JPH06119370A - Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration - Google Patents

Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration

Info

Publication number
JPH06119370A
JPH06119370A JP26733592A JP26733592A JPH06119370A JP H06119370 A JPH06119370 A JP H06119370A JP 26733592 A JP26733592 A JP 26733592A JP 26733592 A JP26733592 A JP 26733592A JP H06119370 A JPH06119370 A JP H06119370A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
calculated
period
data
complaints
cases
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP26733592A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yukio Kitamura
幸雄 北村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sanyo Electric Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Sanyo Electric Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sanyo Electric Co Ltd filed Critical Sanyo Electric Co Ltd
Priority to JP26733592A priority Critical patent/JPH06119370A/en
Publication of JPH06119370A publication Critical patent/JPH06119370A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To provide a Weibull analyzing method capable of executing automatically prediction in which the survival rate of a product is taken into consideration and the number of the cases of the occurrence of a claim is universal when only observed data is inputted. CONSTITUTION:In order to execute the long-term prediction of the number of the cases of the occurrence of the claim by Weibull distribution from the remaining number of products data NOi and the number of the abandoned products NGi of every arbitrary using period ti and number of cases of claim data ni due to a fault etc., a significant level period Ki is calculated by standardizing the using period ti, and probability to satisfy the significant level period Ki in the whole using period (t) is calculated as the survival rate Pi by probability distribution, and corrected number of cases of claim data ni not taking abandonment into consideration is calculated from the number of cases of claim data ni, and a cumulative failure rate F(i) in each using period ti is calculated from this data, and an approximate value F(i)' is calculated from the value of this failure rate in each time ti by a prescribed approximating method, and the number of cases of claim ni' in the using period DELTAti is calculated, and the numb of cases of claim ni''' in the using period DELTAti to take the survival rate into consideration is calculated by using the survival rate Pi.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は長期にわたって使用され
る製品の信頼性を判断する尺度となる将来の累積故障率
を算出するワイブル解析方法に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a Weibull analysis method for calculating a future cumulative failure rate which is a measure for judging the reliability of products used for a long period of time.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】例えば品質管理の分野では従来から製品
の信頼性の指標として故障寿命による統計的解析手法が
良く用いられている。
2. Description of the Related Art In the field of quality control, for example, a statistical analysis method based on failure life has been often used as an index of product reliability.

【0003】一般に信頼性に限らず同じ性質を持った同
一ロットで製造された製品について、その特性や寿命を
観測し、その分布から確率的な情報を得たり、決定を行
うということが行われている。この場合ごく少数の製品
しかない場合でも、同じ品質を持った母集団を想定し、
そこから限られたサンプルを抽出してこのサンプルにつ
いて信頼度、故障寿命などの信頼性特性値や品質特性を
観測し、元の母集団の性質を推定する必要が生じる。し
たがって当然サンプルが少ない時にはサンプルから求め
られた特性値は確率的に母集団の持っている特性値とは
異なった値になる。
Generally, not only reliability but also products manufactured in the same lot having the same properties are observed for their characteristics and lifespans, and probabilistic information is obtained from their distributions or decisions are made. ing. In this case, assuming a population with the same quality, even if there are only a few products,
It is necessary to extract a limited sample from the sample, observe reliability characteristic values such as reliability and failure life and quality characteristics of this sample, and estimate the characteristics of the original population. Therefore, naturally, when the number of samples is small, the characteristic value obtained from the sample stochastically differs from the characteristic value of the population.

【0004】とりわけ製品の故障によるクレームの発生
件数から当該製品の信頼性を推定しようとする場合、普
通クレーム発生件数はワイブル分布に準じるもののその
サンプル数は製品の台数(母集団)に比べて極めて小さ
い値であり、従来ワイブル確率紙を用いた目視による確
率的データの近似を用いて将来のクレーム発生件数の予
測を行っていた。なおワイブル解析紙を用いた推定の方
法については昭和63年3月4日第2刷発行の日科技連
信頼性工学シリーズ第4巻「信頼性における確率紙のつ
かい方」塩見 弘、三はし 武、斉藤 元雄、益田 昭
彦共著、(株)日科技連出版社発行に詳しく説明されて
いる。
In particular, when trying to estimate the reliability of the product from the number of complaints due to product failure, the number of complaints usually follows the Weibull distribution, but the number of samples is much larger than the number of products (population). This is a small value, and the number of future complaints has been predicted using the approximation of probabilistic data by visual observation using Weibull probability paper. For the estimation method using Weibull analysis paper, please refer to Nikkan Giren Reliability Engineering Series Vol. 4 "How to Use Probability Paper in Reliability" published by the second printing on March 4, 1988 Hiroshi Shiomi, Mihashi Takeshi, Motoo Saito, and Akihiko Masuda co-authored by Nikka Giren Publishing Co., Ltd.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上述のごとくワイブル
確率紙を用いた目視によるよる確率的データの近似は、
その目視を行う人によってデータのプロットのやり方や
近似のための直線の引き方に個人差があり、再現性がな
いという欠点があった。
The approximation of the probabilistic data by visual observation using the Weibull probability paper as described above is as follows.
There is a drawback in that there is no reproducibility because there are individual differences in the method of plotting data and how to draw a straight line for approximation depending on the person who visually observes it.

【0006】また製品には夫々寿命があり、クレームが
発生するまでに廃棄されるものもあって長期にわたるク
レーム発生件数の推測を行う場合には母集団の数が変化
して、正確なクレーム発生件数を推定できないという問
題点があった。
Further, since each product has a life span and some are discarded before a complaint occurs, the number of population changes when estimating the number of complaints over a long period of time, so that an accurate complaint is generated. There was a problem that the number of cases could not be estimated.

【0007】本発明は係る従来技術の問題点に鑑みてな
されたものであり、観測データのインプットを行えば自
動的に製品残存率を考慮したクレームの発生件数の予測
が行え、且つその予測が普遍的となるワイブル解析方法
を提供することを目的とするものである。
The present invention has been made in view of the problems of the related art. When the observation data is input, the number of complaints can be automatically predicted in consideration of the product residual rate, and the prediction can be made. The purpose is to provide a universal Weibull analysis method.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、任意の使用期
間ti 毎の残存台数データNOi、廃棄台数NGi及び故障
等によるクレームのついた製品の台数であるクレーム件
数データni からワイブル分布を用いて当該製品に係る
クレーム発生件数の長期予測を行うに際し、前記使用期
間ti
The present invention SUMMARY OF] The remaining number data N Oi for each arbitrary period of use t i, from waste number N Gi and a failure such as a product of the number marked with the claim by the number of complaints data n i when performing long-term prediction of the claim incidence according to the product with the Weibull distribution, the use period t i

【0009】[0009]

【数6】 [Equation 6]

【0010】により基準化して有意水準期間Ki を算出
し、全使用期間tにおける前記有意水準期間Ki を満た
す確率を所定の確率分布により残存率Pi として算出
し、前記クレーム件数データni から
The significance level period K i is calculated by standardization according to the above, and the probability of satisfying the significance level period K i in all usage periods t is calculated as the residual rate P i by a predetermined probability distribution, and the claim count data n i is calculated. From

【0011】[0011]

【数7】 [Equation 7]

【0012】より廃棄を考慮しない補正クレーム件数デ
ータni ’を算出し、前記補正クレーム件数データn
i ’を用いて
Further, the amended complaint number data n i ′ which does not consider disposal is calculated, and the amended complaint number data n
using i '

【0013】[0013]

【数8】 [Equation 8]

【0014】により各使用期間ti における累積故障率
F(i)を算出し、前記累積故障率F(i)の各時間t
i における値から所定の近似法により直線近似して近似
値F(i)’を算出し、所定の使用期間Δtおけるクレ
ーム件数ni ”を
The cumulative failure rate F (i) in each usage period t i is calculated by the following, and each time t of the cumulative failure rate F (i) is calculated.
The approximate value F (i) ′ is calculated by linearly approximating the value in i by a predetermined approximation method, and the number of complaints n i ″ in a predetermined use period Δt is calculated.

【0015】[0015]

【数9】 [Equation 9]

【0016】により算出し、前記残存率Pi を用いて使
用期間Δti における残存率を考慮したクレーム件数n
i'''を
The number of complaints n calculated in accordance with the above, and using the remaining rate P i in consideration of the remaining rate in the usage period Δt i
i '''

【0017】[0017]

【数10】 [Equation 10]

【0018】により算出するものである。It is calculated by

【0019】[0019]

【作用】上記構成によれば、たとえ予測期間の途中で製
品の廃棄があっても、これを考慮に入れたクレーム発生
件数の長期予測が行え、且つその値は再現性のある信頼
度の高いものとなる。
According to the above configuration, even if the product is discarded during the prediction period, the number of complaints can be predicted for a long time taking this into consideration, and the value is reproducible and highly reliable. Will be things.

【0020】[0020]

【実施例】以下本発明ワイブル解析方法の一実施例につ
いて図面を用いて詳細に説明する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the Weibull analysis method of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings.

【0021】図1、図2はクレーム発生件数の長期予測
を行うためのアルゴリズムを示すものである。
FIGS. 1 and 2 show an algorithm for long-term prediction of the number of complaints.

【0022】まずステップS1で観測された生産台数N
P (NP =NOi+NGi、ただしNOiは使用期間ti にお
ける残存台数、NGiは同じく廃棄台数である)、使用期
間t i 、クレーム発生件数ni 、平均使用期間x、標準
偏差s、及び予測したいと考えている期間Δtを入力す
る。ここで平均使用期間x、標準偏差sは製品によって
あらかじめ算出されているデータ及びこのデータを補間
して求めたデータを用いアルゴリズムの中では固定の値
(例えばx=6[年]、s=2.5[年])とする。
First, the production number N observed in step S1
P (NP = NOi+ NGi, But NOiIs the period of use ti To
Number of remaining cars, NGiIs also the number of discarded units)
Interval t i , Number of complaints ni , Average usage period x, standard
Enter the deviation s and the period Δt you want to predict.
It Here, the average usage period x and standard deviation s depend on the product.
Pre-calculated data and interpolation of this data
Fixed value in the algorithm using the data obtained by
(For example, x = 6 [year], s = 2.5 [year]).

【0023】また、観測された生産台数NP は100
[台]とし、使用期間ti 、クレーム発生件数ni の抽
出データは例えば次の表1のようなものである。
The observed production number N P is 100
[Table], and the extracted data of the usage period t i and the number of complaint occurrences n i are as shown in Table 1 below.

【0024】[0024]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0025】この入力はiの個数(例えば表1ではi=
5)だけ行われ、入力が済めばステップS2へ進む。
This input is the number of i (for example, in Table 1, i =
Only 5) is performed, and when input is completed, the process proceeds to step S2.

【0026】ステップS2は後に用いるワイブル分布に
適合させるための使用期間ti の基準化を行い有意水準
i を算出する部分である。これは次の数11を用いて
算出し、一つのiについて算出を終えるとステップS3
へ進む。
Step S2 is a part for calculating the significance level K i by normalizing the use period t i for fitting to the Weibull distribution to be used later. This is calculated using the following equation 11, and when the calculation is completed for one i, step S3
Go to.

【0027】[0027]

【数11】 [Equation 11]

【0028】ステップS3は前記ステップS2で求めた
有意水準Ki において製品が残存する確率Pi を算出す
る部分である。この時の算出方法は種々の確率分布を用
いて行っても良いが、確率Pi がここでは正規分布に従
うものとして残存率Pi を各iについて算出する。そし
て一つのPi の算出が終わればステップS4へ進む。
Step S3 is a part for calculating the probability P i of the product remaining at the significance level K i obtained in step S2. The calculation method at this time may be performed using various probability distributions, but the probability P i here follows a normal distribution, and the residual rate P i is calculated for each i. When the calculation of one P i is completed, the process proceeds to step S4.

【0029】ステップS4では前記残存率Pi を用い
て、残存率を考慮したクレーム発生件数の補正値ni
を次の数12によって算出する。
In step S4, the residual rate P i is used to correct the number of complaints in consideration of the residual rate n i '
Is calculated by the following equation 12.

【0030】[0030]

【数12】 [Equation 12]

【0031】このようにしてステップS2〜S4で全て
のiについて補正されたクレーム発生件数ni ’を算出
するとステップS5へ進む。
When the number of complaint occurrences n i 'corrected for all i is calculated in steps S2 to S4 in this way, the process proceeds to step S5.

【0032】ステップS5は前記補正されたクレーム発
生件数ni ’から使用期間ti における累積故障率F
(i)を次の数13によって算出する部分である。
In step S5, the cumulative failure rate F in the usage period t i is calculated from the corrected number of complaint occurrences n i ′.
This is a part for calculating (i) by the following equation 13.

【0033】[0033]

【数13】 [Equation 13]

【0034】ここで求めた累積故障率F(i)は理想的
にはワイブル分布に従う値であることが望ましい。そこ
でステップS6に進んで、ここでワイブル分布から外れ
る値をワイブル分布に従うような値に近似する。このた
めの演算手法としては例えば最小自乗法による近似手法
を用いれば良い。このステップS6の操作は従来のワイ
ブル確率紙にデータをプロットして目視で直線を引く操
作に相当する部分である。
The cumulative failure rate F (i) obtained here is ideally a value according to the Weibull distribution. Therefore, the process proceeds to step S6, and the value deviating from the Weibull distribution is approximated to a value that follows the Weibull distribution. As a calculation method for this purpose, for example, an approximation method based on the method of least squares may be used. The operation of step S6 corresponds to a conventional operation of plotting data on a Weibull probability sheet and visually drawing a straight line.

【0035】このようにしてワイブル分布に従う近似累
積故障率F(i)’が算出されると、ステップS7に進
んで予測時間Δt(=ti −ti-1 )におけるクレーム
発生件数ni ”を予測時間の前後の近似累積故障率F
(i)’、F(i−1)’を用いて数14により算出す
る。
When the approximate cumulative failure rate F (i) 'according to the Weibull distribution is calculated in this way, the process proceeds to step S7 and the number of complaint occurrences n i "at the prediction time Δt (= t i -t i-1 )". Is the approximate cumulative failure rate F before and after the prediction time
(I) 'and F (i-1)' are used to calculate by Equation 14.

【0036】[0036]

【数14】 [Equation 14]

【0037】ここで算出されたクレーム発生件数ni
は製造した製品が全数残っている時のクレーム発生件数
になっているから次のステップS8へ進んで前記残存率
iを用いて次の数15により残存率を考慮したクレー
ム発生件数ni ''' を算出する。
The number of complaint occurrences n i ″ calculated here
Is the number of complaints when all the manufactured products remain, the process proceeds to the next step S8, and the number of complaints n i 'considering the remaining rate by the following equation 15 using the remaining rate P i. '' Is calculated.

【0038】[0038]

【数15】 [Equation 15]

【0039】これが目的とする予測クレーム発生件数と
なる。必要に応じてこの予測クレーム発生件数ni'''を
あらかじめ用意しておいたディスプレイ上のワイブル解
析紙にプロットしたり、あるいはテーブル上に出力した
りする。
This is the target expected number of complaints. If necessary, the predicted number of complaints n i ′ ″ is plotted on the Weibull analysis paper on the display prepared in advance or output on the table.

【0040】表2は残存率を考慮しないで予測クレーム
発生件数を算出した時の値と表3は残存率を考慮して予
測クレーム発生件数を算出した時の値を示している。ま
た、図3は残存率を考慮してワイブル解析紙に値をプロ
ットした時のチャート、図4は同じ観測データを用いて
残存率を考慮しない時のチャートを示している。
Table 2 shows the values when the predicted number of complaints is calculated without considering the residual rate, and Table 3 shows the values when the predicted number of complaints is calculated considering the residual rate. Further, FIG. 3 shows a chart when the values are plotted on the Weibull analysis paper in consideration of the residual rate, and FIG. 4 shows a chart when the residual rate is not considered using the same observation data.

【0041】[0041]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0042】[0042]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0043】上記表2と表3を比較すれば明らかなよう
に残存率を考慮しないと予測期間が遠い将来に向かうほ
どいくらでもクレーム発生件数が増加していくのに対
し、残存率を考慮に入れるとti が11以上で飽和し、
以後クレーム発生は出ないことになり、通常の製品に対
してはある期間が過ぎれば市場に製品が残らないため、
残存率を考慮する方が理にかなっていると言える。
As is clear from the comparison between Tables 2 and 3, if the residual rate is not taken into consideration, the number of complaints will increase as the prediction period goes far into the future, while the residual rate is taken into consideration. And t i are saturated at 11 or more,
After that, complaints will not occur, and for regular products, the products will not remain in the market after a certain period of time,
It makes more sense to consider the survival rate.

【0044】そして同じ観測データを用いても図3と図
4を比べれば明らかなように、得られる予測クレーム発
生件数の増加率(図の傾き)が、双方で大きく違ってく
ることに気がつくであろう。このように残存率を考慮し
ない従来の方法では非常に信頼度の低い予測クレーム発
生件数を算出していたことになり、本実施例によって精
度の高い予測が行えることは製品の製造計画に大きな貢
献が期待できる。
Even if the same observation data is used, as is apparent from comparison between FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, it is noticed that the increase rate (gradient in the figure) of the number of predicted complaints obtained greatly differs between the two. Ah In this way, the conventional method that does not consider the residual rate would have calculated the number of predicted complaints with extremely low reliability, and the fact that this example makes highly accurate predictions greatly contributes to product manufacturing planning. Can be expected.

【0045】[0045]

【発明の効果】以上の説明のごとく本発明によれば市場
の製品残存率を考慮したワイブル解析による予測クレー
ム発生件数の算出が、従来と同様の観測データの入力に
より自動的に行え、その算出値は条件が同じなら一意的
に決まり、現状に即した信頼度の高いものとなるため、
製品の製造計画や部品の保管管理計画等の有用なデータ
となる効果が期待できる。
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to automatically calculate the predicted number of complaints by the Weibull analysis in consideration of the product residual rate in the market by inputting the observation data as in the conventional case. The value is uniquely determined if the conditions are the same, and it will be highly reliable in accordance with the current situation.
It is expected that the data will be useful data such as product manufacturing plans and parts storage management plans.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明による予測クレーム発生件数を算出する
ためのアルゴリズムを示すフローチャートの前半部分で
ある。
FIG. 1 is a first half of a flowchart showing an algorithm for calculating a predicted number of complaints generated according to the present invention.

【図2】上記図1のアルゴリズムに続くフローチャート
の後半部分である。
FIG. 2 is the latter half of the flowchart following the algorithm of FIG.

【図3】残存率を考慮しない時のワイブル確率紙上への
予測クレーム発生件数の出力状況を示すチャートであ
る。
FIG. 3 is a chart showing an output situation of a predicted number of complaints generated on Weibull probability paper when the residual rate is not taken into consideration.

【図4】残存率を考慮した本発明によるワイブル確率紙
上への予測クレーム発生件数の出力状況を示すチャート
である。
FIG. 4 is a chart showing an output situation of predicted number of complaint occurrences on Weibull probability paper according to the present invention in consideration of remaining rate.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 任意の使用期間ti 毎の残存台数データ
Oi、廃棄台数NGi及び故障等によるクレームのついた
製品の台数であるクレーム件数データni からワイブル
分布を用いて当該製品に係るクレーム発生件数の長期予
測を行うに際し、 前記使用期間ti を 【数1】 により基準化して有意水準期間Ki を算出し、 全使用期間tにおける前記有意水準期間Ki を満たす確
率を所定の確率分布により残存率Pi として算出し、 前記クレーム件数データni から 【数2】 より廃棄を考慮しない補正クレーム件数データni ’を
算出し、 前記補正クレーム件数データni ’を用いて 【数3】 により各使用期間ti における累積故障率F(i)を算
出し、 前記累積故障率F(i)の各時間ti における値から所
定の近似法により直線近似して近似値F(i)’を算出
し、 所定の使用期間Δtおけるクレーム件数ni ”を 【数4】 により算出し、 前記残存率Pi を用いて使用期間Δti における残存率
を考慮したクレーム件数ni'''を 【数5】 により算出することを特徴とする製品の市場残存率を考
慮したワイブル解析方法。
1. The number of remaining data N Oi for each arbitrary use period t i , the number N Gi of discarded products, and the number n i of complaint products, which is the number of products with complaints due to breakdown, etc., are assigned to the product using a Weibull distribution. When making a long-term prediction of the number of such complaints, the use period t i is calculated as follows: And normalized to calculate the significance level period K i by the probability of meeting the significance level period K i in the whole use period t is calculated as a residual ratio P i by a predetermined probability distribution, Equation from the number of complaints data n i 2] The corrected complaint number data n i ′ that does not consider discarding is calculated, and the corrected complaint number data n i ′ is used to calculate Then, the cumulative failure rate F (i) in each usage period t i is calculated, and the approximate value F (i) ′ is linearly approximated from the value of the cumulative failure rate F (i) at each time t i by a predetermined approximation method. Is calculated, and the number of complaints n i ”in a predetermined use period Δt is calculated as follows: And the number of complaints n i ′ ″ in consideration of the remaining rate in the usage period Δt i is calculated by using the above remaining rate P i. A Weibull analysis method that considers the market survival rate of the product, which is calculated by
JP26733592A 1992-10-06 1992-10-06 Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration Pending JPH06119370A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP26733592A JPH06119370A (en) 1992-10-06 1992-10-06 Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP26733592A JPH06119370A (en) 1992-10-06 1992-10-06 Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH06119370A true JPH06119370A (en) 1994-04-28

Family

ID=17443394

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP26733592A Pending JPH06119370A (en) 1992-10-06 1992-10-06 Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH06119370A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6647371B2 (en) * 2001-02-13 2003-11-11 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method for predicting a demand for repair parts
EP1363211A2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2003-11-19 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for predicting a demand for repair parts
US6751574B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2004-06-15 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for predicting a demand for repair parts
JP2013114636A (en) * 2011-12-01 2013-06-10 Tokyo Gas Co Ltd Maintenance support system, maintenance support method and program
CN105205002A (en) * 2015-10-28 2015-12-30 北京理工大学 Modeling method of software safety defect discovering model based on test workload
CN108763654A (en) * 2018-05-03 2018-11-06 国网江西省电力有限公司信息通信分公司 A kind of electrical equipment fault prediction technique based on Weibull distribution and hidden Semi-Markov Process

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6647371B2 (en) * 2001-02-13 2003-11-11 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method for predicting a demand for repair parts
US6751574B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2004-06-15 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for predicting a demand for repair parts
EP1363211A2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2003-11-19 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for predicting a demand for repair parts
WO2003096244A1 (en) * 2002-05-13 2003-11-20 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for predicting demand for repair component
EP1363211A3 (en) * 2002-05-13 2004-06-23 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for predicting a demand for repair parts
JP2013114636A (en) * 2011-12-01 2013-06-10 Tokyo Gas Co Ltd Maintenance support system, maintenance support method and program
CN105205002A (en) * 2015-10-28 2015-12-30 北京理工大学 Modeling method of software safety defect discovering model based on test workload
CN105205002B (en) * 2015-10-28 2017-09-29 北京理工大学 A kind of software safety defect based on test job amount finds the modeling method of model
CN108763654A (en) * 2018-05-03 2018-11-06 国网江西省电力有限公司信息通信分公司 A kind of electrical equipment fault prediction technique based on Weibull distribution and hidden Semi-Markov Process

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ditzen et al. Testing and estimating structural breaks in time series and panel data in Stata
US10248528B2 (en) System monitoring method and apparatus
Hayo et al. Do Federal Reserve communications help predict federal funds target rate decisions?
WO2021072890A1 (en) Traffic abnormality monitoring method and apparatus based on model, and device and storage medium
US7243049B1 (en) Method for modeling system performance
CN110278121B (en) Method, device, equipment and storage medium for detecting network performance abnormity
WO2021073343A1 (en) Method and apparatus for analyzing root cause of failure of communication system, system and computer storage medium
US20150254791A1 (en) Quality control calculator for document review
JP5867349B2 (en) Quality prediction apparatus, operation condition determination method, quality prediction method, computer program, and computer-readable storage medium
US7617313B1 (en) Metric transport and database load
JP6588862B2 (en) Customer service system, operator skill judgment method and operator skill judgment program
CN111967655A (en) Short-term load prediction method and system
JPH06119370A (en) Weibull analyzing method marked survival rate of product taken into consideration
US20150227530A1 (en) Address Book Ranking Method and Apparatus
US20170300837A1 (en) Business operation evaluation system
US11392437B1 (en) Cold start and adaptive server monitor
JP6625839B2 (en) Load actual data determination device, load prediction device, actual load data determination method, and load prediction method
CN113424119A (en) Work efficiency evaluation method, work efficiency evaluation device, and program
JP2004078780A (en) Method, device, and program for prediction, and recording medium recording the prediction program
JPH09233700A (en) Method of evaluating reliability on estimation of day maximum demand power
JP5522060B2 (en) Quality prediction apparatus, operation condition determination method, quality prediction method, computer program, and computer-readable storage medium
US11636001B2 (en) Method and system for determining an error threshold value for machine failure prediction
CN111966966A (en) Method and system for analyzing feasible domain of sensor measurement error model parameters
CN111327442A (en) Complaint early warning threshold value obtaining method and device based on control chart
JP2020071493A (en) Result prediction device, result prediction method and program