JPWO2021202870A5 - - Google Patents

Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JPWO2021202870A5
JPWO2021202870A5 JP2022559972A JP2022559972A JPWO2021202870A5 JP WO2021202870 A5 JPWO2021202870 A5 JP WO2021202870A5 JP 2022559972 A JP2022559972 A JP 2022559972A JP 2022559972 A JP2022559972 A JP 2022559972A JP WO2021202870 A5 JPWO2021202870 A5 JP WO2021202870A5
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
user
software build
stimulus input
activity data
computing device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2022559972A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2023520791A (en
Publication date
Priority claimed from US17/117,050 external-priority patent/US11960383B2/en
Application filed filed Critical
Publication of JP2023520791A publication Critical patent/JP2023520791A/en
Publication of JPWO2021202870A5 publication Critical patent/JPWO2021202870A5/ja
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Claims (1)

ユーザーコンピューティング装置を用いてグラフィカルユーザーインタフェースを介して、ソフトウェアビルドのインスタンスをユーザーに提示することであって、前記ソフトウェアビルドは、1つ以上のコンピュータ制御刺激または相互作用に応答して予期された刺激入力パターンを前記ユーザーから引き出すように構成された前記1つ以上のコンピュータ制御刺激または相互作用を含む少なくとも1つの特徴を含むことと、
前記ユーザーコンピューティング装置と通信可能に係合された少なくとも1つのセンサーを用いて、前記ソフトウェアビルドの前記インスタンス内で前記1つ以上のコンピュータ制御刺激または相互作用の提示に応答して複数のユーザー入力を受信することであって、前記複数のユーザー入力は、前記ソフトウェアビルドのセッションに対するユーザー活動データを含むことと、
前記ユーザーコンピューティング装置と通信可能に係合されたプロセッサを用いて、前記ユーザー活動データを受信することと、
前記プロセッサを用いて、前記ユーザー活動データを少なくとも1つのデータモデルに従って処理して、前記複数のユーザー入力内の各ユーザー入力に対する1つ以上の実際の刺激入力パターンを判断することと、
前記複数のユーザー入力内の各ユーザー入力に対する前記1つ以上の実際の刺激入力パターンを、前記少なくとも1つの特徴に対する前記予期された刺激入力パターンと比較して、前記1つ以上の実際の刺激入力パターンが、前記ソフトウェアビルドの前記セッション内の前記予期された刺激入力パターンを反映していたインスタンスの総数を決定することと、
前記プロセッサを用いて、前記ユーザー活動データに対する少なくとも1つの出力値を前記少なくとも1つのデータモデルに従って計算することであって、前記少なくとも1つの出力値は、前記少なくとも1つの特徴に適したモデルの定性的または定量的程度を含むことと、
前記ソフトウェアビルドに対する合格/不合格状態を前記少なくとも1つの出力値に従って判断することと
を含む、ソフトウェア品質保証のための方法。
presenting an instance of a software build to a user via a graphical user interface using a user computing device, the software build including at least one feature including one or more computer-controlled stimuli or interactions configured to elicit an expected stimulus input pattern from the user in response to the one or more computer-controlled stimuli or interactions;
receiving, with at least one sensor communicatively engaged with the user computing device, a plurality of user inputs in response to the presentation of the one or more computer-controlled stimuli or interactions within the instance of the software build, the plurality of user inputs including user activity data for a session of the software build;
receiving, with a processor communicatively coupled to the user computing device, the user activity data;
processing, with the processor, the user activity data in accordance with at least one data model to determine one or more actual stimulus input patterns for each user input in the plurality of user inputs;
comparing the one or more actual stimulus input patterns for each user input in the plurality of user inputs to the expected stimulus input pattern for the at least one feature to determine a total number of instances in which the one or more actual stimulus input patterns reflected the expected stimulus input pattern within the session of the software build;
calculating, with the processor, at least one output value for the user activity data in accordance with the at least one data model, the at least one output value including a qualitative or quantitative measure of model fit to the at least one feature;
determining a pass/fail status for the software build according to the at least one output value.
JP2022559972A 2020-04-01 2021-04-01 Systems and methods for software design control and quality assurance Pending JP2023520791A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202063003673P 2020-04-01 2020-04-01
US63/003,673 2020-04-01
US17/117,050 2020-12-09
US17/117,050 US11960383B2 (en) 2020-04-01 2020-12-09 Systems and methods for software design control and quality assurance
PCT/US2021/025377 WO2021202870A1 (en) 2020-04-01 2021-04-01 Systems and methods for software design control and quality assurance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2023520791A JP2023520791A (en) 2023-05-19
JPWO2021202870A5 true JPWO2021202870A5 (en) 2024-04-11

Family

ID=77922135

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2022559972A Pending JP2023520791A (en) 2020-04-01 2021-04-01 Systems and methods for software design control and quality assurance

