JPH0895484A - Education apparatus - Google Patents

Education apparatus

Info

Publication number
JPH0895484A
JPH0895484A JP22790594A JP22790594A JPH0895484A JP H0895484 A JPH0895484 A JP H0895484A JP 22790594 A JP22790594 A JP 22790594A JP 22790594 A JP22790594 A JP 22790594A JP H0895484 A JPH0895484 A JP H0895484A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
question
answer
learner
learned
explanation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP22790594A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3331769B2 (en
Inventor
Kazuko Ishibashi
和子 石橋
Yuichi Kawaguchi
雄一 川口
Shinichi Tsumori
伸一 津森
Hiroyuki Yoshida
裕之 吉田
Tetsushi Kajita
哲史 梶田
Kazuyuki Imagawa
和幸 今川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Holdings Corp
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to JP22790594A priority Critical patent/JP3331769B2/en
Publication of JPH0895484A publication Critical patent/JPH0895484A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3331769B2 publication Critical patent/JP3331769B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To make it possible to realize explanation of solution along with the understanding of respective learners by forming the explanation by applying the solution which is one of solutions for questions correctly answered by the learners in the past and is most similar to the solution to be explained, in the case of explaining the solution to the learners. CONSTITUTION: Whether the answer made by the learner obtd. by an answer input means 102 is correct or not, is diagnosed by an answer diagnosing means 103. The correctly answered question is stored in a learned question storage file 104 if the diagnosis is correct answer. The result of the diagnosis is displayed for the learner by a display means 110. The question is selected by a selecting means 105 in the case of incorrect answer. The degree of similarity of the selected question and the learned question of the learned question storage file 104 is calculated by a degree of similarity calculating means 106. The learned question most similar to the question selected by a selecting means 105 is determined from the learned questions of the file 104 in accordance with the degree of similarity. The question to be applied in formation of the explanation of the answer is selected by an applied question selecting means 107. The explanation of the solution is formed by an explanation forming means 109 and is displayed by the display means 110.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、学習者の解答に対する
解法の説明生成に関する教育装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an educational apparatus for generating explanations of a solution to a learner's answer.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】幾つかの公式を組み合わせて解くような
計算問題の解法を学習者に説明する場合、教師は、学習
者が過去に正解したことのある問題の中から、提示した
問題に最も類似した問題を選択し、選択した問題と提示
した問題の関係を利用した説明で指導する。
2. Description of the Related Art When explaining to a learner how to solve a calculation problem that involves combining several formulas, the teacher is most likely to choose from among the problems that the learner has answered correctly in the past. Select a similar problem and teach with an explanation that uses the relationship between the selected problem and the presented problem.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】教師が、問題の解法を
一人の学習者に説明する場合は、従来の技術で述べたよ
うな方法で十分である。しかしながら、実際の教育現場
において、教師が指導する学習者が多数で、各学習者が
過去に正解したことのある問題もさまざまであるため、
教師が指導する解法の一説明例だけでは、各学習者に適
当な解法が指導されているとはいえない。
When the teacher explains the solution of the problem to one learner, the method as described in the prior art is sufficient. However, in an actual educational setting, there are many learners taught by teachers, and there are various problems that each learner has answered correctly in the past.
It cannot be said that each learner is instructed with an appropriate solution by using only one example of the solution taught by the teacher.

【0004】また、各学習者が過去に正解した全問題
を、一人の教師が管理する負担は膨大であり、実際は不
可能である。
Further, the burden of one teacher managing all the problems that each learner has correctly answered in the past is enormous, which is impossible in practice.

【0005】本発明は、このような状況を鑑みてなされ
たもので、学習者が解答した問題の解法説明を、学習者
が過去に正解したことがあり、かつ解答した問題に最も
類似した問題を利用して、計算機で自動生成することを
実現するものである。
The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and the problem that the learner has answered correctly in the past and the problem most similar to the problem that the learner has answered in the past has been explained. Is used to realize automatic generation by a computer.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】このような課題を解決す
るために本発明は、未習得問題格納ファイルより問題を
選択し学習者に提示し、解答入力手段より提示した問題
に対する学習者の解答を得、解答診断手段より学習者の
解答の正誤を診断し、表示手段より学習者に表示すべき
出力データを表示する教育装置に、学習者が過去に正解
した問題を格納する習得済問題格納ファイルと、問題を
選択する選択手段と、前記選択手段より選択した問題と
前記習得済問題格納ファイルに格納されている問題との
類似度を計算する類似度計算手段と、解法の説明生成に
適用する問題を選択する適用問題選択手段と、前記適用
問題選択手段より選択した問題を格納する適用問題格納
ファイルと、説明を生成する説明生成手段とを備えたこ
とを特徴とする。
In order to solve such a problem, the present invention selects a question from an unacquired question storage file and presents it to the learner, and the learner's answer to the question presented by the answer input means. The learning device stores the questions that the learner has correctly answered in the past in an educational device that diagnoses the correctness of the learner's answer with the answer diagnosis means and displays the output data to be displayed to the learner with the display means. A file, a selection means for selecting a question, a similarity calculation means for calculating a similarity between the question selected by the selection means and a question stored in the learned question storage file, and applied to generation of explanation of a solution It is characterized by further comprising an applied question selecting means for selecting a question to be executed, an applied question storage file for storing the question selected by the applied question selecting means, and an explanation generating means for generating an explanation.

【0007】[0007]

【作用】前記習得済問題格納ファイルにより、学習者が
過去に正解した問題が管理され、学習者に解法の説明が
必要な場合は、前記選択手段より選択した問題と前記習
得済問題格納ファイルに格納されている習得済問題との
類似度を類似度計算手段より計算し、前記類似度計算手
段より得る類似度の値に基づき、解法の説明生成に適用
する問題を前記適用問題選択手段より選択して前記適用
問題格納ファイルに格納し、前記説明生成手段より前記
適用問題格納ファイルに格納した適用問題を適用して、
解法の説明生成が可能となる。
When the learner's correct answer is managed by the learned problem storage file and the learner needs to explain the solution, the problem selected by the selecting means and the learned problem storage file are stored in the learned problem storage file. The similarity to the stored learned question is calculated by the similarity calculation means, and the problem to be applied to the generation of the explanation of the solution is selected from the applied problem selection means based on the value of the similarity obtained from the similarity calculation means. Then stored in the application problem storage file, and applying the application problem stored in the application problem storage file from the explanation generation means,
It is possible to generate the explanation of the solution.

【0008】[0008]

【実施例】図1〜図14を用いて、本発明の一実施例を
説明する。なお、全図を通じて同一符合は同一対象を示
すとする。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. Note that the same reference numerals denote the same objects throughout the drawings.

【0009】図1は本発明の実施例における教育装置の
システム構成を示す。図において、101は学習者に提
示する問題を格納する未習得問題格納ファイル、102
は学習者の解答を得る解答入力手段、103は解答の正
誤を診断する解答診断手段、104は学習者が過去に正
解した問題を格納する習得済問題格納ファイル、105
は問題を選択する選択手段、106は選択手段105よ
り選択した問題と習得済問題格納ファイル104に格納
されている問題との類似度を計算する類似度計算手段1
06、107は解法の説明生成に適用する問題を選択す
る適用問題選択手段107、108は適用問題選択手段
107より選択した問題を格納する適用問題格納ファイ
ル104、109は説明を生成する説明生成手段、11
0は出力データを表示する表示手段である。
FIG. 1 shows the system configuration of an educational device in an embodiment of the present invention. In the figure, 101 is an unacquired question storage file for storing questions to be presented to learners, 102
Is an answer input means for obtaining the answer of the learner, 103 is an answer diagnosis means for diagnosing the correctness of the answer, 104 is a learned question storage file for storing the questions that the learner has answered correctly in the past, 105
Is a selecting means for selecting a question, and 106 is a similarity calculating means 1 for calculating the similarity between the question selected by the selecting means 105 and the question stored in the learned question storage file 104.
Reference numerals 06 and 107 are applied question selecting means 107 and 108 for selecting a question to be applied to the generation of the explanation of the solution method. , 11
Reference numeral 0 is a display means for displaying output data.

