JPH03290702A - Learning control system - Google Patents

Learning control system

Info

Publication number
JPH03290702A
JPH03290702A JP9277990A JP9277990A JPH03290702A JP H03290702 A JPH03290702 A JP H03290702A JP 9277990 A JP9277990 A JP 9277990A JP 9277990 A JP9277990 A JP 9277990A JP H03290702 A JPH03290702 A JP H03290702A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
controlled object
ramp
control
value
answer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP9277990A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2876702B2 (en
Inventor
Yuji Nakamura
裕司 中村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yaskawa Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Yaskawa Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yaskawa Electric Corp filed Critical Yaskawa Electric Corp
Priority to JP9277990A priority Critical patent/JP2876702B2/en
Publication of JPH03290702A publication Critical patent/JPH03290702A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2876702B2 publication Critical patent/JP2876702B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To obtain the step answer of a control subject with no direct measurement by sampling the ramp answer of the control subject and using the value obtained by dividing the differential value of the ramp answer by the slope of a ramp command as the step answer. CONSTITUTION:A step answer Hk is obtained as Hk = (Rk - Rk-1)/D based on the sample value Rk of the ramp answer obtained by sampling the step answer of a control subject. In this equation D shows the slope of a sampling interval set in a steady state of a ramp command or the ramp answer. Based on this step answer, a future control deviation is estimated and the control input is decided so that the estimated control deviation is minimized. Thus a follow-up control system having the high accuracy is obtained.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、繰り返し動作をする工作機械、ロボット等の
制御方式に関する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to a control system for machine tools, robots, etc. that perform repetitive operations.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

繰り返し目標値に対する学習制御系の設計法としては、
本出願人が先に出願した特開平1−237701号公報
において、提案した方式がある!この方式は、同じ目標
値に対する動作を繰り返し、過去の偏差をもとに未来の
偏差を予測し、その値が最小となるように制御入力を補
正していくというもので、最終的には目標値と出力が一
致す1+TS るため、高精度な追従動作が実現される。
As a design method for a learning control system for repeated target values,
There is a method proposed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 1-237701, which was previously filed by the present applicant! This method repeats the operation for the same target value, predicts the future deviation based on the past deviation, and corrects the control input so that the value becomes the minimum. Since the value and the output match (1+TS), highly accurate tracking operation is achieved.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problem to be solved by the invention]

上述の方式では、偏差の予測の際に制御対象のステップ
応答が必要であるが、ステップ応答の測定は、たとえば
NC工作機械などの場合、メカ系に負担がかかるため、
あまり好ましくない。
In the above method, the step response of the controlled object is required to predict the deviation, but measuring the step response places a burden on the mechanical system, for example in the case of an NC machine tool.
I don't like it very much.

そこで本発明は、制御対象のステップ応答を直接測定せ
ず求めてやることを目的とする。
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to obtain the step response of a controlled object without directly measuring it.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means to solve the problem]

上記問題を解決するため、本願の第1の発明は、同じパ
ターンを級り逼す目標値に制御対象の出力を一致させる
よう試行を繰り返し、各試行の中で制御対象のステップ
応答を利用して未来の制御偏差を予測し、その予測値が
最小となるよう制御入力を決定する制御系において、 前記制御対象のランプ応答をサンプリングし、その差分
値をランプ指令の傾きで除した値をステップ応答として
用いることを特徴とするものである。
In order to solve the above problem, the first invention of the present application repeats trials to match the output of the controlled object to a target value that matches the same pattern, and uses the step response of the controlled object in each trial. In a control system that predicts the future control deviation based on the predicted value and determines the control input so that the predicted value is minimized, the ramp response of the controlled object is sampled, and the difference value divided by the slope of the ramp command is calculated as a step value. It is characterized by being used as a response.

本願の第2の発明は、同じパターンを繰り返す目標値に
制御対象の出力を一致させるよう試行を繰り返し、各試
行の中で制御対象のステップ応答を利用して未来の制御
偏差を予測し、その予測値が最小となるよう制御入力を
決定する制御系において、 ランプ指令の人力時刻から制御対象の出力が立上がり始
めるまでの時間をむだ時間tdとみなし、定常偏差値E
とランプ指令の傾きDから時定数TをT=E/D によって算出し、 上記伝達関数によるシミュレーションによって、ステッ
プ応答を求めることを特徴とするものである。
The second invention of the present application repeats trials to match the output of the controlled object to a target value that repeats the same pattern, and predicts future control deviation using the step response of the controlled object during each trial. In a control system that determines the control input so that the predicted value is minimized, the time from the manual power time of the lamp command until the output of the controlled object starts to rise is regarded as the dead time td, and the steady-state deviation value E
The time constant T is calculated from the slope D of the ramp command by T=E/D, and the step response is determined by simulation using the above transfer function.

〔作 用〕[For production]

本発明では、メカ系に対してあまり負担のかからないラ
ンプ応答を測定し、その結果からステップ応答が算出さ
れる。
In the present invention, a ramp response that does not place much burden on the mechanical system is measured, and a step response is calculated from the result.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

以下、学習制御則として特開平1−237701号公報
の第1の発明の方式を採用し、その際のステップ応答の
算出法として本発明を用いた場合の具体的実施例を第1
図に示して説明する。
Hereinafter, a specific example will be described in which the method of the first invention of JP-A-1-237701 is adopted as the learning control law and the present invention is used as the step response calculation method.
This will be explained with reference to the diagram.

本願の第1の発明の具体的実施例を第11!lに示す。The 11th concrete embodiment of the first invention of the present application! Shown in l.

図中1は指令発生器であり、現在時刻11.:おける目
標値r (i)を発生する。2は減算器であり、偏差e
 (i)を求め記憶するために用いる。3は、定数Q+
、 ql・・・・・・、q、、Q、g++・・・・・・
+g*−+のメモリ、4は現在時刻1及び過去1周期分
の偏差e(i)(j=i、 i−1,・・・・・・、 
i’ +1. i’ )のメモリである。ただし、i’
=i−1とする。
1 in the figure is a command generator, and the current time 11. : Generate the target value r (i) at . 2 is a subtractor, and the deviation e
It is used to find and memorize (i). 3 is constant Q+
, ql..., q,, Q, g++...
+g*-+ memory, 4 is the deviation e(i) for the current time 1 and the past one cycle (j=i, i-1, ......,
i'+1. i') memory. However, i'
=i-1.

また、5は1サンプリング前の時刻よりN−1回前の時
刻までの増分修正量a(j)N=i−1゜1−2.・・
・・・・、i−N+1)のメモリであり、6は1サンプ
リング前の時刻より1周期前までの制御人力u(j)(
j=i−1,i−2,・・・・・・、i’+1゜i’)
のメモリである。
Further, 5 is the incremental correction amount a(j) from the time one sampling before to the time N-1 times before N=i-1°1-2.・・・
..., i-N+1), and 6 is the memory for the control human power u(j)(
j=i-1, i-2,..., i'+1゜i')
memory.

また、7は演算器であり、 a(0=Σqie(i’十K) 十Q (e (i) 
−e (i’))−Σgイ a(i−n)    ・・
・・・・・・・・・(1)なる演算によって、今回の増
分修正量a (i)を算出する。
In addition, 7 is an arithmetic unit, a(0=Σqie(i'10K) 0Q (e (i)
-e (i')) -ΣgI a(i-n) ・・
The current incremental correction amount a (i) is calculated by the calculation (1).

8は積算器で、今回の修正量Σa(」)を算出する。8 is an integrator that calculates the current correction amount Σa('').

J=1゜ 9は加算器であり、1周期前の時刻における制御人力u
(io〉と今回の修正量Σa (j)とを加算し」:1
0 で、今回の制御人力u(1)を出力する。制御開始時に
は、u (i−)=O,a (i、)=0とする。
J=1゜9 is an adder, and the control human power u at the time one cycle before
(io> and the current correction amount Σa (j) are added: 1
0, the current control human power u(1) is output. At the start of control, u (i-)=O, a (i,)=0.

10、 11はサンプリング周期Tで閉じるサンプラで
あり、12はホールド回路である。
10 and 11 are samplers that close at the sampling period T, and 12 is a hold circuit.

