JPS5924799A - Foamable hard surface detergent composition - Google Patents

Abstract

(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.

Description

[Detailed description of the invention]

The present invention relates to a two-part foaming hard surface cleaning composition that can effectively remove stains from hard surfaces such as plastics, ceramics, tiles, joints, and inside drain pipes. Traditionally, household detergents for plastics, ceramics, and tiles have been known as liquid detergents containing alkali or alkali as their main ingredients, and as detergents for joints, powdered or liquid detergents containing abrasive materials have been used. It has been known. However, all of these detergents still had insufficient cleaning power. In recent years, with the emergence of Western-style general housing or high-rise JT4 apartment complexes and the Westernization of eating habits, food waste, excrement, and hair have been found inside drain pipes, traps, and filter pipes in kitchens, bathrooms, and toilets. 1. The paper is clogged with dirt such as mud and bathroom grime, and it adheres to the inner wall surface of the pipe. Therefore, there are many phenomena in which the flow of water inside the pipe is obstructed. This kind of dirt inside the drain pipe is one of the most difficult to remove among the hard surface dirt in the home, partly because it is difficult to reach the dirty part. Conventionally, drain pipes, traps, To remove dirt from filter tubes, etc., use chlorinated hydrocarbons and activators.
A method of emulsifying (US Pat. No. 3,553,145), a method of decomposing dirt with enzymes and microorganisms (Japanese Patent Publication No. 38-26465), a method using sodium percarbonate and an activator (Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 38-26465). 152/406 of 1972), a method using adhesive and alkaline carbonate (JP-A-53-50207)
method using an oxidizing agent such as an acid agent, alkaline carbonate, and sodium percarbonate (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 53-50208)
No. 2, Publication No. 2006), etc., but none of these have sufficient cleaning power. US Pat. No. 3,471,407 reports a method of adding strong alkalis such as caustic soda, aluminum and inorganic nitrates, but this is extremely dangerous. Also, U.S. Patent Specification νJ No. 3,538,0
In specification No. 08, IJ, So. A method has been disclosed in which silica sol is mixed with strong hydrogen such as HC/, HNOs, orthophosphoric acid, or sulfamic acid, but this method is also extremely dangerous and highly corrosive. On the other hand, it is also known to use aerosol injection pressure to open a completely clogged drain pipe, but this method has little effect on dirt deposited on the walls. It may be possible to physically clean the inside of the drain pipe, but this is time-consuming and difficult to do easily at home. The present invention was made in order to solve the problems of the prior art such as upper H pi, and easily removes stains from hard surfaces such as plastics, ceramics, tiles, joints, bathtubs, and the inside of drain pipes. It is an object of the present invention to provide a two-component foaming hard surface cleaning composition that can effectively remove and remove scales. That is, the two-component foaming hard surface cleaning composition of the present invention The product is characterized by having the following F agent and B★11. Both are brought into contact or mixed during use, and water is added if necessary. (1) A agent: Effective oxygen h+ is 0 .25~25% hydrogen peroxide solution. 12) B 1]: Water 1Etl sodium chloride = 01~
Alkaline Hari with an alkalinity of 50 Chi. I will now explain this defense in detail. A wound rarely heals with a water bath solution containing 05-50 wt I4% hydrogen peroxide. If the combination of peroxide and hydrogen chloride in Part A is less than 0.05%, sufficient washing gradient cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 50%, the stability is poor and it is dangerous to handle, which is undesirable. Agent B is an alkali having an alkalinity of 0.1 to 50 h in terms of sodium hydroxide, and its properties may be either a solution or a solid (usually powder). Any alkaline substance can be used as the main component of the alkaline agent, but preferred examples include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, Examples include sodium metasilicate and sodium orthosilicate, among which sodium hydroxide is preferred. The alkalinity of the alkaline agent that is agent B is 0.1 to 50 h, preferably 0.5 to 1 in terms of sodium hydroxide.
It is 0chi. If this value is less than 0.1 cIb, sufficient cleaning power cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 50 cIb,
It is not preferable because it has poor stability such as precipitation of crystals or precipitation during storage and is extremely dangerous. Here, the titration volume determined by dissolving the alkalinity and the alkaline agent with normal hydrochloric acid was determined in terms of caustic soda using the following formula. Arkatt = + E = 2-! x,oo (%)
1 1 sample of agent Wro 11 (f) A: N hydrochloric acid titration constant (-) f: force 1 curve Agent B may be either liquid or solid, and examples of particularly preferred combinations with agent A are as follows. ≦ (11 Liquid/liquid type A agent: 1.0 to 35% hydrogen peroxide solution B111: to to 10% sodium hydroxide aqueous solution (2) Liquid/powder type A agent: 1.0 to 35 Powder composition containing 30 to 100 g of accumulated water peroxide B angle lj: 30 to 100 g of sodium carbonate The foaming detergent composition of the present invention can be further applied to either one of the A agent and the zero-shaving agent, or both. A surfactant can also be added to the foam.The surfactant mainly contributes to the stability of foaming, as will be explained in detail in a moment.

