JPS62236923A - Slope construction work - Google Patents

Slope construction work

Info

Publication number
JPS62236923A
JPS62236923A JP7788386A JP7788386A JPS62236923A JP S62236923 A JPS62236923 A JP S62236923A JP 7788386 A JP7788386 A JP 7788386A JP 7788386 A JP7788386 A JP 7788386A JP S62236923 A JPS62236923 A JP S62236923A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
index
soil
hardness
slope
condition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP7788386A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Haruo Abe
阿部 春夫
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GREEN SANGYO KK
Original Assignee
GREEN SANGYO KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GREEN SANGYO KK filed Critical GREEN SANGYO KK
Priority to JP7788386A priority Critical patent/JPS62236923A/en
Publication of JPS62236923A publication Critical patent/JPS62236923A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To exactly attain vegetating work on a slope by a method in which indicating lines are drawn from three directions on a triangular coordinate provided with evaluating points from hardness index, soil quality index, and condition index, and the range surrounded by the indicating lines is selected. CONSTITUTION:A hardness index A is displayed by evaluating each of soil hardness, air-dryness, finger-pressure depth, setting limit, crack, and stratigraphic interval in the form of 0-10 points. A soil quality index B is displayed by evaluating each term of soil quality section, plasticity, cohesion, water permeability, soil testing, and rock and gravel in the form of 0-10 points. A condition index C is also displayed by evaculating each term of surface flow state, roughness, dryness, weather condition, and snow-covering condition in the form of 0-10 points. The indexes A, B, and C are plotted on numeral portions of each side of a triangular coordinate, indicating lines of about 60 deg. are drawn to two directions from the points, and the range surrounded by the indicating lines of three directions is selected as most suitable.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 11発明の目的 本発明は、法面工法に関するものである。[Detailed description of the invention] 11 Purpose of the invention The present invention relates to a slope construction method.

従来、法面工法を選択する場合には、法面の硬さが、植
物の根付けと生育に対応することができるかどうかを判
定するだけで行われていた。
Conventionally, when selecting a slope construction method, it was simply a matter of determining whether the hardness of the slope could support the rooting and growth of plants.

しかし、このような従来の方法による法面工法は、個人
の経験則による個別的な判断に基いて行うのであったた
め、工事後に苗の根付けができずに枯れてしまったり2
モルタル面に亀裂が生じたりしていた。このような問題
点を一掃するためには、もつと基本的な問題の解決が必
要であったことに鑑み、本発明は植生緑化工法の妥当性
を可能なかぎり正当化した工法を提供することを目的と
するものである。
However, since this conventional slope construction method is based on individual judgment based on personal experience, seedlings may not be able to take root after construction and may wither.
Cracks were appearing on the mortar surface. In order to eliminate such problems, it is necessary to solve a fundamental problem, and the present invention aims to provide a construction method that justifies the validity of the vegetation greening construction method as much as possible. The purpose is to

2、発明の構成 本発明の構成をその使用法とともに図面の実施例に基い
て説明する。
2. Structure of the Invention The structure of the present invention and its usage will be explained based on the embodiments shown in the drawings.

(イ) 法面調査個票について。(b) Regarding individual slope survey questionnaires.

第1図は、本発明において使用する法面調査個票の構成
を示している。
FIG. 1 shows the structure of a slope survey sheet used in the present invention.

調査項目の(1)〜(121は、各項目における状況種
類を(A)〜(G)に分けて表示しているが、これは現
地の状況を記録するものである。すなわち、現地におい
ては、この調査何票の各項目毎に一つを選んでマークす
る。
Survey items (1) to (121) display the situation type for each item divided into (A) to (G), but this is to record the situation at the site.In other words, at the site , select and mark one item for each item in this survey.

(13Jは硬度指数(A)を表わし、これは、1)土壌
硬度、2)風乾堅度、3)指圧深度、4)根入限界。
(13J represents the hardness index (A), which is 1) soil hardness, 2) air-dry hardness, 3) acupressure depth, and 4) rooting limit.

5)クラック、6)層序間隔の6項目に分れており、各
項目毎に0〜10点で評価し2判定する。
It is divided into 6 items: 5) cracks, and 6) stratigraphic spacing, and each item is evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 and given a 2 rating.

判定の目的として文章で表現しているが、目的は評価点
数を求めることである。この点数のとする。
Although the purpose of the evaluation is expressed in text, the purpose is to obtain an evaluation score. Let's take this score.

α滲は土性指数(B)を表わし、これは、1)土性区分
、2)回期性、3)粘着度、4)透水性、5)土壌検査
、6)岩礫石分の6項目に分れており、各項目毎に0〜
10点で評価し2判定する。
α permeation represents the soil index (B), which consists of six items: 1) soil type, 2) periodicity, 3) adhesion, 4) permeability, 5) soil testing, and 6) rock and gravel content. It is divided into 0 to 0 for each item.
Evaluate on a scale of 10 and make a 2 judgment.

この判定の目的は評価点数を求めることであ′す、その
方法は前記硬度指数(A)の場合と同じ。
The purpose of this judgment is to obtain an evaluation score, and the method is the same as in the case of the hardness index (A).

a9は条件指数(C)を表わし、これは、1)流面状能
、2)風化程度、3)荒廃度、4)乾燥度、5)気象条
件、6)積雪条件の6項目に分れており、各項目毎に0
〜10点で評価し2判定する。
a9 represents the condition index (C), which is divided into six items: 1) flow surface performance, 2) degree of weathering, 3) degree of deterioration, 4) degree of dryness, 5) meteorological conditions, and 6) snow conditions. and 0 for each item.
-Evaluate on a scale of 10 and give a rating of 2.

この判定の目的は評価点数を求めることであり、その方
法は前記硬度指数(A)の場合と同じ。
The purpose of this judgment is to obtain an evaluation score, and the method is the same as in the case of the hardness index (A).

(ロ) 法面工法選定座標 前記法面調査個票(イ)によって点数化された硬度(A
)、土性(B)2条件(C)の各指数を、三角座標の各
辺の数値部分にプロットし、この点から二方向に60度
の指示線を赤色などで引き、三方向の指示線で囲まれた
範囲が適合候補工法となる。
(b) Slope construction method selection coordinates The hardness (A
), Soil Properties (B) 2 Plot each index of condition (C) on the numerical part of each side of the triangular coordinates, draw a 60 degree indication line in red etc. in two directions from this point, and draw the indication in three directions. The range surrounded by lines is the applicable candidate construction method.

このようにして出された数点の候補工法から、前記法面
調査個票の調査項目(1)〜α2の各種類(A)〜(G
)を見て、現場状況に最適合の植生緑化工法等および併
用網工法等を選択し、決定すればよい。
From the several candidate construction methods presented in this way, each type (A) to (G
), and select and decide on the vegetation greening method, combined netting method, etc. that best suits the site situation.

次に本発明の使用例について説明する。Next, an example of use of the present invention will be described.

まず第1図に示した「法面調査個票」における各調査項
目について、該当する個所にそれぞれ現地状況をマーク
する(第3図参照)この具体例では、クヌギ、ナラなど
の雑木林を開削した路線で、地滑り頻度の多い寺泊層に
属し、灰色泥岩の乾燥・湿潤に弱い地質で、部分的に侵
食が始まっていて、融雪直後でもあって礫層・の下部よ
り浸出水がある。断層や火山群落とは遠く、路線への影
響は少ない。
First, for each survey item in the "slope survey individual sheet" shown in Figure 1, mark the local situation in the corresponding place (see Figure 3). The route belongs to the Teradomari Formation, which has a high frequency of landslides, and has gray mudstone geology that is sensitive to dry and wet conditions.Erosion has begun in some areas, and even immediately after the snow melts, there is leachate from the bottom of the gravel layer. It is far from faults and volcanic communities, so there is little impact on the route.

硬度指数の平均は5.2であり、植生可能の限界を僅か
に超えている。
The average hardness index is 5.2, which is slightly above the limit of possible vegetation.

土性指数の平均は5.8であり、現況では植生は困難で
ある。
The average soil quality index is 5.8, making it difficult to support vegetation under the current conditions.

条件指数の平均は6.7であり、厳しい条件であるので
、植生緑化工法と併用網張工法とが共に必要である。
The average condition index is 6.7, which is a severe condition, so both the vegetation greening method and the combined netting method are necessary.

そこで、これらの指数を基礎にして第2図に示した「法
面工法選定座標」に、前記調査結果点数をプロットする
と、第4図のようになる。
Therefore, if the survey result scores are plotted on the "slope construction method selection coordinates" shown in FIG. 2 based on these indices, the result will be as shown in FIG. 4.

この結果、A、 B、 Cの指示線で囲まれた網目部分
が適合候補工法となる。そこで、緑化工法等では、客土
吹付工、植生穴ビックエア岩盤緑化土壌菌、岩盤緑化有
機質が候補工法となったが、このうち、植生穴ピツクエ
は地質が鋭敏であることから除外し、また岩盤緑化有機
質は工費が高検し他の工法があることから、これも除外
する。次に、併用網張等では肥料袋付ネット。
As a result, the mesh area surrounded by the indication lines A, B, and C becomes the compatible candidate construction method. Therefore, candidate soil spraying, vegetation hole big air bedrock greening soil bacteria, and bedrock greening organic material were selected as greening methods, but among these, the vegetation hole pitskue was excluded due to its sensitive geology, and the bedrock greening method was excluded. Greening organic matter is also excluded because it is expensive and there are other methods. Next, for combined netting, etc., use a net with fertilizer bags.

亀甲金網張工、特殊接着モルタル、菱形ラス綱玉、軽量
法枠工が候補工法となったが、このうち、肥料袋付ネッ
トは地質になじまず積雪地であることから除外し、亀甲
金網張工は地質を保護する強度が不足することから除外
し、また軽量法枠工は法枠を保持する基礎の地質強度が
不足することから、これも除外する。
Candidate construction methods were tortoiseshell wire mesh, special adhesive mortar, diamond-shaped lath rope balls, and lightweight frame construction, but among these, nets with fertilizer bags were excluded because they do not adapt to the geology of snow-covered areas, and tortoiseshell wire mesh was selected. Light slope construction is excluded because it lacks the strength to protect the geology, and lightweight slope construction is also excluded because the foundation that holds the slope lacks geological strength.

このようにして選定された候補として、第一候補は、緑
化工法等では客土吹付工、併用網張工等では特殊接着モ
ルタルとなり、第二候補は、緑化工法等では岩壁緑化土
壌菌、併用網張工等では菱形ラス綱玉となった。
As candidates selected in this way, the first candidate is soil spraying for greening methods, special adhesive mortar for combined netting, etc., and the second candidate is rock wall greening soil fungi for greening methods, etc. For net tension work, etc., it became a diamond-shaped lath rope ball.

3、発明の効果 本発明はこのような構成から成るものであるため、予め
定めた「法面調査個票」と「法面工法選定座標」とを、
現地において使用すること゛によって、簡単かつ的確に
法面の植生緑化工法・等と併用網張工法等の候補を選ぶ
とともにそのうち最適合工法を決定することができるよ
うになり、従来個人の熟練的な経験に依存していたこと
の欠点を全く一掃することができ、常に客観的に妥当性
のある基礎資料に基いて法面工事を行うことができるよ
うになり、その効果は多大なものである。
3. Effects of the invention Since the present invention has such a configuration, the predetermined "slope survey individual sheet" and "slope construction method selection coordinates" are
By using it on-site, it becomes possible to easily and accurately select candidates such as slope vegetation greening method, combined netting method, etc., and decide on the most suitable method. The shortcomings of relying on experience can be completely eradicated, and slope work can now always be carried out based on objectively valid basic materials, which has a tremendous effect. .

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は法面調査個票、第2図は法面工法選定座標を示
し、第3図は第1図の使用例、第4図は第2図の使用例
を示している。 特 許 出 願 人  グリーン産業株式会社手続補正
書(方式) 昭和61年7月24日 1、事件の表示 特願昭61−077883号 2、発明の名称 法面工法 3、補正をする者 事件との関係 特許出願人 4、代理人 昭和61年6月24日     1す1“J−6、補正
の対象 図面(第3図、第4図) 〒、補正の内容 別紙のとおり。
Fig. 1 shows the slope survey data, Fig. 2 shows the slope construction method selection coordinates, Fig. 3 shows an example of how Fig. 1 is used, and Fig. 4 shows an example of how Fig. 2 is used. Patent applicant: Green Sangyo Co., Ltd. Procedural amendment (method) July 24, 1985 1, Indication of the case Patent application No. 1983-077883 2, Name of the invention Slope construction method 3, Person making the amendment Case and Relationship between Patent Applicant 4, Agent June 24, 1986 1-1 "J-6, Drawings to be amended (Figures 3 and 4) 〒, Contents of the amendment as shown in the attached sheet.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] (1)現地状況を表示した山林植生・近隣植生・代表地
質・土性色相・地滑痕跡・岩石比率・ガリ侵食・湧水湿
潤・背後状況・地層傾斜・断層軸線・火山群落の項目に
ついてその各々の種類毎に記載するとともに、硬度指数
・土性指数・条件指数の項目について各項目について各
項目別に、硬度指数については土壌硬度・風乾堅度・指
圧深度・根入限界・クラック度・層序間隔を、土性指数
については土性区分・可塑性・粘着度透水性・土壌検査
・岩礫石分を、条件指数については法面状態・風化程度
・荒廃度・乾燥程度気象条件・積雪条件をそれぞれ点数
化して記載して成る法面調査個票を設け、他方前記調査
個票の硬度指数・土性指数・条件指数にそれぞれ合わせ
て評価点数を記載した三角座標を設け、この三角座標に
三方向から指示線を引きこの指示線によつて囲まれた範
囲を最適合の植生緑生工法等として選定するように成る
法面工法。
(1) Field conditions are displayed for the following items: mountain forest vegetation, neighboring vegetation, representative geology, soil color, landslide traces, rock ratio, gully erosion, spring water wetness, background conditions, strata inclination, fault axis, and volcanic community. In addition to listing each type, the hardness index, soil texture index, and condition index are listed separately for each item.For the hardness index, soil hardness, air-dry hardness, acupressure depth, rooting limit, crack degree, and layer. For soil index, soil classification, plasticity, cohesiveness, permeability, soil test, rock and gravel content, and for condition index, slope condition, degree of weathering, degree of devastation, degree of dryness, meteorological conditions, and snow conditions. A slope survey individual sheet is provided in which each score is recorded, and on the other hand, a triangular coordinate is provided in which the evaluation score is recorded according to the hardness index, soil texture index, and condition index of the survey individual sheet. A slope construction method in which a direction line is drawn and the area surrounded by the direction line is selected as the most suitable vegetation greening method, etc.
(2)三角座標に、併用網張等の工法を併記して成る特
許請求の範囲(1)項に記載した法面工法。
(2) The slope construction method described in claim (1), which includes a construction method such as combined netting in triangular coordinates.
JP7788386A 1986-04-04 1986-04-04 Slope construction work Pending JPS62236923A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7788386A JPS62236923A (en) 1986-04-04 1986-04-04 Slope construction work

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7788386A JPS62236923A (en) 1986-04-04 1986-04-04 Slope construction work

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS62236923A true JPS62236923A (en) 1987-10-17

Family

ID=13646471

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP7788386A Pending JPS62236923A (en) 1986-04-04 1986-04-04 Slope construction work

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS62236923A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH03104307U (en) * 1990-02-09 1991-10-29
JP2020193557A (en) * 2019-05-29 2020-12-03 中国水利水電科学研究院China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Bound dam and method for constructing the same

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH03104307U (en) * 1990-02-09 1991-10-29
JP2020193557A (en) * 2019-05-29 2020-12-03 中国水利水電科学研究院China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Bound dam and method for constructing the same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hopley et al. Nearshore fringing reefs in North Queensland
Yu et al. Storm cycles in the last millennium recorded in Yongshu Reef, southern South China Sea
Creamer et al. The Fortaleza valley, Peru: Archaeological investigation of late Archaic sites (3000–1800 BC)
Johns et al. The Faris project: preliminary report upon the 1986 and 1988 seasons
Tuttle et al. Paleoseismology study northwest of the New Madrid seismic zone
Rokade et al. Water resources development action plan for sasti watershed, Chandrapur district, Maharashtra using remote sensing and geographic information system
CN103605879B (en) Mountainous village and town construction land suitability assessment method based on geological disaster
JPS62236923A (en) Slope construction work
Bull Lichenometry dating of coseismic changes to a New Zealand landslide complex
Daniel Jr et al. An archaeological survey and petrographic description of rhyolite sources in the Uwharrie Mountains, North Carolina
タムラトシカズ et al. Land characteristics of the hills and their modification by man: With special reference to a few cases in the Tama Hills, west of Tokyo
Haans et al. The application of soil survey in The Netherlands
Hara et al. A preliminary report on the excavation of Ille Cave, El Nido, Palawan
Koeberl et al. The ICDP Lake Bosumtwi drilling project: A first report
Borrelli Risk assessment of human-induced accelerated soil erosion processes in the intermountain watersheds of Central Italy: A Case Study of the Upper Turano Watershed (Latium-Abruzzi).
Orton et al. Heritage impact assessment for the proposed Vredendal Inca Solar Energy Facility, Vredendal Magisterial District, Western Cape
Runggaldier et al. Hats Kaab: A Newly Discovered E-Group at the Closing of the 13th Baktun
Marr SOUTH MOUNTAIN PRECONTACT METARHYOLITE QUARRYING
Cole The Geology of Clare Island, County Mayo
Sinclair A preliminary account of the exploration of the Potter Creek Cave, Shasta County, California
Anyon et al. Archeological Testing at the Fairchild Site (LA 45732), Otero County, New Mexico
Henderson Archaic Occupation on the Santa Cruz Flats: The Tator Hills Archaeological Project
Milana et al. Site characterization report at the seismic station IT. PGN–Pignataro (FR)
Griscom “Backyard Archaeology”: An Archaeological Survey of 19714 Encino Knoll Street, San Antonio, Texas, 78259
Snyder Suicide Bend6 (20MT158): An Archaeological Investigation in the Huron-Manistee National Forests along the Manistee River, Manistee County, Michigan