JPH11300867A - Sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic - Google Patents

Sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic

Info

Publication number
JPH11300867A
JPH11300867A JP10109835A JP10983598A JPH11300867A JP H11300867 A JPH11300867 A JP H11300867A JP 10109835 A JP10109835 A JP 10109835A JP 10983598 A JP10983598 A JP 10983598A JP H11300867 A JPH11300867 A JP H11300867A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sandwich board
resin
material layer
reinforced plastic
area
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP10109835A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4108179B2 (en
Inventor
Hitoshi Kodama
斎 児玉
Hidehiro Takemoto
秀博 竹本
Takumi Ishimori
巧 石森
Yoshiharu Numata
喜春 沼田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chiyoda Corp
Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd
Chiyoda Chemical Engineering and Construction Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Chiyoda Corp
Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd
Chiyoda Chemical Engineering and Construction Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chiyoda Corp, Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd, Chiyoda Chemical Engineering and Construction Co Ltd filed Critical Chiyoda Corp
Priority to JP10983598A priority Critical patent/JP4108179B2/en
Publication of JPH11300867A publication Critical patent/JPH11300867A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4108179B2 publication Critical patent/JP4108179B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a sandwich board made of FRP enhanced in reliability by detecting a flaw part of the interface of a surface material and a core material harmful to capacity in a non-destructive manner and excellent in durability. SOLUTION: A sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic has a core material layer, a surface material layer wherein a carbon fiber reinforcing material is impregnated with a resin, a corrosion-resistant resin layer wherein a chopped strand mat is impregnated with a corrosion-resistant resin and the protective material layers provided outside these layers and obtained by impregnating a surfacing mat with the corrosion-resistant resin and the individual area of a flaw part calculated by a non-destructive test method is below 5% of the area of the sandwich board and the sum total area of the flaw parts is below 50% of the area of the sandwich board.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、繊維強化プラスチ
ック製(以下、FRP製という。)サンドイッチボード
に関する。更に詳細には、十分な耐食性を有し、信頼性
の高い機械的強度を実現したFRP製サンドイッチボー
ドに関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a fiber reinforced plastic (hereinafter, referred to as FRP) sandwich board. More specifically, the present invention relates to an FRP sandwich board having sufficient corrosion resistance and realizing highly reliable mechanical strength.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】FRP製サンドイッチボードは、その軽
量性と低コスト性から有用な構造であり、軽量、高強度
な構造を必要とする車両、航空機等には特に好適に使用
されている。
2. Description of the Related Art FRP sandwich boards have a useful structure because of their light weight and low cost, and are particularly suitably used for vehicles, aircraft, and the like that require a lightweight and high-strength structure.

【0003】このような構造で最も重要なのは、表面材
と芯材との接着の信頼性であり、この接着の信頼性がF
RP製サンドイッチボードの耐久性等に大きく影響す
る。事実上、FRP製サンドイッチボードの製造時に表
面材と芯材はいくらかの剥離部、接着強度不足部等の欠
陥部分を有し、100%完全な構造を得ることは不可能
である。ガラス繊維強化プラスチックを表面材に用い、
塗装が無く、表面材が透明である場合では、表面材と芯
材の剥離は目視でも確認出来るため、検査は比較的容易
である。しかしながら、炭素繊維強化プラスチック、ア
ラミド繊維強化プラスチック等の複合材料を用いた場
合、及びガラス繊維強化プラスチックでも着色樹脂、表
面コートを用いた場合には、材料が不透明であり、表面
材と芯材との界面を目視で確認出来ない問題点があっ
た。
The most important factor in such a structure is the reliability of bonding between the surface material and the core material.
This greatly affects the durability and the like of the RP sandwich board. In fact, the surface material and the core material during the production of the FRP sandwich board have some defective parts such as peeled parts and insufficient adhesive strength, and it is impossible to obtain a 100% complete structure. Using glass fiber reinforced plastic for the surface material,
In the case where there is no coating and the surface material is transparent, the inspection is relatively easy since the peeling of the surface material and the core material can be visually confirmed. However, when a composite material such as carbon fiber reinforced plastic or aramid fiber reinforced plastic is used, or when a colored resin or surface coat is used even for glass fiber reinforced plastic, the material is opaque, and the surface material and the core material are There was a problem that the interface of the sample could not be visually confirmed.

【0004】実際に全く欠陥の無いFRP製サンドイッ
チボードを得ることは非常に難しいことから、実用上耐
久性に支障の無い欠陥レベルを規定し、支障のある欠陥
部分を非破壊的に評価し、欠陥のあるFRP製サンドイ
ッチボードを除くことが求められているが、従来、この
ような信頼性の高いFRP製サンドイッチボードは知ら
れていない。
Since it is very difficult to actually obtain an FRP sandwich board having no defect at all, a defect level that does not hinder the durability in practical use is specified, and the faulty defect portion is evaluated nondestructively. There is a need to remove defective FRP sandwich boards, but no such highly reliable FRP sandwich boards have been known.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しょうとする課題】本発明は、性能に有害
な表面材と芯材との界面の欠陥部分を非破壊的に検出、
除去した信頼性の高く、耐久性に優れたFRP製サンド
イッチボードを提供するものである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention non-destructively detects defects at the interface between a surface material and a core material, which are harmful to performance.
An object of the present invention is to provide an FRP sandwich board which has been removed and has high reliability and excellent durability.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の要旨は、芯材層
と、炭素繊維強化材に樹脂を含浸した表面材層と、チョ
ップドストランドマットに耐食性樹脂を含浸した耐食性
樹脂層と、これらの外側にあり、サーフェーシングマッ
トに耐食性樹脂を含浸した保護材層を有する繊維強化プ
ラスチック製サンドイッチボードであって、非破壊試験
法により求めた欠陥部分の個々の面積がサンドイッチボ
ードの面積の5%未満であり、且つ欠陥部分の面積合計
がサンドイッチボードの面積の50%未満であることを
特徴とする繊維強化プラスチック製サンドイッチボード
にある。
The gist of the present invention is to provide a core material layer, a surface material layer in which carbon fiber reinforcing material is impregnated with a resin, and a corrosion-resistant resin layer in which a chopped strand mat is impregnated with a corrosion-resistant resin. A sandwich board made of fiber-reinforced plastic having a protective material layer on the outside and impregnated with a corrosion-resistant resin in a facing mat, wherein an individual area of a defective portion determined by a non-destructive test method is less than 5% of an area of the sandwich board. And the total area of the defective portions is less than 50% of the area of the sandwich board.

【0007】本発明において、発明者らは、耐久性能と
してFRP製サンドイッチボードの曲げ疲労強度を用い
れば実用時の耐久性と良く対応することを見い出した。
In the present invention, the inventors have found that if the bending fatigue strength of a sandwich board made of FRP is used as the durability performance, the durability of the FRP sandwich board corresponds well to the durability in practical use.

【0008】[0008]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明のFRP製サンドイッチボ
ードを構成する芯材層としては、比重が小さく軽量の、
望ましくは機械的強度の高い、硬質樹脂発泡体、気泡を
散在させた繊維綿体、又は木材などが挙げられる。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The core layer constituting the sandwich board made of FRP of the present invention has a small specific gravity and a light weight.
Desirably, a hard resin foam, a fibrous cotton body in which bubbles are dispersed, or a wood having high mechanical strength is used.

【0009】硬質樹脂発泡体しては、好適には、降伏
(破断)点強度で表して、圧縮、引張、曲げ及び剪断が
それぞれ、1.5kg/cm2 、3.5kg/cm2
4.0kg/cm2 、及び2.0kg/cm2 以上の機
械的強度を有し、見かけ密度70kg/m3 以下の硬質
樹脂発泡体が用いることができる。例えば、鐘淵化学工
業社製の塩化ビニル発泡体、商品名クレゲセル(登録商
標)H100やH75が好適に使用できる。
[0009] with a rigid resin foam body, preferably, expressed in yield (fracture) point strength, compression, tension, respectively bending and shearing, 1.5kg / cm 2, 3.5kg / cm 2,
4.0 kg / cm 2, and has a 2.0 kg / cm 2 or more mechanical strength, it can be apparent density 70 kg / m 3 or less of the hard resin foam used. For example, a vinyl chloride foam manufactured by Kanegabuchi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., trade name of Kregecel (registered trademark) H100 or H75 can be preferably used.

【0010】ここで、気泡を散在させた繊維綿体とは、
気体を閉じ込めたカプセル又はバルーンを繊維綿中に散
在させたもので、軽量かつ一応の機械的強度を備えた材
料である。このような材料としては、例えば、日本ユピ
カ社製の商品名:ユピカマット又はランター社製の商品
名:コアマットIIのようにポリエステル繊維綿にマイ
クロカプセルを入れたもの、又はGPP社製の商品名:
スペアマットのようにガラス繊維綿にマイクロバルーン
を入れたもの等が好適に使用できる。
Here, the fiber cotton body in which bubbles are dispersed is:
It is a material that is light and has a certain degree of mechanical strength, in which capsules or balloons containing gas are scattered in fiber cotton. As such a material, for example, a product name manufactured by Nippon Yupika Co., Ltd .: a product name manufactured by Yupika Mat or Lanter Co., Ltd .: a product obtained by putting microcapsules in polyester fiber cotton like Core Mat II, or a product name manufactured by GPP:
A material in which microballoons are put in glass fiber cotton like a spare mat can be suitably used.

【0011】本発明のFRP製サンドイッチボードにお
いて、炭素繊維強化材に樹脂を含浸した表面材層は、炭
素繊維に樹脂を含浸し、樹脂を硬化したものである。そ
の強化形態としては、炭素繊維を一方向に引き揃えたも
の、炭素繊維を製織しクロス材としたもの、炭素繊維を
ステッチしたロービングクロス、炭素繊維に接着剤を用
いてマット状に仕上げたコンティニュアスストランドマ
ット、炭素繊維を5〜50mm程度に切断した短繊維を
無定方向に分散してチョップドストランドマット等が用
いることができる
In the FRP sandwich board of the present invention, the surface material layer in which the carbon fiber reinforced material is impregnated with the resin is obtained by impregnating the carbon fiber with the resin and curing the resin. The reinforcement forms include carbon fiber aligned in one direction, carbon fiber woven cloth material, roving cloth stitched with carbon fiber, and matte finish using carbon fiber adhesive. New strand mat, chopped strand mat or the like can be used by dispersing short fibers obtained by cutting carbon fibers to about 5 to 50 mm in an indeterminate direction.

【0012】本発明の表面材層に用いる樹脂としては、
不飽和ポリエステル樹脂、ビニルエステル樹脂、エポキ
シ樹脂、フラン樹脂、フェノール樹脂等の既知の樹脂を
用いることができる。本発明では、通常、後述する耐食
性樹脂層と同じ樹脂を表面材層に用いる。これにより耐
食性が向上する。
The resin used for the surface material layer of the present invention includes:
Known resins such as unsaturated polyester resin, vinyl ester resin, epoxy resin, furan resin, and phenol resin can be used. In the present invention, the same resin as the corrosion-resistant resin layer described later is usually used for the surface material layer. Thereby, corrosion resistance is improved.

【0013】本発明のFRP製サンドイッチボードにお
いては、表面材層の外側表面に、チョップドストランド
マットに耐食性樹脂を含浸した耐食性樹脂層を設けるこ
とが必要である。
In the FRP sandwich board of the present invention, it is necessary to provide a corrosion-resistant resin layer obtained by impregnating a chopped strand mat with a corrosion-resistant resin on the outer surface of the surface material layer.

【0014】ここで、チョップドストランドマットと
は、強化繊維を5〜50mm程度に切断した短繊維を無
定方向に均一に分散させ、接着剤にて接着させた薄いマ
ットを意味する。
Here, the chopped strand mat means a thin mat in which staple fibers obtained by cutting reinforcing fibers to about 5 to 50 mm are uniformly dispersed in an indeterminate direction and adhered with an adhesive.

【0015】本発明で耐食性樹脂層に含浸する耐食性樹
脂としては、本発明のFRP製サンドイッチボードが接
触する流体等に対して所定の耐食性を有する樹脂、例え
ば、不飽和ポリエステル樹脂、ビニルエステル樹脂、エ
ポキシ樹脂、フラン樹脂、フェノール樹脂等の既知の樹
脂を挙げることができる。
As the corrosion-resistant resin impregnated in the corrosion-resistant resin layer in the present invention, a resin having a predetermined corrosion resistance to a fluid or the like contacted by the FRP sandwich board of the present invention, for example, an unsaturated polyester resin, a vinyl ester resin, Known resins such as an epoxy resin, a furan resin, and a phenol resin can be used.

【0016】本発明においては、耐食性樹脂層の外側表
面に、サーフェーシングマットに上述の耐食性樹脂を含
浸した保護材層を形成することが必要である。
In the present invention, it is necessary to form, on the outer surface of the corrosion-resistant resin layer, a protective material layer in which the above-mentioned corrosion-resistant resin is impregnated in a surfacing mat.

【0017】サーフェーシングマットは、表面材層の外
側表面に樹脂リッチな層を設けるために使用されるマッ
ト等の不織布であり、旭ファイバーグラス社製グラスロ
ン等が好適に用いられる。
The surfacing mat is a nonwoven fabric such as a mat used for providing a resin-rich layer on the outer surface of the surface material layer, and Glaslon manufactured by Asahi Fiberglass Corporation is preferably used.

【0018】本発明において、芯材層、表面材層、耐食
性樹脂層及び保護層を積層して、FRP製サンドイッチ
ボードとする成型方法、或いは接着方法について、特に
限定するものではないが、本発明のFRP製サンドイッ
チボードが特徴とする高信頼性を奏するためには、非破
壊試験により求めた欠陥部分の個々の面積がサンドイッ
チボードの面積の5%未満、好ましくは3%未満、より
好ましくは2.6%未満であり、且つ欠陥部分の面積合
計がサンドイッチボードの面積の50%未満、好ましく
は40%未満、より好ましくは25%未満であることが
耐久性に優れ、信頼性の高いFRP製サンドイッチボー
ドとする上で必要である。本発明で欠陥部分というの
は、FRP製サンドイッチボードの芯材層と表面材層の
間の剥離部、接着強度不足部等をいう
In the present invention, there is no particular limitation on a molding method or a bonding method in which a core material layer, a surface material layer, a corrosion-resistant resin layer and a protective layer are laminated to form an FRP sandwich board. In order to achieve the high reliability characteristic of the FRP sandwich board, the individual area of the defective portion determined by the nondestructive test is less than 5%, preferably less than 3%, more preferably less than 2% of the area of the sandwich board. Less than 0.6%, and the total area of the defective portions is less than 50%, preferably less than 40%, and more preferably less than 25% of the area of the sandwich board. Necessary for making a sandwich board. In the present invention, the defective portion means a peeled portion between the core material layer and the surface material layer of the FRP sandwich board, a portion having insufficient adhesive strength, and the like.

【0019】本発明のFRP製サンドイッチボードの非
破壊試験法としては、FRP製サンドイッチボード中の
欠陥部分の面積を測定することができればよく、特に限
定はしないが、従来から公知のX線法、レーザホログラ
フィー法、アコースチックエミッション法、超音波法、
又はタッピング法等を用いることができる。
The non-destructive test method of the FRP sandwich board of the present invention is not particularly limited as long as the area of a defective portion in the FRP sandwich board can be measured. Laser holography method, acoustic emission method, ultrasonic method,
Alternatively, a tapping method or the like can be used.

【0020】その中でもFRP製サンドイッチボードを
軽く打撃してその反発係数の差により表面材層と芯材層
の界面特性を特定し、健全な部分と不健全な部分を差別
化するタッピング法、又は、FRP製サンドイッチボー
ドに超音波をあて、欠陥部分からの反射により表面材層
と芯材層の界面特性を特定し、健全な部分と不健全な部
分を差別化する超音波法が、多くのケースにおいて有効
且つ実用的であり特に好ましい。
Among them, a tapping method of tapping an FRP sandwich board lightly to identify the interface characteristics between the surface material layer and the core material layer based on the difference in the coefficient of restitution, and to differentiate a sound part from an unhealthy part, or The ultrasonic method of applying ultrasonic waves to a sandwich board made of FRP, specifying the interface characteristics between the surface material layer and the core material layer by reflection from a defective portion, and differentiating a sound portion from an unhealthy portion, has been widely used. It is effective and practical in the case and is particularly preferred.

【0021】所望の板厚で非破壊試験によって欠陥部分
の面積を正確に測定するには、前もって、同じ板厚のF
RP製サンドイッチボードの成形時に芯材層と表面材層
との間に任意の大きさの油含浸紙又はプラスチックフィ
ルムを挟み込み人工的に欠陥部分を入れた供試体を用
い、測定条件を調整しておくことが肝要である。
In order to accurately measure the area of a defective portion by a non-destructive test at a desired thickness, it is necessary to previously measure F area having the same thickness.
Adjust the measurement conditions by using a specimen in which an oil-impregnated paper or plastic film of any size is inserted between the core material layer and the surface material layer during molding of the RP sandwich board and an artificially defective portion is inserted. It is important to keep it.

【0022】非破壊試験を行うピッチが有害な剥離寸法
以下のピッチであれば、より信頼性高く繊維強化プラス
チック製サンドイッチボードの評価を行うことができる
ので好ましい。
It is preferable that the pitch at which the nondestructive test is performed has a pitch equal to or less than a harmful peeling size, because the sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic can be evaluated more reliably.

【0023】本発明の好適な実施態様としては、芯材層
と、FRPからなる表面材層とが、繊維マットに樹脂を
含浸させてなる接着層を介して接着、積層してなること
が挙げられる。この接着剤層は力学特性の異なる芯材層
と表面材層を強固に接着するために挿入するもので、芯
材層と表面材層間の接着性が良好な場合は必ずしも必要
ではない。ここで、繊維マットとしては上記のコンティ
ニュアスストランドマットやチョップドストランドマッ
トが好適に用いられる。ただし、繊維マットを構成する
繊維は強化繊維のように高強度高弾性率の強化繊維であ
る必要はない。接着層を構成する樹脂としては、芯材層
と表面材層を強固に接着するものであればよく特に限定
しないが、一般に表面材層と同じ樹脂であることが接着
性の向上に役立つ。
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a core material layer and a surface material layer made of FRP are bonded and laminated via an adhesive layer obtained by impregnating a fiber mat with a resin. Can be This adhesive layer is inserted in order to firmly bond the core material layer and the surface material layer having different mechanical properties, and is not always necessary when the adhesion between the core material layer and the surface material layer is good. Here, as the fiber mat, the above-mentioned continuous strand mat or chopped strand mat is suitably used. However, the fibers constituting the fiber mat need not be high-strength and high-modulus reinforced fibers unlike reinforced fibers. The resin constituting the adhesive layer is not particularly limited as long as it strongly adheres the core material layer and the surface material layer, but generally the same resin as the surface material layer helps to improve the adhesiveness.

【0024】[0024]

【実施例】以下、実施例により本発明をさらに具体的に
説明する。 (材料)FRP製サンドイッチボードの各層に使用する
樹脂以外の材料を表1に示した。実施例において各材料
は略号をもって呼ぶことにする。
The present invention will be described more specifically with reference to the following examples. (Materials) The materials other than the resin used for each layer of the sandwich board made of FRP are shown in Table 1. In the examples, each material is referred to by an abbreviation.

【0025】[0025]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0026】(樹脂組成)昭和高分子社製リポキシ#8
02ビニルエステル樹脂100重量部、ナフテン酸コバ
ルト1重量部、日本化薬社製過酸化物、商品名カヤック
328Eを配合した樹脂を用意した。
(Resin composition) Lipoxy # 8 manufactured by Showa Polymer Co., Ltd.
A resin was prepared by blending 100 parts by weight of 02 vinyl ester resin, 1 part by weight of cobalt naphthenate, peroxide manufactured by Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., and Kayak 328E (trade name).

【0027】(非破壊試験の評価)FOの上下面に用意
した樹脂を含浸しながらMを積層した。その上から所望
の厚みになるようにCに用意した樹脂を含浸しながら積
層し、次に樹脂を含浸しながらMを積層し、更にSに用
意した樹脂を含浸しながら、S/M/C/M/FO/M
/C/M/Sからなる積層構成とした。この積層物を2
5℃で5時間放置して硬化し、保護材層、耐食性樹脂層
及び表面材(S/M/C/M)の厚さ4mm、全厚み3
0mmのFRP製サンドイッチボードを得た。
(Evaluation of Nondestructive Test) M was laminated while impregnating the prepared resin on the upper and lower surfaces of the FO. From above, lamination is performed while impregnating the resin prepared in C to a desired thickness, then M is laminated while impregnating the resin, and S / M / C is further impregnated with the resin prepared in S. / M / FO / M
/ C / M / S. This laminate is
It is cured by leaving it at 5 ° C. for 5 hours, and the protective material layer, the corrosion-resistant resin layer and the surface material (S / M / C / M) have a thickness of 4 mm and a total thickness of 3
A 0 mm FRP sandwich board was obtained.

【0028】上記の積層の途中で、MとFOの間に10
0、150、200、250mmφに切った厚み0.1
mmの油含浸紙を挿入しておき、剥離直径100、15
0、200、250mmφの人工剥離をいれたモデルF
RP製サンドイッチボードを作製した。
In the middle of the above-mentioned lamination, between M and FO, 10
Thickness 0.1 cut to 0, 150, 200, 250 mmφ
mm oil-impregnated paper is inserted and the peeling diameter is 100, 15
Model F with artificial peeling of 0, 200, 250 mmφ
An RP sandwich board was produced.

【0029】また、Cの積層枚数を4、6、8、10、
及び12枚に変更し、表面材(S/M/C/M)厚さ
6、8、10、12、14mmのFRP製サンドイッチ
ボードをそれぞれ得た。
Further, the number of laminated layers of C is 4, 6, 8, 10,
And 12 sheets, and FRP sandwich boards having surface material (S / M / C / M) thicknesses of 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 mm were obtained.

【0030】(1)タッピング法 上記の様にして製作したFRP製サンドイッチボードを
タッピング非破壊試験装置(三井造船社製WOODPE
CKER WP−631)を用いてタッピングピッチ2
0mmで測定した。その結果を表2に示した。この評価
結果よりタッピング法での表面材厚さに応じた剥離に対
する感度が判明した。すなわち、表面材厚さ8mm以下
であれば有害である200mmφの大きさの剥離が検出
できることが判明した。
(1) Tapping method A non-destructive tapping test device (WOODPE manufactured by Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.) was used for the FRP sandwich board manufactured as described above.
Tapping pitch 2 using CKER WP-631)
It was measured at 0 mm. The results are shown in Table 2. From this evaluation result, the sensitivity to peeling according to the surface material thickness in the tapping method was found. That is, it has been found that a harmful peeling of 200 mmφ can be detected if the surface material thickness is 8 mm or less.

【0031】[0031]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0032】(2)超音波法 上記の様にして製作したFRP製サンドイッチボードを
超音波非破壊試験装置(NDT system社製 Q
UANTUM QBT−2+)を用いてピッチ20mm
で測定した。その結果を表3に示した。この評価結果よ
り超音波法での表面材厚さに応じた剥離に対する感度が
判明した。すなわち、表面材厚さ12mm以下であれば
有害である200mmφの大きさの剥離が検出できるこ
とが判明した。
(2) Ultrasonic method The sandwich board made of FRP manufactured as described above was subjected to an ultrasonic non-destructive test apparatus (Q made by NDT system).
20mm pitch using UANTUM QBT-2 +)
Was measured. Table 3 shows the results. From this evaluation result, the sensitivity to peeling according to the surface material thickness in the ultrasonic method was found. That is, it has been found that a harmful peeling of 200 mmφ can be detected if the surface material thickness is 12 mm or less.

【0033】[0033]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0034】(実施例)1000×1200mmのFO
を用意し、その上に40mmφに切った厚み0.1mm
の油含浸紙を重ならないように478枚ランダムに配置
し、その上からCに用意した樹脂を含浸しながら積層
し、さらに樹脂を含浸しながらMを積層した。FOの逆
の面には油含浸紙を配置せず樹脂を含浸しながらM、
C、M及びSを順に積層し、S/M/C/M/FO/M
/C/M/Sからなる積層構成とした。
(Example) 1000 × 1200 mm FO
Prepared and cut on it to a thickness of 40 mmφ 0.1 mm
Of the 478 oil-impregnated papers were arranged at random so as not to overlap with each other, and laminated thereon while impregnating the resin prepared in C, and further laminated M while impregnating the resin. M, while impregnating resin without oil-impregnated paper on the opposite side of the FO
C, M and S are laminated in order, and S / M / C / M / FO / M
/ C / M / S.

【0035】この積層物を25℃で5時間放置して硬化
し、保護材層、耐食性樹脂層及び表面材(S/M/C/
M)厚さ3mm、全厚み30mm、剥離大きさ40mm
φ、剥離部面積比が50%のFRP製サンドイッチボー
ドを得た。
The laminate was cured by leaving it at 25 ° C. for 5 hours, and the protective material layer, the corrosion-resistant resin layer and the surface material (S / M / C /
M) Thickness 3 mm, total thickness 30 mm, peel size 40 mm
An FRP sandwich board having a φ and a peeling area ratio of 50% was obtained.

【0036】このFRP製サンドイッチボードを100
×1200mmの曲げ疲労試験片に切り分けた後、すべ
ての試験片に対して、スパン/板厚=30で片振り3点
曲げにより疲労試験を実施した。応力−繰り返し回数試
験の結果(最高値及び最低値)を図1に示した。
This FRP sandwich board was used for 100
After being cut into × 1200 mm bending fatigue test pieces, all the test pieces were subjected to a fatigue test by oscillating three-point bending at span / plate thickness = 30. FIG. 1 shows the results (highest value and lowest value) of the stress-repetition number test.

【0037】FOとMの間にランダムに配置する油含浸
紙の大きさ(40、100、及び200mmφ)と配置
する枚数を変化し、上記のようにFRP製サンドイッチ
ボードを成形して、剥離大きさ−剥離部面積比が、それ
ぞれ40mmφ−10%、100mmφ−10%、10
0mmφ−50%、200mmφ−10%、及び200
mmφ−50%のFRP製サンドイッチボードを得た。
更に油含浸紙を配置しないFRP製サンドイッチボード
を成形した。これらのFRP製サンドイッチボードに対
して上記と同様にして3点曲げにより疲労試験を実施
し、応力−繰り返し回数試験の結果(最高値及び最低
値)を図1に併せて示した。
The size (40, 100, and 200 mmφ) of the oil-impregnated paper randomly arranged between the FO and the M and the number of the oil-impregnated papers were changed. The area ratio of the peeled part is 40 mmφ-10%, 100 mmφ-10%, 10 mm, respectively.
0mmφ-50%, 200mmφ-10%, and 200
A mmφ-50% FRP sandwich board was obtained.
Further, a sandwich board made of FRP without oil-impregnated paper was formed. A fatigue test was performed on these FRP sandwich boards by three-point bending in the same manner as described above, and the results (highest value and lowest value) of the stress-repetition number test are also shown in FIG.

【0038】この結果からFRP製サンドイッチボード
の疲労強度の低下は、非破壊試験により求めた欠陥部分
の個々の面積がサンドイッチボードの面積の2.6%の
200mmφ、且つ欠陥部分の面積合計がサンドイッチ
ボードの面積の50%以上となると急激に低下すること
が判明した。
From these results, the decrease in the fatigue strength of the sandwich board made of FRP was caused by the fact that the individual area of the defective portion determined by the nondestructive test was 200% of 2.6% of the area of the sandwich board, and the total area of the defective portion was the sandwich. It has been found that when the area is 50% or more of the board area, it rapidly decreases.

【0039】[0039]

【発明の効果】本発明のFRP製サンドイッチボード
は、性能に有害な表面材と芯材との界面の剥離を非破壊
的に検出、除外しているので、信頼性の高く、耐久性に
優れたFRP製サンドイッチボードとなる。
The FRP sandwich board of the present invention non-destructively detects and excludes the delamination of the interface between the surface material and the core material which is harmful to the performance, so that it is highly reliable and has excellent durability. FRP sandwich board.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】 FRP製サンドイッチボードの曲げ疲労試験
の応力−繰り返し回数を示したグラフである。
FIG. 1 is a graph showing stress versus the number of repetitions in a bending fatigue test of an FRP sandwich board.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 竹本 秀博 愛知県豊橋市牛川通四丁目1番地の2 三 菱レイヨン株式会社豊橋事業所内 (72)発明者 石森 巧 愛知県豊橋市牛川通四丁目1番地の2 三 菱レイヨン株式会社豊橋事業所内 (72)発明者 沼田 喜春 愛知県豊橋市牛川通四丁目1番地の2 三 菱レイヨン株式会社豊橋事業所内 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Hidehiro Takemoto 4-1, Ushikawa-dori, Toyohashi-shi, Aichi Pref. Inside the Toyohashi Works of Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Takumi Ishimori 4-1-1 Ushikawa-dori, Toyohashi-shi, Aichi Prefecture (2) Inventor Yoshiharu Numata 4-1-1 Ushikawa-dori, Toyohashi-shi, Aichi Prefecture Inside the Toyohashi office

Claims (4)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 芯材層と、炭素繊維強化材に樹脂を含浸
した表面材層と、チョップドストランドマットに耐食性
樹脂を含浸した耐食性樹脂層と、これらの外側にあり、
サーフェーシングマットに耐食性樹脂を含浸した保護材
層を有する繊維強化プラスチック製サンドイッチボード
であって、非破壊試験法により求めた欠陥部分の個々の
面積がサンドイッチボードの面積の5%未満であり、且
つ欠陥部分の面積合計がサンドイッチボードの面積の5
0%未満であることを特徴とする繊維強化プラスチック
製サンドイッチボード。
1. A core material layer, a surface material layer obtained by impregnating a carbon fiber reinforcing material with a resin, a corrosion-resistant resin layer obtained by impregnating a chopped strand mat with a corrosion-resistant resin,
A fiber reinforced plastic sandwich board having a protective material layer impregnated with a corrosion resistant resin in a surfacing mat, wherein the area of each defective portion determined by a non-destructive test method is less than 5% of the area of the sandwich board, and The total area of the defective part is 5 of the area of the sandwich board.
A sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic, which is less than 0%.
【請求項2】 上記芯材層と表面材層とが、繊維マット
に樹脂を含浸させてなる接着層を介して接着、積層して
なることを特徴とする請求項1記載の繊維強化プラスチ
ック製サンドイッチボード。
2. The fiber reinforced plastic according to claim 1, wherein the core material layer and the surface material layer are bonded and laminated via an adhesive layer obtained by impregnating a fiber mat with a resin. Sandwich board.
【請求項3】 上記非破壊試験法が、タッピングによる
繊維強化プラスチック製サンドイッチボード表面の局所
的な反発係数の差異により上記欠陥部分を知る試験法で
あることを特徴とする請求項1又は請求項2記載の繊維
強化プラスチック製サンドイッチボード。
3. The non-destructive test method according to claim 1, wherein said defective portion is detected by a difference in a local coefficient of restitution of the surface of the sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic by tapping. 2. The sandwich board made of fiber-reinforced plastic according to 2.
【請求項4】 上記非破壊試験法が、各層からの超音波
の反射の差異により上記欠陥部分を知る試験法であるこ
とを特徴とする請求項1又は請求項2項記載の繊維強化
プラスチック製サンドイッチボード。
4. The fiber reinforced plastic according to claim 1, wherein said non-destructive test method is a test method in which said defective portion is detected by a difference in reflection of ultrasonic waves from each layer. Sandwich board.
JP10983598A 1998-04-20 1998-04-20 Evaluation method of fiber reinforced plastic sandwich board Expired - Fee Related JP4108179B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP10983598A JP4108179B2 (en) 1998-04-20 1998-04-20 Evaluation method of fiber reinforced plastic sandwich board

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP10983598A JP4108179B2 (en) 1998-04-20 1998-04-20 Evaluation method of fiber reinforced plastic sandwich board

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11300867A true JPH11300867A (en) 1999-11-02
JP4108179B2 JP4108179B2 (en) 2008-06-25

Family

ID=14520421

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP10983598A Expired - Fee Related JP4108179B2 (en) 1998-04-20 1998-04-20 Evaluation method of fiber reinforced plastic sandwich board

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4108179B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11300870A (en) * 1998-04-20 1999-11-02 Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd Sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic
CN109725060A (en) * 2019-01-31 2019-05-07 中国民用航空飞行学院 One kind being based on the cured real time monitoring ultrasound wave system of Joule heat and monitoring method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11300870A (en) * 1998-04-20 1999-11-02 Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd Sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic
CN109725060A (en) * 2019-01-31 2019-05-07 中国民用航空飞行学院 One kind being based on the cured real time monitoring ultrasound wave system of Joule heat and monitoring method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4108179B2 (en) 2008-06-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bieniaś et al. Low-energy impact behaviour and damage characterization of carbon fibre reinforced polymer and aluminium hybrid laminates
Hosur et al. Experimental investigations on the response of stitched/unstitched woven S2-glass/SC15 epoxy composites under single and repeated low velocity impact loading
Adams et al. A review of defect types and nondestructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints
Siriruk et al. Degradation in fatigue behavior of carbon fiber–vinyl ester based composites due to sea environment
Majerski et al. The comparison of effects of hygrothermal conditioning on mechanical properties of fibre metal laminates and fibre reinforced polymers
Fatima et al. Influence of interfacial adhesive on impact and post-impact behaviors of CFRP/end-grain balsawood sandwich composites
Burman Fatigue crack initiation and propagation in sandwich structures
Zhou Prediction of impact damage thresholds of glass fibre reinforced laminates
Imielińska et al. Effects of manufacturing and face/core bonding on impact damage in glass/polyester–PVC foam core sandwich panels
Barsotti et al. Recent industrial developments of marine composites limit states and design approaches on strength
Kakakasery et al. Cure cycle effect on impact resistance under elevated temperatures in carbon prepreg laminates investigated using acoustic emission
Bhatia et al. The role of patch-parent configurations on the tensile response of patch repaired carbon/epoxy laminates
US4917938A (en) Fiber reinforced article capable of revealing damage due to surface impacts and method of making same
Cawley et al. Defect types and non-destructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints
JPS61265565A (en) Method for forming standard flaw for non-destructive inspection
Adams et al. Defect types and non-destructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints
Grabovac et al. Composite reinforcement of a ship superstructure—project overview
Saravanakumar et al. Quasi-static indentation behavior of GFRP with milled glass fiber filler monitored by acoustic emission
JPH11300867A (en) Sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic
JPH11300870A (en) Sandwich board made of fiber reinforced plastic
Cantwell et al. The influence of water immersion on skin-core debonding in GFRP-balsa sandwich structures
Singh et al. Flexural and impact properties of stainless steel based glass fibre reinforced fibre metal laminate under hygrothermal conditioning
Abdellaoui et al. Failure mechanisms of fiber composites
Martin et al. Prediction of the fatigue strength of bonded joints between multi-directional laminates of CFRP
Angelopoulos Damage detection and damage evolution monitoring of composite materials for naval applications using acoustic emission testing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050408

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060620

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060818

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20060818

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20071002

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20071116

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080325

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20080402

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110411

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130411

Year of fee payment: 5

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130411

Year of fee payment: 5

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130411

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140411

Year of fee payment: 6

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees