JP7202549B2 - Evaluation support device, evaluation support method, and evaluation support program - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an evaluation support device, an evaluation support method, and an evaluation support program.

Traditionally, experienced caregivers or long-term care support specialists visit the residence of the target person, such as the elderly, to analyze the living situation and understand the problems and factors in life so that the target person can live independently. is being done. Specifically, caregivers or long-term care support specialists identify life-related issues and their factors through interviews with the subjects.

For example, in Patent Literature 1 below, according to input information of a person requiring assistance, the care needs of the person requiring assistance are determined, and a service that satisfies the need is searched from pre-stored service provider information. , and a care service plan support device that creates and outputs a service plan from the retrieved service.

JP-A-11-53455

In the technique described in Patent Literature 1, evaluations regarding items such as ADL (Activities of Daily Living) are input as support-requiring person information. However, in order to comprehensively analyze the issues in life and their factors, it is necessary to conduct interviews on a wide range of items.
Considerable time is required to assess whether the subject can live independently.

Accordingly, the present invention provides an evaluation support device, an evaluation support method, and an evaluation support program that support the evaluation of whether or not a subject can live independently in a shorter period of time.

An evaluation support device according to an aspect of the present disclosure includes an acquisition unit that acquires an evaluation regarding a motion performed by a subject, and converts the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items representing a plurality of physical functions, A calculation unit that calculates a degree of independence indicating a subject's degree of independence with respect to a plurality of items based on the score, and an output unit that outputs analysis content with respect to the plurality of items based on the degree of independence.

According to this aspect, it is possible to determine the content of analysis regarding a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions only by obtaining an evaluation of the motion performed by the subject, and to further determine whether the subject can live independently. We can help you to evaluate in a short time.

In the above aspect, the output unit may output items for detailed analysis and items for simple analysis among the plurality of items.

According to this aspect, the items to be analyzed in detail are output to support the appropriate evaluation of whether or not the subject can live independently, while the items to be briefly analyzed are output so that the analysis takes time can be shortened.

In the above aspect, the output unit may output a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be analyzed in detail and a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be briefly analyzed.

According to this aspect, appropriate questions can be output for each of the items to be analyzed briefly and the items to be analyzed in detail, so that it is possible to more efficiently evaluate whether or not the subject can live independently.

In the above aspect, the output unit selects, for items to be analyzed in detail, issues related to physical functions,
You may output training contents for improving a subject.

According to this aspect, it is possible for the subject and the assistant to easily grasp what kind of training should be performed in order to improve the physical function.

In the above aspect, the output unit may output, for the item to be analyzed in detail, an improvement prediction of the degree of independence that is expected when the training content is executed.

According to this aspect, it is possible to increase the motivation to exercise by outputting the predicted improvement in the degree of independence that is expected when the exercise for improving the physical function is performed.

In the above aspect, the calculation unit calculates the degree of independence based on at least one of information about the environment in which the subject operates, information about the cognitive level of the subject, and information about the past history of the subject, and the score. good.

According to this aspect, the degree of independence can be calculated more accurately by taking into account the information about the subject.

In the above aspect, the motion includes a plurality of element motions with a predetermined order, the acquisition unit acquires the evaluations of the plurality of element motions in order, and the calculation unit calculates the degree of independence each time the evaluation is acquired. The acquisition unit may omit the acquisition of the evaluation when the degree of independence is equal to or greater than the threshold.

According to this aspect, it is possible to obtain the prospect that the subject can live independently in a shorter period of time.

An evaluation support method according to another aspect of the present disclosure obtains an evaluation regarding a motion performed by a subject, converts the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, Based on the score, calculating the degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject regarding the plurality of items, and outputting the content of analysis regarding the plurality of items based on the degree of independence.

According to this aspect, it is possible to determine the content of the analysis regarding the plurality of items indicating the plurality of physical functions simply by obtaining the evaluation of the motion performed by the subject, and to determine whether the subject can live independently. We can help you get your assessment done in less time.

