KR100528182B1 - Internet-based discussion system and method thereof, record media recorded discussion method - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention induces healthy discussion proceedings by systematic and formalized discussion procedures and rules for solving various issues, conflicts, and decisions that occur in society, corporations, and groups, and is interactive through structural individualization. Through the debate workshop, we created a model that can extract all the information, knowledge, arguments, and plans of the group necessary for decision-making, and draw conclusions for rational decision-making tools based on the Internet that can be publicized and knowledged. It is about the discussion system method.

The present invention can be specified and managed by the nature and type of discussion selectively by the discussion rules that are pre-classified and registered the proceeding process of the discussion; It also defines the roles of panelists, panelists, stakeholders, audiences, etc .; Create and manage discussion information with a hierarchical structure of discussion classification information, subtopic information, claims, evidence, and objections; It has a special input device that can structurally register opinions by breaking down opinions by detailed issues; Interactively conducting workshops on various arguments and opinions by issue and structurally inquiring these workshop situations; Analyze all the arguments and arguments presented to define logical structure, correlation, and character among opinions; Based on this, we reject logically inappropriate and bad comments; Based on these personality definition and the results of the workshop, a ruling ruling was established to define the logical validity of the claim; Based on this, the ability to automatically verify the suitability of the claim on a case-by-case basis; Characterized in that configured to include.

Description

Internet-based discussion system and method, recording media recorded discussion method}

The present invention relates to an internet-based discussion system and method for supporting the best decision making to solve conflicts and problems presented in an organization through innovative interactive internet discussions.

All decision-making and policy-making in the conventional social or organization have been decided in a closed yard with a few decision makers and limited information, but the Internet is widely used to collect and express wide-ranging exchange of opinions and information, as well as understanding of specific classes. It is clear that the involvement of netizens, who have been marginalized in decision-making and policy making, as well as the intentions of various interest groups, have a great influence on public and public opinion gathering, policy-making, and decision-making.

Since 1990, our society has changed rapidly into various and complex advanced structures, but the existing public opinion system did not have the capacity and mechanism to accommodate it. Each sector of society is becoming more and more specialized, and various policy-making and legislation is decided by non-professional or certain minority, which has the problem of raising social opportunity loss by mass-producing various social problems.

In the existing media system using newspapers and TVs, the list of arguments is limited to space, time limitation, three-dimensional expression restriction and discontinuity of information, and it is difficult for readers to judge biased views and distorted claims. There was a problem that only the minority panel's opinion was drawn and highlighted due to the limitation of monitoring.

In addition, due to lack of professionalism and diversity due to lack of in-depth social experience of journalists, there is no comprehensive reconciliation and modeling through analysis of various claims, opinions, and information, and it does not transparentize the good and evil of each claim and information. In particular, they raised the specific problems of the issue but were limited in their ability to address them.

In order to solve the existing problems, a discussion forum by the Internet has emerged, in which a variety of citizens participate in the policy by publicly expressing various opinions and information from all walks of life.

The Internet discussion site is the only structure that can transcend time and space, and can gather diverse and diverse opinions. It can be discussed continuously for a long time so that conclusions can be drawn. By presenting rational and logical opinions, the efficiency of the discussion can be improved, and the impromptu or out of focus argument can be minimized. Since all opinion information presented in the debate is open and permanently preserved, the impact of policy on conclusions can be stronger than any other media. In addition, there is an advantage that policy makers may be effective feedback in the related policymaking in the future.

However, such a conventional Internet discussion site does not induce systematic discussions, but only opinions of middle heating people are confused, and sound opinions that should be read and introduced by many people are also pushed back after a certain period of time, making it difficult to search again. There is a general problem that constructive opinions are naturally dismissed by the participants, and the discussions are effectively changed into a fillet, a battle board, and a sound field because there are no regular rules or rules.

In addition, the long-term opinion is broken down by sub-category with many arguments and grounds in one opinion, and it cannot be debated. Of course, Audience also has structural problems that make it difficult to track the progress of the debate.

In addition, it does not result in a consensus by synthesizing the content of the discussion, or by the debate that Audience or decision makers can determine what is the problem and what needs to be solved.

In other words, instead of building a discussion site of a new paradigm that takes advantage of the Internet, all sites are constructed in a uniform and uniform format at the bulletin board level so that they can express conflicts not as a means to solve problems. Staying on the site is getting farther away from healthy and farmed netizens, and the overall problem is that it cannot be activated in the future.

The problems of the existing discussion described so far are summarized in FIG. 1.

1. Philosophy of the invention

       -The purpose of the discussion should not only lead to reasonable conclusions, but also be able to induce stakeholders to recognize the derivation process and the reasons for derivation so that the conclusions drawn can be successfully achieved.

-Anyone can think reasonably. Although sometimes there are moments of irrational thinking, people who have some degree of higher education and training in thinking skills generally think in their own way. And, the argument by rational thinking has the feeling and the ground that led to the claim. Misleading claims can be attributed either first, to the selfish subjectivity of the individual (subjective value), or second, to incorrect knowledge by misinformation.

 When human beings are not exposed, they are self-centered and this develops to form collective selfishness. However, when exposed, it has the power to give up collective selfishness. It is assumed that all arguments most likely contain this group selfish purpose.

In debating social consensus and conclusions, it is not necessarily determined by rational arguments. Sometimes, regardless of rationality, it is determined by public preference, or public opinion. This is called popular value. However, these public values are also often biased by poorly formed public opinion. In other words, in the modern society, the intelligibility of the public is very high, but the information necessary for decision making is blocked by the public media or some classes, which is acting as an obstacle to the formation of the right opinion.

-All claims have the property that the reasonableness of the claim can be made clear if the information or value that led to the claim is disclosed at a glance. Thus, the system plays a social role in providing and enlightening realistic and professional information about its value or justification for legitimacy in order to lead the public's proper structure of consciousness.

It is the philosophy of this system that discussions reflecting these attributes can lead to sound social consensus and conclusions of productive and developmental discussion.

Modern society is so diverse that it is impossible to make perfect decisions and there are pros and cons in any direction. Decision making is therefore only a choice for more important values. Therefore, opposition, which emphasizes only problems without countermeasures, can never be a factor influencing decision making and recognizes the problems as additional tasks to be solved.

The conclusion of the discussions pursued by this system is not absolute, but seeks the best direction, and the best direction is based on the conclusion process based on the collected information and values, and by disclosing certain decisions. It is not a conclusion but a conclusion that implies certain vitality and limitations.

2. Technical Challenge

The present invention has been devised to solve the problems of the existing Internet debate based on the above philosophy, the object of the present invention is to structure the opinions and claims of all walks of life by structure and register by detailed issues, objections, re- Interactive issue workshops such as objections can be developed to make it easier for Audience or decision makers to grasp the actual issues and discussions and to draw conclusions by detailed issues through logical adequacy of each opinion. To provide a discussion system and method based on the Internet that can draw and draw scientific and rational conclusions by cycle.

Therefore, the present invention is to implement the following technical problem to overcome the disadvantages of the existing Internet discussion.

1) What are the types of discussions, what are their characteristics, and how will the system accommodate various forms of discussions?

2) What rules of discussion should be defined for efficient and sound discussions, and how should the roles of the participants and moderators be defined?

3) How can I break down the comments by sub- issue and register and categorize them for a meaningful discussion workshop?

4) What are the characteristics of the opinions that hinder the sound discussion workshop, and how do you establish countermeasures?

5) What are the types of arguments and arguments, how should their characteristics and logic be classified, and how do they relate to each other?

6) How will the information structure and inquiry format be constructed so that Audience can clearly grasp the development of the debate workshops by detailed issues rather than by commenters?

7) How do you end the discussion workshop and how do you conclude the conclusion of the workshop?

In order to achieve the above object, the Internet-based discussion system according to the present invention is an Internet-based discussion system that supports decision-making through Internet discussions. Conduct interactive opinion workshops on specific issues of discussion subjects under certain rules, draw conclusions based on the ruling rules determined according to the nature of the opinions and the results of the workshops. A discussion management server that registers and manages workshop information and discussion result derivation information in a database; A plurality of panel client terminals incorporating a web browser such that the panel is connected to a discussion management server through the Internet; And presenting free opinions on the situation of discussion workshops handled according to the discussion workshops of the plurality of panels, inquiring about the opinions of the panels or participating in the discussion workshops by the panel's support requests, and participating in polls for public opinion gathering. A plurality of Audience client terminals; The configuration base including the configuration.

The discussion management server may include: a reference information DB for registering reference information (code table) for various classifications related to a discussion; A member information DB for registering basic information about all members; A discussion information DB for storing information about each discussion object, such as discussion classification and classification, discussion progress rules, and progress, which define the characteristics of the discussion, including information on the name and subtopic of the discussion; An Argument Information DB that registers Argument information such as all arguments, arguments, and queries generated during the discussion; And a discussion body information DB for registering discussion information (Audience, panel, moderator, stakeholders) for each discussion extracted from the member information DB. It comprises a; log information DB for storing the log-in performance by measuring the degree of participation participation for each member registered in the member information DB.

The member information DB includes stakeholder information for a specific organization or group; Includes personal membership information about individuals such as moderators, panels, and audiences.

The discussion information DB includes discussion basic information for classifying each discussion; Various discussion classification information of the discussion; Discussion rule information that sets the general rules of operation of the discussion; Discussion progress information to grasp the progress of the discussion; Includes discussion subtopic information categorized by discussion.

The Argument information includes a variety of opinion information including discussion dictionary information and all claims, objections, and queries generated during the discussion process; Additional information such as opinion classification information, various evaluation reports, and exit information; Include prior information and exit comments.

The discussion body information DB includes essential registration information of interested parties, panels, and moderators; Optionally, Audience information for viewing or limiting participation in the discussion is included, and the discussion body information DB is characterized in that an operator, a moderator or a stakeholder is extracted from the member information DB and registered when the discussion is confirmed.

In addition, the Internet-based discussion method according to the present invention, in the Internet-based discussion method to draw a conclusion by combining the discussions of the discussion parties connected via the Internet, the terminal according to the connection request of the discussion parties Automatically accessing the discussion management server and transmitting a menu screen for each discussion body to the terminal; Determining whether an operator is selected from an operator, a moderator, a stakeholder, a panel, and an audience on a menu screen for each discussion body sent to the terminal; Transmitting a discussion information registration screen to a terminal when an operator is selected in the menu screen for each discussion body; Registering basic information, such as a discussion period and a discussion name, on the discussion information registration screen sent to the terminal to register in the discussion information DB; Transmitting the discussion body information registration screen to a terminal when the discussion basic information is registered; And designating a moderator on the discussion body information registration screen sent to the terminal and registering the discussion body information in the discussion body information DB. It includes.

Transmitting a moderator menu screen of a discussion body registration, discussion operation information registration, discussion topic registration, dictionary information registration, opinion screen, support request review, and moderator verdict when a moderator is selected on the menu screen for each discussion body; Transmitting the discussion information registration screen to the terminal when the discussion operation information registration is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Registering the discussion information and discussion operation information of the discussion field on the discussion information registration screen sent to the terminal and registering it in the discussion information DB; And determining whether the discussion section registered in the discussion information database is the main discussion, and if the discussion is the main discussion, input the discussion classification information and the discussion rule information to register in the discussion information database. It includes.

Transmitting a discussion body information registration screen to a terminal when a stakeholder is selected on the menu screen for each discussion body; Registering a delegation panel in the discussion body information DB sent from the discussion body information registration screen sent to the terminal; Transmitting the request text creation screen to the terminal when the delegation panel is registered; And creating a request text in the request text creation screen sent to the terminal and registering the request text in an Argument information DB. It includes.

Transmitting a panel menu screen for claim registration, objection registration, support request, and reply acceptance to the terminal when the panel is selected on the menu screen for each discussion body; Determining whether an editor is installed when claim registration is selected on a panel menu screen sent to the terminal; Automatically downloading the Editor if the Editor is not installed, and executing the Editor to send the Editor screen to the terminal if the Editor is installed; And inputting a comment in the Editor screen sent to the terminal to register in the Argument Information DB, and automatically notifying the discussion party and related Audience that the new comment has been registered in the Argument Information DB through e-mail. It includes.

If the audience is selected on the menu screen for each discussion body, transmitting the audience menu screen of the objection (question), the free opinion presentation, and the support request reply to the terminal; Transmitting a discussion studio situation screen to the terminal when the support request reply is selected on the Audience menu screen sent to the terminal; Registering an arbitrary panel by selecting an Argument to be returned from the discussion studio situation screen sent to the terminal; If the arbitrary panel is registered, sending a reply input screen to the terminal to process the input in a private manner and then registering it in an Argument information DB; And notifying the input processing result registered in the Argument Information DB to an e-mail and processing the opinion screen. It includes.

In addition, the discussion method based on the Internet of the present invention, the processing of the results of the discussion forum of the discussion parties, the discussion to handle the whole verdict of the discussion, such as fit, conditional, non-conformance, reservation, etc. for Subject Opinion (SO) Further comprising a result inducing step; The debating result deriving step includes: a debating studio processing step of predominantly processing a studio result for an abandoned SO; A SA evaluation result of system verdict processing such as conformity, conditional conformity, nonconformity, reservation, etc. for the SO processed in the result of the debate workshop; A discussion Closing process that closes the discussion at the end of the discussion period and notifies the end of discussion message by e-mail; A conflict assessment result that processes the outcome of the conflict against SO; And claim verdict result of checking the SA verdict by claim and processing the system verdict; It includes.

In addition, the Internet-based debate method according to the present invention is an internet-based debate method in which a debate of a stakeholder connected through the Internet is drawn to draw a conclusion, including a topic of discussion, a moderator, a stakeholder and A debate decision process for determining Audience; A discussion process for deciding basics of discussion to determine discussion periods, discussion rules, and panels for stakeholders; A discussion party registration process in which an operator of the discussion management server first registers a moderator to conduct a discussion, and registers the remaining discussion parties in which the registered moderator directly participates in the discussion; A discussion operation information registration process for registering discussion basics, discussion personality classification and prior information; A discussion preparation step including a subtopic registration process of registering a subtopic of a discussion and determining and registering opinion commentators for each subtopic; Discussion on the on-going discussion list on the site and announcement of announcements; Subject Argument (SA) Registration, New Opinion Registration Guide Subject Argument registration process for automatically notifying e-mail to the discussion parties; Subject Argument (SA) Personality classification registration and rejection of comments Opinion e-mail notification Screen process; A debate workshop step including a counter-registration process for SA and a counter-registration process for automatically notifying the counterparties of the counter-registration notice; A debating studio result processing process for processing the studio result of the abandoned SA; A debate verdict step including a SA verdict that verifies the system, including suitability, conditional conformity, nonconformity, and reservation for the processed SA; And a discussion Closing process that notifies the end of the discussion period and e-mails the announcement of the end of the discussion; An on-going studio opposition treatment and a studio termination treatment process for opposing studio SA verdicts; A discussion closing phase including a claim system verdict, a subtopic verdict, and a debate verdict process that processes the entire verdict verdict; It includes.

In addition, the Internet-based discussion method according to the present invention is an Internet-based discussion method that draws conclusions by combining the discussions of discussion parties connected through the Internet. A debate debate stage in which a specific minority group may conduct discussions separately from the main discussion and reflect the results in the main discussion; Counter-discussion stages in which discussions are attempted by changing positions on specific issues; As a sub-discussion subordinate to the main discussion.

Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

2 is an overall configuration diagram of the discussion system based on the Internet of the present invention, the present invention is a panel (including members, etc.) connected via the Internet according to the specific issues of the topic of discussion under a predetermined rule for each discussion type It conducts interactive opinion workshops, draws conclusions based on the ruling rules determined according to the nature of the opinions and the results of the workshops, and publishes information on all the stakeholders, including discussion information, discussion studio information, and debate results. Discussion management server 100 to register and manage; A plurality of panel client terminals 200 (a terminal which the panel is operated and connected to the discussion management server) with a web browser for allowing the panel to access the discussion management server 100 through the Internet; Present free opinions on the situation of discussion workshops handled according to the discussion workshops of the plurality of panels, inquire about the opinions of the panelists, participate in the discussion workshops by the panel's support requests, and participate in polls for public opinion. It comprises a plurality of Audience client terminal 300 (terminals that are connected to the discussion management server by the operation of Audience). The term "support request" used in the present invention refers to an act of requesting help from all audiences due to a lack of expertise or information by a particular panel or interested parties, and difficulty in recounting a specific objection.

The discussion management server 100 is composed of a web server 400 and an information table 500 (database), and the web server 400 downloads the main homepage screen of the discussion system when each client terminal 200 or 300 is connected. According to the menu selection of the homepage from each client terminal (200,300), the screen of the corresponding menu is inquired and downloaded from the information table 500, and the user's input is recorded in the information table 500, and the information table 500 ) Stores and updates the data for providing the corresponding information screen and the data input by the user according to the user's individual menu selection on the main homepage screen.

The connection between the discussion management server 100 and the multiple panel and Audience client terminals 200 and 300 is a wired Internet access method using a modem, a PSTN, a dedicated line or an ISDN, and a wireless Internet through a cellular, PCS, microwave or satellite communication network. It can accept all types of connections. Each client terminal 200, 300 may be any as long as it can be connected to the terminal network including the Internet using any of the above-described methods.

Preferably, each of the client terminals (200, 300) is, for example, Internet Web that supports Internet access to a general personal computer having a Pentium class microprocessor, a hard disk driver, a communication modem, a multimedia receiver, etc. If you have a browser, you can use any PC or terminal.

Moreover, if the terminal has Internet access, it can be used as a workstation, general portable communication terminals (PCS, PHS), portable information terminals (PDA), set-top boxes, digital televisions, and web phones. ) Can also be used.

The information table 500 may be configured with, for example, a known relational database management system (RD BMS) such as an Oracle, a Structured Query Language (SQL) server, and Informix.