【0010】未習得問題格納ファイル101に格納され
ている問題を学習者に提示し、提示した問題に対する学
習者の解答を解答入力手段102より得、解答入力手段
102より得る学習者の解答の正誤を解答診断手段10
3より診断し、解答診断手段103より得る解答の診断
結果が正解である場合は、正解した問題を習得済問題格
納ファイル104に格納し、解答の診断結果を表示手段
110より学習者に表示し、解答の診断結果が不正解で
ある場合は、選択手段105より問題を選択し、選択し
た問題と習得済問題格納ファイル104に格納されてい
る習得済問題との類似度を類似度計算手段106より計
算し、類似度計算手段106より得る類似度の値に基づ
き、習得済問題格納ファイル104に格納されている習
得済問題の中から選択手段105より選択した問題に最
も類似した習得済問題を決定し、決定した習得済問題を
含め、解法の説明生成に適用する問題を適用問題選択手
段107より選択して適用問題格納ファイル108に格
納し、適用問題格納ファイル108に格納した適用問題
を用いた解法の説明を説明生成手段109より生成し、
問題または解答の診断結果または解法の説明を表示手段
110より学習者に表示する。
The question stored in the unacquired question storage file 101 is presented to the learner, the learner's answer to the presented question is obtained from the answer input means 102, and the learner's answer is obtained from the answer input means 102. Answer diagnosis means 10
When the diagnosis result of the answer from the answer diagnosis means 103 is correct, the correct answer is stored in the learned question storage file 104, and the diagnosis result of the answer is displayed to the learner by the display means 110. If the answer diagnosis result is incorrect, a question is selected from the selection means 105, and the similarity between the selected question and the learned question stored in the learned question storage file 104 is calculated by the similarity calculation means 106. Based on the value of the similarity calculated by the similarity calculation means 106, the learned question most similar to the question selected by the selection means 105 from the learned questions stored in the learned question storage file 104 is calculated. The problem to be applied to the generation of the explanation of the solution, including the determined and already-acquired problem, is selected by the applied problem selection means 107 and stored in the applied problem storage file 108. Generated from description generating unit 109 a description of Algorithm Using application problems stored in file 108,
The diagnosis result of the question or the answer or the explanation of the solution is displayed to the learner by the display means 110.

【0011】図2は本発明における端末のハードウエア
構成を示す。図において、201は出力データを表示す
るディスプレイ、202は入力データを受けつけるキー
ボード、203はデータを記憶する外部記憶装置、20
4は入出力データやプログラムを一次的に記憶する主記
憶装置、205は外部記憶装置203から主記憶装置2
04に呼び込まれたシステムプログラムを実行し、20
5に接続されたディスプレイ201、キーボード20
2、外部記憶装置203、主記憶装置204の入出力動
作を制御するCPUである。
FIG. 2 shows the hardware configuration of the terminal according to the present invention. In the figure, 201 is a display for displaying output data, 202 is a keyboard for receiving input data, 203 is an external storage device for storing data, 20
Reference numeral 4 denotes a main storage device that temporarily stores input / output data and programs, and 205 denotes an external storage device 203 to the main storage device 2.
The system program called in 04 is executed, and 20
Display 201 and keyboard 20 connected to 5
2, a CPU that controls input / output operations of the external storage device 203 and the main storage device 204.

【0012】未習得問題格納ファイル101は外部記憶
装置203に記憶されており、CPU制御の下、主記憶
装置204へ未習得問題として出力される。習得済問題
格納ファイル104は外部記憶装置203に記憶されて
おり、CPU制御の下、主記憶装置204へ習得済問題
として出力される。適用問題格納ファイル108は外部
記憶装置203に記憶されており、CPU制御の下、主
記憶装置204へ解法生成適用問題として出力される。
The unacquired question storage file 101 is stored in the external storage device 203, and is output as an unacquired question to the main storage device 204 under the control of the CPU. The learned question storage file 104 is stored in the external storage device 203, and is output as a learned question to the main storage device 204 under the control of the CPU. The application problem storage file 108 is stored in the external storage device 203, and is output as a solution generation application problem to the main storage device 204 under CPU control.

【0013】主記憶装置204に記憶された未習得問題
は、CPU制御の下、ディスプレイ201に表示され
る。
The unlearned questions stored in the main storage device 204 are displayed on the display 201 under the control of the CPU.

【0014】提示された問題に対する学習者の解答はキ
ーボード202より入力され、CPU制御の下、主記憶
装置204へ出力される。
The learner's answer to the presented question is input from the keyboard 202 and output to the main storage device 204 under the control of the CPU.

【0015】解答の正誤診断、習得済問題格納ファイル
104の管理、類似度計算に必要な問題の選択、問題の
類似度計算、解法の説明生成に適用する習得済問題の選
択、適用問題格納ファイル108の管理、解法の説明生
成は主記憶装置204に記憶されたシステムプログラム
の処理手続きに従って、CPUが行なう。
Correct / wrong diagnosis of answers, management of learned question storage file 104, selection of questions required for similarity calculation, calculation of similarity of questions, selection of learned questions applied to generation of explanation of solution, application problem storage file The CPU manages 108 and generates an explanation of the solution according to the processing procedure of the system program stored in the main memory 204.

【0016】生成された解法説明は、CPUの制御の
下、ディスプレイ201に表示される。
The generated solution explanation is displayed on the display 201 under the control of the CPU.