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US11960383B2 (en)
EP (1) EP4127919A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2023520791A (en)
KR (1) KR20220154830A (en)
CN (1) CN115769190A (en)
AU (1) AU2021247182A1 (en)
CA (1) CA3173240A1 (en)
TW (1) TWI812935B (en)
WO (1) WO2021202870A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11929163B1 (en) * 2020-10-16 2024-03-12 Express Scripts Strategic Development, Inc. Automated device efficacy determination systems for health monitoring devices
WO2023068817A1 (en) * 2021-10-19 2023-04-27 (주)클로버추얼패션 Method and device for testing rendering results
CN113722239B (en) * 2021-11-01 2022-01-25 南昌航空大学 Airborne embedded software quality detection method, device, medium and electronic equipment

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6652457B1 (en) 1999-09-27 2003-11-25 Gary L. Skiba Stimulus-response conditioning process
US20020147620A1 (en) 2001-01-31 2002-10-10 Walsh Thomas J. Software quality assurance management system
US20030009740A1 (en) 2001-06-11 2003-01-09 Esoftbank (Beijing) Software Systems Co., Ltd. Dual & parallel software development model
US7299451B2 (en) 2002-01-24 2007-11-20 International Business Machines Corporation Remotely driven system for multi-product and multi-platform testing
DE102006046203A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2007-08-30 Siemens Ag Software source code evaluating method, involves classifying detected errors, assigning errors to error class from set of error classes, and assigning specification, which specifies errors of respective error classes to each error class
US8286143B2 (en) * 2007-11-13 2012-10-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for monitoring code change impact on software performance
US8086280B2 (en) * 2008-06-16 2011-12-27 Rivada Networks Llc Explosion proof communications relay and communications system
US9111030B1 (en) 2008-10-03 2015-08-18 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Systems and methods for testing a software application
US9021441B2 (en) 2009-03-30 2015-04-28 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Methods and systems of determining a quality level of a software instance
TWM496157U (en) 2009-10-28 2015-02-21 ming-yun Li Monitoring system of multi-configuration information collection and performance detection evaluation
JP5626786B2 (en) 2010-11-09 2014-11-19 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation Software development support method, software development support device, and software development support program
DE112012006377B4 (en) 2012-05-17 2022-02-24 Intel Corporation Control energy consumption and performance of computer systems
US9459994B2 (en) * 2013-02-20 2016-10-04 Kony, Inc. Mobile application testing systems and methods
US20150164377A1 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-06-18 Vaidhi Nathan System and method of body motion analytics recognition and alerting
US9483393B1 (en) 2013-12-05 2016-11-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Discovering optimized experience configurations for a software application
US10817530B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2020-10-27 C3.Ai, Inc. Systems, methods, and devices for an enterprise internet-of-things application development platform
EP3291875B1 (en) * 2015-05-04 2023-01-04 Phoenix NeuroStim Therapeutics, LLC Modulation of brainwave activity using non-invasive stimulation of sensory pathways
US9558098B1 (en) 2016-03-02 2017-01-31 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method, apparatus, and non-transitory computer readable media for the assessment of software products
KR20190027354A (en) * 2016-04-08 2019-03-14 비짜리오 인코포레이티드 Method and system for acquiring, analyzing and generating vision performance data and modifying media based on vision performance data
US20180113802A1 (en) * 2016-10-21 2018-04-26 Sivakumar Yeddnapuddi Application simulator for a vehicle
EP3531915A4 (en) * 2016-10-24 2020-04-22 Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. Cognitive platform configured as a biomarker or other type of marker
US11201937B2 (en) * 2018-11-22 2021-12-14 Jeffrey Alan Carley Message broker customization with user administered policy functions

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Peck et al. Avatar embodiment. a standardized questionnaire
JP6206791B2 (en) Concentration measuring device, program
Akachi et al. Effect of investment in malaria control on child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa in 2002–2008
US20150279226A1 (en) Adaptive cognitive skills assessment and training
JP2019528812A5 (en)
US9324241B2 (en) Predictive executive functioning models using interactive tangible-graphical interface devices
JP2016099992A (en) Intracompany currency system
Sziladi et al. The analysis of hand gesture based cursor position control during solve an IT related task
Park et al. AxGames: Towards crowdsourcing quality target determination in approximate computing
TWI812935B (en) Systems and methods for software design control and quality assurance
US20200114115A1 (en) Cognitive platform for deriving effort metric for optimizing cognitive treatment
US8260648B2 (en) Process scheduling optimization method
JPWO2021202870A5 (en)
Almeida et al. Performance metrics in scrum software engineering companies
Silvia et al. Reward-seeking deficits in major depression: Unpacking appetitive task performance with ex-Gaussian response time variability analysis.
Khan et al. Impact of continuous improvement on organization performance insight from Pakistan: an empirical study
Rummel Probability Plotting: A Tool for Analyzing Task Completion Times.
Tang et al. Parallel architecture and optimization for discrete-event simulation of spike neural networks
JP3787149B1 (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating true effect of intervention
JP2021509198A5 (en)
US20220398477A1 (en) Cognitive platform for deriving effort metric for optimizing cognitive treatment
JP2023030085A5 (en)
JP2023076082A (en) Intervention effect analysis system, and intervention effect analysis method
Aghyppo et al. Norm, standards and tests in the structure of creation of monitoring of physical development, physical fitness and physical state
Ichinose et al. Comparison of task performance with different entertainment elements