JPH06335662A - Device for evaluating appearance of melon - Google Patents

Device for evaluating appearance of melon

Info

Publication number
JPH06335662A
JPH06335662A JP29250491A JP29250491A JPH06335662A JP H06335662 A JPH06335662 A JP H06335662A JP 29250491 A JP29250491 A JP 29250491A JP 29250491 A JP29250491 A JP 29250491A JP H06335662 A JPH06335662 A JP H06335662A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mesh
melon
meshes
basic
evaluation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP29250491A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Harumitsu Toki
治光 十亀
Toshio Okamura
寿夫 岡村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Iseki and Co Ltd
Iseki Agricultural Machinery Mfg Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Iseki and Co Ltd
Iseki Agricultural Machinery Mfg Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Iseki and Co Ltd, Iseki Agricultural Machinery Mfg Co Ltd filed Critical Iseki and Co Ltd
Priority to JP29250491A priority Critical patent/JPH06335662A/en
Publication of JPH06335662A publication Critical patent/JPH06335662A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Closed-Circuit Television Systems (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To attain the fairness in the evaluation of the mesh structure of melons and to lessen the manpower for this evaluation. CONSTITUTION:The image of the melon (a) is inputted S1 and after the meshes (stripes) of the melon are extracted S2 from this input image, plural pieces of the basic figures included in these extracted meshes are set S3. The number of the basic figures included in the extracted meshes is then calculated S4. In succession, the inclination of a straight line is determined S5 on logarithmic graphs by a method of least squares in accordance with the basic figures and the number of the basic figures included in the calculated meshes. The absolute value of the inclination of the straight line indicates fractal dimension and is the index of the intricateness of the structure of the meshes to be evaluated, i.e., the density of the meshes. The class of the melon is, thereupon, decided S7 according to the structure of the meshes by referring S6 to a table determining the relation between the inclination of this straight line and the classes of the melons.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、マスクメロン、夕張メ
ロン、アンデスメロンのように、表皮の表面に網目
(縞)を有するネット系メロンの網目の構造評価を行う
メロンの外観評価装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a melon appearance evaluation apparatus for evaluating the structure of a net-type melon such as musk melon, yubari melon and andes melon which has a mesh (stripes) on the surface of the epidermis.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】ネット系メロンでは、表面に形成された
網目の張りの良否が外観の品質要素として重要視されて
いる。そのため、従来は、メロンの網目の張り(網目の
構造の複雑さ)を検査員が目視によりいちいち観察して
評価していた。
2. Description of the Related Art In net melons, the quality of the mesh formed on the surface is regarded as an important quality factor for appearance. Therefore, conventionally, the inspector visually evaluates the mesh tension of the melon (complexity of the mesh structure) and evaluates it.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】このように従来は、メ
ロンの網目の張り具合を検査員がいちいち評価しなけれ
ばならないので、その評価にばらつきがあって公平性が
欠ける上に、その評価の省力化が望まれていた。
As described above, conventionally, since the inspector must evaluate the tension of the melon mesh, the evaluation is uneven and lacks fairness. Labor saving was desired.

【0004】そこで、本発明は、メロンの網目の構造評
価の公平性を達成するとともに、評価作業の省力化を達
成することを目的とする。
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to achieve fairness in the structure evaluation of the melon mesh and to save labor in the evaluation work.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】かかる目的を達成するた
めに本発明は、以下のように構成した。
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention has the following constitution.

【0006】すなわち、本発明は、網目を有するメロン
を撮影する撮像手段と、その撮影した画像からメロンの
網目を抽出する網目抽出手段と、その抽出した網目を構
成する基本図形が網目中に含まれる個数を算出する基本
図形個数算出手段と、前記基本図形と前記網目に含まれ
る基本図形の算出個数とから網目のフラクタル次元を求
めるフラクタル次元算出手段と、その求めたフラクタル
次元に基づいてメロンの網目の構造評価を行う網目評価
手段と、を備えてなる。
That is, according to the present invention, an image pickup means for photographing a melon having a mesh, a mesh extracting means for extracting a mesh of the melon from the photographed image, and a basic figure constituting the extracted mesh are included in the mesh. The number of basic figures to calculate the number of basic figures, the fractal dimension calculating means for calculating the fractal dimension of the mesh from the calculated number of basic figures included in the basic figure and the mesh, and the fractal dimension of the melon based on the calculated fractal dimension. And a mesh evaluation means for evaluating the structure of the mesh.

