JP6928687B1 - Organizational health evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an organizational health evaluation system capable of preventing leakage of confidential information caused by unauthorized access to an administrator terminal. SOLUTION: An organization health evaluation system 100 for evaluating the health of an organization evaluates and evaluates the health of the organization based on information of an individual belonging to the organization, and the evaluated health of the organization is transmitted to a user terminal 101. An administrator terminal 102 for output is provided. The administrator terminal stores the evaluated health of the organization together with the attribute information indicating the attributes of the evaluated organization, and when evaluating the health of other organizations, the administrator terminal stores the health of the evaluated organization. Based on the stored tissue health and attribute information, the relevance of attributes is determined among a plurality of tissues, and the tissue health is relatively evaluated among a plurality of tissues having similar attributes. [Selection diagram] Fig. 1

Description

The present invention relates to a tissue health evaluation system for evaluating tissue health.

Traditionally, the health of an individual has been evaluated (see, for example, Patent Document 1), but in recent years, the health of an organization has also been evaluated in order to visualize the problems faced by the organization. (See, for example, Non-Patent Document 1). Further, by comparing the health degree of a tissue with the health degree of another tissue, the health degree of the tissue is relatively evaluated among a plurality of tissues (see, for example, Patent Document 2).

When evaluating the health of an organization, the information of individuals belonging to the organization is input from the user terminal to the administrator terminal, and the health of the organization is evaluated and evaluated by the administrator terminal based on the input personal information. The health level of the organization is output from the administrator terminal to the user terminal.

Japanese Patent No. 5091595 Japanese Patent No. 6626170 Japanese Patent No. 4429619 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2020-3989

"Improvement of human productivity by medical assessment of organization", [online], 2009, Japan Research Institute, Limited, [Search on March 10, 2nd year of Reiwa], Internet <URL: https://www.jri.co.jp/MediaLibrary/file/service/pdf/292_1.pdf>

When assessing the health of a tissue relatively among multiple tissues, it is meaningless unless the health of the tissue is compared with the health of other tissues having similar attributes. Personal information used in assessing the health of the organization is stored in the administrator terminal to determine the relevance of the attributes.

However, since the personal information used to evaluate the health of the organization includes confidential information that can identify the individual, if the personal information containing the confidential information is stored in the administrator terminal, for example. , There is a risk that confidential information will be leaked due to unauthorized access to the administrator terminal.

When transmitting information from the administrator terminal to the user terminal, if the information to be transmitted contains confidential information, the confidential information is deleted from the information to be transmitted to prevent the leakage of the confidential information. Although things have been done (see, for example, Patent Document 3), as long as the confidential information is stored in the administrator terminal, leakage of the confidential information due to unauthorized access to the administrator terminal is completely prevented. I can't do it.

Further, although it is conceivable to anonymize or encrypt the information stored in the administrator terminal (see, for example, Patent Document 4), confidential information is not necessarily based on the anonymized or encrypted information. It cannot be said that it cannot be restored.

In view of the above circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide an organizational health evaluation system capable of preventing leakage of confidential information due to unauthorized access to an administrator terminal.

The present invention is an tissue health evaluation system for evaluating the health of an organization, comprising an administrator terminal for evaluating the health of the organization based on information of an individual belonging to the organization, and the administrator terminal is evaluated. The health of a tissue is associated with the health of the evaluated tissue, and is stored together with attribute information indicating the attributes of the tissue. When evaluating the health of other tissues, the health of the stored tissue is stored. The relevance of attributes is judged among a plurality of organizations based on the above-mentioned and attribute information, the health of the organization is relatively evaluated among a plurality of organizations having similar attributes, and the attribute information identifies an individual. The health level of the organization does not include the confidential information to be obtained, and has an irreversible property that the personal information cannot be derived based on the health level of the tissue, and any of the information stored in the administrator terminal is available. Provide an organizational health assessment system that does not include confidential information.

In addition, the health level of the organization includes a plurality of individual scores relating to work, private life, lifestyle, health, and / or financial conditions, and a total score calculated based on a plurality of individual scores in the previous term.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY According to the present invention, it is possible to provide an organizational health evaluation system capable of preventing leakage of confidential information caused by unauthorized access to an administrator terminal.

