JPS63259170A - Antigravity engine - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To obtain repulsive force against gravity, by generating an effect similar to that inverting a spin of axiation using the principle of a differential gear after a spin of polarity is fixed of the two elementary particles in the intensified magnetic field. CONSTITUTION:Fixing a spin direction of polarity of the two elementary particles in the intensified magnetic field thereafter generating an effect similar to that inverting a spin of axiation using the principle of a differential gear thus obtaining repulsive force against gravity as the reverse force, an antigravity engine is constituted.

Description

[Detailed Description of the Invention] First of all, please understand that this invention does not contradict the theory of relativity. There is a big reason why I say this. In other words, a condition for patents and utility models is that they must not violate the laws of nature, but when this is stated in relation to the theory of relativity, there are some parts that do not apply. This is because there is. In other words, there are still parts of the ``theory of relativity'' proposed by Einstein that are ``unknown'' to scientists, and other explanations can be given for these parts. That's what it means.

By the way, when I think about the theory of relativity, I think of something. Modern scientists are desperately trying to find a ``mono ball'' (single pole) in magnetism, unlike in electric charges. This is, however, a matter of course. If you can find it, it will be a blessing. Einstein's concept of "photon" caused a great deal of misunderstanding because of the word. When the word ``r,, child'' is used.

The reason for its name is that it preached something called ``particle nature.'' It is true that photons also act like two particles. However, when we acknowledge that the intervening substances act on elementary particles, which are the smallest units of matter in terms of the existence of matter, it is natural that the energy that moves along this diameter is as if it were an elementary particle. This is because they have no choice but to behave like particles. Since energy has the property of being undetectable apart from matter (please note that the existence of gravity can only be confirmed when it acts on matter), it behaves as if there are particles there. Of course. On the contrary.

In the case of gravity, since it is a force caused by elementary particles having energy, it is clear that it is related to the mechanism of elementary particles that determines whether this substance is a substance or not. In conclusion, photons are a force that acts as if they occupy a place in the space-time formed by elementary particles. In other words, although it is called a photon, it is not a substance.

The meaning of this is ``Among the things that were previously called elementary particles,
Elementary particles, excluding elementary particles with an integer spin such as the photon, are particles, and the photon is the source of their moving energy, or in other words, the ``vector.''

When we realize that time is a single point that represents the movement of matter, we can see that these 9 hours grow in a spiral shape along with the spin of elementary particles, which are the "big tree of matter." I have to go. When a space is set, the degree of progress of time with respect to that space appears as the resultant force of the spins of all the substances contained in that space.

Therefore, we can say that the product of time and space is constant. In the infinitesimal universe, the moment is infinite, and in the infinitesimal universe, even the time from the creation to the end of our universe is a blink of an eye.

At this point, we begin to see the natural appearance that all matter necessarily has spin in the same direction with respect to the pole. Gravity is a force that acts on all things in this way. It is obvious that it can be explained as follows.

By the way, regarding the speed of time expressed here, this theory has nothing to do with the bird-catching effect J.
Whether this theory is true remains to be seen.

No one can deny it. This will only be possible after applying the invention filed here as I say.

I have no choice but to mention ``positrons'' here.
The phenomenon of ``r pair annihilation due to the collision of positrons and electrons'' has been obtained from experimental results. this is.

When we talk about elementary particles, it seems as if we are trying to deny this theory.

Therefore, responding to this question is also one of our duties. In this regard, through this theory, we will find two types of 1-antielectrons. This can also explain the non-existence of magnetic objects/balls, but first, let's quote the previous concepts.

[The found positron had the same spin pole and axis and had a charge of ten. Therefore, the new theory is incorrect.''

It is true that positrons have the opposite properties to electrons, but just as we generally know that + and - exist independently at the same time, keep this in mind.

You can immediately see that this charge is different from magnetism, but in the mechanism that produces magnetism, what is rr51 electron?

It can be seen that the electrons are composed of elementary particles whose polarity (because this is the source of flow) is negative, the charges are equal, and the spins are in opposite directions. This feels natural.

Never found. Since the force that causes gravity is reversed, in order to find this, repulsive force must also be discovered. This is impossible because 2 Antielectrons in the true sense can only be proven through experiments that this theory teaches. Isn't a true scientist someone who doesn't criticize anything, but rather tries to prove it by experimenting on their own if it's possible? By the way, the conditions for actually conducting an experiment are that the magnetic poles must be fixed 5 strongly.

It must be strong enough to lift all magnetic materials against gravity outside the coil used in the experiment. Otherwise, it will fail. Therefore, in order to make the experiment easier, place a small strong magnet (an electromagnet is quite easy) just inside or outside the coil, and attach it to the toroidal coil. towards that pole.

The magnetic poles are caused to flow in the opposite direction to the magnetic poles that normally occur when electrons flow. By the way, since the elementary particles near the circumference (substances between the magnetic field formed by the magnetic poles and the magnetic field space generated by the high-frequency current of the coil) act as direct buoyancy, the objects that exist in that space Therefore, substances with higher specific gravity are more powerful. The heavier the object is, the more likely it is to fall, the greater the anti-gravity will be.)

As the frequency is increased above the condition, antigravity (repulsion) begins to occur. It looks like it might fall if it's heavy.

In this case, the heavier the object, the better the repulsive force will be. In this way, that space produces antigravity, and U and F provide evidence for this.

O0 researchers are in control. The fact that when U, F, and O accelerate from a state of rest to an astonishingly rapid rate that challenges modern science, the color of the band of light that occurs at the outermost part of the disk changes. It's being observed. This is the light of annihilation.

Pair annihilation occurs in two ways; one is a collision between a positron and an electron, and the other is a collision between an electron and an antielectron.
There is not one "r pair". “[Yin] [Yang] and [Empty]
There is a concept called ``[Rei]'', which is similar to this in the West. “[Negative] [Positive], [Minus] [Plus]”.

Given these words, there cannot be just one pair. This fact is supported by the fact that, regardless of East or West, there are words or concepts that express the nature of yin and yang and the state of reality and falsehood (negative and positive). However, most orthodox scientists would still take a negative stance against this concept. However, if I conduct an experiment that satisfies the conditions listed here, it will definitely prove that my interpretation is based on the correct understanding. Then, this gravity engine emerges as a big brother. By the way, this has not been tested yet5.That's 2For example, when it comes to equipment, I personally use all electric circuits (for low frequency circuits,
I can understand that.

(I'm very bad at high frequency circuits), but it's just because I don't have the luxury of being able to rely on reliable engineers. Since there's no point in explaining the theory of relativity here, I'll submit the details again in writing and move on to the next step.

Now, to explain using Figure 2, Figure 1 shows the structure of elementary particles in order to clear up the misunderstandings of physicists.

Now we have a monoball of charge.

I can see why you can't find a magnetic monoball.

Figure 1 1) shows the movement of electric charges relative to magnetism, which appears as a straight line vector, and Figure 1 2).

It represents the magnetic moment that occurs when a charge (which can be compared to a Tt current) advances. And Figure 2 shows the reason why photons behave like material particles.

Figure 3 simply shows that photons exert force through elementary particles. Elementary particles (of course, they are material particles)
Three come together to form an electron. However, for easily excited electrons, the energy by 1/2 spin is always insufficient for energy saturation. Therefore, when pressure is applied from the outside and a photon is brought there, the photon is attracted to the electric charge and gets stuck in the electron. However, this state now has a surplus of +1/2 due to the addition of one spin of a photon. So, I decided to remove the power from outside.

The electron becomes 1 1/2 energy state again, and a photon with ■spin flies out, which again collides with the elementary particle in the 9th order electron and propagates.

When we are full, there is an effect of vomiting, as if we can no longer eat, so when we loosen the force of pushing, the photons are immediately expelled and we return to our original state.
If you look at Figure 2, you can clearly see that it appears to have the size of an elementary particle.

In the force 3 diagram, the vector of the colliding force is a photon, and the ball is an elementary particle. This is a change in the spin of elementary particles, which are the smallest units of matter.

As expected, since photons are made up of elementary particles.

In this phenomenal world, we can conclude that elementary particles are the smallest units. By the way, this is cited here as evidence that there are two pairs of annihilations. In Figure 4, a) is an ordinary elementary particle, b) is an elementary particle that forms a positron pair, t) is an elementary particle that is a pure anti-electron pair, and d) is an elementary particle that forms an anti-positron pair. In other words, a) is negative (negative and real), b) is positive (positive and real), and in contrast to a), tsu) is negative (negative - negative and imaginary), and its counterpart a) is positive ( It can be seen that positive = positive and real). Here, the wise scholar
You should feel that the unknown parts of modern physics' theory of relativity that led to the contradictions are melting away. I don't know how many physicists there are on earth, but they all preach the theory of relativity, but the number of people who really understand it is 4 to 5 per century. There are only people,
I guess it depends on whether you notice this or not. If Han had been a little more careful, the scientist could have avoided this misunderstanding, but he was a little careless. U,F
, O, and Adamski types U and F are structures that are often cited in related research journals.

This is shown in Figure 5.

If we truly understand the theory of relativity, we can create a ``gravity engine''.

This has been said for a long time, but that is what this invention is... by the way.

The Adamski disk has a spherical capacitor and core (said to be made of barium titanate and ferrite), but as we understand the theory of relativity, we realize that this does not work in the way previously thought. Things will come to light.

For example, regarding core and spherical capacitors,
This is not directly related to flight. It is true that the source of anti-gravity force is mainly caused by the core, but in this structure.

Everything, including the humans inside, is creating anti-gravity.

These cores and capacitors rely on two rotating electric fields.

By changing the magnetic distribution around the disk, it controls the attitude W4 and plays the role of a battery for distant space travel. This is because the core and capacitor structures are aligned at an interval of 120° to the axis of the disk.

This is called three-fold symmetry, and in this case, it is similar to the ding that has been passed down from ancient China, because a container with three legs can be placed stably even in a place where the bottom is unstable. It is preferable to call it ``.'' In the core, the electric field rotates, but this is only to obtain a rotating magnetic field for attitude control. In other words, in elementary particles, the rotation of the electric charge and the tilt of the magnetic axis produce gravity, so as previously assumed (the rotation of the magnetic field does not include the rotation of the electric field). However, it is a force that is not generated by the rotation of an electric field or a rotation of a magnetic field, but is generated only through the interaction of the two.Therefore, it would be an understatement to call it a magnetic engine or an electric engine. The figure below shows the Daniel Fry type, which uses a single beat generated by the resonance of a toroidal coil wound around the end of a magnetic column for attitude control.

The interesting part of this is that since the coil is not the outermost circumference of the disk, by manipulating the nine frequencies, the positions of the attractive and repulsive points can be manipulated. In other words, by changing one frequency, the diameter of the part of the entire disc that is related to inversion gravity changes.In words that we can understand, it is difficult to explain it perfectly, but it is called "lens". To change the thickness of
become.

Figure 9 is by John R.R. Searle, commonly called.

It can be said that it has the structure of "Searle's disk", but the common denominator is a magnetic column and a toroidal coil placed around it. Here, we can see the possibility of obtaining 1 antigravity by using the structure of elementary particles mentioned earlier.

The principle of reversing the spin of elementary particles using a differential structure is shown in FIG. The necessary condition to produce a differential effect is λ≦
2*π*r0 ``Electric charge is a particle, magnetism is a vector.'' If you recognize this, you can easily go beyond traditional physics and complete this r anti-gravity engine.

Because of the training camp, the misunderstandings, and the fact that it was put together with a reason, the theory was full of patches, contradictions inevitably appeared, and it became extremely difficult to understand. To be honest, this theory is just like anything that physics has managed to push into orthodoxy up until now, of course there is no problem with that part, and it easily erases the contradictions that could not be erased. That alone is enough.

It turns out that this interpretation is correct.

Therefore, it is obvious that the anti-gravity engine shown here works. Since I do not belong to academia, I will disclose to the world that I have come to recognize the "true" theory of relativity through some other method, and I will also share with the public the concept of the theory of relativity that is considered to be correct, and how to properly apply it. I decided to introduce the gravity engine, which can be completed by doing this, as an invention. Here,
This has become a very interesting challenge to modern physics, but if I may give you a hint, ``the speed of light is both constant and not constant.'' The speed of light is simply a very small part of the entire universe. This is the threshold value that determines whether the universe as seen by an observer appears as matter. In other words, the universe that appears to the observer is a universe that is traveling at a speed less than the speed of light C relative to the observer who stands at one point in the entire universe. That is what it is. invisible,
11M can't be heard.

As long as it continues to exist as it is, it cannot be detected by machines and devices,
The sadness of modern physics lies in the fact that physicists who preach a four-dimensional universe do not realize that the ridiculous attitude of denying the existence of a real universe is due to a misunderstanding of the truth. There is.

Now, regarding the future prospects of double-gravity engines, these gravitational waves cause longitudinal wave phenomena in the two-dimensional space-time.

This is thought to enable club-style communication even between two points in distant space separated by two space-times, and if used by utilizing the interference effect of space-time and reality, it can be used to communicate between two or more points on arbitrary spatial coordinates. It is also possible to intersect independent electromagnetic waves (it is possible to instantly destroy matter at a distance, and as technology becomes more sophisticated, it is possible to create desired matter in space), and it is also used as a weapon. It can have effects incomparable to nuclear bombs and SSDs. However, at present, the most recognized necessity is as a "gravity engine" as a means of transportation.
Alternatively, it could be used as the only power source that can obtain stable large amounts of electricity in the world after a nuclear attack. This utilization will ensure that we can escape nuclear war by constructing facilities to maintain the nine civilizations with sufficient inspection underground, and that someday the light of civilization will once again be lit above ground. However, on the other hand, abuse
Irreversible, large-scale and decisive "final weapon"
When you think about it, it may be fair to make a decision while carefully considering that the risk of disclosing the information cannot be avoided.

For the time being, the #solution will be presented in a paper, and this application itself ends with the inspiring words of a scientist named "Alan", who is known to very few people. do.

``The fact that most top-level scientists have spoken at one time or another about the danger of a certain nuclear war, and despite numerous statements, no one seems to be paying attention to it.'' , because ``it merely poses a problem and does not provide a solution.'' This possibility is not actually a problem, but merely a symptom, which can be cured by dealing with the symptom. ” and “What if we earthlings.

As long as we believe that we are walking the royal road of science, but in reality we have strayed away from the core and are only clinging to theories that are barely maintained through patchwork, we will no longer make any progress.

Even if you are sometimes forced to take a step back, there is a possibility that if you don't do it, you will run into even bigger difficulties sooner. And we are right there. J 4, Brief explanation of the diagrams Figure 1 Conceptual diagram to teach the structural differences of elementary particles 1) Illustrating the direction of charge movement with respect to the lines of magnetic force Figure 2) Illustrating the direction of magnetic generation with respect to the direction of charge movement Figure 2 Photon Figure 3 shows why it was thought to be an elementary particle. Figure 4 shows that a photon is not an elementary particle due to the force of one spin. Figure 5 shows that annihilation does not involve only one pair.
Structural diagram of Adamski type disk Figure 6 Basic diagram of energy distribution of same type gravity engine Figure 7 Structural diagram of Daniel Fry type disk Figure 8 Same! ! 12 Basic diagram of energy distribution of gravity engine Figure 9 Structural diagram of Searle's disk (estimate) Figure 1O Basic diagram of energy distribution of the same type of gravity engine Figure 11 Spin reversal principle based on the operating principle Figure 1, display of events Patented in 1986 Relationship with Application No. 92585 Patent applicant 4, date of amendment order June 30, 1985 5, subject of amendment

Claims (1)

[Claims] In a strong magnetic field, the polar spin direction of the two elementary particles that are the source of all matter is fixed, and the same effect is produced as when the axial spin is reversed using the principle of a differential device. As a result, we obtain a ``repulsive force'' against ``gravity'' as an opposite force.