JPH01241589A - Driving training simulator - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE:To save instructor's labor by deciding whether training results of a trainee are correct or not according to normal training results, controlling the result as a chart, and analyzing the training results of the trainee statistically. CONSTITUTION:A training result processing means 7 which decides whether or not the training results are correct and generates the trainee chart, a trainee chart storage part 8 which stores the trainee chart, and a normal training result storage part 9 which stores the normal training results so as to control the training results of the trainee as the chart. Then information used to generate the chart of the trainee is obtained from a training result storage part 6 where the training results are stored for a back-track and a replay function. Therefore, the training results of the trainee can be controlled by the driving training simulator, so paper control by an instructor is not necessary. Consequently, the control over the training results of the trainee by the instructor is almost automated and the instructor's labor is saved.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Object of the Invention] (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention relates to a simulator for driving training.

(Conventional technology) Driving training simulators are currently used in all departments.
It has been developed and introduced. As is well known, operation training simulators were developed to effectively train plant operation and maintenance personnel. The machine, electrical system, pressure oil system, etc. are simulated at the same time as the actual machine, and displayed on a monitoring panel, operation panel, or CRT similar to the actual machine. or.

The structure allows instructors to operate the system in situations that are difficult to implement in practice and in abnormal conditions that occur infrequently, allowing training not only in normal operation but also in maintenance and accident response.

In addition, there is an initial state setting function that allows you to set the plant state that suits your purpose at the start of training, a backtrack function that returns the current simulation state to the simulation state at any point in the past, and a backtrack function that allows you to set the current simulation state to any point in the past. It has a play function that allows you to return to the simulation state and reproduce the driving state from that point to the current point.

Figure 5 is a configuration diagram of a conventional driving training simulator.
Instructor, driving training simulator.

The structure is such that all trainees work together to proceed with the training.

First, as an example of the operation of the driving training simulator, a starting operation from a stopped state of the main engine will be described.

The instructor uses the dialogue unit 1 to send a plant state setting change request a for setting the main engine stoppage status to 1m to the plant state setting change means 2. Set in the characteristic simulation section 3.

The plant state C in which the main engine is stopped, which is simulated by the mathematical formula of the plant characteristics simulating section 3 or the simulated hard high-rise, etc., is displayed on the plant state display section 4 such as a monitoring panel or CRT similar to the actual plant.
will be displayed and provided to the trainee.

The trainee performs a plant startup operation based on the state of the plant status display section 4 using the SW on the operation panel or the plant operation section 5 such as a CRT.The plant operation section 5 uses the trainee operation information d to simulate plant characteristics. Notify Department 3. As a result, plant characteristics are simulated for the trainee's plant startup operation.

Next, we will explain how accidents and failures occur.

During the start-up operation as described above, the instructor uses the dialogue section 1 to issue a request a to the plant state setting change means 2 to change the plant state setting of the valve opening, for example, in order to cause a valve opening failure. The plant state setting change means 2 sets plant state setting change information, which is information about the valve opening, in the plant characteristic simulating section 3, and locks the valve. The influence of the valve opening is simulated in the plant characteristic simulating section 3, and the brand condition C affected by the influence is displayed on the plant condition display section 4.

The trainee notices an abnormal state in the plant and investigates the cause. After determining the cause, the trainee uses the plant operation unit 5 to take countermeasures, such as operating a valve in another system to prevent a plant trip, etc. .

The plant operation unit 5 notifies the plant characteristic simulation unit 3 of the trainee operation information d, which is the corresponding action.

This simulates plant characteristics for countermeasures against valve ivy accidents.

Next, we will explain the backtrack and replay movements.

In the above-mentioned operation training, the plant state setting change information from the instructor, the plant state C1 from the plant characteristic simulation unit 3, and the trainee operation information d from the trainee are requested by the instructor, and the trainee operation information 2 is fixed periodic. For example, the training result information 201 in FIG.
It is saved in chronological order and used as reproduction data for the backtrack replay function.

Backtrack replay request from instructor is 1
Using the communication unit 1, a plant state reproduction request i is issued to the training result storage unit 6 as, for example, a request to reproduce a simulation state 10 minutes before the current simulation state. The training result storage section 6 sets the plant state 10 minutes ago from the current time in the plant characteristic simulating section 3 as plant state reproduction information j. As a result, the plant status C from 10 minutes ago is displayed on the plant status display section 4.

This is the function of backtracking. In addition, the replay function replays the instructor's plant state setting change information and training operation information from the simulation time returned 10 minutes ago by the backtrack function to the present time from the training result storage unit 6 toward the current time. The settings are made in the plant characteristic simulating section 3 in series order, so that the plant characteristic simulating section 3 simulates the plant state C from the past 10 minutes to the present, and reproduces and displays it on the plant state display section 4. .

Nowadays, when fully automated plants have become mainstream, operator training simulators with the above-mentioned features are used by many trainees of various levels because they can provide safe and effective operation training that cannot be experienced with real machines. Training is conducted under the supervision of an instructor.

(Problem to be solved by the invention) However, the only thing that manages the training results of these many different levels of trainees is paper management by instructors, such as trainee management sheets, and the analysis and analysis of training results. The selection of review items for training, etc. is determined by the instructor from the training management sheet, which is a burden to the instructor during training and a loss in training efficiency.

[Structure of the invention]

(Means for Solving the Problem) The configuration of the present invention for solving this object will be explained using FIG. 1.

In the present invention, in order to manage the training results of the trainee as a medical record, the conventional configuration includes a training result processing means 7 for determining whether the training result is correct or not and creating a trainee's medical record, and a training result processing means 7 for storing the trainee's medical record. A medical record storage section 8 and a normal training result storage section 9 for storing normal training results are provided. Note that information for creating a medical record of the trainee is obtained from the training result storage section 6 that stores training results for backtracking and replay functions.

(Function) Accordingly, in the present invention, the training results of the trainee are managed by a driving training simulator, and the training results are determined to be correct or not, and the characteristics, analysis, and statistics of the trainee are performed using the driving training simulator.
This will save the instructor's labor.

(Example) First, it is a configuration diagram of the present invention for management of trainee medical records. 1st
This will be explained using figures.

In order to save the training results stored in the training result storage unit 6 as a medical record, the instructor issues a training result processing request e to the training result processing means 7 to create a trainee medical record using the dialogue unit 1. The training result processing means 7 retrieves the training result information f from the training result storage unit 6, and in order to judge the training result, retrieves the initial state number, Normal training result information is retrieved using the accident/failure number and operation mode such as start/stop as keys.

Here, the normal training result information f1 stored in the normal training result storage section 9 will be described.

Normal training results for training items are stored in the normal training result storage section 9. This is when the simulator is introduced.
Normal training was carried out using the driving training simulator of the present invention, and the results were registered in the normal training result storage section 9. The registration method is to perform a normal operation corresponding to a training item and store the result in the training result storage unit 6.

Furthermore, a request to save normal training results is outputted to the training result storage section 6 using the dialog section 1, and the normal training result information is stored in the initial state number, accident/failure number, operation mode such as start/stop, etc. It is registered in the normal training result storage unit 9 as follows.

Depending on the training, there may be no problem with the sequence even if the order of operating the operation switches is reversed, or there may be a timer between the operation switches and the operations must be performed within a specified time. There is.

In order to provide the logic conditions and time elements of such operation SW to the normal training result information f in the normal training result storage section 9,
The instructor receives normal training result information f4 from the dialogue section 1.
A training result processing request e is sent to the training result processing means 7 for example, keys such as training items and initial state numbers. The training result processing means 7 extracts normal training result information f4 for operation mode keys such as initial state number, accident/failure number, and start/stop from the normal training result storage section 9 and displays it on the dialog section 1. The instructor additionally corrects the logic conditions and time elements to the normal training result information f1 displayed on the dialog section 1. The normal training result information f, to which the logic conditions and time elements have been added such as 0 or more, is the training result. The result is stored in the normal training result storage section 9 via the result processing means 7.

Next, the training result processing means 7 determines the trainee's erroneous operation on the training item from the training result information f and normal training result information f, and creates a medical record of the trainee. The created medical record is stored in the trainee medical record storage unit 8 as trainee medical record information g, such as the trainee name, training date and time, training items, training results correct or incorrect, and details of erroneous operations. According to the request, the dialog section 1 can be used to retrieve the information as follows, for example.

The instructor uses the dialog unit 1 to request the training result processing means 7 for a training result processing request e such as the trainee group and extraction conditions. The training result processing means 7 retrieves the trainee medical record information g corresponding to the request content of the training result processing request e from the trainee medical record storage unit 8 and displays it on the dialog unit 1. As described above, the driving training simulator of the present invention creates, stores, displays, and manages trainee medical records.

Here, one embodiment of the format of a trainee's chart and the determination of whether the training result is correct or incorrect according to the present invention will be described.

FIG. 2 is an example of a trainee's chart created using the driving training simulator of the present invention. The trainee's medical record includes personal information 101, which is the trainee's information such as the trainee's name, gender, 9 years of age, business name, etc., and the training results of the trainee are categorized by initial state, and the training is judged to be successful or not. The result history information 102 is, for example, the date of training.

The name of the initial state setting performed at the beginning of the training, the name of the accident/failure simulation if an accident/failure occurs, the success/failure judgment results of the plant operation and failure response operation during the training, the operation data during the training, etc. be.

FIG. 3 is an example of a method for determining whether a training result is correct or incorrect using the driving training simulator of the present invention. Judgment as to whether the training results are correct or not is made by classifying the training result information 201 into each initial state setting and each accident/failure, and comparing it with the normal training result information of the corresponding classification in the normal training result information 202. Third
In the figure, a comparison is made between the trainee operation information after setting the initial state A in the training result information 201 and the starting training operation for the initial state A in the normal training result information 202, and the training result information 2
The trainee's operation information after the accident/failure A in 01 is compared with the corresponding operation for the accident/failure A in the normal training result information 202 for each operation, and the trainee's operation error or insufficient operation is determined. is determined and reflected in the trainee's medical record.

The fourth example is an example of a normal training result information correction screen diagram for providing normal training result information with operation conditions of the operating SW and timer conditions by the instructor.

Normal training result information is as shown in the operation curve in Figure 4.

This is information that stores time-series changes in the status of the operation SWI. Here, if there is no problem in the sequence whether the operation SWI or the operation SW2 is performed first, there is no order condition, so for example N5 (NOT 5
ial).

Further, if there is a prescribed time of 3 minutes between the operation SW4 and the operation SW5, it is expressed as 3 minutes in the timer list.

As mentioned above, since the normal training result information can be modified by adding conditions and timer information by the instructor, it is possible to determine whether the training result is correct or not.For example, the operation performed by Trainer A and the operation performed by Trainee B are different. However, it is possible to determine that both are correct.

The series of training curriculum has now been completed, and the training results of the trainee have been stored in the training result storage section 6. The instructor uses the dialog unit 1 to create a trainee's training result as a trainee's medical record, and sends a training result processing request e to the training result processing means 7 for creating the medical record.

The training result processing means 7 retrieves one item of training, that is, training result information f from the initial state setting to the next initial state setting, from the training result storage unit 6, and converts normal training result information f1 corresponding to the initial state into normal training. The result is retrieved from the result storage section 9. Next, the training result processing means 7 compares the training result information f and the normal training result information f4, for example, performs the operation order timer conditions of the operation sw, etc., and detects errors in plant operation by the trainee, insufficient plant operation, etc. Check as shown.

The checked results are created as one of the training result history information 102 in the trainee's chart shown in FIG.

As described above, the training results are created as a trainee's medical record and stored in the trainee's medical record storage section 8.

The dialogue unit 1 requests the trainee processing means 7 to retrieve the trainee's name and the trainee's medical record retrieval conditions, such as the training result pressure/failure of accident response training, as a trainee medical record processing request e. The training result processing means 7 restores the training results of, for example, accident response training from the trainee medical record storage unit 8 in accordance with the trainee medical record retrieval conditions, and displays them on the dialogue unit 1 as trainee medical record information g. Part 1
Look at the training results of the accident response training displayed on the page, identify the weaknesses of the trainees, such as weakness in responding to electrical accidents, and give advice on those weak points.
Do a review.

As described above, the instructor can manage and analyze the training results in parallel with the training by using the driving training simulator. If the training items are used as a certification test for driving training, the trainee's medical record will be the results of the driving training test. Points are assigned to each training item in advance, and after the training is completed, scores are assigned to the trainee's medical record according to the points assigned and output to a typewriter or the like.

This makes it possible to manage certification tests using a driving training simulator.

〔Effect of the invention〕

As described above, according to the present invention, since the training results of the trainee are managed by the driving training simulator, the instructor's paper management becomes unnecessary. Furthermore, since the training results can be automatically determined and saved as the trainee's medical record, analysis and statistics on the training results of the trainee can be performed using the driving training simulator.

As a result, the instructor's management of the training results for the trainees is largely automated, and the instructor's labor can be saved.

Furthermore, since trainees can view their own training results as a medical record, they can also utilize the system for self-diagnosis and desk exercises even after training.

[Brief explanation of the drawing]

Figure 1 is a configuration diagram of the driving training simulator of the present invention, Figure 2
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of an embodiment of the trainee chart of the present invention, FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of an embodiment of the method of determining whether training result information is correct or incorrect from normal training result information, and FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of an embodiment of the training result information of the present invention. FIG. 5, which is an explanatory diagram of one embodiment of the normal training result information correction screen, is a configuration diagram of a conventional driving training simulator. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1... Dialogue part 2... Plant state change means 3... Plant characteristic simulation part 4... Plant state display part 5... Plant operation part 6... Training result storage part 7... Training Result processing means 8... Trainee medical record storage unit 9... Normal training result storage unit Agent Patent attorney Nori Chika Ken Yudo Daishimaru Kenkin (Saino Karu 1 Figure 4)

Claims (1)

[Claims] In an operation training simulator that simulates plant conditions and allows trainees to learn the correct way to operate a plant, there is an interaction section that accepts requests from the instructor and provides information to the instructor, and a dialog section that accepts requests from the instructor and provides information to the instructor. a plant characteristic simulating section that faithfully simulates the characteristics of the plant; a plant status display section that displays the plant status to the trainee; a plant operating section that accepts operations from the trainee; a training result storage section for storing, a normal training result storage section for storing normal training results, a training result processing means for determining whether the training results are correct or not and processing them as a trainee's chart, and a trainer for storing the trainee's chart. A driving training simulator comprising a medical record storage unit, capable of determining the training results of the trainee as normal training results, managing the results as a medical record, and performing analysis and statistics on the training results of the trainee. .