KR100994457B1 - Method, system and computer-readable recording medium for providing custom-made education service - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method and system for providing a customized education service, and a computer readable recording medium for recording a computer program for executing the method. According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for providing a customized education service to a user, the method comprising: storing a plurality of user responses received for a plurality of test items for evaluating a user's learning achievement by unit, and the stored And generating an evaluation result of the unit's learning achievement based on a plurality of user responses, wherein the evaluation result is a result of evaluating the unit's unit learning achievement in consideration of the unit relationship. do.

Educational services, learning achievement test

Description

METHOOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING CUSTOM-MADE EDUCATION SERVICE}

The present invention relates to a method and system for providing a customized education service, and a computer readable recording medium for recording a computer program for executing the method. More specifically, the present invention provides a method, system, and computer program for executing the method for systematically diagnosing a user's learning achievement and / or psychological state, and providing an education service tailored to the user based on the result. A computer readable recording medium for recording the data.

It is not necessary to discuss the importance of education for students in all countries including Korea. Especially in Korea for several decades, the importance of various forms of education such as entrance examination and language education and the learning of students It has been increased.

When looking at the education mainly in Korea, currently, various kinds of education are usually conducted offline, and education through video lectures is being actively performed online. However, current education is almost uniform, in large part because it involves a large number of students. In other words, in the past, a large number of students were gathered and educated according to the curriculum, lecture time, and difficulty level, which were unilaterally determined by the educator.

In addition, in the past, even the curriculum needed to reflect individual characteristics such as individual student's learning ability and learning career, it was determined uniformly, so that the effect of learning was greatly reduced from the student's point of view, and the student's frustration As a result, social problems have arisen.

In other words, when teaching students with a uniform, uniform curriculum, how do you set the curriculum, because a defined curriculum seems boring to a good student, while a poor student cannot achieve academic achievement? It was one of the biggest problems for educators.

In order to solve this problem, in the past, each student has to spend more time and money, enrolling in a professional education academy, not a school, and learning lectures one-on-one or in small groups with the instructor. There was active training in the form of evaluation through recognized tests.

However, from a student's point of view, this method of learning is also a matter of choosing one of the many lessons unilaterally set by the educator, and the student is not able to receive what he or she really wants or truly needs. And the evaluation of students was also subjective and unstructured, so I could not say that they had a truly customized education. And, because of these problems, many students adopted a so-called 'tutoring teacher' to learn, but there were also a lot of problems due to the difference in competency of tutors and high tutoring fees.

In addition, it is difficult for a student to pinpoint where he or she is objectively vulnerable, even if it is in accordance with any of the above existing methods. There was also a wasteful problem. In addition, due to this problem, there was even a phenomenon in which the student gave up learning on the way.

Therefore, there is an urgent need for a method of accurately diagnosing the learning achievement and / or psychological state of individual students, and using the diagnosis results to make education suitable for individual students. Especially in the case of mathematics, this demand is even greater because systematic education is more important.

The present invention aims to solve all the problems of the prior art described above.

In addition, the present invention systematically diagnoses the psychological state of the user that may affect the learning achievement and / or learning of the user (for example, the student), and according to the result of the diagnosis to find a learning program and teacher for the user The recommendation is to provide the education service that is most suitable for the user.

Meanwhile, an object of the present invention is to enable a user to learn efficiently by allowing a user to be provided with a learning program suitable for his or her level.

In addition, an object of the present invention is to provide a user-customized education service through the evaluation of learning achievement continuously made in the user's learning process.

The configuration of the present invention for achieving the above object is as follows.

According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for providing a customized education service to a user, the method comprising: storing a plurality of user responses received for a plurality of test items for evaluating a user's learning achievement by unit, and the stored And generating an evaluation result of the unit's learning achievement based on a plurality of user responses, wherein the evaluation result is a result of evaluating the unit's unit learning achievement in consideration of the unit relationship. do.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for providing a customized education service to a user, the method comprising: storing a plurality of user responses received for a plurality of test questions for evaluating a user's mathematics learning achievement; Generating an evaluation result of the user's mathematics learning achievement based on a user response, wherein the plurality of test questions includes reading comprehension, comprehension, formulating ability, problem solving ability, computing ability and A method is provided that relates to at least two of the verification capabilities, and wherein the evaluation results include an evaluation of each of the stored plurality of user responses.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, a system for providing a customized education service to a user, the user response storage unit for storing a plurality of user responses received for a plurality of test items for evaluating the user's learning achievement by unit And an evaluation result generation unit configured to generate an evaluation result for the unit's learning achievement based on the stored plurality of user responses, wherein the evaluation result evaluates the unit's learning achievement for each unit in consideration of the unit relationship. One result is a system.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for providing a customized education service to a user, comprising: a user response storage unit for storing a plurality of user responses received for a plurality of test items for evaluating a user's mathematical learning achievement; An evaluation result generation unit configured to generate an evaluation result of the user's mathematics learning achievement based on the stored plurality of user responses, wherein the plurality of test items include reading comprehension, comprehension, formulating ability, A system is provided that relates to at least two of a problem solving ability, a computing ability, and a testing ability, wherein the evaluation result includes an evaluation of each of the stored plurality of user responses.

In addition, according to the present invention, there is further provided a computer readable recording medium for recording another method, system for providing a customized education service, and a computer program for executing the method.

According to the present invention, learning can be performed by a teacher and a learning program that is determined to be suitable for the user according to the learning achievement and / or psychological state of the user, thereby improving the learning efficiency and effectiveness of the user.

In addition, according to the present invention, since the user can be provided with a learning program suitable for his or her level, motivation for learning can be provided, and learning can be performed more efficiently.

In addition, according to the present invention, due to the learning achievement evaluation continuously made in the user's learning progress, the user can be immediately compensated for the wrong or lacking in the current learning progress.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The following detailed description of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. It should be understood that the various embodiments of the present invention are different but need not be mutually exclusive. For example, certain features, structures, and characteristics described herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention in connection with an embodiment. It is also to be understood that the position or arrangement of the individual components within each disclosed embodiment may be varied without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention, if properly described, is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Like reference numerals in the drawings refer to the same or similar functions throughout the several aspects.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art can easily implement the present invention.

Whole process

1 is a flowchart illustrating an overall process of providing a customized education service according to an embodiment of the present invention.

First, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, after a user connects to a server of a customized education service provider and enters personal information therein, the server of the educational service provider prepares to provide a service ( S110).

Personal information input can be made through a known member registration and login procedure. The personal information that is input may include the user's name, address, age, grade, school or institution, the achievement of his or her thoughts, and the grades of the recent test.

On the other hand, according to another embodiment of the present invention, the above online membership registration and login procedure is not necessarily required. For example, when a user makes a request for a service by making a simple phone call with a provider that provides the service, or goes directly to the service provider and makes an offline request, the service provider prepares to provide the service. You may. In such a case, the personal information of the user collected offline may be stored in a database that is available online later.

Then, when the service is ready, the user is provided with test questions for diagnosing the learning achievement of the user (S120). According to an embodiment of the present invention, when a user accesses a server through a communication network using a terminal and receives test items, the test items are provided to the user through a graphic user interface (GUI). When the user is provided with the test items offline according to another embodiment of the present invention, the test sheet including the test items may be provided to the user. Of course, the check items provided by the user may be provided through the user's own email account. Examples of test items will be described in detail later.

Next, when the user responds to the check items, the response is counted and scored (S130). In this case, the inspection items may be counted and scored by referring to a reference database that may be operated, managed or provided separately. The reference database may include a scoring reference table for each test item for deriving a score regarding the user's learning achievement according to the user's response.

In addition, the aggregation may include a process of storing a response result of the user, and updating the reference database based on the response result. For example, a reference table for ranking the user's learning achievement may be included in the reference database and updated according to the user's response result. Preferably, such counting and scoring may be performed automatically by a server operated by the service provider, or less preferably, the service provider may collect and manually perform a paper on which the user's response is written. have.

When the counting and scoring is finished, a report indicating a learning achievement test result is provided based on the counting and scoring (S140).

