JPH05135178A - Pattern recognition method - Google Patents

Pattern recognition method

Info

Publication number
JPH05135178A
JPH05135178A JP3300220A JP30022091A JPH05135178A JP H05135178 A JPH05135178 A JP H05135178A JP 3300220 A JP3300220 A JP 3300220A JP 30022091 A JP30022091 A JP 30022091A JP H05135178 A JPH05135178 A JP H05135178A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
image
pattern
similar
degree
weight
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP3300220A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Akihito Sakurai
彰人 櫻井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP3300220A priority Critical patent/JPH05135178A/en
Publication of JPH05135178A publication Critical patent/JPH05135178A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To make a reliable judgement even if a given figure is deformed and included in an image by determining weight regarding the pattern obtained by giving the given pattern deformation to be considered, finding the adaptability image and adding the product of the both, and judging whether or not the result is larger than a given reference value. CONSTITUTION:The adaptability to an image A of the pattern B given in specific data form when the reference point of the pattern B is put on coordinates on the image A is calculated (30). The pattern B or A is deformed and the weight between the pattern B' or A' after the deformation and the source pattern B and A is determined (40). While the weight of the similar pattern B' of the pattern B and the similar pattern B' of the pattern B or the weight of the similar image A' of the image A and the similar image A' of the image A is found, the adaptability between the similar pattern B' and image A or similar image A' and pattern B is found and the weighted sum of the adaption by the weight is found (60). When the maximum value obtained while the coordinates on the image A are moved exceeds the reference value, the pattern B is in the figure A.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、図形認識方法に係わ
り、特に画像中にあることを期待する図形を認識するの
に好適な図形認識方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a figure recognition method, and more particularly to a figure recognition method suitable for recognizing a figure expected to be present in an image.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来の図形認識方法に於ては、画像から
その画像中にあることを期待する図形を認識するには (1)当該図形をテンプレートと考え、当該画像中を移
動させながら、また大きさに種類がある時は大きさを変
更しながら、また変形されている可能性のある時には考
え得る変形を行いながら、当該図形と当該画像との一致
の度合を調べ、一致の度合が予め定めた規準以上であれ
ば、そこに当該図形が有ったとする方法 (2)予め図形の特徴量とその計算方法を定めておき、
当該画像及び期待する図形の特徴量を計算し、その特徴
量同士を比較し、当該図形があるか否かを判断する方法 (3)上記(1)、(2)を両者を併せて行う方法 が行われている。
2. Description of the Related Art In a conventional figure recognition method, in order to recognize a figure expected to be present in the image from an image, (1) the figure is considered as a template, and while moving in the image, When the size is different, the size is changed, and when there is a possibility that the shape is deformed, the shape is considered and the degree of coincidence is checked. If the figure is equal to or more than a predetermined criterion, it is assumed that the figure is present.
A method of calculating the feature amount of the image and the expected figure, comparing the feature amounts with each other, and determining whether or not the figure exists (3) A method of performing both (1) and (2) above Is being done.

【0003】いずれにも共通しているところは一致の度
合を判断する為の基準による計算値(適合度)を持ち、
その値が最適となるような図形があれば期待する図形が
あると判断し、その値がない場合又は小さいときは期待
する図形がないと判断する。また当該画像にノイズが重
畳していたり、歪みが含まれている場合に対処する方法
として、当該画像又は当該期待する図形の一方又は双方
にガウシアンオペレータ等の平滑化オペレータを施し、
その後(1)又は(2)又は(3)の方法をとる方法が
ある。
What is common to both has a calculated value (degree of conformity) based on a criterion for judging the degree of coincidence,
If there is a figure having the optimum value, it is determined that there is an expected figure, and if there is no or a small value, it is determined that there is no expected figure. Further, as a method for dealing with the case where noise is superimposed on the image or when distortion is included, a smoothing operator such as a Gaussian operator is applied to one or both of the image and the expected figure,
After that, there is a method of taking the method of (1) or (2) or (3).

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】従来技術では期待する
図形だけを用いて判断のための計算をするため、本来そ
の図形と類似のものが画像中にあるにも係わらず、変形
を受けてしまっている場合、適合度が所定の値に達せ
ず、これを見逃してしまうという問題点があった。一方
平滑化オペレータを用いる方法では特徴量の鋭敏性が失
われ、一致度合が低くなり、同時に、同程度の一致度合
を持つ図形の個数が増加するといった問題点があった。
In the prior art, since the calculation for judgment is made using only the expected figure, the figure is deformed even though the figure is similar to the original figure. In this case, there is a problem that the degree of conformance does not reach a predetermined value and it is overlooked. On the other hand, the method using the smoothing operator has a problem that the sharpness of the feature amount is lost, the degree of coincidence becomes low, and at the same time, the number of figures having the same degree of coincidence increases.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記目的は、期待する図
形の可能な変形も含めて、適合度を計算することによ
り、達成される。すなわち、ある画像に於てある図形の
ある位置における期待する図形との適合度を計算する場
合、判定対象とする図形の位置をその近傍において様々
にずらすことを試み、また、期待する図形に対し可能な
変形を様々に行なって比較を行い、図形の位置をずらす
度合および(または)図形の変形の度合の程度が大きく
なれば小さくなり、図形の位置をずらす度合および(ま
たは)図形の変形の度合の程度が小さくなれば大きくな
るような重み関数で、従来方法と同様に適合度合を計算
し、該当する重みによるそれらの重みつき平均値によっ
て、画像中に期待する図形が有るか無いかの判断をする
のである。ここで、期待する図形の変形は画像Aの判定
対象となる図形を変形しても同等の結果が得られるが、
説明を簡単にするため、期待する図形の変形の場合につ
いてのみ説明する。
The above object is achieved by calculating the goodness of fit, including possible deformations of expected figures. That is, when calculating the goodness of fit of a figure in a certain position in an image with the expected figure, try to shift the position of the figure to be judged variously in the vicinity, and The possible deformations are variously compared, and the degree of shifting the position of the figure and / or the degree of deformation of the figure becomes smaller, the smaller the degree of shifting the position of the figure and / or the deformation of the figure. With a weighting function that increases as the degree of degree decreases, the fitness degree is calculated in the same way as the conventional method, and whether or not there is an expected figure in the image is calculated based on the weighted average value of the weights with the corresponding weight. Make a decision. Here, the expected deformation of the figure can be obtained even if the figure to be judged of the image A is deformed.
For simplicity of explanation, only the case of expected deformation of the figure will be described.

【0006】[0006]

【作用】画像A内に於ける期待する図形Bの変形が確率
的になされている場合を考える。変形が確率的になされ
ていない場合であっても、現実世界のように非常に多く
の要素が絡み合って変形を発生せしめている場合には、
確率的な近似が可能である故、以下と同様に考えること
ができる。
Consider the case where the expected deformation of the figure B in the image A is stochastically performed. Even if the transformation is not done stochastically, if a large number of elements are intertwined and cause the transformation like in the real world,
Since probabilistic approximation is possible, it can be considered in the same way as the following.

【0007】画像A中の図形Bが変形してそれに類似の
図形B'になる確率をp(B’|B)とすれば、図形B'
を含む画像Aが得られる確率はp(A|B’)・p
(B’|B)・p(B)と書ける。上記の判定対象とす
る図形の位置を画像上でずらすことと期待する図形の変
形を考慮した適合度の計算によると、この確率をB'に
関して積分、近似的には重み付き和をとったものとして
得られる。即ち、図形Bが存在するという仮定のもとで
画像Aが得られる事後確率を求め、それを最大にするB
を求めていることになる。即ち、位置の変更、変形を考
えた上での事後確率最大解を求めていることになる。
If the probability that the figure B in the image A is transformed into a figure B'similar to it is p (B '| B), the figure B'
The probability that an image A containing a is obtained is p (A | B ') p
It can be written as (B '| B) p (B). According to the calculation of the goodness of fit considering the displacement of the figure to be judged on the image and the expected deformation of the figure, this probability is integrated with respect to B ′, and approximately the weighted sum is obtained. Obtained as. That is, the posterior probability that the image A is obtained is calculated under the assumption that the figure B exists, and B is maximized.
Will be seeking. That is, the maximum posterior probability solution is obtained in consideration of position change and deformation.

【0008】[0008]

【実施例】本発明は一般のデ−タ処理装置すなわち、入
出力装置、メモリおよび中央処理装置よりなるいわゆる
コンピュ−タによって実施できるので、実施例としての
装置の説明は省略する。以下の説明では画像デ−タは、
例えば、撮像装置をとうしてシリアル信号としてデ−タ
処理装置に導入され、一定の明度を基準値として明度0
または明度1を持つデ−タとしてメモリに記憶されて処
理される。図形デ−タも同様に入力されても良いが、文
字認識などでは辞書の形で事前に与えれるものであって
も良い。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Since the present invention can be implemented by a general data processing device, that is, a so-called computer comprising an input / output device, a memory and a central processing unit, description of the device as an embodiment is omitted. In the following explanation, the image data is
For example, it is introduced into a data processing device as a serial signal through an image pickup device, and a constant lightness is used as a reference value and the lightness is 0
Alternatively, the data having a brightness of 1 is stored in the memory and processed. Although the figure data may be similarly input, it may be given in advance in the form of a dictionary for character recognition or the like.

【0009】以下実施例を図1及び図2に従って説明す
る。図1と図2とは実体としては同じものであるが、図
1が全体の概念をPAD図として示したのにたいし、図
2では計算機のプログラムの形を主体としたPAD図を
示す。本実施例では、明度が0、1の2種類からなる2
値画像であって、地の部分が明度0,中央付近に明度1
の図形部分があり、ある頻度で反転するような雑音が重
畳した画像から、該図形の形状、その有無を判断する図
形認識を考える。
An embodiment will be described below with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2. Although FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are the same in substance, FIG. 1 shows the overall concept as a PAD diagram, whereas FIG. 2 shows a PAD diagram mainly for the form of a computer program. In the present embodiment, two types of lightness 0 and 1 are used.
A value image, where the ground part has a brightness of 0 and the brightness near the center is 1
Consider the figure recognition for judging the shape of the figure and the presence / absence of the figure from an image in which there is a figure part and noise that is inverted at a certain frequency is superimposed.

【0010】画像Aはn*m個のピクセルが正方格子状
に並んだものとする。また期待する図形Bはp*q個の
ピクセルが正方格子状に並んだものとする。画像Aのピ
クセルの座標原点は左上とし、右方へx座標、下方へy
座標を採る。即ち、左上を(0,0)、その右側が(1,0)、さ
らにその右側が(2,0)となる。原点の下方が(0,1)、その
下方が(0,2)となる。図形Bの基準点を画像Aと同様左
上とする。図形上の座標も画像と同様に採る。
The image A has n * m pixels arranged in a square lattice. The expected figure B is assumed to have p * q pixels arranged in a square lattice. The coordinate origin of the pixel of the image A is the upper left, the x coordinate is to the right, and the y is to the bottom.
Take the coordinates. That is, the upper left is (0,0), the right side is (1,0), and the right side is (2,0). Below the origin is (0,1) and below that is (0,2). Similarly to the image A, the reference point of the figure B is at the upper left. The coordinates on the figure are taken in the same way as the image.

【0011】画像A上の(x,y)に図形Bの基準点が
ある時の画像Aと図形Bとの適合度を
When the reference point of the figure B is located at (x, y) on the image A, the matching degree between the image A and the figure B is shown.

【0012】[0012]

【数1】 [Equation 1]

【0013】で定める。但し、δ(u,v)はu=vの
とき1、その他のとき0となる関数である。これは画像
Aと図形Bとが重なっているピクセル全てに付いて、各
ピクセル値(明度)が画像Aと図形Bとで同じであれば
δ=1、異なっていればδ=0とする値を総和したもの
である。これをf(A,B,x,y)で表す。変形は、
図形B中の明度0と明度1の境部分のピクセル値を1個
ないし複数個反転させるものを考える。r個反転したも
のの重みをexp(−r)とする。
Specified by. However, δ (u, v) is a function that becomes 1 when u = v and 0 otherwise. This is a value for all pixels where the image A and the figure B overlap, and δ = 1 if the pixel values (brightness) are the same between the image A and the figure B, and δ = 0 if they are different. Is the sum of This is represented by f (A, B, x, y). The transformation is
Consider that one or a plurality of pixel values at the boundary between the brightness 0 and the brightness 1 in the figure B are inverted. The weight of r inversions is set to exp (-r).