An evaluation support program according to another aspect of the present disclosure provides a computing unit provided in an evaluation support device,
An acquisition unit that acquires an evaluation regarding the motion performed by the subject, converts the evaluation into a score weighted according to multiple items indicating multiple physical functions, and based on the score, determines the independence of the subject regarding the multiple items. It functions as a calculation unit that calculates the degree of independence that indicates the degree of independence, and an output unit that outputs analysis content regarding a plurality of items based on the degree of independence.

According to this aspect, it is possible to determine the content of the analysis regarding the plurality of items indicating the plurality of physical functions simply by obtaining the evaluation of the motion performed by the subject, and to determine whether the subject can live independently. We can help you get your assessment done in less time.

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide an evaluation support device, an evaluation support method, and an evaluation support program capable of evaluating whether or not a subject can live independently in a shorter period of time.

It is a figure which shows the structure of the evaluation support system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the functional block of the evaluation support apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is a figure which shows the physical structure of the evaluation support apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is an example of the 1st screen displayed on the evaluation support apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is an example of the 2nd screen displayed on the evaluation support apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is an example of the 3rd screen displayed on the evaluation support apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is an example of the 4th screen displayed on the evaluation support apparatus which concerns on this embodiment. It is the example of the 5th screen displayed on the evaluation support device concerning this embodiment. 4 is a flowchart of evaluation support processing executed by the evaluation support device according to the embodiment; 4 is a flowchart of analysis processing executed by the evaluation support device according to the embodiment;

Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that, in each figure, the same reference numerals have the same or similar configurations.

§1 Application Example First, an example of a scene to which the present invention is applied will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an evaluation support system 100 according to an embodiment of the invention. Evaluation support system 1
00 includes an evaluation support device 10 and a server 20 . The evaluation support device 10 and the server 20 are configured to communicate with each other via a communication network N including the Internet and a LAN (Local Area Network).

The evaluation support device 10 is composed of a general-purpose computer and supports evaluation of whether or not the subject can live independently. Here, the target person is, for example, an elderly person, and the evaluation support device 10 may be used by a user such as a caregiver or a care support specialist.

In this specification, a case will be described in which the target person is an elderly person and the evaluation support device 10 assists in evaluating whether the target person can independently perform ADL. However, the evaluation support device 10 may support evaluation of whether or not the subject can independently perform IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living). In addition, the evaluation support device 10 may evaluate the subject using an index other than ADL and IADL as long as it is an item that indicates a person's physical function. In addition, the evaluation support device 10 can be used not only in nursing care facilities but also in homes and fitness clubs to support elderly people. In this specification, the term "independence" means that the subject can operate by himself/herself.

In the present embodiment, the degree of independence is estimated for each item indicating a plurality of physical functions by evaluating the motions performed by the subject relatively few times, and detailed analysis is performed for each item of the estimated degree of independence. It is characterized by changing items to be analyzed simply.

The evaluation support device 10 acquires an evaluation regarding the action performed by the subject. Evaluation support device 10
accepts an input of an evaluation by a user, such as a caregiver or a care support specialist, regarding an action performed by an elderly person, who is a target, through an input unit such as a touch panel, and acquires the input evaluation.

The evaluation support device 10 converts the acquired evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items representing a plurality of physical functions. Here, a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions are, for example, A
DL items. Based on the score, the evaluation support device 10 calculates the degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject with respect to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions. where the degree of independence is
It shows the possibility that the subject's physical function can lead to daily life. The higher the probability that the subject can lead daily life by himself, the higher the degree of independence.

Then, the evaluation support device 10 outputs analysis contents regarding a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions based on the degree of independence. The output analysis content may be displayed on a display unit integrated with or separate from the evaluation support device 10 . Here, the contents of analysis may be simple for items with a relatively high degree of independence, and detailed for items with a relatively low degree of independence. In this way, it is possible to reduce the time required to analyze whether or not the subject can live independently by making a difference in the content of the analysis.