【0017】図3は本発明における問題のデータ構造を
示す。問題は図3に示すように、求めるパラメータnの
アドレスと前提となるパラメータ1〜nー1のアドレ
ス、または既知数nのアドレスと既知数nとから構成さ
れるデータ構造を持つものとする。
FIG. 3 shows the data structure of the problem in the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, it is assumed that the problem is that the data structure is made up of the address of the parameter n to be obtained and the addresses of the parameters 1 to n-1, which are prerequisites, or the addresses of the known number n and the known number n.

【0018】図4は図3で示したデータ構造を持つデー
タを木構造で示す。本実施例の処理動作を図5に示すフ
ローチャートを用いて以下に説明する。
FIG. 4 shows the data having the data structure shown in FIG. 3 in a tree structure. The processing operation of this embodiment will be described below with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

【0019】未習得問題格納ファイル102に格納され
ている未習得問題を学習者に提示し(ステップ50
1)、提示した問題に対する学習者の解答を解答入力手
段102より得(ステップ502)、解答入力手段10
2より得る解答の正誤を解答診断手段103より診断す
る(ステップ503)。
The unlearned questions stored in the unlearned question storage file 102 are presented to the learner (step 50).
1), the learner's answer to the presented question is obtained from the answer input means 102 (step 502), and the answer input means 10
The answer diagnosing means 103 diagnoses whether the answer obtained from 2 is correct (step 503).

【0020】ステップ504において、解答の診断結果
が正解である場合は、提示した未習得問題を習得済問題
として習得済問題格納ファイル104に格納し、診断結
果を表示手段110より学習者に表示する(ステップ5
15〜ステップ516)。解答の診断結果が不正解で、
loop1(ステップ505〜ステップ513)の処理
が一回目である場合は、選択手段105より学習者に提
示した問題を選択し(ステップ506)、loop1の
処理が二回目以降の場合は、選択手段105より非共有
の部分問題を選択する(ステップ507)。
In step 504, when the diagnosis result of the answer is correct, the presented unacquired question is stored in the learned question storage file 104 as a learned question, and the diagnosis result is displayed to the learner by the display means 110. (Step 5
15-step 516). The diagnosis result of the answer is incorrect,
When the process of loop1 (steps 505 to 513) is the first time, the selection means 105 selects the question presented to the learner (step 506), and when the process of loop1 is the second time or later, the selection means 105. A more unshared subproblem is selected (step 507).

【0021】選択手段105より選択した問題と習得済
問題格納ファイル104に格納されている習得済問題に
対し、それぞれの共有・非共有となる部分問題を獲得す
る(ステップ508)。
With respect to the question selected by the selecting means 105 and the learned question stored in the learned question storage file 104, partial questions to be shared / non-shared are acquired (step 508).

【0022】ステップ508において獲得した共有・非
共有の部分問題をもとに、選択手段105より選択した
問題と習得済問題との類似度を類似度計算手段106よ
り計算する(ステップ509)。
Based on the shared / non-shared sub-problems obtained in step 508, the similarity calculation means 106 calculates the similarity between the question selected by the selection means 105 and the learned question (step 509).

【0023】ステップ509において類似度計算手段1
06より計算した類似度の値に基づき、習得済問題格納
ファイル104に格納されている習得済問題の中から、
選択手段105より選択した問題に最も類似した習得済
問題を決定する(ステップ510)。
In step 509, the similarity calculation means 1
Based on the value of the similarity calculated from 06, from among the learned questions stored in the learned question storage file 104,
A learned question most similar to the question selected by the selection means 105 is determined (step 510).

【0024】ステップ511において、決定した習得済
問題と選択手段105より選択した問題との共有の部分
問題がある場合は、解法の説明生成に適用する適用問題
を適用選択手段107より選択し、適用問題格納ファイ
ル108に格納する(ステップ512)。共有の部分問
題がない場合は、適用問題格納ファイル108に格納し
た適用問題を用いて、解法の説明を生成し(ステップ5
14)、解答の診断結果および生成した解法の説明を表
示手段110より学習者に表示する(ステップ51
6)。
In step 511, if there is a sub-problem that is common to the learned problem that has been decided and the problem that has been selected by the selection means 105, then the application problem to be applied to the generation of the explanation of the solution is selected from the application selection means 107 and applied It is stored in the question storage file 108 (step 512). If there is no shared sub-problem, the explanation of the solution is generated using the application problem stored in the application problem storage file 108 (step 5).
14), the diagnosis result of the answer and the explanation of the generated solution are displayed on the learner by the display means 110 (step 51).
6).

【0025】ステップ511において、決定した習得済
問題と選択手段105より選択した問題と非共有の部分
問題がある場合は、ステップ513からステップ505
の処理へ戻り、非共有の部分問題がない場合は、適用問
題格納ファイル108に格納した適用問題を用いて、解
法の説明を生成し(ステップ514)、解答の診断結果
および生成した解法の説明を表示手段110より学習者
に表示する(ステップ516)。
In step 511, if there is a partial question that is not shared with the question that has been learned and the question that has been selected by the selection means 105, then steps 513 to 505.
If there is no non-shared sub-problem, the explanation of the solution is generated using the application problem stored in the application problem storage file 108 (step 514), the diagnosis result of the answer and the description of the generated solution. Is displayed to the learner by the display means 110 (step 516).

【0026】以下、データ例を用いた本実施例の処理動
作の説明を行なう。図6は本実施例における学習者の未
習得問題を示しており、この問題が学習者に提示され
る。
The processing operation of this embodiment will be described below using data examples. FIG. 6 shows a learner's unacquired problem in this embodiment, and this problem is presented to the learner.

【0027】図7は図6に示した未習得問題1を、図3
のデータ構造に基づいた木構造で示しており、図8は本
実施例における学習者1の習得済問題を図3のデータ構
造に基づいた木構造で示しているものとする。学習者1
は図8に示す問題を過去に解いて正解したことがあるも
のとする。
FIG. 7 shows the unlearned problem 1 shown in FIG.
8 is shown as a tree structure based on the data structure of FIG. 8, and FIG. 8 is shown as a tree structure based on the data structure of FIG. Learner 1
Assumes that the problem shown in FIG. 8 has been solved in the past and has been answered correctly.

【0028】図7に示す未習得問題1は、未習得問題格
納101ファイルに格納されており、図8に示す学習者
1の習得済問題は、習得済問題格納ファイル104に格
納されるものとする。
The unacquired question 1 shown in FIG. 7 is stored in the unacquired question storage 101 file, and the learned question of the learner 1 shown in FIG. 8 is stored in the learned question storage file 104. To do.

【0029】学習者1に問題1を提示し(ステップ50
1)、提示した問題に対する学習者1の解答を解答入力
手段102より得(ステップ502)、解答入力手段1
02より得る学習者1の解答の正誤を解答診断手段10
3より診断する(ステップ503〜ステップ504)。
Present question 1 to learner 1 (step 50
1), the answer of the learner 1 to the presented question is obtained from the answer input means 102 (step 502), and the answer input means 1
The correctness of the answer of the learner 1 obtained from 02
The diagnosis is made from 3 (step 503 to step 504).

【0030】学習者1の解答の診断結果が正解である場
合は、問題1を習得済問題として習得済問題格納ファイ
ル104へ格納し、図4に示すような解答の診断結果を
学習者1に表示する。(ステップ515〜ステップ81
6)。学習者1の解答の診断結果が不正解である場合
は、選択手段105より問題1を選択する(ステップ5
06)。
When the diagnosis result of the answer of the learner 1 is correct, the problem 1 is stored as a learned problem in the learned problem storage file 104, and the learner 1 receives the diagnosis result of the answer as shown in FIG. indicate. (Step 515 to Step 81
6). If the diagnosis result of the answer of the learner 1 is incorrect, the question 1 is selected by the selecting means 105 (step 5).
06).

【0031】習得済問題格納ファイル104に格納され
ている習得済問題2、3、7とステップ506において
選択手段105より選択した問題1に対し、それぞれの
共有・非共有となる部分問題を獲得し(ステップ50
8)、獲得した共有・非共有の部分問題をもとに、習得
済問題2、3、7と選択手段105より選択した問題1
との類似度を類似度計算手段106より計算する(ステ
ップ509)。
With respect to the learned problems 2, 3, 7 stored in the learned problem storage file 104 and the problem 1 selected by the selection means 105 in step 506, respective shared / non-shared partial problems are acquired. (Step 50
8) Based on the acquired shared / non-shared sub-problems, the learned problems 2, 3, 7 and the problem 1 selected by the selection means 105.
Is calculated by the similarity calculation means 106 (step 509).

【0032】ステップ509において計算した類似度の
値に基づき、問題1に最も類似した問題として習得済問
題2を選択する(ステップ510)。
Based on the value of the similarity calculated in step 509, the learned question 2 is selected as the question most similar to the question 1 (step 510).