【0014】図形B中の明度0と明度1の境にあるピク
セルを取り出し、その座標を配列b(図2ステップ10
00)に記憶する。その個数をlとする。即ち、該座標
はb(0)〜b(l−1)に記憶される。図形Bの基準
点を画像A上に於て可能な範囲で動かす(図1ステップ
10;図2ステップ1010、以下簡単のため図の番号
とステップの表現は省略する)。この配置に於ける画像
Aと図形Bの適合度を計算する(30;1030)。考
慮すべき変形方法全てにわたって図形Bを変形する(4
0;1040)。この手続きの内反転すべきr個を順番
に選び出す方法に付いては、例えば、シーエーシーエ
ム、5(1962年)第344頁(CACM,Vol.
5(1962)p344)に記されている方法が使用で
きる。図形Bのピクセルの内、選び出されたr個の座標
のピクセルを反転して得られる図形をB’とする。第s
番目に得られた図形B’をB’(s)と記す。このよう
にして図形Bを変形して得た全ての図形B’に付いてそ
の適合度を計算し、重みとの積をとり和をとる(60;
1060)。得られた値(適合度としての値を意味し、
cで表示する。)を基準点の位置と共に記憶する(7
0;1060)。
Pixels on the boundary between lightness 0 and lightness 1 in figure B are extracted and their coordinates are arranged in array b (step 10 in FIG. 2).
00). Let the number be l. That is, the coordinates are stored in b (0) to b (l-1). The reference point of the figure B is moved within a possible range on the image A (step 10 in FIG. 1; step 1010 in FIG. 2; hereinafter, for simplification, illustration of numbers and steps are omitted). The degree of conformity between the image A and the figure B in this arrangement is calculated (30; 1030). The figure B is transformed over all the transformation methods to be considered (4
0; 1040). For a method of sequentially selecting r pieces to be reversed in this procedure, see, for example, CAMC, 5 (1962), page 344 (CACM, Vol.
5 (1962) p344) can be used. Of the pixels of figure B, the figure obtained by inverting the pixels of the r selected coordinates is B '. S
The figure B ′ obtained next is referred to as B ′ (s). In this way, the goodness of fit is calculated for all the figures B ′ obtained by deforming the figure B, and the product is multiplied with the weights to obtain the sum (60;
1060). The obtained value (meaning the value as the goodness of fit,
Display with c. ) Together with the position of the reference point (7
0; 1060).

【0015】以上の計算が基準点の可能な位置全てで終
了したら、その中での最大値を取り出す(80;108
0)。その最大値が所定の値以上であれば、図形Bが画
像A中に含まれていると判断する(90;1090)。
When the above calculation is completed at all possible positions of the reference point, the maximum value among them is taken out (80; 108).
0). If the maximum value is equal to or larger than the predetermined value, it is determined that the graphic B is included in the image A (90; 1090).

【0016】次に前記の実施例のうちステップ40−9
0の部分を変形した実施例を図3のPAD図に示す。こ
の場合も先の実施例と同じ問題を考える。但し、図形B
はn*m個のピクセルで構成され画像Aと同じ大きさで
あるものとし、次式で示すマルコフ・ランダム場の定常
確率に等しい生起確率を持つものとする。
Next, step 40-9 of the above embodiment.
An embodiment in which the 0 part is modified is shown in the PAD diagram of FIG. Also in this case, the same problem as in the previous embodiment is considered. However, figure B
Is composed of n * m pixels and has the same size as the image A, and has an occurrence probability equal to the stationary probability of the Markov random field shown by the following equation.

【0017】[0017]

【数2】 [Equation 2]

【0018】以下、マルコフ・ランダム場、確率、エネ
ルギーの用語、及び図3のステップ2040,205
0,2052,2054,2056で用いる遷移確率の
定め方の正当性については、アイイーイーイー、ピーエ
イエムアイ−6(1984)、第721頁から第741
頁(IEEE,vol.PAMI−6(1984),p
p.721−741)に記載されている。
Below, Markov random fields, probabilities, energy terms, and steps 2040, 205 of FIG.
No. 0, 2052, 2054, 2056, the validity of the method of determining the transition probability is described in IEE, PMI-6 (1984), pages 721 to 741.
Page (IEEE, vol. PAMI-6 (1984), p.
p. 721-741).

【0019】さて、このとき、定常確率を与えるエネル
ギー関数は
At this time, the energy function giving the stationary probability is

【0020】[0020]

【数3】 [Equation 3]

【0021】となる。また、[0021] Also,

【0022】[0022]

【数4】 [Equation 4]

【0023】と略記する。It is abbreviated as

【0024】図形Bを変形した図形である図形B’は乱
数又は疑似乱数を用いてランダムに生成される(203
0,2040,2050)。先ず、図形B内の変更すべ
き点の座標をランダムに選ぶ(2030)。次に、i,
jにおける明度を0にするか、1にするかを、やはり、
ランダムに決定する(2040,2050,2052,
2054,2056)。こうして構成された図形が、一
つの変形図形である。この図形と画像Aとの適合度を実
施例1と同様に求める(2060,2062)。図形
B’に対応する重みは図形Bと図形B’のピクセル内の
ことなるものの個数をrとするときexp(−r)とす
る。この両者を用いてcを更新する(2060,206
2)。ここで得た図形B’を元にして次の変形(203
0〜2062)を行なう。
A graphic B ', which is a modified graphic of the graphic B, is randomly generated using a random number or a pseudo random number (203).
0, 2040, 2050). First, the coordinates of points to be changed in the figure B are randomly selected (2030). Then i,
Whether to set the lightness at j to 0 or 1
Randomly determined (2040, 2050, 2052,
2054, 2056). The graphic thus configured is one deformed graphic. The degree of matching between this figure and the image A is obtained in the same manner as in the first embodiment (2060, 2062). The weight corresponding to the figure B'is set to exp (-r) where r is the number of different things in the pixels of the figure B and the figure B '. C is updated using both of these (2060, 206
2). Based on the figure B'obtained here, the following transformation (203
0 to 2062).

【0025】以上を所定回数繰り返す(2020)。c
の値は、一般に繰り返し数に比例するので、得られたc
を、繰り返し回数で除す(2070)。除算の結果の値
cが予め定められた値以上であれば、図形Bがあったと
判断する(2090)。
The above is repeated a predetermined number of times (2020). c
Since the value of is generally proportional to the number of iterations, the obtained c
Is divided by the number of repetitions (2070). If the value c as a result of the division is equal to or larger than a predetermined value, it is determined that the figure B exists (2090).

【0026】[0026]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、与図形に考慮し得る変
形を施した図形の適合度合を加味して、与図形と与画像
との適合度合を計算しているため、与図形が変形して与
画像中に含まれる場合にも高い信頼性で、与図形が含ま
れていることが検知できるという効果がある。先にも述
べたように、この図形の変更は、逆に画像の変形として
も同様に実施でき、同様の結果が得られる。
As described above, according to the present invention, the matching degree between a given figure and a given image is calculated in consideration of the matching degree of the transformed figure that can be considered in the given figure. Then, even when the given image is included in the given image, it is possible to detect with high reliability that the given figure is included. As described above, this modification of the figure can be similarly performed as a modification of the image, and the same result can be obtained.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】実施例の全体の概念を示すPAD図FIG. 1 is a PAD diagram showing the overall concept of an embodiment.

【図2】実施例を計算機のプログラムの形を主体として
示すPAD図
FIG. 2 is a PAD diagram mainly showing an embodiment of a computer program form.