Next, a learning program suitable for a user is recommended based on the learning achievement test result (S150). The recommended learning program may be appropriately selected in consideration of the learning achievement of the user based on the learning achievement test result. On the other hand, learning programs that can compensate for the user's lacking aspects other than the user's learning achievements (for example, programs on learning methodologies that can correct learning methods, and customized review programs for the user's learning level) For example, a problem-solving capacity improvement program or a psychological counseling program may be selected as a recommendation program. Regarding which learning program is appropriate to recommend by referring to the learning achievement through the learning achievement test result, the learning achievement test result and the learning program may be separately stored in the learning program database where the learning program is matched and stored. Recommendations for learning programs corresponding to the achievement test results may be made automatically. In addition, a plurality of recommended learning programs may be provided. In this case, the user may select one learning program or a plurality of learning programs by referring to each learning program and a description thereof. When this process is performed offline, the user may be recommended a learning program based on the result of the learning achievement test through direct communication with the service provider.

Thereafter, a teacher who will help the user's learning is selected based on the learning achievement test result and the selected learning program, and a learning textbook is provided (S160). The selection of teachers and the provision of learning materials may be performed simultaneously with the recommendation of the learning program in step S150, or after the learning program is determined, may be made with reference to the learning program. In this case, the learning program database may include information about the teacher to be selected in association with the learning program. That is, a teacher most suitable for the user's learning may be selected based on the selected learning program, and a learning textbook suitable for the learning program may be provided. However, less preferably, teacher selection may be made separately from the learning program.

In either case, the selection of teachers can be made by selecting one teacher from among the recommended teachers provided by the service provider as well as the selection of the learning program. In selecting a teacher, personal characteristics such as a user's age or gender may be additionally referred to. The teacher selection process at this stage may also be performed online or offline.

When the learning program and the teacher is selected, the tuition fee is settled by the user (S170). Before finally paying the tuition fee, the result of the learning achievement test for the user, information about the selected learning program and the selected teacher may be provided to the user. In case tuition payment is made online, a known amount payment system and a security system may be used.

After the tuition payment is made, a description of a future study plan is provided to the user, and the class proceeds according to the plan (S180). The learning plan may be determined based on the learning achievement and / or psychological state of the user, etc. found as a result of the learning achievement test performed according to an embodiment of the present invention. On the other hand, the class progress can be made either in an online or offline manner. When the class progress is made online, the user may access the server of the service provider in accordance with the class plan, input personal information, and receive video lectures. The class progress may be performed offline. In this case, the teacher may visit the user in accordance with the lesson plan.

Meanwhile, while the class is in progress, periodic evaluation of the teaching result and feedback based on the evaluation may be simultaneously performed (S190). Evaluation of the teaching result may include evaluation of the teacher and / or evaluation of the user. For example, the evaluation of the teacher may include the subjective satisfaction of the user, and the evaluation of the user may include an evaluation of the learning achievement of the user. The evaluation of the learning achievement may be performed by performing a learning achievement test every predetermined learning progress or every predetermined period, and feedback may be made as necessary. The feedback herein refers to a process of re-evaluating the learning achievement of the user according to the learning achievement of the user, supplementing or changing the learning program, or changing the teacher according to the user's satisfaction with the teacher. On the other hand, such feedback may be made from time to time, if desired by the user, such feedback may be provided with information that may be helpful for learning strategies, such as entrance examination information.

Composition of Educational Service Provision System

The education service providing process according to the present invention as described above may be performed according to various embodiments in an online environment, an offline environment, or an environment in which the online environment and the offline environment are mixed.

As an example, assuming that the education service providing process according to an embodiment of the present invention is performed in an online environment, the overall configuration of the education service providing system may be as shown in FIG. 2. Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of a user-customized education service providing system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, the education service providing system of the present invention includes at least a user terminal 100 and a service providing server 300.

First, as shown, the user terminal 100 may be connected to the service providing server 300 through a communication network. In this case, the user may access the server 300 through various communication networks such as a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN) to input personal information. The communication network may preferably be a known world wide web.

Here, the user terminal 100 is a digital device including a function for allowing a user who wants to receive a service to access the service providing server 300 of the present invention via a communication network and then communicate with each other. For example, a desktop computer, a notebook computer, etc.), a workstation, a PDA, a web pad, a mobile phone, etc., the user terminal 100 according to the present invention may be any digital device having a computing capability by mounting a microprocessor and having a memory means. Can be adopted as.

In addition, the service providing server 300 may include an inspection item providing unit 310, an inspection result providing unit 330, and a recommendation unit 350. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the test item providing unit 310, the test result providing unit 330, and the recommendation unit 350 may be program modules in which at least some of them are in communication with the user terminal 100. These program modules may be included in the service providing server 300 in the form of an operating system, an application module, and other program modules, and may be physically stored on various known storage devices. In addition, these program modules may be stored in a remote storage device that can communicate with the service providing server 300. On the other hand, such program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, subroutines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or execute particular abstract data types, described below, in accordance with the present invention.

More specifically, the test item providing unit 310 is a test for diagnosing the learning achievement of the user when the user is ready to receive the service after accessing the service providing server 300 through the user terminal 100 The questions are provided to the user terminal 100.

On the other hand, the test result providing unit 330 calculates a score based on the user's response to the test items stored in the service providing server 300 or a separate database and outputs the result of the calculation. In this case, the reference database 400 containing the scoring criteria for each test item may be referred to.

The recommender 350 recommends a learning program and teacher suitable for the user's learning achievement based on the calculated score provided by the test result providing unit 330. In this case, a reference may be made to a learning program database containing information on each score type and a learning program corresponding to the score, and / or a teacher database containing information on teachers corresponding to each score type. These databases may be implemented by including at least some of them in the reference database 400, or may be implemented as a separate database.

On the other hand, the reference database 400 stores the scoring criteria for each question, for example, information about the correct answer for each question and the weight of the question. The reference database 400 may be provided as one component of the service providing server 300, but may be implemented as a separate component as shown in FIG.

Hereinafter, the aggregation and scoring according to the learning achievement test and the learning achievement test result will be described in detail.

Specific to the achievement test Example

Learning achievement test is divided into three test areas. The first is a test of learning knowledge, the second is a test of learning psychology, and the third is a test of learning personality types.

For example, when the learning achievement test is performed on a subject called 'mathematics', a test may be performed on mathematical knowledge related to mathematical learning ability, psychology during mathematics learning, and personality types according to mathematics learning. In particular, the applicant intends to refer to the test achievement test related to the 'math' subject to 'Test of Mathematical Problem Solving (TOMPS)'. In the following description, for the sake of convenience of explanation, a test for learning knowledge, learning psychology, and learning personality types will be described using the case of TOMPS as an example.

1. Examination of mathematical knowledge

A test of mathematical knowledge means a test of unit knowledge or methodological elements of mathematics learning, which are basically required for studying mathematics. Applicant refers to this mathematical knowledge in TOMPS, ie, the skills or knowledge that is basically required in studying mathematics, as 'Skill-Set'.

(1) Unit Learning Achievement Test

The test of learning achievement is preferably conducted on the unit to be studied in the future or the unit requiring prior learning.

These unit tests on learning achievement assess the user's performance on the units associated with each unit, and assign grades to each unit so that the user's weak units can be identified and the review plan for that unit can be easily provided. do.

Specifically, in the subject of mathematics, each unit is organized organically, and in order to learn new formulas and concepts, it is often necessary to familiarize yourself with the contents of previously learned units. To learn, familiarity with the formulas and concepts of the existing units involved must be preempted.

However, the learning achievement test for each unit may provide information about the weak unit and the excellent unit of the user, as well as information on the correlation between the unit requiring prior learning and the existing units. If proceeding, it is also possible to anticipate which units will show weaknesses or strengths in the future.

The following is an example showing the test result of the learning achievement provided by the test result providing unit 330 after the user responds to a question related to the unit-level learning achievement test provided by the test item providing unit 310. The test result providing unit 330 refers to the reference database 400 and assigns a score based on the user's response to the provided test item, and maps the evaluation result of the user's learning achievement for each of the related units. It is provided in the form of (map) and provided to the user.

<Example of learning achievement evaluation result>

That is, the user may grasp the associations between the units of the mathematics subject and the units through the test result for the learning achievement. For example, according to the table above, the contents of the intersections and the female sets learned in the 7-ga are related to the learning of the 10-gages and the propositions, and the inequality and the system of inequalities It can be seen that the learning content is linked to the learning contents of 10-ga and inequality.

On the other hand, the user can obtain information about the unit of low learning achievement and the unit of high learning achievement from the above map. For example, as indicated in the map above, the user may correctly grasp his learning achievement according to the color of each unit.

In addition, a learning program (preferably, a review program for the related unit) may be recommended based on the result of the comment and the learning achievement of each unit.

The following is an example of the learning achievement test result provided through the test result providing unit 330.

<Example of learning achievement test result>

On the other hand, the following table is an example of a review program provided through the recommendation unit 350 based on the test result. In the recommendation by the recommender 350, a learning program database in which information about a learning program to be recommended for each test result is stored may be referred to. As described above, the learning program database may store information for mapping the test results into various types or grades.

<Example of review program>

As such, in the case of a unit having insufficient learning achievement of a user, a specific customized review program may be presented before prior learning of a specific unit is performed. Therefore, the user can prepare the learning more completely by reviewing the part to be learned in the future.

(2) examination of problem solving ability

Inspection of the problem solving ability can be made based on the 'RUFSCA', a novel inspection tool developed by the applicant. 'RUFSCA' means reading a math problem, understand what the problem requires, formulate a requirement, find a solution to solve the equation, and calculate ), And Answer.

Specifically, the process of solving a mathematics problem can be divided into several steps, the first of which is to read the problem and to understand the situation of the problem. A process of understand what is perceived or ultimately desired. The third step is to formulate the condition and requirement of the problem expressed in natural language and express it in the language of mathematics. The fourth step is to derive the strategy to solve the problem expressed in the formula and then apply the strategy. Steps to simplify the problem with simpler formulas. Then, the fifth step is to perform simple calculations and calculations to find the unknowns of the problem converted into simple equations. Finally, to find out what the problem requires, the answer is obtained by using the unknowns. The sixth step is to check this. The term 'RUFSCA' means each step necessary for solving such a mathematical problem, and by dividing the process of solving a mathematical problem into the six steps as described above, the user's problem in the problem solving process systematically You can check it. Of course, all six steps are not always applied.

For example, a user may examine a user's reading and comprehension skills by reading the problem and identifying the intent, that is, the requirement, of the math problem. The formulating ability and the problem solving ability can be examined in the process of expressing the equation as a formula and the solution to the solution, and the computational ability and the probing ability can be examined in the process of calculating and solving the formula.

Through this step-by-step test, detailed judgment of the user's ability to solve a mathematical problem, problem comprehension, thinking ability, logic ability, application ability, and computing ability can be made.

In this regard, as mentioned above, a service provider may provide a test item for learning achievement test, for example, a subjective mathematics application problem online or offline, and the user may use the graphical user interface or the like. Answer the test questions.

The following is an example of an evaluation result for the sixth step (RUFSCA) of problem solving provided by the test result providing unit 330 after the user solves the math problem provided by the test item providing unit 310.

<Table of Evaluation Results for Problem Solving Ability>

According to the test method, in solving a mathematical problem, not only focusing on whether the answer is correct or incorrect, but also analyzing each root weakness in solving the problem, analyzing the root cause of the user's problem, The improvement can be found.

On the other hand, when scoring the learning achievement based on the user's response results can refer to the reference database 400 as described above. In the reference database 400, if a user incorrectly writes a formula in the formulating step of the scoring criteria for each item, for example, 'RUFSCA', the predetermined score is deducted. The scoring criterion of may be stored. In addition, information on the respective weights for the six steps of 'RUFSCA' may also be stored in the reference database 400. And, the sum score can be derived through this criterion. In addition, the process of calculating scores using the scoring criteria and the weights for each stage may be automatic.

The following is an example of a learning program for supplementing the weak part of the user provided by the recommendation unit 350 based on the test result. When the learning program is recommended by the recommender 350, a learning program database in which information about a learning program to be recommended for each test result is stored may be referred to. As described above, the learning program database may store information for mapping the test results into various types or grades. This learning program may include not only textbooks but also video lectures, online collections of official books, online problem solving, and downloadable e-books.

<Recommended Study Program Table>

In short, according to the present invention, it is possible to systematically identify a weak point when a user actually solves a problem by diagnosing a problem solving ability. It is possible to derive the method.

(3) Examination about learning strategy

The test about the learning strategy is to check the general mathematics learning method such as the user's study time or learning habits, and after identifying and diagnosing the user's mathematics learning strategy, the improvement and method for the wrong mathematics learning strategy are provided. This is to help you study math more effectively.

Tests on learning strategies can be divided into tests on usual study strategies, tests on study strategies versus tests, tests on concept learning strategies, and tests on problem solving strategies.

The test about the usual study strategy can be performed by the evaluation of the user's planability, sincerity, the evaluation of active learning, the evaluation of the time utilization, etc. Assessments, assessment of test preparation methods, assessment of the use of test time, and the like. In addition, the examination of the concept learning strategy may be performed by understanding the understanding of mathematics unit, and the examination of the problem solving strategy may be performed by evaluating the use of the answer sheet, the evaluation of the use of the solving notebook, and the like. However, these test methods are only examples, and the test of the learning strategy may be performed using other appropriate evaluation methods.

The service provider can identify and evaluate the user's usual study strategy and problem solving strategy by providing questionnaires necessary for the examination of the learning strategy.

When the user responds to the questionnaire provided by the test item providing unit 310, the test result providing unit 330 outputs an evaluation result regarding the learning strategy of the user. In this case, the reference database 400 containing information about the scoring criteria may also be referred to. The reference database 400 may store information about an optimal response for each test item and a weight for each test item. The service provider calculates the difference between the optimal response for each test item and the response input by the user or the examiner, and multiplies the difference by a weight to calculate the score and average score for each test item.

Through the examination of the learning strategy, it is possible to grasp the overall learning method of the user, and to find a way to supplement or improve the learning strategy based on this.

2. Examination about psychology in mathematics learning

The psychological test in mathematics learning is used to diagnose whether the user has the necessary mindset for mathematics learning. The test on mathematics affinity, the test for learning motivation, and the test for learning attitude are examined. It may include. The Applicant refers to this learning psychology, that is, the mindset necessary for studying mathematics in TOMPS, as 'Mind-Set'.

(1) Test about math affinity

The test on mathematics affinity is to measure the degree of anxiety and stress on mathematics subjects and to analyze the factors of mathematics avoidance, so that users can become more familiar with mathematics subjects.

The service provider provides the user with a questionnaire at the time of diagnosis to determine the test items for evaluating the affinity of mathematics, that is, the degree of anxiety about the mathematics subject, the degree of stress on the mathematics test, and the degree of evasion. Understand math affinity, etc.

In the examination of the psychological state, as in the case of the other examinations described above, the scoring is performed based on the user's response to the examination items, and again the information on the scoring criteria, that is, the optimum for each examination item Reference database 400 that contains information about the response and the weight of each test item may be referenced.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the degree and cause of the mathematical stress of the user can be grasped through the diagnosis about the stress index, and a method for reducing such stress can be derived. For example, a program or the like for turning negative thinking about math into positive thinking may be recommended to the user.

(2) Examination about learning motivation

The test about learning motivation is to diagnose basic motivational elements of learning such as efficacy, achievement motivation, and sense of purpose in studying mathematics, and aims to make students have a willingness to study mathematics voluntarily.

Service providers provide users with questionnaires to diagnose motivation for learning, as in the case of other tests described above, to identify the user's effectiveness in mathematics, motivation for learning, or attribution to mathematics achievement. And scoring can be performed. Similarly, the reference database 400 may be referenced when scoring.

On the other hand, through the examination of the learning motivation, it is possible to grasp the user's consciousness on the subject of mathematics, and to derive a method for improving the achievement motivation and purpose of the future learning.

(3) Examination about learning attitude

The test about the learning attitude is to measure the concentration, effort, persistence, interest, etc. in the study of mathematics and to analyze the cause of the lacking part so that the user can correct the attitude toward the study of mathematics.

To check the learning attitude, the service provider provides a questionnaire for evaluating the user's concentration on the mathematics, interest, sense of purpose, and desire to achieve, thereby grasping the user's learning attitude and scoring the result. can do. In this case, the reference database 400 may also be referred to when scoring.

On the other hand, through the examination of the learning attitude, it is possible to grasp the degree of concentration and achievement desire of the user's mathematics subjects, and to prepare a way to improve the concentration of future learning.

3. A test about personality type according to mathematics learning

‘Learning personality type’ refers to behavioral and personality patterns that users may see in the learning process. The test of the type of learning personality is to identify different learning inclinations or learning styles and to provide appropriate learning styles and teaching methods. In addition, it is possible to select a teacher suitable for the user's inclination according to the test result regarding the learning personality type and to provide a differentiated learning method.

The test item providing unit 310 of the service provider provides a questionnaire for determining the user's personality or learning tendency, and the test result providing unit 330 determines the user's disposition through the user's response to the questionnaire. After grasping, the results are presented to the user.

The recommender 350 recommends a learning method and style suitable for the user based on the learning propensity of the user derived by the test result providing unit 330. In addition, an appropriate teacher may be recommended according to the user's disposition.

In the above, for the convenience of explanation, a method of providing a user-tailored education service has been described using, as an example, a subject called 'math', but the present invention is not limited thereto. Of course, the service can be provided.

On the other hand, as described above, the process of providing education services according to various embodiments of the present invention can be performed in both an online environment or an offline environment as described above, and even if any one step is performed in the online environment, Other steps can be taken in an offline environment and vice versa.

On the other hand, when the service providing process is performed in an online environment, embodiments according thereto may be implemented in the form of program instructions that can be executed by various computer components and recorded in a computer-readable recording medium. The computer readable recording medium may include program instructions, data files, data structures, etc. alone or in combination. The program instructions recorded on the recording medium may be those specially designed and constructed for the present invention, or may be known and available to those skilled in the computer software arts. Examples of computer-readable recording media include magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks and magnetic tape, optical recording media such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, and magneto-optical media such as floptical disks. And hardware devices specifically configured to store and execute program instructions, such as ROM, RAM, flash memory, and the like. Examples of program instructions include machine code, such as that produced by a compiler, as well as high-level language code that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter. The hardware device may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the process according to the invention, and vice versa.

Although the present invention has been described by specific embodiments such as specific components and limited embodiments and drawings, it is provided to help a more general understanding of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. For those skilled in the art, various modifications and variations can be made from such descriptions.

Therefore, the spirit of the present invention should not be construed as being limited to the above-described embodiments, and all of the equivalents or equivalents of the claims, as well as the following claims, I will say.

1 is a flowchart illustrating an overall process of providing a customized education service according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of a user-customized education service providing system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

<Explanation of symbols for main parts of the drawings>

100: user terminal

300: service providing server

310: inspection item provider

330: inspection result provider

350: recommendation

400: reference database

Claims (23)

A computer-implemented method in a service providing server for providing a customized education service to a user, wherein the service providing server includes a database, a test result providing unit, and a recommendation unit. In the test result providing unit, based on the response of the plurality of users received in response to the test item for each of the plurality of units stored in the database, the test result for each of the plurality of units of the user Generating and providing an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result includes a result of evaluating a learning achievement regarding at least one preceding unit corresponding to each of the plurality of units of the user, wherein the evaluation result is for each preceding unit of the user -Is displayed in the form of a map that shows the relationship between the learning achievement and each of the plurality of units and the at least one preceding unit corresponding thereto; Recommending, by the recommendation unit, a learning program associated with a preceding unit having low learning achievement of the user to the user according to the evaluation result; How to include. The method of claim 1, The evaluation result is provided to a user terminal. delete delete The method of claim 1, The learning program includes at least one of a video lecture, an online collection of official books, an online problem solving, and a downloadable e-book. The method of claim 1, And providing, to the user terminal, information about a teacher associated with a preceding unit having low learning achievement of the user according to the evaluation result. delete delete delete delete delete A computer-readable recording medium for recording a computer program for executing the method according to any one of claims 1, 2, 5 and 6. As a system for providing customized training services to users, Database, Generating and providing an evaluation result for learning achievement for each of the plurality of units of the user based on a plurality of users' responses received for a questionnaire for each of the plurality of units stored in the database. A test result providing unit-The evaluation result includes a result of evaluating the learning achievement of at least one preceding unit corresponding to each of the plurality of units of the user, the evaluation result is the learning achievement degree of the preceding unit of the user And are displayed in the form of a map indicating an association between each of the plurality of units and the at least one preceding unit corresponding thereto. A recommendation unit for recommending a learning program associated with a preceding unit having low learning achievement to the user according to the evaluation result System comprising a. delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete delete

Images