KR101935330B1 - Conflict factor evaluation system of construction project and method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project and a method thereof. The conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project selects a conflict factor of a construction project by characteristics of the construction project and the importance and determination of a decision maker among economic, institutional/procedural, technical/environmental factors. Furthermore, the conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project analyzes a gap in recognition on the conflict factors by evaluating the importance of the selected conflict factors from participants, thereby evaluating a gap in recognition on the construction project among the participants. According to the present invention, the conflict factor which can occur in the construction project can be quantitatively evaluated by deriving conflict factors having the greatest recognition gap among the participants of the construction project.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The present invention relates to a system and method for evaluating conflict factors in a construction project,

The present invention relates to a system for evaluating conflict factors in a construction project, and more specifically, to evaluate the level of construction conflict in the early stages of a construction project, information on the importance of the participants from an economic, institutional / procedural, technical / The purpose of this study is to analyze the conflict perception among construction project participants who analyze the gaps in conflict perception based on the concept of conflict.

In general, the construction industry has a characteristic in that various subjects operate in different places and at different times with different interests. Due to these characteristics, there is always the possibility of disputes among different construction industry participants, such as the owner, designer, supervisor, contractor, subcontractor, due to different interests. If the contracting parties involved in the construction industry fail to reach an agreement before a dispute, a dispute will arise.

Therefore, in the construction project, conflicts always arise around the project participants, and as the size of the construction project increases and the structure of the participants become more complicated, the level of conflict becomes more serious. These conflicts arise from the recognition gap of the participants in the construction project, especially those affected by the construction projects such as government, local residents and civic groups rather than conflicts among the internal participants who manage and manage direct construction projects such as clients, designers, Conflicts among external participants are serious and have a greater impact on society.

This causes not only the construction project but also economic problems such as economic loss and political confrontation. Since the national project is a large part of the large-scale construction project, the conflicts in the construction project have a great influence on the social policy as well as the future policy .

As a result, not only is government-led business progress more difficult in accordance with the changing trend of the times, but also a way to mitigate conflicts for sustainable development is needed. However, in spite of the increasing need for methods to resolve conflicts among external participants, most of the previous studies have focused on resolving conflicts among internal participants, suggesting alternatives for conflict resolution without considering the recognition gap, There is no analysis on the recognition gap of external participants.

Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2009-0019064 (published on February 25, 2009). Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 10-2015-0080110 (Publication date 2015.07.09.) Korean Registered Patent No. 10-0540159 (Published on Jan. 10, 2006) Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2010-0100197 (published September 15, 2010).

'Development of conflict index considering differences in perception among the stakeholders in the construction business', Min Janghee, Lee Chang - joon, Han Seung - heon (2016.10), Korean Society of Civil Engineers Conference, pp. 47-48. 'Trend Analysis of Public Construction Projects in the Perspective of Conflict', YC Chang, Woo Sik Won, Han Seung Heon (May 20, 2015), Korean Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 5-6. 'Analysis of Conflict Structure in Local Infrastructure Installation Projects - Focusing on the case of Sungmisan Reservoir Construction Project', Jeonju Sangsang (2015.10), Social Science Research, 26 (4), 121-142.

The system and method for evaluating conflict factors in a construction project according to the present invention have the following problems.

First, in order to analyze the gap of conflict recognition among the external participants of the construction project, the present invention analyzes the importance of the various conflict factors according to the construction project and evaluates the gap of the recognition of conflict among the external participants.

Secondly, the present invention aims to derive the conflict factors among the external participants in the construction project with respect to the economic, institutional / procedural, technical / environmental aspects among the conflict factors of the construction project.

Third, the present invention analyzes and evaluates the factors of conflict in construction projects and predicts future conflict levels in construction projects.

The solution of the present invention is not limited to those mentioned above, and other solutions not mentioned can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description.

To achieve the above objects, in order to mitigate the conflicts arising in the construction project, the system for evaluating the conflict factors of the construction project according to the present invention is constructed in such a manner that the conflict factors of the participants in terms of economic, institutional / procedural, technical / This paper analyzes the gaps in the recognition of conflict factors and evaluates the gaps in the recognition of conflicts among the participants. The conflict evaluation system of the construction project is able to quantitatively evaluate the conflict factors that can occur in the construction project by deriving the conflict factors with the greatest recognition gap among the participants of the construction project.

