JPH05249881A - Operation training simulator - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To statistically evaluate totalization data by displaying the evaluation of an operation procedure in a real time during simulator training and leaving the evaluation result as a file. CONSTITUTION:A control board 1 is connected to a computer 4 for simulator through an input/output computer 3. A CRT 12 and a request panel 13 are connected to the computer 4 through a CRT driving processor 11. An instructor 14 selects an object mode to be evaluated through the request panel 13. Operation information on an operator 2 is transferred from the control board 1 to the computer 4 and stored in a memory part 7. Plant state parameters are computed by software 5 and stored in the memory part 7. Software 6 for operation procedure evaluation reads the plant state parameters and operator's operation information out of the memory part 7 and performs arithmetic processing to evaluate the operation procedure. This evaluation result is displayed on a CRT 12 in a real time and recognized by the instructor 14, and also stored on a disk device 8.

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an operation training simulator having an operation procedure evaluation function capable of automatically evaluating an operation performed by an operator during a plant operation training by the simulator.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, using a driving training simulator,
When conducting operator plant operation training, instructors and the like monitor and check the validity of the operation performed by the operator, and based on the operation record, a manual analysis is performed after the training.

[0003]

Conventionally, when the operator is used to perform plant operation training using the simulator as described above, the operation procedure evaluation device is not incorporated as an educational support tool, and the operator does not. The instructor conducts a monitoring check to evaluate the appropriateness of the operation. However, there has been a problem that the quantitative evaluation of the propriety of the operation performed by the operator is often influenced by the quality and individuality of the person who monitors and checks.

According to the present invention, a reference in each plant operation mode is quantitatively incorporated in advance, an operation procedure evaluation can be displayed on a display system in real time during simulator training, and each evaluation result can be left as a file. The purpose is to provide a training simulator.

[0005]

A driving training simulator according to the present invention is provided in a driving training computer, a control panel connected to the computer, a display system connected to the computer, and the computer. , A plant model processing means for calculating plant state parameters by calculation, a memory for storing plant state parameters processed by this means and operator operation information input from the control panel, and plant state parameters stored in this memory, The operation procedure evaluation means for reading out the operator operation information and evaluating the operation procedure, and the result evaluated by this means are displayed on the display system in real time.
It has a driving procedure evaluation function characterized by having a means for storing in an external memory.

[0006]

First, the instructor selects the mode in which the operation evaluation is performed and operates the simulator computer. Along with the operation of this computer, plant state parameters and operator operation information input from the control panel are stored in the memory. While the simulator is running, the plant status parameter operation information is read from the above memory and evaluated.
The evaluation result is output and displayed on the CRT display system in real time. The evaluation information is stored as a file in an external memory, which is a computer peripheral device for simulation. By storing the evaluation information in this external memory, it is possible to access the external memory and then create statistical data by operating the terminal.

[0007]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an operator training simulator having a driving procedure evaluation function. In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 is a control panel operated by an operator 2, and an input / output computer 3
Is connected to the computer 4 for driving training simulator via. This simulator computer 4 is a plant model
It is provided with application software 5, operating procedure evaluation application software 6, a memory unit 7, and other arithmetic processing units. The simulator computer 4 is connected to a disk device 8 as an external memory, a line printer 9, and a terminal device 10, and a CRT.
The CRT 12 and the request panel 13 are connected via the drive processor 11. This request panel 13
Are operated by the instructor 14.

In the above configuration, the instructor 14
Is operated from the request panel 11 such as starting / stopping the plant, and selects the target mode for evaluation.
The mode set here is sent to the simulator computer 4 via the CRT drive processor 11 and recognized by the driving procedure evaluation application software 6.

In the simulator system, the operation information of the operator 2 is transferred to the control panel 1 → the input / output computer 3 → the simulator computer 4 and stored in the memory unit 7. or,
The plant state parameter is calculated by the plant model application software 5 and stored in the memory unit 7.

The operating procedure evaluation application software 6 reads out the plant state parameters and the operator operation information from the memory unit 7 and performs arithmetic processing to evaluate the operating procedure. The evaluation result and the plant state parameter are sent to the CRT drive processor 11 via the memory unit 7 and displayed on the CRT 12. The evaluation result displayed on the CRT 12 is immediately recognized by the instructor 14.

The evaluation result of the operating procedure evaluation application software 6 is stored in the memory unit 7,
The instructor 14 can output necessary information to the line printer 9 by operating the request panel 13.

Further, the evaluation result by the operating procedure check evaluation application software 6 stored in the memory unit 7 is
It is automatically transferred to the disk device 8 and stored in the database file. Therefore, thereafter, the file stored in the disk device 8 can be accessed by operating the terminal device 10 to create statistical data. CRT above
The following two modes of screens can be displayed on 12 through the request panel 11. 1. Detailed procedure check screen (Fig. 2) 2. Overall Time Series Screen (FIG. 3) First, “1. Detailed procedure check screen” will be described with reference to FIG. (1). The screen display items are item No. 15, a check item 16, a standard state 17, an operation state 18, a unit 19, and a determination 20.

(2). Trigger item 21 per page
Then, there is a trigger check item 22, and the state of the check item is displayed in the operation state column 18 in real time. (3). The standard state 17 is described in a fixed image, and becomes a reference value of the trigger check item 22 when it is input to the trigger item 21.

(4). The operator 2 performs some operation and a signal is input to the trigger item 21 (trigger stands)
And, the trigger check item 22 is the standard state 17 value,
The values of the operating state 18, which is the current state, are compared. At this time, the marking 23 turns yellow. (5). Only the display function of the operation state 18 is described in the standard state 17 column. (6). When a signal is input to the trigger item 21, the page is automatically displayed. (7). As a result of comparison in (4) above, when the standard state 17 and the operating state 18 do not match, the line turns red. (8). If the number of trigger check items 22 is M and the number of mismatches is N, the determination column is displayed as N / M. (9). After the check is completed, the value of the operation state 18 is fixed. Next, "2. Overall time series screen" will be described with reference to FIG. (1). The screen display items are No. 24, time 25, various systems (primary system 26, secondary system 27), procedure 28, and error item number 29. (2). In the detailed procedure check screen (FIG. 2), the trigger item 21 with a trigger signal is displayed in time series. (3). For the number of incorrect items 29, the detailed check screen determination 20
The value displayed in the column is displayed. (4). The page number for each mode (primary system 26, secondary system 27). Is also displayed. The data transferred to the disk device 8 is stored as a file, and these are made into a totalized file as follows. The summary file consists of: (A). Detailed procedure check file for only incorrect items for one day (Fig. 4) (b). Large-item error count summary file for one month by day (Fig. 5) (c). One-year monthly major item error count total files (FIG. 6) The instructor 14 can rewrite these total files by operating the terminal 10. Further, these files can be taken out by the line printer 9. (A). Detailed procedure check file for only incorrect items for one day (Fig. 4) (1). The image display item includes a page 30, an item 31, and an error count 32. (2). Page 30 is the item No. of the detailed procedure check screen shown in FIG. Equivalent to 15. (3). As the item 31, items corresponding to pages are displayed. (4). The error count 32 is the detailed procedure check screen (Fig. 2)
When the standard state 17 and the operation state 18 of No. 1 do not match, it is the cumulative number of times of the day and the day. (B). Large item error count summary file by day for one month (Fig. 5) (1). Image display items are trigger item 33, date 3
4, error count 35, TOTAL 36. (2). The trigger item 33 is the item number of the detailed procedure check screen. Corresponds to 15. (3). The error count 35 for one month is output for each item.

(4). The error count is defined by adding "1" when the number of trigger items 22 on the detailed procedure check screen (FIG. 2) is M and the mismatch is N, and N> 0.
It is the cumulative value of months. (5). The TOTAL value 36 of the incorrect number of times per month is output. (C). Large-item error count summary file for one year by month (Fig. 6) (1). Image display items are trigger item 37, month 38,
It consists of the error count 39 and TOTAL 40. (2). The trigger item 37 is item No. of the detailed procedure check screen (FIG. 2). Corresponds to 15. (3). For each item, the number of errors per month 39 for one year is output.

(4). The definition of the number of errors is 1 when 1 is added when N> 0 when the number of trigger items 22 is M and the number of mismatches is N on the detailed procedure check screen (FIG. 2).
It is an integrated value for the year. (5) TOTAL 40 with the wrong number of times per year is output.

[0018]

As described above in detail, according to the present invention, the evaluation of the driving procedure by the operator is displayed on the display system in real time during the simulator training, and the evaluation of the operation currently being performed is instantly performed. It can be recognized by the instructor. Further, since each evaluation is stored as a file in the external memory, it is possible to statistically evaluate it by collecting the statistics.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an overall configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a detailed check screen according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of an entire time series screen according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of a detailed procedure check file for only one day of erroneous items according to the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a daily large-item error count total file for one month according to the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a yearly large item error count total file for one year according to the present invention.

[Explanation of symbols]

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Control panel, 2 ... Operator, 3 ... Input / output computer, 4 ... Simulator computer, 5 ... Plant model application software, 6 ... Operating procedure evaluation application software, 7 ... Memory part, 8 ... Disk device , 9 ... Line printer, 10 ... Terminal, 11 ... CRT
Drive processor, 12 ... CRT, 13 ... Request panel, 14 ... Instructor.

Claims (1)

[Claims] 1. A computer for a driving training simulator, a control panel connected to the computer, a display system connected to the computer, and plant model processing means provided in the computer for calculating plant state parameters by calculation. , A memory for storing plant state parameters processed by this means and operator operation information input from the control panel, and a plant state parameter and operator operation information stored in this memory are read out to evaluate an operating procedure. While displaying the operating procedure evaluation means and the results evaluated by this means in real time on the display system,
A driving training simulator having a driving procedure evaluation function, which is provided with means for storing it in an external memory.