined by the following general formula (1).
[Formula 1]
In
In addition, the temperature load application cycle number n cycle may be determined by
[Formula 2]
In general formula (2), PE represents induction efficiency.
In addition, the vibration load application time t vib may be determined by the following general formula (3).
[Formula 3]
In general formula (3), F represents the weighting factor (series: 1, parallel: 1.18) according to the test type.
In addition, the induction efficiency (PE) may be determined by the following general formula (4).
[Formula 4]
In Equation 4, DE represents the detection efficiency, D LAT is latent defect, D PAT is obvious defect, and D Remain (Goal) represents the target residual defect density.
In addition, the total time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test can be determined by the following general formula (5).
[Formula 5]
In
In addition, the cycle-based minimum test time closest to the theoretical minimum value calculated by
FIG. 6 is a table showing parameter information, and FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an optimum design method for cost effectiveness of environmental load screening test.
Design of complex electronic equipment Optimized cost-effective load through independent variable temperature range (△ T)) under maximum permissible temperature change rate (R product (Maximum) ) and permissible maximum vibration magnitude ((G product (Maximum) )) The total duration of the screening test (t total ) can be obtained. The predefined variables for performing the optimal design method for the cost-effectiveness of the proposed environmental load screening test are shown in FIG. 6, and the exemplary overall algorithm structure is shown in FIG. 7.
8 is a table showing environmental load screening test models and parameters according to load types.
The validation scenario for the optimal design method for the cost-effectiveness of the environmental load screening test proposed in the present patent is shown in FIG. 8.
9 is a temperature and vibration range based environmental load screening test time graph calculated according to FIG.
The first step for the design of environmental load screening tests is the production of complex electronic equipment defect densities or complex electronic equipment produced from a failure reporting analysis and corrective action system (FRACAS) in the quality management operating system of a complex electronic equipment manufacturer. Calculate the applied input density (eg D In = 10). Next, the target residual defect density selection (D Remain = D In x 0.3) and the temperature holding interval (in minutes) (t constant = 5 min) are selected for how to remove the defect density introduced into the production complex electronic equipment.
The second step is to select the variable value according to the load type, and in case of defect detection efficiency of temperature and vibration load, select it according to the manufacturing capability of the mass production complex electronic equipment manufacturer (DE temp = 0.9, DE vib = 0.9), The temperature change rate (△ R = 0 ~ 10 ℃ / min), allowable temperature range (△ T = 0 ~ 150 ℃), and allowable vibration size (△ G = 0 ~ 15Grms) are defined.
Finally, the temperature load and vibration load are applied simultaneously (F = 1.18) during the environmental load screening test. Prior independent variable temperature range for each of the variables described (△? T = △? T product) determine the vibration amplitude (G = G product) based on the
10 is an environmental load screening test contour graph calculated according to FIG. 7, FIG. 11 is an environmental load screening test contour graph calculated according to FIG. 7, and FIG. 12 is an environmental load screening test profile graph calculated according to FIG. 7. .
Mass production complex electronic equipment The total time required for the environmental load screening test according to the temperature range for the maximum allowable vibration load (G product (Maximum) = 15 Grms) is shown in FIGS. 10 and 11.
Environmental load screening test according to the temperature range and vibration size The total time required contour results are shown in Figure 10, the maximum vibration load (G product (Maximum) = 15 Grms) application based temperature range (△? T = △? T product (Gprodunt = 15 Grms) ) according to the environmental load screening test total time (t total ) results are shown in FIG.
Theoretical minimum value ( expression : *) (min t total ( Gproduct = 15 Grms ) , 0 = Δ? T product ( Gprodunt = 15 Grms ) = 150) The test time is 176.6 minutes. In general, when designing the environmental load screening test profile consisting of the cycle type to the theoretical minimum value, there is a limitation in the configuration of the cycle type profile. Therefore, the environmental load screening test profile should be selected according to the cycle. ) Is shown in FIG. 11. Under these constraints, a cycle-based test time (indicated as □) with a minimum residual value between the theoretical minimum test time and the cycle-based test time (indicator: □) (5 cycles / test time: 177 minutes). Through this process, it is possible to calculate the optimal designed test profile for the cost-effectiveness of mass production complex electronic equipment environmental load screening test as shown in FIG. 12.
Specifically, the method may further include generating a temperature change graph according to the time required for the environmental load screening test (t Total ). Referring to FIG. 12, between the temperature rising section and the temperature falling section, the temperature unchanging section may be included. A graph of temperature change can be generated.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention described above are disclosed for purposes of illustration, and those skilled in the art having various ordinary knowledge of the present invention will be able to make various modifications, changes, and additions within the spirit and scope of the present invention. And additions should be considered to be within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (14)
The total design time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test is determined by Equation 1 below.
[Formula 1]
In Equation 1, n cycle represents the number of cycles of temperature load application, and t vib represents the vibration load application time.
The number of cycles for applying the temperature load (n cycle ), which is determined by Equation 2 below, is also an optimal design method for the cost-effectiveness of environmental load screening test:
[Formula 2]
In general formula (2), PE represents induction efficiency.
Vibration load application time (t vib ) is determined by Equation 3 below.
[Formula 3]
In general formula (3), F represents the weighting factor (series: 1, parallel: 1.18) according to the test type.
