JPH08235500A - Collision prevention support device - Google Patents

Collision prevention support device

Info

Publication number
JPH08235500A
JPH08235500A JP7034951A JP3495195A JPH08235500A JP H08235500 A JPH08235500 A JP H08235500A JP 7034951 A JP7034951 A JP 7034951A JP 3495195 A JP3495195 A JP 3495195A JP H08235500 A JPH08235500 A JP H08235500A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
target
alarm
collision
dangerous state
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP7034951A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Kazuo Okamoto
和男 岡本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Oki Electric Industry Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Oki Electric Industry Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oki Electric Industry Co Ltd filed Critical Oki Electric Industry Co Ltd
Priority to JP7034951A priority Critical patent/JPH08235500A/en
Publication of JPH08235500A publication Critical patent/JPH08235500A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prevent a target from colliding by recognizing a dangerous state correctly by passing alarm judgement by using an alarm judging value in which the size of the target with possibility of collision is added as a variable. CONSTITUTION: An alarm judging condition judging means 1 sets the alarm judging value of the dangerous state by adding the size of the target with possibility of collision as the variable. A target tracing means 2 traces the target by calculating the future predictive position of each target inputted sequentially from a fixed station radar 20 sequentially, and an alarm discrimination arithmetic means 3 calculates the future predictive position of the target being traced by the target tracing means 2, it arrival time and a future dangerous state between the targets based on them, and when such alarm discrimination that such calculated dangerous state goes to a value less than the alarm judging value of the dangerous state set by the alarm judging condition judging means 1 is passed, a collision alarm signal relating to a discriminated target is outputted. An alarm display processing means 4 displays the collision alarm signal relating to the discriminated target on an external display 40.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、陸上の固定局レーダに
よる船舶の衝突予防支援装置に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a collision prevention support device for a ship using a land-based fixed station radar.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来この種の装置は、「衝突予防装置に
関する調査研究報告書」(昭和57年3月、財団法人日
本船舶用品検定協会発行)に記載の自動レーダプロッテ
ィング援助装置(ARPA)に関する基準に適合する船
舶に搭載される衝突予防装置が主製品になっていた。こ
の船舶搭載用の衝突予防装置は、この装置を搭載してい
る船舶が、他船との衝突を防止するため、次に説明する
警報動作を行うものであった。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, this type of device is an automatic radar plotting assistance device (ARPA) described in "Research Report on Collision Prevention Device" (March 1982, issued by Japan Ship Supplies Certification Association). The main product was a collision prevention device that is installed on ships that comply with the standards for This collision prevention device for mounting on a ship carries out an alarm operation described below in order to prevent a ship equipped with this device from colliding with another ship.

【0003】即ち上記ARPAに関する基準の項目3.
4動作警報の3.4.1〜3.4.3に、(1)近接物
標警報、(2)TCPA(最接近距離到達時間)に対す
る警報及びCPA(最接近距離)に対する警報に関する
試験方法が規定されており、これを要約すると下記の通
りである。まず自船と最低2つの他船物標との間で、衝
突のおそれがある危険状態になったとき、警報が正しく
発生されるか否かの試験として、(1)あらかじめ自船
から10海里と2.5海里の距離にガードリングを設定
しておき、このガードリングに他船が到達したとき、こ
の到達時刻から1分以内に可視可聴の警報を自動的に発
生するかの試験と、(2)自船に搭載したARPAのC
PAを1海里、TCPAを15分にそれぞれ設定してお
き、捕捉追尾中の他船物標による実際のTCPAの警報
及びCPAの警報を発生したときのTCPAの値及びC
PAの値を記録し、この記録した値が前記設定値の±1
0%の範囲内であるかの試験を行うものであった。
That is, item 3 of the standard relating to the ARPA.
4 Operation alarms 3.4.1 to 3.4.3, (1) Proximity target alarm, (2) TCPA (closest approach distance arrival time) alarm and CPA (closest approach distance) alarm test method Has been stipulated and is summarized below. First, as a test of whether or not an alarm is properly generated when there is a danger of collision between your ship and at least two other ship targets, (1) 10 nautical miles from your ship in advance. And a test to set a guard ring at a distance of 2.5 nautical miles, and when another ship arrives at this guard ring, whether a visual and audible alarm is automatically generated within 1 minute from this arrival time, (2) ARPA C installed on the ship
The PA is set to 1 nautical mile and the TCPA is set to 15 minutes, and the TCPA value and C when the actual TCPA alarm and CPA alarm are generated by another ship target during tracking and tracking.
The value of PA is recorded, and this recorded value is ± 1 of the set value.
The test was to see if it was within the range of 0%.

【0004】次に従来のCPA及びTCPAの算出方法
とその警報動作について説明する。図3は従来のCPA
及びTCPAの算出方法の説明図である。図3におい
て、自船の位置をA地点、他船の位置をB地点、この2
船が最も接近したときの自船の位置をC地点とすると、
CPA(最接近距離)は、B地点からC地点までの距離
BCが最小となる時刻における距離となる。そしてTC
PA(最接近距離到達時間)は、CPAに至るまでの時
間であるから、図3においては、自船がA地点からC地
点に到達する(A地点がC地点となる)までの時間とな
る。図3の(a)においては、A地点及びB地点におけ
る物標の大きさを全く考慮せず、単に2つの点であると
考えて、CPAはこの2つの点の間の最接近距離、TC
PAはCPAに至るまでの時間、即ちA地点とC地点の
間の距離をRとして、自船と他船間の相対速力をVとす
ると、TCPA=R/Vとして求めている。このように
物標を大きさのない点とみなして、この2点間のCPA
及びTCPAを算出するのが、従来の計算方法であっ
た。
Next, a conventional method of calculating CPA and TCPA and its alarm operation will be described. Figure 3 shows the conventional CPA
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of a calculation method of TCPA and TCPA. In Fig. 3, the position of the own ship is point A, the position of the other ship is point B, and
If the position of the ship when the ship comes closest to it is point C,
CPA (closest approach distance) is the distance at the time when the distance BC from point B to point C is the minimum. And TC
Since PA (closest approach time) is the time to reach CPA, in FIG. 3, it is the time from the point A to point C (point A becomes point C). . In (a) of FIG. 3, the size of the target at the points A and B is not considered at all, and the points are simply two points, and CPA is the closest distance between these two points, TC
PA is TCPA = R / V, where R is the time to reach CPA, that is, the distance between points A and C, and V is the relative speed between the ship and the other ship. In this way, the target is regarded as a point without size, and the CPA between these two points is
The conventional calculation method was to calculate TCPA and TCPA.

【0005】次にCPA及びTCPAの警報動作につい
て説明する。衝突のおそれのある物標の危険状態を示す
数値として、前記CPA及びTCPAの基準値をあらか
じめ設定しておく(例えば前記ARPAの試験条件と同
一にCPAを1海里、TCPAを15分と設定してお
く)。そして衝突予防装置は、現在追尾中の他船と自船
が、今後も現在の針路と速度をそのまま維持するものと
して、将来の両船の予測位置とその船間距離を逐次算出
する。即ち現在から1分後、2分後、3分後…の両船の
予測位置とその船間距離を逐次計算してゆき、将来の両
船の船間距離が最小となる距離(CPA)と、このCP
Aに到達するまでの時間(TCPA、例えば現在から1
0分後)を計算する。次に衝突予防装置は、上記将来を
予測して算出したCPAとTCPAの算出値があらかじ
め設定された基準値以下になるか否かを判別し、以下に
なる場合には衝突の危険があるものとして警報を発生す
る。例えばCPAの設定値1海里に対して算出値が0.
75海里になったり、CPAの算出値は1海里である
が、TCPAの設定値15分に対して算出値が10分に
なったような場合に、直ちに警報動作を行うものであっ
た。
Next, the alarm operation of CPA and TCPA will be described. The reference values of the CPA and TCPA are set in advance as numerical values indicating the dangerous state of the target that may collide (for example, the CPA is set to 1 nautical mile and the TCPA is set to 15 minutes under the same ARPA test conditions). ). Then, the collision prevention device successively calculates the predicted positions of both ships in the future and their inter-vehicular distances, assuming that the other ship currently being tracked and the own ship will continue to maintain the current course and speed in the future. That is, one minute, two minutes, three minutes, and so on, the predicted positions of both ships and the distance between them will be calculated one by one, and the distance (CPA) that minimizes the distance between both ships in the future will be calculated. CP
Time to reach A (TCPA, eg 1 from now)
0 minutes later) is calculated. Next, the collision prevention device determines whether or not the calculated values of CPA and TCPA, which are calculated by predicting the future, are equal to or less than a preset reference value. As an alarm. For example, the calculated value is 0.
When the calculated value of CPA is 75 nautical miles or when the calculated value of CPA is 1 nautical mile but the calculated value becomes 10 minutes with respect to the set value of 15 minutes of TCPA, the alarm action is immediately performed.

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上記の
船舶搭載用の衝突予防装置では、CPA及びTCPAの
算出方法が、物標の大きさを考慮していないため、危険
状態を正しく把握して警報動作を行うことができないと
いう問題と、衝突予防の対象となる船舶の数が、衝突予
防装置の搭載されている船舶とこれに関係する他の2つ
の船舶に限定されるという問題があった。例えば、VL
CCやULCC等の大型タンカは、その船体長が200
〜300mもあり、これらの船舶を対象とする実際のC
PAの危険状態の判定には、船舶の船体長や、物標の大
きさの考慮が必要となる。図3の(b)においては、物
標の大きさによっては、図3の(a)で求めたCPAに
達する前に衝突することがあることを模型的に示してい
る。このように従来のCPA及びTCPAに基づく警報
処理方式においては、双方の船舶の大きさやその接近状
態(交差、反航、同航等)によって警報判定値等の警報
処理条件を適時変化させることができないという問題点
があった。
However, in the above-described collision preventing device for mounting on a ship, the calculation method of CPA and TCPA does not consider the size of the target, so that the danger condition is correctly grasped and an alarm is issued. There is a problem that operation is not possible, and a problem that the number of ships subject to collision prevention is limited to the ship equipped with the collision prevention device and two other ships related thereto. For example, VL
Large tankers such as CC and ULCC have a hull length of 200
~ 300m, the actual C for these vessels
In order to determine the dangerous state of the PA, it is necessary to consider the length of the ship and the size of the target. FIG. 3B shows a model that a collision may occur before reaching the CPA obtained in FIG. 3A depending on the size of the target. As described above, in the conventional alarm processing method based on CPA and TCPA, it is possible to change the alarm processing conditions such as the alarm determination value in a timely manner depending on the size of both ships and their approaching states (crossing, reverse sailing, same sailing, etc.). There was a problem that it could not be done.

【0007】さらに陸上の固定局に設けられたレーダ
(例えば港湾監視レーダ)と結合される衝突予防支援装
置においては、その監視対象領域内に存在する多数の各
種船舶間における衝突を、前記船舶の大きさやその接近
状態等の特殊な状況を加味して予防支援することを目的
としており、従来の船舶搭載用衝突予防装置では、衝突
予防の対象となる船舶数が限定されているため、この陸
上固定局用の衝突予防支援装置としての目的を満足させ
ることができないという問題点があった。
Further, in a collision prevention support device coupled with a radar (for example, a port surveillance radar) provided in a land-based fixed station, a collision between a large number of various vessels existing in the area to be monitored is prevented from occurring in the vessel. The purpose is to provide preventive support by taking into consideration special circumstances such as size and approaching conditions.The number of ships subject to collision prevention is limited in the conventional ship-borne collision prevention device. There is a problem that the purpose as a collision prevention support device for a fixed station cannot be satisfied.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明に係る衝突予防支
援装置は、陸上の固定局レーダと結合され、前記レーダ
の監視対象領域内に存在する複数の物標間の衝突予防を
支援する装置であって、衝突のおそれのある物標の大き
さを変数Xとしたときの危険状態の警報判定値Yを、前
記Xに乗算する係数をA、常数をBとして、Y=A・X
+Bとして設定できる警報判定条件設定手段と、前記固
定局レーダから逐次入力する各物標の位置情報に基づき
各物標の将来の予測位置を逐次算出して物標追尾を行う
物標追尾手段と、前記物標追尾手段が追尾中の物標の将
来の予測位置とその到達時間及びこれらに基づく物標間
の今後の危険状態を算出し、この算出した危険状態が前
記警報判定条件設定手段に設定された危険状態の警報判
定値以下になるか否かの警報判別を行い、以下になると
警報判別した場合には、この判別物標に係る衝突警報信
号を出力する警報判別演算手段と、前記警報判別演算手
段が衝突警報信号を出力したときに、外部の表示器に前
記判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を表示させる警報表示処
理手段とを備えたものである。
A collision prevention support apparatus according to the present invention is an apparatus which is coupled with a land-based fixed station radar and supports collision prevention between a plurality of targets existing in a monitoring target area of the radar. In addition, Y = A · X, where A is a coefficient and B is a constant, and X is a warning determination value Y in a dangerous state when the size of a target that may cause a collision is a variable X.
An alarm determination condition setting means that can be set as + B, and a target tracking means that sequentially calculates a future predicted position of each target based on the position information of each target that is sequentially input from the fixed station radar, and target tracking means. , The target tracking means calculates a future predicted position of the target being tracked and its arrival time and a future dangerous state between the targets based on these, and the calculated dangerous state becomes the alarm determination condition setting means. An alarm determination is made as to whether or not the value is equal to or less than a set alarm determination value for a dangerous state. An alarm display processing means for displaying the collision warning signal relating to the discrimination target on an external display when the warning discrimination calculation means outputs the collision warning signal.

【0009】[0009]

【作用】本発明においては、陸上の固定局レーダと結合
され、前記レーダの監視対象領域内に存在する複数の物
標間の衝突予防を支援する装置において、警報判定条件
設定手段によって衝突のおそれのある物標の大きさを変
数Xとしたときの危険状態の警報判定値Yを、前記Xに
乗算する係数をA、常数をBとして、Y=A・X+Bと
して設定でき、物標追尾手段は前記固定局レーダから逐
次入力する各物標の位置情報に基づき各物標の将来の予
測位置を逐次算出して物標追尾を行い、警報判別演算手
段は前記物標追尾手段が追尾中の物標の将来の予測位置
とその到達時間及びこれらに基づく物標間の今後の危険
状態を算出し、この算出した危険状態が前記警報判定条
件設定手段に設定された危険状態の警報判定値以下にな
るか否かの警報判別を行い、以下になると警報判別した
場合には、この判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を出力し、
警報表示処理手段は前記警報判別演算手段が衝突警報信
号を出力したときに、外部の表示器に前記判別物標に係
る衝突警報信号を表示させるようにしたので、衝突のお
それのある物標の大きさを変数として警報判定値を自動
的に変化させて警報判別を行い、従来よりも危険状態を
正しく把握した判別情報により警報動作を行うことがで
きる。
According to the present invention, in a device which is coupled with a land-based fixed station radar and supports collision prevention between a plurality of targets existing in the area to be monitored by the radar, there is a risk of collision due to the alarm determination condition setting means. A target value tracking means can be set as Y = A · X + B, where A is a coefficient for multiplying X by an alarm determination value Y of a dangerous state when the size of a certain target is a variable X, and B is a constant. The target tracking is performed by sequentially calculating the future predicted position of each target based on the position information of each target sequentially input from the fixed station radar, and the alarm discrimination calculation means is performing tracking by the target tracking means. The future predicted position of the target and its arrival time and the future dangerous state between the targets based on these are calculated, and the calculated dangerous state is less than or equal to the warning judgment value of the dangerous state set in the warning judgment condition setting means. Warning judgment whether or not Was carried out, the case of the alarm determination becomes less, and outputs a collision warning signal according to the determination target object,
The alarm display processing means, when the warning discrimination calculation means outputs the collision warning signal, causes the external display to display the collision warning signal related to the discriminated target. The alarm determination value is automatically changed with the size as a variable to perform the alarm determination, and the alarm operation can be performed based on the determination information that correctly grasps the dangerous state as compared with the related art.