【0033】三回のloop1の処理におけるステップ
510では、計算した類似度の値に基づき、習得済問題
2、習得済問題3、習得済問題2を順次選択する。
At step 510 in the three loop 1 processes, the learned problem 2, the learned problem 3, and the learned problem 2 are sequentially selected based on the calculated similarity value.

【0034】図9は三回のloop1処理において得ら
れる、問題選択手段105より選択した問題と計算した
類似度の値によりステップ510において選択した習得
済問題との共有の部分問題および非共有の部分問題を示
す。
FIG. 9 shows a shared partial question and a non-shared partial question with the learned question selected in step 510 according to the similarity value calculated by the question selected by the question selecting means 105 and obtained in three loop 1 processes. Indicate a problem.

【0035】loop1の処理が二回目までは、選択手
段105より選択した問題と共有の部分問題があるた
め、解法の説明生成に適用する適用問題として、習得済
問題2、3を適用選択手段107より選択し、適用問題
格納ファイル108に格納する(ステップ512)。l
oop1の処理が三回目の場合は、ステップ510にお
いて類似度の値より選択した習得済問題2とステップ5
07において選択手段105より選択した問題4には共
有の部分問題がないため、それまでに適用問題格納ファ
イル108に格納した適用問題を用いて、解法の説明を
生成し(ステップ514)、図10に示す解答の診断結
果および生成した解法の説明を表示手段110より学習
者1に表示する(ステップ516)。
Until the second processing of loop1, there is a shared partial problem with the problem selected by the selection means 105, so the learned problems 2 and 3 are applied selection means 107 as the application problems to be applied for generating the explanation of the solution. It is further selected and stored in the application question storage file 108 (step 512). l
When the processing of oop1 is the third time, the learned problem 2 and step 5 selected from the similarity value in step 510
Since the problem 4 selected by the selecting means 105 in 07 does not have a shared sub-problem, the explanation of the solution is generated by using the applied problem stored in the applied problem storage file 108 (step 514), and FIG. The diagnostic result of the answer shown in and the explanation of the generated solution are displayed on the learner 1 by the display means 110 (step 516).

【0036】図11は本実施例における学習者2の習得
済問題を図3のデータ構造に基づいた木構造で示してお
り、学習者2は過去にこれらの問題を解いて正解したこ
とがあるものとする。
FIG. 11 shows the learned problems of the learner 2 in this embodiment in a tree structure based on the data structure of FIG. 3, and the learner 2 has solved these problems in the past and has correctly answered them. I shall.

【0037】学習者2に解法の説明が必要な場合、一回
のloop1処理におけるステップ510では、計算し
た類似度の値に基づき、習得済問題5を選択するが、習
得済問題5と選択手段105より選択した問題1には共
有の部分問題がないため、習得済問題5と非共有の部分
問題4を適用問題格納ファイル108に格納し、これら
の問題を用いて、解法の説明を生成し、図13に示すよ
うな解答の診断結果および生成した解法の説明を表示手
段110より学習者に表示する。
When the learner 2 needs to explain the solution method, in step 510 in one loop 1 process, the learned question 5 is selected based on the calculated similarity value. However, the learned question 5 and the selection means are selected. Since the problem 1 selected from 105 does not have a shared partial problem, the learned problem 5 and the non-shared partial problem 4 are stored in the applied problem storage file 108, and the explanation of the solution method is generated using these problems. , The explanation of the diagnostic result of the answer and the generated solution as shown in FIG.

【0038】図12は一回のloop1処理において得
られる、問題選択手段105より選択した問題と計算し
た類似度の値によりステップ510において選択した習
得済問題との共有の部分問題および非共有の部分問題を
示す。
FIG. 12 shows a shared partial question and a non-shared partial question with the learned question selected in step 510 according to the similarity value calculated by the question selected by the question selecting means 105 and obtained in one loop 1 process. Indicate a problem.

【0039】図8に示すような問題を過去に正解したこ
とのある学習者1に対しては、図10に示すような説明
を行い、図11に示すような問題を過去に正解したこと
のある学習者2に対しては、図13に示すような説明を
行うことで、各学習者に適当な解法の指導が実現でき
る。
For the learner 1 who has correctly answered the problem shown in FIG. 8 in the past, the explanation as shown in FIG. 10 is given, and the problem as shown in FIG. By giving an explanation as shown in FIG. 13 to a certain learner 2, it is possible to provide each learner with an appropriate solution instruction.

【0040】[0040]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明は、学習者に
解法を説明する場合、学習者が過去に正解したことのあ
る問題の解法で、しかも、説明する解法に最も類似した
解法を適用して説明を生成することで、個々の学習者の
理解に沿った解法の説明が実現できる。
As described above, according to the present invention, when a solution is explained to a learner, a solution to a problem that the learner has correctly answered in the past, and a solution most similar to the solution to be explained is applied. By generating the explanation by doing so, it is possible to realize the explanation of the solution method according to the understanding of each learner.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施例の構成を示す図FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】本発明の実施例のハードウエア構成を示す図FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a hardware configuration of an embodiment of the present invention.

【図3】本発明の実施例の問題のデータ構造を示す図FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a data structure of a problem in an embodiment of the present invention.

【図4】図3に示したデータ構造を木構造で示した図FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a tree structure of the data structure shown in FIG.

【図5】本発明の実施例の動作を示す図FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the operation of the embodiment of the present invention.

【図6】学習者に提示する問題の例を示す図FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a problem presented to a learner.

【図7】図6に示した問題を木構造で示した図FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the problem shown in FIG. 6 in a tree structure.

【図8】学習者1が過去に正解したことのある習得済問
題の例を木構造で示した図
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a learned problem that the learner 1 has correctly answered in the past in a tree structure.

【図9】学習者1への解法の説明生成に利用する共有の
部分問題と非共有の部分問題の例を示す図
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a shared subproblem and a non-shared subproblem used for generating an explanation of a solution to a learner 1.

【図10】学習者1への解答の診断結果および生成した
解法の説明の例を示す図
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a diagnosis result of an answer to the learner 1 and an explanation of a generated solution.

【図11】学習者2が過去に正解したことのある習得済
問題のを木構造で示した図
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing, as a tree structure, a learned problem that the learner 2 has correctly answered in the past.

【図12】学習者2への解法の説明生成に利用する共有
の部分問題と非共有の部分問題の例を示す図
FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an example of a shared subproblem and a non-shared subproblem used to generate an explanation of a solution to a learner 2.

【図13】学習者2への解答の診断結果および生成した
解法の説明の例を示す図
FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a diagnosis result of an answer to the learner 2 and an explanation of a generated solution.

【図14】提示した問題を正解した学習者への解法の診
断結果の例を示す図
FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an example of a diagnosis result of a solution method for a learner who correctly answers the presented problem.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 吉田 裕之 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 (72)発明者 梶田 哲史 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 (72)発明者 今川 和幸 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Hiroyuki Yoshida, 1006 Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Prefecture Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (72) Satoshi Kajita, 1006 Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. 72) Inventor Kazuyuki Imagawa 1006 Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Prefecture Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】学習者に提示する問題を格納する未習得問
題格納ファイルと、 学習者が正解したことのある問題を格納する習得済問題
格納ファイルと、 学習者の解答を得る解答入力手段と、 解答の正誤を診断する解答診断手段と、 問題を選択する選択手段と、 前記選択手段より選択した問題と前記習得済問題格納フ
ァイルに格納されている問題との類似度を計算する類似
度計算手段と、 解法の説明生成に適用する問題を選択する適用問題選択
手段と、 前記適用問題選択手段より選択した問題を格納する適用
問題格納ファイルと、 説明を生成する説明生成手段と、 出力データを表示する表示手段を有し、 前記未習得問題格納ファイルに格納されている問題を学
習者に提示し、 提示した問題に対する学習者の解答を前記解答入力手段
より得、 前記解答入力手段より得る学習者の解答の正誤を前記解
答診断手段より診断し、前記解答診断手段より得る解答
の診断結果が正解である場合は、正解した問題を前記習
得済問題格納ファイルに格納して、解答の診断結果を前
記表示手段より学習者に表示し、解答の診断結果が不正
解である場合は、前記選択手段より問題を選択し、前記
習得済問題格納ファイルに格納されている習得済問題と
選択した問題との類似度を類似度計算手段より計算し、 前記類似度計算手段より得る類似度の値に基づき、解法
の説明生成に適用する問題を前記適用問題選択手段より
選択して前記適用問題格納ファイルに格納し、前記適用
問題格納ファイルに格納した適用問題を用いた解法の説
明を前記説明生成手段より生成し、 問題または解答の診断結果または解法の説明を前記表示
手段より学習者に表示する手段を備えたことを特徴とす
る教育装置。
1. An unacquired question storage file for storing a question to be presented to a learner, a learned question storage file for storing a question that the learner has answered correctly, and an answer input means for obtaining the answer of the learner. , Answer diagnosing means for diagnosing whether the answer is correct, selecting means for selecting a question, and similarity calculation for calculating a similarity between the question selected by the selecting means and the question stored in the learned question storage file Means, an application problem selection means for selecting a problem to be applied to the solution explanation generation, an application problem storage file for storing the problem selected by the application problem selection means, an explanation generation means for generating an explanation, and output data. Display means for displaying, presenting the question stored in the unacquired question storage file to the learner, and obtaining the answer of the learner to the presented question from the answer input means. If the correctness of the learner's answer obtained from the answer input means is diagnosed by the answer diagnosis means, and the diagnosis result of the answer obtained from the answer diagnosis means is correct, the correct question is stored in the learned question storage file. Then, the diagnosis result of the answer is displayed to the learner by the display means, and if the diagnosis result of the answer is incorrect, the question is selected by the selecting means and stored in the learned question storage file. The similarity between the learned question and the selected question is calculated by the similarity calculating means, and the problem to be applied to the generation of the explanation of the solution is selected by the applied problem selecting means based on the value of the similarity obtained by the similarity calculating means. Stored in the applied question storage file, and a description of the solution method using the applied problem stored in the applied question storage file is generated by the explanation generation means, and a diagnosis result or solution of the problem or answer is generated. An educational apparatus comprising means for displaying a method explanation to a learner from the display means.
JP22790594A 1994-09-22 1994-09-22 Educational equipment Expired - Fee Related JP3331769B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP22790594A JP3331769B2 (en) 1994-09-22 1994-09-22 Educational equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP22790594A JP3331769B2 (en) 1994-09-22 1994-09-22 Educational equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0895484A true JPH0895484A (en) 1996-04-12
JP3331769B2 JP3331769B2 (en) 2002-10-07