According to this aspect, the system for evaluating conflict factors of a construction project of the present invention includes: a characteristic of a construction project; a conflict factor selecting unit for selecting a plurality of conflict factors according to a decision maker; A data input unit for receiving recognition data including ranking information distributed according to the importance information and the importance information about the conflict factors from each of the participants with respect to the conflict factors selected by the conflict factor selecting unit; A data collecting unit collecting the recognition data inputted from the data input unit and classifying the collected recognition data according to a conflict factor and a participant group; A factor analysis unit that analyzes the recognition data classified by the conflict factors and the participant groups using the importance information and the ranking information and converts the analysis results into recognition scores to calculate the conflict recognition gap score; And a conflict factor evaluation unit for weighting the conflict recognition gap points by applying the weight to the conflict factors and analyzing and evaluating the conflict factors for the construction project through the summed scores of the conflict recognition gap.

In one embodiment of this aspect, the conflict factor selection unit comprises: Among the various conflict factors, at least one of economic conflict, institutional / procedural conflict, and technical / environmental conflict factors are selected.

In this embodiment, the conflict factor selecting unit selects at least the irrationality of the compensation level, the lack of provision of livelihood support measures, the local development inhibition item, the private property inclusion item, and the local image disillusionment item as the economic conflict factors; The institutional / procedural conflict factors include irrational reward system and procedure items, non-transparency items of project implementation, inadequate citizen participation procedure items, unilateral location and route selection procedure items, lack of conflict resolution effort, At least a choice of urgent items; In addition, there are disagreement items on the risk of ecological environment, damage to cultural properties and area symbol, possibility of safety accidents, feasibility of existing technology alternatives, risks and risks of facilities, cultural property and geographical symbol At least choose whether to disagree with the opinion.

In another embodiment, the factor-by-factor analysis unit may include an importance evaluation unit that evaluates recognition data classified by a conflict factor and a participant group according to importance of conflict factors to be prioritized when a construction project is performed; A ranking evaluator for calculating a ranking of conflict factors through relative comparison of conflict factors according to importance; After the importance and ranking are evaluated, the recognition data collected by each participant group is evaluated in terms of importance and ranking. The recognition score of each participant group is calculated according to the distribution of recognition per participant group, and the recognition score And a group-specific evaluation unit for calculating the gap.

In another embodiment, the conflict factor evaluation unit may include: a weighted summation unit for weighting the scores of the conflict recognition gap by the conflict factors by applying a weight to the conflict factors; And a project appraisal unit that evaluates the gaps in the perception of conflicts for construction projects through weighted cumulative conflict recognition gap scores.

In another embodiment, the conflict factor evaluator may include: The results of the evaluation showed that the decision makers were able to identify conflict factors with the greatest recognition gap among the participants in the construction project, And to determine the quantitative evaluation of the conflicts that may arise from.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for evaluating a conflict factor evaluation system in a construction project is provided.

According to this characteristic evaluation method of the conflict factor evaluation system of the construction project, the method of selecting the conflict factor of the construction project is characterized by the characteristics of the construction project and the plurality of conflict factors of the construction project by the decision maker; The data collection unit collects the recognition data of each participant on the selected conflict factors and analyzes the conflict recognition gap according to the importance and ranking of the collected recognition data in the analysis unit according to the factor of conflict, A step of calculating the gaps in perception of conflict factors; And evaluating the conflict recognition gap in the construction project based on the calculated gaps in the perception of the conflict factors in the evaluation unit of the conflict factor.

In one embodiment of this aspect, the step of selecting conflict factors comprises: Among the various conflict factors, at least one of economic conflict, institutional / procedural conflict, and technical / environmental conflict factors are selected.

In this embodiment, the step of selecting conflict factors may include at least one of irrationality of compensation level, lack of provision of livelihood support measures, inhibition of local development, infringement of private property, Select; The institutional / procedural conflict factors include irrational reward system and procedure items, non-transparency items of project implementation, inadequate citizen participation procedure items, unilateral location and route selection procedure items, lack of conflict resolution effort, At least a choice of urgent items; In addition, there are disagreement items on the risk of ecological environment, damage to cultural properties and area symbol, possibility of safety accidents, feasibility of existing technology alternatives, risks and risks of facilities, cultural property and geographical symbol At least choose whether to disagree with the opinion.

In another embodiment, the step of computing the conflict factor recognition gap comprises: The ranking is evaluated according to the importance of conflict factors, and the recognition gap is calculated by converting rankings into recognition scores.

In yet another embodiment, the step of computing the conflict factor recognition gap comprises: Each of the conflict factors is converted into the importance score according to the 7 point scale, and the ranking according to the importance score is evaluated.

In yet another embodiment, the step of computing the conflict factor recognition gap comprises: After the importance and ranking are evaluated, the importance and ranking of each participant group are evaluated. The recognition score of each participant group is calculated according to the recognition distribution per participant group, and the recognition gap is calculated by the recognition score of each participant group.

In another embodiment, evaluating the conflict awareness gap comprises: The results of the evaluation showed that the decision makers were able to identify conflict factors with the greatest recognition gap among the participants in the construction project, And to determine the quantitative evaluation of the conflicts that may arise from.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer program stored in a computer-readable recording medium for executing a method of evaluating a conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project, in combination with hardware.

The system and method for evaluating conflict factors in a construction project according to the present invention have the following effects.

First, the present invention can judge the importance of the conflict factors of the participants of the construction project, especially the external participants, in terms of economic, institutional / procedural, technical / environmental.

Second, the present invention provides a quantitative evaluation of conflict factors that can occur in construction projects by deriving the conflict factors with the greatest recognition gap among the external participants of the construction project from three viewpoints of economic, institutional / procedural, technical / environmental It is possible.

Third, the present invention provides a support for establishing a strategy for mitigating conflict from the early stage of a construction project by predicting future conflict level in a construction project.

The effects of the present invention are not limited to those mentioned above, and other effects not mentioned can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art from the following description.

1 is a block diagram showing the construction of a construction project conflict factor evaluation system according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a conflict factor selecting unit shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the structure of the analysis unit for each factor shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a distribution of difference of recognition scores converted by the ranking evaluation unit shown in FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a conflict recognition gap analysis derived by the group-by-group evaluation unit shown in FIG. 3;
6 is a block diagram showing a configuration of the conflict factor evaluation unit shown in FIG. 1, and FIG.
7 is a flowchart showing an evaluation procedure of a construction project conflict factor evaluation system according to the present invention.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art can easily carry out the present invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Wherever possible, the same or similar parts are denoted using the same reference numerals in the drawings.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. The singular forms as used herein include plural forms as long as the phrases do not expressly express the opposite meaning thereto.

Means that a particular feature, region, integer, step, operation, element and / or component is specified and that other specific features, regions, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and / It does not exclude the existence or addition of a group.

All terms including technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Predefined terms are further interpreted as having a meaning consistent with the relevant technical literature and the present disclosure, and are not to be construed as ideal or very formal meanings unless defined otherwise.

The construction project conflict factor evaluation system according to the present invention collects and evaluates the importance of the conflict factors of the participants in terms of economic, institutional / procedural, and technical / environmental aspects to mitigate conflicts in construction projects, We analyze the recognition gap of factors and evaluate the conflict recognition gap of participants' construction projects.

According to the present invention, it is possible to quantitatively evaluate factors of conflict that may arise in a construction project. Based on this, it is possible to estimate the factors of the largest recognition gap and the level of future conflict factors by the participants, We can support the establishment of strategies to mitigate conflicts.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project according to the present invention, FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a conflict factor selection unit shown in FIG. 1, FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a distribution of difference of recognition scores converted by the ranking evaluation unit shown in FIG. 3, and FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the distribution of the recognition scores calculated by the evaluation unit for each group FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a conflict factor evaluation unit shown in FIG. 1. FIG.

