JP7227042B2 - Evaluation method and evaluation device - Google Patents

Evaluation method and evaluation device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7227042B2
JP7227042B2 JP2019050332A JP2019050332A JP7227042B2 JP 7227042 B2 JP7227042 B2 JP 7227042B2 JP 2019050332 A JP2019050332 A JP 2019050332A JP 2019050332 A JP2019050332 A JP 2019050332A JP 7227042 B2 JP7227042 B2 JP 7227042B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
adhesion
volume
coal
volume ratio
heating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2019050332A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020153714A (en
Inventor
賢二郎 知恵
潤一 茂田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
IHI Inspection and Instrumentation Co Ltd
Original Assignee
IHI Inspection and Instrumentation Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by IHI Inspection and Instrumentation Co Ltd filed Critical IHI Inspection and Instrumentation Co Ltd
Priority to JP2019050332A priority Critical patent/JP7227042B2/en
Publication of JP2020153714A publication Critical patent/JP2020153714A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7227042B2 publication Critical patent/JP7227042B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は、評価方法及び評価装置に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an evaluation method and an evaluation device.

例えば、特許文献1には、石炭の燃焼灰の膠着度を測定することにより、伝熱管面付着性を評価する評価方法が開示されている。膠着度は、ラトラ試験機を用いて、焼結灰を回転させ、回転前の重量と回転後の重量とを比較することで求められる付着性の指標の一種である。このような特許文献1の伝熱管面付着性の評価方法は、一般に、瀝青炭に対して適用されている。 For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses an evaluation method for evaluating heat transfer tube surface adhesion by measuring the degree of adhesion of combustion ash of coal. The degree of adhesion is a type of index of adhesion obtained by rotating sintered ash using a rattra tester and comparing the weight before rotation and the weight after rotation. Such a method for evaluating heat transfer tube surface adhesion in Patent Document 1 is generally applied to bituminous coal.

特開2004-361368号公報Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-361368

ところで、現在、ボイラ等においては、燃料として亜瀝青炭を用いることが考えられている。亜瀝青炭は、瀝青炭と比較して水分が多く、燃焼灰の付着性が高い傾向があり、付着性について選定時に評価する必要がある。しかしながら、従来の付着性の評価方法は、複雑な手順や特殊な装置を用いる必要があり、燃焼灰の付着性が高い亜瀝青炭について、簡易に付着性を評価する方法が存在せず、亜瀝青炭の選定に時間や手間がかかる。 By the way, it is currently considered to use sub-bituminous coal as a fuel in boilers and the like. Compared to bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal has a higher moisture content and tends to have higher adhesion to combustion ash, so it is necessary to evaluate adhesion during selection. However, conventional adhesion evaluation methods require the use of complicated procedures and special equipment. It takes time and effort to select

本発明は、上述する問題点に鑑みてなされたもので、亜瀝青炭の付着性を容易に評価することを目的とする。 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the problems described above, and an object of the present invention is to easily evaluate the adhesion of sub-bituminous coal.

本発明は、上記課題を解決するための評価方法に係る第1の手段として、微粉炭を燃料として用いる微粉炭ボイラにおける燃焼灰の伝熱管面付着性を評価する評価方法であって、前記微粉炭が亜瀝青炭を含み、前記微粉炭の固形試料の加熱前の体積と、前記固形試料の加熱後の体積との相関に基づいて伝熱管面付着性を評価する、という構成を採用する。 The present invention, as a first means related to an evaluation method for solving the above problems, is an evaluation method for evaluating the adhesion of combustion ash to a heat transfer tube surface in a pulverized coal boiler using pulverized coal as fuel, wherein the fine powder A configuration is adopted in which the coal contains subbituminous coal, and the heat transfer tube surface adhesion is evaluated based on the correlation between the volume of the solid sample of pulverized coal before heating and the volume of the solid sample after heating.

評価方法に係る第2の手段として、上記第1の手段において、前記相関は、前記固形試料の前記加熱前の体積と前記固形試料の加熱後の体積との体積比率である、という構成を採用する。 As a second means related to the evaluation method, in the first means, the correlation is a volume ratio between the volume of the solid sample before heating and the volume of the solid sample after heating. do.

評価方法に係る第3の手段として、上記第2の手段において、前記体積比率を算出する体積比率算出工程と、前記体積比率に基づいて前記微粉炭の膠着度を推定する膠着度推定工程とを備える、という構成を採用する。 As a third means related to the evaluation method, in the second means, the volume ratio calculation step of calculating the volume ratio and the agglutination estimation step of estimating the agglutination of the pulverized coal based on the volume ratio Adopt the configuration of preparing.

評価方法に係る第4の手段として、上記第2または第3の手段において、前記体積比率が所定の範囲外の場合に、膠着度を計測する膠着度計測工程を備える、という構成を採用する。 As a fourth means relating to the evaluation method, in the second or third means, a configuration is adopted in which a stickiness measurement step is provided to measure the stickiness when the volume ratio is out of a predetermined range.

評価方法に係る第5の手段として、上記第1または2の手段において、前記相関が既知でありかつ伝熱管面付着性が既知の微粉炭である比較炭の前記相関と、評価対象の微粉炭の前記相関とを比較することにより、伝熱管面付着性を評価する、という構成を採用する。 As a fifth means related to the evaluation method, in the first or second means, the correlation of the comparative coal, which is a pulverized coal with a known correlation and a known heat transfer tube surface adhesion, and the pulverized coal to be evaluated. A configuration is adopted in which the adhesion to the heat transfer tube surface is evaluated by comparing with the correlation of .

評価装置に係る第1の手段として、微粉炭を燃料として用いる微粉炭ボイラにおける燃焼灰の伝熱管面付着性を評価する評価装置であって、前記微粉炭が亜瀝青炭を含み、前記微粉炭の固形試料の加熱前の体積と、前記固形試料の加熱後の体積との相関に基づいて伝熱管面付着性を評価する、という構成を採用する。 As a first means related to the evaluation device, an evaluation device for evaluating the adhesion of combustion ash to a heat transfer tube surface in a pulverized coal boiler using pulverized coal as a fuel, wherein the pulverized coal contains subbituminous coal, and the pulverized coal A configuration is adopted in which the adhesion to the heat transfer tube surface is evaluated based on the correlation between the volume of the solid sample before heating and the volume of the solid sample after heating.

本発明によれば、亜瀝青炭の固形試料について、加熱前と加熱後との体積の変化量に基づいて付着性を評価することが可能である。したがって、亜瀝青炭の選定時において、煩雑な試験や、専門的な装置を用いた試験を行うことなく、付着性を容易に評価可能である。 According to the present invention, it is possible to evaluate the adhesion of a solid sample of subbituminous coal based on the amount of change in volume between before and after heating. Therefore, when selecting sub-bituminous coal, it is possible to easily evaluate adhesion without conducting complicated tests or tests using specialized equipment.

本発明に係る体積比率及び膠着度の温度ごとの変化を示すグラフである。4 is a graph showing changes in volume ratio and degree of agglutination according to the present invention for each temperature. 本発明の第1実施形態に係る評価装置の機能構成を示すブロック図である。1 is a block diagram showing the functional configuration of an evaluation device according to a first embodiment of the present invention; FIG. 本発明の第1実施形態に係る評価方法を示すフローチャートである。It is a flow chart which shows the evaluation method concerning a 1st embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の第2実施形態に係る評価方法を示すフローチャートである。It is a flow chart which shows the evaluation method concerning a 2nd embodiment of the present invention.

以下、図面を参照して、本発明に係る評価方法の一実施形態について説明する。 An embodiment of the evaluation method according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

本発明に係る評価方法は、微粉炭を燃焼させる微粉炭ボイラにおいて、燃焼時に発生した燃焼灰のボイラ内伝熱管面への付着のしやすさ(伝熱管面付着性)を予備的に評価する。このような評価方法は、微粉炭の原料である亜瀝青炭の選定時の基準として用いられる。 In the evaluation method according to the present invention, in a pulverized coal boiler that burns pulverized coal, the ease of adhesion of combustion ash generated during combustion to the heat transfer tube surface in the boiler (heat transfer tube surface adhesion) is preliminarily evaluated. . Such an evaluation method is used as a criterion when selecting sub-bituminous coal, which is the raw material of pulverized coal.

まず、微粉炭の燃焼灰の付着性と、膠着度及び体積比率との相関について説明する。下表1は、付着性と膠着度と体積比率との相関を示す表である。 First, the correlation between the adherence of combustion ash of pulverized coal and the degree of stickiness and volume ratio will be described. Table 1 below is a table showing the correlation between adhesiveness, degree of agglutination and volume ratio.

Figure 0007227042000001
Figure 0007227042000001

付着性は、表1に示すように、一般的に4段階に分類される。最も付着性が小さいものがNotであり、実際のボイラにおいて、伝熱管面に付着することが少なく、粒子の細かいパウダー状の灰となる性質を有している。次に付着性が小さいものがLowであり、実際のボイラにおいて、伝熱管面に付着するものの、容易に剥落する性質を有している。次に付着性が小さいものがMediumであり、実際のボイラにおいて、伝熱管面に付着すると共に作業者の手で崩すことが可能な性質を有している。そして、最も付着性が大きいものがHighであり、実際のボイラにおいて、伝熱管面に付着すると除去が難しい性質を有している。このうち、ボイラの燃料として使用に適しているのは、付着性がMedium以下の微粉炭である。すなわち、付着性がHighの微粉炭は、ボイラの燃料として適していない。なお、微粉炭の灰は、燃焼温度が高くなるほどに付着性が上昇する傾向が見られる。 Adhesion is generally classified into four grades, as shown in Table 1. Not has the lowest adhesion, and in an actual boiler, it hardly adheres to the surface of heat transfer tubes and has the property of becoming powdery ash with fine particles. The next lowest adhesiveness is Low, and in an actual boiler, although it adheres to the heat transfer tube surface, it has the property of being easily peeled off. Medium has the next lowest adhesiveness, and in an actual boiler, it has a property that it adheres to the heat transfer tube surface and can be broken by an operator's hand. High is the one with the highest adhesiveness, and in an actual boiler, it has the property of being difficult to remove when it adheres to the heat transfer tube surface. Among these, pulverized coal with adhesion of medium or less is suitable for use as a boiler fuel. In other words, pulverized coal with High adhesion is not suitable as boiler fuel. Pulverized coal ash tends to increase in adhesion as the combustion temperature increases.

膠着度は、ラトラ試験を応用して焼結灰(石炭灰を一度所定の温度(1000,1050、1100、1150、1200℃など)で焼結して形成される試料)の固さを定量化した無次元数である。具体的には、焼結灰をラトラ試験機により回転し、ラトラ試験機に残留した焼結灰の重量を測定する。そして、回転後の焼結灰の残留重量を回転前の焼結灰の重量により除することで、膠着度が算出される。付着性は、特許第4244713号等に詳細に開示されているように、膠着度と相関性を有しており、回転後の焼結灰の残留重量が大きいほど高くなる。すなわち、膠着度は、値が大きいほど付着性が高く、値が小さいほど付着性が小さいことを示す指標である。このような膠着度は、例えば、0.2未満が付着性におけるNot、0.2~0.4が付着性におけるLow、0.4~0.8が付着性におけるMedium、0.8超過が付着性におけるHighと対応している。 Adhesion is applied to Ratra test to quantify the hardness of sintered ash (a sample formed by sintering coal ash at a predetermined temperature (1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200°C, etc.)). is a dimensionless number. Specifically, the sintered ash is rotated by a rattra tester, and the weight of the sintered ash remaining in the rattra tester is measured. Then, the degree of adhesion is calculated by dividing the residual weight of the sintered ash after rotation by the weight of the sintered ash before rotation. As disclosed in detail in Japanese Patent No. 4244713, etc., adhesion has a correlation with the degree of adhesion, and increases as the residual weight of the sintered ash after rotation increases. That is, the degree of agglutination is an index indicating that the larger the value, the higher the adhesion, and the smaller the value, the lower the adhesion. Such adhesion is, for example, less than 0.2 is Not in adhesion, 0.2 to 0.4 is Low in adhesion, 0.4 to 0.8 is Medium in adhesion, and more than 0.8 is Corresponds to High in adhesiveness.

体積比率(相関)は、焼結灰の加熱前の体積と加熱後の体積との比率を示しており、加熱後の体積が小さいほど値が小さくなる無次元数である。このような体積比率は、図1に示すように、温度が上昇するほど低下し、すなわち、膠着度が上昇するほど低下する傾向を示している。そして、膠着度が既知の複数の試料の体積比率の平均は、表1に示すように、膠着度0.2のときに0.98、膠着度0.4のときに0.96、膠着度0.6のときに0.94、膠着度0.8のときに0.91程度となる。すなわち、体積比率を測定することにより、膠着度の傾向を推定することが可能である。 The volume ratio (correlation) indicates the ratio between the volume of the sintered ash before heating and the volume after heating, and is a dimensionless number whose value decreases as the volume after heating decreases. As shown in FIG. 1, such a volume ratio tends to decrease as the temperature rises, that is, as the degree of adhesion increases. Then, as shown in Table 1, the average volume ratio of a plurality of samples with a known degree of agglutination is 0.98 when the degree of agglutination is 0.2, 0.96 when the degree of agglutination is 0.4, and When the degree of agglutination is 0.6, it becomes 0.94, and when the degree of agglutination is 0.8, it becomes approximately 0.91. That is, by measuring the volume ratio, it is possible to estimate the tendency of stickiness.

[第1実施形態]
続いて、本発明の第1実施形態に係る評価方法を実行する評価装置1について説明する。
評価装置1は、図2に示すように、画像認識部2と、体積算出部3と、体積比率算出部4と、膠着度推定部5と、付着性判定部6とを備えている。なお、評価装置1は、例えばコンピュータの一機能として実装されており、CPU、メモリ、記憶媒体、ディスプレイ及び入力装置等が連携されることにより機能する。
[First embodiment]
Next, the evaluation device 1 that executes the evaluation method according to the first embodiment of the present invention will be described.
The evaluation device 1 includes an image recognition unit 2, a volume calculation unit 3, a volume ratio calculation unit 4, an adhesion degree estimation unit 5, and an adhesion determination unit 6, as shown in FIG. Note that the evaluation device 1 is implemented as one function of a computer, for example, and functions by linking a CPU, a memory, a storage medium, a display, an input device, and the like.

画像認識部2は、加熱前と加熱後に撮像された立方体形状の石炭灰の固形試料の画像を取得し、二値化等の画像処理を行うことにより、石炭灰の固形試料の輪郭を認識する。 The image recognition unit 2 acquires images of the cube-shaped solid sample of coal ash captured before and after heating, and performs image processing such as binarization to recognize the outline of the solid sample of coal ash. .

体積算出部3は、画像認識部2により取得された石炭灰の固形試料の輪郭から、立方体の各辺における長さを計測し、加熱前と加熱後とのそれぞれについて、石炭灰の固形試料の体積を算出する。 The volume calculation unit 3 measures the length of each side of the cube from the contour of the solid sample of coal ash acquired by the image recognition unit 2, and calculates the length of the solid sample of coal ash before and after heating. Calculate the volume.

体積比率算出部4は、体積算出部3において算出された加熱前と加熱後との石炭灰の体積から、体積比率を算出する。なお、体積比率は、加熱後の体積/加熱前の体積により算出される。 The volume ratio calculator 4 calculates the volume ratio from the volumes of coal ash before and after heating calculated by the volume calculator 3 . The volume ratio is calculated by dividing the volume after heating by the volume before heating.

膠着度推定部5は、算出された体積比率から、膠着度を推定する。膠着度推定部5は、具体的には、予め記憶された温度と体積比率と膠着度との相関マップに基づいて、例えば、1150℃のときの体積比率が0.98であれば膠着度が0.1~0.3の範囲というように、体積比率に対応する膠着度範囲を推定する。 The stickiness estimation unit 5 estimates the stickiness from the calculated volume ratio. Specifically, based on a pre-stored correlation map of temperature, volume ratio, and agglutination, the agglutination estimating unit 5 determines, for example, if the volume ratio at 1150° C. is 0.98, the agglutination is Estimate a cohesion range that corresponds to the volume ratio, such as the range 0.1 to 0.3.

付着性判定部6は、膠着度推定部5により推定された膠着度に基づいて、付着性を判定する。付着性判定部6は、予め記憶されたマップに基づいて、推定された膠着度に対応する付着性を判定し、モニタに表示させる。 The stickiness determination unit 6 determines stickiness based on the stickiness estimated by the stickiness estimation unit 5 . The adhesiveness determination unit 6 determines the adhesiveness corresponding to the estimated degree of agglutination based on a map stored in advance, and displays it on the monitor.

このような評価装置1を用いた評価方法について、図3を参照して説明する。
まず、作業者が立方体形状に成形された石炭灰の画像を撮像する(ステップS1)。そして、作業者が石炭灰を加熱炉にて加熱し(ステップS2)、加熱後の石炭灰を撮像する(ステップS3)。
An evaluation method using such an evaluation apparatus 1 will be described with reference to FIG.
First, an operator captures an image of coal ash formed into a cube (step S1). Then, the operator heats coal ash in a heating furnace (step S2), and takes an image of the coal ash after heating (step S3).

続いて、画像認識部2が撮像された画像から、加熱前の石炭灰の輪郭を抽出する。さらに、体積算出部3により、抽出された石炭灰の輪郭から、加熱前の石炭灰の体積を算出する(ステップS4)。
そして、ステップS3と同様の手順により、画像認識部2が加熱後の石炭灰の輪郭を抽出し、体積算出部3が加熱後の石炭灰の体積を算出する(ステップS5)。
Subsequently, the contour of coal ash before heating is extracted from the captured image by the image recognition unit 2 . Further, the volume calculator 3 calculates the volume of the coal ash before heating from the extracted outline of the coal ash (step S4).
Then, the image recognition section 2 extracts the outline of the coal ash after heating, and the volume calculation section 3 calculates the volume of the coal ash after heating (step S5).

次に、体積比率算出部4が算出された加熱前の体積と加熱後の体積との体積比率を算出する(体積比率算出工程)(ステップS6)。そして、膠着度推定部5が、体積比率に基づいて膠着度の範囲を推定する(膠着度推定工程)(ステップS7)。次に、付着性判定部6は、推定された膠着度に基づいて、付着性を判定し、モニタへと表示する(ステップS8)。 Next, the volume ratio calculation unit 4 calculates the volume ratio between the calculated volume before heating and the calculated volume after heating (volume ratio calculation step) (step S6). Then, the stickiness estimation unit 5 estimates the stickiness range based on the volume ratio (stickiness estimation step) (step S7). Next, the adhesiveness determination unit 6 determines the adhesiveness based on the estimated degree of agglutination, and displays it on the monitor (step S8).

このとき、付着性判定部6は、推定される付着性の範囲が、HighまたはMediumの範囲(所定範囲)内であるか否かを判定する(ステップS9)。付着性が所定範囲内である場合、すなわちステップS9の判定がYESの場合には、付着性判定部6は、膠着度を計測する指示をモニタに表示させる(ステップS10)。この場合、作業者は、指示に従って焼結灰の膠着度を実際に計測し、膠着度に基づいて、付着性を再評価する(膠着度計測工程)。なお、付着性が所定範囲外である場合には、ステップS10を行わない。 At this time, the adhesion determination unit 6 determines whether or not the estimated range of adhesion is within the High or Medium range (predetermined range) (step S9). If the adhesiveness is within the predetermined range, that is, if the determination in step S9 is YES, the adhesiveness determination section 6 causes the monitor to display an instruction to measure the degree of agglutination (step S10). In this case, the operator actually measures the degree of adhesion of the sintered ash according to instructions, and re-evaluates the degree of adhesion based on the degree of adhesion (adhesion measurement step). Note that step S10 is not performed when the adhesiveness is outside the predetermined range.

このような本実施形態に係る評価方法によれば、体積比率を算出することにより、付着性を判定することが可能である。したがって、亜瀝青炭の選定時に毎回膠着度の計測を行う必要がなく、簡易な方法で付着性の評価が可能である。 According to such an evaluation method according to the present embodiment, the adhesion can be determined by calculating the volume ratio. Therefore, it is not necessary to measure the degree of agglutination each time when sub-bituminous coal is selected, and it is possible to evaluate adhesion by a simple method.

また、本実施形態に係る評価方法によれば、付着性の評価が悪い(付着性がHighまたはMedium)場合に、膠着度試験を行うことで、より正確に亜瀝青炭の付着性を評価することが可能である。 Further, according to the evaluation method according to the present embodiment, when the adhesion is poorly evaluated (the adhesion is High or Medium), the adhesion test is performed to more accurately evaluate the adhesion of sub-bituminous coal. is possible.

[第2実施形態]
上記第1実施形態の変形例について、第2実施形態として説明する。なお、第1実施形態と同一の構成については符号を同一とし、説明を省略する。
[Second embodiment]
A modification of the first embodiment will be described as a second embodiment. It should be noted that the same reference numerals are used for the same configuration as in the first embodiment, and the description thereof is omitted.

本実施形態に係る評価装置1は、膠着度推定部5を有していない。また、評価装置1には、膠着度が0.6程度かつ付着性がMediumの亜瀝青炭(比較炭)の体積比率が予め記憶されている。そして、付着性判定部6は、体積比率を取得し、比較炭の体積比率との比較を行う。 The evaluation device 1 according to this embodiment does not have the stickiness estimation unit 5 . In addition, the volume ratio of sub-bituminous coal (comparative coal) having a degree of cohesion of about 0.6 and medium adhesion is stored in advance in the evaluation device 1 . Then, the adhesion determination unit 6 acquires the volume ratio and compares it with the volume ratio of the comparative coal.

このような本実施形態に係る評価方法について図4を参照して説明する。
まず、作業者が立方体形状に成形された石炭灰の画像を撮像する(ステップS11)。そして、作業者が石炭灰を加熱炉にて加熱し(ステップS12)、加熱後の石炭灰を撮像する(ステップS13)。
An evaluation method according to this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG.
First, an operator captures an image of coal ash formed into a cube (step S11). Then, the operator heats the coal ash in the heating furnace (step S12), and takes an image of the coal ash after heating (step S13).

続いて、画像認識部2が撮像された画像から、加熱前の石炭灰の輪郭を抽出する。さらに、体積算出部3により、抽出された石炭灰の輪郭から、加熱前の焼結灰の体積を算出する(ステップS14)。 Subsequently, the contour of coal ash before heating is extracted from the captured image by the image recognition unit 2 . Further, the volume calculator 3 calculates the volume of the sintered ash before heating from the extracted outline of the coal ash (step S14).

そして、ステップS3と同様の手順により、画像認識部2が加熱後の石炭灰の輪郭を抽出し、体積算出部3が加熱後の石炭灰の体積を算出する(ステップS15)。次に、体積比率算出部4が算出された加熱前の体積と加熱後の体積との体積比率を算出する(ステップS16)。 Then, the image recognition section 2 extracts the outline of the coal ash after heating, and the volume calculation section 3 calculates the volume of the coal ash after heating (step S15). Next, the volume ratio calculation unit 4 calculates the volume ratio between the calculated volume before heating and the volume after heating (step S16).

さらに、付着性判定部6は、体積比率が予め記憶された比較炭の収縮率以上であるか否かを判定する(ステップS17)。体積比率が比較炭以下の場合、すなわちステップS17の判定がYESの場合、付着性判定部6は、膠着度を計測する指示をモニタに表示させる(ステップS18)。この場合、作業者は、指示に従って石炭灰の焼結灰の膠着度を実際に計測し、膠着度に基づいて、付着性を再評価する。また、付着性判定部6は、比較炭よりも体積比率が大きい場合、当該亜瀝青炭を使用可と判定する(ステップS19)。 Further, the adhesion determination unit 6 determines whether or not the volume ratio is equal to or greater than the pre-stored shrinkage rate of the comparative coal (step S17). If the volume ratio is equal to or less than the comparison coal, that is, if the determination in step S17 is YES, the adhesion determining section 6 causes the monitor to display an instruction to measure the degree of agglutination (step S18). In this case, the operator actually measures the degree of adhesion of the sintered ash of the coal ash according to the instructions, and re-evaluates the adhesion based on the degree of adhesion. Further, when the volume ratio is larger than that of the comparative coal, the adhesion determination unit 6 determines that the sub-bituminous coal can be used (step S19).

本実施形態に係る評価装置1は、付着性判定部6が比較炭との比較によって評価対象の亜瀝青炭の付着性を評価する。したがって、評価装置1は、膠着度の推定を行わず、使用可あるいは要再検討の簡易的な判定を行う。すなわち、比較炭以上に体積収縮が大きく、付着性が高い可能性のあるものについては再検討とし、比較炭よりも体積収縮が小さく、付着性の低い可能性のあるものについては使用可能であると評価している。この場合、処理フローが簡易となり、判定が容易である。 In the evaluation apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment, the adhesion determination unit 6 evaluates the adhesion of the evaluation target sub-bituminous coal by comparison with the comparative coal. Therefore, the evaluation device 1 does not estimate the degree of agglutination, and makes a simple determination of whether the device can be used or needs to be reexamined. In other words, those with greater volumetric shrinkage than the comparative charcoal and with the possibility of higher adhesion should be re-examined, while those with smaller volumetric shrinkage and the possibility of lower adhesion than the comparative charcoal can be used. is evaluated. In this case, the processing flow becomes simple, and determination is easy.

以上、図面を参照しながら本発明の好適な実施形態について説明したが、本発明は上記実施形態に限定されるものではない。上述した実施形態において示した各構成部材の諸形状や組み合わせ等は一例であって、本発明の趣旨から逸脱しない範囲において設計要求等に基づき種々変更可能である。 Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above with reference to the drawings, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. The various shapes, combinations, and the like of the constituent members shown in the above-described embodiment are merely examples, and can be variously changed based on design requirements and the like without departing from the gist of the present invention.

上記実施形態においては、評価装置1を用いて評価を行うものとしたが、本発明はこれに限定されない。例えば、本発明に係る評価方法は、全て作業者が手作業により実行するものとしてもよい。 In the above embodiment, evaluation is performed using the evaluation device 1, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the evaluation method according to the present invention may be performed manually by an operator.

上記実施形態においては、体積比率に基づいて付着性を評価するものとしたが、本発明はこれに限定されない。例えば、加熱前の体積と加熱後の体積との差分と膠着度との相関に基づいて付着性を評価するものとしてもよい。この場合においても、加熱前後における体積の変化量に基づいて付着性を評価可能である。 In the above embodiment, the adhesion is evaluated based on the volume ratio, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the adhesion may be evaluated based on the correlation between the difference between the volume before heating and the volume after heating and the degree of stickiness. Also in this case, the adhesion can be evaluated based on the amount of change in volume before and after heating.

上記実施形態においては、付着性が高い場合に、膠着度を実際に計測するものとしたが、本発明はこれに限定されない。付着性判定部6は、付着性が高い場合に、HighまたはMediumと表示するのみとしてもよい。または、付着性判定部6は、付着性が高い場合に、他の付着性評価方法を用いることを推奨するものとしてもよい。 In the above embodiment, the degree of agglutination is actually measured when the adhesiveness is high, but the present invention is not limited to this. The adhesiveness determination unit 6 may only display High or Medium when the adhesiveness is high. Alternatively, the adhesion determination unit 6 may recommend using another adhesion evaluation method when the adhesion is high.

また、上記実施形態においては、画像認識により、石炭灰の体積を算出するものとしたが、本発明はこれに限定されない。例えば、3Dカメラや、3Dスキャン等により、石炭灰の試料の形状を取得し、体積を算出するものとしてもよい。この場合、より正確な石炭灰の試料の体積を算出することが可能である。 Further, in the above embodiment, the volume of coal ash is calculated by image recognition, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, a 3D camera, a 3D scan, or the like may be used to acquire the shape of the coal ash sample and calculate the volume. In this case, it is possible to calculate a more accurate coal ash sample volume.

1 評価装置
2 画像認識部
3 体積算出部
4 体積比率算出部
5 膠着度推定部
6 付着性判定部
1 Evaluation Device 2 Image Recognition Unit 3 Volume Calculation Unit 4 Volume Ratio Calculation Unit 5 Stickiness Estimation Unit 6 Adhesion Determination Unit

Claims (3)

微粉炭を燃料として用いる微粉炭ボイラにおける燃焼灰の伝熱管面付着性を評価する評価方法であって、
前記微粉炭が亜瀝青炭を含み、
前記燃焼灰の固形試料の加熱前の体積と、前記固形試料の加熱後の体積との相関に基づいて伝熱管面付着性を評価し、
前記相関は、前記固形試料の前記加熱前の体積と前記固形試料の加熱後の体積との体積比率であり、
前記体積比率が所定の範囲外の場合に、膠着度を計測する膠着度計測工程を備えることを特徴とする評価方法。
An evaluation method for evaluating the adhesion of combustion ash to a heat transfer tube surface in a pulverized coal boiler using pulverized coal as fuel,
the pulverized coal comprises sub-bituminous coal;
Evaluate the heat transfer tube surface adhesion based on the correlation between the volume of the solid sample of the combustion ash before heating and the volume of the solid sample after heating ,
The correlation is a volume ratio between the volume of the solid sample before heating and the volume of the solid sample after heating,
An evaluation method characterized by comprising a stickiness measuring step of measuring a stickiness when the volume ratio is outside a predetermined range .
前記体積比率を算出する体積比率算出工程と、
前記体積比率に基づいて前記微粉炭の膠着度を推定する膠着度推定工程と
を備えることを特徴とする請求項1記載の評価方法。
A volume ratio calculation step of calculating the volume ratio;
an agglutination estimation step of estimating the agglutination of the pulverized coal based on the volume ratio;
The evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized by comprising :
前記相関が既知でありかつ伝熱管面付着性が既知の微粉炭である比較炭の前記相関と、評価対象の微粉炭の前記相関とを比較することにより、伝熱管面付着性を評価することを特徴とする請求項1記載の評価方法。 Evaluating the heat transfer tube surface adhesion by comparing the correlation of the comparison coal, which is a pulverized coal of which the correlation is known and the heat transfer tube surface adhesion is known, with the correlation of the pulverized coal to be evaluated. The evaluation method according to claim 1 , characterized by:
JP2019050332A 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Evaluation method and evaluation device Active JP7227042B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019050332A JP7227042B2 (en) 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Evaluation method and evaluation device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019050332A JP7227042B2 (en) 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Evaluation method and evaluation device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020153714A JP2020153714A (en) 2020-09-24
JP7227042B2 true JP7227042B2 (en) 2023-02-21

Family

ID=72558652

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019050332A Active JP7227042B2 (en) 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Evaluation method and evaluation device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7227042B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7396930B2 (en) * 2020-02-28 2023-12-12 株式会社Ihi検査計測 driving system
AU2020433469B2 (en) * 2020-03-02 2023-09-14 Ihi Corporation Correlation deriving method and correlation deriving device
JP7426864B2 (en) * 2020-03-18 2024-02-02 株式会社Ihi検査計測 Method for predicting and evaluating combustion ash adhesion in coal-fired boilers
CN112946060B (en) * 2021-01-29 2023-10-20 西安热工研究院有限公司 Specific magnetization rate method for measuring slagging performance of bituminous coal ash

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004361368A (en) 2003-06-09 2004-12-24 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd Method for predicting/evaluating adhesion of coal ash, and method for preventing adhesion of coal ash
JP2012037221A (en) 2010-07-14 2012-02-23 Kobe Steel Ltd Method and device for suppressing deposition of ash in heating furnace
JP2013156228A (en) 2012-01-31 2013-08-15 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Fuel evaluation method and fuel adjustment method for avoiding slagging of low-grade fuel

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4976549A (en) * 1989-05-12 1990-12-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Apparatus and method for direct measurement of coal ash sintering and fusion properties at elevated temperatures and pressures

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004361368A (en) 2003-06-09 2004-12-24 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd Method for predicting/evaluating adhesion of coal ash, and method for preventing adhesion of coal ash
JP2012037221A (en) 2010-07-14 2012-02-23 Kobe Steel Ltd Method and device for suppressing deposition of ash in heating furnace
JP2013156228A (en) 2012-01-31 2013-08-15 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Fuel evaluation method and fuel adjustment method for avoiding slagging of low-grade fuel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020153714A (en) 2020-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP7227042B2 (en) Evaluation method and evaluation device
Mora et al. Sphericity, shape factor, and convexity measurement of coarse aggregate for concrete using digital image processing
WO2022142080A1 (en) Image comparison method and apparatus
US6512982B2 (en) Methods and systems for evaluating defects in metals
CN105717163A (en) Method for detecting flaw through infrared thermography
JP7045963B2 (en) How to operate the measuring device, measuring device, and program
CN110060293B (en) Defect detection performance limit evaluation method of CT detection system
Akpro Hippocrate et al. Food weight estimation using smartphone and cutlery
JP6077042B2 (en) Notch coefficient estimation method, notch coefficient estimation system, and notch coefficient estimation device
WO2022105676A1 (en) Method and system for measuring wear of workpiece plane
Li et al. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of infrared imaging system by modified slant edge method
Johansson et al. A method to estimate the circulated composition in refrigeration and heat pump systems using zeotropic refrigerant mixtures
CN108827962B (en) Egg maturity detection method based on light transmission method
Samann Real-time liquid level and color detection system using image processing
US20110071788A1 (en) Method and apparatus for the calculation of coal ash fusion values
WO2017080295A1 (en) Element positioning method and system
Goesele et al. Accuracy of 3D range scanners by measurement of the slanted edge modulation transfer function
CN105280125B (en) The display roughness detecting method and its detecting system of display
GB2547318A (en) Systems and methods for estimating modulation transfer function in an optical system
EP3759687B1 (en) Computer-implementated method for identifying mechanical properties by coupled correlation of images and mechanical modelling
JP5970300B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting thickness of coking in heating tube
Dogukan et al. Comparison of monitor-image and printout-image methods in Ki-67 scoring of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
TWI828344B (en) Coal analyzer, coal analysis method, method for preparing mixed coal and method for producing coke
Korbiel et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of mechanical transmission based on the assessment of energy dissipation
JP5070154B2 (en) Interface level detection method and interface level detection apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20211215

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20221031

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20221101

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20230104

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20230124

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20230209

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7227042

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150