13は制御対象であり、入力はu (t)で、出力であ
る被制御量はx (t)である。
13 is a controlled object, the input is u (t), and the controlled quantity which is the output is x (t).

2〜12は制御系において、通常コントローラと呼ばれ
る部分であるが、汎用のディジタル回路あルイハマイク
ロコンピュータによって簡単に実現できる。また、制御
対象の13の中にすでに何らかの制御系(補償器等〉が
含まれていても構わない。
In the control system, 2 to 12 are parts usually called controllers, which can be easily realized using general-purpose digital circuits or microcomputers. Moreover, it does not matter if some kind of control system (compensator, etc.) is already included in the 13 objects to be controlled.

ここで、(1)式の定数Q L Q、  g−は次式で
与え次に第2の方法では、制御対象13の伝達関数をら
れる。
Here, the constants Q L Q, g- in equation (1) are given by the following equation. Next, in the second method, the transfer function of the controlled object 13 is calculated.

1+TS 時刻から制御対象の出力Xが立上がり始めるまでの時間
をむだ時間tdとみなし、定常偏差値Eとランプ指令の
傾きDから、時定数Tを T=E/D によって演算する。
The time from the 1+TS time until the output X of the controlled object starts to rise is regarded as the dead time td, and the time constant T is calculated from the steady-state deviation value E and the slope D of the ramp command as T=E/D.

上式のHkは制御対象13のステップ応答のサンプル値
(JJ2図)であるが、実際には傾きDのランプ応答を
サンプリングしく第31!I)ステップ応答に換算して
やる方法を2通り示す。
Hk in the above equation is the sample value of the step response of the controlled object 13 (Fig. JJ2), but in reality, the ramp response of the slope D is sampled. I) We will show you two ways to convert it into a step response.

まず、第1の方法では、サンプリングしたランプ応答の
サンプル値Rkより、次式 %式%) によってステップ応答Hkを求めてやる。ここでDは、
ランプ指令あるいはランプ応答の定常状態でのサンプリ
ング間隔における傾きである。
First, in the first method, the step response Hk is calculated from the sample value Rk of the sampled lamp response using the following formula. Here, D is
It is the slope of the steady state sampling interval of the lamp command or lamp response.

ステップ応答のシミュレーションを行いHk ヲ求めて
やる。
We will simulate the step response and find Hk.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

以上のように、本発明によれば、制御対象のランプ応答
を測定し、メカ系に負担をかけることなく制御対象の動
特性等の情報を得、それをもとに学習制御によって制御
入力を決定するため非常に精度の良い追従制御系を実現
することができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, the ramp response of the controlled object is measured, information such as the dynamic characteristics of the controlled object is obtained without placing a burden on the mechanical system, and control input is performed using learning control based on the information. Therefore, it is possible to realize a highly accurate tracking control system.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明の実施例、第2図、第3図は本発明の動
作説明図である。 l・・・指令発生器 2・・・減算器 3・・・定数のメモリ 4・・・過去1周期分の偏差のメモリ 5・・・過去の増分修正量のメモリ 6・・・過去の制御入力のメモリ 7・・・演算器 8・・・積算器 9・・・加算器 10、11・・・サンプラ 12・・・ホールド回路 13・・・制御対象 第2 図 特許出願人 株式会社 安用電機躯作所代表者  菊 
池   功 d
FIG. 1 is an embodiment of the present invention, and FIGS. 2 and 3 are explanatory diagrams of the operation of the present invention. l...Command generator 2...Subtractor 3...Constant memory 4...Deviation memory for the past one cycle 5...Past incremental correction amount memory 6...Past control Input memory 7...Arithmetic unit 8...Integrator 9...Adder 10, 11...Sampler 12...Hold circuit 13...Controlled object Figure 2 Patent applicant Yasuyo Co., Ltd. Kiku, Representative of Denki Building Works
Ike Isao d

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] (1)同じパターンを繰り返す目標値に制御対象の出力
を一致させるよう試行を繰り返し、各試行の中で制御対
象のステップ応答を利用して未来の制御偏差を予測し、
その予測値が最小となるよう制御入力を決定する制御系
において、 前記制御対象のランプ応答をサンプリングし、その差分
値をランプ指令の傾きで除した値をステップ応答として
用いることを特徴とする学習制御方式。
(1) Repeat trials to match the output of the controlled object to the target value that repeats the same pattern, and use the step response of the controlled object in each trial to predict future control deviation,
In a control system that determines a control input so that its predicted value is minimized, the learning is characterized in that the ramp response of the controlled object is sampled, and a value obtained by dividing the difference value by the slope of the ramp command is used as the step response. control method.
(2)同じパターンを繰り返す目標値に制御対象の出力
を一致させるよう試行を繰り返し、各試行の中で制御対
象のステップ応答を利用して未来の制御偏差を予測し、
その予測値が最小となるよう制御入力を決定する制御系
において、 前記制御対象のランプ応答をサンプリングし、制御対象
の伝達関数を(e^−^t^d^■)/(1+TS)と
仮定し、ランプ指令の入力時刻から制御対象の出力が立
上がり始めるまでの時間をむだ時間tdとみなし、定常
偏差値Eとランプ指令の傾きDから時定数TをT=E/
D によって算出し、 上記伝達関数によるシミュレーションによって、ステッ
プ応答を求めることを特徴とする学習制御方式。
(2) Repeat trials to match the output of the controlled object to the target value that repeats the same pattern, and use the step response of the controlled object in each trial to predict future control deviation;
In a control system that determines the control input so that the predicted value is minimized, the ramp response of the controlled object is sampled, and the transfer function of the controlled object is assumed to be (e^-^t^d^■)/(1+TS). The time from the input time of the ramp command until the output of the controlled object starts to rise is regarded as the dead time td, and the time constant T is calculated from the steady-state deviation value E and the slope D of the ramp command as T=E/
A learning control method characterized in that the step response is calculated by D and is obtained by simulation using the transfer function.
JP9277990A 1990-04-06 1990-04-06 Learning control method Expired - Fee Related JP2876702B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9277990A JP2876702B2 (en) 1990-04-06 1990-04-06 Learning control method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP9277990A JP2876702B2 (en) 1990-04-06 1990-04-06 Learning control method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH03290702A true JPH03290702A (en) 1991-12-20
JP2876702B2 JP2876702B2 (en) 1999-03-31

Family

ID=14063910

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP9277990A Expired - Fee Related JP2876702B2 (en) 1990-04-06 1990-04-06 Learning control method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2876702B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2876702B2 (en) 1999-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR970003823B1 (en) Control system that best follows periodical setpoint value
Yu et al. Fractional order modeling and control for permanent magnet synchronous motor velocity servo system
KR840001873A (en) Point-Specific Method for Preset Robots
Copot et al. A fractional order control strategy for visual servoing systems
JPH0728508A (en) Predictive controller
Eaton et al. Power series approximation to solutions of nonlinear systems of differential equations
JPS61248104A (en) Manipulator controlling device
JPH03290702A (en) Learning control system
Oprzedkiewcz et al. The PLC implementation of fractional-order operator using CFE approximation
JPH01237701A (en) Control system to optimumly follow periodical target value
JP2541163B2 (en) A control method that optimally follows the periodic target value.
Edwards et al. Robust nonlinear control of heating plant
JP2921056B2 (en) Learning control device by correcting speed command
JPH04369002A (en) Predictive learning control system based upon approximate step response
JP3109605B2 (en) Learning control method
Prado et al. Motion Control with FPGA
Soria et al. Low cost closed loop identification of a DC motor
JP3039814B2 (en) Learning control method
JP3039573B2 (en) Learning control method
JP3191836B2 (en) Learning control device
Akin et al. A new fuzzy controller based on an integrator algorithm for stator flux estimation in induction motors
Li et al. Disturbance prediction based active disturbance rejection control approach
SU1316013A1 (en) Device for simulating rectifier converters
Deraz et al. An Interior Point Algorithm for Parameter Estimation of a Geared PMDC Motor Using Current and Speed Step Responses
JP2002258904A (en) Feedback control method for non-linear controlled object

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090122

Year of fee payment: 10

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees