JPH01214735A - Evaluating method of contact resistance - Google Patents

Evaluating method of contact resistance

Info

Publication number
JPH01214735A
JPH01214735A JP4017388A JP4017388A JPH01214735A JP H01214735 A JPH01214735 A JP H01214735A JP 4017388 A JP4017388 A JP 4017388A JP 4017388 A JP4017388 A JP 4017388A JP H01214735 A JPH01214735 A JP H01214735A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
disk
slider
contact
magnetic disk
head
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP4017388A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiroshi Kataoka
浩 片岡
Yoshihiko Miyake
三宅 芳彦
Toshinori Kazama
風間 利紀
Teruyoshi Higashiya
輝義 東谷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP4017388A priority Critical patent/JPH01214735A/en
Publication of JPH01214735A publication Critical patent/JPH01214735A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PURPOSE:To enable the selection of combination of a head having a high contact resistance with a magnetic disk, by a method wherein, after the magnetic disk is rotated, a spherical slider is vibrated vertically and the disk and the spherical slider are brought into contact with each other periodically. CONSTITUTION:A spherical slider 4, which is fitted to the fore end of a vibrating rod 7 through the intermediary of a gimbal support spring 5, is so constructed that it is vibrated forcedly in the vertical direction by vibrating the vibrating rod 7 at a prescribed period by a vibrator 6, so that a periodical contact thereof with a magnetic disk 1 may occur. On the occasion when evaluation of a head/the disk is executed, a carriage 9 is moved to position the slider 4 at a prescribed position on the surface of the disk 1, and the disk 1 is rotated normally. Next, at a time point when the disk 1 gets to regular rotation, the slider 4 is vibrated at a prescribed period by the vibrator 6 and thereby the periodical contact with the disk 1 takes place. The fore end of the slider 4 is worn by the contact with the disk 1. The volume of a worn part in various test times is calculated, and the amount of wear of the slider 4 is obtained thereby.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は磁気ディスク装置におけるヘッド/ディスク接
触耐力評価方法に関し、特に接触耐力の高いヘッドとデ
ィスクの組合せ選定に好適な接触耐力評価方法に関する
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to a method for evaluating head/disk contact strength in a magnetic disk drive, and particularly to a contact strength evaluation method suitable for selecting a head/disk combination with high contact strength.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

磁気ディスク装はの高密度記録化を実現するため、ヘッ
ドとディスクの浮上間隙(浮上量)は狭小化の傾向にあ
る。これに伴ない、ヘッドとディスクの接触確率が高ま
り、ヘッドクラッシュの危険性が増大している。このよ
うな状況に鑑み、ヘッドとディスクが接触した場合にお
いても、耐クラツシユ性の高いヘッドとディスクの開発
が必要となっている。
In order to achieve high-density recording in magnetic disk drives, the flying gap (flying height) between the head and the disk tends to become narrower. Along with this, the probability of contact between the head and the disk increases, increasing the risk of head crash. In view of this situation, there is a need to develop heads and disks that are highly resistant to crushing even when the heads and disks come into contact with each other.

この開発に当たり考慮すべきことは、ヘッド材の耐摩耗
性が高くディスクの耐摩耗性が低い場合には、経時的に
ディスクが摩耗してクラッシュに至り易く、一方、ヘッ
ド材の耐摩耗性が低くディスクの耐摩耗性が高い場合に
は、経時的にヘッドが劣化して磁気記録素子を破壊する
懸念があることである。また、前述の如く、浮上型低下
に伴ないヘッドとディスクの連続接触の発生確率が上昇
し、クラッシュに至る可能性も大きい。
When developing this, it is important to consider that if the wear resistance of the head material is high and the wear resistance of the disk is low, the disk will easily wear out over time and lead to a crash. If the wear resistance of the disk is low and the wear resistance of the disk is high, there is a concern that the head will deteriorate over time and the magnetic recording element will be destroyed. Furthermore, as described above, as the flying type decreases, the probability of continuous contact between the head and the disk increases, and the possibility of a crash is also high.

従って、ヘッドとディスクのいずれか一方のみの耐摩耗
性が高くても意味がなく、ヘッドとディスクの両方が、
特定の組合せにおいて耐摩耗性が高くなるようにするこ
とが重要である。
Therefore, it is meaningless to have high wear resistance for either the head or the disk; both the head and disk have high wear resistance.
It is important to ensure that a particular combination has high wear resistance.

従来、公知の磁気ディスクの強度評価方法としては、公
開技報Nα86−076(1986年1月20日発行)
に開示されている方法がある。この方法は、磁気ディス
クを回転させ、該磁気ディスクの回転に同期させて加振
器により、実ヘッドを加振させ、強制的にヘッドとディ
スクを接触させて、磁気ディスクの強度評価を行うもの
である。
Conventionally, a known method for evaluating the strength of magnetic disks is disclosed in Technical Report Nα86-076 (published on January 20, 1986).
There is a method disclosed in This method evaluates the strength of the magnetic disk by rotating a magnetic disk, using a vibrator to vibrate the actual head in synchronization with the rotation of the magnetic disk, and forcing the head and disk into contact. It is.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problem to be solved by the invention]

上記従来技術は、実ヘッドをディスクと接触させて強度
評価を行う点から、装置稼動状態でのヘッドとディスク
の接触を模擬している点では有効であるが、上述の如き
、耐摩耗性が高くなるようなヘッドとディスクの特定の
組合せを選択するには、不充分なものであった。
The above-mentioned conventional technology is effective in that it simulates the contact between the head and the disk when the device is in operation, since the strength is evaluated by bringing the actual head into contact with the disk, but as mentioned above, the wear resistance is It was not sufficient to select a particular head/disk combination that would result in high performance.

本発明は上記事情に鑑みてなされたもので、その目的と
するところは、従来の磁気ディスク装置の接触耐力評価
方法における上述の如き問題を解消し、接触耐力の高い
ヘッドとディスクの組合せ選定に好適な接触耐力評価方
法を提供することにある。
The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and its purpose is to solve the above-mentioned problems in the conventional contact strength evaluation method for magnetic disk drives, and to facilitate the selection of head and disk combinations with high contact strength. The object of the present invention is to provide a suitable contact strength evaluation method.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means to solve the problem]

本発明の上記目的は、磁気ディスク媒体と、該磁気ディ
スク媒体上に位にする摺動子とを有する接触耐力評価機
構において、前記摺動子を球面摺動子とするとともに、
前記磁気ディスク媒体を回転させた後、加振器を用いて
前記球面摺動子を上下方向に振動させ、前記磁気ディス
ク媒体と前記球面摺動子とを、周期的に接触させること
を特徴とする接触耐力評価方法によって達成される。
The above object of the present invention is to provide a contact strength evaluation mechanism having a magnetic disk medium and a slider placed on the magnetic disk medium, in which the slider is a spherical slider, and
After rotating the magnetic disk medium, the spherical slider is vibrated in the vertical direction using a vibrator to periodically bring the magnetic disk medium and the spherical slider into contact with each other. This is achieved using a contact strength evaluation method.

〔作用〕[Effect]

本発明に係わる接触耐力評価方法においては、ヘッド/
ディスク接触エネルギを一定とした場合に、球面摺動子
の摩耗量を測定することにより、ヘッド材料の諸特性(
硬度、熱伝導率、質量等)がヘッド/ディスクに与える
損傷度を定量的に把握でき、また、ディスク面摩耗量を
測定することにより、ディスク表面構造(フィラー粒径
/含率、磁場配向方法、塗料混練方法または面粗さ等)
がヘッド/ディスクに与える損傷度を定量的に把握する
ことができる。
In the contact strength evaluation method according to the present invention, the head/
By measuring the amount of wear on the spherical slider when the disk contact energy is constant, various characteristics of the head material (
Hardness, thermal conductivity, mass, etc.) can quantitatively determine the degree of damage caused to the head/disk, and by measuring the amount of disk surface wear, the disk surface structure (filler particle size/content, magnetic field orientation method) can be quantitatively determined. , paint mixing method or surface roughness, etc.)
It is possible to quantitatively understand the degree of damage caused to the head/disk.

上述の1球面慴動子の摩耗量とディスク摩耗量とは、密
接に結び付いており、ヘッド材諸特性とディスク表面構
造とが相互に影響し合いながら、摩耗量が決定されるも
のである。
The amount of wear of the above-mentioned one-spherical rotor and the amount of disk wear are closely related, and the amount of wear is determined by the mutual influence of various characteristics of the head material and the surface structure of the disk.

なお、上の例では、ヘッド/ディスク接触エネルギを一
定とした場合について述べたが、本発明に係わる接触耐
力評価方法においては、加振力や加振周期またはディス
ク回転速度等、接触エネルギを変化させた場合にも、こ
れを含めて評価を行うことが可能である。
Although the above example describes the case where the head/disk contact energy is constant, in the contact strength evaluation method according to the present invention, the contact energy is changed by changing the excitation force, excitation period, disk rotation speed, etc. It is also possible to include this in the evaluation.

〔実施例〕〔Example〕

以下、本発明の実施例を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する
Embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings.

第2図は、ヘッド浮上状態の側面図である。磁気ディス
ク1を回転させることにより、磁気ヘッド2は磁気ディ
スク1の表面上を滑り始め、ある回転数に達すると、磁
気ディスク1の表面上を湿れ、浮上し始める。その後、
磁気ディスク1が高速定常回転に達すると、回転により
発生する空気流がヘッド2を押上げる力と、ジンバル支
持機構がヘッド2を押下げる力とがつり合い、ヘッドは
一定間隙を保持しつつ、磁気ディスク面上を浮上する。
FIG. 2 is a side view of the head in a floating state. By rotating the magnetic disk 1, the magnetic head 2 begins to slide on the surface of the magnetic disk 1, and when a certain number of rotations is reached, it wets the surface of the magnetic disk 1 and begins to float. after that,
When the magnetic disk 1 reaches high-speed steady rotation, the force of the airflow generated by the rotation pushing up the head 2 is balanced by the force of the gimbal support mechanism pushing down the head 2, and the head maintains a constant gap while maintaining the magnetic field. It levitates above the disk surface.

ここで、ディスクランナウト、ジンバル振動等の外乱要
因が加わると、ヘッドとディスクの間に接触が発生する
Here, when disturbance factors such as disk runout and gimbal vibration are added, contact occurs between the head and the disk.

第1図は、本発明に係わる接触耐力評価方法を実施する
ための装置の構成例を示す図である。図において、1は
上記磁気ディスク、3は該磁気ディスク1の回転方向、
4は球面摺動子を示している。上記球面摺動子4は、ジ
ンバル支持バネ5を介して加振棒7の先端に取付けられ
ており、この加振棒7を加振器6により一定周期で加振
させることにより、上記球面摺動子4を上下方向に強制
的に振動させて、磁気ディスク1との間に周期的な接触
を発生させる如く構成されている。なお、9はキャリッ
ジであり、矢印10で示す如く、往復動可能に構成され
ている。また、11は圧電素子であり、その出力はアン
プ12を介して、オシロスコープ13に表示される。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of an apparatus for implementing the contact strength evaluation method according to the present invention. In the figure, 1 is the magnetic disk, 3 is the rotation direction of the magnetic disk 1,
4 indicates a spherical slider. The spherical slider 4 is attached to the tip of an excitation rod 7 via a gimbal support spring 5, and the spherical slider 4 is attached to the tip of an excitation rod 7 through a gimbal support spring 5. The rotor 4 is configured to forcibly vibrate in the vertical direction to generate periodic contact with the magnetic disk 1. In addition, 9 is a carriage, and as shown by the arrow 10, it is comprised so that it can reciprocate. Further, 11 is a piezoelectric element, the output of which is displayed on an oscilloscope 13 via an amplifier 12.

本装匝により、ヘッド/ディスクの評価を行う際には、
まず、キャリッジ9を移動させて、球面摺動子4を磁気
ディスク1の面上の所定位置に位置付ける。次に、磁気
ディスク1を通常回転させる。この間、上記球面摺動子
4と磁気ディスク1との間には、一定間隙が保持される
。磁気ディスク1が定常回転数に達した時点で、球面摺
動子4を、前述の如く、加振器6により一定周期で加振
させる(矢印8で示す)ことにより、磁気ディスク1と
の間に周期的な接触を発生させる。
When evaluating heads/disks using this packaging,
First, the carriage 9 is moved to position the spherical slider 4 at a predetermined position on the surface of the magnetic disk 1. Next, the magnetic disk 1 is rotated normally. During this time, a constant gap is maintained between the spherical slider 4 and the magnetic disk 1. When the magnetic disk 1 reaches a steady rotational speed, the spherical slider 4 is vibrated at a constant period by the vibrator 6 (as shown by the arrow 8) as described above, so that the distance between the magnetic disk 1 and the magnetic disk 1 is increased. generate periodic contact.

以後、試験時間を定めて、種々の試験時間における接触
試験を行う。
Thereafter, test times are determined and contact tests are conducted at various test times.

第3図(a)は、試験前の球面慴動子4の拡大側面図で
あり、同(b)はその六方向から見た干渉縞図である。
FIG. 3(a) is an enlarged side view of the spherical surface element 4 before the test, and FIG. 3(b) is an interference fringe diagram as seen from six directions.

また、第4図(a)は、試験後の球面慴動子4の拡大側
面図であり、同(b、)はその六方向から見た干渉縞図
である。球面摺動子4の先端はディスクとの接触により
摩耗する。第4図(b)の斜線部Bが摩耗した部分であ
り、摩耗部分の体積を算出して球面摺動子4の摩耗量と
する。
Moreover, FIG. 4(a) is an enlarged side view of the spherical surface element 4 after the test, and FIG. 4(b) is an interference fringe diagram seen from six directions. The tip of the spherical slider 4 is worn out due to contact with the disk. The shaded area B in FIG. 4(b) is the worn part, and the volume of the worn part is calculated and used as the amount of wear of the spherical slider 4.

第5図(a)は、試験前の磁気ディスク1の表面を而粗
さ計によって測定した結果を示すものであり、同(b)
は、試験後の形状を示すものである。
FIG. 5(a) shows the results of measuring the surface of the magnetic disk 1 before the test using a roughness meter, and FIG. 5(b) shows the results of measuring the surface of the magnetic disk 1 before testing.
indicates the shape after the test.

斜線部Cが摩耗した部分であり、摩耗部分の体積を算出
して磁気ディスクの摩耗量とする。
The shaded area C is the worn part, and the volume of the worn part is calculated and used as the amount of wear of the magnetic disk.

第6図は、上記装置による評価結果の一例を示すもので
、横軸にディスク摩耗量、縦軸に摺動子摩耗量をとって
いる。摺動子とディスクの組合せにより、摺動子が摩耗
しにくくディスクが摩耗し易い場合(ケース■)、逆に
、ディスクが摩耗しにくく摺動子が摩耗し易い場合(ケ
ース■)、あるいは、両者が比例的に摩耗する場合(ケ
ース■)がある。従って、これから、互いに摩耗しにく
いヘッドとディスクの組合せが選定可能である。
FIG. 6 shows an example of the evaluation results obtained by the above-mentioned apparatus, in which the horizontal axis represents the disk wear amount, and the vertical axis represents the slider wear amount. Due to the combination of slider and disk, the slider is hard to wear and the disk is easy to wear (Case ■), conversely, the disk is hard to wear and the slider is easy to wear (Case ■), or There are cases where both wear out proportionally (case ■). Therefore, from this it is possible to select a combination of a head and a disk that are unlikely to wear each other.

上記実施例によれば、摺動子形状を球面としたことによ
り、試験開始時には、磁気ディスクとの接触状態を、常
に一定の状態からスタートさせることができ、また、解
析も容易になるという効果がある。
According to the above embodiment, by making the slider shape spherical, the contact state with the magnetic disk can always be started from a constant state at the start of the test, and analysis is also facilitated. There is.

なお、第1図に示した試験装置においては、加振棒7に
直接ジンバル支持バネ5を取付けて球面慴動子4を加振
したが、第7図に示す如く、ジンバル支持バネ5を取付
けるヘッドアーム14を直接加振するようにしても良い
。この方式の方が、より実機に近い振動パターンを実現
できる。
In the test apparatus shown in FIG. 1, the gimbal support spring 5 was attached directly to the excitation rod 7 to vibrate the spherical actuator 4, but as shown in FIG. The head arm 14 may be directly vibrated. This method can achieve a vibration pattern that is closer to the actual machine.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

以上述べた如く、本発明によれば、磁気ディスク媒体と
、該磁気ディスク媒体上に位置する摺動子とを有する接
触耐力評価機構において、前記慴動子を球面摺動子とす
るとともに、前記磁気ディスク媒体を回転させた後、加
振器を用いて前記球面摺動子を上下方向に振動させ、前
記磁気ディスク媒体と前記球面摺動子とを、周期的に接
触させ。
As described above, according to the present invention, in a contact strength evaluation mechanism having a magnetic disk medium and a slider located on the magnetic disk medium, the slider is a spherical slider, and the slider is a spherical slider. After rotating the magnetic disk medium, the spherical slider is vibrated in the vertical direction using a vibrator to bring the magnetic disk medium and the spherical slider into periodic contact.

るようにしたので、接触耐力の高いヘッドとディスクの
組合せ選定に好適な接触耐力評価方法を実現できるとい
う顕著な効果を奏するものである。
This has the remarkable effect of realizing a contact strength evaluation method suitable for selecting a combination of a head and a disk with high contact strength.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は本発明に係わる接触耐力評価方法を実施するた
めの装置の構成例を示す図、第2図はヘッド浮上状態の
側面図、第3図(、)は試験前の球面慴動子の拡大側面
図、同(b)はそのA方向から見た干渉縞図、第4図(
a)は試験後の球面摺動子の拡大側面図、同(b)はそ
の六方向から見た干渉縞図、第5図(a)は試験前の磁
気ディスクの表面を而粗さ計による測定結果を示す図、
同(b)は試験後の形状を示す図、第6図は評価結果の
一例を示すグラフ、第7図は本発明に係わる接触耐力評
価方法を実施するための装置の他の構成例を示す図であ
る。 1:磁気ディスク、2:磁気ヘッド、4:球面摺動子、
5ニシンパル支持バネ、6:加振器、7:加振棒、9:
キャリッジ、14:へラドアーム。 特許出願人 株式会社 日立製作所 ie、ワ 代理人弁理士磯村雅俊・:1、。 1 1′ 第   2   図 第   4   図 (a) 第   5   図 (a) 161          。 0   ディスク摩耗量(μm )
Fig. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of an apparatus for implementing the contact strength evaluation method according to the present invention, Fig. 2 is a side view of the head in a floating state, and Fig. 3 (,) is a spherical slider before testing. (b) is an interference fringe diagram as seen from direction A, and Fig. 4 (
(a) is an enlarged side view of the spherical slider after the test, (b) is an interference fringe diagram seen from six directions, and Figure 5 (a) is the surface of the magnetic disk before the test using a roughness meter. A diagram showing the measurement results,
6(b) is a diagram showing the shape after the test, FIG. 6 is a graph showing an example of the evaluation results, and FIG. 7 is a diagram showing another configuration example of the apparatus for carrying out the contact strength evaluation method according to the present invention. It is a diagram. 1: Magnetic disk, 2: Magnetic head, 4: Spherical slider,
5 Nishinpal support spring, 6: Vibrator, 7: Vibration rod, 9:
Carriage, 14: Herad arm. Patent applicant: Hitachi, Ltd. ie, Patent attorney: Masatoshi Isomura: 1. 1 1' Figure 2 Figure 4 (a) Figure 5 (a) 161. 0 Disc wear amount (μm)

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1、磁気ディスク媒体と、該磁気ディスク媒体上に位置
する摺動子とを有する接触耐力評価機構において、前記
摺動子を球面摺動子とするとともに、前記磁気ディスク
媒体を回転させた後、加振器を用いて前記球面摺動子を
上下方向に振動させ、前記磁気ディスク媒体と前記球面
摺動子とを、周期的に接触させることを特徴とする接触
耐力評価方法。
1. In a contact strength evaluation mechanism having a magnetic disk medium and a slider located on the magnetic disk medium, the slider is a spherical slider, and after rotating the magnetic disk medium, A contact strength evaluation method characterized in that the spherical slider is vibrated in the vertical direction using a vibrator to periodically bring the magnetic disk medium and the spherical slider into contact.
JP4017388A 1988-02-23 1988-02-23 Evaluating method of contact resistance Pending JPH01214735A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4017388A JPH01214735A (en) 1988-02-23 1988-02-23 Evaluating method of contact resistance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4017388A JPH01214735A (en) 1988-02-23 1988-02-23 Evaluating method of contact resistance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01214735A true JPH01214735A (en) 1989-08-29

Family

ID=12573377

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4017388A Pending JPH01214735A (en) 1988-02-23 1988-02-23 Evaluating method of contact resistance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH01214735A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5359879A (en) * 1992-11-04 1994-11-01 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Scanning micro-sclerometer
WO2019069888A1 (en) * 2017-10-03 2019-04-11 英二 草野 Sample holding stand

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5359879A (en) * 1992-11-04 1994-11-01 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Scanning micro-sclerometer
WO2019069888A1 (en) * 2017-10-03 2019-04-11 英二 草野 Sample holding stand

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3990091B2 (en) Magnetic head slider and magnetic disk device
US7130158B2 (en) Head arm of magnetic disk device
US7121133B2 (en) System, method, and apparatus for glide head calibration with enhanced PZT channel for very low qualification glide heights
JPH01214735A (en) Evaluating method of contact resistance
Xu et al. Modal testing and finite element modelling of subsystem in hard disk drive
US6185993B1 (en) Single sided sensor for glide height testing
US6662623B2 (en) Apparatus and method for glide height calibration of disk surfaces by use of dual-zone laser texture
US6623158B2 (en) Method and apparatus for thermal proximity imaging using pulsed energy
JP2001091445A (en) Scratch strength testing device and method thereof
JP4041925B2 (en) Method for evaluating swing characteristics of rolling bearing device
US5668690A (en) Method and apparatus for lifetime prediction of gas lubricated interfaces in data storage devices
JPS62132282A (en) Floating test method for floating type magnetic head
Zen et al. A force identification method for slider/disk contact force measurement
Wilson et al. Experimental modal analysis of a suspension assembly loaded on a rotating disk
JPH03158739A (en) Durability evaluating method for magnetic recording disk
JPH02198337A (en) Medium-surface evaluating apparatus
JP4258562B2 (en) Method for evaluating swing characteristics of rolling bearing device
JPH0367149A (en) Method for evaluating durability of magnetic disk
Kaymaram et al. Runout effects in the failure of thin film rigid magnetic recording disks
JPH0439882B2 (en)
JP2779520B2 (en) Measuring method of whirling amount of spindle of magnetic disk drive
JPH0191391A (en) Floating dust collecting method for magnetic disk device
JPH07134098A (en) Hard disc evaluation testing method
JPS63304481A (en) Magnetic disk device
JPS6037422B2 (en) Durability test method for sliding discs