JPH10230345A - Dividing core - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To prevent the development of deformation at a contact part of a core without bringing about the lowering the heat conductive capacity by arrang ing a clay layer of high hardness material on the mutual contact surface of the dividing core composed of high thermal conductivity body and arranging core rods composed of the same high hardness material in the center part of the dividing core. SOLUTION: The divided cores are constituted with the clad layers 3a, 3b composed of the high hardness material and the core rods 4a, 4b composed of the same high hardness material, and two-divided cores 1a, 1b are set to a prescribed temp. (ordinarily 10-40 deg.C) with the internal coolings 5a, 5b. Since the contact part is cladded with the high hardness material 3a, 3b, the development of deformation, etc., at the contact part is effectively prevented. Further, to the pressing force between mutual cores, the cores can sufficienly be born with the core rods 4a, 4b and can give the higher pressing force than the conventional method. As the high thermal conductivity body, copper, aluminum or zinc or these alloy, etc., is profitably suitable.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a split core suitable for forming a hollow portion of a resin joint such as an elbow or a socket when the resin joint is manufactured.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, steel pipes and cast iron pipes have been used as low-pressure gas pipes for supplying gas to general households. Recently, however, they are resistant to external pressures such as bending and elongation and have excellent seismic resistance. Thus, polyethylene tubing has begun to be used. In addition, a tube made of a synthetic resin such as polyethylene or vinyl chloride is used for various purposes.

[0003] In manufacturing such a synthetic resin pipe, particularly a joint such as an elbow or a socket, care must be taken to cool the whole as uniformly and quickly as possible. This is because, if there is a temperature difference during cooling, warpage, distortion, sinking (dent), etc. are likely to occur, and dimensional accuracy is likely to be reduced, and too much time for cooling leads to a reduction in productivity. is there. Therefore, as a core for manufacturing a joint such as an elbow or a socket, an iron core having relatively excellent heat removal ability is used.

When an elbow or a socket is manufactured, the core used for molding the hollow portion cannot be removed after molding as an integral product, and therefore, the core is easily pulled out and removed as a two- or three-part mold. I have to. In fact,
A two-piece core is used for manufacturing an elbow, and a three-piece core is used for manufacturing a socket.

[0005]

For example, in the case of manufacturing an elbow, as shown in FIG. 1, the cores 1a and 1 are divided into two parts at the bent part of the elbow and are symmetrical.
b is commonly used. Here, the split cores 1a, 1b
As shown in FIG. 2 (a), each of them operates with a pressing force P at a predetermined angle θ, but at this time, the tip part may be in point contact due to a slight deviation in the processing accuracy of the sliding part. In such a case, the pressing force is concentrated on the distal end portion, and “set” occurs. Also, as shown in FIG. 2 (b), during molding, a moment about the fulcrum is generated by the injection pressure due to the injection pressure. is there. When such "set" occurs, not only does the dimensional accuracy of the molded product decrease,
There is also concern about the occurrence of "burrs."

As a countermeasure for this problem, the core material is
Although it is conceivable to change to a material having higher strength (hardness), in this case, a problem arises in terms of heat removal ability.
That is, as described above, from the viewpoint of dimensional accuracy and production efficiency, it is necessary to remove heat as uniformly and quickly as possible after molding, but any material excellent in strength has a low thermal conductivity and is therefore high. It is not suitable in terms of the basic characteristics required for the core, that is, heat removal capability. In addition, in the conventional iron core, a cooling passage is provided inside to improve the heat removal ability,
Even if such measures are taken, the current situation is that it has not been able to sufficiently cope with the recent high cycle.

The present invention advantageously solves the above-mentioned problem, and effectively prevents generation of sagging or the like at the edge portion of the core contact portion without lowering the heat removal capability and hence the productivity. An object of the present invention is to propose a split mold core capable of preventing the formation of a joint having excellent molding quality.

[0008]

Means for Solving the Problems Now, in order to achieve the above object, the present inventors have attempted to clad a hardened material on the mutual contact surfaces of the split cores. Unexpected results were obtained. Further, in addition to the formation of the clad layer as described above, when a core rod made of the same high-hardness material was disposed on the core of the core, this core rod alone was sufficient for the pressing force between the cores. And can therefore withstand
As the core body, it has become possible to use a general-purpose copper alloy, or a soft good heat conductor such as aluminum or zinc, which has been considered difficult to use in terms of mechanical strength and hardness. The present invention is based on the above findings.

That is, the present invention is directed to a divided core whose main body is made of a good heat conductor, wherein a clad layer of a high-hardness material is provided on each mutual contact surface of the divided cores. A split-type core, wherein a core rod made of a high-hardness material integrated with the clad layer is also provided on the shaft core.

In the present invention, copper, aluminum, zinc, or alloys thereof are advantageously used as the good heat conductor constituting the core body. In addition, HRC is 35 as a hard material that constitutes the cladding layer and core rod.
The above materials (preferably 40 or more) are desirable. Examples of such materials include SCM-based and SKD-based precipitation hardening stainless steels (PSL: trade name of stainless steel of Hitachi Metals, Ltd.) and NAK (Daido Special Steel Co., Ltd.) )) Is advantageously suitable.

Further, in the present invention, as a method for joining the core body, the clad layer and the core rod, a cast-in method is advantageously applicable. This is because, in the case of the as-cast method, the main body, the clad layer, and the core rod can be tightly integrated, so that there is no decrease in heat transfer at the boundary surface and no intermetallic corrosion or the like occurs.

Further, when the core body and the clad layer are joined by such an insert molding method, in order to make the joining of the core body and the clad layer more tight, a dovetail fitting portion is provided on the outer peripheral portion of the joint portion. Preferably, it is provided. Here, the undercut angle α of the dovetail fitting portion is preferably in the range of 0 ° <α ≦ 60 °, and the projected area with respect to the cladding area (including the core rod portion) of the dovetail fitting portion is 10 to 50. % Is desirable.

[0013]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The present invention will be specifically described below. FIGS. 3 and 4 show schematic (cross-sectional) views of a split core for an elbow and a socket according to the present invention, respectively. The elbow core is divided into two parts, and the socket core is three parts.
It is divided. In the following, description will be made by taking an elbow core shown in FIG. 3 as an example.

In FIG. 3, the outline of the structure is common to that of FIG.
Is a clad layer made of a high-hardness material, and 4a and 4b are core rods made of the same high-hardness material. As shown in the figure, the cores 1a and 1b are set to a predetermined temperature (usually 10 to 40 ° C.) by the internal cooling 5a and 5b. The reason that the core temperature is set in the predetermined range is that if the core temperature is too high, there is a high risk of deformation after removal, and if the core temperature is too low, not only will the productivity be reduced,
This is because a molding defect called a weld occurs at the rejoined portion of the pouring metal. As is apparent from the figure, the split core according to the present invention has an advantage that the cooling water passage for internal cooling is easily formed since the core rod is present at the shaft core.

In the above state, if a molten synthetic resin such as polyethylene or vinyl chloride is supplied at a temperature of 160 to 230 ° C., conventionally, as shown in FIG. Although there was a high possibility that "sagging" would occur at the tip of the core, in the present invention, since the contact portions are clad with the high-hardness materials 3a and 3b, there is almost no such fear. Further, the core rods 4a and 4b can sufficiently withstand the pressing force between the cores, and a higher pressing force than before can be applied.

Here, if the thickness of the clad layer of the high-hardness material is too small, the above-mentioned effects are poor. Preferably, it is desirable to be about 1 to 8 mm. A more desirable thickness is 3 to 5 mm. Also,
If the size of the core rod is too large, cracks at the time of casting and casting defects such as poor adhesion will occur, so that the core material has a volume ratio of 35% or less, preferably about 20% or less by volume ratio between the core material and the main body. It is desirable to do. Nevertheless, if the diameter of the core rod is too small, the proof stress against the pressing force between the cores is insufficient. Therefore, the diameter of the core rod is desirably 5 mm or more, preferably 30 mm or more, depending on the product dimensions.

Table 1 shows the thermal conductivity, coefficient of thermal expansion, and hardness of various good heat conductive materials and various hardened materials. As long as the difference in thermal expansion coefficient is about Table 1, there is no particular problem in terms of bonding between the two at the time of pouring and in terms of heat removal ability.

[0018]

[Table 1]

In the present invention, in order to further increase the bonding strength of the joint between the core body and the high-hardness material clad layer, as shown in FIG. 5, a plurality of pigtails are provided along the outer periphery of the joint. It is preferable to provide the fitting portion 6. here,
As shown in FIGS. 6 (a), (b) and (c),
One of the materials to be joined (on the hard material side in this example)
By providing an outwardly extending hole, dent or projection to join them together, by providing such a dovetail fitting portion 6,
The degree of adhesion can be significantly increased. Further, FIG. 7 shows a modification of the dovetail fitting portion 6 collectively.

The flat shape of the dovetail fitting portion 6 will be described with reference to, for example, the case of the hole shown in FIG.
The best shape is a circle as shown in (a).
Triangles and quadrilaterals as shown in (b) and (c), and even pentagons or more polygons may be used.

Furthermore, the undercut angle α of the pigtail fitting portion
(See FIG. 6) is preferably in the range of 0 ° <α ≦ 60 °. Because the undercut angle α is 0 °
On the other hand, if the value is minus, the effect of improving the degree of adhesion due to the provision of the dovetail fitting portion cannot be obtained. A more preferable undercut angle α is 10 ° <α ≦ 25 °. The projected area ratio of the dovetail fitting portion to the cladding area (including the core rod portion) is 10 to 50% (preferably 20 to 50%).
30%) is desirable. This is because if the projected area ratio is too large, the thermal conductivity is reduced, while if the projected area ratio is too small, there is a risk that the dovetail fitting portion may be broken by thermal contraction.

[0022]

EXAMPLE An elbow resin joint was manufactured using the two-piece core as shown in FIG. 3 under the following conditions. (1) Core ・ Body material --- AC4C-T6 (Si: 7.0 wt%, Mg: 0.
T6 is tempered after solution treatment.・ High hardness material --- PSL (HRC: 38) (2) Elbow molding ・ Dimensions --- Inner diameter: 60 mm, outer diameter: 65 mm ・ Resin material --- Hard vinyl chloride (3) Casting conditions ・ Injection Temperature: 170 ° C. ・ Core set temperature: 50 ° C. As a result, an elbow with excellent molding quality without defects such as hot water can be manufactured in a production cycle of 25 seconds per piece. In contrast, when an elbow is manufactured using the same internally cooled iron core as in the present invention in the same 25-second production cycle as in the present invention, the molten resin is insufficiently solidified and deformed after release. Defective products were found at a rate of one out of five.

Although the case where the elbow resin joint is manufactured using the two-piece core is mainly described above, the same effect can be obtained when the socket is manufactured using the three-piece core. Not even.

[0024]

Thus, according to the present invention, a clad layer of a hard material is provided on the mutual contact surfaces of the split cores,
By disposing a core rod made of the same high-hardness material on the shaft core of the split core, it is possible to effectively prevent the "sag" at the core contact part without lowering the heat removal ability. Therefore, it is possible to improve the molding quality at the same time as increasing the production cycle. Further, according to the present invention, it is possible to use general-purpose copper alloys, aluminum, and zinc, which have been regarded as difficult to be used in terms of mechanical strength and hardness, and materials having even higher thermal conductivity. In this case, the heat removal ability and the productivity can be further improved.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a view showing an arrangement state of a conventional elbow split core.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a state of occurrence of “set” when a conventional core is used.

FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a two-piece core for an elbow according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a three-piece core for a socket according to the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory view of a state in which a plurality of pigeon tail fitting portions are provided along the outer periphery of the joining portion.

FIG. 6 is an explanatory view of pigeon tail fitting.

FIG. 7 is a view showing a modified example of the pigtail fitting.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a preferred planar shape of a dovetail fitting portion.

[Explanation of symbols]

1 split core, 2 injection port, 3 high hardness cladding layer, 4
High hardness core rod, 5 internal cooling, 6 pigtail fitting part

Claims (7)

[Claims] 1. A split-type core whose main body is made of a good heat conductor, a clad layer of a high-hardness material is provided on each mutual contact surface of the split cores, and a core of each split core is A core bar made of a high-hardness material integrated with the cladding layer. 2. The split core according to claim 1, wherein the good thermal conductor constituting the core body is made of copper, aluminum, zinc, or an alloy thereof. 3. The split core according to claim 1, wherein the high-hardness material constituting the cladding layer and the core rod has an HRC of 35 or more. 4. The split core according to claim 1, wherein the core body, the cladding layer and the core rod are joined by a cast-in method. 5. The split-type core according to claim 1, wherein a dovetail fitting portion is provided on a joint outer peripheral portion between the core body and the clad layer. 6. The split core according to claim 5, wherein the undercut angle α of the dovetail fitting portion satisfies the following expression: 0 ° <α ≦ 60 °. 7. The projection area of the dovetail fitting part according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the projected area is 10 to 50% of the cladding area (including the core rod part).
Is a split core.