[7] Therefore, any fruit that has young fruits such as can be used, and those that can be safely stored in the A component or the B component are preferred. In terms of surfactants, anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, and amphoteric surfactants (2) can all be used, but particularly preferred are anionic surfactants. ionic surfactants and nonionic surfactants. Specific examples of such surfactants include the following. 11) Anionic surfactant Fatty salt having 10 to 20 carbon atoms Alkyl sulfate carbon having carbon nlo to 18 Carbon=AlO to 18 alkylbenzene sulfonate
(3) a having 8 to 18 carbon atoms
- Olefin sulfonate Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether sulfonate with a carbon number of 8 to 18 and an average number of added moles of ethylene oxide (EO) EOP of 1 to 10 moles - Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether sulfonate with a carbon number of 6 to 12 and WOπ = 6 to 20 Ethylene alkylphenyl ether sulfite nonionic surfactant carbon ttxo~20 alcohol EO adduct (EO txo =
6-20) Alkylphenol E whose alkyl group has 6-12 carbon atoms
O adduct (EOP = 6-20) with 7J
Il compound (3 to 30 in 80) Fat t#REO adduct with 12 to 18 carbon atoms (Eop =
5-50) Cation Kaizan active agent quaternary ammonium salt imidazolinium quaternary salt (4) Ampholytic surfactant Betaine Amino-P imidacillin-F Among the surfactants, it is particularly superior in terms of foaming properties. Those listed are alkyl sulfates with an average carbon number of 12,
Alkylbenzenesulfones whose alkyl group has an average carbon number of 12), [[[α-olefin sulfonates with 12 to 18 carbon atoms], polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether (l
anionic surfactants such as iOP = 8 to 10), lauryl alcohol EO adducts (EO = 8 to 10), nonylphenyl ether JtO adducts (EOπ; 8 to
Examples include nonionic surfactants such as IO). In terms of stability during storage, alkyl sulfates with an average carbon number of 12, polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether (GOP = s ~ 10), lauryl alcohol Eo adduct (EOP = 8 ~ 10), nonylphenyl ether I
O adducts (EOP=8-10) are superior. In addition, we have selected materials that have an excellent effect of promoting penetration into dirt, such as alkyl sulfates with an average carbon number of 12, alkylbenzene sulfonates whose alkyl groups have an average carbon number of 12, and a-olefins with 12 to 18 carbon atoms. Examples include anionic surfactants such as sulfonate and polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether (EOP=8 to 1G). The surfactant is 0.1 to 20% by weight in agent A or agent B.
It is preferable to add it so that it is included, and more preferably in the range of 05 to 10 tons. If this amount is less than 0.1 yen, sufficient foaming power or foam stability cannot be obtained.
If it exceeds 20 inches, the stability during storage will be significantly deteriorated, and the cleaning effect will be reduced due to the reduction in the amount of active ingredients. Next, a method for using the hard surface cleaning composition of the present invention and a cleaning mechanism will be explained. Parts A and B are stored separately and each is applied separately onto the hard surface soil at the time of use. The order of application may be either first or simultaneously. In the case of liquid/powder type, it is more practical to first spray the powder (Part B) and then pour the liquid (Part A). Liquid/liquid types are generally easier to handle and are convenient for applying the desired number to any hard surface, especially hard surfaces such as hard to reach areas or vertical surfaces. Hydrogen permide water #i Exists relatively stably in acidic conditions, but decomposes in alkaline conditions. Therefore, when Agent A and Agent B come into contact with each other on hard surface dirt, nascent oxygen is generated, and the effect of oxidizing and decomposing the dirt and the cleaning effect of Alka UK work synergistically. -Also, the large amount of air bubbles produced by the reaction is used to remove dirt by physically trapping it. Therefore, it can be effectively removed even in hard-to-reach places, and even on the outer surface, it can be removed without scrubbing or the like. Furthermore, due to the generation of air bubbles, the cleaning agent can be spread even to places where the cleaning agent is difficult to reach, such as recesses, due to the filling power of the air bubbles, and cleaning can be performed efficiently. In addition, foaming makes it easier for the cleaning agent to adhere, allowing it to remain on ship slopes and vertical surfaces for a sufficient period of time required for cleaning. Furthermore, the adhesion of dirt can be reduced by the heat of reaction between Agent A and Agent B. As described above, in the cleaning composition of the present invention, (1) oxidizing power 12) physical external force on dirt due to foaming, filling of cleaning agent, and adhesion of cleaning agent due to decomposition of hydrogen peroxide ice (3) The heat of reaction and the cleaning power of the alkali work synergistically to provide superior cleaning power that could not be imagined with conventional cleaning agents. It is very common for the hard surfaces to be cleaned to have slopes or surfaces that are difficult to clean, such as recesses or corners. Therefore, foaming power or stability of iiJ is an important factor. For example, consider the drain pipe of a household sink. This drain pipe has no trap, descends straight down, and has a bellows structure on the side wall. Further, a flowing channel is formed within the pipe, and when water is allowed to flow, the water does not flow uniformly within the pipe, but flows along the channel. If you pour the cleaning agent into a drain pipe like this, the cleaning agent will only come into contact with specific parts, and it will quickly flow down, making it impossible to clean efficiently. 52-152406-
No. 53-50207, No. 53-5020
A powdered foamable composition is also reported in Publication No. 8, but
These foams have insufficient foaming power when starting, and when applied to the above-mentioned drain pipes, they quickly flow while foaming. On the other hand, when using agent A and agent B of the present invention,
Both the amount of foam and the foaming power are strong, and it fills the entire inside of the drain pipe and exerts physical force on the dirt.Furthermore, it slowly descends inside the drain pipe and removes the dirt for a sufficient amount of time. contact across. In particular, at least one of agent A or agent B contains a surfactant.
When it is contained, the foaming power is increased and the generated bubbles are stabilized, and the above-mentioned foaming effect is further enhanced. As is clear from the above explanation, the two-component foaming detergent silk composition of the present invention is effective on all hard surfaces,
Cleaning areas where the cleaning agent easily flows, such as vertical surfaces, recesses, corners, and inside pipes 1. It is particularly effective for cleaning difficult areas, and can effectively clean drain pipes, which are the most difficult to clean in general households. In the cleaning composition of the present invention, additives such as Glauber's salt, sodium carbonate, IB1 triphosphate, sodium diphosphate, tripolyphosphate, and pyrocariphosphate are further added to agent A and/or agent L). Additives that are normally cooled can be added to the detergent, such as detergents, preservatives, perfumes, disinfectants, chelating agents, activators, alkalinizers, hydroxides, and other cleaning agents. These additives are preferably added so as not to impair the stability or function of Part A and Part B. Example 1 (3) Prepare compositions 1 to 9 with the following compositions (weight in grams).
9 is a commercially available product) and was used for the test. Compositions 1 to 3, which are products of the present invention, are two-dose types, and the others are normal one-dose types. +1) Composition 1 (invention) Part A: Hydrogen peroxide 5 Water 95 Part B: Caustic soda 5 Water 95 (4
1 (2) Composition 2 (invention) Part A: Hydrogen peroxide 5 Water 95 Part B: Caustic soda 4 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether 3 Fragrance 0.5 Water 92.5 Composition 3 (invention) Part A: Peroxide Hydrogen oxide 5 Water 95 Part B: Soda carbonate 30 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether 5 Fragrance 1 Water 64 Composition 4 (comparative example) Supercarbonated soda 40 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether 1O Sodium tripolyphosphate 10 mg Nitric acid
40 Composition 5 (Comparative Example) Overpopulated Water Cable 5 Polyoxyethylene Alkyl Ether 5 Water 90(6) Composition 6 (Comparative Example) Caustic Soda 4 Polyoxyethylene Alkyl Ether 5 Water 91(7) Composition 7 (Commercially Available) Product) Sulfamic acid 40 Sodium carbonate 15 Sodium salt 42 Water
Minutes 3 (8)
Composition 8 (commercial product) Chlorinated hydrocarbon 90 Surfactant lO (POE alkylphenol) (9) Composition 9 Enzyme, microorganism ・ Using the above composition ~9, the kitchen stain removal effect was evaluated and its The results are summarized in Table 1. Evaluation method 50°DH hard water 20KpK powder soap 200'f. Tempura oil 100f, soluble starch 50f1 gelatin 20? 40 tons of inorganic dirt (clay minerals) were added and mixed well, and the mixture was circulated through a transparent vinyl chloride hose with an inner diameter of 2 crn using a circulation pump. 20-24
When the model is allowed to circulate for a long time, model dirt accumulates all over the inner wall of the vinyl chloride, and this can hardly be removed by washing with water alone. This hose was cut to an appropriate length and used as an evaluation stain for kitchen stains. The above-mentioned hose was attached to the drain of a household sink to test Kosha-effective rice. For compositions 1 to 3, Parts A and B were separately injected into a drain and mixed. Composition 4.7.9 was spread around the drainage hole around 100 f, and water was poured in at 100 m/f. Compositions 5.6 and 8 flushed IOOr down the drain. Then, after 10 minutes, 1 hour, 8 hours, and 24 hours, water was run to evaluate the removal effect. ◎: 60-100% removal ○: 30-60 parts Removal Δ: 10-30 parts Removal ×; ] 0 parts or less Removal Table 1 Example 2 Using the same composition as Example 1, bathroom stain removal effect The results are shown in Table 2. Evaluation method 50 o DH (IF) Hard water 20 to 9 powder soap 20 Of. ; 1 flavor folic acid (oleic acid/stearin n#=60/40
) 100F, gelatin 502 and inorganic dirt (Kanto loam layer topsoil) 50v are added and mixed, but the same as kitchen dirt +
<a t(Evaluation of Bathroom Dirt) A stain was then prepared. This was then used for evaluation in the same manner as in Example 1. Example 3 From drains in bathrooms, kitchen sinks, washrooms, toilets, etc. We asked 33 households that were experiencing strange odors or clogging to evaluate the composition 1° described in f.Composition 10 Part A: Hydrogen peroxide 5 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether 3 Fragrance 0.2 Water) 9 Lance B agent; Caustic soda 4 N B 8, - D 2 Water
Before going to bed, pour 50 f each of the above Parts A and B into the drain, pour a small amount of water into the trap, and do not drain water into the trench until the next morning. The next morning, flush the water thoroughly and check if there is any strange odor after that.
No, I judged the flow condition. The results are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Patent applicant Lion Corporation

Claims (1)

[Claims] 1. Use 0.5 to 50% hydrogen peroxide as agent A,
Contains alkaline substances, calculated as sodium hydroxide, 0.1~
A two-part foaming hard surface cleaning composition characterized in that the B agent is an alkaline agent having an alkalinity of 50%. 2. The foaming hard surface cleaning composition according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the agent A and agent B contains a surfactant.