It is a figure explaining the structure of the tissue health degree evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a figure explaining the operation of the tissue health degree evaluation system which concerns on embodiment of this invention.

Embodiments of the present invention will be described in accordance with the accompanying drawings.

[Structure of organizational health evaluation system]
As shown in FIG. 1, in the organization health evaluation system 100 according to the embodiment of the present invention, information of an individual (for example, an employee) belonging to an organization (for example, a company) is input from a user terminal 101 and input. The administrator terminal 102 is provided to evaluate the health degree of the organization based on the personal information obtained and output the evaluated health degree of the organization to the user terminal 101.

The user terminal 101 is a terminal managed under the responsibility of the person who uses the organization health evaluation system 100, and the administrator terminal 102 is managed under the responsibility of the person who provides the organization health evaluation system 100. The user terminal 101 and the administrator terminal 102 are connected via, for example, the network 103.

The administrator terminal 102 may collectively execute all functions (for example, a function of calculating the health of an organization or a function of comparing the health of an organization) with only one terminal, and a plurality of terminals may be used. It may be the one that executes each function in a distributed manner. That is, the administrator terminal 102 may be composed of only one terminal, or may be composed of a plurality of terminals.

In addition, the administrator terminal 102 includes a database 104 in which information is stored. The database 104 may be realized by the internal storage device of the administrator terminal 102, or may be realized by the external storage device of the administrator terminal 102.

Personal information includes, for example, personnel / labor-related information, health-related information, welfare-related information, and / or questionnaire-related information. Personnel / labor-related information includes, for example, gender, place of work, industry (industry) to which the organization belongs, department, occupation, job title, date of birth, year of employment, employment form, employment form, presence of children, within the family. Includes items related to caregiver presence, attendance, and / or personnel evaluation. Health-related information includes, for example, items related to health diagnosis results. Benefits-related information includes, for example, items related to benefits utilization status. Questionnaire-related information includes, for example, items related to answering questions about work, private life, lifestyle, health, and / or financial conditions.

The health of an organization is, for example, a total of multiple individual scores for work, private life, lifestyle, health, and / or financial conditions, which are calculated based on personal information, and multiple individual scores. Includes score and.

In order to calculate individual scores, personal information is used as teacher data, and personal information is preprocessed (for example, normalization on multiple scales and supplementation of missing values), and preprocessed personal information. Is analyzed by machine learning such as random forest and multivariate analysis such as multiple regression analysis, and by determining and selecting the magnitude of the influence of each item included in personal information on each individual score, an individual When the information of is input, a trained model in which the individual score is calculated is generated in advance by extracting the items necessary for calculating the individual score.

By inputting personal information into the trained model, it is possible to calculate the individual score for each individual. The total score of an individual unit can be calculated, for example, by superimposing each individual score of the individual unit together with a coefficient corresponding to each individual score. Further, the individual score of the organizational unit and the total score of the organizational unit can be calculated by averaging the individual score of the individual unit and the total score of the individual unit, for example.

Individual scores and overall scores for individual and organizational units are calculated based on individual information, but even if the individual scores and overall scores are the same, the individuals used to calculate the individual scores and overall scores Since the information in the above is not always the same, it is not possible to back-calculate the personal information based on the individual score or the total score. That is, the health level of an organization has an irreversibility in which personal information cannot be derived based on the health level of the tissue.

Therefore, although the personal information used in evaluating the health of the organization includes confidential information that can identify the individual, the confidential information cannot be calculated back based on the health of the organization.

Further, the administrator terminal 102 associates the health degree of the evaluated organization (specifically, the individual score or the total score of the individual unit and the organization unit) with the health degree of the evaluated organization, and the administrator terminal 102 is associated with the health degree of the evaluated organization. When storing together with attribute information indicating attributes and evaluating the health of other organizations, the relevance of attributes is judged among multiple organizations based on the stored health of the organization and the attribute information, and the same is true. Relatively assess the health of an organization among multiple organizations with attributes (eg, between peers, between same surnames, between same occupations, and / or between age groups).

For example, if the organization to be evaluated is the entire company, the attribute information is information on matters common to the entire company (for example, information on the industry to which the company belongs), and the organization to be evaluated is the company. If it is a part, it is information about matters common to a part of the company (for example, information about gender, place of work, department, occupation, job title, age, year of employment, form of employment, and / or employment form). ..

Therefore, the attribute information is information on matters common to the organization to be evaluated (in other words, the population), and no matter which attribute information is multiplied, an individual cannot be uniquely identified. That is, the attribute information does not include confidential information that can identify an individual.

The information stored in the administrator terminal 102 is the attribute information associated with the health degree of the organization and the health degree of the organization, and neither the health degree of the organization nor the attribute information includes confidential information. Therefore, even if the administrator terminal 102 is illegally accessed, the information that can be acquired from the administrator terminal 102 does not include the confidential information, so that the secret information may be leaked due to the unauthorized access to the administrator terminal 102. It can be prevented.

The administrator terminal 102 not only evaluates the health of the tissue relatively among a plurality of tissues having similar attributes by comparing the health of the tissue with the health of other tissues. If the evaluated health of the tissue is inferior to that of other tissues, measures that contribute to the improvement of the health of the tissue may be proposed.

For example, if an organization's private personal score is lower than another organization's private personal score, it may encourage individuals in that organization to use benefits services that help improve their private personal score. If the benefits service is not included in the organization's benefits, it may encourage the organization to expand its benefits.

Further, the manager terminal 102 may measure the effect of the implementation of the measure by evaluating the health degree of the organization over time, that is, before and after the implementation of the measure.

[Operation of tissue health evaluation system]
As shown in FIG. 2, in the organization health evaluation system 100, when the information of the individual belonging to the organization is input from the user terminal 101 to the administrator terminal 102, the input personal information is input in the first processing step S101. Evaluate the health of the tissue based on. That is, the individual score and the total score of the individual unit and the organizational unit are calculated.

In the next processing step S102, the health degree of the evaluated tissue is stored in the database 104 together with the attribute information indicating the attribute of the tissue, which is associated with the health degree of the evaluated tissue.

In the processing step S103, the relevance of the attributes is determined among a plurality of organizations based on the health level and the attribute information of other organizations stored so far, and the evaluated organization and the organization having a high relevance of the attributes are determined. The health of the tissue is extracted from the database 104.

After that, in the treatment step S104, by comparing the health of the tissue evaluated in the treatment step S101 with the health of other tissues extracted in the treatment step S103, among a plurality of tissues having similar attributes. Evaluate the health of the tissue relatively.

In the final treatment step S105, measures to be taken based on the relatively evaluated health of the tissue are proposed.

As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide the organization health evaluation system 100 capable of preventing the leakage of confidential information caused by unauthorized access to the administrator terminal 102.

100 Organizational health evaluation system 101 User terminal 102 Administrator terminal 103 Network 104 Database

Claims (1)

It is an organizational health evaluation system that evaluates the health of an organization.
Equipped with an administrator terminal that evaluates the health of the organization based on the information of individuals belonging to the organization
The administrator terminal stores the health degree of the evaluated organization together with the attribute information indicating the attribute of the evaluated organization, and when evaluating the health degree of another organization. , Judge the relevance of attributes among multiple organizations based on the stored tissue health and attribute information, and evaluate the relative health of tissues among multiple organizations with similar attributes.
The attribute information does not include confidential information that can identify an individual.
The health of the tissue has an irreversibility that cannot derive the personal information based on the health of the tissue.
The information stored in the administrator terminal is the health level of the organization and the attribute information, neither of which includes confidential information .
The information that can be obtained from the administrator terminal does not include confidential information.
The administrator terminal is
Based on the individual information, the individual score of the individual unit is calculated using the learned model generated in advance, and the total score of the individual unit is calculated based on the individual score of the individual unit.
An organizational health evaluation system characterized by calculating an individual score of an organizational unit and an overall score of an organizational unit based on the individual score of the individual unit and the total score of the individual unit.

Images