The induction efficiency (PE) is determined by the following general formula 4, environmental load screening test cost-effectiveness optimal design method:
[Formula 4]
In Equation 4, DE represents the detection efficiency, D Lat is latent defect, D Pat is obvious defect, and D Remain (Goal) represents the target residual defect density.
The total design time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test is determined by Equation 5 below.
[Formula 5]
In Equation 5, the temperature change rate (ΔR) and the vibration magnitude (ΔG) are determined by the maximum temperature change rate and the maximum vibration magnitude, respectively, and the cost-effectiveness of the environmental load screening test is also optimal design method.
Based on the maximum temperature change rate and the maximum vibration magnitude, the cycle-based minimum test time, which is the closest to the theoretical minimum value calculated by Equation 5, is selected as the total time (t Total ) of the environmental load screening test. The design method is also effective.
The detection efficiency (DE) is an optimal design method for the cost effectiveness of the environmental load screening test, which is determined by the product of the test type, the environmental conditions during the test, and the bond detection / removal capability.
Environmental load screening test further includes the step of generating a temperature change graph according to the total time required (t Total ), the temperature change graph to generate a temperature change graph between the temperature rising section and the temperature falling section, the environmental load, Optimal design method for cost effectiveness of screening test.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020180038532A KR102032646B1 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2018-04-03 | Cost-effectiveness and optimized test design method and apparatus of mass production weapon system Environmental stress screening |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020180038532A KR102032646B1 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2018-04-03 | Cost-effectiveness and optimized test design method and apparatus of mass production weapon system Environmental stress screening |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR20190115622A KR20190115622A (en) | 2019-10-14 |
| KR102032646B1 true KR102032646B1 (en) | 2019-10-15 |
Family
ID=68171602
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020180038532A KR102032646B1 (en) | 2018-04-03 | 2018-04-03 | Cost-effectiveness and optimized test design method and apparatus of mass production weapon system Environmental stress screening |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR102032646B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20220003428A (en) | 2020-07-01 | 2022-01-10 | 김민찬 | Method for evaluating the adequacy of design changes of developed military equipment |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111262203B (en) * | 2020-01-16 | 2021-05-18 | 国网山西省电力公司晋城供电公司 | Processing method and device for sag adjustment integrated adjusting plate |
-
2018
- 2018-04-03 KR KR1020180038532A patent/KR102032646B1/en active IP Right Grant
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 김장은, '양산 무기체계 환경 부하 선별 시험 효과도 분석 및 프로파일 설계 자동화 도구 구현'. 한국산학기술학회 논문지 17(8), 2016년8월, pp.379-388. 1부.* |
| 비특허문헌(품질경영학회지) |
| 비특허문헌(한국품질경영학회) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20220003428A (en) | 2020-07-01 | 2022-01-10 | 김민찬 | Method for evaluating the adequacy of design changes of developed military equipment |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR20190115622A (en) | 2019-10-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10430531B2 (en) | Model based system monitoring | |
| JP7102941B2 (en) | Information processing methods, information processing devices, and programs | |
| KR102032646B1 (en) | Cost-effectiveness and optimized test design method and apparatus of mass production weapon system Environmental stress screening | |
| CZ295659B6 (en) | System and method for monitoring operational condition of electric motor | |
| KR20140039380A (en) | Apparatus and method for quality control using datamining in manufacturing process | |
| KR20170039906A (en) | Methiod for counting fatigue damage in frequency domain applicable to multi-spectral loading pattern | |
| Rigon et al. | Analysis of dissipated energy and temperature fields at severe notches of AISI 304L stainless steel specimens | |
| US11275005B2 (en) | Fatigue limit stress specification system, fatigue limit stress specification device, and fatigue limit stress specification method | |
| Menon et al. | Defence standard 00-56 issue 4: Towards evidence-based safety standards | |
| JP6702297B2 (en) | Abnormal state diagnosis method and abnormal state diagnosis device | |
| CN105308523B (en) | Plant diagnostics system | |
| KR102277276B1 (en) | Measuring system and method of metal material property | |
| Li et al. | Critical review of US Military environmental stress screening (ESS) handbook | |
| CN117677831A (en) | Method and system for generating test specimen specifications for predicting component fatigue life | |
| Braden et al. | A prognostic and data fusion based approach to validating automotive electronics | |
| JP7469661B2 (en) | Method for estimating load value applied to spot welded joints | |
| KR101928806B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for designing profile for Environmental Stress Screening Test | |
| CN114624038A (en) | Method and device for processing vibration load of wire bracket and railway vehicle | |
| US11886831B2 (en) | Data sorting device and method, and monitoring and diagnosis device | |
| Nyssen et al. | Experimental modal identification of mistuning in an academic blisk and comparison with the blades geometry variations | |
| KR101865270B1 (en) | Methiod for counting fatigue damage in frequency domain applicable to multi-spectral loading pattern | |
| Komorska et al. | On-board diagnostics of mechanical defects of the vehicle drive system based on the vibration signal reference model | |
| Sipkás et al. | Testing accelerated life data of micro switches | |
| JP6965123B2 (en) | Data processing equipment, measurement system and data processing program | |
| CN112146890A (en) | Method and apparatus for evaluating and selecting signal comparison metrics |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| E701 | Decision to grant or registration of patent right | ||
| GRNT | Written decision to grant |