【図3】実施例の一部を変更した計算機のプログラムの
形を主体として示すPAD図
FIG. 3 is a PAD diagram mainly showing a computer program form in which a part of the embodiment is modified.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】画像Aの中に図形B又はそれと類似の図形
が含まれているか否かを調べる図形認識方法に於て、所
定の形のデ−タで与えられる画像Aの上の座標に所定の
形のデ−タで与えられる図形Bの基準点を重ねた時の図
形Bの画像Aに対する適合度を計算することと、図形B
または画像Aを変形し、かつ変更後の図形B’または画
像A’と元の図形Bまたは画像A’との類似度が高い程
大きく、類似度が低い程小さい値となる重みを定めるこ
とと、基準点を変更しながら次々と図形Bの類似図形
B’と図形Bの類似図形B’に対する重みまたは画像A
の類似画像A’と画像Aの類似画像A’に対する重みと
を求めながら、該類似図形B’と画像Aとの適合度また
は類似画像A’と図形Bとの適合度を求め、かつ、該重
みによる該適合度の重み付き和を求めることと、画像A
の上の座標を動かしながら、その点を基準点として前記
の計算を繰返し行い得られた値の和を求めその値の最大
値、又は近似的な最大値を求め、それが予め定めた基準
値を越えていれば、該図形Bが該画像A中にあると判断
することとよりなる図形認識方法。
1. A graphic recognition method for checking whether or not a graphic B or a graphic similar to the graphic B is included in the image A, in which coordinates on the image A given by data of a predetermined shape are set. Calculating the degree of conformity of the graphic B to the image A when the reference points of the graphic B given by the data of the predetermined shape are superposed, and
Alternatively, the image A is deformed, and the weight is determined such that the higher the degree of similarity between the changed figure B ′ or image A ′ and the original figure B or image A ′ is, the smaller the lower the degree of similarity is. , The weight of the similar pattern B ′ of the pattern B and the similar pattern B ′ of the pattern B or the image A while changing the reference point.
Of the similar image A ′ and the weight of the image A to the similar image A ′, the degree of matching between the similar pattern B ′ and the image A or the degree of matching between the similar image A ′ and the pattern B is calculated, and Finding the weighted sum of the goodness-of-fit by weighting the image A
While moving the coordinates on the point, repeat the above calculation using that point as a reference point to find the sum of the values obtained, and find the maximum value or an approximate maximum value, which is the predetermined reference value. If it exceeds, it is judged that the figure B is in the image A, and the figure recognition method.
JP3300220A 1991-11-15 1991-11-15 Pattern recognition method Pending JPH05135178A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3300220A JPH05135178A (en) 1991-11-15 1991-11-15 Pattern recognition method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3300220A JPH05135178A (en) 1991-11-15 1991-11-15 Pattern recognition method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH05135178A true JPH05135178A (en) 1993-06-01

Family

ID=17882169

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP3300220A Pending JPH05135178A (en) 1991-11-15 1991-11-15 Pattern recognition method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH05135178A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997015792A1 (en) 1995-10-26 1997-05-01 Izena Co., Ltd. Air-conditioned construction of floor and ceiling

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997015792A1 (en) 1995-10-26 1997-05-01 Izena Co., Ltd. Air-conditioned construction of floor and ceiling

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3483767B1 (en) Device for detecting variant malicious code on basis of neural network learning, method therefor, and computer-readable recording medium in which program for executing same method is recorded
US8472721B2 (en) Pattern identification unit generation method, information processing apparatus, computer program, and storage medium
US8280196B2 (en) Image retrieval apparatus, control method for the same, and storage medium
JP4588575B2 (en) Method, apparatus and program for detecting multiple objects in digital image
US9275305B2 (en) Learning device and method, recognition device and method, and program
JP2002516440A (en) Image recognition and correlation system
JP5431362B2 (en) Feature-based signature for image identification
CN116721301B (en) Training method, classifying method, device and storage medium for target scene classifying model
CN111951283A (en) Medical image identification method and system based on deep learning
CN111275126A (en) Sample data set generation method, device, equipment and storage medium
JP2007025902A (en) Image processor and image processing method
CN110135428A (en) Image segmentation processing method and device
JP3311077B2 (en) Image retrieval device
Park et al. Deformed lattice discovery via efficient mean-shift belief propagation
US20080205760A1 (en) Comparison of Patterns
US20230394871A1 (en) Method for verifying the identity of a user by identifying an object within an image that has a biometric characteristic of the user and separating a portion of the image comprising the biometric characteristic from other portions of the image
JP2019125204A (en) Target recognition device, target recognition method, program and convolution neural network
US6690829B1 (en) Classification system with reject class
CN108447066B (en) Biliary tract image segmentation method, terminal and storage medium
JPH05135178A (en) Pattern recognition method
CN114357220A (en) Similar medical image calculation method based on locality sensitive hashing algorithm
JPH08263522A (en) Image retrieving method
JP7252591B2 (en) Image processing method and image processing apparatus by geometric shape matching
JP2009059047A (en) Device, method and program for detecting object
JP2005502960A (en) Architecture for processing fingerprint images