JPH1046195A - Detergent composition - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain a detergent compsn. which has an improved biodegradability and exhibits such synergistic effects due to ingredients contained that cleaning effects obtd. is equal to or higher than those obtd. by a conventional detergent contg. an EDTA salt or another builder by using three specific compds. as the essential ingredients. SOLUTION: This compsn. is prepd. by compounding 1 pt.wt. aminodicarboxylic acid-N,N-diacetic acid salt represented by formula I (wherein X is an alkali metal, an ammonium salt, or an amine salt; and n is 0-5), more specifically sodium aspartate wherein n is 1 or sodium glutamate wherein n is 2, with 0.01-0.5 pt.wt. glycolic acid salt represented by the formula: HOCH2 COOX (wherein X is the same as in formula I) and 1-100 pts.wt. surfactant comprising an anionic surfactant excellent in biodegradability such as a higher fatty acid salt (a trypical example being a soap), a sulfuric ester, or a sulfonate and/or a nonionic surfactant such as of a polyethylene glycol type or of a higher alcohol ethoxylate type. The pH of the compsn. is adjusted to 10-13.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a novel detergent composition, and more particularly to a detergent composition used for home or automobile use.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In recent years,
The effects of various detergents on environmental pollution have been identified. Recent trends include the conversion to zeolite and sodium carbonate due to eutrophication of rivers and lakes by sodium tripolyphosphate contained as a builder in clothing detergents. With surfactants, branched alkylbenzene sulfonates can be switched to more biodegradable linear alkylbenzene sulfonates, or even more biodegradable polyoxyethylene ether sulfates or higher alcohol ethoxylates. I have. However, this household detergent often contains a chelating agent represented by ethylenediaminetetraacetate (hereinafter referred to as EDTA) due to its performance.
There is a concern that DTA lacks in biodegradability and affects the environment. As alternatives to EDTA, various other chelating agents have been actively developed. DE-A
No. 4211713 describes a method for synthesizing aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetate and the possibility of use as a chelating agent, but has not reached a practically usable range yet. DE-A 42 40 69 6 describes the use of iminodiacetic acid derivatives in foods and the food industry with highly alkaline detergents. Is not economical because it requires a large amount of use.

JP-A-56-81399 discloses a phosphorus-free detergent composition containing glutamic acid-N, N-diacetate and an anionic surfactant and / or a nonionic surfactant, imide sulfate and palmitic acid. It has been proposed as. However, this is also a composition of a limited specific compound, and a formulation that can efficiently exhibit its performance as a chelating agent or builder in various surfactant-containing systems is desired.

[0004]

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION The present inventors have conducted intensive studies to solve the above-mentioned problems. As a result, the present inventors have found that the main components are: A) aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetates; B) glycolate; A) a detergent composition containing an anionic surfactant and / or a nonionic surfactant, particularly having a pH of 10 to 1;
The cleaning performance of the cleaning composition of Example 3 is superior to that of the cleaning composition alone due to the synergistic effect of each component. The present inventors have found that they exhibit the same or better effects as a detergent containing a builder and have excellent biodegradability, and completed the present invention.

[0005]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION A) Aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetates used in the present invention are salts of aminodicarboxylic acid obtained by substituting two nitrogen atoms of NH ₂ groups of acetic acid with two acetic acid groups. Preferably, the following general formula I

Embedded image Wherein X represents an alkali metal, an ammonium salt, or an amine salt independently of one another, and n represents a number from 0 to 5. Particularly preferably, n
= 1 aspartic acid-N, N-diacetate and n =
Glutamic acid-N, N-diacetate in the case of No. 2, and the salt is a sodium salt. Next, B) glycolate is represented by the following general formula II HOCH ₂ COOX II (wherein X represents an alkali metal, ammonium salt or amine salt, and X represents the aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetate) And the same is preferable.).

[0006] C) Anionic surfactant and / or nonionic surfactant are those generally used at present, and are preferably surfactants having more excellent biodegradability. For example, anionic surfactants include higher fatty acid salts represented by soaps, various sulfates, various sulfonates, and the like. Nonionic surfactants include those of polyethylene glycol type, higher alcohol ethoxylates, higher alcohol ethylenes. Oxide adducts and the like,
These may be used alone or in combination.

In the present invention, surprisingly, an excellent cleaning effect is exhibited by adjusting the pH of the cleaning solution to 10 to 13. This is shown in FIG. 1 and FIG.
Can be explained from the ion dissociation state at Amino dicarboxylic acids -N, N-diacetic acid are 4 basic acid, its ionic dissociation following general formula (wherein, H ₄ Y denotes an amino dicarboxylic acid -N, N-diacetic acid.)

Embedded image The above ion dissociation is explained by using glutamic acid-N, N-diacetate.

[0008]

Embedded image

As the pH is raised from a low pH, the carboxylic acid exhibits a stepwise dissociation equilibrium in the order of →→→ (where, is in no particular order). On the other hand, the ligand to metal as chelators N and -COO in the molecule ^- and (4) the expression state said more that chelating ability is strong. That is, p
H10-13. Here, in the present invention, aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetates include aspartic acid-
N, N-diacetate and glutamic acid -N, -COO N-diacetate is big chelate rings understand is almost the same value at which the chelating ability was measured per molecular weight Comparing ^- the complexing It was considered that there was a strong possibility that they were not involved. That is, it is conceivable that a common nitrilotriacetic acid salt as a chelating agent forms a complex similar to the case of forming a chelate complex. Also,
Although it is not clear, the structure of N in the molecule also becomes a salt of -NH ⁺ -at a low pH state, and the coordination ability to a metal as N decreases. At a pH of 13 or more, -N (OH)- PH 10-13
It is considered that the chelating ability is significantly increased. (Aspartic acid-N, N-diacetate. Glutamic acid-N, N-
The pKa ₄ of the diacetate is 9.8 each by neutralization titration. )

The amount of the detergent composition is 0.25 to 90% by weight of the above-mentioned surfactants.
It exerts the effect of washing by making use of the comprehensive action of permeation, emulsification, dispersion and foaming action. Aminodicarboxylic acid-N,
The N-diacetate is used in an amount of 0.01 to 1 part by weight, preferably 0.01 to 0.3 part by weight based on 1 part by weight of the above-mentioned surfactant. The effect is not changed even if there is too much. In general, a builder needs a chelating ability, and captures a metal such as Ca ²⁺ and Mg ²⁺ to stably exist the metal in water, and has an auxiliary function of a surfactant effect. The glycolic acid salt is aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetate 1
0.01 to 0.5 parts by weight, preferably 0.1 to 0.5 parts by weight, per part by weight.
The amount is from 0.05 to 0.2 parts by weight. When the amount is small, the cleaning effect is not exhibited, and when the amount is large, the effect does not change. It is considered that the glycolate exerts an effect of further stabilizing the chelate complex of aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetate in water or an effect as a builder of a surfactant. The glycolic acid salt is aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N
Although it may be added separately from diacetates, it is by-produced in the production of aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetates. Therefore, by adjusting the amount of by-products, the reaction solution can be directly added to the detergent. The desired content can be obtained by adding it, which is industrially advantageous.

The cleaning composition of the present invention has a pH of 10 to 13.
The cleaning effect can be further enhanced by keeping the cleaning temperature. The pH may be adjusted with an alkali hydroxide such as caustic soda, a mineral acid, an organic acid, or a pH buffer such as monoethanolamine. The detergent composition of the present invention is superior in biodegradability as compared with a detergent containing EDTA, or has an equivalent or superior cleaning effect as compared with detergents containing other builders currently used. Demonstrate. The use of the detergent composition of the present invention is a detergent used for home use, and in particular, in the category of liquid, slightly alkaline.
Applicable to alkaline detergents. Preferable examples include powdered and liquid laundry detergents for clothing, residential detergents, soaps, toilet detergents, bathroom tub detergents, automotive detergents, glass detergents, and the like. This detergent is pre-washed with water at a surfactant concentration of 0.5 so that it is directly applied to soil when used.
It can be used according to the intended use, such as those diluted to about 10% or those that are diluted with a large amount of water when used.

[0012]

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. The present invention is not limited by these examples. Example 1 The solubility of Ca ions was evaluated as an evaluation of detergency against inorganic soil. 2.0 g of sodium stearate, an anionic surfactant of the reagent, 4 sodium aspartate-N, N-diacetate (hereinafter referred to as ASD) synthesized by a separately known method
1.0 g of A) and 0.1 g of sodium glycolate as a reagent are weighed and placed in a 100 ml beaker, and water is added to 90 ml to completely dissolve. Thereafter, the solution is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and the volume is raised to the marked line. This is a detergent composition. 10 ml of this detergent composition and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol are weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water is added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 10 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. This was titrated with a burette containing a 0.01 M aqueous calcium acetate solution prepared in advance while stirring, and the point at which the whole became cloudy was determined as the end point. As a blank, 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol was weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH was adjusted to 10 while watching the pH meter with 10% by weight of caustic soda, and titration was performed in the same manner and the value was checked. The Ca of the cleaning composition at that pH
The per-gram amount of the chelating agent to which the chelating ability was added was evaluated in terms of CaCO ₃ by the following formula. The results are shown in Table 1.

Ca chelate capacity in terms of CaCO ₃ (mg / g) = f (A _(ml) −B _(ml) ) /
C where A is the titer of the test, B is the titer of the blank f is the factor of 0.01 M calcium acetate titrated water C is the weight _(g) / 10 of the chelating agent

Example 2 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 1 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 11 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Example 3 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 1 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 12 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Example 4 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 1 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol were weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to a 200 ml beaker to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 13 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 1 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 1 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 14 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 2 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 1 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, p was checked with 10% by weight sulfuric acid while looking at the pH meter.
Adjust to H9. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 3 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 1 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, p was checked with 10% by weight sulfuric acid while looking at the pH meter.
Adjust to H8. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Example 5 2.0 g of sodium stearate, which is an anionic surfactant of a reagent, was prepared by a known method.
1.0 g of N, N-diacetate 4 soda (hereinafter GLDA),
Weigh 0.1 g of sodium glycolate as reagent and weigh 100 ml
Add water up to 90 ml in a beaker and completely dissolve it. Thereafter, the solution is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and the volume is raised to the marked line. This is a detergent composition. 10 ml of this detergent composition, 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol
Weighed into a 200ml beaker and pour water into 100ml
And Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 10 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. This was titrated in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated.

Example 6 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 5 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 11 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Example 7 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 5 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 12 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Example 8 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 5 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 13 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 4 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 5 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 14 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 5 In a 200 ml beaker, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Example 5 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol were weighed in a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, p was checked with 10% by weight sulfuric acid while looking at the pH meter.
Adjust to H9. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 6 In a 200 ml beaker, 10 ml of the detergent composition prepared in Example 5 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol were weighed in a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, p was checked with 10% by weight sulfuric acid while looking at the pH meter.
Adjust to H8. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 7 2.0 g of sodium stearate as a reagent anionic surfactant and 1.0 g of pure EDTA4 soda as a reagent were weighed, placed in a 100 ml beaker, and filled with water up to 90 ml to completely dissolve. Thereafter, the solution is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and the volume is raised to the marked line. This is a detergent composition. 10 ml of this detergent composition and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol are weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water is added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 10 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. This was titrated in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 8 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Comparative Example 7 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol were weighed in a 200 ml beaker in a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 11 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 9 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Comparative Example 7 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 12 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 10 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Comparative Example 7 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 13 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 11 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Comparative Example 7 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, the pH is adjusted to 14 with 10% by weight of caustic soda while watching the pH meter. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 12 Similarly, 10 ml of the cleaning composition prepared in Comparative Example 7 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, p was checked with 10% by weight sulfuric acid while looking at the pH meter.
Adjust to H9. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 13 Similarly, 10 ml of the detergent composition prepared in Comparative Example 7 and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol in a 200 ml beaker were put into a 200 ml beaker, and water was added to make 100 ml. Thereafter, p was checked with 10% by weight sulfuric acid while looking at the pH meter.
Adjust to H8. The titration was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Examples 14 to 20 2.0 g of sodium stearate as a reagent anionic surfactant and sodium tripolyphosphate (STP) as a reagent
1.0 g of P) is weighed as a pure component, placed in a 100 ml beaker, filled with water up to 90 ml, and completely dissolved. Then 1
Transfer the solution to a 00 ml volumetric flask and scale up to the marked line. This is a detergent composition. This cleaning composition is
0 ml, 200 ml of 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol
Weigh out into a beaker and make up to 100 ml with water. Thereafter, the pH was adjusted to 1 with a 10% by weight caustic soda while watching the pH meter.
Set to 0. This was titrated in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. The results are shown in Table 1. Moreover, it carried out similarly to Comparative Examples 8-13, changing pH. The results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Examples 21-27 2.0 g of sodium stearate as a reagent anionic surfactant and 1.0 g of zeolite as a reagent in pure components were weighed and placed in a 100 ml beaker, and water was added to 90 ml and completely dissolved. . Thereafter, the solution is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and the volume is raised to the marked line. This is a detergent composition.
10 ml of this detergent composition and 10 ml of isopropyl alcohol are weighed into a 200 ml beaker, and water is added thereto.
Make it 00 ml. Then, p with 10% by weight of caustic soda
Adjust to pH 10 while watching the H meter. This was titrated in the same manner as in Example 1, and the chelating ability was calculated. Table 1 shows the results
It was shown to. Moreover, it carried out similarly to Comparative Examples 8-13, changing pH. The results are shown in Table 1.

[0036]

[Table 1]

Examples 9 to 11 Comparative Examples 28 to 30 In order to compare the cleaning performance against oil stains, the degree of cleaning of the stained plate adjusted by using a Leannut improved detergency tester was visually evaluated. In the test, the following stain plates and cleaning agents were prepared in advance. (Equipment conforms to JIS K 3370)

(Adjustment of Soil Plate) Soil Bath Tallow 10 g Soybean oil 10 g Monoolein 0.25 g Oil Red 0.1 g Chloroform 60 ml Dip a microscope slide glass in the above soil bath and air-dry to uniformly remove dirt. Create a dirty board. Only those with an amount of contamination of 0.14 ± 0.10 g per sheet are used for the test.

(Preparation of Cleaning Agent) A cleaning agent having the following composition was prepared.

[Table 2]

(Test Method) 1.5 g of each cleaning agent was dissolved in water to make 1 liter, and the pH was adjusted with a 10% by weight aqueous solution of caustic soda or an aqueous solution of sulfuric acid of the same concentration to prepare washing water.
Set the adjusted dirt plate in a set of 6 pieces of the adjusted detergency tester, put 700ml of washing water and 3 at 30 ° C.
Wash for minutes. Rinse with 30 ° C pure water for 1 minute,
Air dry. This stained plate is visually observed and evaluated in the following five steps, and the average of six sheets is used as an index of the cleanability. 5: Nearly colorless and transparent, almost stains are removed. 4: Slightly or partially reddish. 3: Although red color is clearly observed, about half of the stains are removed compared to before the washing. 2: Stain removal in the middle level between 3 and 2. 1: The cleaning effect is low to the extent that a little or partial dirt has been removed compared to before cleaning.

(Result)

[Table 3]

Examples 12 to 14 Comparative Examples 31 to 33 The following cleaning agents were prepared using the same cleaning tester and soiling plate as in Example 9, and the same tests as in the Examples were performed for evaluation.

(Preparation of Cleaning Agent) A cleaning agent having the following composition was prepared.

[Table 4]

(Result)

[Table 5]

Example 15 The detergent of Example 1 was adjusted to pH 7 with hydrochloric acid and adjusted to 5 with COD.
After being diluted with water to a concentration of 00 ppm and subjected to biodegradation treatment in a small three-tank series exposed-base activated sludge facility using sludge from a sewage treatment plant, after acclimation for one week, the COD in the treated water became 50%.
ppm or less, and the decomposition rate was 90% or more.

Example 16 The detergent of Comparative Example 7 was adjusted to pH 7 with hydrochloric acid, and adjusted to 5 with COD.
After being diluted with water to a concentration of 00 ppm, the biodegradation treatment was carried out in a small three-tank serially exposed activated sludge facility using sludge from a sewage treatment plant. After acclimation for one week, the COD in the treated water was 20%.
It was 0 ppm or more and the decomposition rate was 60% or less.

[0047]

EFFECT OF THE INVENTION Aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetates (among others, salts of aspartic acid-N, N-diacetate and glutamic acid-N, N-diacetate), glycolates and anionic surfactants And / or a nonionic surfactant as a main component of the cleaning composition, especially the p
By adjusting H to 10 to 13, an excellent biodegradable detergent, preferably a detergent that can be used in homes and automobiles, can be obtained.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 shows the abundance ratio of each ionic species of aspartic acid-N, N-diacetate.

FIG. 2 shows the abundance of each ionic species of glutamic acid-N, N-diacetate.

────────────────────────────────────────────────── ───

[Procedure amendment]

[Submission date] December 26, 1996

[Procedure amendment 1]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 1

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

Claims (11)

[Claims] The present invention is characterized in that the main component is A) amidinocarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetate, B) glycolate and C) an anionic surfactant and / or a nonionic surfactant. Detergent composition. 2. The cleaning composition according to claim 1, which has a pH of 10 to 13. 3. A detergent for clothing comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 4. A detergent for a house, such as a floor, a wall, or furniture, comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 5. A kitchen detergent such as a cooking range or a kitchen storage, comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 6. A soap comprising the cleaning composition according to claim 2. 7. A toilet detergent comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 8. A detergent for bathrooms and bathtubs, comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 9. A glass detergent comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 10. An automotive detergent comprising the detergent composition according to claim 2. 11. An anionic surfactant and / or a nonionic surfactant per part by weight of aminodicarboxylic acid-
Claims wherein 0.01 to 1 part by weight of N, N-diacetate and 0.01 to 0.5 part by weight of glycolate are contained per 1 part by weight of aminodicarboxylic acid-N, N-diacetate. Item 3. The cleaning composition according to Item 2.