Referring to FIGS. 1 to 6, a system for evaluating a construction project conflict factor 100 according to the present invention is capable of quantitatively evaluating conflict factors that may occur in a construction project, and based on this, In order to support the establishment of strategies to mitigate conflicts in the early stages of the construction project by predicting the factors and the level of future conflict factors, various conflict factors are selected according to the characteristics of the construction project and the selected conflict factors , The evaluation of the ranking is performed according to the degree of importance of the participants, and the recognition gap is calculated to evaluate the gaps in the recognition of the conflict factors in the construction project.

Such a construction project conflict factor evaluation system 100 is provided as a computer network system including, for example, a personal computer, a portable computer, and the like, a client and a server, We collect the recognition data of the participants and process them to analyze and evaluate the conflict factors of the construction project.

The construction project conflict factor evaluation system 100 includes a conflict factor selection unit 110, a data input unit 120, a data collection unit 130, a factor analysis unit 140, and a conflict factor evaluation unit 150 ).

Specifically, the conflict factor selector 110 determines whether the characteristics of the construction project (for example, the construction target, the scope and the design direction) and the decision maker, for example, the construction project owner or the contractor, We select multiple conflict factors with importance and necessity.

The conflict factor selection unit 110 of this embodiment includes an economic factor selection unit 112, a system / procedure factor selection unit 114 and a technology / environment factor selection unit 116, as shown in FIG. In this paper, we propose a model of conflict between two or more economic conflicts.

Selected economic conflict factors, institutional / procedural conflict factors, and technical / environmental conflict factors are shown in Table 1 below. There are at least five economic conflicts, at least seven institutional / procedural conflicts, and at least six technical / environmental conflicts.

That is, the economic factor selection unit 112 selects one of the various conflict factors based on economic factors such as irrationality of compensation level, lack of provision of livelihood support measures, inhibition of regional development, Select the highlighted item.

The institutional / procedural factor selection unit 114 selects, among the various conflict factors, conflict factors based on the institutional and procedural viewpoints, such as unreasonable compensation plan and procedure items, opaque items of business promotion, inadequate citizen participation procedure items, And the route selection procedure item, conflict resolution effort effort item, absence of business necessity item, and urgency item of business are selected.

In addition, the technical / environmental factor selection unit 116 may determine conflict factors based on technological and environmental viewpoints among various conflict factors such as ecological environment damage items, cultural property and local symbol damage items, safety accident occurrence items, The disagreement item of the validity item, the risk and the risk range of the facility, the existence of the cultural property and the landmark symbol, or the disagreement item of the disagreement item.

In order to evaluate the perception of conflicts, the conflict factor manager 110 selects 18 classification conflicts among the three classification systems: economic, institutional / procedural, and technical / environmental conflict factors. The choice of such conflict factors can be determined by the nature of the construction project, the subjective significance of the decision maker, and the judgment.

The data input unit 120 receives data on the conflict factors selected by the conflict factor selecting unit 110 from the participant (s), for example, the internal partner participating in the construction project, . In this embodiment, the data input unit 120 receives the recognition data by focusing on the external participants, in particular, among the participants. Here, the recognition data includes importance information that each participant recognizes for economic conflict, institutional / procedural conflict, and technical / environmental conflict factors, and ranking information distributed according to the importance.

The data input unit 120 receives input of recognition data on the selected construction project conflict factors through the questionnaires from the participants, or receives data on the electronic terminals (for example, a personal computer, a portable terminal, and the like) of each participant connected to the wired / Smart phone, etc.).

The data collecting unit 130 collects the recognition data input from the data input unit 120 and classifies the collected recognition data according to a conflict factor, a participant group, and the like. For example, participant groups are classified as governments, local residents, civic groups, and so on.

The factor analysis unit 140 analyzes the recognition data classified by each conflict factor and the participant group using the importance information and the ranking information, and converts the analysis result into the recognition score. The factor-by-factor analysis unit 140 calculates the recognition gap using the converted recognition score.

