KR101326177B1 - A short-term solvency evaluation system - Google Patents

A short-term solvency evaluation system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR101326177B1
KR101326177B1 KR1020120146008A KR20120146008A KR101326177B1 KR 101326177 B1 KR101326177 B1 KR 101326177B1 KR 1020120146008 A KR1020120146008 A KR 1020120146008A KR 20120146008 A KR20120146008 A KR 20120146008A KR 101326177 B1 KR101326177 B1 KR 101326177B1
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
evaluation
rating
unit
cash
module
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020120146008A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
권병태
한옥만
Original Assignee
전문건설공제조합
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 전문건설공제조합 filed Critical 전문건설공제조합
Priority to KR1020120146008A priority Critical patent/KR101326177B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR101326177B1 publication Critical patent/KR101326177B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/03Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/06Asset management; Financial planning or analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/12Accounting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/08Construction
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/80Management or planning
    • Y02P90/82Energy audits or management systems therefor

Abstract

The present invention relates to a short-term solvency evaluation system, more specifically it applies the evaluation rating information provided from the cash payment capability module, the key man evaluation module, and updated rating information from the examination check-list module to evaluate the short-term solvency of the estimation scale which can constantly improve the portfolio of the solid-liquid assurance, maximize the assurance of the good customers based on the future cash flow, provides a flexible assurance evaluation system, supplements a disadvantage of credit ratings in short-term solvency by improving international credit standing and upgrading assurance competitiveness, can receive evaluation ratings and scores of ability to pay back in exact and credible cash by the cash payment capability module which the evaluation results can define the cash flow, the construction site, the borrowed money and valid security reserve power and later combines the index, can modify the final ratings by the examination check-list module since the evaluation results come both from the metric and non-metric evaluations according to the examination check and examination filtering of the the examination check-list module, and finally, it can adjust and finalize the final ratings by the key man evaluation module by calculating the rating results based on the key man yaw rate of the key man evaluation module. [Reference numerals] (100) Cash payment capability module;(110) Cash flow evaluation unit;(120) Construction site evaluation unit;(130) Loan evaluation unit;(140) Valid security reserve power evaluation unit;(150) Cash payment capability evaluation rating unit;(200) Key Man evaluation module;(250) Key Man rating control unit;(300) Examination check list module;(310) Examination check unit;(320) Examination filtering unit;(350,360) Examination check and examination filtering rating control unit;(400) Final rating control unit;(500) Short period payment capability evaluation rating unit

Description

단기지급능력 평가시스템{A short-term solvency evaluation system}A short-term solvency evaluation system

본 발명은 현금지급능력모듈에서 평가한 평가등급정보와, key man 평가모듈과 심사체크리스트모듈에서 조정한 등급조정정보를 모두 적용하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부에서 평가함으로써, 고액보증의 포트폴리오를 지속적으로 개선하고 미래현금 흐름에 기반해서 우량고객의 보증을 확대하며, 탄력적인 보증심사 체계를 구성하고 대외신인도 제고 및 보증 경쟁력의 증대를 통해 신용평가의 단점을 단기지급능력을 통해 상호 보완할 수 있고, 현금지급능력모듈에서의 평가가 현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보여력을 구분하고 index를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, 정확하고 신뢰성 있는 현금지급능력의 평가 결과를 점수와 등급으로 얻을 수 있으며, 심사체크리스트모듈에서의 등급 조정이 심사체크와 심사필터링으로 구분하여 계량평가와 비계량평가를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, 심사체크리스트모듈에서 최종등급을 조정할 수 있고, key man 평가모듈에서의 등급 조정에 Key Man 이탈율을 토대로 산출된 등급조정과 부가세정보를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, key man 평가모듈에서 최종등급을 조정할 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템에 관한 기술이다.The present invention applies the evaluation grade information evaluated in the cash disability capability module and the rating adjustment information adjusted in the key man evaluation module and the audit checklist module to evaluate the portfolio in the short-term payment ability evaluation rating, thereby continuing the portfolio of large guarantees. The shortcomings of credit ratings can be compensated for through short-term payment ability by improving the quality of the customer, expanding the guarantees of excellent customers based on future cash flows, constructing a flexible guarantee screening system, enhancing external creditworthiness and increasing the competitiveness of guarantees. In addition, the evaluation in the cash payables module is performed by separating cash flows, construction sites, borrowings and effective collateral, and combining indexes to obtain accurate and reliable evaluation results of cash payables in terms of scores and grades. Grading adjustments in the checklist module are divided into audit check and audit filtering to weigh and evaluate The final rating can be adjusted in the audit checklist module, and the rating is calculated by combining the tax adjustment calculated on the basis of the key man departure rate and the VAT information. This is a description of the short-term payment capacity evaluation system that can adjust the final grade.

2010년 말을 기준으로 전문건설공제조합의 전 조합원인 건설업체의 상위 1,000개 조합의 보증잔액 비율은 51.07%로 매우 높은 수준임이 알려져 있고, 보증잔액 상위 100억 이상의 조합원도 24.55%의 비율로 알려져 있으므로, 보증상위 업체에 대한 신용위험이 항상 내재되어 있는 실정이다.As of the end of 2010, the guarantee balance of the top 1,000 unions of construction companies, which are all members of the specialized construction deduction associations, is known to be very high at 51.07%, and the members with more than 10 billion won of guarantee balances are also known as 24.55%. As a result, credit risks to the guarantee parent are always inherent.

또한 과거와 현재를 반영한 부도확률(PD)에 의한 손실위험의 측정을 통해 신용평가를 하므로 신용평가에 대한 한계점이 드러나고 있는 실정이다.In addition, the credit rating is measured by measuring the loss risk by the default probability (PD), which reflects the past and present.

그러므로 미래의 성장성을 반영할 수 있는 미래의 현금창출능력 측정을 통해 단기지급능력을 평가할 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 개발이 절실히 요구되고 있는 실정이다.Therefore, it is urgently needed to develop a short-term payment capability evaluation system that can evaluate short-term payment ability by measuring future cash-generating capacity that can reflect future growth.