【0010】[0010]

【実施例】図1は本発明に係る衝突予防支援装置の構成
を示す図である。図1において、10は本発明に係る陸
上の固定局用の衝突予防支援装置であり、下記の1〜4
の機器を含んでいる。1は本発明に係る警報判定条件設
定手段であり、例えば外部のキーボード等の操作器30
と接続され、衝突のおそれのある物標の大きさを変数X
としたときの危険状態の警報判定値Yを、前記Xに乗算
する係数をA、常数をBとして、Y=A・X+Bとして
設定できるものである。2は物標追尾手段であり、陸上
の固定局レーダ20から逐次入力される各物標の位置情
報に基づき、前記各物標の将来の予測位置を逐次算出し
て物標追尾を行うものであり、従来の衝突予防装置に含
まれる周知の手段である。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the structure of a collision prevention support device according to the present invention. In FIG. 1, reference numeral 10 is a collision prevention support device for a land-based fixed station according to the present invention.
Including equipment. Reference numeral 1 is an alarm determination condition setting means according to the present invention, for example, an operating device 30 such as an external keyboard.
The size of the target that is connected to
It is possible to set Y = A · X + B, where A is a coefficient for multiplying the X by the warning determination value Y of the dangerous state at that time, and B is a constant. Reference numeral 2 denotes a target tracking means for performing target tracking by sequentially calculating future predicted positions of each target based on the position information of each target sequentially input from the land-based fixed station radar 20. There is a well-known means included in the conventional collision prevention device.

【0011】3は本発明に係る警報判別演算手段であ
り、前記物標追尾手段2が追尾中の物標の将来の予測位
置とその到達時間及びこれらに基づく物標間の今後の危
険状態を算出し、この算出した危険状態が前記警報判定
条件設定手段1に設定された危険状態の警報判定値Y以
下になるか否かの警報判別を行い、以下になると警報判
別した場合には、この判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を出
力するものである。4は警報表示処理手段であり、前記
警報判別演算手段3が衝突警報信号を出力したときに、
外部の表示器40に前記判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を
表示させるものである。
Reference numeral 3 denotes an alarm discrimination calculation means according to the present invention, which indicates a future predicted position of the target object being tracked by the target object tracking means 2 and its arrival time and a future dangerous state between the target objects based on these predicted positions. An alarm determination is made as to whether or not the calculated dangerous state is equal to or less than the alarm determination value Y of the dangerous state set in the alarm determination condition setting means 1. If the alarm determination value is less than this, the alarm determination is performed. The collision warning signal related to the discrimination target is output. Reference numeral 4 denotes an alarm display processing means, which is provided when the warning discrimination calculation means 3 outputs a collision warning signal,
The collision warning signal related to the discrimination target is displayed on the external display 40.

【0012】また固定局レーダ20は、例えば海岸近く
に設置され、湾内や海峡を監視対象領域として、この領
域内に存在する多数の各種物標を監視するものである。
そしてこのレーダ20が測定した各物標の位置情報を逐
次衝突予防支援装置10内の物標追尾手段2へ供給する
ものである。
Further, the fixed station radar 20 is installed, for example, near the coast, and monitors a large number of various targets existing in the bay or the strait as a monitoring target area.
Then, the position information of each target measured by the radar 20 is sequentially supplied to the target tracking means 2 in the collision prevention support device 10.

