JPH0515064A - Load-limiting device of power system - Google Patents

Load-limiting device of power system

Info

Publication number
JPH0515064A
JPH0515064A JP3188355A JP18835591A JPH0515064A JP H0515064 A JPH0515064 A JP H0515064A JP 3188355 A JP3188355 A JP 3188355A JP 18835591 A JP18835591 A JP 18835591A JP H0515064 A JPH0515064 A JP H0515064A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
power
load
amount
power system
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP3188355A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3109608B2 (en
Inventor
Hideaki Kaneda
秀明 金田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP03188355A priority Critical patent/JP3109608B2/en
Publication of JPH0515064A publication Critical patent/JPH0515064A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3109608B2 publication Critical patent/JP3109608B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To enable load to be limited highly accurately and stably without any insufficient control of load control at the time of omission of a power supply. CONSTITUTION:System stabilization devices 4a and 4b are allowed to obtain a ratio of amount of omission of power supply of each of power systems A and B for an amount of omission of power supply of the entire power systems A and B, a needed amount of load limitation as entire power systems A and B is distributed by a ratio for each power system, and then load is limited asynchronously based on an amount of distribution.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】この発明は、電力系統において、
原子力発電機の緊急停止等の電源脱落発生による周波数
の低下を防止する場合などに利用する電力系統の負荷制
限装置に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a power system,
The present invention relates to a load limiting device for a power system used when preventing a frequency drop due to power failure such as an emergency stop of a nuclear power generator.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】図3は従来の電力系統の負荷制限装置を
示すブロック図であり、図において、A,Bは電力系
統、Cは電力系統A,Bを結ぶ幹線、1a,2aは電力
系統Aに電力を供給する発電機、1b,2bは電力系統
Bに電力を供給する発電機、3a,3bはそれぞれ電力
系統A,Bを結ぶ送電線の系統事故(ルート断)を検出
し、系統安定化装置4a,4bに事故検出信号を送出す
る端末装置、5a,5bは各送電線の潮流情報を送信す
る第1の情報伝送装置である。なお、各系統安定化装置
4a,4bは発電機1a,2a,1b,2bより必要負
荷制限量を演算し、その量に応じて負荷制限指令を出力
する。
2. Description of the Related Art FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a conventional load limiting device for a power system. In the figure, A and B are power systems, C is a main line connecting power systems A and B, and 1a and 2a are power systems. A generator supplying electric power to A, 1b and 2b generators supplying electric power to the electric power system B, and 3a and 3b detect a system fault (route disconnection) of a transmission line connecting the electric power systems A and B, respectively, and The terminal devices 5a and 5b that send an accident detection signal to the stabilization devices 4a and 4b are first information transmission devices that transmit the power flow information of each power transmission line. Each system stabilizing device 4a, 4b calculates a required load limiting amount from the generators 1a, 2a, 1b, 2b, and outputs a load limiting command according to the amount.

【0003】また、6a,6bは必要負荷制限量に応じ
た負荷量を選択するために必要な負荷線潮流情報を送信
する第2の情報伝送装置、7a,7bは系統安定化装置
4a,4bより電力系統A,Bへ負荷制限指令を送出す
るための転送遮断装置である。また、図4は例えば系統
安定化装置4aによる負荷制御の手順を示すフローチャ
ートである。
Further, 6a and 6b are second information transmission devices for transmitting load line power flow information necessary for selecting a load amount according to a required load limit amount, and 7a and 7b are system stabilizing devices 4a and 4b. This is a transfer cutoff device for sending a load limiting command to the electric power systems A and B. Further, FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a procedure of load control by the system stabilizing device 4a, for example.

【0004】次に、図4のフローチャートを参照しなが
ら、動作について説明する。一般に、電力系統におい
て、電源が脱落したことによる周波数の低下がある値以
下になると、需要家への電気機器等の故障を招き、電力
需要と供給のバランス(以下、需給バランスという)が
保てなくなる。このため、保護装置を作動して大停電に
至らしめることになる。そこで、系統における一部の負
荷(需要家)を高速に遮断する(これを負荷制限とい
う)ことによって、周波数の低下を防止することにな
る。このとき、最適となる必要負荷制限量は、Paを電
源脱落量[MW]、Paを許容電源脱落量[MW]、K
Δfを系統特性定数とすると、数1のようになる。
Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. In general, in a power system, if the frequency drops due to the power supply being dropped to a value below a certain level, it will lead to the breakdown of electric equipment to customers, and the balance between power demand and supply (hereinafter referred to as the supply and demand balance) can be maintained. Disappear. Therefore, the protection device is activated to cause a large power failure. Therefore, a part of the load (consumer) in the system is cut off at high speed (this is called load limitation) to prevent the frequency from decreasing. At this time, the optimum required load limiting amount is Pa for the power loss amount [MW], Pa for the allowable power loss amount [MW], K
When Δf is a system characteristic constant, it becomes as shown in Equation 1.

【0005】[0005]

【数1】 [Equation 1]

【0006】この数1では、許容電源脱落量Paは、負
荷制限を実施しなくても、系統の予備力で維持しうる電
源脱落量を示す。従って、Pg〈Paのとき、必要負荷
制御量Plfはマイナスとなり、負荷制限は不要となる
ことがわかる。また、系統特性定数KΔfは系統固有の
値で、許容電源脱落量Paは系統容量等のオンライン情
報,系統特性数から算出し、系統特性定数KΔfは計算
機を用いて、系統のシミュレーションを行うことで求め
られる。
In this equation 1, the allowable power drop amount Pa indicates the power drop amount that can be maintained by the reserve power of the system without performing load limitation. Therefore, when Pg <Pa, the required load control amount Plf becomes negative, and it is understood that the load limitation is unnecessary. Further, the system characteristic constant KΔf is a value peculiar to the system, the allowable power loss amount Pa is calculated from online information such as the system capacity and the number of system characteristics, and the system characteristic constant KΔf is obtained by performing a system simulation using a computer. Desired.

【0007】次に、系統安定化装置4aによる負荷制限
の動作を図4のフローチャートに従って説明する。ま
ず、第1の情報伝送装置5aより一定周期毎に送られて
くる潮流情報を取込み(ステップST1)、この潮流値
をもとに、現在、この電源が脱落した場合、どれだけの
負荷制限を行えば良いかを、数1に基づき、必要負荷制
限量Plfaの算出により決定し(ステップST2)、
こうして算出した必要負荷制限量Plfaに対し、これ
を上まわる最小の組合せとなる負荷を選択する(ステッ
プST3)。ここで、負荷(需要家)は、系統安定化装
置4aが対象とする電源脱落ケース(以下、事故ケース
という)に対し安定化しうる十分な負荷を複数備えてい
る。そして、これらの負荷に設置された第2の情報伝送
装置6aより送られる負荷線潮流情報に基づき、遮断パ
ターンを選択する。
Next, the load limiting operation by the system stabilizing device 4a will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. First, the power flow information sent from the first information transmission device 5a at regular intervals is fetched (step ST1), and based on this power flow value, if the power supply is currently dropped, how much load is limited? Whether or not to carry out is determined by calculating the required load limit amount Plfa based on the equation 1 (step ST2),
With respect to the required load limit amount Plfa calculated in this manner, the minimum combination of loads that exceeds it is selected (step ST3). Here, the load (consumer) is provided with a plurality of sufficient loads that can be stabilized with respect to the power loss case (hereinafter referred to as an accident case) targeted by the system stabilizing device 4a. Then, the cutoff pattern is selected based on the load line power flow information sent from the second information transmission device 6a installed in these loads.

【0008】この遮断パターンの選択例は、次の通りで
ある。いま、必要負荷制限量Plfaを300MW、負
荷P,Q,Rの大きさをそれぞれ100MW,150M
W,200MWとすると、(イ)P+Q=250MW
〈Plfa、(ロ)Q+R=350MW〉Plfa、
(ハ)P+R=300MW〈Plfa、(ニ)P+Q+
R=450MW〉Plfaとなるので、選択される遮断
パターンは(ロ)の負荷Qと負荷Rとなる。
An example of selecting this blocking pattern is as follows. Now, the required load limit amount Plfa is 300 MW, and the loads P, Q, and R are 100 MW and 150 M, respectively.
Assuming W and 200 MW, (a) P + Q = 250 MW
<Plfa, (b) Q + R = 350 MW> Plfa,
(C) P + R = 300 MW <Plfa, (D) P + Q +
Since R = 450 MW> Plfa, the cutoff patterns to be selected are the load Q and the load R of (b).

【0009】次に、実際に事故が発生したかどうかを判
定する(ステップST4)。すなわち、端末装置3aよ
り送られる事故検出信号を入力し、もし事故が発生すれ
ば、ステップST3で選択した上記遮断パターンに基づ
き、負荷遮断信号を転送遮断装置7aに出力する(ステ
ップST5)。
Next, it is determined whether or not an accident has actually occurred (step ST4). That is, the accident detection signal sent from the terminal device 3a is input, and if an accident occurs, a load cutoff signal is output to the transfer cutoff device 7a based on the cutoff pattern selected in step ST3 (step ST5).

【0010】なお、系統安定化装置4bについても、系
統安定化装置4aについて説明した処理と同様で、系統
安定化装置4aとは異なる事故ケースおよび負荷を対象
とする。また、両系統安定化装置4a,4bは全く独立
に動作する。さらに、系統安定化装置4bでの必要負荷
制限量は、Pgb1 を発電機1bの出力値[MW]、P
gb2 を発電機2bの出力値[MW]とすると、数2の
通りとなる。
The system stabilizing device 4b is also similar to the process described for the system stabilizing device 4a, and is intended for accident cases and loads different from those of the system stabilizing device 4a. Further, both system stabilizing devices 4a and 4b operate completely independently. Further, the required load limiting amount in the system stabilizing device 4b is determined by setting Pgb 1 to the output value [MW] of the generator 1b, P
When gb 2 is the output value [MW] of the generator 2b, the following equation 2 is obtained.

【0011】[0011]

【数2】 [Equation 2]

【0012】[0012]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】従来の電力系統の負荷
制限装置は以上のように構成されているので、電力系統
A,Bにおいて同時に電源が脱落(多重事故)した場合
や、短期間に連続して脱落(続発事故)した場合、数1
における許容電源脱落量Pa,および系統特性定数KΔ
fは、電力系統A,Bとも同一の値であり、一例として
Pga1 +Pga2 〈Pa,Pgb1 +Pgb2 〈P
a,Pga1 +Pga2 +Pgb1 +Pgb2 〉Paと
なる条件を考えた場合、系統全体では、Plf〉0で負
荷制限を行う必要があるにも拘らず、系統安定化装置4
a,4bがPlfa〈0,Plfb〈0で負荷制限は必
要ないと判定するため不足制御となり、系統の安定化を
図ることができないなどの課題があった。
Since the conventional load limiting device for the electric power system is constructed as described above, it is possible that the electric power sources of the electric power systems A and B are simultaneously disconnected (multiple accidents) or in a short period of time. And then dropped out (secondary accident), the number 1
Permissible power loss amount Pa and system characteristic constant KΔ
f is the same value in the power systems A and B, and as an example, Pga 1 + Pga 2 <Pa, Pgb 1 + Pgb 2 <P
Considering the condition that a, Pga 1 + Pga 2 + Pgb 1 + Pgb 2 > Pa, in the entire system, the system stabilization device 4 is required despite the fact that the load is limited by Plf> 0.
Since a and 4b determine Plfa <0 and Plfb <0 and load limitation is not necessary, insufficient control is performed, and there is a problem that the system cannot be stabilized.

【0013】この発明は上記のような課題を解消するた
めになされたもので、不足制御となることなく、高精度
に負荷制限を実施できると共に、ソフトウェアにて、簡
単かつ安価に実現できる電力系統の負荷制限装置を得る
ことを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems, and it is possible to perform load limitation with high accuracy without insufficient control, and a power system that can be easily and inexpensively realized by software. The purpose is to obtain a load limiting device.

【0014】[0014]

【課題を解決するための手段】この発明に係る電力系統
の負荷制限装置は、系統安定化装置に、電力系統全体の
電源脱落量に対する各電力系統の電源脱落量の比率を求
めさせ、上記電力系統全体としての必要負荷制限量を各
電力系統ごとの上記比率で配分し、該配分量に基づき非
同期で負荷制限を実施させるようにしたものである。
A load limiting device for a power system according to the present invention causes a system stabilizing device to obtain a ratio of a power loss amount of each power system to a power loss amount of the entire power system, and The required load limitation amount for the entire system is distributed at the above ratio for each power system, and the load limitation is performed asynchronously based on the distribution amount.

【0015】[0015]

【作用】この発明における系統安定化装置は、系統全体
の電源脱落量を検出することにより、系統全体で必要と
する負荷制限量を求めるため、各電力系統にまたがる電
源脱落が同時に、あるいは短期間に連続して発生した場
合でも不足制御とならず、精度良く負荷制限を実施す
る。また、系統全体の電源脱落量に対し、各電力系統の
電源脱落量の比率で系統全体として必要とされる負荷制
限量を分配することにより、電力系統ごとに電力需給バ
ランスを保つことができ、各電力系統間を結ぶ幹線の潮
流変動を小さくする。
The system stabilizing device according to the present invention detects the amount of power loss of the entire system to obtain the load limiting amount required for the entire system. Therefore, the power loss across each power system can occur simultaneously or for a short period of time. Even if it occurs continuously, the load control is performed accurately without causing insufficient control. In addition, by distributing the load limitation amount required for the entire system at the ratio of the power loss amount of each power system to the power loss amount of the entire system, it is possible to maintain the power supply and demand balance for each power system, Minimize tidal current fluctuations on the main line connecting each power system.

【0016】[0016]

【実施例】実施例1.以下、この発明の一実施例を図に
ついて説明する。図1において、A,Bは電力系統、C
は電力系統A,Bを結ぶ幹線、1a,2aは電力系統A
に電力を供給する発電機、1b,2bは電力系統Bに電
力を供給する発電機、3a,3bはそれぞれ電力系統
A,Bを結ぶ送電線の系統事故(ルート断)を検出し、
系統安定化装置4a,4bに事故検出信号を送出する端
末装置、5a,5bは各送電線の潮流情報を送信する第
1の情報伝送装置である。なお、各系統安定化装置4
a,4bは発電機1a,2a,1b,2bより必要負荷
制限量を演算し、その量に応じて負荷制限指令を出力す
る。
EXAMPLES Example 1. An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. In FIG. 1, A and B are electric power systems and C
Is a main line connecting power systems A and B, 1a and 2a are power systems A
Generators for supplying electric power to the power generators 1b, 2b for supplying electric power to the electric power system B, and 3a, 3b for detecting a system fault (disconnection of the route) of the transmission line connecting the electric power systems A, B, respectively.
The terminal devices 5a and 5b for transmitting the accident detection signal to the system stabilizing devices 4a and 4b are the first information transmission devices for transmitting the power flow information of each power transmission line. In addition, each system stabilizing device 4
a and 4b calculate required load limiting amounts from the generators 1a, 2a, 1b and 2b, and output load limiting commands according to the calculated amounts.

【0017】また、6a,6bは必要負荷制限量に応じ
た負荷量を選択するために必要な負荷線潮流情報を送信
する第2の情報伝送装置、7a,7bは系統安定化装置
4a,4bより電力系統A,Bへ負荷制限指令を送出す
るための転送遮断装置である。また、この発明では、特
に、事故検出信号を送出する端末装置3a,3bおよび
送電線の潮流情報を送信する第1の情報伝送装置5a,
5bの各信号および情報を、情報伝達手段Y1〜Y4を
介して他系統の系統安定化装置4a,4bへも伝送して
いる。また、図2は電力系統A側における負荷制御の手
順を示すフローチャートである。
Further, 6a and 6b are second information transmission devices for transmitting load line power flow information necessary for selecting a load amount according to the required load limit amount, and 7a and 7b are system stabilizing devices 4a and 4b. This is a transfer cutoff device for sending a load limiting command to the electric power systems A and B. Further, in the present invention, in particular, the terminal devices 3a and 3b for transmitting the accident detection signal and the first information transmission device 5a for transmitting the power flow information of the power transmission line,
The signals and information of 5b are also transmitted to the system stabilizing devices 4a and 4b of other systems via the information transmitting means Y1 to Y4. Further, FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a procedure of load control on the side of the power system A.

【0018】次に、図2に示すフローチャートを用いて
動作を説明する。なお、説明をわかり易くするために、
発電機1a,2aが電源脱落してt秒後(t=T:演算
同期)、発電機1b,2bが電源脱落した場合の系統安
定化装置4aの動作について説明する。まず、系統安定
化装置4aは第1の情報伝送装置5a,5bより一定周
期毎に送られてくる送電線の潮流情報を取込み(ステッ
プST11)、続いて、事故が発生したかどうかを検出
する信号としての端末装置3a,3bより送られる事故
検出信号を取込む(ステップST12)。ここで、系統
安定化装置4a,4bが対象とする事故ケースは、発電
機1a,2aの電源脱落、発電機1b,2bの電源脱落
および発電機1a,2a,1b,2bの電源脱落の3ケ
ースとなるが、ここでは、系統安定化装置4aは上記各
信号を取込んで、発電機1a,2aが電源脱落したと認
識する。
Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flow chart shown in FIG. In order to make the explanation easier to understand,
The operation of the system stabilizing device 4a in the case where the generators 1a and 2a are powered off t seconds later (t = T: operation synchronization) and the generators 1b and 2b are powered off will be described. First, the system stabilizing device 4a takes in power flow information of the power transmission line sent from the first information transmitting devices 5a and 5b at regular intervals (step ST11), and subsequently detects whether or not an accident has occurred. The accident detection signal sent from the terminal devices 3a and 3b is taken in as a signal (step ST12). Here, the accident cases targeted by the power system stabilizers 4a and 4b are the power loss of the generators 1a and 2a, the power loss of the generators 1b and 2b, and the power loss of the generators 1a, 2a, 1b and 2b. In this case, the system stabilizing device 4a takes in the above signals and recognizes that the generators 1a and 2a have lost power.

【0019】次に、検出した事故ケース並びに送電線の
潮流情報に基づき、数3および数4に従って必要負荷制
限量を算出する(ステップST13)。ここで、ΣPg
は系統全体での電源脱落量トータル[MW]、ΣPga
は電力系統aにおける電源脱落量トータル[MW]、Σ
Pgbは電力系統bにおける電源脱落量トータル[M
W]、n=1,2,3・・・(整数)、Sは今までに遮
断した負荷制限量トータルとする。
Next, based on the detected accident case and the power flow information of the transmission line, the required load limiting amount is calculated according to the equations 3 and 4 (step ST13). Where ΣPg
Is the total amount of power loss in the entire system [MW], ΣPga
Is the total amount of power loss in the power system a [MW], Σ
Pgb is the total amount of power loss in the power system b [M
W], n = 1, 2, 3 ... (integer), S is the total load limit amount interrupted so far.

【0020】[0020]

【数3】 [Equation 3]

【0021】[0021]

【数4】 [Equation 4]

【0022】また、数3,数4において、Plfaは、
系統安定化装置4aの、Plfbは系統安定化装置4b
の各必要負荷制限量を示し、ΣPg=Pga(=Pga
1 +Pga2 ),ΣPga=Pga,ΣPg=Pga,
ΣPgb=0,今まで両装置の遮断したトータルの必要
負荷制限量S=0を代入すると、数5,数6のようにな
る。
In equations 3 and 4, Plfa is
Plfb of the system stabilizing device 4a is a system stabilizing device 4b
Of each required load limit of ΣPg = Pga (= Pga
1 + Pga 2 ), ΣPga = Pga, ΣPg = Pga,
Substituting ΣPgb = 0 and the total required load limit amount S = 0 interrupted by both devices up to now, the following equations 5 and 6 are obtained.