KR 10-2006-0099873(2006. 10. 13)KR 10-2006-0099873 (October 13, 2006)

따라서 본 발명은 상기와 같은 문제점을 해결하기 위하여 착상된 것으로서, 현금지급능력모듈에서 평가한 평가등급정보와, key man 평가모듈과 심사체크리스트모듈에서 조정한 등급조정정보를 모두 적용하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부에서 평가함으로써, 고액보증의 포트폴리오를 지속적으로 개선하고 미래현금 흐름에 기반해서 우량고객의 보증을 확대하며, 탄력적인 보증심사 체계를 구성하고 대외신인도 제고 및 보증 경쟁력의 증대를 통해 신용평가의 단점을 단기지급능력을 통해 상호 보완할 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. Therefore, the present invention has been conceived to solve the above problems, the short-term payment ability by applying both the rating information evaluated in the cash payment capacity module, and the rating adjustment information adjusted in the key man evaluation module and the check check list module. By evaluating by the valuation department, we continuously improve our portfolio of high-guarantee guarantees, expand the guarantees of high-quality customers based on future cash flows, form a flexible guarantee audit system, and improve credit credit by enhancing external credit and guarantee competitiveness. The purpose is to provide a short-term payment capacity evaluation system that can complement each other's shortcomings through short-term payment capacity.

본 발명의 다른 목적은 현금지급능력모듈에서의 평가가 현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보여력을 구분하고 index를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, 정확하고 신뢰성 있는 현금지급능력의 평가 결과를 점수와 등급으로 얻을 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 제공하는데 있다. Another object of the present invention is to evaluate the cash flow capacity module by separating the cash flow and construction sites, borrowings and effective collateral capacity, combined index, so that the results of accurate and reliable evaluation of cash pay ability to score and grade It is to provide a short-term payment ability evaluation system that can be obtained.

본 발명의 다른 목적은 심사체크리스트모듈에서의 등급 조정이 심사체크와 심사필터링으로 구분하여 계량평가와 비계량평가를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, 심사체크리스트모듈에서 최종등급을 조정할 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 제공하는데 있다. Another object of the present invention is to adjust the final grade in the audit checklist module, by adjusting the rating in the audit checklist module is divided into the audit check and audit filtering, combined with the quantitative evaluation and non-quantitative evaluation. To provide.

본 발명의 다른 목적은 key man 평가모듈에서의 등급 조정에 Key Man 이탈율을 토대로 산출된 등급조정과 부가세정보를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, key man 평가모듈에서 최종등급을 조정할 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 제공하는데 있다. Another object of the present invention is achieved by combining the grading adjustment in the key man evaluation module and the VAT information calculated on the basis of the key man departure rate, and the VAT information, so that the final grading in the key man evaluation module can be adjusted. To provide.

상기 목적을 달성하기 위한 본 발명의 바람직한 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템은 현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보여력을 구분한 평가자료를 토대로 하여 평가한 결과에 각 개별 항목의 index를 결합하여 현금지급능력모듈에서 index가 결합된 평가결과를 현금지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 현금지급능력모듈과; 분기 내 퇴직 Key Man 수를 전 분기 Key Man 수로 나눈 값인 Key Man 이탈율을 적용하여 산출된 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 key man 평가모듈에서 Key Man 등급조정부로 전송하는 Key Man 평가 모듈과; 공사기간비율과 본사관리비비율과 공사현장비율과 직불비율과 여건보고 비율을 종합하여 평가하는 계량평가와, 유찰경력과 원도급 낙찰율과 공사지연 및 중단 사유를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사체크부와; 단기연체로 인한 부도소문과 출자증권의 가압류 사항과 단기연체 여부와 현장의 가압류 여부를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사필터링부를 포함하며, 계량평가와 비계량평가의 평가자료를 토대로 평가한 결과를 심사체크리스트모듈에서 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부로 전송하는 심사체크리스트모듈과; 상기 현금지급능력모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 현금지급능력 평가등급부와; 상기 key man 평가모듈로부터 전송받은 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 Key Man 등급조정부와; 상기 심사체크리스트모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부와; 상기 Key Man 등급조정부의 등급 조정을 위한 정보와, 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부의 평가결과를 전송받은 후 최종 등급을 조정하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 최종 등급조정부와; 상기 현금지급능력 평가등급부의 평가결과와, 최종 등급조정부의 조정된 최종 등급을 전송받고 단기지급능력 평가등급을 정하는 단기지급능력 평가등급부; 을 포함함을 특징으로 한다.In the short-term payment capacity evaluation system according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention for achieving the above object, the index of each individual item in the evaluation results based on the evaluation data that separates cash flow and construction sites, borrowings and effective collateral capacity. A cash payability module for transmitting the combined evaluation results of the indexes in the cash payability module to the cash payability evaluation grade unit; A key man evaluation module configured to transmit information for adjustment of a rating, which is calculated by applying a key man departure rate, which is a value obtained by dividing the number of retirement key men in a quarter by the number of key men in the previous quarter, from a key man evaluation module to a key man rating adjustment unit; An assessment check that consists of a valuation evaluation that evaluates the construction period ratio, the headquarters management ratio, the construction equipment ratio, the debit ratio, and the condition reporting ratio. Wealth; It includes a screening filtering unit that consists of non-quantitative assessments that comprehensively assess the default rumors due to short-term delinquency, investment securities, and whether or not short-term delinquency and on-site pressurization are included. An audit checklist module for transmitting the audit checklist module to the audit check and audit filtering grade adjusting unit; A cash payment capability evaluation unit for transmitting the evaluation result received from the cash payment capability module to the short-term payment ability evaluation unit; A key man rating controller for transmitting the rating information received from the key man evaluation module to a final rating controller; An audit check and an audit filtering grade adjuster which transmits the evaluation result received from the audit check list module to a final grade adjuster; A final grade adjusting unit for adjusting the final grade after receiving information for adjusting the grade of the key man grade adjusting unit and the evaluation result of the audit check and the filtering filtering grade adjusting unit, and transmitting the final grade to the short-term payment ability evaluation grade unit; A short-term payment ability evaluation rating unit for receiving the evaluation result of the cash payment ability evaluation rating unit and the adjusted final rating of the final rating adjustment unit and determining a short-term payment ability evaluation rating; .

상기 본 발명에 있어서, 상기 현금지급능력모듈은 3개월의 예금 평잔을 활용한 예금평잔 비율을 적용하여 현금의 흐름을 평가하는 현금흐름 평가부와; 현재의 기성청구액에서 미지급금을 차감한 공사수지 현황과, 매출채권의 회전기간과, 매입채무의 회전기간을 고려한 잠재적인 현금흐름과, 미래발생예정 공사수입에서 미래발생예정 공사비용을 차감한 공사수지 현황인 공사현황자료를 통한 현금흐름에 index 결합하여 공사현장을 평가하는 공사현장평가부와; 차입금의 상환능력과, 차입금의 변동성에 해당하는 신용공여정보를 index 결합하여 차입금을 평가하며, 부가세 정보의 매출과 매입, 차입금을 연계하여 영업으로 차입금을 상환할 수 있는 여력을 분석하는 차입금 평가부와; 유효담보와 관련한 신용공여정보에 유효담보 비율을 적용하여 유효담보여력을 평가하는 유효담보여력 평가부; 을 포함함을 특징으로 한다. In the present invention, the cash payability module comprises a cash flow evaluation unit for evaluating the flow of cash by applying the ratio of the deposit balance using the average balance of three months; Construction balances less current payables, current account recurring periods, potential cash flows taking into account retirement periods, and reversal periods of trade receivables, and future expenditures from future revenues A construction site evaluation unit for evaluating construction sites by indexing cash flows through construction status data; Borrowing evaluation unit that evaluates borrowings by indexing the ability to repay borrowings and credit information corresponding to the volatility of borrowings, and analyzes the ability to repay borrowings by operating sales, purchases and borrowings of VAT information. Wow; Effective collateral capacity evaluation unit for evaluating effective collateral capacity by applying the ratio of effective collateral to credit information related to the effective collateral; .

삭제delete

상기 본 발명에 있어서, 상기 Key Man 등급조정부의 Key Man 이탈율을 토대로 산출된 등급조정 결과를 심사자 단말기를 통해 등급조정 적용여부가 결정된 후 최종 등급조정부로 전송되는 것을 특징으로 한다. In the present invention, it is characterized in that the rating adjustment applied based on the key man departure rate of the key man rating adjustment unit through the examiner terminal is determined whether the rating adjustment is transmitted to the final rating adjustment unit.

삭제delete

상기 본 발명에 있어서, 상기 최종 등급조정부에서는 최종심사 등급조정부의 최종심사 등급조정과, Key Man 등급조정부의 Key Man 등급조정 중에서 현금지급능력 평가등급부에서 산출된 현금지급능력 평가등급을 보다 하향할 수 있는 방안을 적용하고, 상기 최종심사 등급조정부에서는 심사체크 등급조정부의 심사체크 등급조정과, 심사필터링 등급조정부의 심사필터링 등급조정 중에서 현금지급능력 평가등급부에서 산출된 현금지급능력 평가등급을 보다 하향할 수 있는 보수적인 방안을 적용하는 것을 특징으로 한다.In the present invention, the final rating adjuster in the final screening grade adjustment of the final screening grade adjustment, and the Key Man rating adjustment of the key man rating adjustment of the Key Man rating adjustment portion of the key pay ability evaluation grade lower than the lower The final evaluation grade adjustment section looks at the cash payment ability evaluation grade calculated by the cash payment ability evaluation grade of the audit check grade adjustment of the audit check grade adjustment and the audit filtering grade adjustment of the audit filtering grade adjustment. It is characterized by applying a conservative approach to downward.

상술한 바와 같이, 본 발명인 단기지급능력 평가시스템은 다음과 같은 효과를 가진다. As described above, the present inventors have a short-term payment capability evaluation system as follows.

첫째, 본 발명은 현금지급능력모듈에서 평가한 평가등급정보와, key man 평가모듈과 심사체크리스트모듈에서 조정한 등급조정정보를 모두 적용하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부에서 평가함으로써, 고액보증의 포트폴리오를 지속적으로 개선하고 미래현금흐름에 기반해서 우량고객의 보증을 확대하며, 탄력적인 보증심사 체계를 구성하고 대외신인도 제고 및 보증 경쟁력의 증대를 통해 신용평가와 단기지급능력을 상호 보완할 수 있다. First, the present invention applies the evaluation grade information evaluated in the cash disability capability module, and the rating adjustment information adjusted in the key man evaluation module and the check checklist module, and then evaluates in the short-term payment ability evaluation grade part, thereby making a large portfolio of guarantees. Can continuously complement credit ratings and short-term payment capabilities by continuously improving the quality of service, expanding the guarantees of superior customers based on future cash flows, constructing a flexible guarantee screening system, enhancing external credit, and increasing the competitiveness of guarantees.

둘째, 본 발명은 현금지급능력모듈에서의 평가가 현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보를 구분하고 index를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, 정확하고 신뢰성 있는 현금지급능력의 평가 결과를 점수와 등급으로 얻을 수 있는 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 제공하는데 있다. Second, in the present invention, the evaluation in the cash payability module is performed by distinguishing cash flows, construction sites, borrowings and effective collateral, and combining indexes, so that accurate and reliable evaluation results of cash payability can be obtained in scores and grades. To provide a short-term payment capability assessment system.

셋째, 본 발명은 심사체크리스트모듈에서의 등급 조정이 심사체크와 심사필터링으로 구분하고 계량평가와 비계량평가를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, 심사체크리스트모듈에서 최종등급을 조정할 수 있어 평가의 정확성을 제고할 수 있다. Third, the present invention is made by classifying the audit checklist module into audit check and audit filtering and combining quantitative evaluation and non-quantitative evaluation, so that the final grade can be adjusted in the audit checklist module to improve the accuracy of the evaluation. Can be.

넷째, 본 발명은 key man 평가모듈에서의 등급 조정에 Key Man 이탈율을 토대로 산출된 등급조정 결과를 결합하여 이루어짐으로써, key man 평가모듈에서 최종등급을 조정할 수 있다. Fourth, the present invention is made by combining the grade adjustment result calculated on the basis of the key man departure rate to the grade adjustment in the key man evaluation module, it is possible to adjust the final grade in the key man evaluation module.

도 1은 본 발명의 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 구성에 따른 흐름을 설명하기 위해 나타낸 도면.
도 2는 본 발명의 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 구성 중에서 현금지급능력모듈에서 평가하는 과정을 설명하기 위해 나타낸 도면.
도 3은 본 발명의 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 구성 중에서 key man 평가모듈과 심사체크리스트모듈에서 평가하는 과정을 설명하기 위해 나타낸 도면.
1 is a view showing for explaining the flow of the configuration of the short-term payment capacity evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 2 is a view showing for explaining the process of evaluating in the cash payment capacity module of the configuration of the short-term payment ability evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 3 is a view showing for explaining the process of evaluation in the key man evaluation module and the audit check list module of the configuration of the short-term payment ability evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

이하 첨부된 도면과 함께 본 발명의 바람직한 실시예를 살펴보면 다음과 같은데, 본 발명을 설명함에 있어서 관련된 공지기술 또는 구성에 대한 구체적인 설명이 본 발명의 요지를 불필요하게 흐릴 수 있다고 판단되는 경우에는 그 상세한 설명은 생략할 것이며, 후술되는 용어들은 본 발명에서의 기능을 고려하여 정의된 용어들로서 이는 사용자, 운용자의 의도 또는 관례 등에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로, 그 정의는 본 발명인 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 설명하는 본 명세서 전반에 걸친 내용을 토대로 내려져야 할 것이다.Looking at the preferred embodiment of the present invention together with the accompanying drawings as follows, when it is determined that the detailed description of the known art or configuration related to the present invention may unnecessarily obscure the subject matter of the present invention The description will be omitted, and the terms to be described below are terms defined in consideration of functions in the present invention, which may vary according to intentions or customs of users or operators, and the definitions thereof are used to describe the short-term payment ability evaluation system of the present invention. It should be made based on the contents throughout the specification.

이하, 첨부된 도면을 참조하여 본 발명의 바람직한 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 상세하게 설명한다.Hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings will be described in detail the short-term payment capacity evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

도 1은 본 발명의 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 구성에 따른 흐름을 설명하기 위해 나타낸 도면이고, 도 2는 본 발명의 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 구성 중에서 현금지급능력모듈에서 평가하는 과정을 설명하기 위해 나타낸 도면이며, 도 3은 본 발명의 일실시예에 따른 단기지급능력 평가시스템의 구성 중에서 key man 평가모듈과 심사체크리스트모듈에서 평가하는 과정을 설명하기 위해 나타낸 도면이다. 1 is a view showing a flow according to the configuration of the short-term payment ability evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention, Figure 2 is a cash payment in the configuration of the short-term payment capacity evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention 3 is a view illustrating a process of evaluating in the capability module, and FIG. 3 illustrates a process of evaluating in the key man evaluation module and the audit checklist module in the configuration of the short-term payment ability evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The figure shown.

도 1 내지 도 3에 도시한 바와 같이, 본 발명인 단기지급능력 평가시스템은 현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보여력을 구분한 평가자료를 토대로 하여 평가한 결과에 각 개별 항목의 index를 결합하여 현금지급능력모듈에서 index가 결합된 평가결과를 현금지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 현금지급능력모듈(100)과; 분기 내 퇴직 Key Man 수를 전 분기 Key Man 수로 나눈 값인 Key Man 이탈율을 적용하여 산출된 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 key man 평가모듈에서 Key Man 등급조정부로 전송하는 Key Man 평가 모듈(200)과; 공사기간비율과 본사관리비비율과 공사현장비율과 직불비율과 여건보고 비율을 종합하여 평가하는 계량평가와, 유찰경력과 원도급 낙찰율과 공사지연 및 중단 사유를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사체크부와; 단기연체로 인한 부도소문과 출자증권의 가압류 사항과 단기연체 여부와 현장의 가압류 여부를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사필터링부를 포함하며, 계량평가와 비계량평가의 평가자료를 토대로 평가한 결과를 심사체크리스트모듈에서 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부로 전송하는 심사체크리스트모듈(300)과; 상기 현금지급능력모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 현금지급능력 평가등급부(150)와; 상기 key man 평가모듈로부터 전송받은 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 Key Man 등급조정부(250)와; 상기 심사체크리스트모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부(350, 360)와; 상기 Key Man 등급조정부의 등급 조정을 위한 정보와, 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부의 평가결과를 전송받은 후 최종 등급을 조정하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 최종 등급조정부(400)와; 상기 현금지급능력 평가등급부의 평가결과와, 최종 등급조정부의 조정된 최종 등급을 전송받고 단기지급능력 평가등급을 정하는 단기지급능력 평가등급부(500); 을 구비한다.As shown in Figures 1 to 3, the inventors' short-term payment capacity evaluation system by combining the index of each individual item to the evaluation results based on the evaluation data that separates the cash flow and construction sites, borrowings and effective collateral capacity A cash dispensing capability module 100 which transmits the evaluation result combined with the index in the cash dispensing capability module to the cash dispensing ability evaluation grade part; A key man evaluation module 200 which transmits information for adjustment of a rating, which is calculated by applying a key man departure rate, which is a value obtained by dividing the number of retirement key men in a quarter by the number of previous key men, from a key man evaluation module to a key man rating adjustment unit; An assessment check that consists of a valuation evaluation that evaluates the construction period ratio, the headquarters management ratio, the construction equipment ratio, the debit ratio, and the condition reporting ratio. Wealth; It includes a screening filtering unit that consists of non-quantitative assessments that comprehensively evaluate default reports of short-term delinquency and investment securities and whether or not short-term delinquency and on-site pressurization are included. An audit checklist module 300 for transmitting the audit checklist module from the audit checklist module to the audit check and audit filtering grade adjusting unit; A cash payment capability evaluation unit 150 for transmitting the evaluation result received from the cash payment capability module to the short-term payment capability evaluation unit; A key man grading unit 250 which transmits information for grading received from the key man evaluation module to a final grading unit; An audit check and an audit filtering grade adjuster 350 or 360 configured to transmit the evaluation result received from the audit check list module to a final grade adjuster; A final grade adjusting unit 400 for adjusting the final grade after receiving the information for the grade adjustment of the key man grade adjusting unit and the evaluation result of the evaluation check and the filtering filtering grade adjusting unit and transmitting the final grade to the short-term payment ability evaluation grade unit; A short-term payment capacity evaluation grade unit 500 for receiving the evaluation result of the cash payment capacity evaluation grade unit and the adjusted final grade of the final rating adjustment unit to determine a short-term payment ability evaluation grade; Respectively.

상기 본 발명인 단기지급능력 평가시스템을 구성하는 각 기술적 수단들의 기능을 설명하면 다음과 같다.Referring to the function of each of the technical means constituting the present inventors short-term payment capacity evaluation system as follows.