3 is a schematic configuration diagram of an information table applied to the present invention, and includes a reference information DB 510 for managing reference information (code table) in which various classification information used in the system is listed; A member information DB 520 that manages information on all members registered in the system (divided into all personal member information such as audition, panel, moderator, and stakeholder information); A discussion information DB 530 that stores information about each discussion object such as classification, rules, and progress, as well as basic information such as the name and subtopic of the discussion; An Argument Information DB 540 for generating Argument information such as all claims, arguments, and queries generated during the discussion; A discussion body information DB 550 for storing discussion information of each participant who is extracted from the member information DB 520 (a moderator, a panel, a designated audience, and a stakeholder designated) participating in the discussion; Logging information DB (560) for storing the system login (log-in) performance of each member (refer to Audience Poll selection by measuring the participation degree by individual members) is configured. The term discussion body (discussion body) used in the present invention collectively refers to the moderators, panelists, stakeholders, audiences, etc. participating in the discussion. For example, each claim, suggestion, and opinion that is first presented by each soju in the debate is called a claim, and a plurality of subordinate opinions on which each claim is based are called claim arguments. In addition, the argument basis is the object of the argument and the argument is the representative word of the argument basis, and it is not the subject of discussion. In terms of the term used in the present invention, the subject argument (SA) and the object argument (OA) are used. The basis of each claim, such as facts, values, and proposals, is called a claim basis. Therefore, according to the description of the embodiment may be used as Opinion instead of the term Argument. That is, Subject Argument or Object Argument may be used as Subject Opinion or Object Opinion, respectively. In addition, the panels presenting SA and OA are referred to as Subject Panel and Object Panel, respectively. Also, in terms of issues (or sub-issues), which are terms used in the present invention, specific OAs for specific SAs are used. Is presented, it is said that a thread has occurred. Thus, if n OAs occur for a particular SA, n issues arise for that particular SA.

The reference information DB 510 refers to a classification that is uniquely defined in advance for common use regardless of individual discussions in the corresponding site where the discussion system is installed and operated. It is configured so that administrator) can input arbitrarily and the following classification information exists.

▲ Classification of Discussion Fields: Society, Politics, Economy, Culture, Health, Environment, Education, etc.

▲ Discussion Types: Pros / Solutions, One-to-One / Multilateral, Local / Public, Public / Secret, Policy / General, Freedom / Panel (Panel)

▲ Discussion: Main discussion, pre-discussion, derived debate, dissent debate, re-debate The dissent debate, which is a term used in the present invention, suggests alternatives, solutions, and policies, as opposed to policy debate. It means a discussion that is conducted separately by changing positions in the discussion. In addition, the term "derived debate" used in the present invention means a predetermined time in the debate rule as a time limit for registering counter arguments, and when the time limit for replies passes, the debate workshop on the issue is terminated.

▲ Member Information: Individuals (Active Participants, General Members) / Interested Parties

▲ Membership Participation: Opinion, Voting / Jury, Access / Inquiry

▲ Debate Participants: Moderator, Stakeholders, Panel (Delegation, Discretion), Audience

▲ Discussion subtopic: meaning (definition) of a matter, problem or solution, cause or factor, urgency of the matter

▲ Opinion classification: Subject Argument (SA), Object Argument (OA), Counter Argument (CA, Object / Subject) The arguments are called counter arguments, and the arguments presented by the Subject Panel and Object Panel are called Subject Counter Argument and Object Counter Argument, respectively.

▲ Classification of Claims

 Basis structure: standalone, dependent

 Classification of evidence: facts (information), values (coordination), and proposition

▲ Classification of claims (subtopics) in policy discussion: claim method, suggesting necessity, anticipated problems and measures, cases, etc.

▲ Classification of objection

 Opposition: active opposition, passive opposition

 Conditional presentation: aggressive conditional presentation, defensive conditional presentation

 Query: Question, Question

 Social Priority

▲ Types of opinions: new, changed, withdrawn, alternative, supplementary

▲ Withdrawal of opinions: Bad, duplicate, nonsense, parallel opinions

▲ Verdict Classification

 Workshop Result: SA Advantage, SA Poor, Opposition

 Verdict: Relevant, inadequate, reserve verdict

▲ Discussion status: discussion, withdrawal, stop discussion, finish discussion, finish discussion As discussion-with-proposition and discussion-without-proposition in the above classification information, the policy discussion is conducted before the discussion begins. Discussing a plan, proposal, policy, etc. by a specific stakeholder, and conducting discussion based on this, and general discussion refers to conducting a discussion in the absence of such a plan or policy.

[Kind of discussion]

end. Pros and cons, solution debate: sorting according to the nature of the debate issue

    -Discuss how the discussion is divided into pros and cons or debates that seek to solve various problems or seek various opinions. Proceed partially differently.

    In the case of pros and cons, controversy arises over specific issues regardless of the stakeholder.

    The solution discussion raises a number of issues. It is usually a multilateral debate, and each stakeholder has their own arguments, and if the arguments have different targets, the interests are diversified. Unlike the pros and cons, it is a discussion that identifies "what is a problem" and discusses "what is the solution". Thus, solution discussions will often be broken down into topics that lead to local discussions.

    Pros and cons must be subject to attack in all opinions, and solution debates may or may not be targeted.

I. One-to-one debate, multilateral debate

    One-to-one discussion is one-to-one discussion of conflicting stakeholders. Pros and cons are considered as one-to-one discussions when multiple stakeholders are clearly divided against the pros.

    -Multilateral discussion refers to the case where there are plural opposing stakeholders. In this case, the claim of a particular stakeholder or panel may be designated as one or more than one attack target.

All. Public debate, local debate: sort by scope

    -The discussions are divided into public discussions where the unspecified majority is interested and local discussions that discuss the interests of specific groups.

    -Local discussion refers to the moderator, audience, panel, and stakeholder belonging to a specific group, such as a business or organization. Particular stakeholders in public discussions may develop local discussions for internal use by stakeholders to gather internal input. In this case, the system will only open the discussion to stakeholders designated by the stakeholders.

la. Discuss, Discussing Discussions

    -Discuss the discussions that are open to all discussions and secret discussions that are open only to specific discussion bodies. Secret discussions may be conducted on some issues in the forum.

hemp. Free Discussion, Panel Discussion: Distinguishing Panels on Participation

    -Discussions involving a specific stakeholder or a specific panel that gathers and gathers various opinions are called free discussions, and discussions focusing on a specifically delegated panel are called panel discussions.

    -Free discussions can be applied when the topic of discussion is extensive, where there is no solution to the knowledge and opinion of a specific minority, or when the coordination of multiple opinions is coordinated.

    -Netizens' discussion on a typical existing web site is a free discussion. In other words, in the panel discussion and free discussion, which are terms used in the present invention, the discussion about the panel pre-delegated by the stakeholders is called the panel debate. Discussions that are open to participation are called free discussions.

<Example of Free Discussion>

   Topic: "What awareness do young people from both countries need to improve on their partner countries for future good relations between Korea and Japan?"

   Participants: All university students from both countries can participate

    -Free discussions do not pre-specify the panel, and during the debate, members can register for the panel at any time and have the authority of the delegated panel. It also does not specify interested parties. In other words, in the delegation panel and the arbitrary panel, which are terms used in the present invention, a person (or a stakeholder) who presents an opinion such as a specific argument or objection in the discussion is called a panel, and the panel discussion advances by the interested parties. The panel assigned to the panel is called a delegation panel, and a panel selected temporarily for a specific issue during a panel discussion or general discussion is called a temporary panel.

    -Since free discussion does not designate stakeholders, there is no direct and active response to the results or progress of the discussion. This is not always the best way to conclude a debate because the results of the debate do not always ensure the best conclusions and the particular interests whose interests depend on the debate do not emerge. Debate rules are also decided by the moderator.

    -The proceedings of the free discussion are treated the same as the panel discussion except for the conclusion. Therefore, from now on, all explanations and definitions of the system will revolve around panel discussions unless otherwise stated.

bar. Policy debate, General debate: Classification according to the debate

    -Discuss the policy, business plan, or plan (hereinafter referred to as the proposal) established by a specific stakeholder at the beginning of the discussion and develop a discussion based on the policy discussion. The form of presenting opinions and arguing against them is called general discussion.

    Pros and cons are often desirable in the form of policy debates, but solution debates may be policy debates or general debates.

    -If the subject of the discussion is specific, it is also considered a policy discussion.

    -In the case of general discussions, the moderator should provide the dictionary information of the discussion prior to the start of the discussion and categorize the subtopics for detailed discussion. On the other hand, in the case of policy discussions, the proposal itself is organized by issue and discussion dictionary information can be assumed. Therefore, discussion dictionary information or subtopic classification can be omitted. Prior information, which is a term used in the present invention, is all information or facts provided before the discussion in order to increase the efficiency of the discussion of the panels and to give Audience an understanding of the issues (focuses) of the discussion, definition of terms, objective facts and information, problems, and urgency. This may be provided by the moderator or inputted by a specific stakeholder, and may be provided through prior discussion if necessary.

four. Dictionary discussion

    -If the moderator cannot provide clear prior information, problem-recognition discussions may be conducted for the effectiveness of this discussion. In addition, in case of discussions such as solution discussions where the scope of the discussion is very broad or expertise is required, and the presenter cannot provide advance information alone, a preliminary discussion may be conducted to agree on the perception of the problem.

 Subtopic of discussion

    -The preliminary discussion only discusses the three prior information items of problem, cause, and urgency of solution. The urgency and cause of solution may be conducted in this discussion.

 Advance Discussion and Procedure

    -Prior discussions are subordinate to the main discussion, but as an independent discussion, all the processing is carried out in the same manner as this discussion, and the preliminary information is confirmed.

    -The deadline for discussion, topic setting, participation panel decision, etc. shall be decided by agreement between the moderator and the debate.

 Succession of main discussion in advance discussion

    -Prior discussions do not re-debate or debate discussions, and even if the conclusion cannot be reached through prior discussions, the opinions registered up to that time are inherited from the main discussions and continue in the main discussions.

Cases where prior discussion was needed : In case of discussion on media reform conducted by the mother broadcasting (2 hours)

  . Long-term discussions between NGOs and opponents of the reform proposals were conducted by conducting discussions without any prior agreement of the two sides on the specific necessity of the press reform (the urgency of the impact on our society). However, the core issues of the reform methodology have not been properly approached and have become useless discussion.

  . In other words, the NGOs are insisting on reforms to create a national promotion committee for the National Assembly, NGOs, journalists, readers, etc. from the viewpoint that press reform is the most urgent issue. Only confirmed.

  . This meant that the need for media reform was mutually recognized, but there was a difference in the perception of how much the necessity was. Without first identifying this difference in perception, the arguments of the two sides were drawn only in parallel.

Ah. Disagreement

    In the course of discussion, if one side only criticizes without alternatives, the other side of the stakeholder is logically at risk. At this time, by exchanging positions with each other and arguing with each other, the other party proposes an alternative and vice versa to prove the validity of the original draft.

    Ex) Controversy over the necessity of corporal punishment of teachers.

    Everyone agrees that corporal punishment should be eliminated as much as possible. Corporal punishment has long been used by mankind both east and west as a punishment for wrongdoing. Punishment for wrongs has been recognized as a necessary evil to control a large number of groups through preventing the recurrence of wrongs between yourself and others. However, it is possible that the teacher's concern is that there is no practical means to punish students effectively without punishment. For this reason, if the physical punishment is prevented, the teacher tends to give up being an educator and bystanders as an education forwarder, which causes side effects that lead to more educational problems.

    -At this time, rather than debating such debate in terms of "needs to punish and unfairness of corporal punishment", there is a debate on "Is there no means of punishment when there is no corporal punishment?" Suggests alternative corporal punishment from the teacher's point of view, and the teacher refutes the alternative as a way of avoiding the alternative from the student's point of view.

    -By disagreeing with corporal punishment, the conscientious objector is encouraged to make a consensus by shifting the focus to debate about the method of punishment or the point of need rather than denying it.

 The operation of a counter-discussion

    Opposition discussions are conducted only on specific asserted arguments (SAs), not necessarily on the whole discussion.

    -Proposals of dissent discussions can only be made by the panel (or stakeholder) who registered the claim and can be executed if the moderator accepts it.

    -The moderator enters the history and intent of the disagreement, and the system automatically notifies all relevant discussion bodies by e-mail. The history and intent of the dissent discussion should be preserved as the progress of the discussion associated with the dissent discussion.

    -Once a dissent discussion is decided, the moderator shall create a new subtopic or a new Subject Argument for the SA, and also specify the Subject panel in reverse. Also, the system distinguishes the presentation of the opposite discussion from the original Argument presentation.

    -If the objection is presented in a changed position as a result of the objection argument, and the objection is not raised until the time limit for the objection is over, the original subject argument is terminated by the moderator.

     (In the above example, the necessity of corporal punishment is terminated if the corporal punishment proposed by the corporal punishment opposition is not an effective means of education control.) The term used in the present invention is the counter argument. ) Is the deadline for registration and is pre-determined in the discussion rules. In addition, after the deadline for protest, the debate on the issue will be terminated.

    The debate is a key to the utility of this system, as it is an effective measure to eliminate pre-modern and unproductive political behavior that creates a logical barrier to sustainably substantiate decision-making choices by continuing logical opposition without alternatives. Will be an element.

character. Discussion

    Re-discussion refers to re-discussing a deferred discussion.

    An erection of a re-discussion is erected by the agreement of all stakeholders.

    Panel Changes: Panels can be changed and registered when re-discussing.

    -Once the re-discussion begins, the system will continue the discussion by inheriting all the comments handled in the main debate.

    -Re-discussion can also inherit various discussion rules, subtopics, etc., but subtopics can be added by the moderator as necessary.

car. Secret discussion

    -All discussions that are mentioned in the discussion can be secretly discussed, especially if they are to be made public only to specific stakeholders.

    -The conduct of confidential discussions is at the request of stakeholders and at the discretion of the moderator.

    -The system should use special encryption techniques (Encoding, Decoding) to store all discussion information to prevent unauthorized disclosure of the discussion, and also have access control to site accessors using passwords.

    -Audience designation of secret discussion must be registered member and is registered directly by the moderator through secret approval process by off-line processing separate from the system.

    -Secret debate is the nature of local debate, and when it is conducted for a specific subject argument, it is a debate.

wave. Discussion

    -It is a specialized and technical issue on a specific issue that occurred during a discussion, and the discussion body such as a panel or a stakeholder is changed to have a separate discussion.

    -The conclusions obtained through the debate are automatically registered as preliminary information in this discussion.

Example of Debate Discussion

    -In the manufacturing industry, the production, sales, and buyers' materials will be referred to new stakeholders as the "collaboration with suppliers" to deliver materials or raw materials when discussing "good inventory and delivery". Separate discussions were made with a panel and a panel.

 Derivative Discussion

    -The debate will be decided by panel or stakeholder's recommendation and moderator's judgment.

    -Panels, stakeholders are treated as new discussions that change.

    -Derived discussions are regarded as independent discussions. In this discussion, information on connection with derived discussions is maintained. Screen presentations are treated as subtopics of main discussions.

    When a debate begins, the debate "holds" all debate on the issues (claims, arguments, arguments, etc.) that led to the debate until the debate is concluded.

4 is a detailed structural diagram of an information table applied to the present invention.

The member information DB 520 provides a function of automatically generating a database by directly loading an external file (personnel file within a company) in the case of a local discussion in which a database for a member of the organization is built. In the case that the member is to be generated by direct on-line registration, the member information DB 520 and the stakeholder information 522 that is information about a specific organization or organization; It consists of personal member information 521, which is information about individuals such as moderators, panels, and audiences. Since these information are composed of different information, they are physically separated and dualized.

The personal member information 521 includes ID, password, social security number, occupation (occupation), affiliation, position, name, contact information (e-mail, phone number), basic personal information for recording the final education level, registration date, personal career ( It consists of personal career information that registers up to 10 major careers). Individual members are classified information that can measure the member's ability to participate in the discussion by log information, including Audience (members who have not performed pure Audience, panel or jury / voting), and actively participating members (active). It is divided into members who vote / jury or perform arbitrary panel performance, and general participants (members who do not vote / jury or perform arbitrary panel performance less than active members).

The significant level of the active participation member is defined in the initial site information for each application site, and the individual participation in the discussion is extracted from the log information DB 560 for the discussion information.

The stakeholder information 522 stores Id, stakeholder name, stakeholder classification, support request count, and <contact person information-n>, and the <contact person information-n> includes member id-n, contact person name-n, and position. -n, task-n, contact-n are logged. A stakeholder is an organizational classification of a department or a division when used internally by a specific company or an organization, and a comprehensive classification of an organization or an organization by a portal site targeting an unspecified number. Therefore, the system is designed to randomly use stakeholder classification.

The discussion information DB 530 includes discussion basic information 531 for classifying each discussion, various discussion classification information 532 of the corresponding discussion, discussion rule information 534 for setting general rules of discussion, and progress of discussion. The discussion progress information (535) and the discussion topic topic information (533) can be identified. The discussion rule information used in the present invention is information inputted by an interested party and a moderator to agree on a rule of discussion prior to conducting a discussion, and the discussion rule is based on a predefined item in the system.

-The classification of discussion information is formed and managed in three levels as shown in FIG. 38, and is divided and directly performed by the site administrator and the discussion moderator. To this end, the system provides a tree-type classification function such as Windows Explorer.

Step 1: issue category; Classification of society, politics, education and health

Step Two: Discussion Topics; Discussion list

Step 3: discussion subtopics; Classification of several key issue claims per discussion

    -The first stage classification input is performed by the site administrator when the site is opened.

The discussion basic information 531 stores basic information of a discussion such as a discussion ID, a discussion name, a discussion section, and a discussion period related to all the discussions, and includes main discussions, preliminary information discussions, derivative discussions, debate discussions, re-discussions, and the like. Debate division information is stored. Derived discussions, counter-discussions, re-discussions, and pre-information discussions, which are not main discussions, are accompanied by the basic information (discussion id) of the main discussions. The discussion period consists of two periods: the debate period set at the beginning of the debate and the actual debate period extended by the time limit for protest.

The discussion classification information 532 stores sort information such as pros and cons, discussions on local / public discussions, and public / secret discussions, and classification information on discussion fields such as social, political, economic, and health.

In the discussion rule information 534, a claim submission time, a reply / response request, an additional claim deadline, and a prior information protest time limit are defined as days, and whether or not to adopt an argument is free. Acceptance, Controversial Opinion Defines whether or not to vote for Audience, sanctions for the dismissal opinion, and verdicts for yes or no, and changes the opinion to the number of allowable changes for each argument + the number of allowable changes. Define the allowable frequency.

In the discussion progress information 535, information for identifying the progress of the discussion such as the number of registered opinions (number of SAs), the number of disputed SAs, the number of verdicts SA, the number of verdict SAs, the number of dismissal opinions, and the discussion status is recorded. . This information is available to Audience in a discussion menu called Discussion Status Information. The SA (Subject Argument), which has been opposed but has not been re-disputed against it, is called SA, and the progress of discussion, cancellation of discussion, suspension of discussion, closing of discussion, and termination of discussion are called discussion situations.

In the discussion subtopic information 533, subtopic ID, discussion ID, subtopic, subtopic classification, Subject Party, Subject Party specified date information are recorded, and the subtopic classification is classified according to the discussion topic or classified as follows.

Problems and Solutions: Problems may be replaced by needs or effects, depending on the discussion.

▲ Cause and factor: Cause of problem, factor

▲ Meaning and definition of various issues: Contents defining the meaning and definition of the core contents of the issue

▲ Urgentness of Issues: While there is a general tendency to overlook many existing discussions, it is important to consider two factors of importance and timeliness as key issues that determine the success or failure of a discussion. Timelines may be expressed in specific conditions or conditions, or in a certain period of time.

Participants in the discussion will be specific stakeholders (organizations) or individuals. They can be panels or audiences, depending on the discussion, so all discussion bodies except Audience are pre-defined subordinate to the discussion. All discussion bodies such as stakeholders, panelists, and audiences are pre-registered in the member information irrespective of the specific discussion and form basic information to enable registration by discussion.

The Argument Information DB 540 stores Argument information such as all arguments, arguments, and queries generated in the discussion process. Argument information includes all kinds of argument dictionary information and all claims, arguments, and queries generated in the discussion process. It includes the Arguments (541,542) and additional data such as various evaluation reports and exit information, and creates and manages logically by discussion topic and stakeholder, except for advance information (543) and exit comments (544).

 -Argument information is generated by discussion topics, and opinion information is divided into two types of information, the first SA information of subject stakeholders and other CA information.The first opinion information of SA stakeholders includes not only verdict data but also free opinion information of Audience. Poll information may be added, and all comments may have additional explanation information.

 -Preliminary information and exit opinion should not be generated for each stakeholder.

 There may be multiple SA entities in one subtopic, and multiple SAs in one SA entity. However, for one SA there is only one CA stakeholder.

The Argument information is generated differently according to opinion type as follows.

1. Claim information: claim ID, claimant, date, target of attack, objection, verdict status, verdict date, discussion id, subtopic id, claim

* Claimant refers to stakeholder + panel.

* Whether or not to argue is whether or not any of the SAs have been disputed.

* The target of attack is the target of the attack, ie the stakeholder who must argue against the claim.

2. Claim evidence information: claim ID, claim evidence ID, claimant, date, target of attack, evidence requirement, structure of evidence, classification of evidence, whether objection,

Object Arg-id, Argument Content, Studio Result, Decision Report, Verification Date

* Studio Result: Dominant, Inferior, Confrontation

* Decision report: Adequate, Conditional, Unsuitable, Verification

3. Argument and Counter Argument: Arg-id, objector, date, classification, objection objection, whether to objection, objection objection SA Arg-id, CA contents, objection time limit

* Classification: SA, OA classification (discrimination against SA or against OA)

4. Query: Arg-id, Queryer, Date, Classification, Query Category, Answer, Query Target Arg-id, Query Details

* Classification: SA, CA classification (division of query about SA or CA)

* Inquiry Category: Question, Question

5. Answer: Arg-id, Answerer, Answer Date, Classification, Answer Classification, Blank, Corresponding Query Arg-id, Answer

* Classification: SA, CA classification (Category to SA or CA)

6. Support Request: Arg-id, Classification, Support Request Category, Support Request, Support Request Due Date (Expiration Date)

7. Description: Arg-id, corresponding Arg-id, the word connection information, description of the description

8. Dictionary information: Arg-id, subtopic ID, registration category, configuration item classification, registration date, prior information

9. Information on retirement: Date of retirement, reason for retirement, and retirement Argument information

* At this time, the claim information and the evidence-based information is called SA information, and the arguments, questions, and answers are called CA information. In the present invention, all arguments are conceptually represented as separate information, but may be integrated in the actual detailed design process. have. It is also possible to integrate SA and CA stakeholders.

* There may be a plurality of Tag information for additional description in all Arguments, and information connected with additional description information in Clause 7 also exists.

The discussion body information DB 550 is generated from the member information DB 520 as information for recording and maintaining the information of the discussion body participating in the discussion as shown in FIG. Register. In order to maintain the information of the discussion body (except Audience) who actually participated in the discussion, the information about the discussion body is defined for each discussion and this is called the discussion body information. The discussion body information consists of three essential registration information (551 ~ 553) of stakeholders, panel and moderator, and designated Audience information 554 that can be optionally defined. Since personal information is variable information, keep personal information at the time of discussion as discussion body information.

The discussion body information is extracted and registered from the member information as follows.

[Discussion Body Information] = [Discussion Information + Discussion Body Information]

where, [discussion body information]; Moderator, Panel, Stakeholders, Assigned Audience

         Discussion information; Discussion ID, Discussion Name, Discussion Period, Various Discussion Classification Information

         Discussion body information; Follow the discussion body ....

▲ Moderator: Basic personal information + <Personal Career>

▲ Stakeholder Information: Basic Data + <Contact Information>

▲ Panel Information: Basic Personal Information + <Personal Career> + Relevant Stakeholder ID

    ▲ Assigned Audience Information: Panel Name, Basic Personal Information

         *. Contact Information: Representatives in the stakeholder organization

*. <>: Notation that information is repeated multiple times

<Classification of Discussion Participants>

    -Moderator: Subject to discussion, provide preliminary information, screen panel recruitment, screen all opinions and draw conclusions. The opinion screen, which is a term used in the present invention, screens out and rejects opinions, meaningless opinions, etc. by all moderators for all arguments such as claims, objections, and recounts. The act of typing.

    Panel: The person presenting the argument and raising the objection. It is divided into a delegation panel that is pre-delegated and registered by a stakeholder's member or supporter, a specific stakeholder, and an additional arbitrarily registered panel during the discussion.

    Audience, Member: Any registered or unregistered site visitor is called Audience. The pre-registered Audience is called a member, and the member serves as a jury by voting in the verdict of the claim and may be an arbitrary panel.

     Moderators, panels, and stakeholders are registered as information subordinate to the discussion, that is, per discussion, but Audience is not per discussion.

     ▲ Moderators, panels and stakeholders are also pre-registered as members, and individual information is included in the member information.

     ▲ Designated Member, Designated Jury (Audience):

        . In the case of secret or regional discussions, or due to the nature of the debate, it may be possible to specifically limit Audience or to limit the voting officer at the stakeholder's will. These are called designated members and designated juries, respectively. Designated members or designated jury members are designated by discussion in advance (before the debate begins) by consultation with stakeholders and moderators.

    Stakeholder (Party): A panel may be a group, organization or stakeholder who is directly or indirectly affected by the results of the discussion.

<Role of Discussion Participant>

Audience, member

    Audience refers to all debate observers. In addition to nonmembers, all members and all panelists are Audience in the broad sense.

    -Members can vote on values, participate in discussions as arbitrary panels, and present their opinions to the panel.

    -Members to participate as voluntary panels must register voluntary panel before giving their opinion.

 Panel

    -The panel refers to the participants in the discussion and presents various opinions such as arguments, questions, and objections.

    -Balanced assignment of stakeholders by the delegation panel before the debate begins. In other words, the delegation panel is designated (input) by interested parties.

    -The panel shall designate a supporting stakeholder, including basic real-name information such as occupation, gender, and age, but the delegated panel shall not have a neutral or hostile opinion on the delegated stakeholder.

    -During the discussion, in addition to the existing delegated panels, additional delegated panels can be applied and real names registered.

    During the debate, at the request of a member, the moderator may temporarily select a panel. This is called an arbitrary panel, and the participation of the arbitrary panel in the discussion is limited to the claims that it has registered. In other words, only one objection to one's opinion can be recounted, and no other panelist's opinion can be opposed to question.

 moderator

    -Promote discussions and negotiate with stakeholders.

    -Consultation with each stakeholder on how to proceed with the discussion and the rules;

    -Enter basic discussion information and rules

    -Prior information of issue

    Conduct discussions, control, and termination through consultation with stakeholders;

    -Analyze each opinion of the participant and discuss the logicality of the suggested opinion and the adequacy of the expression, discuss with the commenter, and withdraw the opinion (see the comment screen).

    -Structuring of opinions presented upon receipt of unstructured opinions

    -Decision on review of counter and debate

    -Voting and arranging the results of sharply opposed values

    -Verdict of discussion

 Stakeholders

    Designation of delegation panels;

    -Confirmation with the moderator about the method and rules of discussion

    -Application for extension of the discussion period and the period for protest

The log information DB 560 records and maintains three types of performance information, including opinions of all members, voting / jury, and access / inquiry, for the following two purposes.

   ① Participation in discussion: Collect and analyze logging information that can measure the participation degree (interest) of individual members such as all panels and audiences.

   ② Record keeping of the discussion process:

      For each Argument that is newly entered, changed or deleted within the discussion period by panel, information such as handler information, processing time, processing type, and processing contents is recorded and maintained to provide a basis for generating various discussion information such as opinions and objections. Keep records.

 -Based on the feedback of the above three performance information, the criteria to decide the participation degree of members may vary depending on the nature of the discussion, the viewpoint of the operating subject of the system, and the situation. Therefore, this system does not cover the system. It can be handled arbitrarily.

Hereinafter, the effect of the Internet-based discussion system and the method described above will be described.

6 is a whole flowchart illustrating a discussion procedure according to the present invention, the discussion procedure of the present invention is largely prepared for a discussion stage (S100), a discussion workshop stage (S200), a discussion verdict stage (S300), and a discussion conclusion stage ( S400) consists of four steps.

The discussion preparation step (S100) includes a discussion decision process (S110) for determining a topic of discussion, a moderator, a stakeholder, and an audience; Discussion period decision-making process (S120) for deciding discussion period, discussion rules, discussion panel for each stakeholder; A discussion party registration process (S130) in which an operator of the discussion management server first registers a moderator to conduct a discussion, and registers the remaining discussion parties in which the registered moderator directly participates in the discussion; Discussion operation information registration process (S140) for registering the discussion basics, discussion personality classification and dictionary information; The subtopic registration process includes a subtopic registration process (S150) of registering a subtopic of discussion and determining and registering a subject party for each subtopic.

The discussion workshop step (S200) includes a discussion initiation process (S210) for notifying registration and guidance message (Msg) announcements and discussion start guide e-mails on the site on-going discussion list; Subject Opinion (SO) registration, New opinion registration guide Subject Opinion registration process (S220) to automatically notify e-mail to the discussion parties; Subject Opinion (SO) personality classification registration and rejection feedback e-mail notification opinion process (S230) and; Registration of objection (opposition, conditional presentation, inquiry, etc.) for SO, and counter notification registration process includes a counter registration process (S240) for automatic notification of e-mail to the discussion participants.

The discussion verdict step (S300) is a debating studio result processing (S310) for the studio result superiority treatment (dominance, inferiority) for the SO abandoned; SO evaluation result determination (S320) including system verdicts (see FIG. 25), such as conformity, conditional conformity, nonconformity, and reservation for the processed SO results.

The discussion closing step (S400) is a closing process (preventive measures to prevent the registration of comments) and the discussion Closing process (S410) to notify the end of the discussion notice e-mail; An on-going studio opposition treatment and a studio termination treatment process of opposing studio SO verdict treatment (S420); Claim system verdict, subtopic verdict, debate verdict processing process (S430) to handle the entire verdict.

As described above, the log-in operation of the present invention in which the entire discussion procedure is performed will be described.

7 is a log-in and menu activation process according to the present invention.

In the discussion management server 100 of the present invention, the basic information DB 510 and the member information DB 520, which are the basic system information, the discussion body information DB 550 and the discussion information DB 530, which are discussion registration information, are constructed. It is assumed that the information registration of the DB will be described later.

First, a user (member or non-member) accesses the homepage (website) of the discussion management server 100 which is a service provider through the Internet (including a network) using his terminal (S1000, S1010).

The discussion management server 100 determines whether the user connected through the Internet is a registered member, and if the registered member (YES) through the terminal (for example, a keyboard) in the member number input field located on the web browser (YES) Input, the input member number information is transmitted to the discussion management server 100 (S1020 ~ S1040).

If you are not a registered member (N0), register your membership information (basic information such as name, member ID, password, address, age, occupation, educational background, marital status, etc.) according to the prescribed sign-up procedure before discussion. Member information is registered in the member information DB 520 of the discussion management server 100 (S1041 to S1042).

Member information registration of the member information DB 520 is summarized in FIG.

-Member information is divided into individual member information (521) and stakeholder information (522) and is a standard information for generating discussion body information for each discussion. Member information is registered and maintained independently of the discussion by members. Key information disclosed should be verified by the moderator or operator.

Personal Member Information Registration

-Information about all individuals, including moderators, panels and registered members.

-Member ID and password of personal member information can be changed by individual at any time.

-Up to 10 Personal Careers can be registered. To be disclosed to others, the moderator or manager must verify the career.

-In the case of a discussion body of a moderator or panel, the moderator or operator must verify the personal identity.

Stakeholder Information Registration

-Person in charge is the person in charge of conducting discussions with the moderator on behalf of the interested party and must be an individual member belonging to the concerned party and should be extracted from the personal member information.

-Personnel recorded in stakeholder information are recorded with all persons who have participated in the discussion, and the person who participated as a representative in the discussion is recorded in the discussion body and stakeholder information.

As described above, after the member information is registered in the member information DB 520, if the member number is input through the terminal, the discussion management server 100 stores the member number input from the terminal in the member information DB 520. In operation S1040, it is determined whether the data is matched with each other.

If the member numbers match (YES), the discussion management server 100 checks the discussion body information established in the discussion body information DB (550) (S1050).

At this time, the configuration of the discussion body information built in the discussion body information DB (550) is changed according to the discussion body by member or by member, and the menu screen of the operator / moderator / interested party / audience / panel, etc. is sent to the user terminal. (S1060).

Therefore, when the user logs in, as shown in FIG. 8 on the menu screen, the discussion body is automatically divided into 'operator', 'moderator', 'stakeholder', 'Audience' and 'panel'. Only the menu for each discussion body is activated, but even if the user has not registered, various outputs and inquiries [common mode (F)] are provided to all the discussion bodies and accessors in common (S1070).

In addition, as can be seen in Figure 8, the system mode (S01 ~ S09) to be processed in the system is not activated as a menu screen on the user terminal is processed inside.

Next, a process processing operation when the user who accesses the home page is the operator (mode A) will be described with reference to FIG.

When the new discussion generation mode (A01) is selected, the discussion information registration screen is sent to the terminal so that the operator inputs basic information such as the discussion period and the discussion name, and the basic information input by the operator is the discussion of the discussion information DB 530. It is registered in the basic information 531 (S10000 to S10030).

When moderator registration designation (A02) mode is selected, the discussion body information registration screen is sent to the terminal, and the operator designates and enters the moderator, and the moderator moderator inputs the moderator information 551 in the discussion body information DB 550. It is registered (S10040-S10070).

The discussion body information registration of the discussion body information DB 550 is summarized as follows.

-Discussion Body: Stakeholder information can be registered in plural stakeholder information. If more than one is registered, it means a joint representative of the discussion.

-The discussion body information consists of moderators, stakeholders, panelists, and designated audiences who directly participate in the discussion, the operator creates a new discussion, registers the moderator, and the registered moderator registers the rest of the discussion body. Is extracted from member information, and if not a panel discussion, only moderator information is registered.

Properties: [Discussion Body Information] = [Discussion Information + Discussion Body Information]

      where, [discussion body information]; Moderator, Panel, Stakeholders, Assigned Audience

           Discussion information; Discussion ID, Discussion Name, Discussion Period, Various Discussion Classification Information

           Discussion body information; According to the discussion body.

▲ Moderator: Basic Personal Information + <Personal Career>

▲ Stakeholder Information: Basic Data + <Contact Information>

▲ Panel Information: Basic Personal Information + <Personal Career>

              ▲ Assigned Audience Information: Panel Name, Basic Personal Information

Next, a process processing operation when the user who accesses the homepage is the moderator (B mode) will be described with reference to FIGS. 11 to 17.

(1) When the discussion operation information registration (B02) is selected in moderator mode (B mode) with reference to Fig. 11, after discussing the discussion rules, the discussion information registration screen is sent to the terminal and the moderator discusses. Enter discussion operation information such as division, discussion field, and the discussion operation information input by the moderator are registered in the discussion progress information 535 of the discussion information DB 530 (S20000 to S20030).

If the discussion inputted by the moderator is the main discussion, the input information is registered in the discussion classification information 532 and the discussion rule information 534 of the discussion information DB 530 (S20040 to S20060).

The discussion information registration of the discussion information DB 530 is summarized as follows.

-Debate information is created by dividing into ① information to be basically registered (debate basic information) and ② information to be registered by the moderator with the stakeholders (discussion operation information).

-The basic discussion information refers to the discussion topic, start date & close date, discussion category, and discussion category.

 * Debate Category: Main discussion, preliminary information debate, debate debate, counter debate, re-debate, etc.

-Discussion operation information refers to the following information.

   ▲ Discussion Rules

   ▲ Discussion classification information: Classification information such as the type and nature of the discussion

   ▲ Discussion topic information (optional)

   ▲ Preliminary Information: Problems causing discussions (optional, certain stakeholders may register)

Determination of the Rules of Discussion

 -In all discussions, the preliminary consultation between the moderator and the panel shall determine the rules for the operation of discussions such as the number of times of disagreement, the number of change of opinions allowed, and the determination of suitability.

 -Once the discussion rule is decided, the moderator enters the rule information according to the discussion rule information input form provided by the system.

 -The rules of discussion may be changed from time to time by agreement between the moderator and stakeholders during the discussion.

Types of Discussion Rules

  ▲ Determination of Discussion Type: Secret / Public, Public / Region

  ▲ Discussion period and submission deadline: Discussion period and submission period, argument / response deadline, additional claims deadline

  ▲ Prior information counter time limit: It can be set differently from the counter time limit for SA.

  ▲ Whether to adopt private Argument: The registered opinion is closed until the submission time.

  ▲ Audience Free Opinion.

  ▲ Number of support requests allowed, deadline for support requests.

  ▲ Audience vote for conflicting opinion.

  ▲ Sanctions on evacuation.

  ▲ Number of comments allowed (number of comments changed, total changes).

  ▲ Whether or not to hold the verdict.

(2) The operation when the discussion body information registration (B01) is selected in the moderator mode (B mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 12. Then, the discussion type is checked to determine whether it is a panel discussion (S20100 to S20120).

As a result of the determination, if the panel discussion, the discussion body information registration screen is sent to the terminal so that the moderator inputs the discussion body information such as stakeholders, the panel, and the discussion body information input by the moderator is the panel information of the discussion body information DB 550 ( 552 and stakeholder information 554 (S20130 to S20140).

If the discussion inputted by the moderator is a secret discussion or a local discussion, the designated audience is inputted and registered in the designated audience information 553 of the discussion body information DB 550 (S20150 to S20160).

(3) Referring to Fig. 13, when the discussion subtopic registration (B03) is selected in the moderator mode (B mode), the discussion section is checked to determine whether the policy discussion is performed (S20200 to S20210).

If the determination result is a policy discussion, the discussion subtopic is automatically registered and the operation ends (S20211).

As a result of the determination, if it is not a policy discussion, the subtopic is determined and the subtopic information registration screen is sent to the terminal. When the moderator enters the subtopic information and the subject party for each subtopic, it is registered in the discussion subtopic information 533 of the discussion information DB 530. And the counter submission time limit is counted from the Subject Party designation date (S20220 ~ S20270).

Subsequently, it registers the discussion start processing list and notifies by e-mail while notifying the discussion start processing notice (S20280 to S20300).

The discussion topic topic information registration of the discussion information DB 530 is summarized as follows.

-Subtopic information registration includes ① registration and modification of subtopic classification information, and ② processes discussion development methods (SP designation) according to the subtopic characteristics.

-If it is not a policy discussion, all subtopic information is input by the moderator, and a subject party for initial SA registration is designated.

-In the case of policy discussions, the system automatically generates a claim classification as subtopic information when the Debate Subject Party finishes registering the SA claim.

Once a subtopic is registered, the system counts down the claim submission deadline.

-If a discussion topic is registered and an on-going list is registered, an e-mail will be notified with an announcement of the discussion process.

Meaning of subtopic

-The suitability of subtopic extraction as a small topic of discussion, such as the meaning, nature, necessity, and problems of the debate, is a key issue for the efficient operation of the debate (see Figure 33).

-It is a sub-topic to classify the nature of arguments for future informatization and improve the efficiency of debate. It is also a presentation classification to allow Audience to grasp the entire discussion progress by subtopic type.

-The nature of the subtopics determines the order in which opinions are expressed (see the discussion method).

-If the topic of the discussion is specific, the subtopic can be omitted.

<Example of subtopic>

* Discussion topics (pros and cons)-Will the establishment of civil unions be allowed?

   Subtopics-How are civil servants different from workers in a company?

          What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the establishment of a union?

* Discussion topics (pros and cons)-5 days work week

   Subtopic-why should I do it? Or is there a need for legislation?

          What problems are there in any group at implementation? Is that the solution?

          -How urgent is the five-day workweek?

* Discussion Topics (Solution Discussion)-Countermeasures against overheating of real estate speculation

   Subtopic-what is the problem?

          -What's the solution?

Subtopic setting

    -Except for policy discussions, subtopics should be decided by the moderator at the time of discussion and decided by consultation with stakeholders, and may be added or changed after the discussion.

    -In case of policy discussion, the subtopic setting is automatically set by the system according to the claim classification when the discussion subject completes input of the claim.

    -Subtopics can be set according to the nature of the debate or the situation of discussions, or can be set by consultation. As a result, issues settled as subtopics in certain discussions may be set as claims in other discussions.

    All claims are subordinate to this subtopic and managed in the system.

    -Once a subtopic has been determined, the moderator specifies that, depending on the nature of each subtopic, a particular Subject Party will first issue Subject Arguments on that subtopic. Therefore, the moderator should set up a subtopic so that all the stakeholders can present the Subject Argument sufficiently.

Common Items in Subtopics

    The following items are generally the main topic of the debate issue. Therefore, some or all of the following items must be set as subtopics of discussion.

  ▲ Meaning and definition of various matters: Questions to define the meaning and definition of the core contents of a matter.

Problems and solutions: Depending on the issue, problems may be replaced by necessities and solutions by effects.

  ▲ Cause, Factor: The cause of the problem, the problem about the factor.

  ▲ Urgentness of Issues: While there is a general tendency to overlook many existing discussions, it is important to consider two factors of importance and timeliness as key issues that determine the success or failure of a discussion. Timelines may be expressed in specific conditions or conditions, or in a certain period of time.

(4) The operation when the prior information registration (B04) is selected in the moderator mode (B mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 14. The discussion section is checked to determine whether or not a prior discussion is made (S20400 to S20410).

As a result of the determination, if it is not a prior discussion, after consulting the prior information, it is determined whether there is agreed prior information. If there is an agreed prior information, a dictionary information registration screen is sent to the terminal. The dictionary information is registered in the dictionary information 543 of the Argument information DB 540 (S20420 to S20460).

The prior information registration of the Argument Information DB 540 is summarized as follows.

Prior to debate, it is information that clearly defines the debate issues for the effectiveness of the debate.

Dictionary Information

-Preliminary information should consist only of the following items (hereafter preliminary information composition item classification).

. Problem: The regulation of the issue that causes the debate.

. Cause: The cause of the problem, the problem may be included in the problem may be omitted.

. Urgentness of solution: The regulation on the urgency of problem solving, which can be expressed in a timely manner or in importance.

 Prior Information Registration

-When dictionary information is created, there are two types of dictionary information (hereinafter referred to as registration information classification) and are registered by subtopic.

① Provided by the moderator

② If the moderator confirms prior information among Arguments that have been determined to be suitable as a result of prior discussion or main discussion

Prior Information Registration Form

-It is processed in the same way as Argument registration form and the following information is created.

   . Arg-id, subtopic id, registration classification, configuration item classification, registration date, prior information

-You can also register additional explanations.

Meaning of Dictionary Information

    -To clarify what is at issue to rule out useless arguments and ignorant logic before discussion. In other words, all factors that cause discussions such as problems and necessities are defined clearly before the discussion begins, and these factors are collectively referred to as problems for convenience.

    -In addition to the above factors, the dictionary information includes additional information such as the urgency of solution and terminology commentary.

    -Preliminary information is conceptually recognized as generating information on essential items of the discussion subtopic, and all discussion participants should be recognized as assumptions for all developments of the discussion.

Organization of Dictionary Information

    -Dictionary information consists of the following items.

. Current Issues : Clearly state what issues are causing the discussion.

       Ex) What is the problem in our society because there are fewer number of function delegates in the debate about reducing the number of local council members and increasing the proportion of national council members in the debate on election law revision? What does the national district representing the region mean? This will be a problem.

. Cause : The cause of the problem. It may be included in the issue or may be omitted.

. The urgency of the Resolution: Defines the urgency of the problem. This urgency can be expressed in a timely manner or in importance. Urgentness is a very important item that defines the focus of the issue in relation to the panelists' problem recognition. In some debates, the moderator cannot define this urgency, but may be specified through a preliminary discussion for problem recognition.

Provision of Prior Information

    -In case of policy debate, the proposer, such as the policy or the plan, can register the background of the proposal, that is, the problems or phenomena that occur (or are expected to occur) if they do not implement the proposal as discussion dictionary information. Organize and interpolate information.

    -In the case of general discussion, the dictionary information can be provided by the moderator or decided through the prior discussion, and the main discussion can be conducted without omitting the prior information.

    -Discussion topic topics should be provided even if no prior information is provided.

    -Opinions concluded through prior discussion may be confirmed by the moderator as advance information.

    -Also, if this discussion is conducted without prior information and prior discussion, if the opinion concluded in the debate process is thought to have the nature of prior information, the presenter can advance the information at any time through the agreement of the parties concerned. .

    -Even if preliminary information is registered, additional discussion subtopics can be created.

Registration form and objection of dictionary information

    -The form of prior information should also be in the form of opinion structure prescribed in this system, and should consist only of facts or information without specific values or claims (see Claims and Claims).

    -Preliminary information can also be disputed and discussed. The moderator must confirm the object of discussion if a reasonable objection is made to the preliminary information. Once confirmed for discussion, the relevant preliminary information shall be excluded from the preliminary information until the conclusion of the discussion.

(5) Referring to Fig. 15, when the opinion screen (B05) is selected in moderator mode (B mode), the opinion screen object list is generated and the opinion screen processing screen is sent to the terminal (S20510 to S20520). ).

Subsequently, after selecting the withdrawal and the opinion classification code by the target opinion items and checking the moderator processing, it is determined whether there is an unprocessed item, and if there is an unprocessed item, a reprocessing request message is sent to the terminal screen (S20530 to S20561).

As a result of the determination, if there is no unprocessed item, it is determined whether there is an opinion withdrawal. If there is an opinion withdrawal, the system withdrawal processing is performed to register the withdrawal record in the panel information 552 of the discussion body information DB 550, and generate the withdrawal contents. The registration information 544 of the Argument information DB 540 is registered (S20560 to S20571).

As a result of the determination, if there is no withdrawal of the opinion, the opinion classification code is registered in the Argument information DB 540, and the counter time limit for counter-counting is countered (S20570 to S20590).

The opinion screen registration of the Argument Information DB 540 is summarized as follows.

What is Screen?

-The process by which the moderator or the system analyzes these opinions on the newly registered opinions and decides the type of arguments and arguments, and registers the meaningless, duplicate or unhealthy opinions that hinder the progress of the discussion.

Ejection Processing and Sanctions

 -In order to maintain the qualitative level of the site, moderators will be screened out by thoroughly screening and dismissing any actions that interfere with the discussion (hereinafter referred to as abuse or rejection opinion) including swearing opinions, meaningless claims / arguments, and inquiries. Induce progress.

 In particular, it should be noted that the proper exit of nonsense and parallel opinions has a significant impact on the outcome of the debate process and on the verdict handling.

 -The system provides only newly registered opinions separately so that moderators can easily screen all opinions.

 -In principle, the panel which presented the rejected opinion shall apply certain sanctions.

 However, in order to prevent moderators from using their authority to arbitrarily dismiss the panel's legitimate arguments, the system essentially has the following disagreement function:

 -Classification information input for SA and OA is performed in the process of disagreement.

 System feedback on objection screen

 -As a rule, the moderator should screen the opinion directly, but the system will automatically repudiate if the SA objection is as follows.

  ▲ If the objection to the quantitative claims is a conditional suggestion.

  ▲ If the objections to non-quantitative claims are passively opposed (parallel opinion)

 -If the above happens, the system provides the exit information to the moderator.

Opinion operation

 -Any comments that have been removed by the moderator or system must be stored in the comment, along with the reasons for leaving.

 -In order to easily search for exit opinions, multi-dimensional classifications such as discussions and subtopics are conducted in the same way as normal discussions.

 -Reason for leaving: Classify as follows.

  1. Poor comments: comments that contain swear words or groundless slander

  2. Duplicate opinions: Opinions identical to those already registered by other panels (see Supplementary opinion).

  3. Nonsensical Opinion: An argument category, which is a term used in the present invention, which is a term used in the present invention. In the case of OA, the degree of correspondence to SA (completely opposite, conditions). There is an objection class that defines the presentation.

  4. Parallel Opinion: An opinion that proceeds in parallel by arguing without evidence.

 -If you are a sound panel or a moderator, this disagreement will not occur. Therefore, this function serves as a check to prevent the moderator from proceeding arbitrarily.

Sanctions for withdrawal comments

 -Panels that have sent out opinions impose warnings, restrictions on discussions, and deprivation of panel eligibility by the moderator, but the system has the function of containing and providing information for sanctions.

 -The system refuses to register comments if restrictions on discussions and panel disqualification are taken.

 -The system inputs the number of sanctions, the elapsed period, etc. for each type of sanction, and provides the function of inquiry, and the presenter can refer to the information provided by the system and input the contents of the sanctions or terminate the sanction.

 -The specific method of sanctions is determined by the pre-discussion rules and may be exempted from sanctions.

  ▲ Select personality classification of SA and OA registered during the discussion

    -SA: Ground structure and ground division

    -OA: Counter argument

  ▲ The ability of the moderator to withdraw the following opinions on all arguments presented during the discussion.

   ① Bad opinion ② Meaningless opinion ③ Overlapping opinion ④ Parallel opinion

System Provision List : The system provides the following list on the opinion screen processing screen to withdraw this opinion.

  ① Newly registered Argument.

  ② Argument that has not performed opinion screen among registered arguments.

  ③ Newly changed opinion

Opinion Screen Processing : Using the Opinion Screen processing screen , do the following.

  ① Moderator:

    -In case of exit, enter the reason for exit and sanction for the appropriate exit opinion according to the discussion rules. (If not, enter exit screen information in the relevant Argument.)

    -Enter SA and OA personality classification information.

② system processing:

    -An exit comment is deleted from the Argument information and is created in the exit comment along with the reason for exit.

    -The exit record for the panel is included in the discussion body information and panel information.

(6) The operation when the support request review (B05-1) is selected in the moderator mode (B mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 16, and the discussion studio situation screen is sent to the terminal for the moderator to review the support request. (S20510-S20520).

Subsequently, the request is reviewed to determine whether there is a cancellation, and if there is a cancellation, the forced closing is selected and the forced closing is registered in the Argument information DB 540, which is notified by E-mail (S20720 to S20760).

(7) Referring to Fig. 17, when the moderator verdict (B07) is selected in moderator mode (mode B), it is determined whether or not the discussion is a policy discussion in order to determine the moderator. The claim basis verdict status screen is sent to the terminal (S20800 ~ S20820).

Subsequently, after designating and checking the main evidence, if all of the main evidence is suitable, the conformance judgment is registered in the Argument information DB 540. If some of the main evidence is inappropriate, the non-conformance judgment is registered in the Argument information DB 540. If the basis is part of the reservation, the reservation determination is registered in the Argument information DB 540 (S20830 to S20871).

If the main basis is not some reservation, the conditional conformity is registered in the Argument Information DB 540 to store the moderator verdict tag (S20870 to S20880).

As a result of the determination, if it is a policy discussion, a necessity presentation, a solution, a problem, and a countermeasure are checked, and if a conformance requirement is registered, the conformity decision is registered in the Argument information DB 540; If the reservation is required, the reservation is registered in the Argument information DB 540 (S20900 to S20931).

If it is not the reservation requirement, the conditional match is registered in the Argument information DB 540 (S20932).

(8) Explain the operation when Audience Poll (B20) is selected in moderator mode (B mode).

Poll Execution Condition

 -Audience poll is executed only when the following three conditions are met for the initial Subject Argument.

  1.If the original SA is found to be in conflict;

  2. If the basis of original SA is tone tone (value)

  3. The discussion rule stipulates conducting an Audience Poll.

How to do it

 -Instead of asking whether you want to ask or not, you will be able to identify the tendency towards how to recognize the cold and reflective reasons, so that more empirical convergence can be achieved.

 Pros and cons is the allotment of SAs and CAs (hereinafter referred to as the Opinion), which are presented during the debate process, with SA being in favor and CA being in opposition.

 -The polling period is defined in the discussion rules, and when the poll is executed, the system automatically sends the poll implementation instructions to the audience by e-mail.

 -Depending on the case, a limited audience may be chosen through sampling to prevent intentional intensive voting by specific classes.

 -Audience to vote must be a registered member of the real name of the system, and if it extends to a non-member, verification of real name (resident number, name, e-mail, address, type of job) must be done. Check it through mail.

 -Check the login information to find a system that verifies one vote.

Conduct result processing of Poll

 When the poll is over, the system automatically provides the pros and cons for all audiences, and also provides information such as voter's region, gender, age, and occupation to determine the bias of the vote.

 -Poll results are automatically recorded in the score report.

Next, a process processing operation when the user who accesses the home page is a stakeholder (C mode) will be described with reference to FIG.

When the delegation panel registration (C01) is selected, the discussion body information registration screen is sent to the terminal so that stakeholders register the delegation panel with the panel information 552 of the discussion body information DB 550, and the support request (C02) is selected. When the process proceeds to step S40200 to be described later to process the support request and reply operation (S30000 ~ S30010).

When the support request registration (C02-1) is selected, the request message creation screen is sent to the terminal to create a request statement, and the request statement is registered in the Argument information DB 540 and reflected in the discussion studio status (S30100 to S30130).

Subsequently, the objection period is extended to register with the Argument information DB 540 and the E-mail is notified to enter the review request review (B05-1) mode (S30140 to S30150).

Next, the process processing operation when the user connected to the home page is the delegated panel (D mode) will be described with reference to FIGS. 19 to 22.

(1) The operation when the claim registration D01 is selected in the panel mode (D mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 19. If the claim type is determined, if the claim is made, the presence or absence of the editor is checked to determine whether the editor is installed. (S40000 ~ S40010).

If the Editor is not installed, the Editor is automatically downloaded, and when the Editor is installed, the Editor is sent and the Editor screen is sent to the terminal (S40020 to S40040).

When inputting a comment on the Editor screen, the comment is uploaded and the comment is registered in the Argument Information DB 540, and automatically notifies that a new comment has been registered (S40050 to S40070).

Change opinion

-Registered opinions (SA & OA) may be deleted or changed once or in part by the registrant except in the following cases (hereinafter referred to as "progressive opinions"). do)

     . Countered by others

     . When comments are added by others

 -The change of opinion means to replace the original opinion with a completely new one. The system automatically notifies the discussion person by e-mail of the change.

 If the opinion changes, the system automatically extends the time limit for protest.

 -A comment can be changed only once for one comment, and the total number of changes may be limited by the discussion rule information set before the discussion.

Withdraw opinion

 -The proceedings cannot be changed. However, if the panel which registered the opinions submits to the objection or judges that the presented opinion is defective, it may withdraw the opinion arbitrarily.

 -If a comment is withdrawn, the system reflects the comment and objection in the screen presentation so that Audience can recognize it as a retracted opinion, and automatically informs all parties involved of the revocation by e-mail and disagrees with the objection. Prevent the query from being registered.

 -Rejected opinions as well as objections and inquiries about the withdrawn comments cannot be modified or deleted.

 Alternative opinion

 -In case of withdrawal of the opinions suggested by some defects, alternative opinions can be registered once. The alternative opinion, however, should be a change in the content of the original opinion and cannot be a new opinion that is not completely related to the original opinion.

 -Once an alternative opinion is registered, the moderator can compare the original opinion with the original opinion as well as the opinion screen, and then confirm and justify the alternative opinion.

 -Once a substitute opinion is registered, the system should take measures so that Audience can query the original opinion and objections in conjunction with the alternative opinion.

 -Alternative opinions must be registered within 24 hours of withdrawal. If a substitute opinion is not registered after the comment is withdrawn, the system automatically verifies that opinion.

(2) The operation when the objection registration (D02) is selected in the panel mode (D mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 20. The discussion argument situation screen is sent to the terminal, and the object argument is designated by specifying the argument object for objection. Determine whether the screen (S40100 ~ S40130).

As a result of the determination, if the target argument is not the opinion screen, an error message is sent to the terminal screen (S40131). If the target argument is the opinion screen, the objection input screen is sent to the terminal and the opinion is uploaded. 540), and automatically notify that a new opinion has been registered (S40140 ~ S40170).

Argument information DB (540) claims and objection registration is summarized as follows.

Type and method of input

 SA input: input, addition and change of new arguments and related arguments

   -Additional information input: Additional information such as the classification of inputter, claim, and argument

 · Argument, Query Input: Input Counter Argument such as objection, query for specific Argument number except SA

Input method: Enter Off-line as shown in FIG. 33 using the opinion structure registration screen (see Opinion structure registration).

