JPH0415033B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0415033B2
JPH0415033B2 JP57095664A JP9566482A JPH0415033B2 JP H0415033 B2 JPH0415033 B2 JP H0415033B2 JP 57095664 A JP57095664 A JP 57095664A JP 9566482 A JP9566482 A JP 9566482A JP H0415033 B2 JPH0415033 B2 JP H0415033B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
grade
sorted
class
sorting
thickness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP57095664A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS58214381A (en
Inventor
Taichi Horii
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maki Manufacturing Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Maki Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Maki Manufacturing Co Ltd filed Critical Maki Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority to JP9566482A priority Critical patent/JPS58214381A/en
Publication of JPS58214381A publication Critical patent/JPS58214381A/en
Publication of JPH0415033B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0415033B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

[産業上の利用分野] 本発明は、きゆうり、長ナス等の長尺そ菜類
を、撮像手段を用いて撮像した結果に基づき、階
級別、等級別に仕分けする選別方法に関するもの
である。 [従来の技術] きゆうり、長ナス等の長尺そ菜類は、工場生産
品と異なり天産物であるため、その形状、姿は多
種多様に変化しており、通常、選果場では、これ
らのそ菜類、例えばきゆうりを等級判定する場
合、等級判定するための判定基準のうち数値化さ
れているものについては第1表の如き選別規格が
用いられ、又、数値化されていない等級判定基準
(各農協毎に定められた目視判定基準)について
は、第1図の(ニ)〜(ト)に示す如き容姿不良物を写真
等により図示して文章表現により説明を加えたも
のが用いられている。そして前記第1表に数値化
された選別規格に基づいて自動で等級格付けされ
たきゆうりに対し、この文章表現された等級判定
基準を基に容姿不良物を選別人の目視判定で等級
各下げし、商品価値の向上を計つているのが現状
である。 即ち、前記数値化されていないきゆうりの等級
判定基準の要素は、第1図(ニ)「腹白」、(ホ)端部が
局部的に短く曲つた「首曲り」、(ヘ)端部が局部的
に細い「つる首、尻細」、(ト)端部が局部的に太い
「首太、尻太」等の項目であり、選別されるきゆ
うりが全国共通の選別規格である「太さと曲り」
について「秀品」内であつても、前記第1図(ニ)、
(ホ)、(ヘ)、(ト)、の項のいずれかにその容姿が該当し
た場合、該秀品のきゆうりは「秀でなく優品」に
格下げされ、こうして出荷するきゆうりの品質を
揃え商品価値の向上に努めているのが現状であ
る。 一方、従来果実、そ菜類をテレビカメラ、
CCDカメラ、MOS型一次元イメージセンサカメ
ラ等の撮像装置を用いてその外径、長さ、全長に
わたつての曲り等を計測し選別する方法、装置等
については多数の技術文献が刊行され、これらの
技術を応用したものとして特開昭54−145164号公
報等が公知である。 [発明が解決しようとする課題) しかしながら、上記特開昭54−145164号公報の
公知のものは、各県農業協同組合連合会で決めら
れた青果物(園芸品)選別、荷造り規格に具体的
に数値で示された等級判定要素としての太さ及び
全長にわたつての曲りと、階級判定要素としての
長さとを計測して選別する方法に関するものであ
り、前述した数値化されていない等級判定要素が
取り入れられておらず、これを取り入れることが
未解決のままであり、この公知の方法を用いた施
設では、施設費が高価な割には選別の結果に不満
があつた。 即ち、この公知のものでは、太さ、曲りが秀の
規格内(例えば秀Mは曲り15ミリ以内)である場
合、その曲りが全長にわたつて彎曲した曲りのも
のは秀と判定されてよいが、秀から優へ格下げす
べき第1図の(ホ)に示すように端部が局部的に曲つ
たものまで秀と判定する欠点があり、この欠点は
このような容姿不良つまり長尺そ菜類の端部の形