The server 20 collects and stores the evaluation obtained by the evaluation support device 10, the calculated degree of independence, and the output analysis content. The server 20 may collect information from a plurality of evaluation support apparatuses 10, and may construct a database that collects results of evaluation support. Also, the server 20 may replace all or part of the functional units of the evaluation support device 10 .

As described above, according to the evaluation support device 10 according to the present embodiment, it is possible to output the analysis contents of a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions simply by acquiring the evaluation of the motion performed by the subject. It can help the subject to assess whether they can live independently in a shorter period of time.

§2 Configuration example [Functional configuration]
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing functional blocks of the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The evaluation support device 10 includes an input unit 10e and a display unit 10f as hardware configurations, and an acquisition unit 11, a calculation unit 12, an output unit 13, and a storage unit 14 as functional configurations.

<Acquisition part>
The acquisition unit 11 acquires an evaluation regarding the motion performed by the subject. For example, the acquisition unit 11
An evaluation input by a user such as a caregiver or a care support specialist through the input unit 10e is obtained for the action performed by the target elderly person. Also, the acquisition unit 11 may acquire, via the communication network N, an evaluation regarding the action performed by the subject, which is input from an external device.

<Calculation part>
The calculation unit 12 converts the evaluation into a score 14a weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculates the degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject regarding the plurality of items based on the score 14a. calculate. Here, the score 14a may be stored in the storage unit 14,
It may be calculated each time.

The calculation unit 12 may calculate the degree of independence based on at least one of information about the environment in which the subject operates, information about the cognitive level of the subject, and information about the past history of the subject, and the score. In this specification, the information about the environment in which the subject operates, the information about the cognitive level of the subject, and the information about the past history of the subject are collectively referred to as subject information 14c.
The information about the environment in which the subject operates includes, for example, information about the presence or absence of a step in the passage and the height of the bathtub. Information about the subject's cognitive level includes, for example, information about a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or a diagnosis of cognitive impairment. In addition, the information on the subject's medical history includes, for example, information on the name of the disease and the time of onset.

Based on the information about the environment in which the subject operates, the calculation unit 12 determines that when the path along which the subject is walking is not flat and includes relatively large steps, the degree of independence is calculated based on only the score. can be corrected to increase However, based on the information about the environment in which the subject operates, if the path along which the subject is walking is not flat and includes relatively large steps, the calculation unit 12 determines the physical function of the subject to climb over the steps. In order to obtain the Further, based on information about the environment in which the subject operates, if the bathtub used by the subject is relatively high, correction may be made so that the degree of independence is higher than in the case of calculation based only on the score. In this way, by adding the subject information 14c, the degree of independence can be calculated more accurately.

<Output part>
The output unit 13 outputs the contents of analysis on multiple items indicating multiple physical functions based on the degree of independence. The output analysis content may be displayed on the display unit 10f, or may be transmitted to an external device via the communication network N. The output unit 13 may output items for detailed analysis and items for simple analysis among the plurality of items. More specifically, the output unit 13 may output items for which the degree of independence is less than the threshold as items for detailed analysis, and may output items for which the degree of independence is equal to or greater than the threshold as items for simple analysis. In this way, by outputting the items for detailed analysis, the time required for analysis can be reduced by outputting the items for simple analysis while supporting the appropriate evaluation of whether or not the subject can live independently. can do.

The output unit 13 may output a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be analyzed in detail and a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be briefly analyzed. Here, the number of questions to be asked to the subject about the items to be analyzed in detail may be larger than the number of questions to be asked to the subject about the items to be briefly analyzed. Further, the question asked to the subject about the item to be analyzed in detail may be a question for narrowing down the subject related to the physical function related to the detailed analysis. The question asked to the subject about the item for simple analysis may be a question for confirming that there is no particular problem with the physical function related to the simple analysis. In this way, appropriate questions can be determined for each of the items for simple analysis and the items for detailed analysis, and it becomes possible to more efficiently evaluate whether or not the subject can live independently.

