JPH0682426A - Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line - Google Patents

Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line

Info

Publication number
JPH0682426A
JPH0682426A JP4255615A JP25561592A JPH0682426A JP H0682426 A JPH0682426 A JP H0682426A JP 4255615 A JP4255615 A JP 4255615A JP 25561592 A JP25561592 A JP 25561592A JP H0682426 A JPH0682426 A JP H0682426A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
flaw
cutting
wire rod
flaw detection
detection
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP4255615A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Mitsuo Hebinuma
光男 蛇沼
Shoichi Akao
昇一 赤尾
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Aichi Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Aichi Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aichi Steel Corp filed Critical Aichi Steel Corp
Priority to JP4255615A priority Critical patent/JPH0682426A/en
Publication of JPH0682426A publication Critical patent/JPH0682426A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)
  • Milling, Broaching, Filing, Reaming, And Others (AREA)
  • Wire Processing (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To secure a user demand level about a flaw on a surface in on-line by detecting a flaw, which deeper than a cutting margin, by an eddy current flow detector before cutting, and after a sizing process. CONSTITUTION:A wire rod, which is produced by rolling, is sized and machined to meet such a size and size precision as to enable a flaw detection or cutting work as a following process to be carried out. After a sizing process, a flaw is detected by an eddy current flaw detector. Although there are some flaws, which are removable by cutting work in the following process, during this flow detection, the detection is carried out in the depth which is deeper than a cutting margin for the purpose of detecting a flaw which is not removable in cutting work. As the flaw remaining after cutting is large enough to be detected, the flaw can be detected surely even when the detection precision is reduced by vibration of the wire rod. In this way, the quality which meets the demand of a user can be secured by the inspection in the surface cutting work line.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、線材の表面を切削加工
する際に、同時に表面疵の検査が可能な、表面切削加工
ライン内における線材の探傷方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for flaw detection of a wire rod in a surface cutting line capable of simultaneously inspecting surface flaws when cutting the surface of the wire rod.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】熱間圧延により製造された線材の多く
は、表面切削(ピーリング等)、伸線等の二次加工が施
された後、冷間鍛造、切削等により目的とする形状の製
品に仕上げられる。特に、二次加工の後に冷間鍛造が施
される場合には、表面に疵が残存していると、限界加工
率が大きく低下して加工後に割れが発生し、製品として
使用できなくなる。また、二次加工後の表面がそのまま
製品として使用される場合にも、表面に疵が存在してい
ると、商品価値が下がるばかりでなく、製品としての強
度が低下して問題となる場合がある。
2. Description of the Related Art Most of the wire rods manufactured by hot rolling are products having a desired shape by cold forging and cutting after secondary processing such as surface cutting (peeling etc.) and wire drawing. Is finished. In particular, when cold forging is performed after secondary working, if a flaw remains on the surface, the critical working rate is greatly reduced, cracking occurs after working, and it cannot be used as a product. In addition, even when the surface after secondary processing is used as it is as a product, if there are flaws on the surface, not only the commercial value will decrease, but also the strength as a product will decrease, which may cause a problem. is there.

【0003】さらに、圧延ままの線材には、表面に脱炭
層が存在し、この脱炭層が最終製品に存在すると品質上
好ましくない。従って、以上の問題点を解決するため
に、線材は、熱間圧延後表面を切削加工して、疵、脱炭
層等の表面欠陥を除去するとともに、渦流探傷等の方法
で表面の疵を検査し、品質を確保する必要がある。
Furthermore, the as-rolled wire has a decarburized layer on its surface, and it is not preferable in terms of quality if this decarburized layer is present in the final product. Therefore, in order to solve the above problems, the wire rod is hot-rolled, and then the surface is cut to remove surface defects such as scratches and decarburized layers, and surface flaws are inspected by a method such as eddy current flaw detection. However, it is necessary to ensure quality.

【0004】前記渦流探傷等の疵検査工程においては、
全長に亘って検査する必要があり、また、ピーリング等
により表面を切削加工する際には、線材の振動や、切削
による表面肌の変化によって、探傷による疵検出精度が
大きく低下する。従って、疵の検査は、従来二次加工の
最終工程である引抜時に行われている。
In the flaw inspection process such as the eddy current flaw detection,
It is necessary to inspect over the entire length, and when the surface is cut by peeling or the like, the accuracy of flaw detection due to flaw detection greatly decreases due to vibration of the wire and change in the surface skin due to cutting. Therefore, the defect inspection is conventionally performed at the time of drawing, which is the final step of the secondary processing.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】引抜工程にて疵検査を
行う場合には、以下に示す問題がある。すなわち、線材
は、ユーザーの要望により、鋼材メーカーにて二次加工
の最終工程である引抜まで一括して行う場合と、ユーザ
ーにて引抜を行う場合とがある。また、鋼材メーカーに
て行う場合においても、外注業者に依頼して引抜を行う
場合とそうでない場合とがある。
Problems to be solved by the invention have the following problems when a flaw inspection is performed in the drawing process. That is, depending on the user's request, the wire rod may be collectively pulled up by the steel material manufacturer up to the final step of secondary processing, or may be pulled out by the user. Further, even when the steel material manufacturer performs the drawing, there are cases where the material is drawn out by requesting the subcontractor and cases where it is not.

【0006】このような状況で疵検査を行う場合には、
鋼材メーカー、外注業者、鋼材ユーザーの各工場に設置
された多数の引抜機1台毎に探傷装置を設置する必要が
生じ、多額の設備投資と保守費用が必要となる。また、
引抜加工が施されない線材製品の場合には、疵の保証を
することが困難になる。
When performing a flaw inspection in such a situation,
It is necessary to install a flaw detection device for each of a large number of drawing machines installed in steel mills, subcontractors, and steel mill factories, resulting in large capital investment and maintenance costs. Also,
In the case of a wire rod product that is not drawn, it is difficult to guarantee flaws.

【0007】以上の問題を解決するためには、引抜時以
外に全長疵検査が可能であるピーリング等の表面切削時
において、疵検査を実施せざるを得ない。すなわち、表
面切削加工は、引抜加工に比べユーザーや外注業者にて
行う比率が低いため、もし疵検査が可能となれば、少な
い探傷装置で疵検査を実施することが可能となって、設
備費用を抑えることができ、かつ鋼材メーカーでの品質
保証も容易となる。
In order to solve the above problems, it is unavoidable to carry out a flaw inspection at the time of surface cutting such as peeling, which allows a full length flaw inspection other than at the time of drawing. In other words, the ratio of surface cutting processing performed by users and outsourcers is lower than that of drawing processing, so if flaw inspection is possible, it will be possible to perform flaw inspection with a small number of flaw detectors, and equipment cost will be reduced. It is possible to suppress the problem and it becomes easy for the steel material manufacturer to guarantee the quality.

【0008】しかし、前述のように、ピーリング等の表
面切削加工時に疵検査を実施すると、加工による表面肌
の変化(ツールマーク等が生成する)と、切削加工中に
よる線材の振動等によって、探傷精度が大幅に低下する
ため、ユーザーより要求される疵深さの条件を保証する
ことができない。従って、現在は特に品質要求の厳しい
線材に対してのみ、2次加工の最終工程である引抜加工
時に渦流探傷機による疵検査を行っている。
However, as described above, if a flaw inspection is carried out during surface cutting such as peeling, a change in the surface skin due to the processing (a tool mark or the like is generated) and a vibration of the wire material during the cutting will cause flaw detection. Since the accuracy is greatly reduced, it is not possible to guarantee the flaw depth condition required by the user. Therefore, at present, the flaw inspection by the eddy current flaw detector is performed only at the time of drawing, which is the final step of the secondary processing, only for the wire material with which the quality is particularly required.

【0009】本発明は、前記した問題を解決し、表面疵
に関するユーザー要求レベルを確実に保証することがで
きる表面切削加工ライン内における線材の探傷方法を提
供することを目的とする。
It is an object of the present invention to solve the above-mentioned problems and to provide a flaw detection method for a wire rod in a surface cutting processing line, which can surely guarantee a user-required level regarding surface defects.

【0010】[0010]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明者等は、表面切削
加工ライン内で探傷を可能とする方法について検討を重
ねた。そして、切削後において疵が残るということは、
切削前において切削代分以上の深さの疵が存在していた
場合に限られると考えた。そこで、サイジング工程の後
で切削前の時点において、渦流探傷機によって切削代分
以上の深さの探傷を行い、その後切削加工を行った線材
について、再度疵の確認を行った。その結果、切削前の
検査によって切削後の疵の保証が可能であることを確認
し、本発明の完成に到ったものである。
Means for Solving the Problems The inventors of the present invention have conducted extensive studies on a method for enabling flaw detection within a surface cutting processing line. And the fact that a flaw remains after cutting means
It was considered to be limited to the case where a flaw having a depth equal to or greater than the cutting allowance was present before cutting. Therefore, after the sizing step and before the cutting, the flaw was confirmed again with respect to the wire rod which was subjected to flaw detection with a eddy current flaw detector to a depth equal to or more than the cutting allowance, and then subjected to the cutting process. As a result, it was confirmed by inspection before cutting that defects after cutting could be guaranteed, and the present invention was completed.

【0011】切削前の検査によって切削後の疵保証が可
能な理由は、次の通りである。切削加工の前後に関係な
く線材は振動しており、この振動が、探傷精度に悪影響
を与えることは、前述した通りである。しかし、切削後
に探傷する場合には、ユーザーの要求する品質(例えば
疵深さ0.05mm以下)の探傷精度が要求されるのに対し、
切削前においては、切削代より深い疵が探傷可能であれ
ば足りる(例えば、切削代が0.20mmの場合、0.25mm以上
の疵が検出できれば、疵深さ0.05mm以下を保証でき
る。)。従って、振動による探傷精度の低下を考えて
も、疵検査を正確に行うことができる。
The reason why flaws can be guaranteed after cutting by the inspection before cutting is as follows. The wire rod vibrates irrespective of before and after the cutting work, and this vibration has a bad influence on the flaw detection accuracy as described above. However, in the case of flaw detection after cutting, while the flaw detection accuracy of the quality required by the user (for example, a flaw depth of 0.05 mm or less) is required,
Before cutting, it is sufficient if flaws deeper than the cutting allowance can be detected (for example, if the cutting allowance is 0.20 mm, if a flaw of 0.25 mm or more can be detected, a flaw depth of 0.05 mm or less can be guaranteed). Therefore, the flaw inspection can be accurately performed even if the accuracy of flaw detection is lowered due to vibration.

【0012】以上の検討により得られた本発明である線
材の探傷方法は、線材の表面に存在する微小疵の有無を
検出しながら、表面の切削加工を行う方法であって、切
削加工前の線材を寸法精度向上のため中間寸法に仕上げ
るサイジング工程の後に、表面疵の有無を渦流探傷機に
より検査し、その後切削加工を施すことを特徴とする。
The wire rod flaw detection method of the present invention obtained by the above-described study is a method of cutting the surface of a wire rod while detecting the presence or absence of microscopic flaws on the surface of the wire rod. It is characterized in that after the sizing step of finishing the wire rod to an intermediate size for improving the dimensional accuracy, the presence or absence of surface flaws is inspected by an eddy current flaw detector, and then cutting is performed.

【0013】本発明では、バイトを線材のまわりに回転
させながら切削するピーリング加工や、皮むきダイスを
使って切削する方法等、線材表面を切削する全ての加工
方法を対象とする。
The present invention is intended for all processing methods for cutting the surface of a wire, such as a peeling process for cutting the cutting tool while rotating it around the wire and a method for cutting with a peeling die.

【0014】本発明において、探傷はサイジング工程の
後に行うことが必須である。圧延ままの寸法精度では探
傷が困難であるため、サイジング工程は、探傷を可能に
するために不可欠な工程となる。本発明におけるサイジ
ング加工の方法として、ローラや引抜ダイス等を使用す
る方法を用いることができる。
In the present invention, it is essential that flaw detection be performed after the sizing step. Since flaw detection is difficult with dimensional accuracy as rolled, the sizing step is an essential step for enabling flaw detection. As the sizing method in the present invention, a method using a roller, a drawing die or the like can be used.

【0015】本発明における探傷工程では、表面から切
削代分以上の深さを探傷することが必要である。従っ
て、線材の断面寸法、切削代に応じて、探傷コイルに流
す交流の周波数を適切に調整することが必要となる。
In the flaw detection process of the present invention, it is necessary to detect a flaw from the surface to a depth equal to or more than the cutting allowance. Therefore, it is necessary to appropriately adjust the frequency of the alternating current flowing in the flaw detection coil according to the cross-sectional dimension of the wire and the cutting allowance.

【0016】[0016]

【作用】本発明の方法では、まず圧延により製造された
線材をサイジング加工し、後工程である探傷や切削加工
が可能な寸法及び寸法精度に線材を加工する。そして、
サイジング工程の後に、渦流探傷機によって疵検査を行
う。この疵検査の時点では、後工程の切削によって除去
可能な疵も存在しているが、特に切削加工では除去でき
ない疵を検出することを目的として、表面から切削代分
以上の深さについて疵検査を行う。切削後においても残
る疵は切削前には十分に大きいので、線材の振動により
検査精度が低下しても、確実に検出することができる。
従って、表面切削加工ライン内での検査で、ユーザー要
求を満足する品質を保証することができる。
In the method of the present invention, first, the wire rod manufactured by rolling is subjected to the sizing process, and then the wire rod is processed to a dimension and a dimensional accuracy that allow flaw detection and cutting in the subsequent steps. And
After the sizing process, a flaw inspection is performed with an eddy current flaw detector. At the time of this flaw inspection, there are also flaws that can be removed by cutting in the post-process, but especially for the purpose of detecting flaws that cannot be removed by cutting, a flaw inspection is performed on the depth above the cutting allowance from the surface. I do. Since the flaws remaining after cutting are sufficiently large before cutting, even if the inspection accuracy deteriorates due to the vibration of the wire rod, it can be reliably detected.
Therefore, it is possible to guarantee the quality that satisfies the user's request by the inspection in the surface cutting processing line.

【0017】[0017]

【実施例】【Example】

【0018】以下、本発明の特徴を実施例でもって明ら
かにする。以下に説明する実験を行うために、電気炉溶
解し、熱間圧延にて製造された、高炭素クロム軸受鋼S
UJ2の線材を準備した。線材の線径は13.0mmである。
次に、前記線材を、その後の2次加工が可能な特性とす
るために、球状化焼鈍を施し、以下に示す試験の供試材
とした。
The features of the present invention will be described below with reference to examples. In order to perform the experiments described below, high carbon chromium bearing steel S produced by melting in an electric furnace and hot rolling was performed.
A UJ2 wire rod was prepared. The wire diameter of the wire is 13.0 mm.
Next, the wire rod was subjected to spheroidizing annealing so as to have a property capable of being subjected to subsequent secondary processing, and used as a test material for the test shown below.

【0019】試験は、前記供試材の表面にあらかじめ人
工疵をつけておき、人工疵のつけられた線材を渦流探傷
して、ピーリングによる表面切削後において残存する人
工疵を、探傷により検出可能かどうかを確認するという
方法で行った。また、本発明による効果を正確に確認す
るために、切削後に線材を探傷するという、従来の考え
方による探傷方法と、本発明による方法の両方について
試験を実施した。
In the test, artificial flaws are attached to the surface of the test material in advance, the wire with the artificial flaw is subjected to eddy current flaw detection, and the flaw remaining after the surface cutting by peeling can be detected by flaw detection. I went by the method of confirming whether or not. Further, in order to accurately confirm the effect of the present invention, tests were carried out on both the conventional flaw detection method of flaw detection on a wire after cutting and the method according to the present invention.

【0020】使用した渦流探傷機は、プローブ回転方式
の装置で、コイルとしてプローブコイルを使用し、その
検出有効幅は、2.5mm である。このプローブを9000r.p.
m.の速度で回転させながら、その回転の中心位置に供試
材を50m/min の速度で直進させて、前記人工疵がつけら
れた箇所の探傷を行った。なお、プローブに流す交流の
周波数は、300kHzとした。
The eddy current flaw detector used is a probe rotation type device, which uses a probe coil as a coil, and has a detection effective width of 2.5 mm. This probe is 9000r.p.
While rotating at a speed of m., the test material was moved straight to the center position of the rotation at a speed of 50 m / min to perform flaw detection on the portion having the artificial flaw. The frequency of the alternating current supplied to the probe was 300 kHz.

【0021】表面切削及び探傷時においては、供試材で
ある線材を、線径13.0mmから、サイジングによって12.6
mmに加工し、その後ピーリング加工によって、最終寸法
を12.2mm(切削代0.20mm)とした。従って、サイジング
により疵深さが変化しないと仮定すれば、切削前におい
て、0.20mmを超える深さの疵は、切削後においても残る
ことになる。また、人工疵の種類は、軸方向の角溝(ス
リット)とし、深さは0.25mm、0.30mm、0.35mmの3水準
として、切削後においても残存する深さに設定した。そ
して、それぞれの深さの疵を前記供試材表面のあらかじ
め決められた位置につけておき、前記した要領によって
試験を実施した。表1にその試験結果を示す。
At the time of surface cutting and flaw detection, a wire rod as a test material was used for 12.6 mm by sizing from a wire diameter of 13.0 mm.
Then, the final dimension was 12.2 mm (cutting allowance 0.20 mm) by processing to mm and then peeling. Therefore, assuming that the flaw depth does not change due to sizing, flaws having a depth of more than 0.20 mm before cutting will remain after cutting. Further, the type of artificial flaw was an axial square groove (slit), and the depth was set to three levels of 0.25 mm, 0.30 mm, and 0.35 mm, and the depth that remained after cutting was set. Then, the flaws of the respective depths were set at predetermined positions on the surface of the test material, and the test was carried out according to the procedure described above. Table 1 shows the test results.

【0022】[0022]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0023】表1において、○は検出が可能であったこ
とを示しており、×は検出ができなかったことを示して
いる。なお、表1に示した疵の深さは、ピーリングによ
る切削加工前の値である。
In Table 1, ◯ indicates that detection was possible, and x indicates that detection was not possible. The depths of the flaws shown in Table 1 are values before cutting by peeling.

【0024】表1から明らかなように、従来法では、切
削前における深さ0.35mm以上の疵(切削後において、深
さ0.15mm以上の疵に相当)しか検出できず、切削前にお
いて0.25mm、0.30mmの疵(切削後において、深さ0.05m
m、0.10mmの疵に相当)は、検出することができなかっ
た。この理由は、前述したように、ピーリング加工によ
って、線材が大きく振動している状態で探傷を行うた
め、検出感度が低下し、切削によって浅くなった疵につ
いては、検出できなかったためと考えられる。なお、試
験後の線材について、当初人工疵をつけた箇所につい
て、目視で確認を行った結果、全ての箇所に疵が残って
いるのが確認された。従って、従来の方法では、切削後
に残存する疵についても、見逃してしまうことになる。
それに対し、本発明の方法で探傷を行った場合には、前
記した全ての人工疵について、検出可能であることが確
認できた。
As is apparent from Table 1, the conventional method can detect only flaws having a depth of 0.35 mm or more before cutting (corresponding to flaws having a depth of 0.15 mm or more after cutting) and 0.25 mm before cutting. , 0.30mm flaw (after cutting, depth is 0.05m
m, equivalent to a 0.10 mm flaw) could not be detected. It is considered that this is because, as described above, the peeling process detects a flaw in a state where the wire material vibrates greatly, so that the detection sensitivity is lowered and the flaw which is shallow due to cutting cannot be detected. In addition, as for the wire rod after the test, as a result of visually confirming the places where the artificial flaws were initially attached, it was confirmed that the flaws remained at all the places. Therefore, in the conventional method, the flaws remaining after cutting are also overlooked.
On the other hand, when the flaw detection was performed by the method of the present invention, it was confirmed that all the artificial flaws described above could be detected.

【0025】本発明の方法では、サイジング直後の切削
加工前に探傷し、切削後の線材は検査しないので、最終
的な疵の有無を全く確認していないことになる。そこ
で、本発明による検査方法の信頼性を確認するために、
人工疵のつけ方(深さ、位置、数等)を変化させた線材
を製造し、本発明の探傷方法を前記実施例と同じ要領で
繰返し実施した。そして、探傷により検出できない疵が
存在したかどうかチェックするために、探傷結果を詳細
に分析した。その結果、切削後に存在する疵について
は、全て見逃しすることなく、検出されることが確認で
きた。
In the method of the present invention, flaw detection is performed immediately after sizing and before cutting, and the wire rod after cutting is not inspected. Therefore, it is not confirmed whether there is any final flaw. Therefore, in order to confirm the reliability of the inspection method according to the present invention,
Wires having different artificial flaws (depth, position, number, etc.) were manufactured, and the flaw detection method of the present invention was repeated in the same manner as in the above-mentioned Examples. Then, the flaw detection results were analyzed in detail in order to check whether there were any flaws that could not be detected by the flaw detection. As a result, it was confirmed that all defects existing after cutting could be detected without overlooking.

【0026】[0026]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明の探傷方法
は、サイジング加工後に、切削前における表面疵の有無
を、渦流探傷機により検査することによって、ピーリン
グ等の切削加工ライン内において表面疵の検査を実施す
ることが可能になった。本発明の開発により、従来のよ
うな引抜工程で疵検査する必要がなくなるため、ユーザ
ー、外注業者の所有する引抜機1台毎に探傷装置を設置
しなくても疵検査が可能となり、鋼材メーカーにより容
易に疵保証をすることができる。
As described above, according to the flaw detection method of the present invention, after sizing, the presence or absence of surface flaws before cutting is inspected by an eddy current flaw detector to remove surface flaws in a cutting line such as peeling. It became possible to carry out the inspection of. With the development of the present invention, since it is not necessary to perform a flaw inspection in the conventional drawing process, it is possible to perform a flaw inspection without installing a flaw detection device for each pulling machine owned by a user or an outsourcer. This makes it easier to guarantee defects.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 線材の表面に存在する微小疵の有無を検
出しながら、表面の切削加工を行う方法であって、 切削加工前の線材を寸法精度向上のため中間寸法に仕上
げるサイジング工程の後に、表面疵の有無を渦流探傷機
により検査し、その後切削加工を施すことを特徴とする
表面切削加工ライン内における線材の探傷方法。
1. A method of cutting a surface while detecting the presence or absence of microscopic flaws existing on the surface of the wire, the method comprising: a sizing step of finishing the wire before cutting into an intermediate dimension to improve dimensional accuracy. A method for flaw detection of a wire rod in a surface cutting processing line, which comprises inspecting for the presence of surface flaws with an eddy current flaw detector and then performing cutting processing.
JP4255615A 1992-08-31 1992-08-31 Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line Pending JPH0682426A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4255615A JPH0682426A (en) 1992-08-31 1992-08-31 Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4255615A JPH0682426A (en) 1992-08-31 1992-08-31 Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0682426A true JPH0682426A (en) 1994-03-22

Family

ID=17281210

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4255615A Pending JPH0682426A (en) 1992-08-31 1992-08-31 Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0682426A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5997396A (en) * 1996-07-22 1999-12-07 Nippon Conlux Co., Ltd. System and method for managing quantity of stored coins
JP2005164627A (en) * 2003-11-28 2005-06-23 Sumitomo Denko Steel Wire Kk Steel wire for musical instrument string, and its manufacturing method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5997396A (en) * 1996-07-22 1999-12-07 Nippon Conlux Co., Ltd. System and method for managing quantity of stored coins
JP2005164627A (en) * 2003-11-28 2005-06-23 Sumitomo Denko Steel Wire Kk Steel wire for musical instrument string, and its manufacturing method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1980345B1 (en) Production method for steel continuously cast piece and system for caring surface defect of cast piece
US8597075B2 (en) Method for detecting and/or preventing grind burn
US10213898B2 (en) Method for detecting and/or preventing grind burn
JP5036714B2 (en) Independent measuring device for grinding machines
CA2694470A1 (en) Process for the destruction-free testing of pipes
Lanzagorta et al. Experimental approach for a grinding burn in-process inspection system based on Eddy Current
KR20180115368A (en) Auto-mapping apparatus for surface defect of strip coil and method
US5811970A (en) Electromagnetic test for microstructure anomalies such as alpha-case, and for carbide precipitates and untempered and overtempered martensite
JPH0682426A (en) Flaw detection method for wire rod surface cutting work line
CN100578213C (en) Fault detection method of roller body chamfering
JP4598811B2 (en) Inspection method of steel balls
KR100832434B1 (en) Method for automatically controling o.r.g with the surface defect of strip
KR100836451B1 (en) Method for decreasing the amount of the surface defect by the roll mark in the hot roll process
JP2003315173A (en) Method for detecting residual stress in workpiece with eddy current tester using eddy current
JP2628278B2 (en) Method and apparatus for removing flaws in linear material
CN114509500A (en) Process for treating roller cracks
WO2020171185A1 (en) Method for grinding steel billet, method for manufacturing steel bar, and method for manufacturing wire rod
TWI546136B (en) Inspection method for hot rolled metal product
JP2003053420A (en) Manufacturing method of steel wire, intermediate working equipment train for wire rod and machine structural parts
SU744301A1 (en) Method of determining surface and subsurface defects of articles
CN115993434A (en) High-carbon steel inter-crystal oxidation detection method
CN118425291A (en) Magnetic mark evaluation method for magnetic powder detection of plug welding impeller weld joint
JP2004160511A (en) Method for removing surface flaw of steel plate
CN112748188A (en) Test method for detecting fatigue crack detection capability of axle of high-speed train by ultrasonic flaw detection
JPS5817352A (en) Debris detection of hot-rolled plate and deoxidized hot-rolled plate