상기 현금지급능력모듈(100)은 현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보여력을 구분한 평가자료를 토대로 하여 평가한 결과에 각 개별 항목의 index를 결합하여 현금지급능력모듈에서 index가 결합된 평가결과를 현금지급능력 평가등급부(150)로 전송하는 것이다. The cash disability capability module 100 combines the index of each individual item with the evaluation result based on the evaluation data that separates cash flows, construction sites, borrowings, and effective collateral. The result is to transmit to the cash payability rating unit 150.

여기서, 상기 현금지급능력모듈(100)은 현금흐름 평가부(110)와, 공사현장평가부(120)와, 차입금 평가부(130)와, 유효담보여력 평가부(140)를 포함한다.Here, the cash payment capability module 100 includes a cash flow evaluation unit 110, construction site evaluation unit 120, borrowings evaluation unit 130, and effective collateral capacity evaluation unit 140.

상기 현금흐름 평가부(110)는 3개월의 예금 평잔을 활용한 예금평잔 비율을 적용하여 현금의 흐름을 평가하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 현금흐름은 B/S 현금 및 예금을 포함하는 것이다.The cash flow evaluation unit 110 is to evaluate the flow of cash by applying the ratio of the deposit balance using the three-month deposit balance. Here, the cash flows include B / S cash and deposits.

상기 공사현장평가부(120)는 현재의 기성청구액에서 미지급금을 차감한 공사수지 현황과, 매출채권의 회전기간과, 매입채무의 회전기간을 고려한 잠재적인 현금흐름과, 미래발생예정 공사수입에서 미래발생예정 공사비용을 차감한 공사수지 현황인 공사현황자료를 통한 현금흐름에 index 결합하여 공사현장을 평가하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 공사현장의 평가에서의 현금은 입금되는 현금과 지출되는 현금으로 구분되는데, 입금되는 현금으로는 계약금액과, 기성금액과, 기성회수액이 있고, 지출되는 현금으로는 장비대, 노무대. 본사관리비를 포함하는 비용발생액과, 비용미지급액이 있다.The construction site evaluation unit 120 calculates the current state of the balance of the work, which is deducted from the current outstanding bill, the potential cash flow considering the revolving period of the trade receivables, the revolving period of the trade receivables, and the future revenue from the project's future revenues. The construction site is evaluated by combining the index with cash flows through the construction status data, which is the current state of the balance of payments. Here, the cash in the evaluation of the construction site is divided into cash deposited and cash spent, and the cash deposited is the contract amount, the established amount, the amount of ready-to-recovery amount, and the cash spent is equipment equipment, labor-management stage. . There are expenses incurred including headquarters management expenses and unpaid expenses.

상기 차입금 평가부(130)는 차입금의 상환능력과, 차입금의 변동성에 해당하는 신용공여정보를 기반으로 index 결합하여 차입금 상환능력을 평가하며, 부가세 정보의 매출과 매입, 차입금을 연계하여 영업으로 차입금을 상환할 수 있는 여력을 분석하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 신용공여정보에 해당하는 차입금의 종류는 장, 단기 차입금 원금 및 이자를 포함하는 것이다.The borrowing evaluation unit 130 evaluates the borrowing ability by combining indexes based on the repayment ability of the borrowings and credit loan information corresponding to the volatility of the borrowings, and connects sales, purchases and borrowings of VAT information to borrowings into business. Analyzing the affordability to repay. Here, the type of borrowing corresponding to the credit grant information includes long-term, short-term borrowing principal and interest.

상기 유효담보여력 평가부(140)와; 유효담보와 관련한 신용공여정보에 유효담보 비율을 적용하여 유효담보여력을 평가하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 신용공여정보에 해당하는 담보의 종류는 개인과 법인으로 구분되며, 부동산, 동산, 유가증권, 채권, 보증서를 포함하는 것이다.The effective collateral capacity evaluation unit 140; The effective mortgage capacity is assessed by applying the ratio of effective collateral to credit information related to effective collateral. Here, the types of collaterals corresponding to the credit grant information are classified into individuals and corporations, and include real estate, real estate, securities, bonds, and guarantees.

Figure 112012104081214-pat00001
Figure 112012104081214-pat00001

상기 표 1에 도시한 바와 같이, 현금지급능력 결합가중치는 현금흐름인 경우는 0.1, 공사현장인 경우는 0.4, 차입금인 경우는 0.3, 유효담보인 경우는 0.2로 결합가중치를 부여하고, 이를 적용하여 현금지급능력의 결합점수는 부진은 5, 미흡은 4, 보통은 3, 양호는 2, 우량은 1의 index의 숫자로 나타내는 것이다.As shown in Table 1, the cash flows combined weighting value is 0.1 for cash flow, 0.4 for construction sites, 0.3 for borrowings, and 0.2 for effective collateral, and the combined weight is applied. Therefore, the combined score of cash disbursement ability is represented by the index of 5, poor, 4, normal 3, good 2, 1 for poor.

상기 Key Man 평가 모듈(200)은 Key Man 이탈율을 적용하여 산출된 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 key man 평가모듈(200)에서 Key Man 등급조정부(250)로 전송하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 key man 평가모듈(200)에서 적용되는 Key Man 이탈율은 분기 내 퇴직 Key Man 수를 전 분기 Key Man 수로 나눈 값인 것이다. 또한 상기 Key Man 등급조정부(250)의 Key Man 이탈율을 토대로 산출된 등급조정 결과를 심사자 단말기(미도시)를 통해 등급조정 적용여부가 결정된 후 최종 등급조정부(400)로 전송되는 것이다.The key man evaluation module 200 transmits the information for adjusting the grade calculated by applying the key man departure rate from the key man evaluation module 200 to the key man rating adjusting unit 250. Here, the key man departure rate applied in the key man evaluation module 200 is a value obtained by dividing the number of retirement key men in the quarter by the number of previous quarter key men. In addition, the grade adjustment result calculated based on the key man departure rate of the key man grader 250 is determined through an examiner terminal (not shown), and then is transmitted to the final grader 400.