As shown in FIG. 3, the factor-by-factor analysis unit 140 of this embodiment includes a priority evaluation unit 142, a ranking evaluation unit 144, and an evaluation unit 146 for each group.

The importance evaluation unit 142 evaluates the recognition data classified by each conflict factor and the participant group according to the importance of the conflict factors to be prioritized when the construction project is carried out.

The rank evaluator 144 calculates the rank of each conflict factor through a relative comparison of the conflict factors according to the importance. Here, the conflict factors evaluated in rank are converted into importance scores by the ranking evaluation unit 144 and distributed in a bell-shaped form as shown in FIG. For example, in the case of using the 7 point scale, the conflict factors evaluated as the most important, that is, the conflict factors in the first place are converted into 7 points, and the conflict factors evaluated as the least important, It is converted into 1 point. Therefore, by utilizing the method of converting the rank to score, there is an advantage that the participants' perception of the conflict factors can be analyzed more finely, and the distribution of the recognition difference can be variously changed according to the decision maker and the importance.

After the importance and ranking are evaluated, the evaluation unit 146 evaluates the recognition data collected by the participant groups in terms of importance and ranking, and calculates the recognition score for each participant group according to the recognition distribution per participant group. The group-specific evaluation unit 146 calculates the recognition gap based on the perceived score of each participant group. Here, the perceptual distribution of the participant groups is generated according to each participant group after the evaluation, as shown in FIG. In this embodiment, the evaluation of one conflict factor is divided into a participant group A and a participant group B, and the participant group A has a bell-shaped recognition distribution form spreading relatively wide from 2 to 7 , And participant group B has a bell-shaped recognition distribution shape with a relatively narrow width of importance score of 6 to 7.

In order to analyze the gaps in recognition of conflicts in the construction project, the conflict factor evaluation unit 150 calculates the conflict recognition gap score of the construction project by weighting the conflict recognition gap points for each conflict factor. In this case, the weight of conflict factors is used to calculate the conflict recognition gap score.

As shown in FIG. 6, the conflict factor evaluating unit 150 of the present embodiment includes a weighted summation unit 152 for weighting the scores of the conflict recognition gap by each weight of the conflict factors, And a project evaluation unit 154 for evaluating the recognition gap of the conflict factors on the construction project through the conflict recognition gap score.

Accordingly, the conflict factor evaluation unit 150 evaluates the gap in recognition of conflicts among the participants on the corresponding construction project through the calculated scores of the conflict recognition gaps, and thereby, the decision maker determines the most recognizable gap among the participants Determine the factors of conflict that may arise in the construction project and determine the quantitative evaluation of the conflict factors.

And FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation procedure of a conflict factor evaluation system for a construction project according to the present invention. This procedure is carried out by a computer program which is processed by a conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project, and the computer program is stored in a computer-readable recording medium.

Referring to FIG. 7, the conflict factor evaluation system 100 of the construction project of the present invention selects a conflict factor of a construction project in step S200. Specifically, the factors of conflict in the construction project are selected as 18 conflict factors among the three classification systems shown in Table 1, namely, economic, institutional / procedural, and technical / environmental conflict factors in order to evaluate conflict perception. The choice of such conflict factors can be determined by the nature of the construction project, the subjective significance of the decision maker, and the judgment.

The recognition data of each participant on the selected conflict factors are collected in step S210, and the conflict recognition gap is analyzed for each conflict factor through the importance and ranking of the collected recognition data. Specifically, it analyzes the conflict factors whose importance and ranking are evaluated by the participants of the construction project, and calculates it as the recognition gap according to the participant group. In other words, the ranking is evaluated according to the importance of each conflict factor, and the recognition gap is calculated by converting ranking into recognition score.

In this embodiment, the step of analyzing the conflict recognition gap by each conflict factor (S220) is that the conflict factors selected by the decision maker are evaluated by the participants of the construction project (for example, government, local residents, etc.) . This evaluation is evaluated according to the importance of the conflict factors that should be prioritized when the construction project is carried out and it is evaluated as rank by the relative comparison of conflict factors. The conflict factors evaluated as ranking are converted into importance scores having 1 to 7 points according to the 7-point scale as shown in FIG. After the importance and ranking are evaluated, the importance and ranking of the recognition data collected by the participant group are evaluated, and the recognition score of each participant group is calculated according to the recognition distribution per participant group. The recognition gap is calculated by the perceived score of each participant group. As shown in FIG. 5, perceptual distribution for each participant group is generated according to each participant group after the evaluation is proceeded.