【0007】[0007]

【作用】本発明においては、撮像手段が網目を有するメ
ロンを撮影し、網目抽出手段はその撮影した画像から評
価対象であるメロンの網目を抽出する。基本図形個数算
出手段は、その抽出した網目を構成する基本図形が網目
中に含まれる個数を算出する。
In the present invention, the image pickup means photographs the melon having the mesh, and the mesh extracting means extracts the mesh of the melon to be evaluated from the photographed image. The basic figure number calculating means calculates the number of basic figures forming the extracted mesh included in the mesh.

【0008】フラクタル次元算出手段は、基本図形と網
目に含まれる基本図形の算出個数とから網目のフラクタ
ル次元を求める。この求めたフラクタル次元は、網目の
構造の複雑さ、換言すれば網目の緻密さの指標となる。
そこで、網目評価手段は、その求めたフラクタル次元に
基づいてメロンの網目の構造評価を行う。
The fractal dimension calculating means calculates the fractal dimension of the mesh from the basic figure and the calculated number of basic figures included in the mesh. The obtained fractal dimension is an index of the complexity of the mesh structure, in other words, the denseness of the mesh.
Therefore, the mesh evaluation means evaluates the structure of the melon mesh based on the obtained fractal dimension.

【0009】このように本発明では、メロンの網目の構
造にはフラクタル性があるという知見に基づき、網目の
フラクタル次元を求めて定量的に網目の構造評価を行う
ようにしたので、メロンの網目の構造評価の公平性の達
成できるとともに、その評価の省力化を達成できる。
As described above, in the present invention, based on the knowledge that the structure of the melon mesh has fractal properties, the fractal dimension of the mesh is obtained to quantitatively evaluate the structure of the melon. The fairness of the structural evaluation can be achieved and labor saving of the evaluation can be achieved.

【0010】[0010]

【実施例】以下、本発明の実施例について図面を参照し
て説明する。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

【0011】図1において、1は撮像素子などから構成
する画像入力装置であり、メロンaの側面を撮影するた
めにメロンaの側方に配置する。この画像入力装置1
は、カメラコントローラ2を介して画像処理装置3の入
力側に接続する。画像処理装置3はCPUやメモリなど
からなり、画像入力装置1からの入力画像を後述のよう
に所定の手順により所定の処理をする。画像処理装置3
の出力側には、画像出力装置として表示装置4を接続す
る。また、画像処理装置3は、システムコントローラ5
と接続する。
In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes an image input device composed of an image pickup device and the like, which is arranged laterally of the melon a in order to photograph the side surface of the melon a. This image input device 1
Is connected to the input side of the image processing apparatus 3 via the camera controller 2. The image processing device 3 includes a CPU, a memory, and the like, and performs a predetermined process on an input image from the image input device 1 in a predetermined procedure as described later. Image processing device 3
The display device 4 is connected as an image output device to the output side of. In addition, the image processing device 3 includes a system controller 5
Connect with.

【0012】次に、このように構成する実施例の画像処
理例について、図2のフローチャートを参照して説明す
る。
Next, an example of image processing of the embodiment thus constructed will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

【0013】まず、画像入力装置1が撮影するメロンa
の画像を入力する(S1)。次に、その入力画像からメ
ロンの網目(縞)を抽出したのち(S2)、その網目を
構成する基本図形を複数個設定する(S3)。この基本
図形は、例えば、4画素、16画素、64画素の正方形
とする。
First, the melon a photographed by the image input apparatus 1
Image is input (S1). Next, a melon mesh (stripes) is extracted from the input image (S2), and then a plurality of basic figures forming the mesh are set (S3). This basic figure is, for example, a square of 4, 16 or 64 pixels.

【0014】次いで、例えば図3で示すようにその基本
図形と網目との重なり(斜線部)により、抽出した網目
に含まれる基本図形の個数を算出する(S4)。いま、
基本図形を4画素、16画素、64画素とし、これら各
基本図形(基本図形の1辺の長さr)を横軸に、網目に
含まれるその各基本図形の個数N(r)を横軸にとる
と、図4または図5で示すような測定結果が得られる。
Next, for example, as shown in FIG. 3, the number of basic figures included in the extracted mesh is calculated by the overlap (hatched portion) of the basic figure and the mesh (S4). Now
The basic figures are 4, 16, and 64 pixels, and each of these basic figures (the length r of one side of the basic figure) is on the horizontal axis, and the number N (r) of each of the basic figures included in the mesh is on the horizontal axis. By taking the above, the measurement result as shown in FIG. 4 or 5 is obtained.

【0015】このグラフ中に示すパーセンテイジは、網
目に含まれる基本図形の割合を示し、例えば図3のよう
な場合にはその割合は75%になる。なお、図4はメロ
ンの網目が全体的に密の場合であり、図5はその網目が
全体的に粗の場合である。
The percentage shown in this graph indicates the ratio of the basic figures included in the mesh. For example, in the case of FIG. 3, the ratio is 75%. It should be noted that FIG. 4 shows a case where the mesh of the melon is wholly dense, and FIG. 5 shows a case where the mesh is wholly rough.

【0016】引き続き、第4図または第5図で示すよう
な結果に基づき、最小2乗法により両対数グラフ上で直
線の傾きを求める(S5)。この直線の傾きの絶対値は
フラクタル次元を示し、評価する網目の構造の複雑さ、
すなわち網目の緻密さの指標となる。そこで、その直線
の傾きとメロンの等級との関係を定めたテーブルを参照
し(S6)、網目の構造に応じてメロンの等級が判定さ
れる(S7)。
Subsequently, based on the result shown in FIG. 4 or 5, the slope of the straight line is obtained on the log-log graph by the least square method (S5). The absolute value of the slope of this straight line indicates the fractal dimension, and the complexity of the mesh structure to be evaluated,
That is, it is an index of the fineness of the mesh. Then, the table that defines the relationship between the inclination of the straight line and the grade of melon is referred to (S6), and the grade of melon is determined according to the mesh structure (S7).

【0017】次にメロンの外観評価を、上記のように求
めるメロンの網目構造の他に、メロンの表皮の凹凸、お
よび網目(縞)の盛り上がり等の複数の評価要素を用い
て総合的に行う方法について、以下に説明する。
Next, the appearance of the melon is evaluated comprehensively by using a plurality of evaluation factors such as the unevenness of the skin of the melon and the rise of the mesh (stripes) in addition to the mesh structure of the melon obtained as described above. The method will be described below.

【0018】この方法では、メロンの網目構造は上述の
ようにフラクタル次元で数値化し、メロンの表皮の凹凸
はメロンの表面に対するレーザ照射により得られる図形
の変形度により数値化し、縞の盛り上がりはメロンの表
面の変位を測定することにより数値化しておく。
In this method, the network structure of the melon is quantified by the fractal dimension as described above, the unevenness of the skin of the melon is quantified by the degree of deformation of the figure obtained by laser irradiation on the surface of the melon, and the rise of stripes is the melon. It is quantified by measuring the displacement of the surface.

【0019】そして、これらの数値化した値に基づき、
ファジィ推論を用いてメロン外観の総合評価を行う。す
なわち、ファジィルールの前件部として評価要素である
メロンの網目構造(X1)、メロンの表皮の凹凸(X
2)、および網目の盛り上がり(X3)とし、その後件
部を総合評価値(Y)とする。そして、以下で示すよう
なファジィルールを用いてファジィ推論し、メロンの外
観の総合評価を行う。
Then, based on these digitized values,
Perform a comprehensive evaluation of melon appearance using fuzzy reasoning. That is, as the antecedent part of the fuzzy rule, the mesh structure of the melon (X1), which is the evaluation element, the unevenness of the skin of the melon (X
2) and the swelling of the mesh (X3), and then the consequent part is the comprehensive evaluation value (Y). Then, fuzzy inference is performed using the fuzzy rules as shown below, and a comprehensive evaluation of the appearance of the melon is performed.

【0020】以下に、ファジィルールの一例を示す。An example of fuzzy rules will be shown below.

【0021】{IF X1=ZO,X2=ZO,X3=
ZO THEN Y=ZO すべて同じであれば優であ
る} {IF X1=NS X2=ZO,X3=ZO THE
N Y=ZO 網目が少し弱くても他が同じであれば優
である} {IF X1=PS,X2=ZO,X3=ZO THE
N Y=PS 網目が密であると他が同じでも良に格下
げ} 以上のような評価法によれば、複数の評価要素に基づい
てメロンの外観評価を総合的に行うようにしたので、検
査者が目視による観察に基づいて行うと同様の総合評価
を定量的、かつ安定的に行うことができる。
{IF X1 = ZO, X2 = ZO, X3 =
ZO THEN Y = ZO is excellent if all are the same} {IF X1 = NS X2 = ZO, X3 = ZO THE
N Y = ZO Even if the mesh is slightly weak, it is excellent if everything else is the same} {IF X1 = PS, X2 = ZO, X3 = ZO THE
N Y = PS Even if everything else is the same if the mesh is dense, it is well downgraded} With the above evaluation method, the appearance of the melon was evaluated comprehensively based on multiple evaluation factors. It is possible to quantitatively and stably perform the same comprehensive evaluation as that performed by a person based on visual observation.

【0022】[0022]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明によれば、メ
ロンの網目の構造にはフラクタル性があるという知見に
基づき、網目のフラクタル次元を求めて定量的に網目の
構造を評価するようにしたので、メロンの網目の構造評
価の公平性の達成できるとともに、その評価の省力化を
達成できる。
As described above, according to the present invention, the fractal dimension of the mesh is obtained and the structure of the mesh is quantitatively evaluated based on the knowledge that the structure of the melon mesh has fractal properties. Therefore, the fairness of the structure evaluation of the melon mesh can be achieved, and the labor saving of the evaluation can be achieved.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施例の構成を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】その実施例の画像処理例を示すフローチャート
である。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an image processing example of the embodiment.

【図3】網目と基本図形との関係を説明する図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a relationship between a mesh and a basic figure.

【図4】基本図形と、網目に含まれるその基本図形の個
数との関係の一例を示すグラフである。
FIG. 4 is a graph showing an example of a relationship between a basic figure and the number of the basic figure included in a mesh.

【図5】基本図形と、網目に含まれるその基本図形の個
数との関係の他の一例を示すグラフである。
FIG. 5 is a graph showing another example of the relationship between the basic figure and the number of the basic figure included in the mesh.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

a メロン 1 画像入力装置 3 画像処理装置 4 表示装置 a Melon 1 Image input device 3 Image processing device 4 Display device

【手続補正書】[Procedure amendment]

【提出日】平成4年8月28日[Submission date] August 28, 1992

【手続補正1】[Procedure Amendment 1]

【補正対象書類名】明細書[Document name to be amended] Statement

【補正対象項目名】0016[Correction target item name] 0016

【補正方法】変更[Correction method] Change

【補正内容】[Correction content]

【0016】引き続き、図4または図5で示すような結
果に基づき、最小2乗法により両対数グラフ上で直線の
傾きb/a(図6参照)を求める(S5)。この直線の
傾きの絶対値はフラクタル次元を示し、評価する網目の
構造の複雑さ、すなわち網目の緻密さの指標となり、そ
の値が大きい方が網目が複雑である。そこで、その直線
の傾きとメロンの等級との関係を定めたテーブルを参照
し(S6)、網目の構造に応じてメロンの等級が判定さ
れる(S7)。ところで、上記のようにメロンの網目が
全体的に密のときにはす4で示すようなテータが得ら
れ、メロンの網目が全体的に粗のときには図5で示すよ
うなデータが得られる。そこで、図6で示すように、ス
テップS5で求めた直線と、あらかじめ設定した縦軸に
平行な直線cとで交わる交点を求め、その交点から横軸
に平行に移動した縦軸の値eにより、網目の密度を評価
できる。この値eは、大きいほど網目は密である。
Subsequently, based on the result shown in FIG . 4 or 5 , the slope b / a (see FIG. 6) of the straight line is obtained on the logarithmic log graph by the method of least squares (S5). Absolute value of the slope of the straight line represents the fractal dimension, the complexity of the structure of the mesh cells for evaluation, i.e. Ri Do indicative of compactness of the mesh, its
The larger the value of, the more complicated the mesh . Then, the table that defines the relationship between the slope of the straight line and the grade of melon is referred to (S6), and the grade of melon is determined according to the mesh structure (S7). By the way, as mentioned above, the melon mesh
When the whole is dense, the data shown by chair 4 is obtained.
When the melon mesh is coarse as shown in Fig. 5,
Such data can be obtained. Therefore, as shown in FIG.
The straight line obtained in step S5 and the preset vertical axis
Find the intersection that intersects with the parallel straight line c, and from that intersection, the horizontal axis
The density of the mesh is evaluated by the value e on the vertical axis that has moved parallel to
it can. The larger the value e, the denser the mesh.

【手続補正2】[Procedure Amendment 2]

【補正対象書類名】明細書[Document name to be amended] Statement

【補正対象項目名】図6[Name of item to be corrected] Figure 6

【補正方法】追加[Correction method] Added

【補正内容】[Correction content]

【図6】 網目の評価法を説明するための図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining a mesh evaluation method.

【手続補正3】[Procedure 3]

【補正対象書類名】図面[Document name to be corrected] Drawing

【補正対象項目名】図6[Name of item to be corrected] Figure 6

【補正方法】追加[Correction method] Added

【補正内容】[Correction content]

【図6】 [Figure 6]

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (51)Int.Cl.5 識別記号 庁内整理番号 FI 技術表示箇所 H04N 7/18 B ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (51) Int.Cl. 5 Identification code Office reference number FI technical display location H04N 7/18 B

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】網目を有するメロンを撮影する撮像手段
と、 その撮影した画像からメロンの網目を抽出する網目抽出
手段と、 その抽出した網目を構成する基本図形が網目中に含まれ
る個数を算出する基本図形個数算出手段と、 前記基本図形と前記網目に含まれる基本図形の算出個数
とから網目のフラクタル次元を求めるフラクタル次元算
出手段と、 その求めたフラクタル次元に基づいてメロンの網目の構
造評価を行う網目評価手段と、 を備えてなるメロンの外観評価装置。
1. An image pickup means for photographing a melon having a mesh, a mesh extracting means for extracting a mesh of the melon from the photographed image, and a number of basic graphics constituting the extracted mesh included in the mesh. And a fractal dimension calculating means for obtaining the fractal dimension of the mesh from the basic figure and the calculated number of basic figures included in the mesh, and the structure evaluation of the melon mesh based on the obtained fractal dimension. An apparatus for evaluating the appearance of melon, comprising:
JP29250491A 1991-10-11 1991-10-11 Device for evaluating appearance of melon Withdrawn JPH06335662A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP29250491A JPH06335662A (en) 1991-10-11 1991-10-11 Device for evaluating appearance of melon

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP29250491A JPH06335662A (en) 1991-10-11 1991-10-11 Device for evaluating appearance of melon

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH06335662A true JPH06335662A (en) 1994-12-06

Family

ID=17782675

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP29250491A Withdrawn JPH06335662A (en) 1991-10-11 1991-10-11 Device for evaluating appearance of melon

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH06335662A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10331575A (en) * 1997-05-30 1998-12-15 Fujita Corp Method for anticipating nature of soil in front of tunnel working face
JP2003281550A (en) * 2002-12-04 2003-10-03 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Surface evaluation device and moving device
JP2005030861A (en) * 2003-07-10 2005-02-03 Casio Comput Co Ltd Device and program for person management
JP2010067255A (en) * 2008-08-11 2010-03-25 Chaos Technical Research Laboratory Apparatus or method for determining degree of buying intention
CN106426643A (en) * 2016-08-29 2017-02-22 上海交通大学 Method for sorting broken plastics in waste household appliances through near infrared absorption spectroscopy analysis device

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10331575A (en) * 1997-05-30 1998-12-15 Fujita Corp Method for anticipating nature of soil in front of tunnel working face
JP2003281550A (en) * 2002-12-04 2003-10-03 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Surface evaluation device and moving device
JP2005030861A (en) * 2003-07-10 2005-02-03 Casio Comput Co Ltd Device and program for person management
JP2010067255A (en) * 2008-08-11 2010-03-25 Chaos Technical Research Laboratory Apparatus or method for determining degree of buying intention
CN106426643A (en) * 2016-08-29 2017-02-22 上海交通大学 Method for sorting broken plastics in waste household appliances through near infrared absorption spectroscopy analysis device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ghimpeţeanu et al. A decomposition framework for image denoising algorithms
EP1173749B1 (en) Image editing for preparing a texture analysis
DE102004004528A1 (en) Stereo image processing method for measuring parallax between stereo images to determine 3D position coordinates of image objects, wherein both parallax and a parallax reliability factor are determined
CN110660074B (en) Method for establishing steel scrap grade division neural network model
CN113793333B (en) Defect picture generation method and device applied to industrial quality inspection
CN113012157B (en) Visual detection method and system for equipment defects
CN112651894A (en) Image deblurring algorithm for generating countermeasure network based on RRDB
JP2004007621A (en) Method and system for analyzing picture quality of display device using fractal dimension
CN111882555A (en) Net detection method, device, equipment and storage medium based on deep learning
JPH06335662A (en) Device for evaluating appearance of melon
CN112348808A (en) Screen perspective detection method and device
DE102019100011B4 (en) Process for 3D reconstruction of an object
JP2004246618A (en) Method, device, and program for generating image used for collating in pattern recognition and pattern recognition using the image
JP2004350212A (en) System and method for image processing
CN107368690A (en) The preprocess method and device of medical image picture
WO2008056305A1 (en) Noise reduction of an image signal
KR102242011B1 (en) Apparatus for classifying livestock-products image grade based on deep-learning
CN114862762A (en) Quality evaluation method and device for human body scanning image
Ukovich et al. A tool based on the co-occurrence matrix to measure the performance of dynamic range reduction algorithms
JP3088654B2 (en) Image quality measurement method
CN112837389A (en) Object model construction method and device and electronic equipment
CN113627302B (en) Ascending construction compliance detection method and system
CN111243054B (en) Slice data processing method, device and equipment
CN110232671B (en) Image visual effect enhancement method based on image tonality
JPH05118824A (en) External-appearance evaluating apparatus for melon

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 19990107