상기 심사체크리스트모듈(300)은 심사체크와 심사필터링으로 구분하여 계량평가와 비계량평가의 평가자료를 토대로 평가한 결과를 심사체크리스트모듈에서 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부로 전송하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 심사체크리스트모듈(300)은 공사기간비율과 본사관리비비율과 공사현장비율과 직불비율과 여건보고 비율을 종합하여 평가하는 계량평가와, 유찰경력과 원도급 낙찰율과 공사지연 및 중단 사유를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사체크 등급조정부(350)와; 단기연체로 인한 부도소문과 출자증권의 가압류 사항과 단기연체 여부와 현장의 가압류 여부를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사필터링 등급조정부(360); 을 포함하는 것이다.The audit checklist module 300 divides the audit check and the audit filtering into the audit check list module and transmits the evaluation result based on the evaluation data of the quantitative evaluation and the non-quantitative evaluation to the audit check and the audit filtering grade adjusting unit. Here, the audit checklist module 300 is a quantitative evaluation to evaluate the construction period ratio, the headquarters management ratio ratio, construction equipment ratio, debit ratio and condition reporting ratio, and the history of bidding, subcontracting bidding and construction delays and reasons for interruption An audit check grade adjustment unit 350 composed of non-quantitative evaluations to be comprehensively evaluated; Audit filtering grade adjustment unit 360 consisting of a non-quantitative evaluation to evaluate the default rulings of the default due to short-term delinquency and investment securities, and whether or not short-term delinquency and on-site pressurization; .

상기 현금지급능력 등급평가부(150)는 상기 현금지급능력모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 것이다.The cash pay ability rating unit 150 transmits the evaluation result received from the cash pay ability module to the short term pay ability evaluation unit.

상기 Key Man 등급조정부(250)는 상기 key man 평가모듈로부터 전송받은 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 것이다.The key man grading unit 250 transmits information for grading received from the key man evaluation module to the final grading unit.

상기 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부(350, 360)는 상기 심사체크리스트모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 것이다.The audit check and the audit filtering grade adjusting unit 350 and 360 transmit the evaluation result received from the audit check list module to the final grade adjusting unit.

상기 최종 등급조정부(400)는 상기 Key Man 등급조정부의 등급 조정을 위한 정보와, 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부의 평가결과를 전송받은 후 최종 등급을 조정하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 것이다. 여기서, 상기 최종 등급조정부(400)에서는 최종심사 등급조정부(370)의 최종심사 등급조정과, Key Man 등급조정부(250)의 Key Man 등급조정 중에서 보수적인 것을 반영하고, 상기 최종심사 등급조정부(370)에서는 심사체크 등급조정부(350)의 심사체크 등급조정과, 심사필터링 등급조정부(360)의 심사필터링 등급조정 중에서 현금지급능력 평가등급을 보다 하향시키는 결과를 우선적으로 반영하는 보수적인 방법을 적용한다.The final grader 400 receives the information for the grade adjustment of the Key Man grader and the evaluation result of the audit check and the audit filtering grader, and then adjusts the final grade and transmits the final grade to the short-term payability evaluation grade unit. Here, the final grading unit 400 reflects a conservative one of the final judging grade adjustment of the final judging grade adjusting unit 370 and the key man grading adjustment of the key man grade adjusting unit 250, and the final judging grade adjusting unit 370. ) Applies the conservative method that first reflects the result of lowering the cash payment ability evaluation grade among the audit check grade adjustment of the audit check grade adjusting unit 350 and the audit filtering grade adjustment of the audit filtering grade adjusting unit 360. .

상기 단기지급능력 평가등급부(500)는 상기 현금지급능력 평가등급부의( 평가결과와, 최종 등급조정부의 조정된 최종 등급을 전송받고 단기지급능력 평가등급을 정하는 것이다.The short-term payment ability evaluation rating unit 500 is to determine the short-term payment capacity evaluation rating by receiving the cash payment capacity evaluation rating of the evaluation results (evaluation result and the final adjusted final rating of the final rating adjustment unit.

이상에서 설명한 바와 같이, 본 발명이 속하는 기술 분야에서 통상의 지식을 가진 자가 본 발명의 기술적 사상을 벗어나지 않는 범위 내에서 여러 가지 치환, 변형 및 변경이 가능하므로 전술한 실시예 및 첨부된 도면에 한정되는 것은 아니다.It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. It is not.

상술한 바와 같이, 본 발명인 단기지급능력 평가시스템은 금융기관과 연계된 평가분야에 폭 넓게 적용할 수 있는 것이다. As described above, the present inventors can apply the short-term payment ability evaluation system to a wide range of evaluation fields associated with financial institutions.

100 : 현금지급능력모듈 110 : 현금흐름 평가부
120 : 공사현장 평가부 130 : 차입금 평가부
140 : 유효담보여력 평가부 150 : 현금지급능력 평가등급부
200 : Key Man 평가 모듈 250 : Key Man 등급조정부
300 : 심사체크리스트모듈 310 : 심사체크부
320 : 심사필터링부 350 : 심사체크 등급조정부
360 : 심사필터링 등급조정부 370 : 최종심사 등급조정부
400 : 최종 등급조정부 500 : 단기지급능력 평가등급부
100: cash payable module 110: cash flow evaluation unit
120: construction site evaluation unit 130: borrowings evaluation unit
140: effective collateral capacity evaluation unit 150: cash payment ability evaluation unit
200: Key Man Evaluation Module 250: Key Man Grading
300: Audit check list module 310: Audit check unit
320: screening filtering unit 350: screening check grade adjustment unit
360: Evaluation Filter Grading Unit 370: Final Evaluation Grading Unit
400: Final rating adjustment part 500: Short-term payment ability evaluation part

Claims (6)

단기지급능력 평가시스템에 있어서,
현금흐름과 공사현장과 차입금과 유효담보여력을 구분한 평가자료를 토대로 하여 평가한 결과에 각 개별 항목의 index를 결합하여 현금지급능력모듈에서 index가 결합된 평가결과를 현금지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 현금지급능력모듈과;
분기 내 퇴직 Key Man 수를 전 분기 Key Man 수로 나눈 값인 Key Man 이탈율을 적용하여 산출된 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 key man 평가모듈에서 Key Man 등급조정부로 전송하는 Key Man 평가 모듈과;
공사기간비율과 본사관리비비율과 공사현장비율과 직불비율과 여건보고 비율을 종합하여 평가하는 계량평가와, 유찰경력과 원도급 낙찰율과 공사지연 및 중단 사유를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사체크부와; 단기연체로 인한 부도소문과 출자증권의 가압류 사항과 단기연체 여부와 현장의 가압류 여부를 종합하여 평가하는 비계량평가로 구성되는 심사필터링부를 포함하며, 계량평가와 비계량평가의 평가자료를 토대로 평가한 결과를 심사체크리스트모듈에서 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부로 전송하는 심사체크리스트모듈과;
상기 현금지급능력모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 현금지급능력 평가등급부와;
상기 key man 평가모듈로부터 전송받은 등급 조정을 위한 정보를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 Key Man 등급조정부와;
상기 심사체크리스트모듈로부터 전송받은 평가결과를 최종 등급조정부로 전송하는 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부와;
상기 Key Man 등급조정부의 등급 조정을 위한 정보와, 심사체크 및 심사필터링 등급조정부의 평가결과를 전송받은 후 최종 등급을 조정하여 단기지급능력 평가등급부로 전송하는 최종 등급조정부와;
상기 현금지급능력 평가등급부의 평가결과와, 최종 등급조정부의 조정된 최종 등급을 전송받고 단기지급능력 평가등급을 정하는 단기지급능력 평가등급부; 을 포함함을 특징으로 하는 단기지급능력 평가시스템.
In the short-term payment ability evaluation system,
Based on the evaluation data that separates cash flows, construction sites, borrowings, and effective collateral, the index of each individual item is combined and the evaluation results combined with the indexes in the cash payability module are transferred to the cash payability assessment department. A cash payment capability module;
A key man evaluation module configured to transmit information for adjustment of a rating, which is calculated by applying a key man departure rate, which is a value obtained by dividing the number of retirement key men in a quarter by the number of key men in the previous quarter, from a key man evaluation module to a key man rating adjustment unit;
An assessment check that consists of a valuation evaluation that evaluates the construction period ratio, the headquarters management ratio, the construction equipment ratio, the debit ratio, and the condition reporting ratio. Wealth; It includes a screening filtering unit that consists of non-quantitative assessments that comprehensively assess the default rumors due to short-term delinquency, investment securities, and whether or not short-term delinquency and on-site pressurization are included. An audit checklist module for transmitting the audit checklist module to the audit check and audit filtering grade adjusting unit;
A cash payment capability evaluation unit for transmitting the evaluation result received from the cash payment capability module to the short-term payment ability evaluation unit;
A key man rating controller for transmitting the rating information received from the key man evaluation module to a final rating controller;
An audit check and an audit filtering grade adjuster which transmits the evaluation result received from the audit check list module to a final grade adjuster;
A final grade adjusting unit for adjusting the final grade after receiving information for adjusting the grade of the key man grade adjusting unit and the evaluation result of the audit check and the filtering filtering grade adjusting unit, and transmitting the final grade to the short-term payment ability evaluation grade unit;
A short-term payment ability evaluation rating unit for receiving the evaluation result of the cash payment ability evaluation rating unit and the adjusted final rating of the final rating adjustment unit and determining a short-term payment ability evaluation rating; Short-term payment capacity evaluation system, characterized in that it comprises a.
제 1항에 있어서,
상기 현금지급능력모듈은 3개월의 예금 평잔을 활용한 예금평잔 비율을 적용하여 현금의 보유 및 현금구조를 평가하는 현금흐름 평가부와; 현재의 기성청구액에서 미지급금을 차감한 공사수지 현황과, 매출채권의 회전기간과, 매입채무의 회전기간을 고려한 잠재적인 현금흐름과, 미래발생예정 공사수입에서 미래발생예정 공사비용을 차감한 공사수지 현황인 공사현황자료를 통한 현금흐름에 index 결합하여 공사현장을 평가하는 공사현장평가부와; 차입금의 상환능력과, 차입금의 변동성에 해당하는 신용공여정보를 index 결합하여 차입금을 평가하며, 부가세 정보의 매출과 매입, 차입금을 연계하여 영업으로 차입금을 상환할 수 있는 여력을 분석하는 차입금 평가부와; 유효담보와 관련한 신용공여정보에 유효담보 비율을 적용하여 유효담보여력을 평가하는 유효담보여력 평가부; 을 포함함을 특징으로 하는 단기지급능력 평가시스템.
The method of claim 1,
The cash disability capability module includes a cash flow evaluator for evaluating holding and cash structure of cash by applying a ratio of a deposit balance using a 3 month deposit balance; Construction balances less current payables, current account recurring periods, potential cash flows taking into account retirement periods, and reversal periods of trade receivables, and future expenditures from future revenues A construction site evaluation unit for evaluating construction sites by indexing cash flows through construction status data; Borrowing evaluation unit that evaluates borrowings by indexing the ability to repay borrowings and credit information corresponding to the volatility of borrowings, and analyzes the ability to repay borrowings by operating sales, purchases and borrowings of VAT information. Wow; Effective collateral capacity evaluation unit for evaluating effective collateral capacity by applying the ratio of effective collateral to credit loan information related to the effective collateral; Short-term payment capacity evaluation system, characterized in that it comprises a.
삭제delete 제 1항에 있어서,
상기 Key Man 등급조정부의 Key Man 이탈율을 토대로 산출된 등급조정 결과를 심사자 단말기를 통해 등급조정 적용여부가 결정된 후 최종 등급조정부로 전송되는 것을 특징으로 하는 단기지급능력 평가시스템.
The method of claim 1,
The short-term payability evaluation system, characterized in that the rating adjustment results calculated based on the key man departure rate of the key man rating adjustment unit is determined through the examiner terminal is transmitted to the final rating adjustment unit.
삭제delete 제 1항에 있어서,
상기 최종 등급조정부에서는 최종심사 등급조정부의 최종심사 등급조정과, Key Man 등급조정부의 Key Man 등급조정 중에서 현금지급능력 평가등급부에서 산출된 현금지급능력 평가등급을 보다 하향할 수 있는 방안을 적용하고, 상기 최종심사 등급조정부에서는 심사체크 등급조정부의 심사체크 등급조정과, 심사필터링 등급조정부의 심사필터링 등급조정 중에서 현금지급능력 평가등급부에서 산출된 현금지급능력 평가등급을 보다 하향할 수 있는 보수적인 방안을 적용하는 것을 특징으로 하는 단기지급능력 평가시스템.
The method of claim 1,
The final rating adjuster applies a method to further lower the cash payability rating rating calculated by the cash payability rating rating section among the final review rating adjustment section of the final review rating adjustment section and key man rating adjustment section of the key review section. In addition, the final audit rating adjustment unit is more conservative in order to further lower the cash payment ability evaluation rating calculated by the cash payment ability evaluation rating from the audit check rating adjustment of the audit check rating adjustment and the audit filtering rating adjustment of the audit filtering rating adjustment. A short-term payment capacity evaluation system characterized by applying the method.
KR1020120146008A 2012-12-14 2012-12-14 A short-term solvency evaluation system KR101326177B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020120146008A KR101326177B1 (en) 2012-12-14 2012-12-14 A short-term solvency evaluation system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020120146008A KR101326177B1 (en) 2012-12-14 2012-12-14 A short-term solvency evaluation system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR101326177B1 true KR101326177B1 (en) 2013-11-07

Family

ID=49856954

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020120146008A KR101326177B1 (en) 2012-12-14 2012-12-14 A short-term solvency evaluation system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR101326177B1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109523194A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-03-26 深圳市小柠檬教育科技有限公司 Chinese reading capability comparison method, apparatus and readable storage medium storing program for executing
KR20200111064A (en) * 2019-03-18 2020-09-28 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation
KR20200111076A (en) * 2019-03-18 2020-09-28 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 Calculation System for Corporate Debt Payment Capability
KR20200111518A (en) * 2019-03-19 2020-09-29 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation Including Evaluation Model Based On AI Using Commerce Data
CN112308670A (en) * 2020-10-30 2021-02-02 上海东方投资监理有限公司 Cloud pricing method, system, device and storage medium

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002097574A2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-05 General Electric Company Methods and systems for portfolio cash flow valuation
KR100712050B1 (en) * 2006-04-25 2007-05-02 연세대학교 산학협력단 Management method for risk in construction using analysis of cash flow and apparatus threrof, and management method for risk in construction using analysis of portfolio and apparatus threrof using that
KR20070089326A (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-31 서민철 Qualified score and perect score construction money diagnosis electronic bid program
KR100932313B1 (en) * 2007-05-29 2009-12-16 주식회사 신한은행 Method and system for evaluating object finance and recording medium therefor
KR20120123858A (en) * 2011-05-02 2012-11-12 구경환 System and method for diagnosing financial status, and a medium having a computer readable program for executing the method

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002097574A2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-05 General Electric Company Methods and systems for portfolio cash flow valuation
KR20070089326A (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-31 서민철 Qualified score and perect score construction money diagnosis electronic bid program
KR100712050B1 (en) * 2006-04-25 2007-05-02 연세대학교 산학협력단 Management method for risk in construction using analysis of cash flow and apparatus threrof, and management method for risk in construction using analysis of portfolio and apparatus threrof using that
KR100932313B1 (en) * 2007-05-29 2009-12-16 주식회사 신한은행 Method and system for evaluating object finance and recording medium therefor
KR20120123858A (en) * 2011-05-02 2012-11-12 구경환 System and method for diagnosing financial status, and a medium having a computer readable program for executing the method

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109523194A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-03-26 深圳市小柠檬教育科技有限公司 Chinese reading capability comparison method, apparatus and readable storage medium storing program for executing
CN109523194B (en) * 2018-12-14 2021-06-01 深圳市小柠檬教育科技有限公司 Chinese reading ability evaluation method and device and readable storage medium
KR20200111064A (en) * 2019-03-18 2020-09-28 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation
KR20200111076A (en) * 2019-03-18 2020-09-28 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 Calculation System for Corporate Debt Payment Capability
KR102249028B1 (en) * 2019-03-18 2021-05-06 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation
KR102249015B1 (en) * 2019-03-18 2021-05-06 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 Calculation System for Corporate Debt Payment Capability
KR20200111518A (en) * 2019-03-19 2020-09-29 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation Including Evaluation Model Based On AI Using Commerce Data
KR102246782B1 (en) * 2019-03-19 2021-04-29 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation Including Evaluation Model Based On AI Using Commerce Data
CN112308670A (en) * 2020-10-30 2021-02-02 上海东方投资监理有限公司 Cloud pricing method, system, device and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20180012300A1 (en) System and method for resolving transactions with lump sum payment capabilities
US8706615B2 (en) Systems and methods for evaluating the ability of borrowers to repay loans
Stavárek et al. Theory of financial integration and achievements in the European Union
KR102316203B1 (en) Electronic bill mediation system and method thereof
KR101326177B1 (en) A short-term solvency evaluation system
US20130246303A1 (en) Corporate actions automation system and method
Bhutta et al. Money in the Bank? Assessing Families' Liquid Savings using the Survey of Consumer Finances
Alfaro et al. Granular corporate hedging under dominant currency
Herbst-Murphy Clearing and settlement of interbank card transactions: A mastercard tutorial for federal reserve payments analysts
Adams Do Marketplace Lending Platforms Offer Lower Rates to Consumers?
Negrea et al. The digital Leu challenges and possible areas of implementation
Smrcka et al. Receivables management and possible use of information technologies
US8249963B1 (en) Method for providing comprehensive ACH vendor services
Bowman Historical proxies for the secured overnight financing rate
JP4875720B2 (en) Credit rating device
Hou et al. Effects of fixed nominal thresholds for enhanced supervision
de Jager et al. A commentary on SARS’proposed fair value tax on financial instruments
Maer The role of cost analysis in building payment systems
Cardozo-Ortiz et al. Financial Infrastructure Report 2022
Banka From cash to electronic payments: Microeconomic, macroeconomic, and policy aspects of retail payment systems
Darst et al. Private Firm Repayment Vulnerabilities and Adverse Economic Conditions
General Audit Report
Alwazir et al. Declines in correspondent banking in the small states of the Pacific 1
Plan State Bank of India
Chiaramonte et al. The New International Liquidity Regulatory Framework for Banks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
A302 Request for accelerated examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E90F Notification of reason for final refusal
E701 Decision to grant or registration of patent right
GRNT Written decision to grant
FPAY Annual fee payment

Payment date: 20161025

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Annual fee payment

Payment date: 20170908

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Annual fee payment

Payment date: 20190128

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Annual fee payment

Payment date: 20190916

Year of fee payment: 7