Family

ID=16868145

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP22790594A Expired - Fee Related JP3331769B2 (en) 1994-09-22 1994-09-22 Educational equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3331769B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20020005819A (en) * 2000-07-10 2002-01-18 김재관 Method for Providing Interactive Tutoring and Learning Services Using Internet
US7543091B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2009-06-02 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Self-organized parallel processing system
JP7336169B1 (en) * 2022-11-07 2023-08-31 株式会社翰林 Information processing device and information processing method

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20020005819A (en) * 2000-07-10 2002-01-18 김재관 Method for Providing Interactive Tutoring and Learning Services Using Internet
US7543091B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2009-06-02 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Self-organized parallel processing system
US7913006B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2011-03-22 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Self-organized parallel processing system
JP7336169B1 (en) * 2022-11-07 2023-08-31 株式会社翰林 Information processing device and information processing method
WO2024100715A1 (en) * 2022-11-07 2024-05-16 株式会社翰林 Information processing device and information processing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3331769B2 (en) 2002-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Anderson et al. The LISP tutor
Merrill et al. Instructional transaction theory: Instructional design based on knowledge objects
Shute et al. Principles for evaluating intelligent tutoring systems
US20040126748A1 (en) Computer-aided learning system and method
Wilcocks et al. Animating recursion as an aid to instruction
Wang et al. Step tutor: Supporting students through step-by-step example-based feedback
Whyte et al. Cognitive styles and feedback in computer-assisted instruction
Melo et al. Learning electrical circuits: The effects of the 4C-ID instructional approach in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge.
Beeson Logic and computation in MATHPERT: An expert system for learning mathematics
Stern et al. Adaptation of problem presentation and feedback in an intelligent mathematics tutor
Esteves et al. OOP-Anim, a system to support learning of basic object oriented programming concepts.
JPH0895484A (en) Education apparatus
Gregg Methods and models for task analysis in instructional design
Moussalle et al. Intelligent Tutoring Systems modelled through the mental states
Broda et al. Pandora: A reasoning toolbox using natural deduction style
Cline et al. Automated instructional design via instructional transactions
Alse et al. GATutor: A guided discovery based tutor for designing greedy algorithm
Wodtke SCRAMBLED VERSUS ORDERED SEQUENCING IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION.
Ahmad et al. Programming Teaching and Learning: Issues and Challenges
Redmond Educational implications of celia: Learning by observing and explaining
Scandura A plan for the development of a conceptually-based mathematics curriculum for disadvantaged children I: Theoretical foundations
Mincy et al. Visualizing Algorithms and Processes with the Aid of a Computer
JPH05210346A (en) Method for evaluating understanding state of learner
Bumgarner EFFECTS OF INFORMATIONAL FEEDBACK AND SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT ON ELEMENTARY STUDENTS'ACHIEVEMENT DURING CAI DRILL AND PRACTICE ON MULTIPLICATION FACTS (LEARNING THEORY)
Winkler et al. A New Approach Teaching Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20070726

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080726

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090726

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090726

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100726

Year of fee payment: 8

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees