JPH0826906A - Low environmentally noxious agricultural chemical preparation - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: To avoid a problem of spraying powder to a user and aim at the safety in environmental respects by blending a specific agrochemical component with a plasticizer such as a rosin and a derivative thereof, approved for the safe use in foods, a cosmetic material, etc., and a surfactant, and adding water for formulating. CONSTITUTION: This environmentally hazardous aqueous emulsion agrochemical preparation, is obtained by adding (D) water to (A) at least one kind of agrochemical material having <=100 deg.C melting point (45-675 g/l), (B) a plasticizer selected from a rosin or water insoluble rosin derivatives (5-525 g/l) and (C) at least one kind of surfactants (40-200 g/l) to make 1 l (provided to make >=200 g/l). As the agrochemical material, especially alachlor, endosulfan, bromoxynil, ioxynil, prochloraz, imazalyl, etc., are preferable. As the rosin derivative, a methyl ester of the rosin, a triethylene glycol ester of the rosin, etc., are especially preferable. As the surfactant, an ethoxylated castor oil, etc., are especially preferable. The above preparation has advantages such as a flame retarding property, a low toxicity to a skin, and in addition, a less irritation to the skin.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a specific type of pesticide (insecticide) formulation (hereinafter referred to as EW formulation) which is an emulsion in water. The invention is particularly concerned with EW pesticide formulations containing certain types of plasticizers such as rosins and rosin derivatives, their manufacture and their application to pesticides having low or medium melting points.

[0002]

Solid-like pesticides having low or medium melting points are generally marketed as emulsifiable concentrates. However, such formulations require significant amounts of organic solvents and other ingredients, causing toxicity and environmental hazard problems. The US Environmental Protection Agency has recently begun investigating ingredients other than active ingredients in pesticide formulations. In Europe, the ECC Parliament is at the stage of advanced legislation for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).
It requires eco-labeling for formulations containing. In fact, Canada and Germany already have systems for labeling environmental hazards.

Rosin and its derivatives have long been known and have been approved for safe use in a wide variety of products, including food and cosmetics. The use in agriculture is also known as follows.

British Patent No. 1,044,663 describes the use of rosin or its derivatives in organophosphorus pesticide compositions, but the compositions require the use of organic solvents.

Although British Patent No. 1,382,894 describes the use of rosin or its derivatives in carbamic acid ester compositions, the compositions also require the use of organic solvents. British Patent No. 1,051,360 (Chemical Abstracts, 66: 54
559V) and Soviet Union Patent No. 733,596 (Chemical Abstracts, 93: 12
The same applies to the composition described in 7147d).

For example, British Patent No. 1,398,227;
U.S. Patent No. 4,211,566; and Soviet Union Patent No. 1,187,773 (Chemical Abs).
tracts, 104 : 10445a), rosin or its derivatives are reported to be tackifiers in agrochemical formulations. Furthermore, rosin or its derivatives have been reported in powdered pesticide formulations, and examples thereof include JP-A-51-19132 (Chemical Abs).
tracts, 84 : 175194c); JP-A-63-
250, 308 (Chemical Abstract)
ts, 111 : 92336a); and Chinese Patent Publication No. 1,031,467 (Chemical Abstra).
cts, 113 : 19497r).

Chemical Abstracts,
86 : 156376p, a rosin derivative is reported to improve the microbial resistance of the polymer.

European Patent Nos. 432,061 and 43
No. 2,062 recently disclosed aqueous emulsions of various pesticides. However, while the composition does not require the use of rosin, undesired organic solvents still need to be used.

US Pat. No. 2,291,205 discloses the formulation of a liquid pesticide (pine oil) which uses a metal salt of rosin for the liquid active ingredient rather than a solid. What is effective as a liquid pesticide is not always effective as a solid pesticide in the EW formulation.

US Pat. No. 2,490,925 describes formulations in which a rosin or rosin derivative is the active pesticide. In the present invention, rosin is used as a plasticizer. Therefore, US Pat. No. 2,490,925 is not relevant to the present invention.

US Pat. No. 4,957,533 describes the use of rosin derivatives as a solvent for the formulation of certain types of compounds, among a number of compounds. However, this patent does not show any example where rosin derivatives are used.

[0012]

According to the present invention, (a) at least one pesticide having a melting point of 100 ° C. or lower 45 g / l to 675 g / l; (b) rosin or a water-insoluble rosin derivative 5 g / l to 5 of at least one plasticizer selected from the group consisting of
25 g / l; (c) 40 g / l to 200 of at least one surfactant
g / l; and (d) EW pesticide formulations comprising up to 1 liter, but not less than 200 g / l of water are provided.

The formulation of the present invention optionally comprises 200 g of at least one polar solvent which is wholly or partially water soluble.
Included at concentrations up to / l.

Suitable pesticides useful in the present invention may be selected, for example, from the following classes of pesticide active substances: acetanilide, benzoates, benzofurans, chlorinated hydrocarbons, hydroxybenzonitriles, imidazoles, nitroanilines, nitroxylenes, organics. Phosphorus compounds, oxydiazoles, phenoxy-phenoxy-alkane-carboxylic acid derivatives, pyrethroids, and triazoles.

Suitable acetanilides are especially compounds of the type described in US Pat. Nos. 3,442,945 and 3,547,620, especially 2-chloro-2 ', 6'.
-Diethyl-N- (methoxymethyl) -acetanilide (alachlor). Suitable benzoates are especially compounds of the type described in GB 1,247,817,
It is especially 3-chloro-ethoxyimino-2,6-dimethyloxybenzyl benzoate (benzooxymate). Suitable benzofurans are especially British Patent No. 1,
No. 271,659, compounds of the type
2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate (etofumesate). Suitable chlorinated hydrocarbons are especially compounds of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,799,685, especially 6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,
5,5a, 6,9,9a-Hexahydro-6,9-methano-2,4,3-benzo-diolatiepine-3-oxide (endosulfan). Suitable hydroxybenzonitriles are especially compounds of the type described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,397,054 and 4,332,613, especially the ester of 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenylcyanide (bromoxynil) and It is an ester (ioxynyl) of 3,5-diiodo-4-hydroxyphenyl cyanide. Suitable imidazoles are especially compounds of the type described in British Patent 1,469,772, especially N-propyl-N- [2- (2,4,6-trichlorophenoxy) -ethyl] -1H-imidazole-1. -Carboxamide; further compounds described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,658,813, especially 1- [2- (2,4-dichlorophenyl) -2- (2-prophenyloxy) -ethyl] -1H-imidazole ( Imazalil). Suitable nitroanilines are especially US Pat. No. 3,257,190.
Compounds of the type described in U.S. Pat.
It is ethyl-2,6-dinitro-4-trifluoro-methyl-aniline (benfluralin) or 2,6-dinitro-N, N-dipropyl-4-trifluoro-methylaniline (trifluralin). Suitable nitroxylenes are especially compounds of the type described in US Pat. No. 3,385,862, especially N- (1-ethylpropyl) -2,
6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine (pendimethalin)
Is. Suitable organophosphorus compounds are in particular US Pat.
44,586 of the type described above, especially O,
O-diethyl-O- (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl) -phosphorothioate (chloropyrifosethyl) and O, O-dimethyl-O- (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl)- Phosphorothioate (chloropyrifosmethyl); further compounds described in British Patent 974,138, especially 1,3-dithiolane-2-ylidene-phosphorimidate (phosphorane); further US Pat. 230 and 3,240,668
, Especially S-[{5-methoxy-2
-Oxo-1,3,4-thiadiazole-3- (2H)
-Yl} -methyl] -O, O-dimethyl-phosphoro-dithioate (methidathione); further US Pat.
No. 05,253, especially O, O-diiso-propyl-S-2-phenyl-sulfonyl-aminoethyl-phosphoro-dithioate (benzlide); further described in US Pat. No. 2,978,479. Compound,
Especially ethyl-3-methyl-4- (methylthio) -phenyl-isopropyl-phosphoramodiate (phenamiphos). Suitable oxydiazoles are especially compounds of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,385,862, especially 3- [2,4-dichloro-5- (1-methyl-ethoxy) -phenyl] -5- (1. , 1-Dimethyl-ethyl) -1,3,4-oxadiazole-2- (3H)-
It is on (oxadiazon). Suitable phenoxy-phenoxy-alkane-carboxylic acid derivatives are especially compounds of the type described in West German Patents 2,136,828 and 2,223,804, especially methyl-2- [4-
It is (2,4-dichloro-phenoxy) -phenoxy] -propanoate (diclophopmethyl). Suitable pyrethroids are especially compounds of the type described in GB 1,413,491, especially (3-phenoxy-phenyl) -methyl-3- (2,2-dichloro-ethenyl)-.
2,2-Dimethyl-cyclopropane-carboxylate (permethrin) and cyano- (3-phenoxy-phenyl) -methyl-3- (2,2-dichloroethenyl)-
2,2-dimethyl-cyclopropane-carboxylate (cypermethrin); additionally 2-methyl-biphenyl-
3-yl-methyl- (Z)-(IRS) -cis-3-
(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-prop-1
-Enyl) -2,2-dimethyl-cyclopropane-carboxylate (bifenthrin); further compounds described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,062,698, especially cyano- (3-phenoxy-phenyl) -methyl- (RS ) −
It is 2- (4-chloro-phenyl) -3-methylbutyrate (fenvalerate). Suitable triazoles are especially compounds of the type described in Israel Patent No. 73,450, especially 2- (4-chlorophenyl) -2- (1
H)-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl-methyl) hexanitrile (microbutanyl); further compounds described in GB 1,522,657, especially 1
-[2- (2,4-Dichlorophenyl) -4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl-]-methyl-1H
It is -1,2,4-triazole (propiconazole).

The plasticizers useful in the present invention are rosin and water-insoluble rosin derivatives. Water-insoluble rosin derivatives include hydrogenated rosins, polymerized rosins, methyl esters of rosins or hydrogenated rosins, glycerol esters of rosins or hydrogenated rosins, triethylene glycol esters of rosins or hydrogenated rosins, and rosins or hydrogenated rosins. Includes the pentaerythritol ester of rosin.
Most preferred are rosin, methyl ester of rosin and triethylene glycol ester of rosin.

In order for the formulation of the present invention to maintain environmental acceptability, it is preferable to use a surfactant whose lipophilic portion is a safe natural product. Such surfactants are commonly used in the food and cosmetic industry.

The nonionic surfactant of the present invention is 7-1.
7, preferably in the range of 10-15. L. B. Is to have. Examples of such surfactants include alkoxylated triglycerides, alkoxylated di- or tristyryl-phenols, alkoxylated alkylphenols, alkoxylated alcohols, alkoxylated fatty alcohols, and alkoxylated sorbitol fatty esters. Preferred surfactants are alkoxylated triglycerides such as ethoxylated castor oil,
Ethoxylated propoxylated castor oil and alkoxylated sorbitan fatty esters are preferred, but most preferred are ethoxylated castor oil and ethoxylated propoxylated castor oil.

The anionic surfactant of the present invention includes:
Phosphoric acid esters of alkoxylated di- or tristyrylphenols, sulfuric acid, sulfonic acids or phosphoric acid esters of alkoxylated alkylphenols, sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid esters of alkoxylated fatty alcohols, or metal of alkylbenzene sulfonic acids in acid or neutralized form Examples include salt.

The polar solvent optionally included in the formulation of the present invention should have a flash point of 23 ° C. or higher and a water solubility of 5% or higher. Examples of polar solvents optionally included in the formulations of the present invention include alcohols, glycols, polyglycols, glycol ethers, ketones, and high solvent polar solvents such as γ-butyrolactone, N-methylpyrrolidone. The concentration of such solvent in the formulations of the invention should not be higher than the concentration of water.

The novel formulations of the present invention may further comprise: an antifreeze agent; an antifoaming agent (eg polysiloxane); an emulsion stabilizer; an auxiliary additive.

Conventional antifreeze agents include substances such as propylene glycol, glycerol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, urea, or ethylene glycol.

Examples of emulsion stabilizers include fumed precipitated silica and aluminosilicates, bentonite and other swellable clays.

Other compounds such as xanthan gum-based, alginate, polysaccharides of carboxylated or hydroxylated methyl cellulose, polyvinyl-pyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol-based synthetic polymers can also be used as emulsion stabilizers.

As auxiliary additives that can be used, antioxidants and UV protectants, pH buffers, bactericides and A.I. I. Stabilizers may be mentioned.

The concentrated EW formulations of the present invention may be prepared as follows: one or more molten agrochemical active ingredients are mixed with one or more plasticizers, and one or more surfactants are added to the mixture, The emulsion is prepared according to any of the standard manufacturing methods. For this, high shear mixers, high pressure pumps,
A shaker, an orifice homogenizer, etc. may be used.

The concentrated water-in-water emulsion of the present invention is -14
It is physically and chemically stable in the temperature range of ° C to 54 ° C, and no crystallization phenomenon is observed during storage. The emulsion is also stable when diluted with water. Such emulsions may be used neat as uv formulations or at low dilution (LV formulations).

The formulations of the present invention are commercially available from E. C. It is also noted that the herbicidal activity is low compared to the equivalent. The formulations according to the invention can partly replace the powder formulations and avoid all dusting problems for the user.

The EW formulations of the present invention have the additional advantages of being flame retardant, of low toxicity to the skin, and of being less irritating to the skin.

Finally, the EW formulations of the invention can be considered safe in terms of environmental hazards because they are manufactured with safe inactive ingredients. As a result, it is not only an effective formulation but also a formulation that can meet the strict requirements of the US Environmental Protection Agency and the strong regulation of volatile organic compounds in Europe.

The invention will now be described with reference to certain preferred embodiments in the examples, it being understood that the invention is not limited to these particular embodiments. On the contrary, all changes, modifications and equivalents are intended to be included within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims. The following examples, including preferred embodiments, are illustrative of the practice of the invention, the specific embodiments shown are examples, for purposes of illustrating and discussing the preferred embodiments of the invention, and of the method of the invention. And to provide what is believed to explain the principles and concepts in the most effective and easy-to-understand manner.

[0032]

Example 1 210 g of molten endosulfan and 190 g of Aba
lyn E (methyl ester of rosin from Hercules), 100 g of Soprophor 14-R
(Epoxylated castor oil 60EO from RP) and 10 g of Epoxol 7-4 (epoxidized soybean oil-Swift) were added. The mixture was mixed until uniform. 5g Aeroloril in 475g deionized water
COK 84 (fumed silicon from Degussa) was added. Homogenizer Ultron Turo
A suspension was prepared at x 45 T. Then Ae
An emulsion was prepared by slowly adding an aqueous suspension of rosil COK 84 to the organic mixture. During this operation, 1 g of antifoam agent Silicon AF120 (AID
CH1M) was added. Stirring speed up to 10,000r
This work was performed in about 15 minutes, gradually increasing to pm. This emulsion had the following properties: -Stable at temperature -14 ° C to 54 ° C-No crystallization over time-Diluted with CIPAC standard water D to a ratio of 5/100 (v / v). However, stability is maintained (no substance separation or cream subsidence is observed).

Example 2 The method of Example 1 was repeated as follows, using ethylchloropyrifos as the active ingredient. 255 g of molten chloropyrifosethyl, 255 g of Hydrogal M
(Ethyl ester of hydrogenated rosin manufactured by DRT),
100 g Soprophor 14-R, 1.2 g Epoxol 7-4, 1 g Silicaid AF
100 and 5 g of Aerosil COK 84 were suspended in 1 liter of deionized water. This emulsion had the following properties: -stable at temperatures from -14 ° C to + 54 ° C; -does not crystallize over time; -stable when diluted to 5% v / v with CIPAC standard water D. is there.

Example 3 To 110 g of molten cypermethrin, 160 g of Abal was added.
yn E (methyl ester of rosin from Hercules), 50 g Berol 917 (20 EO ethoxylated castor oil from Berol) and 50 g Bero.
199 (ethoxylated castor oil 32 from Berol
EO) was added. This was mixed until a homogeneous liquid was obtained.

A 2% aqueous suspension of Aerosil COK 84 was prepared. About 131.5 g of the aqueous suspension was placed in a planetary mixer. An organic concentrate (AI + plasticizer + emulsifier) was gradually added to this aqueous suspension while mixing.

The above work required about 20 minutes. To this mixture was added 96 g deionized water and mixing was continued for 10 minutes. The prepared solution was stirred at a maximum stirring speed of 10,000 rpm in an Ultra Turax 45T homogenizer.
And stirred for about 1 minute. About 1g of Silicaid AF
100 was added with stirring. Finally, 422.5g
Of water was added to the emulsion with gentle mixing. The concentration of cypermethrin in this emulsion is 100 g / l
Met. This emulsion had the following properties: -stable at temperatures from -14 ° C to + 54 ° C; -does not crystallize over time; -stable when diluted to 5% v / v with CIPAC standard water D. is there.

Example 4 280 g molten propiconazole, 30 g Grano
lite M (methyl ester of rosin produced by DRT),
150g Servirox OEG68.5 (SER
VO), 1 g of Silicaid AF 100 antifoam, and 1 liter of an emulsion-making amount of deionized water were used and the method described in Example 1 was repeated. This emulsion had the following properties: -stable at temperatures from -14 ° C to + 54 ° C; -no crystallization over time; -diluted with CIPAC standard water D to a ratio of 5% v / v. It is stable.

Example 5 215 g molten alachlor, 150 g Emulsan
EL (Ethoxylated castor oil 36E manufactured by BASF
O), 200 g of Abalyn E, and 1 liter of emulsion-making deionized water, Example 1
Was repeated. This emulsion had the following properties: -stable at temperatures from -14 ° C to + 54 ° C; -does not crystallize over time; -stable when diluted to 5% v / v with CIPAC standard water D. is there.

Example 6 205 g molten imazalil, 180 g Granoli
te M, 100 g of Servirox OEG68.
The method described in Example 1 was repeated using 5, 1 g of antifoam Silicaid AF 100, and 1 liter of deionized water to make an emulsion. This emulsion had the following properties: -stable at temperatures from -14 ° C to + 54 ° C; -no crystallization over time; -diluted with CIPAC standard water D to a ratio of 5% v / v. It is stable.

Example 7 200 g of Gum Resin Pale 2A-WW
(Made by SOCER) 150g Agsol Ex 1
(Made by ISP) and melted at about 100 ° C. To this mixture, 410 g of Prochloraz tech,
And 65g WITCONOL NS 500 LQ
(Manufactured by WITCO) was added. The preparation was mixed until uniform. An emulsion was prepared in a planetary mixer by gradually adding 355 g of deionized water to this organic mixture. Add this emulsion to Ultra Turax
Homogenized with 45T. 1 during this work
g of antifoam agent Silicone AF 100 was added.
This emulsion had the following properties: -stable in the temperature range -14 ° C to + 54 ° C; -does not crystallize over time; -dilute with CIPAC standard water D to a ratio of 5% v / v. Is also stable.

Example 8 215 g of molten bromoxynitol octanoate, 15
0 g Soprophor 14-R, 185 g Gr
The method of Example 1 was repeated using anolite M and 1 liter of an emulsion-making amount of deionized water. The properties of this emulsion were similar to those described above.

Example 9 Using 20 EW of endosulfan (Example 1) and 35 EC of commercially available endosulfan, an experiment for investigating relative herbicidal properties was conducted.

The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse using cucumber. 0.1% A. I. , And was observed 6 days later. The results are as follows.

[0044] Both formulations had some herbicidal properties but the E.
Formulation W was less herbicidal than commercial EC.

Example 10 Using the formulation of Example 2, 100 liters / 1000 m
^An oil-in-water emulsion was formed by mixing an appropriate amount of the formulation with water to apply chloropyrifos 50 g / 1000 m ² at a spray rate of ² . The results are obtained from commercial chloropyrifos 48E. C. It compared with the result of (aromatic solvent). These emulsions of vineyards po ly chrosi
Scattered on s bottom . The number of contaminated berries in 20 bunches was counted. The results are shown in the table below.
The average number of infected sites and the number of infected berries per bun are shown.

[0046]

[Table 1]

Example 11 Pseudococ of grapes was prepared according to the method of Example 10.
cus s. p. A similar experiment was performed for the. The results are as follows.

[0048]

[Table 2]

Example 12 The insecticidal activity of chlorpyrifos preparations was tested at the Institute of Biology at the German cockroach Blattella germanica (D) bred in a laboratory of the Ministry of Health in Jerusalem.
ictyopera: Blattellidae).

The Pirinex formulations tested are the following: Conventional hygiene formulation 480 g / l a. i. EC; 2. Chlorpyrifos 250 g / l a. i. EW; 3. Untreated.

Method : 0.5% of formulation to be tested a. i. The ceramic tile was immersed in the solution. After the water and solvent had evaporated from the surface, the two tiles were placed on top of each other with a cardboard in between and placed in a plastic test box. The test box is 16 x 33 x 38.5 cm and has 4 vents,
It had one sleeve for introducing food and water and was covered with a glass plate. Each exposure experiment lasted 48 hours and was repeated 4 times on 25 to 50 cockroaches. This method avoided forced contact between the cockroaches and the formulation coated tile.

The results showing the activity of the different formulations are given in the table below.

[0053]

[Table 3]

─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (51) Int.Cl. ⁶ Identification code Office reference number FI technical display location A01N 37/26 37/34 106 9155-4H 43/24 43/50 C 43/653 P 47/38 B 53/08 57/16 102 B

Claims (31)

[Claims] 1. (a) 45 g / l to 675 g / l of at least one pesticide having a melting point of 100 ° C. or lower; (b) 5 g / plasticizer selected from the group consisting of rosin or a water-insoluble rosin derivative. 1 to 525 g / l; (c) at least one surfactant 40 g / l to 200
g / l; and (d) Aqueous emulsion pesticide formulation consisting of water up to 1 liter, but 200 g / l or more. 2. The pesticide is selected from the group consisting of acetanilide, benzoate, chlorinated hydrocarbons, hydroxybenzonitrile, imidazole, nitroaniline, nitroxylene, organic phosphorus derivatives, phenoxy-phenoxy-alkanecarboxylic acids, pyrethroids, and triazoles. The formulation of claim 1, which is selected. 3. The pesticide is acetanilide, chlorinated hydrocarbon, hydroxy-benzonitrile, imidazole,
The formulation according to claim 1 or 2, which is selected from the group consisting of organic phosphorus derivatives, pyrethroids, and triazoles. 4. The preparation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is alachlor. 5. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is endosulfan. 6. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is selected from the group consisting of bromoxynil and ioxynil. 7. The pesticide is prochloraz, according to claim 1.
The formulation according to any one of 1 to 3. 8. The formulation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is imazalil. 9. The preparation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is chloropyrifos. 10. The preparation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is cypermethrin. 11. The preparation according to claim 1, wherein the pesticide is propiconazole. 12. The rosin derivative according to claim 1, wherein the rosin derivative is selected from the group consisting of rosin esters such as methyl ester of rosin, glycerol ester of rosin, triethylene glycol ester of rosin and hydrogenated ester of rosin. The formulation according to one paragraph. 13. The preparation according to claim 12, wherein the rosin derivative is a methyl ester of rosin or a triethylene glycol ester of rosin. 14. The surfactant is an alkoxylated triglyceride, an alkoxylated di- or tristyryl-phenol, an alkoxylated alkylphenol, an alkoxylated fatty amine, an alkoxylated fatty alcohol, an alkoxylated sorbitol fatty ester, and
Selected from the group consisting of phosphoric acid esters of alkoxylated di- or tristyrylphenols, sulfuric acid, sulfonic acids or phosphoric acid esters of alkoxylated alkylphenols, or sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid esters of alkoxylated fatty alcohols in acid or neutralized form. The formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein 15. The formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the surfactant is selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated castor oil and alkoxylated butyl alcohol. 16. The formulation according to any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the surfactant is ethoxylated castor oil or ethoxylated propoxylated castor oil. 17. An aliphatic hydrocarbon, alcohol,
A polar solvent selected from the group consisting of glycols, polyglycols, glycol ethers, ketones, and high-solvent polar solvents such as γ-butyrolactone and N-methylpyrrolidone, and mixtures thereof.
The formulation according to any one of 6 above. 18. The formulation of claim 17, wherein the polar solvent is selected from the group consisting of n-methylpyrrolidone and γ-butyrolactone. 19. (a) 45 g / l to 675 g / l of at least one pesticide having a melting point of 100 ° C. or lower; (b) rosin, methyl ester of rosin, glycol ester of rosin, triethylene glycol ester of rosin, And 5 g / l to 525 g / l of a plasticizer selected from the group consisting of hydrogenated esters of rosin; (c) 40 g of at least one surfactant selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated castor oil and alkoxylated butyl alcohol esters. / L to 200 g / l; and (d) up to 1 liter, but an emulsion pesticide formulation in water consisting of 200 g / l or more of water. 20. The pesticide is acetanilide, benzoate, chlorinated hydrocarbon, hydroxybenzonitrile,
20. The formulation of claim 19, selected from the group consisting of imidazole, nitroaniline, nitroxylene, organophosphorus derivatives, phenoxy-phenoxy-alkanecarboxylic acids, pyrethroids, and triazoles. 21. The pesticide is acetanilide, chlorinated hydrocarbon, hydroxybenzonitrile, imidazole,
The formulation according to claim 19 or 20, which is selected from the group consisting of organophosphorus derivatives, pyrethroids, and triazoles. 22. The pesticide is alachlor.
The formulation according to any one of 9 to 21. 23. The formulation according to any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the pesticide is endosulfan. 24. The pesticide of claim 19 selected from the group consisting of bromoxynil and ioxynil.
The formulation according to any one of 1. 25. The preparation according to any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the pesticide is prochloraz. 26. The pesticide is imazalil.
The formulation according to any one of 9 to 21. 27. The formulation according to any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the pesticide is chloropyrifos. 28. The formulation according to any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the pesticide is cypermethrin. 29. The formulation according to any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the pesticide is propiconazole. 30. The formulation of any one of claims 17-29, wherein the rosin derivative is selected from the group consisting of rosin methyl ester and rosin triethylene glycol ester. 31. The formulation according to any one of claims 17 to 29, wherein the surfactant is an alkoxylated butyl alcohol.