【0013】図2は物標の大きさを加味したCPAの警
報判定値の設定方法の説明図であり、図2を用いて具体
的な警報判定値の設定方法を説明する。この実施例にお
いて物標の大きさは、(1)物標が船舶の場合の船体長
と、(2)平面的な物標の面積から算出される物標の長
さの2つの場合について説明する。 (1)船体長を加味したCPAの警報判定値を設定する
例、 図1の警報判定条件設定手段1では、衝突のおそれのあ
る船舶の船体長を変数Xとしたときの新規の危険状態の
警報判定値をY、前記衝突のおそれのある2つの船舶の
船体長をLa,Lbとすると、この2つの船体長の平均
値L=(La+Lb)/2を前記変数Xとし、またこの
Xに乗算する係数をA(例えば2つの船舶の接近状況に
応じて設定される設定値)、従来の判定値をB(CPA
などの判定値、例えばB=100m)として、これらの
関係を次の(1)式で設定する。 Y=A・X+B ……(1) 上記(1)式により新たな警報判定値Yは可変設定値と
なり、2つの船舶の船体長の平均値に応じ、自動的に設
定値が変更される。
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a method of setting an alarm determination value of CPA in consideration of the size of the target. A specific method of setting the alarm determination value will be described with reference to FIG. In this embodiment, the size of the target is described in two cases, (1) the hull length when the target is a ship, and (2) the target length calculated from the planar area of the target. To do. (1) Example of setting alarm determination value of CPA in consideration of hull length, in the alarm determination condition setting means 1 of FIG. Assuming that the warning judgment value is Y and the hull lengths of the two ships that may be in collision are La and Lb, the average value L = (La + Lb) / 2 of these two hull lengths is the variable X, and this X is The coefficient to be multiplied is A (for example, a set value set according to the approaching situation of two ships), and the conventional determination value is B (CPA
And the like, for example, B = 100 m), and these relationships are set by the following equation (1). Y = A · X + B (1) The new alarm determination value Y becomes a variable set value according to the equation (1), and the set value is automatically changed according to the average value of the hull lengths of the two ships.

【0014】次にXの係数Aの設定例を説明する。この
例では、Xの係数Aは2つの船舶の接近状況に応じて設
定するものとして、(1)同航時には、A=0.5〜
1.3の範囲内において、(2)反航時には、A=1.
5〜2.5の範囲内において、(3)交差時には、A=
3.0〜4.0の範囲内において、2つの船舶間の相対
速度などの状況を考慮して係数値を設定する。上記船体
長の平均値Lは、予め設定されている場合はその設定値
を使用するが、予め設定されていない場合は、レーダ映
像等から算出した値を使用する。例えばA=0.5、B
=50mと設定したとすると、(1)式はY=L/2+
50となり、新たに2船の船体長の平均値Lと、2船の
接近状況に応じた係数A(=0.5)とを加味したCP
Aの警報判定値が得られる。また(1)式において、A
=0と設定すると、(1)式はY=Bとなり、従来の判
定値BによってCPAの警報判定ができる。
Next, an example of setting the coefficient A of X will be described. In this example, the coefficient A of X is set according to the approaching situation of two ships, and (1) A = 0.5 to
Within the range of 1.3, (2) A = 1.
Within the range of 5 to 2.5, at the time of (3) intersection, A =
Within the range of 3.0 to 4.0, the coefficient value is set in consideration of the situation such as the relative speed between two ships. As the average value L of the hull length, if it is set in advance, the set value is used, but if it is not set in advance, a value calculated from a radar image or the like is used. For example, A = 0.5, B
= 50m, the equation (1) is Y = L / 2 +
It becomes 50, and CP which newly added the average value L of the hull length of two ships and the coefficient A (= 0.5) according to the approach situation of the two ships
The alarm judgment value of A is obtained. In the formula (1), A
When = 0 is set, the equation (1) becomes Y = B, and the CPA alarm determination can be performed by the conventional determination value B.

【0015】(2)物標の面積から算出される物標の長
さを加味したCPAの警報判定値を設定する例、 港湾内の物標としては、例えば浚渫船や被曳航物体又は
ブイ等があり、これらは通常の自航能力のある船舶のよ
うに縦横比がほぼ一定の形状ではないため、これらの物
標については、まずレーダ映像から平面的な面積Sを求
める。次にこのSの平方根を求め、さらにこのSの平方
根に所定の係数αを乗算して、物標の長さを求める方法
が一般的である。このようにして2つの物標の一方又は
双方が通常の船舶でない場合にも、前記面積Sから求め
た物標の長さを船舶長の代りに使用し、衝突のおそれの
ある2物標の長さの平均値をXとし、前記A及びBを使
用すれば、同様に(1)式を用いてCPAの警報判定値
を可変設定することができる。
(2) An example of setting an alarm judgment value of CPA in consideration of the length of the target calculated from the area of the target. As the target in the port, for example, a dredger, a towed object or a buoy is used. However, since these do not have a shape with a substantially constant aspect ratio as in the case of a ship having normal self-propelling ability, a planar area S is first obtained from a radar image for these targets. Next, a method is generally used in which the square root of S is obtained, and the square root of S is further multiplied by a predetermined coefficient α to obtain the length of the target. In this way, even when one or both of the two targets is not a normal ship, the length of the target obtained from the area S is used instead of the ship length, and the two targets that may collide with each other are used. If the average value of the lengths is X and A and B are used, the alarm determination value of the CPA can be variably set using the equation (1).

