JPH05257723A - Program fault analyzing system - Google Patents

Program fault analyzing system

Info

Publication number
JPH05257723A
JPH05257723A JP4052124A JP5212492A JPH05257723A JP H05257723 A JPH05257723 A JP H05257723A JP 4052124 A JP4052124 A JP 4052124A JP 5212492 A JP5212492 A JP 5212492A JP H05257723 A JPH05257723 A JP H05257723A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
procedure
analysis
failure
fault
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP4052124A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yuuichi Yukibuchi
雄一 雪渕
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Solution Innovators Ltd
Original Assignee
NEC Solution Innovators Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NEC Solution Innovators Ltd filed Critical NEC Solution Innovators Ltd
Priority to JP4052124A priority Critical patent/JPH05257723A/en
Publication of JPH05257723A publication Critical patent/JPH05257723A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To facilitate new registration and addition as well without necessity for complicated programming by registering a fault analyzing means on a data base as a procedure using simple language. CONSTITUTION:This system is provided with a fault analyzing means 1I to analyze a fault, information collecting means 1J to collect information, and procedure registering means 1H to make the fault analyzing means 1I and the information collecting means 1J into a procedure and to register this procedure on the data base while defining the simple language enabling a description to instruct the execution of information collection/fault analysis from fault log information IC and a description to instruct the collection/fault analysis of timely required information by being activated under the environment of reproducing a program generating the fault. Then, a fault analysis procedure 1A is prepared by describing a series of fault analyzing means 1I based on the use of the simple language and registered on a procedure storage data base 1B by using the procedure registering means 1H.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明はプログラム障害解析方式
に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a program failure analysis method.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来のプログラム障害解析は、熟練者ま
たはマニュアルを参照しての人手による作業が主であ
り、またプログラムの性質上、人手による解析が困難な
場合には、解析手段を組込んだ障害解析プログラムを作
成し、この障害解析プログラムを利用することにより行
なっていた。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventional program failure analysis is mainly performed by a skilled person or manually with reference to a manual, and if the analysis of the program is difficult due to the nature of the program, an analysis means is incorporated. It was done by creating a failure analysis program and using this failure analysis program.

【0003】図2は従来の障害解析プログラムを使用し
た一例を示すフローチャートである。
FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing an example using a conventional failure analysis program.

【0004】まず、すでに明らかになっている障害解析
手段を高級言語を用いて記述し、障害解析プログラム2
Kを作成する。
First, the already known failure analysis means is described using a high-level language, and the failure analysis program 2
Create K.

【0005】続いて障害解析プログラム2Kを起動し、
障害ログ情報2Cを解析する。解析が成功すれば、障害
解析結果2Dを出力して処理を終了するが、解析できな
かった場合は、あとの作業、すなわち情報収集および障
害解析はすべて人手での作業となる。
Then, the failure analysis program 2K is started,
The failure log information 2C is analyzed. If the analysis is successful, the failure analysis result 2D is output and the processing is terminated. However, if the analysis cannot be performed, the subsequent work, that is, information collection and failure analysis, are all manual work.

【0006】ここで情報収集する際は、まず障害ログ情
報2Cより必要な情報を得るが、不足している時は、障
害が発生したプログラムそのものを修正してトレース情
報、ダンプ情報を得ることになる。
When collecting information, the necessary information is first obtained from the fault log information 2C, but when it is insufficient, the faulty program itself is modified to obtain trace information and dump information. Become.

【0007】最後に障害解析プログラム2Kを修正して
新たな障害解析手段を作り込む。
Finally, the failure analysis program 2K is modified to create a new failure analysis means.

【0008】[0008]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上述した従来のプログ
ラム障害解析方式では、以下に示す欠点がある。
The above-mentioned conventional program failure analysis method has the following drawbacks.

【0009】(1) 人手による解析を行なう場合 解析をできる能力をもったメンバでなければ解析ができ
ない。
(1) Manual Analysis Only members with the ability to perform analysis can perform analysis.

【0010】(2) 障害解析プログラムを利用して解析を
行なう場合 解析手段をプログラミングする際に複雑なロジックを作
成する必要がある。
(2) When using a failure analysis program for analysis It is necessary to create a complicated logic when programming the analysis means.

【0011】解析対象となるプログラムが複数存在する
場合、それぞれに対応して障害解析プログラムを用意す
る必要がある。
When there are a plurality of programs to be analyzed, it is necessary to prepare a failure analysis program corresponding to each of them.

【0012】組込まれた解析手段で解析できない場合、
人手による解析を行なうために、障害ログ情報より必要
な情報を収集するために別のツールを用意したり、さら
に障害が発生したプログラムそのものを修正する必要が
ある。
When the built-in analysis means cannot analyze,
In order to perform manual analysis, it is necessary to prepare another tool to collect necessary information from the failure log information, and further to correct the program in which the failure has occurred.

【0013】[0013]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明のプログラム障害
解析方式は、障害を解析する障害解析手段と、情報を収
集する情報収集手段と、障害ログ情報から情報収集/障
害解析を行なうことを指示する記述と、障害が発生した
プログラムを再現する環境下で起動し、タイムリーに必
要な情報の収集/障害解析を行なうことを指示する記述
とができる簡易言語を定義して、前記障害解析手段およ
び前記情報収集手段を手続き化し、この手続きをデータ
ベースに登録する手続き登録手段とを有する。
According to a program failure analysis method of the present invention, failure analysis means for analyzing a failure, information collection means for collecting information, and information collection / fault analysis from failure log information are instructed. And the failure analysis means are defined, and a simple language capable of instructing to start in an environment for reproducing the program in which the failure has occurred and to perform necessary information collection / failure analysis in a timely manner is defined. And a procedure registration means for converting the information collecting means into a procedure and registering the procedure in a database.

【0014】[0014]

【実施例】次に本発明について図面を参照して説明す
る。
The present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

【0015】図1は本発明の一実施例を示すフローチャ
ートである。
FIG. 1 is a flow chart showing an embodiment of the present invention.

【0016】障害ログ情報の中からどの情報を基にどの
ような解析を行なうか、また障害ログ情報の中に解析に
必要な情報が不足しているい場合は、障害が発生したプ
ログラムを起動してダイナミックに情報を収集するとい
った一連の障害解析手段を簡易言語の使用に基づいて記
述した障害解析手続き1Aを作成し手続き登録手段1H
を用いて手続き格納データベース1Bに登録する。この
際、障害解析手段が複数存在する場合は、対応する障害
解析手続きを作成し登録しておく。
If what kind of analysis is to be performed based on what information is included in the failure log information, or if there is insufficient information necessary for analysis in the failure log information, start the program in which the failure has occurred. Failure analysis procedure 1A in which a series of failure analysis means for dynamically collecting information based on the use of a simple language is created, and procedure registration means 1H is created.
Is used to register in the procedure storage database 1B. At this time, when there are a plurality of failure analysis means, a corresponding failure analysis procedure is created and registered.

【0017】次に障害解析手段1Iを用いて障害解析を
行なう。障害解析手段1Iは手続き格納データベース1
Bに登録された障害解析手続きを順次取出し、障害を正
しく解析できるまで、もしくは障害解析手続きがなくな
るまで障害解析処理を繰返す。
Next, failure analysis is performed using the failure analysis means 1I. The failure analysis means 1I is the procedure storage database 1
The failure analysis procedure registered in B is sequentially taken out, and the failure analysis processing is repeated until the failure can be correctly analyzed or the failure analysis procedure is exhausted.

【0018】取出した障害解析手続きを基に解析を行な
った結果、正しく解析できた場合、障害解析結果1Dを
出力して処理を終了するが、不可能な場合は登録された
次の障害解析手続きを取出し処理を続ける。ここですべ
ての障害解析手続きを駆使しても解析できない場合は解
析不可能であると判断し終了する。
As a result of the analysis based on the extracted failure analysis procedure, if the analysis is successful, the failure analysis result 1D is output and the processing ends, but if it is not possible, the next failure analysis procedure registered. The removal process is continued. If all the failure analysis procedures cannot be used for analysis, it is determined that analysis is not possible and the processing ends.

【0019】解析不可能となった場合には、人手による
解析となるため、まず情報収集作業を行なう。このため
に障害ログ情報1Cより解析に必要などの情報をどのよ
うにして収集するか、もし障害ログ情報1Cの中に必要
な情報が存在しない場合、障害が発生したプログラムを
起動して収集するといった一連の処理として情報収集手
段を簡易言語の仕様に基づいて手続き化して情報収集手
続き1Eを作成し、手続き登録手段1Hを用いて手続き
格納データベース1Bに登録する。
When the analysis becomes impossible, the analysis is performed manually, so that the information collecting work is performed first. For this reason, how to collect information necessary for analysis from the failure log information 1C, or if necessary information does not exist in the failure log information 1C, start up the program in which the failure has occurred and collect it. As a series of processes, the information collecting means is proceduralized based on the specification of the simple language to create the information collecting procedure 1E, and is registered in the procedure storing database 1B using the procedure registering means 1H.

【0020】次に情報収集手段1Jを用いて情報収集結
果1Fを取得し、人手により障害解析を行なう。これら
一連の作業を解析が終了するまで繰返し、解析が終了し
たらこの解析作業の過程で得た障害解析手段を障害解析
手続き1Gとして作成し、手続き登録手段1Hで追加登
録しておく。
Next, the information collection means 1J is used to acquire the information collection result 1F, and the failure analysis is performed manually. These series of operations are repeated until the analysis is completed, and when the analysis is completed, the failure analysis means obtained in the course of this analysis operation is created as a failure analysis procedure 1G and additionally registered by the procedure registration means 1H.

【0021】[0021]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明は簡易言語を
用いて障害解析手段を手続きとしてデータベースに登録
することにより、複雑なプログラミングをする必要がな
く新規に登録する際も追加する際も容易にできる。
As described above, according to the present invention, the failure analysis means is registered in the database as a procedure by using a simple language, so that complicated programming is not required and new registration and addition are easy. You can

【0022】また、解析対象プログラムが複数存在して
も、対応したデータベースを用意しておけばデータベー
スを替えるだけで解析することができる。
Further, even if there are a plurality of analysis target programs, if a corresponding database is prepared, the analysis can be performed simply by changing the database.

【0023】さらに、障害解析手続きおよび情報収集手
続きに、上述したように解析対象プログラムそのものを
ダイナミックに起動して情報収集/障害解析を行なうこ
とを指示する記述ができるため、最後に障害収集を行な
うまで解析対象プログラムを変更する必要がない。
Further, since the failure analysis procedure and the information collection procedure can be described as instructing to dynamically start the analysis target program itself to perform the information collection / fault analysis as described above, the failure collection is finally performed. There is no need to change the analysis target program.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の一実施例を示すフローチャートであ
る。
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】従来の例を示すフローチャートである。FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a conventional example.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1A 障害解析手続き 1B 手続き格納データベース 1C 障害ログ情報 1D 障害解析結果 1E 情報収集手続き 1F 情報収集結果 1G 障害解析手続き 1H 手続き登録手段 1I 障害解析手段 1J 情報収集手段 2C 障害ログ情報 2D 障害解析結果 2F 情報収集結果 2K 障害解析プログラム 1A Failure analysis procedure 1B Procedure storage database 1C Failure log information 1D Failure analysis result 1E Information collection procedure 1F Information collection result 1G Failure analysis procedure 1H Procedure registration means 1I Failure analysis means 1J Information collection means 2C Failure log information 2D Failure analysis result 2F Information Collection results 2K failure analysis program

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 障害を解析する障害解析手段と、 情報を収集する情報収集手段と、 障害ログ情報から情報収集/障害解析を行なうことを指
示する記述と、障害が発生したプログラムを再現する環
境下で起動し、タイムリーに必要な情報の収集/障害解
析を行なうことを指示する記述とができる簡易言語を定
義して、前記障害解析手段および前記情報収集手段を手
続き化し、この手続きをデータベースに登録する手続き
登録手段とを有するプログラム障害解析方式。
1. A failure analysis means for analyzing a failure, an information collection means for collecting information, a description for instructing information collection / failure analysis from failure log information, and an environment for reproducing a program in which a failure has occurred. A simple language that can be started up below and can be used to instruct to perform timely necessary information collection / fault analysis is defined, and the fault analysis means and the information collection means are proceduralized, and this procedure is stored in a database. A program failure analysis method having a procedure registration means for registering to a.
JP4052124A 1992-03-11 1992-03-11 Program fault analyzing system Withdrawn JPH05257723A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4052124A JPH05257723A (en) 1992-03-11 1992-03-11 Program fault analyzing system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4052124A JPH05257723A (en) 1992-03-11 1992-03-11 Program fault analyzing system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH05257723A true JPH05257723A (en) 1993-10-08

Family

ID=12906132

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4052124A Withdrawn JPH05257723A (en) 1992-03-11 1992-03-11 Program fault analyzing system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH05257723A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009020863A (en) * 2008-04-10 2009-01-29 Ricoh Co Ltd Image forming apparatus, information processor, fault analysis support method, and fault analysis support program
US9003394B2 (en) 2007-07-10 2015-04-07 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Program determining apparatus and program determining method

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9003394B2 (en) 2007-07-10 2015-04-07 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Program determining apparatus and program determining method
US9792159B2 (en) 2007-07-10 2017-10-17 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Program determining apparatus and program determining method
JP2009020863A (en) * 2008-04-10 2009-01-29 Ricoh Co Ltd Image forming apparatus, information processor, fault analysis support method, and fault analysis support program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6889114B2 (en) Automatic programming and simulation apparatus
US6751523B2 (en) NC machining simulation apparatus
JPH05257723A (en) Program fault analyzing system
CN111078193A (en) Software development method and system for data analysis system
JPS59114650A (en) Program tracing system
JP2787927B2 (en) Automatic SFC language generation apparatus and method
JPH0831012B2 (en) Data verification test method
JPH07114459A (en) System for extracting and displaying undefinition data
JPH0784620A (en) Conversion processing method for tool route information
JPS63213038A (en) Automatic generating system for test program
JPH07129437A (en) Message logging information output system
JPH11154106A (en) Test system for data extraction program
JPH06250876A (en) Interactive debugging supporting system
JPH05233349A (en) Automatic test tool for program module
JPH02151931A (en) Reutilization system for intermediate language text
JP2001027946A (en) Method for outputting screen information of interactive program system
JPH04242427A (en) Program designing system
JPH04247532A (en) Test supporting system
JPH04160651A (en) General purpose file utility
JPH05158741A (en) Test verification method for computer program
JPS60178535A (en) Execution definition type command system for processing
JPH05241912A (en) Program processing confirming system
JPS63640A (en) Execution control system for partial unit of data flow
JPH05216828A (en) Error processing system in batch execution of software simulator
JPH01199240A (en) Dynamic test device for program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 19990518