In this embodiment, the recognition score of each participant group is calculated according to the following Equation 1 according to each recognition distribution.

는 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 '참여자 그룹 j'의 인식 점수를 나타내고,

는 '참여자 그룹 j' 내에서 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 X점 척도에 따른 중요도 점수를 나타내고,

는 '참여자 그룹 j' 내에서 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 중요도 점수가

인 평가자 수를 나타내며, 그리고

는 '참여자 그룹 j'의 총 평가자 수를 나타낸다.here,

Represents the recognition score of 'participant group j' for 'conflict factor i'

Indicates the importance score according to the X point scale for the 'conflict factor i' in the 'participant group j'

, The importance score for 'conflict factor i' in 'participant group j'

Indicates the number of evaluators, and

Represents the total number of evaluators of 'participant group j'.

When the recognition score is calculated for each participant group according to Equation (1), the recognition gap score is calculated by Equation (2) below.

는 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 '참여자 그룹 j₁과 j₂'의 인식 격차 점수를 나타내고,

는 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 '참여자 그룹 j'의 인식 점수를 나타내며, 그리고

는 '갈등 요인 i'에 대해 비교 참여자 그룹들의 인식 점수

과

의 평균을 나타내고, X는 X점 척도의 숫자 X를 나타낸다.here,

Is the recognition gap score of 'participant group j ₁ and j ₂ ' for 'conflict factor i'

Represents the recognition score of 'participant group j' for 'conflict factor i', and

, 'Conflicting Factor i'

and

And X represents the number X of the X point scale.

The recognition gap score calculated in Equation (2) is the difference between recognition scores of the two participant groups A and B, and can have a positive (+) value and a negative (-) value. As shown in FIG. 5, at the point of participant group A, the recognition gap score having a positive value is an overestimated conflict factor, and the recognition gap score having a negative (negative) And it is possible to derive the factor with the greatest recognition gap by comparing the magnitude (absolute value) of the recognition gap score.

And then evaluating the conflict recognition gap of the construction project based on the recognition gap by the conflict factors calculated in step S220.

In the step S220 of evaluating the conflict recognition gap in this embodiment, the score of the conflict recognition gap in the construction project is calculated by weighted addition of the recognition gap score for each individual conflict factor calculated in the step S210. Here, the weight is determined according to the subject of the final evaluator (or the decision maker), and the gaps in recognition recognition of the construction project conflict are calculated as shown in Equation 3 below.

는 특정 건설 프로젝트의 갈등 인식 격차 점수를 나타내고,

은 단계 S200에서 선택한 갈등 요인의 전체 개수를 나타내고,

는 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 가중치를 나타내며, 그리고

는 '갈등 요인 i'에 대한 '참여자 그룹 j₁과 j₂'의 인식 격차 점수를 나타낸다.here,

, Which shows the conflict recognition gap score of a specific construction project,

Represents the total number of conflict factors selected in step S200,

Represents the weight for the 'conflict factor i', and

Is the recognition gap score of 'participant group j ₁ and j ₂ ' for 'conflict factor i'.

The difference in recognition recognition of the construction project conflict in this embodiment has a value between 0 and 100. The larger the value, the greater the recognition gap between the comparative participants in the corresponding construction project. This means that the conflict level of the construction project is high .

The evaluation method of the construction project conflict factor evaluation system according to the present invention shown in Fig. 7 can be provided in a computer program stored in a computer-readable recording medium in combination with hardware.

That is, the evaluation method of the construction project conflict factor evaluation system according to the present invention can be implemented as a computer-readable code stored in a computer-readable recording medium. The computer readable recording medium includes various types of storage devices in which data that can be read by a computer system is stored. For example, the recording medium includes ROM, RAM, optical disk, magnetic tape, floppy disk, hard disk, nonvolatile memory, and the like. The computer-readable recording medium may also be distributed and distributed in a networked computer system so that computer readable codes may be stored and executed in a distributed manner.

The embodiments and the accompanying drawings described in the present specification are merely illustrative of some of the technical ideas included in the present invention. Accordingly, the embodiments disclosed herein are for the purpose of describing rather than limiting the technical spirit of the present invention, and it is apparent that the scope of the technical idea of the present invention is not limited by these embodiments. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

100: Construction project conflict factor evaluation system
110: Conflict factor selection
120: Data input unit
130: Data collection unit
140: Factor analysis section
150: Conflict Factor Evaluation Unit

Claims (14)

In the conflict evaluation system of construction projects:
Characteristics of Construction Projects and Conflict Factors for Selecting Multiple Conflict Factors According to Decision Makers;
A data input unit for receiving recognition data including ranking information distributed according to the importance information and the importance information about the conflict factors from each of the participants with respect to the conflict factors selected by the conflict factor selecting unit;
A data collecting unit collecting the recognition data inputted from the data input unit and classifying the collected recognition data according to a conflict factor and a participant group;
A factor analysis unit that analyzes the recognition data classified by the conflict factors and the participant groups using the importance information and the ranking information and converts the analysis results into recognition scores to calculate the conflict recognition gap score; And
And a conflict factor evaluator that analyzes the conflict factors of the construction project through the weighted sum of the conflict awareness gap scores by applying the weight to the conflict factors,
In the factor-by-factor analysis unit, the recognition score of each participant group is calculated according to the following equation (1)
[Equation 1]

(here,

Represents the recognition score of 'participant group j' for 'conflict factor i'

Indicates the importance score according to the X point scale for the 'conflict factor i' in the 'participant group j'

, The importance score for 'conflict factor i' in 'participant group j'

Indicates the number of evaluators, and

Represents the total number of evaluators of 'participant group j'.)
The conflict factor evaluation unit calculates a recognition gap score using Equation (2) if the recognition score is calculated for each participant group according to Equation (1).
&Quot; (2) "

(here,

Is the recognition gap score of 'participant group j ₁ and j ₂ ' for 'conflict factor i'

Represents the recognition score of 'participant group j' for 'conflict factor i', and

, 'Conflicting Factor i'

and

, And X represents the number X of the X point scale) The method according to claim 1,
Wherein the conflict factor selection unit comprises:
A system for evaluating conflict factors in construction projects, characterized in that at least one of economic conflict factors, institutional / procedural conflict factors, and technical / environmental conflict factors are selected from among various conflict factors. The method of claim 2,
The conflict factor selection unit,
At least the irrationality of the compensation level, the lack of provision of livelihood support measures, the inhibition of local development, the invasion of private property, and the image of the local image are selected at least as the economic conflict factors;
The institutional / procedural conflict factors include irrational reward system and procedure items, non-transparency items of project implementation, inadequate citizen participation procedure items, unilateral location and route selection procedure items, lack of conflict resolution effort, At least a choice of urgent items;
In addition, there are disagreement items on the risk of ecological environment, damage to cultural properties and local symbol, risk of accident occurrence, feasibility of current technology alternative, risk of facility and risk range, cultural property and geographical symbol Whether to disagree with the opinion, at least to select the item; A system for evaluating conflict factors in construction projects. The method according to claim 1,
The factor-
The importance evaluation unit evaluates the recognition data classified by the conflict factors and the participant groups according to the importance of the conflict factors to be prioritized when the construction project is carried out.
A ranking evaluator for calculating a ranking of conflict factors through relative comparison of conflict factors according to importance; And
After the evaluation of importance and ranking, recognition data collected for each participant group is evaluated in terms of importance and ranking, and recognition score for each participant group is calculated according to recognition distribution per participant group. And a group evaluating unit for evaluating a conflict factor of the construction project. The method according to claim 1,
The conflict factor evaluation unit
A weighted summation unit for weighting the scores of conflict recognition perception by applying weighting to conflict factors; And
And a project evaluation unit for evaluating the gaps in the recognition of conflict factors for the construction project through the weighted sum of the conflict recognition gap points. The method according to claim 1 or 5,
The conflict factor evaluation unit may include:
The results of the evaluation showed that the decision makers were able to identify conflict factors with the greatest recognition gap among the participants in the construction project, And to evaluate the quantitative evaluation of the conflict factors that may occur in the construction project. In the evaluation method of the conflict factor evaluation system of the construction project:
Determining Conflict Factors In the government, selecting the characteristics of the construction project and the plurality of conflict factors of the construction project by the decision maker;
The data collection unit collects the recognition data of each participant on the selected conflict factors and analyzes the difference of the conflict recognition according to the importance and rank of the collected recognition data in the analysis unit according to the factor of conflict, Calculating a recognition gap of the conflict factors for each participant group; And
And evaluating the conflict recognition gap in the construction project based on the recognized gaps in the conflict factors calculated by the conflict factor evaluation unit,
The recognition score for each participant group is calculated according to Equation (1) below,
[Equation 1]

(here,

Represents the recognition score of 'participant group j' for 'conflict factor i'

Indicates the importance score according to the X point scale for the 'conflict factor i' in the 'participant group j'

, The importance score for 'conflict factor i' in 'participant group j'

Indicates the number of evaluators, and

Represents the total number of evaluators of the participant group j)
Wherein the recognition gap score is calculated through Equation (2) if the recognition score is calculated for each participant group according to Equation (1).
&Quot; (2) "

(here,

Is the recognition gap score of 'participant group j ₁ and j ₂ ' for 'conflict factor i'

Represents the recognition score of 'participant group j' for 'conflict factor i', and

, 'Conflicting Factor i'

and

And X represents the number X of the X point scale.) The method of claim 7,
The step of selecting the conflict factor comprises:
A method for evaluating a conflict factor evaluation system for a construction project, characterized in that at least one of economic conflict factors, institutional / procedural conflict factors, and technical / environmental conflict factors are selected from among various conflict factors. The method of claim 8,
The step of selecting the conflict factor comprises:
At least the irrationality of the compensation level, the lack of provision of livelihood support measures, the inhibition of local development, the invasion of private property, and the image of the local image are selected at least as the economic conflict factors;
The institutional / procedural conflict factors include irrational reward system and procedure items, non-transparency items of project implementation, inadequate citizen participation procedure items, unilateral location and route selection procedure items, lack of conflict resolution effort, At least a choice of urgent items;
In addition, there are disagreement items on the risk of ecological environment, damage to cultural properties and area symbol, possibility of safety accidents, feasibility of existing technology alternatives, risks and risks of facilities, cultural property and geographical symbol Whether to disagree with the opinion, at least to select the item; A method for evaluating a conflict factor evaluation system in a construction project. The method of claim 7,
Wherein the step of calculating the conflict factor recognition gap comprises:
Wherein the ranking is evaluated according to the importance of the conflict factors, and the recognition gap is calculated by converting the ranking into the recognition score, thereby evaluating the conflict factor evaluation system of the construction project. The method of claim 7,
Wherein the step of calculating the conflict factor recognition gap comprises:
And each of the conflict factors is converted to a priority score according to the 7-point scale, and the ranking according to the priority score is evaluated. The method of claim 11,
Wherein the step of calculating the conflict factor recognition gap comprises:
After the importance and ranking are evaluated, the importance and ranking of each participant group are evaluated. The recognition score is calculated for each participant group according to the perception distribution of each participant group, and the recognition gap is calculated by the perceived score of each participant group The evaluation method of the conflict factor evaluation system in the construction project. The method of claim 7,
Evaluating the conflict awareness gap comprises:
The results of the evaluation showed that the decision makers were able to identify conflict factors with the greatest recognition gap among the participants in the construction project, The evaluation of the conflict factor evaluation system of the construction project. A computer program stored in a computer-readable recording medium for executing a method for evaluating a conflict factor evaluation system of a construction project according to any one of claims 7 to 13, in combination with hardware.

Images