【0016】なお上記実施例では、衝突のおそれのある
危険状態の警報判定値をCPAとして説明したが、これ
をTCPAとしても、またCPAとTCPAの両方とし
てもよい。また上記実施例では、前記(1)式の変数X
を物標の大きさから求めた長さの平均値や2つの船体長
の平均値とした場合の例を示したが、本発明はこれに限
定されるものではない。例えば衝突すると火炎や爆発の
危険度の大きい積み荷を有する船舶とそうでない船舶と
により、CPAやTCPAを可変設定できるように、積
み荷や船種を(1)式の変数Xとしてもよい。さらに例
えば、暗礁があったり潮流がはげしく操船が容易でない
海域とそうでない海域とで危険状態に差をつけたいと
か、2船間の相対速度の大小により衝突時の危険状態に
差をつけたい場合もあり、このような場合の危険状態を
示す警報判定値を(1)式の変数Xや係数Aによって可
変設定できるようにしてもよい。
In the above embodiment, the warning determination value in a dangerous state where there is a risk of collision has been described as CPA, but it may be TCPA or both CPA and TCPA. Further, in the above embodiment, the variable X in the equation (1) is
An example is shown in which is the average value of the lengths obtained from the size of the target or the average value of the two hull lengths, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the load and the ship type may be set as the variable X in the formula (1) so that the CPA and TCPA can be variably set depending on the ship having a cargo with a high risk of flame or explosion upon collision and the ship not having the danger. Furthermore, for example, if you want to make a difference in the dangerous state between sea areas where there are reefs or strong tidal currents and where it is not easy to maneuver, or where the relative speed between the two vessels is large or small. Therefore, the alarm determination value indicating the dangerous state in such a case may be variably set by the variable X or the coefficient A of the equation (1).

【0017】警報判定条件設定手段1には、上記のよう
にCPA等の警報判定値Y=A・X+Bがあらかじめ設
定される。警報判別演算手段3は、物標追尾手段2が追
尾中で衝突のおそれのある物標の将来の、例えば1分
後、2分後、3分後、…の予測位置と物標間の距離を逐
次算出してゆき、物標間の距離が最小となる距離(CP
A)を算出する。そしてこの算出値があらかじめ設定さ
れた警報判定値Y以下になるか否かを判別し、もしも以
下になる場合には、この判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を
出力する。この衝突警報信号は警報表示処理手段4を介
して表示器40に表示されると共に、無線送受信機等を
用いて衝突予防支援装置10から該当船舶に対して、衝
突を回避する操船処理を直ちにとるように連絡がなされ
る。
The alarm determination condition setting means 1 is preset with the alarm determination value Y = A · X + B such as CPA as described above. The alarm discrimination calculation means 3 is a distance between the predicted position and the target position of the target object which is in the possibility of collision while the target tracking means 2 is tracking, for example, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, ... Is calculated sequentially, and the distance (CP
A) is calculated. Then, it is determined whether or not the calculated value is equal to or less than a preset alarm determination value Y, and if it is less than or equal to the preset alarm determination value Y, a collision alarm signal related to the determination target is output. The collision warning signal is displayed on the display device 40 via the alarm display processing means 4, and the collision prevention support device 10 immediately takes a marine vessel maneuvering process for the relevant ship from the collision prevention support device 10 using a wireless transceiver or the like. Will be contacted.

【0018】従って固定局レーダ20の監視対象領域内
にある船舶は、自船に衝突予防装置を装備していなくと
も、陸上の衝突予防支援装置20からの支援通報によ
り、衝突回避処理をとることができる。またこの衝突予
防支援装置20は、前記のように衝突のおそれがある物
標の大きさや接近状態(交差、反航、同航)等の特殊状
況を加味した警報判定値を用いて警報判別を行うので、
従来よりも危険状態を正しく把握した判別結果により、
該当船舶の衝突予防を支援することができる。
Therefore, even if the ship in the area to be monitored by the fixed station radar 20 is not equipped with a collision prevention device, the collision avoidance process can be performed by the assistance notification from the land collision prevention support device 20. You can In addition, the collision prevention support device 20 determines an alarm by using an alarm determination value that takes into consideration special situations such as the size of a target that is likely to collide and the approaching state (crossing, backward flight, same flight) as described above. So do
By the judgment result that grasped the dangerous state more correctly than before,
It is possible to support the collision prevention of the relevant ship.

【0019】[0019]

【発明の効果】以上のように本発明によれば、陸上の固
定局レーダと結合され、前記レーダの監視対象領域内に
存在する複数の物標間の衝突予防を支援する装置におい
て、警報判定条件設定手段によって衝突のおそれのある
物標の大きさを変数Xとしたときの危険状態の警報判定
値Yを、前記Xに乗算する係数をA、常数をBとして、
Y=A・X+Bとして設定でき、物標追尾手段は前記固
定局レーダから逐次入力する各物標の位置情報に基づき
各物標の将来の予測位置を逐次算出して物標追尾を行
い、警報判別演算手段は前記物標追尾手段が追尾中の物
標の将来の予測位置とその到達時間及びこれらに基づく
物標間の今後の危険状態を算出し、この算出した危険状
態が前記警報判定条件設定手段に設定された危険状態の
警報判定値以下になるか否かの警報判別を行い、以下に
なると警報判別した場合には、この判別物標に係る衝突
警報信号を出力し、警報表示処理手段は前記警報判別演
算手段が衝突警報信号を出力したときに、外部の表示器
に前記判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を表示させるように
したので、衝突のおそれのある物標の大きさを加味した
警報判定値を用いて警報判別を行い、従来よりも危険状
態を正しく把握した判別情報により、該当船舶の衝突予
防を支援することができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, in a device which is coupled with a land-based fixed station radar and assists in preventing collision between a plurality of targets existing in the area to be monitored by the radar, an alarm determination is made. The coefficient X for multiplying the warning judgment value Y of the dangerous state when the size of the target object having a risk of collision by the condition setting means is a variable X is A, and the constant is B,
It can be set as Y = A · X + B, and the target tracking means sequentially calculates a future predicted position of each target based on the position information of each target sequentially input from the fixed station radar to perform target tracking and issue an alarm. The discrimination calculation means calculates the future predicted position of the target being tracked by the target tracking means and its arrival time and the future dangerous state between the targets based on these, and the calculated dangerous state is the alarm determination condition. An alarm judgment is made as to whether or not the warning judgment value set in the setting means is equal to or less than the danger judgment value. The means is adapted to, when the warning discrimination calculation means outputs the collision warning signal, display the collision warning signal relating to the discriminated target on an external display, so that the size of the target which may possibly collide is determined. Using the alarm judgment value with consideration Performs multi-address discrimination by than conventional correctly grasp the danger state determination information, it is possible to assist the collision prevention of the relevant vessels.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明に係る衝突予防支援装置の構成を示す図
である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a collision prevention support device according to the present invention.

【図2】物標の大きさを加味したCPAの警報判定値の
説明図である。
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of an alarm determination value of CPA in consideration of the size of a target.

【図3】従来のCPA及びTCPAの算出方法の説明図
である。
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a conventional CPA and TCPA calculation method.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 警報判定条件設定手段 2 物標追尾手段 3 警報判別演算手段 4 警報表示処理手段 10 衝突予防支援装置 20 固定局レーダ 30 操作器 40 表示器 1 Alarm Judgment Condition Setting Means 2 Target Tracking Means 3 Alarm Discrimination Calculating Means 4 Alarm Display Processing Means 10 Collision Prevention Support Equipment 20 Fixed Station Radar 30 Manipulator 40 Display

Claims (5)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 陸上の固定局レーダと結合され、前記レ
ーダの監視対象領域内に存在する複数の物標間の衝突予
防を支援する装置であって、 衝突のおそれのある物標の大きさを変数Xとしたときの
危険状態の警報判定値Yを、前記Xに乗算する係数を
A、常数をBとして、Y=A・X+Bとして設定できる
警報判定条件設定手段と、 前記固定局レーダから逐次入力する各物標の位置情報に
基づき各物標の将来の予測位置を逐次算出して物標追尾
を行う物標追尾手段と、 前記物標追尾手段が追尾中の物標の将来の予測位置とそ
の到達時間及びこれらに基づく物標間の今後の危険状態
を算出し、この算出した危険状態が前記警報判定条件設
定手段に設定された危険状態の警報判定値以下になるか
否かの警報判別を行い、以下になると警報判別した場合
には、この判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を出力する警報
判別演算手段と、 前記警報判別演算手段が衝突警報信号を出力したとき
に、外部の表示器に前記判別物標に係る衝突警報信号を
表示させる警報表示処理手段とを備えたことを特徴とす
る衝突予防支援装置。
1. A device, which is coupled with a land-based fixed station radar and supports collision prevention between a plurality of targets existing in a monitoring target area of the radar, the size of a target having a risk of collision. An alarm determination value Y in a dangerous state, where X is a variable X, and A is a coefficient for multiplying X, and B is a constant. Target tracking means that sequentially calculates the future predicted position of each target based on the position information of each target that is sequentially input, and future prediction of the target that is being tracked by the target tracking means. Whether or not the position and its arrival time and the future dangerous state between the targets based on these are calculated, and whether the calculated dangerous state is less than or equal to the warning judgment value of the dangerous state set in the warning judgment condition setting means The warning was judged, and the warning was judged when the following occurred. In this case, an alarm discrimination calculation means for outputting a collision warning signal relating to this discrimination target, and a collision warning relating to the discrimination target on an external display when the warning discrimination calculation means outputs a collision warning signal. A collision prevention support device comprising: an alarm display processing means for displaying a signal.
【請求項2】 前記危険状態の警報判定値Yを、衝突の
おそれのある物標間のCPAもしくはTCPAの一方又
は両方により設定することを特徴とする請求項1記載の
衝突予防支援装置。
2. The collision prevention support device according to claim 1, wherein the warning determination value Y of the dangerous state is set by one or both of CPA and TCPA between targets having a risk of collision.
【請求項3】 前記危険状態の警報判定値Yの変数X
を、衝突のおそれのある2つの船舶の船体長の平均値と
することを特徴とする請求項1又は請求項2記載の衝突
予防支援装置。
3. The variable X of the warning judgment value Y of the dangerous state
Is the average value of the hull lengths of two ships that are at risk of collision, and the collision prevention support device according to claim 1 or 2.
【請求項4】 前記危険状態の警報判定値Yの変数X
を、衝突のおそれのある2つの物標の面積から算出され
る長さの平均値とすることを特徴とする請求項1又は請
求項2記載の衝突予防支援装置。
4. A variable X of the warning judgment value Y of the dangerous state.
Is the average value of the lengths calculated from the areas of the two targets that are likely to collide, The collision prevention support device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein
【請求項5】 前記危険状態の警報判定値Yの変数Xの
係数Aを、衝突のおそれのある2つの船舶又は物標の接
近状況の同航時、反航時又は交差時のそれぞれの状況に
応じた値に設定することを特徴とする請求項1ないし請
求項4のいずれかに記載の衝突予防支援装置。
5. The coefficient A of the variable X of the warning judgment value Y of the dangerous state is set to the situation of the approaching situation of two ships or targets that are likely to collide, at the time of the same voyage, at the time of counter-going, or at the time of crossing. The collision prevention support device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the value is set to a value according to.
JP7034951A 1995-02-23 1995-02-23 Collision prevention support device Pending JPH08235500A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7034951A JPH08235500A (en) 1995-02-23 1995-02-23 Collision prevention support device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7034951A JPH08235500A (en) 1995-02-23 1995-02-23 Collision prevention support device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH08235500A true JPH08235500A (en) 1996-09-13

Family

ID=12428479

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP7034951A Pending JPH08235500A (en) 1995-02-23 1995-02-23 Collision prevention support device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH08235500A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11125675A (en) * 1997-10-23 1999-05-11 Japan Radio Co Ltd Automatic collision prevention aiding device
JPH11272999A (en) * 1998-03-24 1999-10-08 Tokimec Inc Device and method for supporting prevention of ship collision
JP2004145479A (en) * 2002-10-22 2004-05-20 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Device for providing peripheral vehicle information
JP2007147414A (en) * 2005-11-28 2007-06-14 Japan Radio Co Ltd Obstacle alarm device for vessel
KR101307174B1 (en) * 2013-05-07 2013-09-11 금호마린테크 (주) System for preventing collision of vessel in dangerous zone
KR101307179B1 (en) * 2013-05-07 2013-09-11 금호마린테크 (주) Apparatus for forecasting collision of ship and operating method thereof
KR101379340B1 (en) * 2012-06-08 2014-03-28 삼성중공업 주식회사 Device and method for transmitting video data regarding ship in dangerous situation

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11125675A (en) * 1997-10-23 1999-05-11 Japan Radio Co Ltd Automatic collision prevention aiding device
JPH11272999A (en) * 1998-03-24 1999-10-08 Tokimec Inc Device and method for supporting prevention of ship collision
JP2004145479A (en) * 2002-10-22 2004-05-20 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Device for providing peripheral vehicle information
JP2007147414A (en) * 2005-11-28 2007-06-14 Japan Radio Co Ltd Obstacle alarm device for vessel
KR101379340B1 (en) * 2012-06-08 2014-03-28 삼성중공업 주식회사 Device and method for transmitting video data regarding ship in dangerous situation
KR101307174B1 (en) * 2013-05-07 2013-09-11 금호마린테크 (주) System for preventing collision of vessel in dangerous zone
KR101307179B1 (en) * 2013-05-07 2013-09-11 금호마린테크 (주) Apparatus for forecasting collision of ship and operating method thereof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7047114B1 (en) System and apparatus for automatic and continuous monitoring, proactive warning and control of one or more independently operated vessels
Baldauf et al. Collision avoidance systems in air and maritime traffic
KR101693981B1 (en) Apparatus and method for vessel collision avoidance
JP2017054215A (en) Information display device and information display method
CN108897272A (en) Bank end intelligent monitoring system
JPH0922499A (en) Supporting device for collision avoiding navigation
JP6679665B2 (en) Collision Avoidance Method for Ships Using Psychological Characteristics of Navigators
KR101693982B1 (en) Apparatus and method for vessel collision avoidance
JP2012021947A (en) Navigation aid apparatus
CN103129720A (en) Anti-collision signal device of ship and method
WO2017051438A1 (en) Alarm device for ships
CN114241813A (en) Anti-collision early warning method, system and device between ships
CN115271502A (en) Method for preventing stranding and shallowing of ocean vessel
JPH08235500A (en) Collision prevention support device
KR20150124314A (en) Method for ship collision warning and accident situation records
KR20090036683A (en) Collision prevention system of a vessel
JP2005055257A (en) Harbor surveillance radar device
KR102142381B1 (en) Marin safety alarm system and method the same
JPH07129872A (en) Ship collision preventive sailing assistance device
JP7372370B2 (en) Information display device and information display method
JP2023181079A (en) Water-surface moving body vehicle collision warning apparatus and output method of collision warning signal
JP2905861B2 (en) Warning indicator for ship collision prevention
KR20130002566A (en) Coastal intelligent transport system
JPH09257918A (en) Navigation safety supporting device
CN216596549U (en) Ship collision prevention device