状を表わす特徴が等級(秀、優、良、並)の判定
要素として取り入れられていないことによる欠点
であつた。又、このような等級判定要素について
選別人により行なわれる目視判定では、人により
判定基準がやや異なることは否めず、目視判定結
果に個人差によるバラツキがあるという欠点があ
つた。更に、前記公知のものはきゆうりを全面に
わたつて観測し画像解析するので処理時間が長く
かかり、処理能力が向上しなかつた。 本発明は、これらの欠点を解消し、高速度で且
つバラツキがなく高精度で等級判定を行なうこと
のできる長尺そ菜類の選別方法を提供することを
目的とする。 [課題を解決するための手段] 上記目的を達成するために、本発明は、選別コ
ンベア上で搬送される被選別物としての長尺そ菜
類を撮像手段により撮像し、その撮像の解析によ
り被選別物の形状による等級、階級判定要素を計
測し、該計測結果に基づいて被選別物の等級、階
級を判定し、該判定結果により被選別物を等級
別、階級別に仕分けする選別方法において、前記
階級判定要素として長さを計測することにより被
選別物の階級を判定し、前記等級判定要素として
太さと曲りと更に両端部の形状を表わす特徴量の
うち少なくとも両端部夫々における巾中心線上の
所定の三点を中心部側から順次結んだ直線の折れ
角とを計測することにより被選別物の等級を判定
する長尺そ菜類の選別方法の構成としたものであ
り、こうして被選別物の太さと全長にわたつての
曲りとの計測による等級判定だけでは「秀」の範
囲内となるものであつても、両端部の形状を表わ
す特徴量のうち少なくとも両端部の前記折れ角を
計測することにより、端部の容姿不良の場合に
は、「秀」を「優」に等級格下げ判定して品質を
揃え、商品価値を高めることができるようになし
たものである。 [実施例] 以下本発明の好ましい一実施例を図面を参照し
て説明する。 第2図は、長尺そ菜類、例えばきゆうりを選別
するための選別装置要部を示すものであり、その
概要について説明すれば、1は選別コンベアのバ
ケツト、2は被選別物であり、例えばきゆうりで
ある。被選別物2のきゆうりを載せるバケツト1
は、載置面が光を殆んど反射しない黒色の光吸収
面をなしており、且つ表面が多少汚れてもその汚
れが撮像されないようになつている。3は撮像装
置であり、ビジコン等撮像管を用いたテレビカメ
ラ、またはCCDやMOS型固体撮像素子を用いた
公知のカメラが用いられる。4は照明装置であ
り、撮像装置3が撮像管カメラの場合はストロボ
フラツシユ、固体撮像素子カメラの場合はランプ
が用いられ、被選別物2を照射する。5は選別コ
ンベアのバケツトクロツク信号用のスイツチであ
り、各バケツト1が撮像位置に達する毎に撮像開
始のタイミングを与えるクロツク信号を出力する
ものである。6はロータリーエンコーダーであつ
て、選別コンベアの走行移動量を符号化した信号
として出すものである。即ち、選別コンベア走行
移動量100ミリに対して1000パルスを出すもので、
該選別コンベアが0.1ミリ移動するのに対して1
パルスの割合で信号を出力する。 7は画像処理演算装置であり、ビデオ信号スラ
イサー、メモリー、像解析部、規格値設定部、演
算部、選別仕分け出力部、電源部等で構成してい
る。上記の如く選別装置を構成するとともに、被
選別物2としてきゆうりの選別規格、即ち階級、
等級判定要素項目を下記の通りに設定する。 (イ)長さ(階級)、(ロ)太さ(等級)、(ハ)曲り(等
級)、(ニ)腹白(格下げ)、(ホ)首曲り[端部の折れ
角](格下げ)、(ヘ)つる首、尻細[端部の太さ]
(格下げ)、(ト)尻太、首太[端部の太さ](格下げ) 上記(イ)〜(ト)の7項目について第2表の選別規格
表を参照して説明すれば夫々下記の要領で計測す
る。 先ず前記(イ)項の長さによる階級付けについて
は、第3図に示す如く被測定物像2′の両端から
所定距離内側の巾中心点a,bを結ぶ直線距離l
を長さとして計測する。この両端部のa,b点は
例えば両端部の太さが一定のx寸法に達した部分
の巾中心点をa,bとする場合と、両端から一定
のy寸法部分の巾中心点をa,bとする場合とが
あるが、後者が好ましい。この計測された長さ寸
法lを、前記画像処理演算装置7の規格値設定部
にデジタルスイツチで予め設定された階級区分値
と比較することによつて、被選別物2はLL、L、
M、S、SS、のいずれかの階級に判定される。 次に前記(ロ)項の太さによる等級格付けについて
は、第4図に示す如く被測定物像2′の両端部の
点a,bから更にc寸法を加えた部分を除去した
中間部分l1の範囲を、小寸法l2毎に複数個所例え
ばn個所でその部分の太さD1,D2,D3,Doを計
測する。このD1,D2,D3,Doは巾中心線(以下
中心線という)sと直角な向きで計測し、D1
Do寸法の中から最小寸法と最大寸法とを検出し、
この値と前記規格値設定部に予め設定された等級
区分値とを夫々比較し、大小いずれかが該当する
下級の等級に被選別物2が格付けされる。即ち中
位の太さのものを最良の秀級とし、これよりやや
太いもの又はやや細いものを優級とし、更に太い
か又は細いものを良級として格付けされる。 実験によると測定点間距離、即ちl2の小寸法を
10ミリ〜20ミリ程度で良好な太さ基準の格付けを
することができた。 次に前記(ハ)項の曲りによる等級格付けについて
は、第5図に示す如く被測定物像2′の両端部の
点a,bを結ぶ直線wに対して、前記太さを計測
した各測定中心点s1,s2,s3,soから下ろした垂
線v1,v2,v3,voのうち最大寸法vnaxを曲りの寸
法とし、この値と前記規格値設定部に長さ階級毎
に予め設定された等級区分値と比較し該当する等
級に被選別物2は格付けされる。 等級を格付けする前記(ロ)、(ハ)の2項目の計測結
果が夫々異なる等級(例えば、太さが秀、曲りが
優又は良、又はこれらの逆の組合せ)に格付けさ
れた場合、その中で最下位に属する等級をもつて
被選別物2の等級として格付けされる。 次に前記(ニ)の腹白による等級格下げについて
は、第6図に示す如く、被選別物の映像信号から
その出力レベルを外形シキイ値hνと、腹白シキ
イ値Hνとで際像の面積Eと腹白部面積Fとを
夫々計測し、Eに対するFの割合をG%として算
出し、この値と前記規格値設定部に予め設定され
た腹白格下げ区分値と比較し該当した場合、被選
別物2は前記(ロ)、(ハ)項によつて等級格付けされた
等級ついて一等級格下げされた等級に判定され
る。尚、この腹白による等級格下げは本発明では
用いなくてよい。 次に前記(ホ)項の首曲り[端部の折れ角]による
等級格下げについては、第7図に示す如くa点と
s0点を通る直線j0と、s1点とs0点を通る直線k0
が交差する角度即ち端部における中心線s上の所
定の三点a,s0,s1を端側とは反対側の中央部側
から順次結んだ直線の折れ角θa(3点をa,s0
s1を結んでできる鈍角<as0s1の補角)を首曲り
として計測する。又対称側もb点とsn点を通る直
線jnと、so点とSn点を通る直線knとが交差する角
度即ち端部における中心線s上の所定の三点b,
sn,soを端側とは反対側の中央部側から順次結ん
だ直線の折れ角θb(3点b,sn,soを結んででき
る鈍角<bsn,soの補角)を首曲りとして計測す
る。そしてこの計測した両端部の折れ角θa,θb
いずれか大きい方を首曲り角度θとして算出し、
この値と前記規格値設定部に予め設定された首曲
り格下げ区分値と比較し該当した場合に被選別物
2は一等級格下げされる。 即ち、この等級格下げ方法によれば、格下げ区
分値と比較して該当した場合に、前記(ロ)太さ、(ハ)
曲りの2項目の等級格付けによつて格付けされた
等級が、更に一つ下位の等級に格下げされて等級
判定される。例えば前記(ロ)、(ハ)の等級格付け項目
ですべてが秀と最上位に格付けされていた「秀
品」の被選別物2が、前記(ホ)項の首曲り角度θが
規格値より大なる曲りであつた場合、この被選別
物2は容姿不良として「優品」に格下げされて等
級判定される。又前記(ロ)、(ハ)の等級格付け項目で
優と格付けされていた「優品」の被選別物2が、
前記(ホ)項の首曲り角度θが規格値より大なる曲り
であつた場合、この被選別物2は容姿不良として
「良品」に格下げされて等級判定される。 又、前記(ホ)項の首曲りによる等級格下げ方法に
ついて、実験によると第7図におけるi,iが20
〜25ミリで、且つ首曲り角θを20度程度に設定す
ることにより、良好な容姿判定結果を得ることが
できた。 尚、図中の符号i及びθの設定値は可変式であ
るので、品種や時期による市場価格とに関連して
規格値を適宜変更して使用することが好ましい。 次に前記(ヘ)項のつる首、尻細[端部の太さ]に
よる等級格下げについては、第8図に示す如く両
端部の所定点s0点とsn点とにおける太さd0,dn
法を中心線sと直角な向きで計測してその寸法
d0,dnのいずれか細い方をつる首、尻細dとし、
この値と前記規格値設定部に予め設定されたつる
首尻細の格下げ区分値と比較して該当した場合
(規格値より細かつた場合)、被選別物2は前記
(ロ)、(ハ)項によつて等級格付けされた等級について
一等級格下げされた等級に判定される。 実験によると区分値を太さDの2/3程度に設定
することにより良好な容姿判定結果を得ることが
できた。 次に前記(ト)項の尻太、首太[端部の太さ]につ
いては、第9図に示す如く前記(ヘ)項と同じくs0
とsn点における太さD0,Dnを中心線sと直角な
向きで計測してその寸法D0,Dnのいずれか大き
い方を尻太、首太Dとし、この値と前記規格値設
定部に予め設定された尻太、首太の格下げ区分値
と比較して該当した場合(規格値より太かつた場
合)、被選別物2は前記(ロ)、(ハ)項によつて等級格
付けされた等級について一等級格下げされた等級
に判定される。 尚、等級の格下げは、判定要素項目(ホ)、(ヘ)、(ト)
の一つが規格値設定部に予め設定された夫々の
個々の格下げ区分値に該当した場合や、複数が該
当した場合(例えば「首曲り」と「尻太」の2項
目)でも一等級だけ格下げされ、等級が判定され
るものである。 又本説明中の計測とは撮像解析による計測のこ
とである。 本発明に用いる選別装置は、第2図の1〜6を
組み合わせた装置、及び他の各種の選別機として
公知の選別装置を用いることができ、バケツトの
形状と大きさとを被選別物の形状、大きさに合わ
せ任意に設計して用いることが好ましい。 [発明の効果] 本発明は、以上の如く、撮像した被測定物像
2′の巾中心線に沿つて計測点をa,s0,s1,s2
s3……so,sn,b等と定めて計測するので像解析
計測速度が速く、従来のものと比較して一段と処
理能力を向上させることができる。 又、本発明は、被選別物としての長尺そ菜類を
選別するのに、長さを計測することにより階級を
判定し、太さと曲りと更に両端部の形状を表わす
特徴量のうち少なくとも両端部夫々における巾中
心線上の所定の三点を中央部側から順次結んだ直
線の折れ角を計測することにより被選別物の等級
を判定するものであるから、等級判定要素として
太さと全長にわたつての曲りとを計測する従来の
ものでは判定できなかつたり両端部の容姿不良、
時に首曲りとしての前記折れ角が等級判定に自動
的に加味されて等級判定されるので、判定結果に
目視判定によるようなバラツキがなく、高精度で
等級判定を行なうことができ、ひいては、被選別
物の品質を揃え得て商品価値を高めることができ
る。
[Industrial Field of Application] The present invention relates to a sorting method for sorting long side dishes such as cucumbers and eggplants into classes and grades based on the results of imaging using an imaging means. [Conventional technology] Long vegetables such as cucumbers and long eggplants are natural products, unlike factory-produced products, so their shapes and appearances vary widely. When grading wild vegetables, such as Japanese cucumbers, the sorting standards shown in Table 1 are used for the grading criteria that are quantified, and the grading standards that are not quantified are used. Regarding the standards (visual judgment standards established by each agricultural cooperative), the ones used are ones that illustrate objects with poor appearance as shown in (d) to (g) in Figure 1 using photographs, etc., and add explanations using written expressions. It is being Then, for the yellow cucumbers that have been automatically graded based on the sorting standards quantified in Table 1, those with poor appearance are lowered in grade by visual judgment by the sorter based on the grading criteria expressed in text. Currently, the company is trying to improve its product value. In other words, the elements of the criteria for grading the yellow lily that have not been quantified are (d) "white belly", (e) "bent neck" where the end is locally short, and (f) the end. Items such as "hang neck, narrow end" where the part is locally thin, "thick neck, thick end" where the end is locally thick, etc., and the selection standards are common throughout the country. "Thickness and curve"
Even if it is within the category of "excellent products", the above-mentioned Figure 1 (d),
If the appearance falls under any of the categories (E), (F), and (G), the quality of the Kiyuuri will be downgraded to "excellent, not excellent," and the quality of the Kiyuuri to be shipped will be reduced. The current situation is that we are striving to improve the value of our lineup of products. On the other hand, conventionally, fruits and vegetables are photographed by TV cameras.
Many technical documents have been published on methods and devices for measuring and sorting the outer diameter, length, and bending over the entire length using imaging devices such as CCD cameras and MOS type one-dimensional image sensor cameras. Applications of these techniques are known in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 54-145164. [Problems to be Solved by the Invention] However, the publicly known Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 54-145164 does not specifically meet the standards for sorting and packing fruits and vegetables (horticultural products) determined by each prefectural agricultural cooperative federation. This relates to a method of measuring and selecting the thickness and curvature over the entire length, which are numerically indicated grade determining factors, and the length, which is a class determining factor, and the above-mentioned non-numeric grade determining factors. has not been adopted, and the question of how to incorporate it remains unresolved, and facilities using this known method have been dissatisfied with the screening results despite the high facility costs. In other words, in this known product, if the thickness and bending are within the standard for excellent (for example, the curve is within 15 mm for Hidden M), a curved item that is curved over the entire length may be determined to be excellent. However, as shown in (e) in Figure 1, which should be downgraded from excellent to excellent, there is a drawback that even locally curved edges are judged as excellent. This shortcoming was due to the fact that the feature representing the shape of the end of the class was not incorporated as a factor in determining the grade (excellent, excellent, good, average). Furthermore, in the visual judgment performed by sorters regarding such grade judgment factors, it is undeniable that the judgment criteria differ slightly depending on the person, and there is a drawback that the visual judgment results vary due to individual differences. Furthermore, since the above-mentioned known method observes the entire surface of the lily and performs image analysis, it takes a long time to process, and the processing capacity cannot be improved. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a method for sorting long side dishes, which eliminates these drawbacks and allows grade determination to be performed at high speed and with high accuracy without variation. [Means for Solving the Problems] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention images long side dishes as objects to be sorted conveyed on a sorting conveyor by an imaging means, and analyzes the images to determine the objects. In a sorting method that measures grade and class determination factors based on the shape of the sorted objects, determines the grade and class of the objects to be sorted based on the measurement results, and sorts the objects to be sorted by grade and class based on the determination results, The class of the object to be sorted is determined by measuring the length as the class determining element, and the class determining element is at least the width on the center line of each of the two ends, among the feature values representing the thickness, bending, and shape of both ends. This is a method for sorting long side dishes in which the grade of the object to be sorted is determined by measuring the bending angle of a straight line connecting three predetermined points sequentially from the center side. Even if the grade is determined only by measuring the thickness and the bend over the entire length, it is within the "Excellent" range, but at least the bend angle at both ends is measured among the feature quantities representing the shape of both ends. In this way, in the case of poor appearance at the edges, the grade is downgraded from "excellent" to "excellent", thereby making it possible to equalize the quality and increase the product value. [Embodiment] A preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. Figure 2 shows the main parts of a sorting device for sorting long side dishes, such as cucumbers.To give an overview, 1 is the bucket of the sorting conveyor, 2 is the material to be sorted, For example, Kiyuuri. Bucket 1 on which to place the cucumbers as the object to be sorted 2
The mounting surface is a black light-absorbing surface that hardly reflects light, and even if the surface is somewhat dirty, the dirt will not be imaged. 3 is an imaging device, and a television camera using an image pickup tube such as a vidicon, or a known camera using a CCD or MOS type solid-state imaging device is used. Reference numeral 4 denotes an illumination device, which illuminates the object 2 to be sorted using a strobe flash when the image pickup device 3 is an image pickup tube camera, and a lamp when the image pickup device 3 is a solid-state image pickup device camera. Reference numeral 5 denotes a switch for the bucket clock signal of the sorting conveyor, which outputs a clock signal that gives the timing to start imaging each time each bucket 1 reaches the imaging position. Reference numeral 6 is a rotary encoder which outputs the amount of travel of the sorting conveyor as a coded signal. In other words, it emits 1000 pulses for every 100 mm of movement of the sorting conveyor.
1 per 0.1 mm movement of the sorting conveyor
Outputs a signal at the rate of pulses. Reference numeral 7 denotes an image processing arithmetic unit, which includes a video signal slicer, a memory, an image analysis section, a standard value setting section, a calculation section, a sorting and sorting output section, a power supply section, and the like. In addition to configuring the sorting device as described above, the sorting standard of the material 2, that is, the class,
Set the grade determination element items as follows. (a) Length (class), (b) Thickness (class), (c) Curvature (class), (d) Belly white (downgrade), (e) Neck bend [bent angle at end] (downgrade) , (f) Hanging neck, thin end [thickness of the end]
(Downgrade), (G) Bottom thickness, neck thickness [end thickness] (Downgrade) The seven items (A) to (G) above are explained below with reference to the selection standard table in Table 2. Measure as follows. First of all, regarding the classification according to the length of the item (a) above, as shown in FIG.
is measured as length. Points a and b at both ends are, for example, when a and b are the width center points of the part where the thickness of both ends reaches a constant x dimension, and when a is the width center point of a constant y dimension part from both ends. , b, but the latter is preferred. By comparing this measured length dimension l with the class division value preset by a digital switch in the standard value setting section of the image processing arithmetic unit 7, the object to be sorted 2 is classified into LL, L,
It will be judged as one of the following classes: M, S, SS. Next, regarding the grading according to the thickness mentioned in item (b) above, as shown in Fig. 4, the middle part l is obtained by removing the part obtained by adding the dimension c from the points a and b at both ends of the object image 2'. 1 , the thicknesses D 1 , D 2 , D 3 , and Do of the portions are measured at a plurality of locations, for example, n locations, for each small dimension l 2 . These D 1 , D 2 , D 3 , and Do are measured in a direction perpendicular to the width center line (hereinafter referred to as the center line) s, and D 1 ~
Detect the minimum and maximum dimensions from the D o dimensions,
This value is compared with the grade division values preset in the standard value setting section, and the object 2 to be sorted is graded into the lower grade corresponding to either the size or the small value. That is, those of medium thickness are ranked as the best, Shu-grade, those that are slightly thicker or thinner are ranked as Superior, and those that are even thicker or thinner are ranked as Good. Experiments show that the distance between measurement points, i.e., the small dimension of l 2
We were able to grade the thickness based on a good thickness standard of about 10 mm to 20 mm. Next, regarding the grading according to the curvature in the above item (c), each of the thicknesses measured with respect to the straight line w connecting the points a and b at both ends of the object image 2' as shown in FIG. Among the perpendicular lines v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , and v o drawn from the measurement center points s 1 , s 2 , s 3 , and s o , the maximum dimension v nax is the bending dimension, and this value and the standard value setting section are The object 2 to be sorted is graded into the corresponding grade by comparing it with the preset grade division values for each length class. If the measurement results of the above two items (b) and (c) are rated in different grades (for example, thickness is excellent, bending is excellent or good, or the reverse combination of these), The grade belonging to the lowest among them is classified as the grade of the object to be sorted 2. Next, regarding the grade downgrading due to whiteness in the above (d), as shown in Fig. 6, the output level of the image signal of the object to be sorted is expressed as the outer shape value hν and the whiteness value Hν, and the area of the edge image is E and belly white area F are each measured, the ratio of F to E is calculated as G%, and this value is compared with the belly white downgrading category value preset in the standard value setting section. Sorted material 2 is determined to be a grade that is one grade lower than the grade that was graded according to items (b) and (c) above. Note that this downgrading based on blanks does not need to be used in the present invention. Next, regarding the grade downgrading due to the bent neck [bent angle at the end] in item (e) above, as shown in Figure 7, point a and
The angle at which the straight line j 0 passing through the s 0 point and the straight line k 0 passing through the s 1 and s 0 points intersect, that is, the predetermined three points a, s 0 , s 1 on the center line s at the end are on the end side The bending angle θ a of the straight line sequentially connected from the central part side on the opposite side (3 points are a, s 0 ,
The obtuse angle formed by connecting s 1 < supplementary angle of as 0 s 1 ) is measured as the neck bend. Also, on the symmetrical side, there are three predetermined points b on the center line s at the angle where the straight line j n passing through points b and s n and the straight line k n passing through points s o and s n intersect, that is, at the end.
Bending angle θ b of a straight line connecting s n and s o sequentially from the center side opposite to the end side (obtuse angle formed by connecting three points b, s n , and s o < supplementary angle of bs n and s o ) is measured as the neck bend. Then, the larger of the measured bending angles θ a and θ b at both ends is calculated as the neck bend angle θ,
This value is compared with the neck bend downgrade classification value preset in the standard value setting section, and if the value is found, the object to be sorted 2 is downgraded by one grade. That is, according to this grade downgrading method, if it falls under the downgrading classification value, the above (b) thickness, (c)
The grade that has been graded based on the two-item grade rating of bending is further downgraded to one lower grade, and then the grade is determined. For example, the item to be sorted 2, which is an "excellent" product that was rated as excellent in all of the grading items (b) and (c) above, has a neck bending angle θ in the item (e) that is lower than the standard value. If there is a large bend, the object 2 to be sorted is judged to have a poor appearance and is downgraded to "excellent" for grade determination. In addition, the material to be sorted 2, which is an "excellent" product that was rated as excellent in the grading items of (b) and (c) above,
If the neck bending angle θ in item (E) above is larger than the standard value, the object 2 to be sorted is judged to have a poor appearance and is downgraded to a "good product" and graded. Also, regarding the method of downgrading due to neck bending in item (e) above, according to experiments, i and i in Figure 7 are 20
By setting the neck angle θ to ~25 mm and approximately 20 degrees, we were able to obtain good appearance judgment results. Note that the set values of symbols i and θ in the figure are variable, so it is preferable to change the standard values as appropriate in relation to the market price depending on the product type and time. Next, regarding the grade downgrading due to the hanging neck and narrow end [thickness of the ends] in item (F) above, as shown in Figure 8, the thickness d 0 at the predetermined points s 0 and s n at both ends. , d Measure the n dimension perpendicular to the center line s and find the dimension
Let the thinner of d 0 and d n be the hanging neck and the thinner end d,
This value is compared with the downgrading classification value of the vine neck end fineness preset in the standard value setting section, and if it is applicable (if it is thinner than the standard value), the material to be sorted 2 is
The grade that has been graded under (b) and (c) will be determined to be a grade that has been downgraded by one grade. According to experiments, it was possible to obtain good appearance judgment results by setting the classification value to about 2/3 of the thickness D. Next, regarding the bottom thickness and neck thickness [thickness at the ends] in item (g) above, as shown in Figure 9, the thicknesses at point s 0 and point s n are D 0 and D as in item (f) above. n in a direction perpendicular to the center line s, and the larger of the dimensions D 0 and D n is defined as the bottom thickness and neck thickness D, and this value and the bottom thickness preset in the standard value setting section, When compared with the downgrading classification value of the neck thickness, if applicable (if it is thicker than the standard value), the material to be sorted 2 will be downgraded by one grade with respect to the grade rated according to the above (b) and (c). It will be judged according to the grade. In addition, the downgrading of the grade is based on the judgment factor items (E), (F), and (G).
If one of the items corresponds to each of the individual downgrading category values preset in the standard value setting section, or if multiple items apply (for example, two items of "bent neck" and "thick butt"), the downgrading will be by one grade only. and the grade is determined. Furthermore, the measurement in this description refers to measurement by imaging analysis. The sorting device used in the present invention can be a device combining 1 to 6 in FIG. , it is preferable to arbitrarily design and use it according to the size. [Effects of the Invention] As described above, the present invention sets the measurement points at a, s 0 , s 1 , s 2 , along the width center line of the imaged object to be measured 2 ' .
Since the measurement is performed by determining s 3 ...s o , s n , b, etc., the image analysis measurement speed is fast, and the processing capacity can be further improved compared to the conventional method. Further, the present invention determines the class by measuring the length when sorting long side dishes as objects to be sorted, and determines the class by measuring the length, and at least both ends of the feature values representing the thickness, bending, and shape of both ends. Since the grade of the material to be sorted is determined by measuring the bending angle of a straight line connecting three predetermined points on the width center line of each section sequentially from the center side, the thickness and overall length are used as grade determination factors. Conventional methods that measure the bending of the arm may not be able to determine it, or the appearance of both ends may be poor.
Since the bending angle as the bending of the neck is automatically taken into account when determining the grade, there is no dispersion in the determination results as would be the case with visual determination, and the grade can be determined with high accuracy. The quality of the sorted items can be made uniform and the product value can be increased.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】 【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

図面はいずれも本発明の実施例を示すものであ
り、第1図(イ)〜(ト)は被選別物の各種形状を示す説
明図、第2図は選別装置の要部説明図、第3,
4,5,6,7,8,9図の各図は長さ、太さ、
曲り、腹白、首曲り、つる首及び尻細、首太及び
尻太の各計測要領説明図を示す。 1……バケツト、2……被選別物、3……撮像
装置、4……照明装置、5……バケツトクロツク
信号用スイツチ、6……ロータリーエンコーダ
ー、7……画像処理演算装置、l……長さ、a,
b……測定点、s……巾中心線、D,d……太
さ、v……曲り寸法、G……腹白割合、E,F…
…像面積、θ,θa,θb……折れ角、s0,s1〜so
sn……各測定点。
The drawings all show embodiments of the present invention, and FIGS. 1(a) to (g) are explanatory diagrams showing various shapes of objects to be sorted, FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of the main parts of the sorting device, and FIG. 3,
Each figure in figures 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 shows the length, thickness,
An explanatory diagram of each measurement procedure for bending, belly white, neck bend, hanging neck and thin butt, thick neck and thick butt is shown. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1...Bucket, 2...Object to be sorted, 3...Imaging device, 4...Lighting device, 5...Bucket clock signal switch, 6...Rotary encoder, 7...Image processing calculation device, l... ...length, a,
b...Measurement point, s...Width center line, D, d...Thickness, v...Bending dimension, G...White belly ratio, E, F...
...Image area, θ, θ a , θ b ...Bending angle, s 0 , s 1 ~ s o ,
s n ...Each measurement point.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 選別コンベア上で搬送される被選別物として
の長尺そ菜類を撮像手段により撮像し、その撮像
の解析により被選別物の形状による等級、階級判
定要素を計測し、該計測結果に基づいて被選別物
の等級、階級を判定し、該判定結果により被選別
物を等級別、階級別に仕分けする選別方法におい
て、 前記階級判定要素として長さを計測することに
より被選別物の階級を判定し、前記等級判定要素
として太さと曲りと更に両端部の形状を表わす特
徴量のうち少なくとも両端部夫々における巾中心
線上の所定の三点を中央部側から順次結んだ直線
の折れ角とを計測することにより被選別物の等級
を判定することを特徴とする長尺そ菜類の選別方
法。 2 前記両端部の形状を表わす特徴量は、前記折
れ角と両端部の所定点S0,Snにおける太さとで
あることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項に記
載の長尺そ菜類の選別方法。 3 前記等級判定要素としての太さと曲りとは、
いずれも両端から夫々所定寸法(y+c)を除去
した中間部分における複数の所定個所において計
測されることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項
に記載の長尺そ菜類の選別方法。 4 前記階級判定要素としての長さは、両端から
夫々所定距離内側における巾中心点a,b間の直
線距離であることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第
1項に記載の長尺そ菜類の選別方法。
[Scope of Claims] 1. An imaging means captures an image of long side dishes as objects to be sorted conveyed on a sorting conveyor, and measures grade and class determination factors based on the shape of objects to be sorted by analyzing the images. A sorting method in which the grade and class of the objects to be sorted are determined based on the measurement results, and the objects to be sorted are sorted by grade and class based on the determination results, wherein the objects to be sorted are determined by measuring the length as the class determination element. The class of the object is determined, and among the feature values representing the thickness, curvature, and shape of both ends as the grade determination factors, at least a straight line connecting three predetermined points on the width center line at each end sequentially from the center side is used. A method for sorting long vegetables, characterized by determining the grade of the object to be sorted by measuring the bending angle. 2. The long side dish according to claim 1, wherein the feature amount representing the shape of the both ends is the bending angle and the thickness at predetermined points S 0 and S n of both ends. selection method. 3 Thickness and bending as the grade determination factors are as follows:
2. The method for sorting long side dishes according to claim 1, wherein the measurements are performed at a plurality of predetermined locations in the middle portion obtained by removing a predetermined dimension (y+c) from each end. 4. The length of the long side dish as set forth in claim 1, wherein the length as the class determination element is a straight line distance between the width center points a and b within a predetermined distance from both ends, respectively. Sorting method.
JP9566482A 1982-06-04 1982-06-04 Method of selecting long-sized vegetables Granted JPS58214381A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9566482A JPS58214381A (en) 1982-06-04 1982-06-04 Method of selecting long-sized vegetables

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9566482A JPS58214381A (en) 1982-06-04 1982-06-04 Method of selecting long-sized vegetables

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS58214381A JPS58214381A (en) 1983-12-13
JPH0415033B2 true JPH0415033B2 (en) 1992-03-16

Family

ID=14143757

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP9566482A Granted JPS58214381A (en) 1982-06-04 1982-06-04 Method of selecting long-sized vegetables

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS58214381A (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS61174980A (en) * 1985-01-29 1986-08-06 井関農機株式会社 Discrimination method in selector
IN165987B (en) * 1985-09-30 1990-02-17 Cra Services
JPS62241585A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-10-22 株式会社マキ製作所 Method and device for selecting long-sized vegetables
JP2010038650A (en) * 2008-08-01 2010-02-18 Denso Corp Method and device for inspecting width of tube in heat exchanger
US8406501B2 (en) * 2008-08-01 2013-03-26 Denso Corporation Method and system for inspection of tube width of heat exchanger

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS54145164A (en) * 1977-12-07 1979-11-13 Yanagihara Seisakusho:Kk Screening method of objects to be screened
JPS5518285A (en) * 1978-07-27 1980-02-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Automatic sorter

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS54145164A (en) * 1977-12-07 1979-11-13 Yanagihara Seisakusho:Kk Screening method of objects to be screened
JPS5518285A (en) * 1978-07-27 1980-02-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Automatic sorter

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS58214381A (en) 1983-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Miller et al. A color vision system for peach grading
CN101103246B (en) Automatic judging system
Strachan Recognition of fish species by colour and shape
US6310964B1 (en) Produce size recognition system
JPS5973089A (en) Electronic flaw scanner
CN106548480A (en) A kind of agricultural product volume rapid measurement device and measuring method based on machine vision
DE102007058505A1 (en) Optical distance sensor and optical distance measuring device
CA2147602A1 (en) Fish sorting machine
CN107614127A (en) Utilize the new optical grade system based on color of multiple reflection and multi-angle view
JPS59230144A (en) Method of automatically detecting defect of textile and fiber product of similar sheet-shaped structure
McClure Computer vision sorting of potatoes
CN109781730B (en) Method for quickly identifying chalky rice
JPH0415033B2 (en)
CN109211918A (en) A kind of fabric weft bow detection method based on weft yarn trend
CN109961432A (en) A kind of detection method and system of filter cloth breakage
Strachan Sea trials of a computer vision based fish species sorting and size grading machine
CN208288480U (en) A kind of tealeaves exterior quality self-grading device based on computer vision technique
Patel et al. Rapid assessment of some physical parameters of mangoes using monochrome computer vision
CN206331487U (en) A kind of agricultural product volume rapid measurement device based on machine vision
Steinmetz et al. Sorting cut roses with machine vision
JP7357203B2 (en) Surface texture detection method and surface texture detection device
CN111257339B (en) Preserved egg crack online detection method and detection device based on machine vision
García-Alegre et al. Color index analysis for automatic detection of eggshell defects
JPH06100536B2 (en) Nori discrimination method
JP3962525B2 (en) Image generation device and sorting classification determination device used for sorting agricultural products