【0023】[0023]

【数5】 [Equation 5]

【0024】[0024]

【数6】 [Equation 6]

【0025】ここで、Pga≦Paの場合には、必要負
荷制限量Plfaはマイナス値となり、負荷制限は実施
しない(ステップST14)。一方、Pga>Paの場
合には、必要負荷制限量Plfaに基づき、これを上ま
わる最小の組合せとなる負荷を遮断選択し、選択した負
荷に対し負荷遮断信号を転送遮断装置7aに出力する
(ステップST15)。さらに、発電機1a,2aの電
源脱落後、t秒にて発電機1b,2bが電源脱落した場
合、次演算周期のステップST12で事故ケースを認識
した後、ステップST13で必要負荷制限量を算出す
る。
Here, when Pga ≦ Pa, the required load limit amount Plfa becomes a negative value, and the load limit is not executed (step ST14). On the other hand, in the case of Pga> Pa, based on the required load limit amount Plfa, the load that is the smallest combination exceeding this is selected to be cut off, and a load cutoff signal is output to the transfer cutoff device 7a for the selected load ( Step ST15). Further, when the power sources of the generators 1a and 2a are dropped at t seconds after the power sources of the generators 1a and 2a are dropped, after the accident case is recognized in step ST12 of the next calculation cycle, the necessary load limit amount is calculated in step ST13. To do.

【0026】すなわち、ΣPg=Pgab+Pgb(P
gb=Pgb1 +Pgb2 ),ΣPga=Pga,ΣP
gb=Pgb,および数5の今まで系統安定化装置4
a,4bが遮断したトータル必要負荷制限量を、数3,
数4に代入すると、それぞれ数7,数8のようになる。
なお、系統安定化装置4bについては、Plfbの算出
式に基づく必要負荷制限量となる。
That is, ΣPg = Pgab + Pgb (P
gb = Pgb 1 + Pgb 2 ), ΣPga = Pga, ΣP
gb = Pgb, and up to now the system stabilizer 4 of the number 5
The total required load limiting amount blocked by a and 4b is given by
Substituting into Equation 4 gives Equations 7 and 8, respectively.
For the system stabilizing device 4b, the required load limit amount is based on the Plfb calculation formula.

【0027】[0027]

【数7】 [Equation 7]

【0028】[0028]

【数8】 [Equation 8]

【0029】ここで、系統全体として行われたトータル
負荷制限量Plftは、数9のようになる。
Here, the total load limiting amount Plft performed for the entire system is as shown in equation 9.

【0030】[0030]

【数9】 [Equation 9]

【0031】このトータル負荷制限量は、発電機1a,
2a,1b,2bが同時に電源脱落した場合の必要負荷
制限量に等しい。すなわち、系統全体の電源脱落量で求
めた必要負荷制限量に対し、各ブロック系統(各電力系
統)の電源脱落量の比率で負荷制限量を比例配分するこ
とにより、複数のブロック系統において、電源脱落がラ
ンダムに発生した場合でも、不足制御となることなく、
事故が発生した時点で、各ブロック系統に設置された、
系統安定化装置が非同期に負荷制限を行うことで、系統
を安定化することができることとなる。
This total load limit is determined by the generator 1a,
This is equal to the required load limiting amount when the power supplies of 2a, 1b, and 2b are simultaneously disconnected. That is, by proportionally distributing the load limit amount by the ratio of the power loss amount of each block system (each power system) to the required load limit amount obtained by the power loss amount of the entire system, the power supply is reduced in multiple block systems. Even if the dropouts occur randomly, without insufficient control,
When the accident occurred, it was installed in each block system,
Since the system stabilizer asynchronously limits the load, the system can be stabilized.

【0032】実施例2.なお、上記実施例では系統全体
の必要負荷制限量を各ブロックの電源脱落量の比率で配
分する様にしたが、この配分する比率xを設定する様に
しても良い。このときの必要負荷量の算出式は、数1
0,数11の通りとなる。
Example 2. In the above embodiment, the required load limit amount of the entire system is distributed by the ratio of the power supply dropout amount of each block, but this distribution ratio x may be set. At this time, the formula for calculating the required load is
0, as shown in Equation 11.

【0033】[0033]

【数10】 [Equation 10]

【0034】[0034]

【数11】 [Equation 11]

【0035】[0035]

【発明の効果】以上のように、この発明によれば電力系
統全体の電源脱落量に対する各電力系統の電源脱落量の
比率を求め、上記電力系統全体としての必要負荷制限量
を各電力系統ごとの上記比率で配分し、該配分量に基づ
き非同期で負荷制限を実施させる機能を、系統安定化装
置に持たせるように構成したので、複数の電力系統にま
たがる電源脱落が発生した場合でも、不足制御となるこ
となく、精度良く負荷制限を実施できるとともに、各電
力系統を安定させることができ、かつ負荷制限による各
電力系統間の潮流変動を小さくすることができ、しか
も、この負荷制限動作をスイッチを使うことによって簡
単かつ安価に実現できるものが得られる効果がある。
As described above, according to the present invention, the ratio of the power loss amount of each power system to the power loss amount of the entire power system is obtained, and the necessary load limit amount of the power system is calculated for each power system. Since the system stabilizer is configured to have a function of performing the load distribution asynchronously based on the above-mentioned distribution ratio even if a power loss occurs across multiple power systems, it is insufficient. The load can be accurately controlled without control, each power system can be stabilized, and the power flow fluctuation between each power system due to the load restriction can be reduced. By using the switch, there is an effect that the one that can be realized easily and at low cost is obtained.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】この発明の一実施例による電力系統の負荷制限
装置を示すシステム構成図である。
FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram showing a load limiting device for a power system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】この発明による負荷制限動作を示すフローチャ
ート図である。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a load limiting operation according to the present invention.

【図3】従来の電力系統の負荷制限装置を示すシステム
構成図である。
FIG. 3 is a system configuration diagram showing a conventional load limiting device for a power system.

【図4】従来の負荷制限動作を示すフローチャート図で
ある。
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a conventional load limiting operation.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

A,B 電力系統 1a,1b,2a,2b 発電機 3a,3b 端末装置 4a,4b 系統安定化装置 5a,5b 第1の情報伝送装置 6a,6b 第2の情報伝送装置 7a,7b 転送遮断装置 Y1,Y2,Y3,Y4 情報伝達手段 A, B Power system 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b Generator 3a, 3b Terminal device 4a, 4b System stabilizing device 5a, 5b First information transmission device 6a, 6b Second information transmission device 7a, 7b Transfer blocking device Y1, Y2, Y3, Y4 information transmission means

