KR101018678B1 - Valuation method of business management and valuation system of business management for performing the valuation method - Google Patents

Abstract

Disclosed is a method for evaluating corporate management that can be more easily evaluated and a management evaluation system for performing the same. As a corporate management evaluation method, a company is first registered in a management evaluation system, and then management data is input into the management evaluation system and converted into execution data required for management evaluation analysis. The performance data is then analyzed within the management assessment system to derive a management assessment for the registered company. As such, after converting the management data into execution data necessary for management evaluation analysis and analyzing the execution data to derive management evaluation, it is easier for a company to receive management evaluation even through unstructured management data.

Management Evaluation System

Description

Method of evaluating corporate management on the web after reading the uploaded Excel financial data, extracting necessary data into variable values, and evaluating business management on the web THE VALUATION METHOD}

The present invention relates to a corporate management evaluation method and a management evaluation system for performing the same. More particularly, the present invention relates to a corporate management evaluation method capable of simply receiving a management evaluation of a company and a management evaluation system for performing the same.

In general, an enterprise refers to an organization that produces and sells goods or services for profit, and management is an activity that runs a company to pursue more profits. These companies need large amounts of money to carry out management activities, for example when they want to invest in new facilities or enter new businesses.

Firms can settle their own large amounts of funds, but they generally borrow and use money from financial institutions such as banks. In this case, it is common for the financial institution to determine whether to finance the company by analyzing the overall management evaluation, for example, profitability, financial soundness, management capability, business prospects, etc. of the company that wants to borrow money. In addition, it is also necessary for an enterprise to objectively evaluate the current state of management.

As described above, the management evaluation can be used as a data for determining how much money can be financed from financial institutions, and can play a decisive role in establishing future business plans and management strategies. After all, the management evaluation is very important and necessary data for the company.

However, getting a business evaluation from a company's point of view is not trivial. First of all, a company needs to refer to a management evaluation agency for management evaluation, which is more expensive than expected.

In addition, when the company requests management evaluation from the specialized management evaluation institution, it is necessary to submit various data necessary for the professional management evaluation institution. That is, the company may have a problem that it takes a considerable time and effort to collect the various data.

Therefore, general companies, especially SMEs, may not be able to receive the management evaluation of the current management status.

Accordingly, the present invention has been derived to solve the above problems, the first problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a corporate management evaluation method that can be easily and cheaply evaluated management from the corporate perspective.

The second problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a management evaluation system suitable for performing the corporate management evaluation method.

In the enterprise management evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, a company is first registered in the management evaluation system. Subsequently, management data for the company is input into the management evaluation system, and the management data is converted into execution data required for management evaluation analysis. Subsequently, the performance data is analyzed in the management evaluation system to derive a management evaluation of the company.

The registering of the enterprise may include registering a member in the management evaluation system by the company and inputting basic information about the company into the management evaluation system, wherein the cache for use of the management evaluation system is included. The method may further include charging a cash and paying the cache after inputting the basic information.

The management data may include qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, and the execution data may include execution qualitative data corresponding to the qualitative data and execution qualitative data corresponding to the quantitative data.

The step of inputting the management data into the execution data comprises inputting the qualitative data substantially the same as the execution qualitative data into the management evaluation system, uploading a data file including the quantitative data into the management evaluation system. (up-loading), and converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data. Here, as a method of inputting the qualitative data, the grade can be evaluated by itself through a check list for each sector in the management evaluation system.

The checklist items include management checklists including checklists for basic management, finance, production, sales, human resources, organization, labor and office, and business, technical, competitive, managerial and reliability. And a feasibility checklist that includes a checklist for the information.

The quantitative data may include data in general status and financial statements for the company, and the financial statement may include a balance sheet, an income statement and a manufacturing cost statement for the company.

On the other hand, as a method of converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data, it is possible to form the execution quantitative data by extracting data necessary for management evaluation analysis in the management evaluation system from the quantitative data.

The converting of the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data may include analyzing a worksheet number of pages and a number of cells in each worksheet from the uploaded data file. The method may further include reading the data in cell units and storing the data in a variable in its own memory, and extracting data for management evaluation from the variables stored in the memory to form the execution quantitative data.

Analyzing the execution data and deriving the management evaluation may include analyzing the execution data to form intermediate qualitative data and intermediate quantitative data, and finally performing the management evaluation using the intermediate qualitative data and the intermediate quantitative data. It may include the step of deriving.

The intermediate qualitative data includes first intermediate aggregate data including analysis data for the basic management, financial, production, sales, and human resources organizations, and analysis data for business, technology, competitiveness, management, and reliability. It may include a second intermediate aggregate data, wherein the intermediate quantitative data and the third intermediate aggregate data including the analysis data for the management basic sector, finance, production, sales and human resources, organization, labor And fourth interim aggregate data including analytical data on revenue, payability, vitality, endurance and growth. In addition, the management evaluation may include a credit rating evaluation, problems in the current management status and improvement tasks for solving the problems.

The corporate management evaluation method may further include re-evaluating the management of the enterprise by modifying the execution management data after confirming the management evaluation.

Management evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a main control unit and a data storage unit.

The main control unit receives management data for a registered company, converts the management data into execution data required for management evaluation analysis, and analyzes the execution data to derive a management evaluation for the company. The data storage unit receives and stores the management data or the execution data from the main control unit, and provides the stored management data or the execution data to the main control unit.

The management data may include qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, and the execution data may include execution qualitative data substantially the same as the qualitative data and execution quantitative data extracted from the quantitative data.

According to the present invention, a company inputs unstructured management data into a management evaluation system, and the management evaluation system automatically converts the management data into execution data required for management evaluation analysis to derive a management evaluation of the company. Accordingly, the enterprise can be easily and conveniently evaluated management.

In addition, when the company registers in the management evaluation system, if only a certain amount of expenses can be received the management evaluation in a short time, the cost and time required to receive the management evaluation can be further reduced.

As the inventive concept allows for various changes and numerous embodiments, particular embodiments will be illustrated in the drawings and described in detail in the text. However, this is not intended to limit the present invention to the specific disclosed form, it should be understood to include all modifications, equivalents, and substitutes included in the spirit and scope of the present invention.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. In this application, the terms "comprise" or "having" are intended to indicate that there is a feature, number, step, action, component, part, or combination thereof described in the specification, and that one or more other features It should be understood that it does not exclude in advance the possibility of the presence or addition of numbers, steps, actions, components, parts or combinations thereof.

Unless defined otherwise, all terms used herein, including technical or scientific terms, have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.

Terms such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries are to be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with the meaning in the context of the relevant art and are to be interpreted as ideal or overly formal in meaning unless explicitly defined in the present application Do not.

Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating corporate management according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, the method for evaluating corporate management according to the present embodiment may largely include four steps. First, the company is registered in the management evaluation system (S 100). Second, input management data for the company registered in the management evaluation system, and converts the management data into execution data required for management evaluation analysis (S 200). Third, by analyzing the management data entered into the management evaluation system to derive a management evaluation for the company (S 300). Finally, the derived management evaluation is output to the outside (S 400). Hereinafter, each step will be described in detail using separate drawings.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a step of registering a company in the corporate management evaluation method of FIG. 1.

Referring to FIG. 2, the first step S 100 of registering a company in the management evaluation system may include, for example, four steps in detail.

First, the company is a member in the management evaluation system (S 110). In general, the company can be registered as a member of the management evaluation system through online such as the Internet. As a result, a number of companies can be registered in the management evaluation system.

Subsequently, a cash required when using the management evaluation system is filled (S 120). In this case, the cache is an electric money used to use a program in a system on the Internet or the like.

Subsequently, basic information about the company is input into the management evaluation system (S 130). In this case, the basic information about the company may include general information about the company, such as company name, representative, company size, type of business, number of employees, company location.

Subsequently, at least a part of the cash filled in the management evaluation system is settled (S 140). That is, when the basic information about the company is inputted, it can be seen that the company is finally registered in the management evaluation system. After this registration, some or all of the previously charged caches are paid. As a result, the operator of the management evaluation system can generate revenue.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a step of inputting management data in the corporate management evaluation method of FIG. 1.

Referring to FIG. 3, the management data may include qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, and the execution data may include execution qualitative data corresponding to the qualitative data and execution quantitative data corresponding to the quantitative data. have.

In detail, the step of converting the management data into the execution data (S 200) may include inputting the qualitative data (S 210) and inputting the quantitative data (S 220). In FIG. 3, the qualitative data is input first and the quantitative data is input later. Alternatively, the quantitative data may be input first and the qualitative data may be input later.

First, in the method of inputting the qualitative data (S 210), the company may evaluate the grade by itself through a check list for each sector in the management evaluation system. Items of the check list may include a management check list and a business feasibility check list.

Specifically, the management checklist may include checklists for the basic management, financial, production, sales and personnel organizations.

The basic management section includes matters related to management, basic management policy, overall management plan, management organization, internal control, responsiveness, reliability, etc., and the financial section includes accounting organization, financial structure, capital management, profit management, accounting data. Includes information on usage. The production sector includes matters on production planning, process management, work management, quality control, workplace environment, equipment and technology management, heat and power management, outsourcing management, materials and purchasing management, inventory management, and the like. The sales segment includes matters such as sales planning, market research, product planning and pricing, advertising and sales promotion, salesperson management, sales route, sales organization, sales activity and business relationship. The human resources organization includes matters related to labor organization and personnel, recruitment and employment, promotion and transfer, working conditions, service rules (work rules), grievance procedures, payroll management, industrial relations, education and training development, and communication. Include.

In addition, the business feasibility checklist may include a checklist for business power, technology, competitiveness, management power, and reliability.

The business power sector includes information on marketability level, accessibility level, possibility of occurrence of substitutes, new product development capability level and business strategy level. It includes investment ratio, stability of technical personnel, and awards related to technology. The competitiveness includes matters such as the selection of promising SMEs, participation in equity investments such as start-up investment / financial companies, participation in technology development of the government and related institutions, location level, and human resource development level. The management power sector includes matters on the ability to respond to changes in management environment, to respond to changes in management structure, to respond to changes in management structure, to respond to management creative management, and to respond to improvements in financial structure. The reliability sector includes matters related to taxation and legal action, financial transaction regulation, commerce sanctions, property changes, and social issues.

On the other hand, the execution qualitative data required in the management evaluation system is substantially the same as the qualitative data input through the checklist. In other words, the qualitative data may be used as data for the management evaluation in the management evaluation system.

4 is a flowchart illustrating a step of inputting quantitative data among steps of inputting management data of FIG. 3.

Referring to FIG. 4, in the method of inputting the quantitative data (S 220), first, a data file including the quantitative data is uploaded into the management evaluation system (S 222), and then the quantitative data is executed in the quantitative manner. Convert to data (S224).

The data file is preferably an Excel file, but may be a data file in another format. Here, the quantitative data included in the data file is generally composed of unstructured data. That is, the quantitative data may be composed of data of a different format for each enterprise.

The quantitative data may include data in the general status and financial statements for the company. In this case, the financial statement may include a balance sheet, an income statement and a manufacturing cost statement for the company.

On the other hand, in the method for converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data (S 224), it is possible to form the execution quantitative data by extracting data necessary for management evaluation analysis in the management evaluation system from the quantitative data. . That is, since the quantitative data may not be data suitable for the management evaluation analysis, only the data necessary for the management evaluation analysis may be extracted from the quantitative data to form the execution quantitative data.

A method (S 224) of converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data will be described as an example. First, the number of worksheet sheets and the number of cells in each worksheet are analyzed from the uploaded data file. .

Subsequently, the character data in each worksheet is read in cell units, and the whole is stored in an array in a variable called CellData in its own memory. Here, it is preferable to delete unnecessary character data. On the other hand, the character data includes not only letters but also numbers and various other special characters. The unnecessary character data includes, for example, unnecessary data for management evaluation such as empty space, [,], ', ”, (,), and the like. it means.

Then, the data necessary for the management evaluation is found among the values stored in the variables in the memory. For example, to find data about the gross sales required for management evaluations, you retrieve a cell in a worksheet that contains the letters "Total Sales." If you find the data you want, store two numeric values in the cell (current and current amounts of total sales) in a variable. Store it inside. That is, after completing the first worksheet, proceeding to the second worksheet After the second worksheet is completed, the process proceeds to the repetitive repetition of the third worksheet. This conversion is a procedure for identifying which data is required for management evaluation among variables stored in the memory.

By repeatedly performing the method described above, the quantitative data can be converted into the execution quantitative data as a result. In this case, the data is preferably converted in a worksheet unit.

As described above, since unstructured quantitative data that is different for each company in the management evaluation system is automatically converted into execution quantitative data suitable for management evaluation analysis, the execution quantitative data does not need to be generated from the viewpoint of the enterprise.

5 is a view for explaining a step of analyzing management data of the corporate management evaluation method of FIG.

1 and 5, in the method of deriving the management evaluation by analyzing the execution data (S 300), the execution data is first analyzed to form intermediate qualitative data and intermediate quantitative data, and then the intermediate qualitative data. The management evaluation may be finally derived using the data and the intermediate quantitative data.

The intermediate qualitative data is data derived from the execution qualitative data and may include first and second intermediate aggregate data. The first intermediate aggregate data may include analytical data for the basic management, financial, production, sales, and human resources organizations, and the second intermediate aggregate data includes business, technical, competitive, managerial, and reliability. It may include second intermediate aggregate data that includes analytical data for.

The intermediate quantitative data is data derived from the performance qualitative data, and may include third and fourth intermediate aggregate data. The third intermediate aggregate data may include analytical data for the basic management, financial, production, sales and human resources departments, and the fourth intermediate aggregate data includes profitability, payment ability, vitality, endurance and growth power. It may include analytical data for.

The management evaluation is a final analysis evaluation result derived from the first to fourth interim aggregate data, credit rating evaluation for the company, problems in the current management state of the company, improvement tasks for solving the problem, etc. It may include.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a step of outputting a management evaluation in the corporate management evaluation method of FIG. 1.

Referring to FIG. 6, as a method of outputting the management evaluation (S 400), first, an analysis result of the management evaluation is confirmed (S 410), and upon confirmation of the analysis result, basic data is stored based on the uploaded financial statements. Analyze the value against accuracy. That is, it compares and analyzes the items of cells in each weeksheet and executes again if it is blank or empty. After completing the accuracy analysis, the value read the entire Excel file is stored in the database, and then the analysis result is converted into an Excel file, the report is displayed (expressed) in the corresponding list, and output through a monitor or a printer (S 420). Here, the output of the analysis result may output all the sections of the management evaluation to the outside, but may selectively output only the desired section of the management evaluation.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a state in which a step of asking whether to correct corporate information is added during the process of outputting the management evaluation of FIG. 6.

Referring to FIG. 7, in the step of outputting the management evaluation (S 400), after checking an analysis result of the management evaluation, determining whether to correct at least one of various information about the company (S 430). May be further included.

Specifically, it is determined whether there is an error in the analysis result by checking the analysis result of the management evaluation, and if it is determined that there is an error in the analysis result, the company information on the section in which the error is determined is corrected. (S 430).

When a part of the information on the company is modified, a new management evaluation is derived by re-analyzing through the revised management data (S 300). Here, if it is determined that there is no error in the analysis result for the new management evaluation (S 410, S 430), and outputs the analysis result to finish the corporate management evaluation method (S 420).

Hereinafter, a management evaluation system for performing the corporate management evaluation method described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 7 will be described in detail.

8 is a block diagram showing a management evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 8, the management evaluation system 100 may include a main controller 110 and a data storage unit 120.

The main control unit 110 receives the management data for the company from the computer 10 of the registered company, converts the management data into execution data necessary for management evaluation analysis, analyzes the execution data to the company Derive management evaluation That is, the main control unit 110 converts the unstructured management data, which is different from each other, into the standardized execution data required in the system, and the data control unit 112 that controls the input / output and flow of data such as the management data. The data conversion unit 114 and the data analysis unit 114 may analyze the execution data converted by the data conversion unit 114 to derive a management evaluation for the company. The derived management evaluation data may be transmitted to the corporate computer 10 and displayed to the operator of the corporate computer 10.

The data storage unit 120 receives the management data or the execution data from the main control unit 120 and stores the management data or the execution data. When the request is required from the main control unit 120, the stored management data or the execution data is stored. May be provided to the main controller. In addition, the data storage unit 120 may store an analysis result for the management evaluation derived from the data analysis unit 116.

Meanwhile, the management data may include qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, and the execution data may include execution qualitative data substantially the same as the qualitative data and execution quantitative data extracted from the quantitative data.

As described above, according to the present invention, a company uploads a file containing unstructured management data for each enterprise into a management evaluation system, and the management evaluation system converts itself from the management data into execution data necessary for management evaluation analysis. By deriving a management evaluation of a company, the company can be easily and conveniently received a management evaluation.

In addition, when the company registers in the management evaluation system, it is possible to receive the management evaluation in a short time with only the management data file owned by itself, as long as it only spends a certain cost. Therefore, the cost, time, effort, etc. required for the company to receive a management evaluation can be reduced as compared with the related art.

On the other hand, the management evaluation data derived from the management evaluation system can be used as a basis for the company's financial transaction performance evaluation, prior credit rating evaluation, management strategy and management plan, etc. It can help.

In the detailed description of the present invention described above with reference to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art or those skilled in the art having ordinary knowledge in the scope of the invention described in the claims to be described later And various modifications and variations of the present invention without departing from the scope of the art. Therefore, the above description and the drawings below should be construed as illustrating the present invention, not limiting the technical spirit of the present invention.

1 is a flowchart illustrating a corporate management evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a step of registering a company in the corporate management evaluation method of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a step of inputting management data in the corporate management evaluation method of FIG. 1.

4 is a flowchart illustrating a step of inputting quantitative data among steps of inputting management data of FIG. 3.

5 is a view for explaining a step of analyzing management data of the corporate management evaluation method of FIG.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a step of outputting a management evaluation in the corporate management evaluation method of FIG. 1.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a state in which a step of asking whether to correct corporate information is added during the process of outputting the management evaluation of FIG. 6.

8 is a block diagram showing a management evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

<Short Description of Main Drawing Numbers>

100: management evaluation system 110: main control unit

112: data controller 114: data converter

116: data analysis unit 120: data storage unit

Claims (16)

delete delete delete delete delete Registering the enterprise in the management evaluation system; Inputting management data for the enterprise into the management evaluation system and converting the management data into execution data required for management evaluation analysis; And Analyzing the execution data in the management evaluation system to derive a management evaluation for the enterprise, The management data includes qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, the execution data includes execution qualitative data corresponding to the qualitative data and execution quantitative data corresponding to the quantitative data, The step of converting the management data into the execution data is Inputting said qualitative data into said management evaluation system substantially the same as said executive qualitative data; Uploading a data file containing the quantitative data into the management evaluation system; And Converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data, Inputting the qualitative data And evaluating a grade through the checklist for each sector in the management evaluation system. The method of claim 6, wherein the item of the check list A management checklist including checklists for the basic management, finance, production, sales and human resources departments; And A business management evaluation method comprising a business checklist including a checklist on business competence, technical competence, competitiveness, management competence and reliability. delete delete delete Registering the enterprise in the management evaluation system; Inputting management data for the enterprise into the management evaluation system and converting the management data into execution data required for management evaluation analysis; And Analyzing the execution data in the management evaluation system to derive a management evaluation for the enterprise, The management data includes qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, the execution data includes execution qualitative data corresponding to the qualitative data and execution quantitative data corresponding to the quantitative data, The step of converting the management data into the execution data is Inputting said qualitative data into said management evaluation system substantially the same as said executive qualitative data; Uploading a data file containing the quantitative data into the management evaluation system; And Converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data, The step of converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data Analyzing the number of worksheet sheets and the number of cells in each worksheet from the uploaded data file; Reading all the character data of each worksheet in cell units and storing them in variables in its own memory; And Extracting data necessary for management evaluation from among variables stored in the memory to form the execution quantitative data. Registering the enterprise in the management evaluation system; Inputting management data for the enterprise into the management evaluation system and converting the management data into execution data required for management evaluation analysis; And Analyzing the execution data in the management evaluation system to derive a management evaluation for the enterprise, The management data includes qualitative data and quantitative data about the company, the execution data includes execution qualitative data corresponding to the qualitative data and execution quantitative data corresponding to the quantitative data, The step of converting the management data into the execution data is Inputting said qualitative data into said management evaluation system substantially the same as said executive qualitative data; Uploading a data file containing the quantitative data into the management evaluation system; And Converting the quantitative data into the execution quantitative data, Deriving the management evaluation by analyzing the execution data Analyzing the execution data to form intermediate qualitative data and intermediate quantitative data; And And finally deriving the management evaluation using the intermediate qualitative data and the intermediate quantitative data. The method of claim 12, wherein the intermediate qualitative data is First interim aggregate data, including analytical data for the basic business, financial, production, sales, and personnel departments; And Includes second interim aggregate data including analytical data on business, technical, competitive, managerial and credibility, The intermediate quantitative data is Third interim aggregate data, including analytical data for the basic business, financial, production, sales and personnel departments; And And a fourth interim aggregate data including analytical data on profitability, payability, vitality, endurance and growth. The method of claim 12, wherein the management evaluation A corporate management evaluation method comprising a credit rating, a problem in the current management status and an improvement task for solving the problem. delete delete

Images