<Memory part>
The storage unit 14 stores a score 14a, an improvement record 14b, and subject information 14c. The improvement record 14b is information indicating how much the physical function has improved when training for improving the subject related to the physical function is performed. The improvement result 14b may include information indicating how much the degree of independence related to the physical function has improved when training for improving the subject related to the physical function is performed.

[Hardware configuration]
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the physical configuration of the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The evaluation support device 10 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 10a equivalent to a calculation unit, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 10b equivalent to a storage unit, and a ROM (Read only memory) equivalent to a storage unit.
memory) 10c, a communication unit 10d, an input unit 10e, and a display unit 10f. These components are connected to each other via a bus so that data can be sent and received. In this example, the case where the evaluation support device 10 is composed of one computer will be described, but the evaluation support device 10 may be realized by combining a plurality of computers. Also, the configuration shown in FIG. 3 is an example, and the evaluation support apparatus 10 may have configurations other than these, or may not have some of these configurations.

The CPU 10a is a control unit that controls the execution of programs stored in the RAM 10b or ROM 10c and performs data calculation and processing. The CPU 10a is a computing unit that calculates a subject's degree of independence and executes a program (evaluation support program) for determining analysis content.
The CPU 10a receives various data from the input section 10e and the communication section 10d, and displays the calculation results of the data on the display section 10f and stores them in the RAM 10b.

The RAM 10b is a rewritable part of the storage unit, and may be composed of, for example, a semiconductor memory element. The RAM 10b stores programs executed by the CPU 10a, scores used to calculate the degree of independence, information on past improvement results, information on the environment in which the subject operates, information on the cognitive level of the subject, information on the past history of the subject, and the like. You can remember. Note that these are examples, and the RAM 10b may store data other than these, or may not store some of them.

The ROM 10c is one of the storage units from which data can be read, and may be composed of, for example, a semiconductor memory element. The ROM 10c may store data that is not rewritten, such as an evaluation support program.

The communication unit 10d is an interface that connects the evaluation support device 10 to other devices. The communication unit 10d may be connected to a communication network N such as the Internet.

The input unit 10e receives data input from the user, and may include, for example, a touch panel or a keyboard.

The display unit 10f visually displays the calculation result by the CPU 10a, and may be configured by, for example, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display). The display unit 10f may display, for example, the degree of independence of the subject regarding items indicating a plurality of physical functions.

The evaluation support program may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium such as the RAM 10b and the ROM 10c and provided, or may be provided via a communication network connected by the communication unit 10d. In the evaluation support device 10, the CPU 10a executes the evaluation support program, thereby realizing the operations of the acquisition unit 11, the calculation unit 12, the output unit 13, etc. described with reference to FIG. It should be noted that these physical configurations are examples, and do not necessarily have to be independent configurations. For example, the evaluation support device 10 includes a CPU 10a and a RAM 1
0b and ROM 10c may be integrated into an LSI (Large-Scale Integration).

§3 Operation Example FIG. 4 is an example of the first screen displayed on the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The first screen example is displayed on the display section 10f. An input unit 10e configured by a touch panel is provided over the display unit 10f. Note that the first screen example may be displayed on a display unit separate from the evaluation support device 10 .

The first screen example is a screen example titled "ADL prediction result by basic operation check",
To display a list of degrees of independence for six ADLs: "1. Indoor walking", "2. Outdoor walking", "3. Excretion", "4. Eating", "5. Bathing", and "6. Dressing". is a screen example of
The six ADL items shown in this example are examples of multiple items representing multiple physical functions.
Note that this screen example is an example showing a state before the calculation of the degree of independence, and the degree of independence is not displayed for each item.

The first screen example includes a first icon D10 labeled "to basic operation check" and a second icon D20 labeled "detailed analysis". When the first icon D10 is tapped, the screen transitions to the second screen example shown in the next figure. Also, when the second icon D20 is tapped, the screen transitions to a screen for detailed analysis of each item.

If you tap the icon labeled "To IADL analysis", the A shown in the first screen example
As in the case of DL, the screen transitions to a screen displaying the degree of independence related to multiple items of IADL.

FIG. 5 is an example of a second screen displayed on the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The second screen example is an example of a screen displayed when the first icon D10 is tapped on the first screen example. Note that the second screen example may be displayed on a display unit separate from the evaluation support device 10 .

The second screen example includes a plurality of elementary actions D11, a check item D12, and a score D13. The plurality of element actions D11 have a predetermined order, and in this example, include "one leg standing", "sitting position", "stand-up action", "standing position", and "walking direction change". note that,
The plurality of element actions D11 in this example are ordered, but in general, the plurality of element actions may not be ordered. For example, the plurality of component motions may include component motions that can be performed in any order, such as a motion that tests upper body function, a motion that tests lower body function, and a motion that tests left-right balance of the body.

The acquisition unit 11 of the evaluation support device 10 may acquire evaluations of a plurality of elemental actions in the order of the elemental actions. In the case of this example, the acquisition unit 11 first acquires the evaluation of the element motion of “standing on one leg”. In the evaluation, the subject was asked to perform the elemental action of "standing on one leg".
The user observing the result selects the closest option among the check items D12. In the case of this example, the check item D
"5 to 10 seconds" out of 12 is selected.

Note that the evaluation support device 10 may acquire motion information in which the subject performs an elemental motion, and estimate an evaluation of the elemental motion based on the motion information. Here, the motion information may be a moving image in which the subject performs an elemental motion, or may be a motion sensor value. The evaluation support device 10 includes, for example, information indicating movement of the subject's skeleton obtained from a motion sensor,
By comparing information indicating normal skeletal movements when a healthy person performs each step, an evaluation of elemental movements may be calculated.

Each time an evaluation is obtained, the calculation unit 12 of the evaluation support device 10 converts the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items representing a plurality of physical functions, and based on the score, calculates a score for the plurality of items. A degree of independence may be calculated that indicates the subject's degree of independence with respect to. In this example, the evaluation of ``5 to 10 seconds'' for the element action of ``standing on one leg'' is converted into a score of ``30 pt.'' is converted to a score of "30 pt.", and the item indicating the physical function of "excretion" is converted to a score of "30 pt." In this case, the scores weighted according to the plurality of items indicating the plurality of physical functions are the same. That is, the weights are equal. The calculation unit 12 may calculate the degree of independence at the time when such an evaluation is performed, based on the score of each item. Specifically, the calculation unit 12 calculates the degree of independence for the item indicating the physical function “walking outdoors” as 30, and the degree of independence regarding the item indicating the physical function “bathing” as 30.
, and the degree of independence for the item indicating the physical function “excretion” may be calculated as 30.

The calculation unit 12 calculates a score obtained by converting the evaluation each time an evaluation regarding the element motion is obtained,
It may be added to the score obtained so far and updated as the latest score. In this manner, the calculation unit 12 may calculate the degree of independence for each item by summing the scores for a plurality of elemental actions.

In the case of this example, the evaluation of "stand-up motion" is "no assistance required", and the evaluation of "no assistance required" is converted into a score of "0 pt." The item indicating the physical function "bathing" is converted into a score of "10 pt.", and the item indicating the physical function "excretion" is converted into a score of "5 pt.". In this case, scores weighted according to multiple items indicating multiple physical functions are different. That is, the weighting is different. The calculation unit 12 does not change the degree of independence related to the item indicating the physical function "walking outdoors", updates the degree of independence related to the item indicating the physical function "bathing" by adding 10, and updates the degree of independence related to the item indicating the physical function "excretion". 5 is added to the degree of independence related to the item indicating and updated.

The acquisition unit 11 may omit the acquisition of the evaluation when the degree of independence is equal to or greater than the threshold. For example, if the degree of independence for all physical functions exceeds the threshold during the evaluation of multiple elemental movements, it is expected that there will be no problems with all physical functions even if the evaluation of the elemental movements is not continued. is obtained. In such cases, the evaluation can be skipped, allowing the subject to obtain a more rapid prospect of being able to live independently.

FIG. 6 is an example of a third screen displayed on the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. Note that the third screen example may be displayed on a display unit separate from the evaluation support device 10 .

The third screen example is a screen example titled "ADL prediction result by basic operation check",
To display a list of degrees of independence for six ADLs: "1. Indoor walking", "2. Outdoor walking", "3. Excretion", "4. Eating", "5. Bathing", and "6. Dressing". is a screen example of
This screen example is an example showing a state after the calculation of the independence degree in the second screen example, and the independence degree D22 is displayed for each item.

For example, the degree of independence D22 for the item "1. Indoor walking" is 30 or more and less than 50, which is better than "limited independence (can be done in limited circumstances)", but "universal independence (
It's worse than "You can do it anywhere." Further, for example, the degree of independence D22 regarding the item "5. Bathing" is 15 or more and less than 30, which is better than "Partial care (impossible than before)", but "Limited independence (limited It is in a worse state than ”.
If the degree of independence D22 is less than 15, it indicates that the state is between "full assistance (impossible)" and "partial assistance (impossible than before)".

In the third screen example, an item for detailed analysis and an item for simple analysis are displayed for a plurality of items indicating physical function. In this example, the items to be analyzed in detail are the items whose degree of independence D22 is less than 50, and the items to be briefly analyzed are the items whose degree of independence D22 is 50 or more. Specifically, the items "1. Indoor walking", "2. Outdoor walking", and "5. Bathing" are the items to be analyzed in detail, and the second icon D20 for transitioning to the screen for detailed analysis is displayed. ing. Also, the items "3. Excretion", "4. Meal" and "6. Dressing" are items for simple analysis, and a third icon D21 for transitioning to the fourth screen example for simple analysis is displayed. .

FIG. 7 is an example of a fourth screen displayed on the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The fourth screen example is an example of a screen displayed when the third icon D21 is tapped on the third screen example. Note that the fourth screen example may be displayed on a display unit separate from the evaluation support device 10 .

The fourth screen example is an example of a screen titled "Confirmation of ADL status for 'Excretion'" and "3. Excretion".
ADL independence degree D22 and a question D23 to be asked to the subject are displayed. Question D2
In box 3, "prediction result by basic operation check", "It was determined that there is a high possibility of being in a universally independent state. Please make a final confirmation and confirmation by asking the following questions." As an example of a question, "Example 1) Can you use the toilet without any problems?"
"Example 2) The toilet may be a failure," is shown. The user, such as a caregiver or a nursing care support specialist, asks the subject a question with reference to such question examples, and selects "3. Excretion."
A final confirmation is made as to whether or not the ADL is universally independent.

As a result of the question, if it is confirmed that the subject is in a state of universal independence, tap the icon of "Confirm ADL" to confirm the analysis result regarding "3. Excretion". On the other hand, if you are not sure whether you are in a universal independent state or not, tap the “task analysis” icon to transition to a screen for detailed analysis, and “3. Identify training content for

FIG. 8 is an example of a fifth screen displayed on the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The fifth screen example is an example of a screen displayed when analysis of all six ADL items is completed. Note that the fifth screen example may be displayed on a display unit separate from the evaluation support device 10 .

The evaluation support device 10 outputs examples of questions and tests for specifying issues related to physical functions for items to be analyzed in detail, and furthermore, questions and examples of tests for specifying training content for improving the issues. Print an example. The user, such as a caregiver or a nursing care support specialist, interviews the subject according to the examples of those questions and tests, and discusses issues related to physical function and
Identify training content to improve the issue.

The output unit 13 of the evaluation support device 10 outputs, for the item to be analyzed in detail, a problem related to physical function and training content for improving the problem. In this screen example, "1. Indoor walking", "
2. Walking outdoors”, “5. Bathing”, and “6. Dressing”, task D31 and training content D32 for improving the task are shown. In addition, in this screen example, training content D
32 is entitled "Approach".

In the case of this example, for the item "1. Indoor walking", the task is "impaired walking on steps due to weakened leg muscles", and the training content for solving the task is "leg training". In this way, it is possible for the subject and the assistant to easily grasp what kind of training should be performed in order to improve the physical function.

The output unit 13 of the evaluation support device 10 outputs a predicted improvement in the degree of independence that is expected when the training content is executed for the items to be analyzed in detail. In this screen example, "1. Indoor walking", "2.
Walking outdoors”, “5. Bathing”, and “6. Changing clothes”, improvement predictions D30 are shown. The evaluation support device 10 predicts an improvement in the degree of independence based on an improvement result 14b that indicates how much the degree of independence has improved when a person who has the same or similar task as the subject executes the training content. can be calculated.

In this example, for the item "1. Indoor walking", the degree of independence was 30 or more and less than 50, but according to the improvement prediction, it is expected that the degree of independence will be improved to 50 or more by conducting training. It is shown. In addition, regarding the item "5. Bathing", the degree of independence was 15 or more and less than 30, but according to the improvement prediction, it is expected that the degree of independence will be partially improved to 30 or more and less than 50 by conducting training. It is shown. In this way, by outputting an improvement prediction of the degree of independence expected when training for improving physical function is performed, it is possible to strengthen the motivation for training.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart of evaluation support processing executed by the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. The evaluation support device 10 first acquires an evaluation regarding the motion performed by the subject (S10). Then, the evaluation support device 10 converts the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculates the degree of independence of the subject based on the score and subject information ( S11).

After that, the evaluation support device 10 displays items for detailed analysis and items for simple analysis based on the degree of independence (S12). If there is an item whose analysis has not been completed among the plurality of items indicating the plurality of physical functions (S13: NO), the evaluation support device 10 executes analysis processing (S14
). The details of the analysis process will be explained using the following diagram.

When analysis is completed for all multiple items indicating multiple physical functions (S13: YES)
, the evaluation support device 10 displays the task related to the physical function, the content of the training for improving the task, and the predicted improvement of the degree of independence (S15). Thus, the evaluation support processing ends.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of analysis processing executed by the evaluation support device 10 according to this embodiment. FIG. 10 shows the details of the process S14 shown in FIG.

First, when the degree of independence of the item indicating the physical function related to the analysis is equal to or greater than the threshold (S141:
YES), the evaluation support device 10 displays a simple question (S142). Then, if there is no change in the evaluation (S143: YES), the analysis process is terminated. On the other hand, if there is a change in the rating (
S143: NO), the evaluation support device 10 corrects the degree of independence (S144). More specifically, the evaluation support device 10 converts the updated evaluation into a score, and recalculates the degree of independence based on the score. Then, referring to the corrected independence degree, the process S141 and subsequent steps are executed again.

On the other hand, if the degree of independence of the item indicating the physical function related to the analysis is less than the threshold (S141: NO
), the evaluation support device 10 executes a detailed analysis (S145). After that, the evaluation support device 10
specifies the problem related to the physical function to be analyzed and the content of training for improving the problem (S146). With the above, the analysis processing ends.

Embodiments of the invention may also be described as the following appendices. However, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the forms described in the following supplementary notes. Further, the embodiment of the present invention may be a form in which descriptions between appendices are replaced or combined.

[Appendix 1]
an acquisition unit (11) for acquiring an evaluation regarding the motion performed by the subject;
Calculation for converting the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculating a degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject regarding the plurality of items based on the score a part (12);
an output unit (13) that outputs analysis content regarding the plurality of items based on the degree of independence;
An evaluation support device (10) comprising:

[Appendix 2]
The output unit (13) outputs an item for detailed analysis and an item for simple analysis among the plurality of items.
An evaluation support device (10) according to appendix 1.

[Appendix 3]
The output unit (13) outputs a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be analyzed in detail and a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be briefly analyzed.
An evaluation support device (10) according to appendix 2.

[Appendix 4]
The output unit (13) outputs, for the item to be analyzed in detail, an issue related to physical function and training content for improving the issue.
An evaluation support device (10) according to appendix 2 or 3.

[Appendix 5]
The output unit (13) outputs a prediction of improvement in the degree of independence expected when the training content is executed for the item to be analyzed in detail.
An evaluation support device (10) according to appendix 4.

[Appendix 6]
The calculation unit (12) calculates the degree of independence based on at least one of information about the environment in which the subject operates, information about the cognitive level of the subject, and information about the past history of the subject, and the score. to calculate
6. An evaluation support device (10) according to any one of appendices 1 to 5.

[Appendix 7]
the action includes a plurality of ordered element actions;
The acquisition unit (11) acquires evaluations of the plurality of element motions in the order,
The calculation unit (12) updates the degree of independence each time the evaluation is obtained,
The acquisition unit (11) omits acquisition of the evaluation when the degree of independence is equal to or greater than a threshold.
7. An evaluation support device (10) according to any one of appendices 1 to 6.

[Appendix 8]
Obtaining an evaluation of actions performed by a subject;
Converting the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculating a degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject with respect to the plurality of items based on the score. When,
outputting analysis content regarding the plurality of items based on the degree of independence;
evaluation support methods, including;

[Appendix 9]
The calculation unit provided in the evaluation support device (10),
an acquisition unit (11) for acquiring an evaluation regarding the motion performed by the subject;
Converting the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions;
A calculation unit (12) for calculating, based on the score, a degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject regarding the plurality of items; and an output for outputting analysis content regarding the plurality of items based on the degree of independence. Part (13),
An evaluation support program that functions as a

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10... Evaluation support apparatus 10a...CPU, 10b...RAM, 10c...ROM, 10d...Communication part, 10e...Input part, 10f...Display part, 11...Acquisition part, 12...Calculation part, 13...Output part,
14... Storage unit 14a... Score 14b... Improvement performance 14c... Subject information 20... Server 100... Evaluation support system

Claims (9)

an acquisition unit that acquires an evaluation of an action performed by a subject;
Calculation for converting the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculating a degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject regarding the plurality of items based on the score Department and
an output unit that outputs the degree of independence related to the plurality of items;
An evaluation support device comprising: The output unit outputs an item for detailed analysis and an item for simple analysis among the plurality of items.
The evaluation support device according to claim 1. The output unit outputs a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be analyzed in detail and a question to be asked to the subject about the item to be briefly analyzed.
3. The evaluation support device according to claim 2. The output unit outputs, for the item to be analyzed in detail, an issue related to physical function and training content for improving the issue.
4. The evaluation support device according to claim 2 or 3. The output unit outputs a prediction of improvement in the degree of independence expected when the training content is executed for the item to be analyzed in detail.
The evaluation support device according to claim 4. The calculation unit calculates the degree of independence based on at least one of information about the environment in which the subject operates, information about the cognitive level of the subject, and information about the past history of the subject, and the score. ,
The evaluation support device according to any one of claims 1 to 5. the action includes a plurality of ordered element actions;
The acquisition unit acquires evaluations of the plurality of element motions in the order,
The calculation unit updates the degree of independence each time the evaluation is acquired,
wherein the acquisition unit omits acquisition of the evaluation when the degree of independence is equal to or greater than a threshold;
The evaluation support device according to any one of claims 1 to 6. An evaluation support method performed by an evaluation support device,
Obtaining an evaluation of actions performed by a subject;
Converting the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculating a degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject with respect to the plurality of items based on the score. When,
outputting the degree of independence for the plurality of items;
evaluation support methods, including; The calculation unit provided in the evaluation support device is
an acquisition unit that acquires an evaluation regarding an action performed by a subject;
A calculation unit that converts the evaluation into a score weighted according to a plurality of items indicating a plurality of physical functions, and calculates a degree of independence indicating the degree of independence of the subject regarding the plurality of items based on the score. ,as well as
an output unit that outputs the degree of independence related to the plurality of items;
An evaluation support program that functions as a

Images