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 【請求項1】 送電線によって結ばれた複数の電力系統
ごとに、それぞれ独立して電力を供給する複数の発電機
と、上記送電線の系統事故を検出して、事故検出信号を
出力する端末装置と、上記電力系統ごとに送電線の潮流
情報を検出して送信する第1の情報伝送装置と、該第1
の情報伝送装置からの潮流情報にもとづいて演算した必
要負荷制限量に応じて、負荷制限指令を出力する系統安
定化装置と、上記必要負荷制限量に応じた負荷量を選択
するために必要な負荷線の潮流情報を送信する第2の情
報伝送装置と、上記各系統安定化装置から各電力系統へ
上記負荷制限指令を送出する転送遮断装置とを備えた電
力系統の負荷制限装置において、上記各系統安定化装置
に対し互いに他の電力系統側の上記端末装置および第1
の情報伝送装置の出力を入力させ、上記系統安定化装置
において、上記電力系統全体の電源脱落量に対する各電
力系統の電源脱落量の比率を求め、上記電力系統全体と
しての必要負荷制限量を各電力系統ごとの上記比率で配
分し、該配分量に基づき非同期で負荷制限を実施させる
情報伝達手段を設けたことを特徴とする電力系統の負荷
制限装置。
Claim: What is claimed is: 1. A plurality of generators that independently supply electric power to each of a plurality of electric power systems connected by a transmission line, and a system fault of the transmission line is detected to detect an accident. A terminal device that outputs a detection signal, a first information transmission device that detects and transmits power flow information of a transmission line for each of the power systems, and the first information transmission device.
It is necessary to select a system stabilizer that outputs a load limit command according to the required load limit amount calculated based on the power flow information from the information transmission device and a load amount according to the required load limit amount. A load limiting device for a power system, comprising: a second information transmitting device for transmitting power flow information of a load line; and a transfer interrupting device for sending the load limiting command from each of the system stabilizing devices to each of the power systems. The above-mentioned terminal device and the first device on the other power system side with respect to each system stabilizing device
Input the output of the information transmission device, and in the system stabilization device, obtain the ratio of the power loss amount of each power system to the power loss amount of the entire power system, and determine the required load limit amount of the power system as a whole. A load limiting device for a power system, comprising: information transmission means for allocating at the above ratio for each power system and asynchronously performing load restriction based on the distribution amount.
JP03188355A 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Power system load limiting device Expired - Lifetime JP3109608B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP03188355A JP3109608B2 (en) 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Power system load limiting device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP03188355A JP3109608B2 (en) 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Power system load limiting device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0515064A true JPH0515064A (en) 1993-01-22
JP3109608B2 JP3109608B2 (en) 2000-11-20

Family

ID=16222177

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP03188355A Expired - Lifetime JP3109608B2 (en) 1991-07-03 1991-07-03 Power system load limiting device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3109608B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6178302B1 (en) 1997-12-09 2001-01-23 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Developer container seal, developer container, developing apparatus, process cartridge, and image forming apparatus

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5291144A (en) * 1976-01-28 1977-08-01 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Load control apparatus for electric power system
JPS62160038A (en) * 1986-01-06 1987-07-16 中部電力株式会社 System stabilizer

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5291144A (en) * 1976-01-28 1977-08-01 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Load control apparatus for electric power system
JPS62160038A (en) * 1986-01-06 1987-07-16 中部電力株式会社 System stabilizer

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6178302B1 (en) 1997-12-09 2001-01-23 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Developer container seal, developer container, developing apparatus, process cartridge, and image forming apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3109608B2 (en) 2000-11-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5200949A (en) Link changeover control system for local area network of broadcasting arrangement
US20100312414A1 (en) System and method for power management and load shedding
JP2007189840A (en) Power system stabilizing apparatus
JPH0515064A (en) Load-limiting device of power system
EP0597322A2 (en) Consumption management and control device particularly for civil electric systems
JP2005261152A (en) Distribution system monitoring and controlling system and watt-hour meter with system monitoring function
EP3916955B1 (en) Systems and methods for electric systems monitoring and/or failure detection
JP2015060333A (en) Multiplex power supply system, information processing device, and monitoring apparatus
CN114335764A (en) Control method and device, energy storage system and non-volatile computer readable storage medium
JP3556044B2 (en) Current differential relay
KR102680289B1 (en) Supporting Device of Power performing remote control and method supporting the same
KR102397664B1 (en) Method for preventing accidents due to disconnection of power distribution line
JP2000358331A (en) Individual operation detector for synchronous generator
JP2702857B2 (en) Grid stabilization control method
US20180123386A1 (en) Apparatus for controlling power based on uninterruptible power supply system
JP2020137299A (en) Electric power system stabilization system
US6310560B2 (en) Communication device and process
JP4170939B2 (en) Power supply system
CN108988341B (en) Power distribution equipment fault adjusting method and device
JP7225072B2 (en) Grid stabilization system
JP2869320B2 (en) Frequency stabilization method
JPH0767257A (en) Power system stabilization system and frequency stabilization system
JP2004072883A (en) Method of stabilizing singly separated system, and system for stabilizing singly separated system
JP2024077733A (en) Power breaker, power interruption system with the same, protection method for power breaker, and protection program
JPS6212217A (en) Optical communication system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080914

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080914

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090914

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090914

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100914

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110914

Year of fee payment: 11

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term