JPS62151945A - Automatic verification system of repeating test result - Google Patents

Automatic verification system of repeating test result

Info

Publication number
JPS62151945A
JPS62151945A JP60290638A JP29063885A JPS62151945A JP S62151945 A JPS62151945 A JP S62151945A JP 60290638 A JP60290638 A JP 60290638A JP 29063885 A JP29063885 A JP 29063885A JP S62151945 A JPS62151945 A JP S62151945A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
log
terminal
test
comparing
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP60290638A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Masayuki Kotani
小谷　正幸
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP60290638A priority Critical patent/JPS62151945A/en
Publication of JPS62151945A publication Critical patent/JPS62151945A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management
    • G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites

Abstract

PURPOSE:To automatically decide a test result by comparing not the output of a test program but the log information for recovering a system. CONSTITUTION:The transaction is inputted from a terminal simulator to a terminal inlet outlet log 1 input at an old version, inputted from an actual terminal 2 concerning the new support function and terminal, and the inputted transaction is processed by a test program 3. At a log data set, the information for recovering the system such as data base updating information and the terminal input output information is obtained. After the test, an obtained log 4 is sorted with an input terminal name as a key, a sorted log 5 and a sorted log 6 of an old version are compared by the log comparing program. The log comparing program deletes the area except the comparing object, and the scroll comparison is executed. By assembling the sort and scroll comparison, the test result and the automatic verification system can be easily prepared.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔発明の利用分野〕 本発明は、オンラインコントロールプログラムのバージ
ョンアップ時等に、前回と同一のテ。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Application of the Invention] The present invention uses the same method as the previous time when upgrading an online control program.

スト（繰り返しテスト）を実施した際、四グ情報の比較
により、テスト結果を自動的に検証するものである。When a test (repeated test) is performed, the test results are automatically verified by comparing the four-way information.

〔発明の背景〕[Background of the invention]

テスト結果の自動検証方式としては、特開昭６０−６９
７５３号公報に示されるように、正解集ファイルとテス
トプログラムの出力結果の照合ニ。As an automatic verification method for test results, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 60-69
As shown in Publication No. 753, the correct answer collection file and the output results of the test program are compared.

よるものが知られている。It is known that it depends on

この方法は、正解集ファイルの作成及び、テ。This method involves creating a correct answer collection file and te.

ストプログラムの出力を正解集ファイルと照合。Check the output of the strike program against the correct answer collection file.

可能な形にしておく必要があった。I needed to make it possible.

〔発明の目的〕[Purpose of the invention]

本発明の目的は、かかる不便を解消し、自動。 The purpose of the present invention is to eliminate such inconvenience and to provide an automatic system.

検証を容易にすることにある。The purpose is to facilitate verification.

〔発明の概要〕[Summary of the invention]

本発明は、オンラインコントロールプロゲラムの繰り返
しテスト（前回と同一データによる。The present invention is a repeated test of an online control program (using the same data as the previous time).

テスト）において、テストプログラムの出力で。test), in the output of the test program.

はなく、システム回復用のログ情報（ファイル更新情報
、端末入力情報等）の比較により、テスト結果を自動的
に判定するものである。また結果比較の際、バージョン
アップ時のテストデータの追加・端末の追加も可能とす
る。Instead, test results are automatically determined by comparing system recovery log information (file update information, terminal input information, etc.). When comparing results, it is also possible to add test data and devices when upgrading.

繰り返しテスト実施後、前回のテストで出力されたログ
情報との比較を行う際、入力端末名称等であらかじめソ
ートしてからログ情報の比較を行う。比較の際、不一致
の場合には、後続。After repeated tests, when comparing the log information output from the previous test, the log information is sorted by input terminal name, etc. before the log information is compared. When comparing, in case of a mismatch, the successor.

レコードを指定した範囲で相互比較（スクリム。Compare records with each other within a specified range (scrim).

ル比較）することにより、データの追加、端末。By adding data to the terminal (by comparing files).

の追加があっても、比較可能となる。Comparison is possible even with the addition of

〔発明の実施例〕　　　　　　　　　　　　　　５以Ｆ
、本発明の一実施例を第１図により説明。[Embodiments of the invention] 5 and above
, an embodiment of the present invention will be explained with reference to FIG.

する。do.

（１）　　旧バージョンでの端末入出力ログ１人力に、
端末シミュレータから、トランザクションを。(1) In the old version, terminal input/output log could be done by one person.
Transactions from a terminal simulator.

入力する。　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　１゜（２）
新規サポート機能・端末については、突端。input. 1° (2)
Regarding new support functions and devices, please check the tip.

末２より入力する。Enter from end 2.

（′５）　　入力されたトランザクションは、テストプ
ログラム３で処理される。('5) The input transaction is processed by the test program 3.

（４）　　ログデータセットには、データベース更新、
５情報、端末入出力情報等のシステム回復用の情報が、
取得される。(4) The log data set includes database updates,
5 information, terminal input/output information, and other system recovery information.
be obtained.

（５）　　テスト後、取得されたログ４を入力端末名を
キーにしてソートする。(5) After the test, sort the acquired logs 4 using the input terminal name as a key.

（６）　　ソートされたログ５を旧バージョンのソート
済ｐグ６とをログ比較プログラムにより比。(6) Compare the sorted log 5 with the old version of the sorted pg 6 using a log comparison program.

較する。ログ比較プログラムは、比較対象外。Compare. Log comparison programs are not included in the comparison.

の領域（時刻の入る領域等）′？ｉ：削除し、スフ。area (area where time is entered, etc.)′? i: Delete it.

ロール比較（不一致の場合、後続レコードを。Role comparison (in case of mismatch, subsequent records.

指定した範囲で相互比較）を行う。(mutual comparison within the specified range).

本実施例によれば、ソートとスクロール比較。According to this embodiment, sorting and scrolling comparison.

を組み合せることにより、容易に、テスト結果。By combining the test results.

自動検証システムを作成することができた。　。We were able to create an automatic verification system. .

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

（１）　　繰り返しテスト実施時、回復用ログの比較、
。(1) Comparison of recovery logs when performing repeated tests,
.

により、結果の検証ができるので、既存テス。This allows you to verify the results of existing tests.

ドブ四グラムの活用、テストプログラムの作成が容易。It is easy to use Dobu Four Grams and create test programs.

（２）繰り返しテスト実施時、バージョンアップ時の機
能追加部分のデータを追加でき、追加分は次回の繰り返
しテスト及び、自動検ｆｌｌＦの対象となる。(2) When performing repeated tests, data for functions added during version upgrades can be added, and the added data will be subject to the next repeated test and automatic inspection fllF.

（３）端末内のトランザクション入力順序が、一定であ
れば、端末間の入力順序、端末の追加があってもより、
テストの自由度がｉ９石い。(3) If the transaction input order within a terminal is constant, the input order between terminals and even if a terminal is added,
The degree of freedom of the test is i9 stone.

・　３　・ （４）　　ソート、スクロール比較のプログラムが、あ
る場合）それらを部品として使用することにより、少な
い工数で、自動検証システムを。・ 3 ・ (4) If there are programs for sorting and scrolling comparison), by using them as parts, an automatic verification system can be created with less man-hours.

作成できる。Can be created.

４、図面の簡単な説明　　　　　　　　　　　　。4. Brief explanation of the drawings.

第１図は本発明の一実施例による繰り返しテスト結果の
自動検証方式の構成要素および、データの流れを示す説
明図である。FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the components and data flow of an automatic verification method for repeated test results according to an embodiment of the present invention.

１・・・端末入出力ログ ２・・・実端末 ３・・・テストプログラム ４．５・・・ログ ６・・・ソート済ログ1...Terminal input/output log 2...Real terminal 3...Test program 4.5...Log 6... Sorted log

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] １、オンラインコントロールプログラムより出力された
ログ情報を入力端末名称等のキーとなる情報でソートし
、同様のキーでソートされた旧バージョンのログ情報と
比較し、テスト結果を検証することを特徴とする。繰返
しテスト結果の自動検証方式。1. The feature is that the log information output from the online control program is sorted by key information such as input terminal name, and the test results are verified by comparing it with the log information of the previous version that was sorted by the same key. do. Automatic verification method for repeated test results.
JP60290638A 1985-12-25 1985-12-25 Automatic verification system of repeating test result Pending JPS62151945A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP60290638A JPS62151945A (en) 1985-12-25 1985-12-25 Automatic verification system of repeating test result

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP60290638A JPS62151945A (en) 1985-12-25 1985-12-25 Automatic verification system of repeating test result

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS62151945A true JPS62151945A (en) 1987-07-06

Family

ID=17758557

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP60290638A Pending JPS62151945A (en) 1985-12-25 1985-12-25 Automatic verification system of repeating test result

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS62151945A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016071400A (en) * 2014-09-26 2016-05-09 株式会社野村総合研究所 Test execution device, test execution method, and computer program

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016071400A (en) * 2014-09-26 2016-05-09 株式会社野村総合研究所 Test execution device, test execution method, and computer program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
German et al. Automating the measurement of open source projects
Wang et al. Formalizing and integrating the dynamic model within OMT
CN102737020B (en) Method for initializing multi-tenant database, and apparatus thereof
Ljubovic et al. Plagiarism detection in computer programming using feature extraction from ultra-fine-grained repositories
US20050086022A1 (en) System and method for providing a standardized test framework
JPS62151945A (en) Automatic verification system of repeating test result
CN112651716A (en) Data processing method, device and storage medium
CN112966240A (en) Method applied to DFM system integration
Hung et al. Continuous Integration for Android Application Development and Training
JP2585460B2 (en) Test data creation method
JPH05216706A (en) On-line simulation system
JP3547691B2 (en) Job inspection apparatus, job inspection method, and recording medium recording job inspection program
CA3114250C (en) Machine assisted data aggregation
JPH0581110A (en) Automatic inspection system for consistency of index file
JPH05120065A (en) Testing and verifying method for computer program
Grocevs et al. The comparison of modern plagiarism identification methods in programming assessments
Allott et al. Automate Your Tests-You Won’t Regress It!
Dronkers Application of software quality assurance to a specific scientific code development task
CN113780784A (en) Intelligent plan management system and management method thereof
CN117609088A (en) Data testing method and system and electronic equipment
JPS63259723A (en) Cobol program generator
JPS6134640A (en) Inspecting method of program
JPH05257772A (en) Master file updating system
JPH03257637A (en) Automatic check item extracting mechanism
SCHROER et al. Independent software verification and validation for the inertial upper stage