The key feature of opinion structured registration of this system is

① Break-down and structured registration of various opinions (claims and objections) by argument (recognition and derivation of problems)

② Develop interactive discussion workshops among panelists under certain debate rules on issues confronting each issue (accumulation of knowledge and conflicts).

③ The conclusion of the discussion based on the results of the debate workshop and the debate rules are drawn.

④ The purpose of this discussion is to provide consensus and public opinion by providing systematic information to all audiences through structured presentation (consensus, understanding).

Subject Argument (SA) Input: Enter the SA using the structured input screen.

· Counter Argument (CA) Input: Enter the Counter Argument such as objection, query, etc. for a specific Argument except SA and select the corresponding Argument into On-line.

Structured registration

    -It is the input by the formatted editor of the off-line structured by breaking down the assertion and the basis of SA for information and interactivity of discussion.

    -Develop, download and process a special editor of Active X method for formatted input processing.

    -Downloaded Editor is executed automatically by server program.

Editor function

    -The Editor has general text editing functions such as input, copy, and alignment, and automatically creates a text frame composed of representative words and text (see FIG. 37).

    -Editor uploads all the entered information to DB when input is completed. If there is a problem with the communication with the server, it is temporarily saved on the PC and manually uploaded by the user in the future.

    -The input screen consists of the input window of each Argument and the Viewer window where the entered arguments can be viewed. The completed Argument is automatically moved to the Viewer screen.

    -In the Viewer panel, each claim-based object varies in size, and therefore, a visualization, such as movement, resizing, and alignment, is provided for visualization.

    -Argument input window is used for all Argument input.

· Processing of explanations and addendums

    -Ability to add terms, concepts, etc. that are difficult for Audience.

    -Addendum provides the following functions for Audience to provide sub-window screen when clicked.

    -If you mark the word or sentence and select the sub description ICON, the sub screen is provided.

    -Marked words, sentences, and subscreens are managed internally by forming information as a pair.

· Representative word

    -As a content that can abbreviate the claim, this representative word becomes the key for the claim.

    -Representative words should be treated as one line.

    -It is the key of argument during the discussion and the key of information after the discussion.

    -Many Arguments are difficult to display on the screen, so the representative word should be treated as existing.

Object Argument and Counter Argument

 -The first objection against the first subject argument is called the first object argument.

 -The counter-argument of the subject panel against the objection, and the counter-argument about it, are all called counter arguments.

 In addition, the Counter Argument of the Subject panel and the Object panel is classified and referred to as Subject Counter Argument and Object Counter-Argument, respectively.

Argument Correspondency

 -There may be a plurality of initial object arguments for a single subject argument.

 In addition, there may be a plurality of Counter Arguments for one Argument. However, one Counter Argument is not allowed for multiple Arguments.

Personality classification

 -In response to the personality classification for the original SA, the first objection is also classified, and these personalities are reflected in the verdict along with the results of the debate and the SA (see Argument verdict).

 -If there is more than one initial objection for one SA, the moderator assigns all the personality classifications so that a plurality of studios can occur.

 -Counter Argument depends on SA and OA, respectively, and determines the outcome of discussion workshop about the SA. Therefore, the personality classification for all counter arguments is omitted.

Registration of objection

 -All objections must be registered by specifying the Argument to object.

 -Registration of objection must be registered in On-line mode unlike SA registration.

Specify type of objection (personality classification)

 When the first objection against SA, Object Argument, is registered, the moderator specifies the nature of the objection.

 -Objection personality should be classified into the following three types, and logically parallel objections cannot be dismissed.

  ▲ Provide opposition to the opponent's argument,

  ▲ suggest the conditions for the establishment of a relative claim

  ▲ When inquiring about a relative claim

 -If a registered objection does not apply to the above classification, the moderator shall withdraw from the opinion in a nonsensical manner as in the classification of claims grounds.

Dissent

 -There are active oppositions, such as negative oppositions that present adverse effects, problems, facts, and oppositions, as well as logical denials and arguments of facts about Argument.

 Negative opposition should be opposed to facts and measures that are quantitative. In addition, passive opposition is not seen as an objection to the total denial of Argument, but merely as an argument that presents a problem.

 -Negative opposition to non-quantitative Argument is a parallel objection or meaningless opinion.

<Case>

  . If we argue against the non-quantitative claims that "the Koreans still withdraw from the US military, the risk of invading North is very high" → "The damages to our society due to the presence of US troops are very large." It can be said to be an objection. Does the ROK military lack sufficient defenses against these non-quantitative claims? Or, some percent of Koreans think so, but it must be countered by suggestion or inquiry.

Conditional presentation

 -Recognize the claim, but present the conditions, assumptions, and exceptions (hereinafter referred to as "claim conditions") for the claim to be made. Unlike the dissenting opinion, the claim can be presented only if the claim is of value. .

 -Conditional suggestion can be simply a propositional defensive conditional suggestion that suggests a condition, or, conversely, an aggressive conditional suggestion that suggests a condition to be asserted and asserts that the claim is inappropriate.

 -Aggressive conditional suggestions are considered to be active.

 -Defensive Conditional Representation has the effect of recognizing that even the best claims are not of absolute value or fact and are active against the right circumstances and times.

 -Conditional suggestion is generally presented by the objector, but may be presented by the claimant himself (hereinafter referred to as arbitrary objection).

 Arbitrary objection presented by the Subject panel may also be the object of objection.

Q & A

 -Inquiry is an Argument that asks an opponent to answer in principle. It is divided into two types.

  . Counter: Query to extract blind spots or contradictions

  . Question: A query where there is an element of uncertainty in a relative claim.

 -The query must specify the target Argument, and in the case of a half sentence, more than one can be specified, but in the case of a question, the corresponding Argument must be uniquely specified.

 -Statements and questions must be answered.

 -If the deadline for answering a question has elapsed, the system and the moderator consider the subject Argument to be withdrawn and process it.

 -If the answer to a half sentence is also a half sentence, it is regarded as a half-answer. Reprint

 -Answers to questions can also be questions:

 -If a question or a question is answered with affirmative or negative, the answerer must answer with affirmative or negative, but if the content of the question is difficult to answer with affirmative or negative, the answer can be denied.

 Inquiries can also be conducted by moderators and audiences.

Preferential question of moderator

 -The moderator first raises an inquiry or objection to the newly registered SA or OA before raising the Object Panel. The moderator's question should be the first to be answered because it will be a question that many panels are expected to have in common.

 Therefore, the moderator may reserve the OA of all panels arbitrarily until the moderator answers the question.

Opposition to Dictionary Information

 -. Dictionary information registered by the Subject Party may also be subject to objection. The system should treat the preliminary information as the same as the SA so that any panel can raise a counter-argument.

 -. If an objection to prior information occurs, it means that the prior information should be considered as requiring discussion. Therefore, the moderator shall immediately convert the objection to the SA through the opinion screen and induce mutual discussion between the subject party and the objector. The exception is if this objection is a question.

 -. The time limit for opposition to prior information is agreed in advance by the rules of discussion.

Characterization of Multiple Initial Objections

 -If there is more than one initial objection for an SA, the moderator assigns each personality classification.

 The system automatically determines the representative objection to reflect in the debate workshop results according to the order of objection intensity below with reference to each objection character.

● active opposition, suggesting offensive conditions, opposition> passive opposition, defensive opposition> questions

(3) The operation when the support request (D03) is selected in the panel mode (D mode) is explained with reference to FIG. 21, and the discussion type of the discussion basic information 531 registered in the discussion information DB 530 is checked. Determine whether the discussion type is general or panel discussion (S40200 ~ S40220).

As a result of the determination, if it is not a general and panel discussion, an error message is sent to the screen of the terminal (S40221). If the general and panel discussion, the allowable number of stakeholder information 554 registered in the discussion body information DB 550 is checked. If exceeded, an error message is sent (S40230 to S40241).

If the allowed number of times is not exceeded, the discussion studio situation screen is sent to the terminal, and the objection objection objection is sent when an objection time limit has elapsed for two days (S40250 to S40290).

If the objection time limit does not pass 2 days, the process proceeds to S30100 and registration of support request (C02-1) is performed.

(4) Referring to Fig. 22, the operation when the reply acceptance (D03-1) is selected in the panel mode (D mode) will be described. The discussion studio situation screen will be sent to the terminal to determine whether to accept the reply. If not determined to accept and notified by e-mail and delete the reply to register in the Argument Information DB (540) (S40300 ~ S40332).

If it is acceptable, the reply content is publicly registered and the time limit for the counter-registration is registered in the Argument information DB 540, and a deadline query screen is sent to the terminal to determine whether the support request is closed (S40330 to S40360).

As a result of the determination, if the support request is closed, the support request is deleted and registered in the Argument information DB 540 (S40361). If the support request is not closed, the deadline is checked and the support request is deleted if the deadline is exceeded. It registers at 540 (S40370-S40380).

The support request and reply registration are summarized as follows.

 -A request for support is an act of asking an unspecified audience or panel to support their argument to supplement an Argument that can supplement their opinion.

 -Requests for support and deadlines can only be applied to panel discussions, not policy discussions, and are carried out by the relevant stakeholder or delegation panel (hereinafter referred to as supporters).

 -Argument that can request support can only target Counter Argument such as objection, recount, and query except SA. In other words, it can be requested only when the panel is in the process of discussion about a specific SA and the opinion by expert knowledge is required because it is opposed to the fact or tone that the panel cannot predict in advance.

 -If a support request occurs, the moderator may review it and forcibly cancel (forced closing) the support request if it cannot be deemed necessary.

 -The support requester must prepare and register a request requesting support, and the system treats the registered request as an argument that cannot be countered, and reflects it in the discussion studio status until the request is closed. Take action to be posted.

Handling of Responses to Support Requests

 -Responding to a support request response (hereinafter referred to as AA (Advocacy Argument) reply) is to submit a comment on the support request. The support requester may register a reply (hereinafter referred to as indirect reply).

 -A direct reply can be made by any member through the registration process of an arbitrary panel, but can only act as an arbitrary panel.

 -If a direct reply is registered, the system immediately treats it as a private argument and notifies the requestor via e-mail so that the requestor can review the reply and refuse to register or accept the registration. At this time, the rejected AA is unconditionally deleted, and the accepted AA is officially registered and can be opposed by others.

 -The requester's review of the direct reply is limited to the Argument that was first returned. Subsequent disputes about the Argument may be conducted regardless of the requester. However, the requestor may suspend the respondent's right to participate in the discussion at any time.

 -The moderator can also retire the Advocacy Argument through the opinion screen as with other arguments prior to the requester's review. However, it is up to the requester to determine whether the reply is in accordance with the request.

Time management according to support request

 -The request for support must be made within 48 hours from the time when the objection deadline begins.

 -The support request will automatically extend the time limit for protest against the SA, resulting in an extension of the discussion period. Therefore, the discussion rule limits the number of times allowed by stakeholders and determines the support request deadline.

 -When support request is made, the time limit for protest is extended to +2 days of support request deadline.

Support Request Deadline

 -Closing a request for support means not requesting further opinions.

 -The deadline for support requests may be closed by the support requester before the deadline.

 -If the deadline is not reached by the deadline set in the discussion rules, the system will automatically complete the deadline and consider it a waiver of submission.

 When the support request is closed, the system deletes the posting of the support request and prevents entry of the support request reply.

Next, the process processing operation when the user who accesses the home page is Audience (E mode) will be described with reference to FIG.

If the objection (query) (E01) is selected, proceed to S40000 to perform the claim and objection registration. If the free opinion presentation (E02) is selected, proceed to S50101 and register the free opinion, and if the support request reply (E03) is selected, The discussion workshop situation screen is sent out, and Audience selects an Argument to be returned and registers an arbitrary panel (S50000 ~ S50420).

Subsequently, the reply input screen is sent to the terminal, and the input is privately processed and then registered in the Argument information DB 540, and the input screen is notified by E-mail, and then the opinion screen is processed (S50430 to S50450).

Audience Participation in Discussion

    -Audience's participation in discussion is threefold: ① direct participation in discussion through questions on the panel and free opinions; ② voting on the values in conflict with the results of the discussion. ③ pros and cons for each argument.

Dialogue with Audience

    -Issues such as the division of pharmacy are of interest to the general public, but they are not subject to discussion due to lack of expertise, but there are many questions as consumers. This question is too common for the panel and may be excluded from discussion.

    However, no matter how unprofessional Audience is, most issues are public and public, so overlooking Audience's questions can lead to public disregard.

Audience's Quality

    Audience may ask or question a specific panel (or stakeholder).

    -Questions and statements should be structured and input in the same way as comment registration for future informatization.

    -As the statement is for discussion purposes, it is treated as Audience's query, not panel, and treated as the panel's query.

    -Audience inquiries are also screened by the moderator and must be answered by the panel. However, if an answer and material are repeated for a query, this can be extended to discussion beyond the question, so that the moderator will adjust it or the answerer will give up the answer.

    -Since questions and answers should be paired with information provided to Audience, the information provision method is provided as a method of visualization of claims and objections.

Audience's Free Opinion

    -General Audience, not an arbitrary panel, accepts the ability to express opinions freely from time to time, regardless of the format and rules of this discussion, as in general discussion sites, but must be presented for each Argument. Is called)

    -Audience opinions can be submitted to all Arguments, rather than structured ones, but opinion screens are rough. In addition, for each Argument, three divisions of agreement, disagreement, and neutrality can be specified, and the presentation of the opinions presented is provided for each of the three divisions.

    -Audience opinions are only for hearing opinions on each Argument registered by the panel and are not intended for discussion. Therefore, opinions (ripples) on Audience opinions are not provided.

    -Acceptance of Audience opinion may not be allowed by agreement of the discussion rules between interested parties.

Audience Poll

    A verdict may be made by voting on the conflicting values of the discussion (see Closing).

Next, the process processing operation in the system (S mode) will be described with reference to FIGS.

(1) The operation of the discussion studio processing S01 in the system mode (S mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 24. When the counter time limit is exceeded by checking the counter time limit for all SAs, it is determined whether the OA has given up the counter action ( S70000 ~ S70300). As used in the present invention, SA studio processing means that the system automatically processes the results of the studio as a predominance, inferiority, or confrontation when one of the parties submits or exceeds the time limit for objection.

As a result of the determination, if the OA abandons the counterattack, the SA is predominantly processed (S70031). If the OA does not abandon the counterattack, it is determined whether the list is terminated after the SA inferior processing (S70040 to S70050).

The processing of the discussion studio result is summarized as follows.

    The system performs the following tasks in batch mode every day at 24:00 during the discussion period.

   The system screens all Subject Arguments that have been abandoned.

   · Disclosure of rebellion is recorded in Argument information according to SA or OA.

      ● the CA has given up the objection; SA advantage

      ● SA has given up the objection; Thirteen

      ● If neither of them gave up; Opposition

Debate period, time for submitting claim, time for protest

 -The discussion period is the period from the start date to the end date of the discussion, and the time limit for submitting a claim is the time limit for registering the first Subject Arguments asserted by each stakeholder. The time limit for objection is the time limit for objection against each Subject Argument. The time limit for objection also includes the same objection time for recounting the objection, inquiring about the question, and answering.

 -The discussion period, the time limit for submitting a claim, and the time limit for protest are determined in advance in the rules of discussion.

 -In principle, the same time limit applies regardless of the issue of each Argument.

Extended discussion deadline

 -All discussion deadlines may be extended by requesting the moderator by agreement between the parties concerned. However, the time limit for protest can be extended within the discussion period.

 -The actual discussion period is automatically extended to the time limit for objection against the last registered objection for the opportunity of recounting the objection presented at the end of the debate.

Additional Claim Deadline

 -The moderator may close new registrations of additional claims to prevent certain interested parties from deliberately registering material claims late to prevent them from drawing conclusions within the time frame of the discussion.

 -The deadline for additional claims can be made after the initial submission deadline has passed, and the deadline for additional claims is notified to each panel in advance.

Notice and inquiry of the end of the discussion period and the deadline for objection

 -The system automatically notifies the relevant person 3 days before the end of the discussion period and 1 day (24 hours) before the end of the dispute period.

 The system makes it possible to query the time limit for opposition to each claim (or a recount of opposition, etc.).

 -In principle, no post-action objection (or re-argument) shall not be accepted for alleged roots or objections for which no objection (or re-argument) has not been filed until the time limit for the objection has expired. have.

(2) The operation of the SA verdict (S02) in the system mode (S mode) will be described with reference to FIG. 25. Then, the discussion workshop information is checked to determine whether the discussion workshop is finished (S70100 to S70120). The term SA verdict used in the present invention is that the system automatically performs the final verdict on the thread in consideration of the verdict portfolio based on the SA personality classification and the OA personality classification. it means.

As a result of the determination, if the discussion workshop ends, the SA and OA personality classifications are checked. If the conformance requirements are met, the conformity judgment is registered in the Argument information DB 540. If the conformance requirements are met, the condition conformance judgment is registered in the Argument information DB 540. If not, the non-compliance determination is registered in the Argument information DB 540, and if not, the verdict reservation determination is registered in the Argument information DB 540 (S70130 to S70170).

Subsequently, it is determined whether the assertion-based structure is dependent, and if it is dependent, it is determined that the dependent Argument is the same, and if it is not dependent, it is determined whether the list is terminated (S70180 to S70190).

The SA verdict of the system is summarized as follows.

    The system performs the following tasks in batch mode every day at 24:00 during the discussion period.

   . Checks for all SAs whether debate workshop information (dominance, inferiority, confrontation) is recorded.

   . For the SA where the information of the discussion studio is recorded, the SA is verdicted based on the results of the discussion workshop and the ruling.

The Argument verdict rule for the discussion studio result is summarized in FIG. 30.

Verification Principles

    The verdict on the grounds of claim applies without exception to all discussions except free discussion.

    -Argument's verdict reflects the following three factors collectively and decides whether it is appropriate, conditional, inadequate or reserve, or performs an Audience Poll.

    -If the assertion basis of a nonconforming Argument is dependent, the system automatically disqualifies the related Argument as well.

Argument Verdict Factor

    -The verdict on Argument considers the following three things, which are summarized in FIG.

     ▲ Debate workshop results: Determination of superiority in the debate workshop

     ▲ Characteristic of SA: According to the type of argument basis (facts and values) when the results of the debate workshop are in conflict

     ▲ Nature of CA: Verdict processing based on 3 types of objections, objection, and question

Debate Studio Superior Decision Processing

    -If one side of the debate does not present an objection within the time limit for opposition, it is called abandonment of opposition.

     ● the CA has given up the objection; SA advantage

     ● SA has given up the objection; Thirteen

     ● If neither of them gave up; Opposition

    If there are a plurality of CounterArgs for a particular Argument, if one of the plurality of CounterArgs is rejected, it is considered that they have been given up for the whole of the plurality.

Argument Verdict Rule

Requirements for conformity

    -If SA is dominant in the debating workshop, it is unconditionally determined to be appropriate.

Conditional Requirements

    -If the debate studio concludes that the SA is inferior, it is found to be conditional if the objection (CA) is passive or conditional.

Nonconformity

    -If the SA is inferior by an active objection or inquiry by the debate, the verdict is inappropriate.

Reservation

    -If the result of the debate is conflict and the SA is true, the verdict is reserved.

Audience Poll

    -Audience Poll shall be conducted only if SA is valuable and the outcome of the debate workshop is in conflict.

Verdict in cases where more than one objection is presented

    When multiple object arguments are presented for one Subject Argument, the verdict for the corresponding SA is processed as follows according to the OA type.

     ▲ If SA prevails over all objections: fit

     If the SA is inferior to any of the active objections or queries: inappropriate

     ▲ SA prevails over all active objections, but if any one of negative arguments or conditional claims is inferior: Conditional conformity subject to the objection

(3) The operation of the discussion Closing (S03) in the system mode (S mode) is described with reference to FIG. 26. The discussion period is checked to determine whether the discussion period ends (S70300 to S70320).

As a result of the determination, if the discussion period ends, the discussion is closed and the actual discussion period is calculated, and the actual discussion period is registered in the discussion rule information 534 of the discussion information DB 530 and notified by E-mail (S70330 ~ S70350).

The discussion Closing of the system is as follows.

At the end of the discussion period, the system performs the following closing on 24:00:

    -Deadline for discussion: The following measures shall be taken to prevent the extension of the time for submitting various opinions.

   . Save the discussion deadline in the discussion progress information (allows the associated registration program to register additional comments).

    -Calculation of actual discussion end time: Calculate the actual discussion end time by calculating the time limit for argument of the last registered Argument and save it in the discussion rule information.

    -Deadline notification to discussion parties: Automatically notify the deadline by e-mail.

E-mail is a subsystem for automatically notifying the stakeholders about key progress and changes in all discussions during the discussion period. It is developed as a dedicated e-mail engine for the system.

     . Automatically determine the appropriate recipients for all messages sent.

     . It has a function to check whether the receiver is read.

     . It is possible to inquire by case with connection information of all message transmission and reply.

 -Address book management: Member information is used.

Closing

 Closing means that the discussion is closed by the moderator when the discussion period ends.

 -However, if there is an argument that has not passed the deadline for a particular Argument even after the discussion deadline has passed, the actual debate will be extended until the deadline for the counter-argument.

 -Once the discussion is over, no further comments can be made.

Verdict

 -A verdict is the conclusion of a debate by the system or the moderator at the end of the debate period by drawing conclusions under certain principles about the debate.

 -The verdict of the verdict is: (1) verdict on the basis of each claim by the system

                ② It consists of two stages of verdict (debater verdict) for the whole discussion based on the verdict of each argument by the moderator.

 -A discussion verdict may be reserved by prior agreement of the interested parties (discussion rules).

 -The verdict based on the argument is automatically handled by the system from time to time when the discussion studio for each SA ends, but the verdict on the whole discussion is processed after the discussion is closed by the moderator with reference to the verdict on the argument. .

 -The verdict of Subject Argument can be pre-informed by the moderator at any time in order to prevent duplicate discussions, and will be automatically knowledgeed by the system when the discussion is closed.

 -The verdict of the debate must be made by the moderator, and the verdict summary table on the basis of the assertion by the system is automatically attached, which is shown in FIG.

Debate Studio Superior Decision Processing

 -If one side of the debate does not present an objection within the time limit for opposition, it is called abandonment of opposition.

  ● the CA has given up the objection; SA advantage

  ● SA has given up the objection; Thirteen

  ● If neither of them gave up; Opposition

 If there are a plurality of CounterArgs for a particular Argument, if one of the plurality of CounterArgs is rejected, it is considered that they have been given up for the whole of the plurality.

(4) Referring to Fig. 27, the operation of the conflict verdict S04 in the system mode (S mode) is checked by checking whether or not a new CA is registered (S70400 to S70420).

As a result of the determination, if a new CA registration is registered, the conflict is registered in the Argument information DB 540, and if it is not a new CA registration, it is determined whether or not the actual discussion period has elapsed.

If there is an SA value, polling is performed to process Audience Poll (S70460 ~ S70470).

The confrontational processing of the system is summarized as follows.

From the next day of discussion Closing treatment, the following treatment is performed at 24:00 every day.

    The outcome of the debate workshop will be decided as a confrontation only after the closing of the debate. In other words, if a new CA is registered after the deadline, the results of the debate workshop on the SA are treated as conflict.

    -If the conflicting SA is of value, conduct the Audience Poll according to the discussion rules.

    -Also, if the CA is not registered by the end of the actual discussion time, the discussion studio result will be treated as prevailing or inferior and the final verdict of the remaining SA Argument will be performed.

(5) When the operation of the assertion verdict (S05) in the system mode (S mode) is explained with reference to Figs. 28 and 29, the discussion progress information is automatically notified if the assertion is terminated by checking the SA verdict report by the assertion as an instruction to conduct the verdict verdict. The mode (S09) is entered (S70500 to S70530).

If all the claims are not the end of the claim, if the SA is a conformance requirement, the conformity determination is registered in the Argument information DB (540). ), And if the condition conforms to or conforms to, the condition conformance determination is registered in the Argument information DB 540 (S70540 to S70571).

The system verdict tag is stored for all SAs, and the SA verdict summary table is generated and stored in the SA verdict summary file (S70580 to S71010).

Subsequently, the discussion verdict processing screen is sent to the terminal, and the subtopic verdict is determined by specifying whether or not the minor verdict is determined, and it is determined whether or not the minor verdict is completed (S71020 to S71050).

As a result of the determination, if the subtopic verdict is not completed, the subtopic verdict is determined as verdict Type = 1, and if the verdict Type = 1, the subtopic verdict is input to register the subtopic verdict in the discussion subtopic information 533 of the discussion information DB 530. (S71060-S71062).

As a result of the determination, if the verdict Type = 1 is not sent, a subtopic verdict writing screen is sent to create a subtopic verdict, and the verdict is registered in the discussion subtopic information 533 of the discussion information DB 530 (S71070 to S71090).

As a result of the determination of S71050, when the subtopic verdict is completed, the discussion verdict writing screen is sent, a discussion verdict is made, and the verdict verdict is registered in the discussion basic information 531 of the discussion information DB 530 (S71051 to S71053).

It is determined whether the discussion verdict is verdict Type = 1, and if verdict Type = 1, the discussion verdict is input to register the discussion verdict in the discussion basic information 531 of the discussion information DB 530 (S71054 to S71056).

The verdict processing of the system is summarized as follows.

Verification Process Overview

-The verdict on the discussion can be handled by the moderator by considering the meaning and importance of each SA based on the verdict on SA, and divided into three stages: verdict by claim, verdict by subtopic, and verdict on the whole discussion. If there are few issues, you can make a verdict all over the discussion.

 The verdict on a claim must be verdicted as appropriate, conditional, inadequate, or reserved, regardless of the type of discussion.

 -The verdict on the subtopic and the whole discussion can be made in two forms depending on the nature of the debate and the SA verdict:

  ▲ Type1: In case of verdict of conformity, conditionality, inadequacy, reservation

     . Policy debate and pros and cons

  ▲ Type2: In case of writing only verdict

    . Subtopics and discussions of all solution discussions

    . In case of non-policy debate:

Verdict

 -The verdict summary of the system is automatically attached to the discussion verdict regardless of the verdict type, and the verdict by the moderator is prepared and attached. The verdict should clearly state the basis of the preponderance or inferiority (argument) and, in the case of Type1, the requirement to be reversed.

Verdict Principles on Claims

 -The verdict on the claim is made by the moderator, but the following principles should be observed.

 -In the verdict on the claim, the verdict on the basis of the claim is that if the claim is found to be suitable, the argument must be recognized as a prerequisite or assumption for the conformity of the claim, if there is an argument based on the nonconforming verdict.

Conformance requirements

 -General Discussion: When some Arguments among the presented Arguments are inadequate, the main evidence is judged to be appropriate, and therefore the whole point of the argument is judged to be quite appropriate.

 -Policy discussion: When both the plan and the necessity suggestion are appropriate

              Problem presentations and case presentations do not have to be regarded as fatal flaws in the suitability of a claim even if they receive a nonconformity verdict.

Nonconforming requirements

 -Policy discussion: If any of the suggestions and queries are inappropriate.

 General Discussion: Some or all of the major evidence Arguments are found to be ineligible and therefore the whole point of the claim is not appropriate.

Verdict Reservation Requirements

 -Policy discussion: If any of the proposals and measures are reserved.

 General Discussion: Some or all of the main evidence Arguments have been reserved, so that the whole point of the claim cannot be said to be appropriate or inappropriate.

Subtopic and Discussion Verdict

 -The verdict on the subtopic and the whole discussion should be handled by the moderator, and a written verdict should be attached.

-The verdict shall be prepared by the moderator, but in the case of Type1, the requirements for the verdict are also presented.

-The system automatically attaches the verdict summary table regardless of the verdict type.

Verification process : The debate verdict is conducted after the end of the debate.

First, the moderator conducts a possible system assertion verdict for the system.

-A moderator or a system conducts a distinction between a policy debate and a general debate based on the principle of claim verdict on claims that cannot be system verdicted.

-The system stores tag information of various verdict reports and verdicts by the system or moderators in the claim argument.

-The moderator decides whether to omit the subcommittee verdict.

-Verdicts on subtopics or the whole discussion are carried out by type, and the verdict of the moderator and the summary of verdicts by the system are attached.

As described above, the process processing contents of the discussion management server 100 in which the entire discussion processing is performed are summarized in a table in FIG. 32.

4. Output function

The following outlines the types, nature, and processing of the core output data used in the system.

    -In this system, the representation of all information is three-dimensional. Therefore, almost all output is provided only on the screen in principle.

(1) General Specifications

Basic screen composition : Main screen of the site and each discussion status screen

    Main screen: Provides a list of the issues in dispute at a glance.

     . List of Issues: Discussion Name (3-4 On-going Discussions)

     . Contents of the issue: Phrase descriptions of major issues that may be of interest, or confrontations that emerged during discussions. These are sensational phrases that may interest Audience.

    -Discussion Screen: The main progress of each issue should be identified at a glance.

     . Highlights of main opinions, conflicting opinions, etc.

     . Dominant claim, highlight of new claim

Main Menu of Main Screen

    -Purpose of the site: Express the purpose, philosophy, etc.

    -How to discuss: Help on how to discuss, note, etc.

    -Panel Registration, Member Registration (Registration Agreement, Registration Processing)

    -Providing Information: Past discussion and various information provided.

Information provision function

    -The factualized or supported value among all claims is classified into a database so that it can be informed and provided to all audiences.

     . Classification information-Classification (information or value), relevant discussion name, date, classification (politics, society, health, education, defense ...), originator classification (claimer, occupation classification), .....

     . Structure Information-Show the level of information. The subwindow that is the reason or source of the information is provided to the Subwindow screen when clicked.

     . Input of classification information-Define and input classification information.

    -Search function (logical search)

(2) screen processing

Considerations

    -Two things should be considered in the generation of this output.

    ▲ The size of a typical web screen cannot accommodate a lot of information on one screen.

▲ In the Phase II screen, the relationship between counter arguments and re-arguments (Chaining) and upper and lower distinctions (Indentation, Level & Position)

    -To solve this problem, the following special processing is performed.

Special handling for screen arrangement

    -Use Active X to accommodate as many objects as possible on the screen, develop a viewing tool separate from the web browser to use the full screen, and use the top and bottom scroll.

Screen size

    -The screen size is automatically calculated based on the number of registered objects.

    -According to the number of registered objects, the screen size expands infinitely by using left, right, up and down scroll.

Handling when there are many Object Arguments

    In the case of pros and cons, it is possible to determine the polarized stakeholder of the pros and cons clearly, but in the case of solution debate, there can be a multipolar dissent on a particular issue. However, if the counter party is different for a specific SA, which is a detailed issue, it will be a different dimension of objection. Therefore, the issue is considered different and the screen is processed as a separate issue.

Visualization Rule

    -The vertical hierarchy of each Argument is called Position, and the horizontal hierarchy is called Level.

    -Vertical Position determines hierarchy according to the order of Argument occurrence.

▲ position 1; Arg-n & Arg-nn

position 2; Arg-nn-n & Arg-nn-nn

    -The horizontal level means the number of steps from the top and is determined based on the following rules.

    ▲ All objections against Subject Arg-n and Object Arg-n are located at the same level, and objections against Object Argument and CounterArg-n are down one level.

    -All objections and objections are judged by the color of the representative caption and the chaining arrow is not used because the distinction of the objection (or objection) for a particular objection (or objection) is classified by position.

    Arg- (n + 1), the same position as Arg-n, does not appear at a higher level until counterArg for Arg-n exists.

(3) Argument Presentation

Argument object screen processing

    All Argument objects, such as SA and Counter Argument, display the information as shown in FIG. 34 as a presentation identification that can grasp various information and progress in addition to the opinion content included basically.

    ▲ claimant, target

    ▲ Opposition Information: Argument-id

    ▲ Decision: In case of the first SA

    -In order to overcome the limitation of the screen size, the representative word is displayed and the Argument text can be expanded to the subwindow by clicking on the keyword caption.

    -The opponent, the claimant and the claim period provide necessary information by pop-up menu by right clicking after selecting the object.

    -Argument information is classified by the background color of the Argument object (color is defined separately).

     . The counter status information indicates the existence of the counter object.

    -The decision report is only for the first SA and the verdict is indicated as follows.

     . In case of verdict, the color of background information is overwritten by classifying the background color according to appropriateness, nonconformity and reservation.

     . In the case of reservation, the counter information is displayed by painting the background color with white (background color).

    -The number of characters of Argument object is limited to maximum 25 characters x 2 line / 10 font in Korean standard so that Subject Argument and Counter Argument can be displayed together on one screen.

(4) Discussion workshop situation

    -The more controversial the arguments such as the number of arguments and objections, the repeated objections and recounts, and the recounters, the more opinions are crossed. How to display a structured screen structure to grasp such controversy at a glance is very important for inducing objective and rational discussion results in all discussions.

    -As the number of arguments increases, it is impossible to accommodate all of them on one screen. Therefore, the screen presentation is composed in two phases as follows.

     Phase I: The first Subject Arguments and their object Object Arguments are displayed as shown in FIG. 35 to understand the overall studio situation.

     Phase II: All Arguments such as objection, recount, and recount against a specific Subject Argument are displayed as shown in FIG. 35 so that the studio situation on a specific SA (detailed issue) can be known.

 In addition to the inquiry presentation, it provides an inquiry function that can inquire only all CAs for a specific argument.

(5) Type of main output

Discussion Status

    -Print out an overview of the various discussions going on on the site.

    ▲ Provides a list of discussions divided into three categories: On-going, Scheduled, and Past.

    ▲ Provides information on topics and subtopics, discussion start dates and periods, stakeholders and panels, and moderators for each discussion.

Discussion workshop situation

  -Screen to grasp detailed discussion (claim) and studio situation of each debate

  -It consists of two screens that show all the studio situations by the selected details and the screen that provides the status of the whole argument and argument.

Argument object screen processing

  -Technical specification of display output for Argument object that applies to all outputs.

(6) The visualization process of the discussion workshop will be described with reference to FIG. 36.

    -Subject Counter Argument to the left, Object Counter Argument to the right.

    -The vertical hierarchy of each Argument is called Position, and the horizontal hierarchy is called Level. The system calculates the level of Position and Level by analyzing all Arguments generated at the point of inquiry.

    -Vertical Position is a hierarchical order of rebellion, and Horizontal Level is a hierarchical order of occurrence of Argument. The following rules apply.

    ▲ Position

     . The specific Subject Counter Argument and Object CounterArg, which is the objection against it, are located at the same position, and the Subject CounterArg, which is the objection against the Object Counter Argument, is moved down one level.

     . When there are a plurality of CounterArgs for a specific Argument, these CounterArgs are located at the same position.

    ▲ Level

     . The later Argument cannot have priority over the Argument generated earlier.

     . If there are a plurality of CounterArgs for a specific Argument, the Level is down.

     . Subject CounterArg, which is an objection to all Object CounterArgs, is unconditionally leveled down.

    -All objections and recounts will be judged by the color of the caption of the representative word. Also, since the CounterArg for a specific Argument is clearly distinguished by position and level, the connecting arrow is not used.

The overall discussion and development method of the present invention is summarized as follows.

-In this system, it is assumed that all discussions are developed in a form in which one side first gives an opinion on a detailed matter and the other side refutes it.

    -At this time, the stakeholders and panel who first presented their opinions are called the Subject Party and the Subject panel, respectively. The initial opinions raised by the Subject panel and the subject panel's recount of the objection are called Subject Argument. On the contrary, the stakeholders and the panel who raised the objections against the subject argument are called the Object Party and the Object panel, respectively, and the object party's objection to the subject argument is called the Object Argument.

    -A stakeholder who first commented on the core issues of the whole discussion as in a policy discussion is called a Debate Subject Party for that discussion. The parties shall be referred to separately as the Argument Subject Party to the opinion.

Considerations ... Who will make the claim first?

    The following two factors should be considered in the development of the discussion.

     Who will first suggest? :

     Most discussions will be very sensitive to the stakeholder who will first comment.

     How effective is it to present the presentation to Audience?

     In order to make it easier for Audience to understand the progress of the discussion, the presentation should consider what kind of opinion is effective in showing the subject argument in the nature of the discussion topic.

    -Considering the above problem, the system changes the deployment method as shown in FIG. 39 according to the policy discussion and general discussion.

Subject Party Decision

    -All policy discussions, by their nature, become interested parties (ie, proponents) who wish to establish and implement (or assert) specific policies, measures, or measures, become debate subject parties throughout the discussion.

    -In general discussions, unlike policy discussions, the subject party of the whole discussion is not determined according to the nature of the controversy, but various and pluralistic discussion topics occur within the discussion. It can also be an object party.

    -The decision of the Subject Party according to the nature of the subtopic may be designated by the moderator, but may be deferred depending on the nature.

    -The Argument Subject Party may be designated by the moderator for each subtopic, and may be a Subject Party by arbitrarily presenting a comment during or during a discussion. However, if a Debate Subject Party is determined, such as in a policy debate or pros and cons, no other party can ever be a Subject Party in the debate.

    The Subject Panel may omit claims in each discussion topic, but the Subject Party shall register at least one claim in the discussion topic, and all Subject panels shall register one or more claims throughout the discussion.

Principles for presentation of discussion situations (see Visualization of discussion situations)

    -The presentation of the discussion on the development of the discussion has the following principles.

     . Subject Argument and Object Argument are displayed together on one screen.

     . Argument Position: Place all Subject Arguments on the left and all Object Arguments on the right.

     . Grouping by argument: Consider a presentation to identify individual SAs and their OAs as a group.

     . Chaining issues: Consider recognizing all connections in a debate workshop, such as a specific Argument, counter Argument, and recount.

Opinion structured break-down

 Opinion can be roughly divided into a specific Subject Argument and objection to it.

 -For the interactivity of the discussion, the system first breaks down all newly registered claims by detailed issues and breaks down as follows, and the arguments are presented on these items.

Feedback Break-down

- All new comments should be, arguments and evidence to support this assertion is divided into registration short and concise as each inductive way to deploy the specific claims again as shown in FIG. 40.

 -A claim is a representation or summary of a claim basis and is not the subject of a debate. A claim argument supporting the claim is the subject of a debate.

 -Argument basis should be composed of the main word (title) and the main text. If the content is short, the main text may be omitted and the main word may be composed only of the main word.

 There is no limit on the size (characters) of comments to be registered, but for interactive discussions that the system pursues at the core, it must be breakdown by argument, so it can never be long.

 -Long-term arguments should be accepted for those who have difficulty adapting to structured opinions, but the moderator will negotiate with the commenters and structure them and reflect them in the discussion.

 -Opinion registration is divided into the initial claim registration that is registered at the beginning of the discussion and the assertion that new or additional opinions are generated due to the exchange or sharing of many opinions and information during the discussion process.

Target

 -All arguments and allegations may be subject to attackers. Target designation is the designation of the counterpart who must argue against the claim.

 -If a target is set for an assertion, it is considered to have designated the same target for all claims grounds attached to that claim.

 -In the case of the pros and cons, the discussion between the pros and cons is obvious, so the designation of the target is omitted and the system automatically designates the target.

Structured Registration Editor

 -The registration of all claims and their arguments shall be registered in a break-down and structured format, as shown in Figure 37, by the program of this system to enable informatization and interactive discussion.

 -To this end, the system develops and supports a special editor with the following functions that can be used in off-line mode.

  . Function to structure opinions by individualizing claims and arguments by breaking down statements written by descriptive items

  . The editor consists of two types: the Viewer window and the Argument input window. Arguments entered in the Argument input window are displayed in the Viewer window.

. Additional explanation function (hereafter referred to as Reference-window ):

     Each opinion, such as a claim or grounds for a claim, provides a special function that allows you to enter additional explanatory material, such as commentary or concepts, on specific terms or phrases used as independent sub-objects, to prevent them from becoming long-term entities. The reference window may refer directly to certain other opinions when opposing the opinion.

  . When the input is completed, the input contents are saved in the inputter's PC and uploaded to the DB through the internet by the inputter's choice.

  . Modification of registered comments can be done in On-line mode.

  . The Editor handles the download automatically.

  Claims and Claims

Definition of terms

 Argument: All the details of a breakdown issue. (Claims, arguments, arguments, objections, inquiries, etc.)

 Claim Argument: The entity of the claim defined above is called the claim argument.

 -Argument Basis for Argument: The entity defined above is called Argument Argument.

 Claims: An Argument and its Argument Arguments may be referred to as an Argument.

 Subject Argument: The first assertion and alleged evidence presented by the Subject panel (hereinafter referred to as SA).

 -Object Argument: Any objection presented by the Object panel. (Hereinafter referred to as OA)

      Subject panel: The first panel to present an opinion.

      Object Panel: A panel that objected to the opinion of the Suject panel.

 Opinion: Argument can also be expressed as Opinion depending on the context.

Claim Registration

 There is no limit to the number of claims that can be placed on a single discussion topic.

 -Each claim can have more than one argument argument.

 -All claims will be disclosed upon registration. However, depending on the nature of the debate, it may be possible not to disclose all registered opinions to Audience and other interested parties until the time of submission of the opinions by prior agreement between the parties concerned (hereinafter referred to as "Argument").

 -The initial claim shall be registered within the time limit set by the discussion parties in advance, taking into account the time limit for discussion (see claim submitted).

Argument, Argument Basis Argument Object Structure

 Argument is a conclusive argument that summarizes all arguments and is not the subject of discussion. The concrete and detailed argument arguments supporting the argument are the subjects of debate. Therefore, the claim argument without claim argument should be rejected by the system.

 Claims and arguments Arguments have the same entity structure as in FIG.

 Argument consists only of representative words and has the following characteristics.

  . A summary of all the allegations, or texts, metaphorical claims, or promotional expressions, may be used.

 -Argument Basis Argument is composed of representative word and main text. The main text is displayed using Subwindow object.

Registration of Claims and Classification of Personality

 Claims are the least breakdown object that is the subject of debate.

 -Only the claim basis for the pre-registered claim may be additionally entered, and the claim basis for a new claim may be designated as a specific claim basis of another existing claim. For this purpose, the system provides a list of the evidence arguments available for selection.

 -If the argument basis is expressed at the same level of content as the discussion subtopic, the argument basis can be registered immediately without further argument in the discussion subtopic. In this case, the system creates and manages the dummy claims internally.

 -Even if the claim and the evidence ground are registered by break-down, the following matters should be considered in systemizing the proceeding of the discussion or the conclusion of the discussion.

     ① mutual correlation between claims; Hereinafter referred to as the "base structure".

        -Refer to the verdict on a claim as the correlation of the logical structure between the arguments.

     ② the nature of the arguments; Hereinafter referred to as "basal classification".

        -Factors that determine the verdict method by classification according to the nature of the content of each claim basis

 -All claim (s) must be applied to the above classification. If the case does not apply to the above classification, then this argument means that an interactive discussion is not possible, which is an irrational opinion or not appropriate as a basis for argument. In this case, the moderator shall negotiate with the relevant panel, and if not, the opinion shall be withdrawn.

Basis Structure:

    -Claims are divided into independent, dependent, and complex types depending on their structural characteristics.

    -The structuring of the registered Argument is carried out by the moderator, and the system refers to the verdict on the Subject Argument.

Basis of classification:

    -All claims grounds can be classified into three categories according to the nature of the claims.

      ① expresses specific information or facts; and

      ② When a definition of certain value, concept, norm, or specific logical argument is expressed

      ③ In case of presenting a specific proposal or policy as in the policy discussion

Type of Claim Basis Structure

 -A number of claims based on a particular claim can be divided into independent claims based on each other (independent) and dependent claims based on each other (dependent), or a combination of both, as shown in FIG. Can be divided. Complex types should be separated and generated as high as possible, independent and dependent.

 -The structure of this argument is not necessary at all in the case of panel and audience. The system defaults to standalone, and the moderator can modify it according to the comment screen. The assertion basis refers to the verdict of the final assertion and the system reflects it in the presentation of the assertion, as designated by the moderator.

Standalone

 -In standalone, each claim is independent of each other. Therefore, even if some of the arguments are false arguments, the rationale of the arguments may be affected, but the claims are not denied.

Dependent

 Dependent type refers to the argument basis of the deductive (or inductive) logical evolution type in which each claim basis is the basis of the final claim. Listed problems and established countermeasures can be said to be the most dependent type. Each Argument consists of a claim basis and a logical basis of this claim basis, so the subordinate type denies the claim basis and / or the assertion itself if some logic basis is denied.

 -The system should also regard the logical evidence as the claim evidence.

 -Depending on the capacity of the panel, it may occur that the subordinate-based structure is registered as a framework without separating it into logical and assertive grounds. In this case, the moderator may adjust the opinions arbitrarily registered, including in the case of the hybrid type. In particular, in the case of confusing discussions involving an unspecified majority, the moderator will have to adjust for most registered opinions.

 -The moderator shall designate a subordinate relationship for each subordinate assertion. In other words, all arguments that are direct logical grounds for the assertion must be clearly specified.

Types of Claim Basis Classification: Factors that determine the verdict method in case of verdict

Quantitative and non-quantitative claims

 -As can be seen in the example below, if the evidence is expressed quantitatively or if a specific category is specified, it is called quantitative claims and vice versa.

 -In general, a claim that expresses a particular fact or information is called a quantitative claim, and a claim that expresses a definition, value, or tone of a particular concept, requirement, norm, etc. will be a non-quantitative claim.

 -In this system, the plan is also regarded as a quantitative claim because it is a specific category.

 However, even if the nature of the arguments is quantitative, even if they are value or tone, they are regarded as factual claims, and non-quantitative facts are regarded as tone.

 -Although a claim is a fact (information), a non-quantitative claim can be considered as a logically flawed claim, but it can also be regarded as a quantitative claim if an implied or contextual quantitative expression can be omitted or estimated. have.

 Even if a factual claim is a non-quantitative claim, the opinion of the moderator's opinion screen cannot be dismissed and can only be rejected as a counter argument by another panel.

 The system assumes that all non-metered claims have assumptions to make a claim.

<Examples of Basis Classification>

  . If a nation's level of national consciousness is not high, it can never be argued that democracy is the best identity to run it.

  . Doctors should not refuse treatment, even if the patient can't afford it.

  . Koreans still consider industrial development to be more important than environment (non-quantitative, so tone): Only about 30% of our people put the environment first before industry.

  . The current level of ICT education cannot adequately educate the underprivileged. (Non-quantitative tone): How can the current underprivileged educate the underprivileged properly? There is a lack of specific explanations, so they are non-quantitative claims and arguments.

  . The level of consciousness of the Korean people recognizes that US troops withdraw from Korea pose a serious threat to the defense from North Korea (non-quantitative or quantitative). It can be interpreted that more than half of our people think so.

  . The purpose of the union's activities must be an organization that must be confined to private economic activities (non-quantitative values). It argues for a definition of the limits on union needs.

  . As of 2003, we are ahead of Japan in all areas of general information and telecommunications such as penetration rate, communication infrastructure environment, and information and communication technology, except for some information and communication parts. : It is quantitative and true because it defines the field ahead of Japan.

Judgment of suitability according to the nature of facts and information

 -If a particular Subject Argument (SA) is displaced to the extent that the opinions of the opposing parties are difficult to conceal, the method of determining suitability depends on the nature of the argument basis.

 -A factual SA is a fact-based claim, so it is impossible to deny the authenticity of the claim unless there is an objection or a clear basis for denying the fact.

 Therefore, if the arguments are true, even if the opinions of the opposing parties are displaced to the extent that it is difficult to conceal superiority, they cannot be justified by majority vote, unlike argument or value. However, since tone or value is a variable factor according to the times, cultural and social situations, it can be justified by a majority vote in case of dispute.

Claim Registration of Policy Discussion

 In the case of policy discussions, all initial SAs registered are classified as shown in FIG. In other words, the following requirements are included in the establishment requirements of the original SA:

 -The system recognizes and classifies these claims as subtopic information.

  ▲ Method of assertion (also called a plan): Specific plans to present (claim)

▲ Necessity suggestion: It refers to the necessity of the effect and the merits of the plan, or the current problem and the countermeasures (effect and merit). → adverse effects

▲ Probable Problems and Countermeasures: This refers to the contents and countermeasures related to (or expected to occur) problems that occur during the implementation of the plan. → alternative

     * The anticipated problem here is not the current problem that causes the necessity, but the additional problem that is expected to occur when implemented as claimed. For example, in the discussion of "Abolition of Australianism," the problems arising from the current Australian system imply the need for abolition, and the expected problem in the evidence requirements refers to the problems expected to arise from the abolition of the Australian system.

▲ Case presentation: A specific case supporting the evidence, including the case citation (country, person, organization / organization, etc.), content, effect, and reference. → History

  ▲ Other: Dummy or other content.

-Necessity claims and claims must be registered. (Hereinafter referred to as " claim requirement ")

If there is no necessity and claim method, the system notifies the moderator of the whole claim, and the moderator must screen the registered SA precisely to secure the requirements for establishing the claim.

 -All assertions shall specify the linkage with the item of necessity in which the plan emerged.

 -The necessity suggestion is the basis for the assertion, so if the debate and the necessity suggestion are denied, the assertion is denied.

 -The system automatically registers the claim basis for all case proposals as fact based on the claim classification for all propositions, and other necessities, expected problems and countermeasures are decided by the moderator according to the specific contents. .

 Anticipated problems and countermeasures may be raised by the claimant, present alternatives, or raised by the objector.

Conclusion on this system

 -This system has the following characteristics in the way of operation unlike the existing discussion.

  ① All opinions are broken down by detailed issues.

  ② It is possible to develop an argument clearly by conducting interactive discussions according to certain discussion rules.

  ③ All bad opinions are filtered out by the moderator and only meaningful and sound opinions are collected.

 -This feature can be concluded that the absence of objection to a particular opinion by a certain time means that the opinion is correct.

 Therefore, the system performs the following discussion conclusion processing with reference to the discussion progress result.

  ▲ Verdict on Subject Argument:

     Considering the characteristics of SA and CA based on the results of the debate workshop on all SAs, the system attempts to draw conclusions by automatically processing evaluations such as conformity and nonconformity.

  ▲ Verdict on the whole discussion:

     For all claims, subtopics, or discussions as a whole, the moderator conducts the verdict in consideration of the verdict for SA and discloses it to Audience, stating that the appropriate arguments are a problem and a prerequisite to the conclusion of the discussion.

44 is a structure diagram of Document Identification Notation according to the present invention.

-Various description materials and specifications used in all documents in this specification shall use identification notation having the following structure in common.

▲ Subjects: Operator, Moderator, Stakeholders, Panel, Audience, System, Common

▲ Data type: Specification and rule explanation data, process (process flow), data structure data

▲ Serial No. 1: Serial No. by Data Type

▲ Serial No. 2: subdivision number of specific data type

On the other hand, the embodiment of the present invention has a charging step of paying or paying a certain amount at the time of joining or discussing a discussion party, and a security authentication step of confirming that the discussion party is a general public. As a technology, detailed descriptions are omitted.

In addition, the general known techniques that do not correspond to the gist of the present invention have been omitted.

What has been described above is only one embodiment for implementing the Internet-based discussion system and method thereof according to the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and the present invention is within the spirit of the present invention. Of course, various modifications are possible by one of ordinary skill in the art.

As described above, according to the discussion system and method based on the Internet according to the present invention, the opinions and arguments of the various layers are structured according to personality, and the issues are emphasized. By drawing conclusions through an issue workshop, we can draw scientific and rational conclusions through cycles of consensus, understanding, and derivation, and never seek the conclusion of a complete discussion, but seek the best direction and the best direction. Also, by revealing certain processes based on collected information and values, it is possible to draw conclusions that contain certain vitality and limitations, not absolute conclusions.

In addition, the present invention enables the construction of powerful journalism to enable new substantial social reforms, creating new political mechanisms, and providing innovative models that are nowhere else in the world. It also has the effect of being able to cultivate general public consciousness that is led and biased.

In addition, the discussion system of the present invention can be utilized in the following ranges.

▲ Public debate on social issues.

▲ Internal preliminary evaluation system for business plans, policies and implementation plans within a specific group.

▲ Public hearings on various laws and regulations of government agencies.

▲ Open consultation to find solutions and solutions to various problems of companies and groups.

▲ Decision-making system on management issues of other companies and public organizations.

1 is a diagram summarizing the problems of the existing discussion,

2 is an overall configuration diagram of a discussion system based on the Internet of the present invention;

3 is an overall configuration diagram of an information table applied to the present invention;

4 is a detailed structural diagram of an information table applied to the present invention;

5 is a registration generation diagram of the discussion body information DB according to the present invention,

6 is an overall flowchart illustrating a discussion procedure according to the present invention;

7 is a log-in and menu activation process according to the present invention;

8 is a menu configuration diagram according to the discussion body according to the present invention,

9 is a registration generation diagram of the member information DB according to the present invention;

10 is an operation process diagram of the operator mode according to the present invention;

11 is a discussion operation information (host mode) registration process according to the present invention,

12 is a process for registering discussion body information according to the present invention;

Figure 13 is a discussion topic topic registration process according to the present invention,

14 is a prior information registration process according to the present invention,

15 is an opinion screen processing process according to the present invention;

16 is a support request review process according to the present invention,

17 is a process for judicial verdict processing according to the present invention;

18 is a process for registering a request for support according to the present invention;

19 is a claim registration process according to the present invention,

20 is an objection registration process diagram according to the present invention;

21 is a support request processing procedure according to the present invention,

22 is a reply acceptance processing procedure diagram according to the present invention;

23 is a support request reply process according to the present invention.

24 is a discussion studio closing process according to the present invention,

25 is a SA verdict processing process according to the present invention,

26 is a discussion Closing processing procedure according to the present invention,

Figure 27 is a SA alleviation verdict processing process according to the present invention,

28 is a claim verdict processing process according to the present invention;

29 is a process for processing a subtopic and a discussion verdict according to the present invention

30 is a view for generating a Subject Argument verdict rule according to the present invention;

31 is a diagram illustrating a verdict Portfolio according to the Verdict Factor according to the present invention;

32 is an overall process chart according to the present invention;

33 is an overall structural diagram of a discussion system based on the Internet of the present invention;

34 is a view showing the configuration of the Argument object according to the present invention;

35 is a view showing the configuration of the studio situation of the whole discussion according to the present invention,

36 is a process view screen processing process of the studio situation for one SA according to the present invention,

37 is a screen configuration diagram of an Editor (for opinion structured registration) according to the present invention;

38 is a classification diagram of discussion information according to the present invention;

39 is a discussion development method according to the present invention;

40 is a schematic diagram of opinion structure according to the present invention;

41 is a claim based structure diagram according to the present invention;

42 is a registration diagram of the policy discussion according to the present invention;

43 is a linkage diagram of objection according to the present invention;

44 is a structure diagram of Document Identification Notation according to the present invention.

 Explanation of symbols on main parts of drawing

100: discussion management server 200: panel client terminal

300: Audience client terminal 400: Web server

500: information table 510: reference information DB

520: Member information DB 530: Discussion information DB

540: Argument Information DB 550: Discussion Body Information DB

560: log information DB

Claims (40)

In the Internet-based discussion system that supports decision making through internet discussion, Panels connected through the Internet conduct interactive opinion workshops on the specific issues of the discussion subjects according to predetermined rules for each discussion type. It includes a discussion management server that registers and manages the information of all the parties involved, including discussion information, discussion workshop information, and discussion result derivation information in a database. The discussion management server is connected to a plurality of panel client terminals via the Internet, Participate in polls to gather public opinions, present free opinions on the situation of discussion workshops that are handled according to the discussion workshops of multiple panels, and inquire about panel opinions or participate in discussion workshops by requesting support from the panels. An internet based discussion system characterized in that it is connected to an Audience client terminal. The method of claim 1, The discussion management server, A reference information DB for registering reference information for various classifications related to the discussion; A member information DB for registering basic information about all members; A discussion information DB for storing information about each discussion object, such as discussion classification and classification, discussion progress rules, and progress, which define the characteristics of the discussion, including information on the name and subtopic of the discussion; An Argument Information DB that registers Argument information such as all arguments, arguments, and queries generated during the discussion; And A discussion body information DB for registering the discussion information of each participant extracted from the member information DB; Internet-based discussion system, characterized in that it comprises a. The method of claim 2, The member information DB includes stakeholder information for a specific organization or group; An Internet-based discussion system that includes personal member information about individuals such as moderators, panels, and audiences. The method of claim 2, The discussion information DB includes discussion basic information for classifying each discussion; Various discussion type classification information of the discussion; Discussion rule information that sets the general rules of operation of the discussion; Discussion progress information to grasp the progress of the discussion; The Internet-based discussion system, which includes discussion topic information classified by discussion topics. The method of claim 2, The Argument information includes a variety of Argument information including discussion dictionary information and all claims, objections, and queries generated during the discussion process; Additional information such as various flat decision reports and exit information; Internet-based discussion system comprising advance information (543) and exit opinion information (544). The method of claim 2, The discussion body information DB includes essential registration information of interested parties, panels, and moderators; An Internet-based discussion system, which optionally includes Audience information that limits viewing or participation in the discussion. The method according to claim 2 or 6, The discussion body information DB is a discussion system based on the Internet, characterized in that the operator, moderator or interested parties, such as extracted from the member information DB to register when the discussion is confirmed. delete In the discussion method based on the Internet, which draws conclusions by summarizing the discussions of the discussion participants connected through the Internet, Automatically connecting the terminal to a discussion management server according to a connection request of the discussion party, and sending a menu screen for each discussion body to the terminal; Determining whether one of an operator, a moderator, a stakeholder, a panel, and an audience is selected on a menu screen for each discussion body sent to the terminal; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 9, If the moderator is selected in the judging step, sending a moderator menu screen of discussion body registration, discussion operation information registration, discussion topic registration, dictionary information registration, opinion screen, support request review, and moderator verdict; Transmitting the discussion information registration screen to the terminal when the discussion operation information registration is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Registering the discussion information and discussion operation information of the discussion field on the discussion information registration screen sent to the terminal and registering it in the discussion information DB; And Determining whether the discussion section registered in the discussion information database is a main discussion, and if the discussion is a main discussion, inputting discussion classification information and discussion rule information to register in the discussion information database; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that further comprises a. The method of claim 10, A discussion type determination step of determining whether the discussion type registered in the discussion information DB is a panel discussion when the discussion body registration is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Transmitting a discussion body information registration screen to a terminal if the discussion type is a panel discussion in the discussion type determination step; Registering the discussion body information of the interested party and the panel on the discussion body information registration screen sent to the terminal to register in the discussion body information DB; Determining whether the discussion type is a non-panel discussion or a local discussion in the discussion type determination step; And If the discussion type is a secret discussion or a local discussion, inputting a designated Audience in the discussion body information registration screen and registering in the discussion body information DB; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 10, A discussion division judging step of determining whether a discussion section registered in the discussion information DB is a policy discussion when a discussion topic topic registration is selected on a moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Sending a subtopic information registration screen to the terminal if the discussion section is not a policy discussion in the discussion section determination step; Registering, by the moderator, subtopic information and a subject party for each subtopic on the subtopic information registration screen sent to the terminal, to register in the discussion information DB; Designating a subject party for each subtopic and counting a submission time limit from a designated date and registering the subject party in a discussion information DB; And Notifying by e-mail while announcing a discussion start processing guideline registered in the discussion information DB; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 10, A discussion division judging step of determining whether the discussion section registered in the discussion information DB is a pre-discussion when the preliminary information registration is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Transmitting a pre-information registration screen to the terminal if the discussion is not a prior discussion in the discussion division determination step; And Registering dictionary information for each subtopic in Argument Information DB by inputting dictionary information on the dictionary information registration screen sent to the terminal; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 10, If the opinion screen is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal, generating a opinion screen target list and transmitting the opinion screen processing screen to the terminal; An unprocessed judging step of judging whether there is an unprocessed item by selecting whether to leave the item and the opinion classification code for each target opinion item on the opinion screen processing screen sent to the terminal; An exit judgment step of judging whether there is a withdrawal of opinions if there is no unprocessed item in the unprocessed decision step; Registering the exit record in the discussion body information DB and registering the exit content and the exit reason code in the Argument information DB, if there is an opinion withdrawal in the exit judgment step; Registering an opinion classification code in an Argument Information DB and counting a time limit for opposition if there is no withdrawal in the exit judgment step; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 10, Transmitting a discussion studio situation screen to the terminal when the support request review is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Determining whether the request has been canceled by reviewing the request on the discussion studio situation screen sent to the terminal; And If there is a cancellation in the step, selecting a forced deadline and registering it in the Argument information DB, and notifying it by e-mail; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 10, A discussion classification judging step of determining whether a discussion section registered in the discussion information DB is a policy discussion when a moderator verdict is selected on the moderator menu screen sent to the terminal; Transmitting a claim basis verdict status screen to the terminal when the discussion classification is not a policy discussion in the discussion classification determination step; If the main argument basis is selected by the moderator on the screen of the assertion basis verdict sent to the terminal, the system verifies the claim according to the suitability, inadequate, reservation or conditional conformity of the main claim basis and registers the verdict result in the Argument Information DB. Steps; Registering the verdict result in the Argument Information DB by checking the necessity, a solution, a problem, and a countermeasure by checking the necessity, a solution, a problem, and a countermeasure if the discussion is a policy discussion in the discussion classification step; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 14, If there is an unprocessed item in the unprocessed determination step, the method based on the Internet, characterized in that for transmitting a reprocessing request message to the terminal screen. The method of claim 9, Transmitting a discussion body information registration screen to a terminal when a stakeholder is selected in the determining step; Registering a delegation panel in the discussion body information DB sent from the discussion body information registration screen sent to the terminal; Transmitting the request text creation screen to the terminal when the delegation panel is registered; And Creating a request message in the request message creation screen sent to the terminal and registering the request message in an Argument information DB; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that further comprises a. The method of claim 9, Transmitting a panel menu screen for claim registration, counter registration, support request, and reply acceptance to the terminal when the panel is selected in the determining step; Determining whether an editor is installed when claim registration is selected on a panel menu screen sent to the terminal; Automatically downloading the Editor if the Editor is not installed, and executing the Editor to send the Editor screen to the terminal if the Editor is installed; And Inputting a comment in the Editor screen sent to the terminal to register in the Argument Information DB, and automatically notifying the debating party and related Audience that the new comment has been registered in the Argument Information DB through an E-mail; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 19, A special Editor function step of breaking down a plurality of arguments supporting arguments and supporting arguments on the Editor screen (by Argument) in order to register an opinion in the Argument Information DB, and inputting them by structuring them; And Inputting in a pre-formatted manner classified as claim plans, necessities (problems), anticipated problems and countermeasures, case presentations, etc. when the opinion is registered in a policy discussion through the Editor; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that further comprises a. The method of claim 19, Transmitting a discussion studio status screen to the terminal when a counter registration is selected on the panel menu screen sent to the terminal; Transmitting an objection input screen to the terminal when an argument object to be objected is designated in the discussion studio situation screen transmitted to the terminal; And Inputting an objection on the objection input screen sent to the terminal to register the objection in the Argument information DB and automatically notifying that the new opinion has been registered in the Argument information DB; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 19, A discussion type determination step of determining whether a general or panel discussion is made by checking a discussion type registered in the discussion information DB when a support request is selected from a panel menu screen sent to the terminal; Determining whether the number of support requests of the stakeholder information accumulated in the discussion body information DB exceeds the number of support requests allowed in the discussion rule when the discussion type is general and panel discussion in the discussion type determination step; Transmitting the discussion studio situation screen to the terminal if the allowable number of times is not exceeded in the step; and transmitting an error message to the terminal screen if the number of times is exceeded. Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 19, Transmitting a discussion studio situation screen to the terminal when the reply reception is selected on the panel menu screen sent to the terminal; Determining whether or not the support requester accepts the reply in the discussion studio situation screen sent to the terminal, notifying the replyer by e-mail, deleting the registered reply, and modifying the corresponding Argument information DB if not accepted; Registering the reply time limit in the Argument information DB while publicly registering the reply if the acceptance is in the step; Determining whether a support request is closed by sending a deadline inquiry screen to a terminal when a time limit for counterattack is registered in the Argument information DB; Determining whether the deadline has been exceeded by checking a deadline if the support request deadline is not at the step; And Deleting the support request and registering it in an Argument information DB if the deadline is exceeded or the support request is closed; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 9, If the audience is selected in the judging step, transmitting an audience menu screen of the objection, free opinion, and support request response to the terminal; Transmitting a discussion studio situation screen to the terminal when the support request reply is selected on the Audience menu screen sent to the terminal; Registering an arbitrary panel by selecting an Argument to be returned from the discussion studio situation screen sent to the terminal; If the arbitrary panel is registered, sending a reply input screen to the terminal to process the input in a private manner and then registering it in an Argument information DB; And Processing the opinion screen after notifying the input processing result registered in the Argument Information DB by E-mail; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that further comprises a. The method according to any one of claims 9 to 24, The method further includes a discussion result derivation step of processing a verdict with a subject argument (SA), a claim, a subtopic, a suitability for the whole discussion, a conditional conformity, an inadequacy, a reservation, etc. Internet based discussion method. The method of claim 25, The discussion result derivation step, A debate workshop process for superior treatment of the studio results for the abandoned SA; An SA evaluation result of the system verdict processing of the SA processed by the result of the workshop in the discussion studio process with conformity, conditional conformity, nonconformity, reservation, etc .; A discussion Closing process that closes the discussion at the end of the discussion period and notifies the end of discussion message by e-mail; Confrontation findings for processing studio results for confronting SAs; And Claim verdict result which checks SA verdict processed by each claim and handles verdict according to verdict principle of claim; And A deliberation result that verifies the subtopic and the discussion as a whole based on each claim; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. The method of claim 26, The discussion workshop process, Checking the time limit for the counterattest for all SAs registered in the discussion information DB to determine whether the time limit for the counterattack has been exceeded; Determining whether the OA has given up the objection if the time limit for the objection is exceeded; And Predominantly processing the SA when the OA abandons the counter-argument; performing a predecessor processing of the SA when the OA does not abandon the counter-argument; Internet-based discussion method comprising a. The method of claim 26, The SA verdict process, Checking the discussion studio information on the claim basis registered in the Argument Information DB to determine whether the discussion workshop has ended; Checking the SA and OA personality classification when the discussion workshop is finished, processing verdicts of conformity, conditional conformity, nonconformity, and verdict reservation according to the Argument verdict rule and registering the result in the Argument information DB; And Judging whether or not the assertion basis, that is, the assertion basis structure, among the assertion basis registered in the Argument information DB is dependent type, and if the dependent type is dependent, verdicting the same as the Argument subordinate to the dependent Argument; Internet-based discussion method comprising a. The method of claim 26, The discussion Closing process, Checking a discussion period registered in the discussion information DB to determine whether the discussion period has ended; When the discussion period ends, closing the discussion and calculating a real discussion period and registering it in the discussion information DB; And Notifying the end of the discussion notice by e-mail; Internet-based discussion method comprising a. The method of claim 26, The conflicting result determination is, Checking whether a new CA is registered by checking a CA registered in the Argument Information DB; Determining whether a real discussion period registered in the discussion information database has elapsed if a new CA is not registered in the argument information DB; And Finally processing an unprocessed discussion studio and SA verdict in the studio when the real discussion period has passed; Internet-based discussion method comprising a. The method of claim 26, The claim evaluation results above, The system checks the SA judgment report by the claim by the moderator's instruction to perform the claim verdict, and the system automatically performs the claim verdict when all SA verdicts are equally verdicted as suitable or non-conforming or conditional or reserved. Based discussion method. The method of claim 31, wherein Generating a SA verdict summary table summarizing the verdicts of all the SAs registered in the discussion information DB when the verdict verdict is finished, and transmitting a discussion verdict processing screen to the terminal; Checking the discussion verdict Type and inputting a subtopic verdict if the verdict Type = 1 to register the subtopic verdict in the discussion information DB; If the verdict Type = 1 is not transmitted, sending a subtopic verdict writing screen to the terminal; And Creating a subtopic verdict on the subtopic verdict writing screen sent to the terminal and registering the subtopic verdict on the discussion information DB; Internet-based discussion method comprising a. The method of claim 32, Sending a discussion verdict writing screen to the terminal when the subjudgment verdict is completed in the subjudgment verdicting step; Creating a discussion verdict on the discussion verdict writing screen sent to the terminal and registering the discussion verdict in the discussion information DB; Determining whether the verdict verdict registered in the discussion information DB is verdict Type = 1; And If the verdict Type = 1, inputting a total discussion verdict and registering the verdict verdict in the discussion information DB; Internet-based discussion method comprising a. The method according to any one of claims 14 to 24 or any one of claims 26 to 33, The discussion method based on the Internet, characterized in that it further comprises a discussion workshop status display step of displaying the discussion studio of the objection, re-argument on the screen for each subject argument. The method of claim 34, In the discussion workshop situation display step, the subject counter arguments and object arguments generated during the workshop process are grouped by panel and the screen output position of each argument is calculated regardless of the number of generated arguments. Internet-based discussion method characterized in that it has an output function that automatically adjusts the screen size. In the discussion method based on the Internet, which draws conclusions by summarizing the discussions of the discussion participants connected through the Internet, A discussion decision process (S110) for determining a topic of discussion, a moderator, a stakeholder, and an audience; Discussion period decision-making process (S120) for deciding discussion period, discussion rules, discussion panel for each stakeholder; A discussion party registration process (S130) in which an operator of the discussion management server first registers a moderator to conduct a discussion, and registers the remaining discussion parties in which the registered moderator directly participates in the discussion; Discussion operation information registration process (S140) for registering the discussion basics, discussion personality classification and dictionary information; A discussion preparation step (S100) including a subtopic registration process (S150) for registering a subtopic of discussion, and determining and registering an opinion promoter for each subtopic; A discussion initiation process (S210) for registering and guiding message announcements on a site on-going discussion list and a discussion start guide e-mail; Subject Argument (SA) registration, New opinion registration guide Subject Argument registration process (S220) for automatically notifying e-mail to the discussion parties; Subject Argument (SA) personality classification registration and feedback screen e-mail notification to reject bad feedback (S230) and; A discussion studio step (S200) including a counter registration for SA and a counter registration registration process (S240) for automatically notifying a counterpart registration guide discussion e-mail; Debating studio result processing process (S310) for the superior processing of the studio results for the abandoned SA; Debate verdict step (S300) including a SA verdict (S320) to verify the system, such as fit, condition fit, non-suit, reservation, etc. for the processed SA results; And Closing process at the end of the discussion period, the discussion Closing process (S410) to notify the end of the discussion notice e-mail; An on-going studio opposition treatment and a studio termination treatment process of opposing studio SA verdict processing (S420); Debate conclusion step (S400), including a claim system verdict, a subtopic verdict, a debate verdict processing process (S430) to handle the entire verdict of the debate; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that configured to include. In the discussion method based on the Internet, which draws conclusions by summarizing the discussions of the discussion participants connected through the Internet, Derivative discussion stage where professional knowledge is needed during the debate process or a specific minority group can discuss the main discussion separately from the main discussion; Counter-discussion stages in which discussions are attempted by changing positions on specific issues; Internet-based discussion method characterized in that it comprises a sub-discussion subordinate to the main discussion. In the discussion method based on the Internet, which draws conclusions by summarizing the discussions of the discussion participants connected through the Internet, Automatically connecting the terminal to a discussion management server according to a connection request of the discussion party, and sending a menu screen for each discussion body to the terminal; Determining whether an operator is selected from an operator, a moderator, a stakeholder, a panel, and an audience on a menu screen for each discussion body sent to the terminal; Transmitting a discussion information registration screen to a terminal when an operator is selected in the menu screen for each discussion body; Registering basic information, such as a discussion period and a discussion name, on the discussion information registration screen sent to the terminal to register in the discussion information DB; Transmitting the discussion body information registration screen to a terminal when the discussion basic information is registered; And Designating a moderator on the discussion body information registration screen sent to the terminal to register in the discussion body information DB; Recording medium recording the discussion method based on the Internet, including a. In the discussion method based on the Internet, which draws conclusions by summarizing the discussions of the discussion participants connected through the Internet,  A discussion decision process (S110) for determining a topic of discussion, a moderator, a stakeholder, and an audience; Discussion period decision-making process (S120) for deciding discussion period, discussion rules, discussion panel for each stakeholder; A discussion party registration process (S130) in which an operator of the discussion management server first registers a moderator to conduct a discussion, and registers the remaining discussion parties in which the registered moderator directly participates in the discussion; Discussion operation information registration process (S140) for registering the discussion basics, discussion personality classification and dictionary information; A discussion preparation step (S100) including a subtopic registration process (S150) for registering a subtopic of discussion, and determining and registering an opinion promoter for each subtopic; A discussion initiation process (S210) for registering and guiding message announcements on a site on-going discussion list and a discussion start guide e-mail; Subject Argument (SA) registration, New opinion registration guide Subject Argument registration process (S220) for automatically notifying e-mail to the discussion parties; Subject Argument (SA) personality classification registration and feedback screen e-mail notification to reject bad feedback (S230) and; A discussion studio step (S200) including a counter registration for SA and a counter registration registration process (S240) for automatically notifying a counterpart registration guide discussion e-mail; Debating studio result processing process (S310) for the superior processing of the studio results for the abandoned SA; Debate verdict step (S300) including a SA verdict (S320) to verify the system, such as fit, condition fit, non-suit, reservation, etc. for the processed SA results; And Closing process at the end of the discussion period, the discussion Closing process (S410) to notify the end of the discussion notice e-mail; An on-going studio opposition treatment and a studio termination treatment process of opposing studio SA verdict processing (S420); Debate conclusion step (S400), including a claim system verdict, a subtopic verdict, a debate verdict processing process (S430) to handle the entire verdict of the debate; Recording medium recording the discussion method based on the Internet, including a. The method of claim 9, Transmitting a discussion information registration screen to a terminal when an operator is selected in the determining step; Registering basic information, such as a discussion period and a discussion name, on the discussion information registration screen sent to the terminal to register in the discussion information DB; Transmitting the discussion body information registration screen to a terminal when the discussion basic information is registered; And Designating a moderator on the discussion body information registration screen sent to the terminal to register in the discussion body information DB; Internet-based discussion method, characterized in that further comprises a.