JPH1063407A - Operability estimating method of coordinate input device - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an operability estimating method of a coordinate input device which can relatively show whether decision is good or bad without depending on an operator's sense. SOLUTION: This device is provided with an estimated coordinate input device and a signal processing part which has a display part that is connected to a coordinate input device, and this method shows the coordinate position of a coordinate input device by a cursor 6 and is composed of a 1st step which shows a start button 7 on the display part, a 2nd step which shows a 1st target 5 by a cursor operation of the button 7, a 3rd step which erases a 1st target 5 by the cursor operation and shows a 2nd target, a 4th step which similarly erases the target 5 on display by the cursor operation and shows a new target 5, and a 5th step which shows an operational work time and the number of operation mistakes at the time of operating each target 5 by the cursor 6 when display of new targets reaches a prescribed number.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device, and more particularly, to a coordinate input device capable of expressing the operability of a coordinate input device such as a mouse or a stick pointer by an objective numerical value. The present invention relates to an apparatus operability evaluation method.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Generally, coordinate input devices such as a mouse and a stick pointer are widely used together with a keyboard and the like as operation input devices in a signal processing device such as a personal computer.

A coordinate input device such as a mouse or a stick pointer is operated by an operator's hand as necessary to input data and the like, so that the operability must be good.

Conventionally, a method of determining the operability of a coordinate input device such as a mouse or a stick pointer (a method of evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device) is performed by an operator by inputting coordinates of a mouse or a stick pointer. The device is actually operated, and based on the feeling of the operator, the quality of the operation is determined by checking the good follow-up property at the time of operation and the ease of operation.

[0005]

The above-described known operability evaluation method for a coordinate input device such as a mouse or a stick pointer is based on a state in which an operator actually operates a coordinate input device such as a mouse or a stick pointer. Since the quality judgment is performed based on the feeling of the operator, the comparison criterion at the time of judgment has to be ambiguous, and the judgment of the quality is scattered by the operator, and a uniform and accurate judgment is made. There is a problem that it is difficult to judge the quality.

An object of the present invention is to solve such a problem, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device which can objectively show the quality of judgment without depending on the sense of an operator. Is to provide.

[0007]

In order to achieve the above object, a method for evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device according to the present invention includes a coordinate input device to be evaluated and an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device. A signal processing unit, and an image display unit,
A first shooting test in which, after displaying one target, an operation of deleting the displayed target by cursor operation is sequentially performed for a predetermined number of targets;
Similarly, after displaying a predetermined number of targets together with their operation order on the image display section, a second shooting test in which the predetermined number of targets are sequentially changed in color by cursor operation in the operation order. Similarly, a predetermined number of icons and the like are displayed on the image display section. After displaying the drag destination of the icon, one of the drag tests in which these icons are sequentially moved to the drag destination by a drag operation is performed, and the coordinate input device is determined based on the operation time and the number of operation errors displayed last. Means for evaluating the operability of the device.

According to the above means, when the operability of the coordinate input device is evaluated, the first shooting test, the second shooting test, the operation procedure of which is determined in advance,
Any one of the drag tests is performed, and as a result, the operation work time, the number of operation errors, and the like are displayed as specific numerical values, so that the operability of the coordinate input device can be objectively expressed.

[0009]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS In a first embodiment of the present invention, a method for evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device includes a signal processing device including a coordinate input device to be evaluated and an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device. A first step of displaying a coordinate position of the coordinate input device on an image display unit by a cursor, a first step of displaying a start button for instructing start of operation on the image display unit, and operating the start button with a cursor. A second step of displaying a first target by performing a cursor operation on the first target to delete the first target, and displaying a second target at a position different from the first target.
Steps and the like, a fourth step of deleting the displayed target by operating the cursor on the displayed target in the same manner as described above, and displaying a new target at a position different therefrom, and displaying a predetermined number of new targets. When
The fifth step is to display the operation work time from the cursor operation of the start button to the end of the cursor operation of the last target, and the number of erroneous operations when the cursor is operated on each target.

In a second embodiment of the present invention, a method for evaluating operability of a coordinate input device includes a coordinate input device to be evaluated, a signal processing unit having an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device. A first step of displaying a coordinate position of the coordinate input device on an image display unit by a cursor, a first step of displaying a start button for instructing start of operation on the image display unit, and operating the start button with a cursor. A second step of simultaneously displaying a predetermined number of targets together with their operation order, a third step of operating the cursor in the first operation order to change the color of the target, and so on. The fourth step of changing the color of the target by operating the target, and changing the color of the target by operating the cursor on the target in the last operation order , It has become the fifth step of displaying and operation work time from the cursor operation of the start button until the cursor operation of the last target is completed, and the mistakes number of operations at the time of each target was cursor operation.

Further, in a third embodiment of the present invention, a method for evaluating operability of a coordinate input device includes a coordinate input device to be evaluated, a signal processing unit having an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device. A first step of displaying a coordinate position of the coordinate input device with a cursor on an image display unit, displaying a start button for instructing start of operation on the image display unit, and operating the start button with a cursor. A second step of simultaneously displaying a predetermined number of icons and their drag destinations, a third step of dragging one icon to move to the drag destination by operating an entry button of the coordinate input device, and so on. And dragging the icons in order to move them to the drag destination, and dragging and dragging the last icon And the fifth step of displaying the operation work time from the cursor operation of the start button to the end of the drag operation of the last icon, and the number of erroneous operations when dragging each icon. I have.

[0012] In a third embodiment of the present invention, the fifth step of the operability evaluation method for the coordinate input device includes:
The total moving distance of a predetermined number of icons that have been dragged is displayed together.

According to the embodiment of the present invention, when the operability of the coordinate input device is evaluated, the first shooting test is performed in the first embodiment, and the second shooting test is performed in the second embodiment. A test is performed, and in the third embodiment, a drag test is performed. In each of the first shooting test, the second shooting test, and the drag test, an operation procedure is determined in advance. When the first shooting test, the second shooting test, and the drag test are completed, the operation work time and the number of operation mistakes in those tests are displayed as specific numerical values, so that the operability of the coordinate input device is improved. Evaluation becomes objective,
There is no variation in operability evaluation by the operator.

[0014]

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a front view showing an example of the configuration of an operability evaluation device used for carrying out the operability evaluation method for a coordinate input device according to the present invention. FIGS. 2 and 3 are explanatory views showing examples of the display screen of the display unit when the first shooting test according to the first embodiment of the operability evaluation method for the coordinate input device of the present invention is performed. FIG. 2 shows an initial registration screen, and FIG. 3 shows a test execution screen.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the first shooting test in the method for evaluating the operability of the coordinate input device.

As shown in FIG. 1, a method for evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device according to the present invention includes a coordinate input device for evaluating operability, in this embodiment, a mouse 1, a personal computer (PC), and the like. An operability evaluation device including a signal processing unit 2, a display unit 3 such as a display, and a keyboard 4 serving as an input device is used. The mouse 1, the display unit 3, and the keyboard 4 are all signal processing units 2. Cable is connected.

Here, based on the flow chart shown in FIG. 4, together with the explanatory diagrams shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, FIG.
Of the first shooting test by the operability evaluation device shown in FIG.

First, when the user operates the keyboard 4 or the like to set the signal processing unit 2 to the shooting test mode, an initial registration screen as shown in FIG. At this time, the operator inputs his / her profile using the keyboard 4 or the like, displays the input content on the initial registration screen, registers the input content in the memory in the signal processing unit 2, and starts the test. I do.

First, in step S1, the operator
The size of the target used in the first shooting test and the number of targets displayed sequentially are set using the keyboard 4 or the like. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the setting of the size of the target and the number of the targets has been completed. If it is determined that the setting has been completed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S2. A test execution screen as shown in FIG. 3 is displayed on the display surface of the display unit 3, and it is determined that the setting has not been completed (N).
At this time, step S1 is repeatedly executed.

On the test execution screen, one target 5 and a cursor 6 indicating the coordinate position of the mouse 1 are displayed at the center, and the size of the target and the number of targets previously set are displayed at the top. At the bottom, an operation area such as a start button 7 and a stop button 8 and a display area such as an operation work time display section 9 and an operation error number display section 10 are displayed. At this stage, the target 5 is still displayed. It has not been.

Next, in step S2, the operator
The start button 7 is clicked using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the start button 7 has been clicked. If it is determined that the click has been performed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S3, where the click has not been performed. When it is determined that there is no (N), this step S2 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S3, the signal processing section 2 activates a built-in timer to start measuring operation operation time.

In the following step S4, the signal processing section 2 places a signal at a predetermined location (however, this location is not known to the operator) at the center of the test execution screen.
One target 5 is displayed.

Subsequently, in step S5, the operator clicks the displayed target 5 using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2
It is determined whether or not the target 5 has been clicked, and when it is determined that the target 5 has been clicked (Y), the next step S
The process proceeds to step S6, and if it is determined that the target 5 has not been clicked (N), the process proceeds to another step S8.

Next, in step S6, the signal processing section 2 deletes the target 5 displayed on the test execution screen.

Next, in step S7, the signal processing unit 2 sets the target 5 sequentially displayed on the test execution screen.
It is determined whether or not a predetermined number of clicks have been made. When it is determined that a predetermined number of clicks have been made (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S11,
On the other hand, when it is determined that the click has not been performed the predetermined number of times (N), the process returns to the previous step S4, and the processes after step S4 are repeatedly executed.

In step S8, the signal processing unit 2 clicks the target 5
It is determined whether a part other than the above is clicked. When it is determined that a location other than on the target 5 has been clicked (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S9. On the other hand, when it is determined that a location other than on the target 5 has not been clicked (N), the previous step has been performed. Returning to step S5, the processing after step S5 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S9, the signal processing unit 2 adds 1 to the count value of the number of miss operations.

Next, in step S10, the signal processing unit 2 displays the count value of the number of erroneous operations on the number of erroneous operations display unit 10, returns to the previous step S5, and repeats the processing from step S5. .

Further, in step S11, the signal processing unit 2 stops the operation of the built-in timer and stops measuring the operation work time.

In a succeeding step S 12, the operator clicks the stop button 8 using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the stop button 8 has been clicked. If it is determined that the click has been performed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S13,
If it is determined that the click has not been performed yet (N), step S12 is repeatedly executed.

Subsequently, in step S13, the signal processing unit 2 displays the operation work time measured by the built-in timer on the operation work time display unit 9, and ends the series of tests.

According to the first shooting test,
When the test is completed, the operation time required for the test and the number of operation errors during the test are displayed as specific numerical values, so that the operability of the coordinate input device can be objectively evaluated, and the operation can be performed. There is no variation in the operability evaluation by the user.

Next, FIG. 5 is an explanatory view showing an example of a display screen of a display unit when a second shooting test according to a second embodiment of the operability evaluation method of the coordinate input device of the present invention is performed. Shows the test execution screen.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the process of the second shooting test in the method for evaluating the operability of the coordinate input device.

Here, the process of executing the second shooting test by the operability evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG. 6 and the explanatory diagram shown in FIG.

First, when the keyboard 4 and the like are operated to set the signal processing unit 2 to the shooting test mode, the display surface of the display unit 3 is displayed as shown in FIG. 2 in the same manner as in the first shooting test. The initial registration screen is displayed. At this time, the operator inputs his / her profile using the keyboard 4 or the like, displays the input content on the initial registration screen, registers the input content in the memory in the signal processing unit 2, and starts the test. I do.

First, in step S14, the operator sets the size of targets used in the second shooting test and the number of targets to be sequentially displayed using the keyboard 4 or the like. At this time, the signal processing unit 2
Determines whether the setting of the size of the target and the number of targets has been completed, and if it is determined that the setting has been completed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S15, and the display unit 3
A test execution screen as shown in FIG. 5 is displayed on the display surface, and if it is determined that the setting has not been completed (N), this step S14 is repeatedly executed.

On the test execution screen, the set number of targets 11 and the cursor 6 indicating the coordinate position of the mouse 1 are displayed in the center portion, and the size of the target set in advance and the number of targets are displayed in the uppermost portion. Are displayed, and at the bottom, an operation area such as the start button 7 and the stop button 8 and a display area such as the operation work time display section 9 and the number of operation errors display section 10 are displayed.
At this stage, the set number of targets 11 has not been displayed yet.

Next, in step S15, the signal processing section 2 displays the set number of targets 11 in a matrix at the center of the test execution screen, and at the same time,
A number indicating the operation order is displayed in each target 11.

Next, in step S16, the operator clicks the start button 7 using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the start button 7 has been clicked. If it is determined that the click has been performed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S17.
When it is determined that the click has not been performed yet (N), step S16 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S17, the signal processing section 2 activates a built-in timer to start measuring operation operation time.

In the following step S18, the signal processing section 2 changes the color of the target 11 in the operation order 1.

Subsequently, in step S 19, the operator uses the mouse 1 to display the target 1 in the operation order 1 being displayed.
Click 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not a click has been made on the target 11, and if it has been determined that a click has been made on the target 11 (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S <b> 20. When it is determined that no click is made (N), another step S is performed.
Move to 22.

Next, in step S20, the signal processing section 2 returns the color of the target 11 in the changed operation order 1 to the original color.

Next, in step S21, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not all of the predetermined number of targets 11 displayed on the test execution screen have been clicked. When it is determined that the click has been performed on all of the targets 11 (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S26. On the other hand, when it is determined that the click has not been performed on all of the targets 11 (N), the other process is performed. The process moves to step S25.

In step S22, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not a part other than the target 11 has been clicked when the color-changed target 11 is clicked. Then, when it is determined that a portion other than on the target 11 has been clicked (Y), the next step S23
On the other hand, when it is determined that no part other than the target 11 has been clicked (N), the previous step S1
9, the processing after step S19 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S23, the signal processing section 2 adds 1 to the count value of the number of miss operations.

Next, in step S24, the signal processing section 2 displays the count value of the number of erroneous operations on the number of erroneous operations display section 10, returns to the previous step S19, and repeats the processing from step S19. .

Further, in step S25, the signal processing section 2 changes the color of the target 11 in the next operation order.

Next, in step S26, the signal processing section 2 stops the operation of the built-in timer and stops measuring the operation work time.

In a succeeding step S 27, the operator clicks the stop button 8 using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the stop button 8 has been clicked, and when it is determined that the click has been performed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S28.
When it is determined that the click has not been performed yet (N), step S27 is repeatedly executed.

Subsequently, in step S28, the signal processing section 2 displays the operation work time measured by the built-in timer on the operation work time display section 9, and ends this series of tests.

Also in the second shooting test, when the test is completed, the operation work time required for the test, the number of operation errors during the test, and the like are displayed as specific numerical values, so that the operability of the coordinate input device is displayed. The evaluation can be performed objectively, and the operability does not vary from one operator to another.

FIG. 7 is an explanatory view showing an example of a display screen of the display unit when a drag test according to the third embodiment of the operability evaluation method of the coordinate input device of the present invention is performed. It shows a screen.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the operation of the drag test in the method for evaluating the operability of the coordinate input device when the drag test is performed.

Here, the process of executing the drag test by the operability evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG. 8 and the explanatory diagram shown in FIG.

First, when the signal processing unit 2 is set to the drag test mode by operating the keyboard 4 or the like, the display surface of the display unit 3 is displayed on the display surface of the display unit 3 as in the case of the first or second shooting test, as shown in FIG. The initial registration screen as shown is displayed. At this time, the operator inputs his / her profile using the keyboard 4 or the like, displays the input content on the initial registration screen, registers the input content in the memory in the signal processing unit 2, and starts the test. I do. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 displays a test execution screen as shown in FIG.

On the test execution screen, a predetermined number of icons 12, an icon storage box (drag destination) 13, and a cursor 6 indicating the coordinate position of the mouse 1 are displayed at the center, and at the lower part. Start button 7
And operation areas such as a stop button 8 and the like, and display areas such as an operation work time display section 9, an operation error number display section 10, an icon total moving distance display section 14, and the like.

First, in step S29, the operator clicks the start button 7 using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the start button 7 has been clicked. If it is determined that the click has been performed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S30.
When it is determined that the click has not been performed yet (N), step S29 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S30, the signal processing section 2 activates the built-in timer to start measuring the operation work time.

Subsequently, in step S31, the signal processing unit 2 drags one of the predetermined number of icons 12 being displayed using the entry button of the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the icon 12 has been dragged. If it is determined that the drag has been performed on the icon 12 (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S32. When it is determined that the drag is not performed (N), the process proceeds to another step S37.

Next, in step S32, the signal processing section 2 determines whether or not the dragged icon 12 is being dragged. When it is determined that the user is dragging (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S33,
On the other hand, when it is determined that the drag movement has not been performed (N), step S32 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S33, the signal processing section 2 starts measuring the moving distance of the icon 12.

Subsequently, in step S 34, the signal processing section 2 determines whether or not the icon 12 has moved to the icon storage box 13. When it is determined that it has moved to above the icon storage box 13 (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S35, while when it is determined that it has not yet moved to above the icon storage box 13 (N), this step S34 is performed. Is repeatedly executed.

Subsequently, in step S 35, the signal processing section 2 deletes the icon 12 that has reached the icon storage box 13.

Next, in step S36, the signal processing section 2 determines whether all of the predetermined number of icons 12 displayed on the test execution screen have been moved to the icon storage box 13 and deleted. If it is determined that all of the icons 12 have been moved to the icon storage box 13 and have been deleted (Y), the next step S40
On the other hand, if it is determined that all of the icons 12 have not yet been moved to the icon storage box 13 and have not been deleted (N), the process returns to the previous step S31, and the processes after step S31 are repeatedly executed. .

In step S37, the signal processing unit 2 performs the dragging of the icon 1
(2) It is determined whether or not a part other than the above is dragged. When it is determined that the position other than on the icon 12 has been dragged (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S38. On the other hand, when it is determined that the position other than on the icon 12 has not been dragged (N), the previous step has been performed. Returning to step S31, step S31
The processes after 31 are repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S38, the signal processing section 2 adds 1 to the count value of the number of miss operations.

Next, in step S39, the signal processing section 2 displays the count value of the number of erroneous operations on the erroneous operation number display section 10, returns to the previous step S31, and repeats the processing from step S31. .

Further, in step S40, the signal processing section 2 stops the operation of the built-in timer and stops measuring the operation work time.

Subsequently, in step S41, the signal processing section 2 stops measuring the moving distance of the icon 12.

Subsequently, in step S42, the operator clicks the stop button 8 using the mouse 1. At this time, the signal processing unit 2 determines whether or not the stop button 8 has been clicked, and when it is determined that the click has been performed (Y), the process proceeds to the next step S43,
When it is determined that the click has not been performed yet (N), step S42 is repeatedly executed.

Next, in step S 43, the signal processing section 2 displays the operation time measured by the built-in timer on the operation time display section 9.

Next, in step S44, the signal processing section 2 displays the measured total moving distance of the icon 12 on the icon total moving distance display section 14.

Subsequently, in step S45, the signal processing section 2 displays a predetermined number of icons 12 again at the initial position, and ends the series of tests.

According to the drag test, when the test is completed, the operation time required for the test, the number of operation errors during the test, the total moving distance of the icons, and the like are displayed as specific numerical values. Operability can be objectively evaluated, and there is no variation in operability evaluation by the operator.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory view showing an example of the display screen of the display unit 3 showing the evaluation result of the operability of the mouse 1.

In the example shown in FIG. 9, when the operability of the mouse 1 is evaluated, the first shooting test of the first embodiment or the second shooting test of the second embodiment is performed three times. Is determined by performing the drag test three times, and the operation time, the number of operation errors, and the total moving distance of the icons at each test are displayed as specific numerical values on the corresponding display unit. .

As described in the first to third embodiments, the evaluation of the operability of the mouse 1 may be determined by any one of the first shooting test, the second shooting test, and the drag test. The test may be determined by a combination of two tests of a test, a second shooting test, and a drag test, or may be determined by a combination of three tests of a first shooting test, a second shooting test, and a drag test.

The operability of the mouse 1 was evaluated as follows.
It is preferable to determine by repeating at least one of the first shooting test, the second shooting test, and the drag test a plurality of times, but it may be determined by only one test.

In the first to third embodiments, the case where the coordinate input device is a mouse has been described as an example. However, the coordinate input device according to the present invention is not limited to a mouse. It is needless to say that the present invention can be similarly applied to a coordinate input device such as a stick pointer.

[0084]

As described above, according to the present invention, when the operability of the coordinate input device is evaluated, at least one of the first shooting test, the second shooting test, and the drag test is performed. , The first shooting test, the second shooting test, and the drag test each have an operation procedure determined in advance, and when the test is completed, the operation work time and the number of operation errors in the test are concrete numerical values. Since the display is displayed, the operability of the coordinate input device can be objectively evaluated, and there is an effect that the operability is not varied by the operator.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a front view showing an example of a configuration of an operability evaluation device used for implementing an operability evaluation method for a coordinate input device according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a first method of evaluating the operability of the coordinate input device according to the present invention;
When performing the first shooting test according to the embodiment,
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a display screen of a display unit.

FIG. 3 is a first diagram illustrating a method for evaluating the operability of the coordinate input device according to the present invention;
When performing the first shooting test according to the embodiment,
It is an explanatory view showing another example of a display screen of a display part.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of a first shooting test in a method for evaluating the operability of a coordinate input device when the first shooting test is performed;

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a second example of the operability evaluation method for the coordinate input device according to the present invention.
When performing the second shooting test according to the embodiment,
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a display screen of a display unit.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the operation of the coordinate input device when a second shooting test is performed in the operability evaluation method.

FIG. 7 shows a third method for evaluating the operability of the coordinate input device according to the present invention.
FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a display screen of a display unit when a drag test according to the embodiment is performed.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the operation process when a drag test is performed in the operability evaluation method of the coordinate input device.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a display screen of a display unit, which shows an evaluation result of operability with respect to a mouse.

[Explanation of symbols]

 Reference Signs List 1 mouse (coordinate input device) 2 signal processing unit (personal computer) 3 display unit (display) 4 keyboard (input device) 5, 11 target 6 cursor 7 start button 8 stop button 9 operation work time display unit 10 operation error count display unit 12 Icon 13 Icon storage box (drag destination) 14 Icon total moving distance display

Claims (4)

[Claims] 1. A coordinate input device to be evaluated and a signal processing unit having an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device, wherein a coordinate position of the coordinate input device is displayed on the image display unit by a cursor. A first button for displaying a start button for instructing start of operation on the image display unit.
Step, a second step of displaying a first target by operating the start button with a cursor, and deleting the first target by operating the cursor of the first target with a second target at a position different from the first target. A third step of operating the cursor on the displayed target to delete the displayed target, and displaying a new target at a different position from the third step, and When the display reaches a predetermined number, from the fifth step of displaying the operation work time from the cursor operation of the start button to the end of the cursor operation of the last target and the number of erroneous operations when the cursor is operated on each target. A method for evaluating operability of a coordinate input device, comprising: 2. A coordinate input device to be evaluated, and a signal processing unit having an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device, wherein a coordinate position of the coordinate input device is displayed on the image display unit by a cursor. A first button for displaying a start button for instructing start of operation on the image display unit.
A second step of operating the start button with a cursor to simultaneously display a predetermined number of targets together with the operation order, and a third step of operating a cursor on the targets in the first operation order to change the color of the target;
In the same manner as above, the fourth step of changing the color of the target by operating the cursor on the target in the operation order, and the operation of the cursor on the start button when changing the color of the target by operating the cursor on the target of the last operation Operability evaluation of a coordinate input device, comprising: a fifth step of displaying an operation work time from when the cursor operation of the last target is completed to the number of erroneous operations when the cursor is operated on each target. Method. 3. A coordinate input device to be evaluated, and a signal processing unit having an image display unit coupled to the coordinate input device, wherein a coordinate position of the coordinate input device is displayed on the image display unit by a cursor. A first button for displaying a start button for instructing start of operation on the image display unit.
A second step of simultaneously displaying a predetermined number of icons and their drag destinations by operating a cursor on the start button and dragging one icon by operating an entry button of the coordinate input device; A third step of moving the icons in the same manner, a fourth step of moving the icons to the drag destination by dragging the icons in order, and a step of dragging the last icon to move the icons to the drag destination. A fifth step of displaying an operation work time from the cursor operation of the start button to the end of the drag operation of the last icon, and the number of erroneous operations when dragging each icon. Operability evaluation method for a coordinate input device. 4. The operability evaluation method for a coordinate input device according to claim 3, wherein in the fifth step, a predetermined number of icons that have been dragged are displayed together with the total moving distance.