JP6917598B2 - Texture evaluation method - Google Patents

Texture evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6917598B2
JP6917598B2 JP2019055832A JP2019055832A JP6917598B2 JP 6917598 B2 JP6917598 B2 JP 6917598B2 JP 2019055832 A JP2019055832 A JP 2019055832A JP 2019055832 A JP2019055832 A JP 2019055832A JP 6917598 B2 JP6917598 B2 JP 6917598B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sample
strain
plunger
stress
texture
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2019055832A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020159693A (en
Inventor
貴一 徳久
貴一 徳久
次朗 瀬戸
次朗 瀬戸
三浦 靖
靖 三浦
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Iwate University
Nissin Foods Holdings Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Iwate University
Nissin Foods Holdings Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Iwate University, Nissin Foods Holdings Co Ltd filed Critical Iwate University
Priority to JP2019055832A priority Critical patent/JP6917598B2/en
Publication of JP2020159693A publication Critical patent/JP2020159693A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6917598B2 publication Critical patent/JP6917598B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Description

本発明は、肉等の線維構造を有する食品の食感の評価方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the texture of a food having a fibrous structure such as meat.

従来、食品の食感を分析する方法として、圧縮試験機や引っ張り試験機等の試験機を用いて食品の物性を分析する方法が知られている(例えば、特許文献1及び2)。しかしながら、これらの一般的な分析方法で検出されるパラメータでは、肉などの線維構造を有する食品の食感を分析する場合、細かい食感の違いを検出することができず、食感について評価、分類する方法としては、適していなかった。 Conventionally, as a method of analyzing the texture of food, a method of analyzing the physical characteristics of food using a testing machine such as a compression tester or a tensile tester is known (for example, Patent Documents 1 and 2). However, with the parameters detected by these general analysis methods, when analyzing the texture of foods having a fibrous structure such as meat, it is not possible to detect fine differences in texture, and the texture is evaluated. It was not suitable as a classification method.

特許第5616216号公報Japanese Patent No. 5616216 特公昭62−34375号公報Special Publication No. 62-34375

本発明は、従来使用されている分析装置を用いて簡便な方法で食品の食感、特に肉などの線維構造を有する食品の食感を評価する方法を提供することを課題とする。 An object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the texture of foods, particularly the texture of foods having a fibrous structure such as meat, by a simple method using a conventionally used analyzer.

発明者らは、肉や組織状蛋白などの線維構造を有する食品の食感を分析し、評価する方法を鋭意検討したが、従来の方法では、細かい食感について満足のいく評価、分類ができなかった。そこで鋭意研究した結果、ゆっくりと食品を押圧する初期段階の物性のパラメータを評価することで、細かい食感を評価、分類できることを見出しが本発明に至った。 The inventors have diligently examined a method for analyzing and evaluating the texture of foods having a fibrous structure such as meat and tissue protein, but the conventional method enables satisfactory evaluation and classification of fine texture. There wasn't. Therefore, as a result of diligent research, it was found that the fine texture can be evaluated and classified by evaluating the parameters of the physical properties at the initial stage of slowly pressing the food, which led to the present invention.

すなわち、単軸圧縮試験機を用いて、直径が3〜8mmの円柱形のプランジャーを0.05〜1.0mm/sの移動速度で等速移動させ食品を押圧し、弾性率及び弾性限界歪みを分析し、前記弾性率及び前記弾性限界歪みをそれぞれ軸とした2軸グラフにて食品の食感を評価することを特徴とする、食品の食感評価方法である。 That is, using a uniaxial compression tester, a cylindrical plunger with a diameter of 3 to 8 mm is moved at a constant speed of 0.05 to 1.0 mm / s to press the food, and the elastic modulus and elastic limit are reached. This is a method for evaluating the texture of a food, which comprises analyzing the strain and evaluating the texture of the food with a two-axis graph with the elastic modulus and the elastic limit strain as axes.

本発明により、従来行われている分析装置を用いて簡便な方法で食品の食感、特に肉などの線維構造を有する食品の食感を評価する方法を提供することができる。 INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a method for evaluating the texture of a food, particularly the texture of a food having a fibrous structure such as meat, by a simple method using a conventionally performed analyzer.

応力―歪み曲線の例を示したグラフGraph showing an example of stress-strain curve 実験1の応力―歪み曲線を示したグラフGraph showing stress-strain curve of Experiment 1 実験2の応力―歪み曲線を示したグラフGraph showing stress-strain curve of Experiment 2 実施例1の弾性率と弾性限界歪みとの関係を示した散布図Scatter plot showing the relationship between the elastic modulus of Example 1 and the elastic limit strain 実施例2の弾性率と弾性限界歪みとの関係を示した散布図Scatter plot showing the relationship between the elastic modulus of Example 2 and the elastic limit strain 比較例1の各サンプルの代表的な検体の応力―歪み曲線を示したグラフA graph showing the stress-strain curve of a typical sample of each sample of Comparative Example 1.

以下、本発明について詳細に説明する。ただし、本発明は以下の記載に限定されるものではない。 Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail. However, the present invention is not limited to the following description.

1.分析サンプルの調整
本発明に係る評価方法の評価対象となる食品は、特に限定はないが、肉などの線維構造を有する食品が好ましく、牛、豚、鳥の畜肉だけでなく、魚介類の魚肉や、大豆蛋白等を押し出すことで製造される組織状蛋白などが挙げられる。これらの食品または食品を加工した食品から測定する部分を切断し、分析サンプルを調整する。分析サンプルの大きさは、後述するプランジャーの接する面が平坦でプランジャー径の2倍以上の大きさであることが好ましい。また、分析サンプルの厚みについては、薄すぎると押圧したときに分析サンプルを載せた板からの反動力を測定してしまうため、少なくとも2mm以上あることが好ましい。
1. 1. Preparation of analytical sample The food to be evaluated by the evaluation method according to the present invention is not particularly limited, but a food having a fibrous structure such as meat is preferable, and not only beef, pork and bird meat, but also seafood fish meat. And histological proteins produced by extruding soybean protein and the like. The portion to be measured from these foods or processed foods is cut and the analytical sample is prepared. The size of the analysis sample is preferably such that the contact surface of the plunger, which will be described later, is flat and the size is at least twice the diameter of the plunger. Further, the thickness of the analysis sample is preferably at least 2 mm or more because if it is too thin, the reaction force from the plate on which the analysis sample is placed will be measured when pressed.

2.弾性率及び弾性限界歪みの測定
作製した分析サンプルを単軸の圧縮試験機を用いて分析する。単軸の圧縮試験機は、一定速度で上から下方向に押圧できるものであれば特に限定はない。移動速度は、早すぎると押圧初期の応力を測定することができないため、1.0mm/s以下であればよく、好ましくは、0.5mm/s以下である。また、遅すぎると分析に時間がかかるため、0.05mm/s以上、好ましくは0.1mm/s以上であることが好ましい。
2. Measurement of elastic modulus and elastic limit strain
The prepared analytical sample is analyzed using a uniaxial compression tester. The uniaxial compression tester is not particularly limited as long as it can be pressed from top to bottom at a constant speed. If the moving speed is too fast, the stress at the initial stage of pressing cannot be measured. Therefore, the moving speed may be 1.0 mm / s or less, preferably 0.5 mm / s or less. Further, if it is too late, it takes time for analysis, so it is preferably 0.05 mm / s or more, preferably 0.1 mm / s or more.

分析に使用するプランジャーと呼ばれる押圧知具の材質は特に限定はなく、金属製のものであってもプラスチック製のものであってもよい。プランジャーの食品サンプルと接する部分は円柱形のものが好ましく、径は3〜8mmが好ましい。径が小さすぎると食品を押圧する前に刺さってしまう可能性があり、大きすぎると押圧初期の弾性率の値が低くなるため、食品の食感を評価しづらくなる。 The material of the pressing jig called the plunger used for the analysis is not particularly limited, and may be made of metal or plastic. The portion of the plunger in contact with the food sample is preferably cylindrical, and the diameter is preferably 3 to 8 mm. If the diameter is too small, the food may be stabbed before being pressed, and if it is too large, the elastic modulus at the initial stage of pressing will be low, making it difficult to evaluate the texture of the food.

分析サンプルを単軸の圧縮試験機を用いて上記条件で歪みに対する応力を測定する。測定したデータをY軸が応力、X軸が歪みとなるようにグラフにプロットして、図1で示めすような応力―歪み曲線を作成する。 The stress against strain is measured under the above conditions using a uniaxial compression tester for the analysis sample. The measured data is plotted on a graph so that the Y-axis is the stress and the X-axis is the strain, and a stress-strain curve as shown in FIG. 1 is created.

作成した、応力―歪み曲線から弾性率と弾性限界歪みを算出する。算出方法は、図1で示すように応力の発生時点の歪みの値(S)から応力―歪み曲線に近似直線(L)を引き、この近似線(L)の傾き(K)の値を弾性率とする。また、近似直線(L)上にのる最大の歪みの値(M)から応力の発生時点の歪みの値(S)を引いた値を弾性限界歪みとする。このような分析は、使用する単軸圧縮試験機に付属する解析ソフトを用いることで容易に自動的に算出できる場合がある。また、歪みが大きくなって応力が急激に落ちる前の最大の応力値を一般的な測定項目である破断強度(P)とする。 Calculate the elastic modulus and elastic limit strain from the created stress-strain curve. As shown in FIG. 1, the calculation method is to draw an approximate straight line (L) on the stress-strain curve from the strain value (S) at the time of stress occurrence, and elastically calculate the slope (K) value of this approximate line (L). Let it be a rate. Further, the value obtained by subtracting the strain value (S) at the time of stress generation from the maximum strain value (M) on the approximate straight line (L) is defined as the elastic limit strain. Such an analysis may be easily and automatically calculated by using the analysis software attached to the uniaxial compression tester to be used. Further, the maximum stress value before the strain becomes large and the stress drops sharply is defined as the breaking strength (P), which is a general measurement item.

以下に実施例を挙げて本実施形態をさらに詳細に説明する。 The present embodiment will be described in more detail below with reference to examples.

<実験1>プランジャーの直径について
(試験例1)
厚さ15mmの牛肉(モモ)をスチームオーブンにて内部温度(中央部)を65℃に到達するように加熱し、筋や大きな脂身のない赤身部分を20mm角で切断し、分析サンプル(ミディアム)とした。
<Experiment 1> About the diameter of the plunger (Test Example 1)
Heat 15 mm thick beef (peach) in a steam oven so that the internal temperature (central part) reaches 65 ° C, cut the lean part without streaks and large fat in 20 mm square, and analyze sample (medium). And said.

分析サンプル(ミディアム)を単軸圧縮・引張型レオメータ(RE−33005C、株式会社 山電)を用いて、移動速度 0.5mm/s、最大歪み0.99で単軸等速陥入試験を行った。ロードセルは定格容量19.6Nのもの、プランジャーは円柱型で直径1.5mmのものを使用した。また、分析サンプル(ミディアム)は、筋線維方向に沿って押圧するように測定した。測定は、0.02秒ごとに行い、応力と歪みについて測定した。 A uniaxial constant velocity intrusion test was performed on the analysis sample (medium) using a uniaxial compression / tension rheometer (RE-33005C, Yamaden Co., Ltd.) with a moving speed of 0.5 mm / s and a maximum strain of 0.99. rice field. The load cell used had a rated capacity of 19.6 N, and the plunger used was a cylindrical type with a diameter of 1.5 mm. In addition, the analysis sample (medium) was measured so as to press along the muscle fiber direction. The measurement was performed every 0.02 seconds, and the stress and strain were measured.

(試験例2)
プランジャー径を2mmとする以外は試験例1の方法に従って分析サンプル(ミディアム)を測定した。
(Test Example 2)
The analytical sample (medium) was measured according to the method of Test Example 1 except that the plunger diameter was 2 mm.

(試験例3)
プランジャー径を3mmとする以外は試験例1の方法に従って分析サンプル(ミディアム)を測定した。
(Test Example 3)
The analytical sample (medium) was measured according to the method of Test Example 1 except that the plunger diameter was set to 3 mm.

(試験例4)
プランジャー径を5mmとする以外は試験例1の方法に従って分析サンプル(ミディアム)を測定した。
(Test Example 4)
The analytical sample (medium) was measured according to the method of Test Example 1 except that the plunger diameter was 5 mm.

(試験例5)
プランジャー径を8mmとする以外は試験例1の方法に従って分析サンプル(ミディアム)を測定した。
(Test Example 5)
The analytical sample (medium) was measured according to the method of Test Example 1 except that the plunger diameter was 8 mm.

測定したサンプルの分析データを破断強度解析ソフトウェア(BAS3305、ver2.3)で解析し、応力―歪み曲線(図2)を作成した。分析ブレを見たいため、分析したプロットをすべて表記した。図2で示すように直径が小さいほど応力―歪み曲線の立ち上がり(傾き)が高くなるため、分析感度的に好ましいが、プランジャーの直径1.5mmや2mmの試験(試験例1及び2)では、応力値がばらついて直線状とならないため不適と判断した。逆にプランジャーの直径が8mmの場合(試験例5)、応力―歪み曲線の立ち上がり(傾き)がプランジャーの直径が3mmや5mm(試験例3及び4)と比較して、低いため、これより直径の大きいプランジャーでは分析感度が弱くなると考えられた。よって、プランジャーの直径は3〜8mmが好ましく、より好ましくは3〜5mmであると考える。 The analysis data of the measured sample was analyzed by breaking strength analysis software (BAS3305, ver2.3), and a stress-strain curve (FIG. 2) was created. Since I want to see the analysis blur, I have shown all the analyzed plots. As shown in FIG. 2, the smaller the diameter, the higher the rise (slope) of the stress-strain curve, which is preferable in terms of analytical sensitivity. , It was judged to be unsuitable because the stress value varies and does not become linear. On the contrary, when the diameter of the plunger is 8 mm (Test Example 5), the rise (slope) of the stress-strain curve is lower than that of the plunger diameter of 3 mm or 5 mm (Test Examples 3 and 4). It was thought that the analysis sensitivity would be weaker with a plunger with a larger diameter. Therefore, it is considered that the diameter of the plunger is preferably 3 to 8 mm, more preferably 3 to 5 mm.

<実験2>移動速度について
(試験例6)
プランジャーの移動速度を0.05mm/sとし、測定を0.2秒ごととする以外は、試験例3の方法に従って測定した。
<Experiment 2> Movement speed (Test Example 6)
The measurement was performed according to the method of Test Example 3 except that the moving speed of the plunger was 0.05 mm / s and the measurement was performed every 0.2 seconds.

(試験例7)
プランジャーの移動速度を0.1mm/sとする以外は、試験例6の方法に従って測定した。
(Test Example 7)
The measurement was performed according to the method of Test Example 6 except that the moving speed of the plunger was 0.1 mm / s.

(試験例8)
プランジャーの移動速度を1.0mm/sとする以外は、試験例6の方法に従って測定した。
(Test Example 8)
The measurement was performed according to the method of Test Example 6 except that the moving speed of the plunger was 1.0 mm / s.

(試験例9)
プランジャーの移動速度を5.0mm/sとする以外は、試験例6の方法に従って測定した。
(Test Example 9)
The measurement was performed according to the method of Test Example 6 except that the moving speed of the plunger was 5.0 mm / s.

測定したサンプルの分析データと試験例3のデータを破断強度解析ソフトウェア(BAS3305、ver2.3)で解析し、応力―歪み曲線(図3)を作成した。プロット数が多いため、わかりやすいようにグラフでは、歪みが0.01ごとに応力をプロットした。図3で示すように移動速度が5.0mm/sと速い試験例9では、歪みが大きくなっても応力が立ち上がらないことからがプランジャーが肉に刺さっていることがわかる。移動速度が1.0mm/sである試験例8でも他の試験例と比較して若干立ち上がりが遅いためプランジャーが肉片に刺さり気味で測定しているものと考える。1.0mm/sよりも移動速度の遅い試験区では、立ち上がりの遅さがみられないことからプランジャーが肉に刺さらずにしっかりと測定できていると考える。ただ、0.05mm/sでは、サンプル分析に時間がかかる。よって、プランジャーの移動速度は0.05〜1.0mm/sが好ましく、より好ましくは、0.1〜0.5mm/sと考える。 The analysis data of the measured sample and the data of Test Example 3 were analyzed by breaking strength analysis software (BAS3305, ver2.3), and a stress-strain curve (FIG. 3) was created. Due to the large number of plots, the graph plots the stress every 0.01 strain for clarity. As shown in FIG. 3, in Test Example 9 in which the moving speed is as fast as 5.0 mm / s, it can be seen that the plunger is stuck in the meat because the stress does not rise even if the strain becomes large. Even in Test Example 8 in which the moving speed is 1.0 mm / s, the rise is slightly slower than in the other Test Examples, so it is considered that the plunger is slightly stuck in the meat piece for measurement. In the test plot where the moving speed is slower than 1.0 mm / s, there is no slow rise, so it is considered that the plunger can measure firmly without sticking to the meat. However, at 0.05 mm / s, sample analysis takes time. Therefore, the moving speed of the plunger is preferably 0.05 to 1.0 mm / s, more preferably 0.1 to 0.5 mm / s.

<実験3>肉の食感評価
(実施例1)プランジャー直径8mmでの評価
分析サンプルとして、厚さ15mmの牛肉(モモ)の生の肉(レア)、スチームオーブンにて内部温度(中央部)を65℃に到達するように加熱したサンプル(ミディアム)、チームオーブンにて内部温度(中央部)を80℃に到達するように加熱したサンプル(ウェルダン)、チームオーブンにて内部温度(中央部)を90℃に到達するように加熱したサンプル(ベーリーウェルダン)を用意し、筋や大きな脂身のない赤身部分を20mm角で切断し、分析サンプルとした。
<Experiment 3> Evaluation of meat texture (Example 1) Evaluation with a plunger diameter of 8 mm As an analysis sample, raw meat (rare) of beef (peach) with a thickness of 15 mm and an internal temperature (center part) in a steam oven. ) Was heated to reach 65 ° C (medium), a sample heated to reach 80 ° C internal temperature (central part) in a team oven (weldun), and internal temperature (central part) in a team oven. ) Was heated to reach 90 ° C. (Bary Weldan), and a lean portion without streaks or large fat was cut into 20 mm squares to prepare an analysis sample.

各分析サンプルを単軸圧縮・引張型レオメータ(RE−33005C、株式会社 山電)を用いて、移動速度 0.5mm/s、最大歪み0.99で単軸等速陥入試験を行った。ロードセルは定格容量19.6Nのもの、プランジャーは円柱型で直径8mmのものを使用した。また、分析サンプルは、筋線維方向に沿って押圧するように測定した。測定は、0.2秒ごとに行い、応力と歪みについて測定した。各サンプルともに8試験体分析し、平均値をサンプルの値とした。 Each analytical sample was subjected to a uniaxial constant velocity intrusion test at a moving speed of 0.5 mm / s and a maximum strain of 0.99 using a uniaxial compression / tension rheometer (RE-33005C, Yamaden Co., Ltd.). The load cell had a rated capacity of 19.6 N, and the plunger had a cylindrical shape and a diameter of 8 mm. In addition, the analytical sample was measured so as to press along the muscle fiber direction. The measurement was performed every 0.2 seconds, and the stress and strain were measured. Eight specimens were analyzed for each sample, and the average value was used as the sample value.

測定したサンプルの分析データを破断強度解析ソフトウェア(BAS3305、ver2.3)で解析し、各サンプルの弾性率と弾性限界歪みを測定した。各サンプルの弾性率と弾性限界歪みの値を下記表1に示す。 The analysis data of the measured samples were analyzed by breaking strength analysis software (BAS3305, ver2.3), and the elastic modulus and elastic limit strain of each sample were measured. The elastic modulus and elastic limit strain value of each sample are shown in Table 1 below.

Figure 0006917598
Figure 0006917598

図4は、表1に示したプランジャーの直径が8mmの測定値について、X軸に弾性率、Y軸に弾性限界歪みとし、各サンプルの値をプロットした散布図であるが、肉を加熱することで、弾性限界歪みの値は、変わらないものの弾性率と併せて評価することで肉の食感を評価することが可能である。牛モモ肉の場合は、差が小さいが、もう少し柔らかい肉質のものであれば、より細かい肉の食感の差を評価可能であると考える。 FIG. 4 is a scatter plot in which the values of each sample are plotted with the elastic modulus on the X-axis and the elastic limit strain on the Y-axis for the measured values of the plunger with a diameter of 8 mm shown in Table 1, and the meat is heated. By doing so, it is possible to evaluate the texture of the meat by evaluating the value of the elastic limit strain together with the elastic modulus although it does not change. In the case of beef thigh meat, the difference is small, but if the meat quality is a little softer, it is possible to evaluate the difference in texture of finer meat.

(実施例2)プランジャー直径3mmでの評価
プランジャー直径3mmとする以外は実施例1と同様に各サンプルの分析を行い、各サンプルの弾性率と弾性限界歪みを測定した。各サンプルの弾性率と弾性限界歪みの値を下記表2に示す。
(Example 2) Evaluation with a plunger diameter of 3 mm Each sample was analyzed in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the plunger diameter was 3 mm, and the elastic modulus and elastic limit strain of each sample were measured. The elastic modulus and elastic limit strain value of each sample are shown in Table 2 below.

Figure 0006917598
Figure 0006917598

図5は、プランジャーの直径が3mmの測定値について、X軸に弾性率、Y軸に弾性限界歪みとし、各サンプルの値をプロットした散布図であるが、図4のプランジャーの直径が8mmの図と比較して、弾性限界歪みの値に差が生じ、より細かく肉の食感を評価することが可能である。 FIG. 5 is a scatter plot in which the values of each sample are plotted with the elastic modulus on the X-axis and the elastic limit strain on the Y-axis for the measured values with a plunger diameter of 3 mm. Compared with the figure of 8 mm, there is a difference in the value of the elastic limit strain, and it is possible to evaluate the texture of the meat more finely.

(比較例1)破断強度による測定
移動速度1.0mm/sとする以外は、実施例1の方法で単軸等速陥入試験を行い、得られた応力―歪み曲線における破断点の応力の大きさから破断強度を算出した。各サンプルの破断応力を下記表3に示す。
(Comparative Example 1) A uniaxial constant velocity intrusion test was performed by the method of Example 1 except that the measured moving speed based on the breaking strength was 1.0 mm / s, and the stress obtained-the stress at the breaking point in the strain curve. The breaking strength was calculated from the size. The breaking stress of each sample is shown in Table 3 below.

Figure 0006917598
Figure 0006917598

図6は、比較例1における各サンプルの代表検体について応力―歪み曲線を示したグラフであるが、表3や図6で示すように従来の分析項目である破断強度では、肉の細かい食感について評価することは困難である。 FIG. 6 is a graph showing stress-strain curves for the representative samples of each sample in Comparative Example 1, but as shown in Table 3 and FIG. 6, the breaking strength, which is a conventional analysis item, has a fine texture of meat. Is difficult to evaluate.

Claims (1)

単軸圧縮試験機を用いて、直径が3〜8mmの円柱形のプランジャーを0.05〜1.0mm/sの移動速度で等速移動させ食品を押圧し、弾性率及び弾性限界歪みを分析し、前記弾性率及び前記弾性限界歪みをそれぞれ軸とした2軸グラフにて食品の食感を評価することを特徴とする食品の食感評価方法。

Using a uniaxial compression tester, a cylindrical plunger with a diameter of 3 to 8 mm is moved at a constant speed of 0.05 to 1.0 mm / s to press the food, and the elastic modulus and elastic limit strain are reduced. A method for evaluating the texture of a food, which comprises analyzing and evaluating the texture of the food on a two-axis graph with the elastic modulus and the elastic limit strain as axes.

JP2019055832A 2019-03-25 2019-03-25 Texture evaluation method Active JP6917598B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019055832A JP6917598B2 (en) 2019-03-25 2019-03-25 Texture evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019055832A JP6917598B2 (en) 2019-03-25 2019-03-25 Texture evaluation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020159693A JP2020159693A (en) 2020-10-01
JP6917598B2 true JP6917598B2 (en) 2021-08-11

Family

ID=72642754

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019055832A Active JP6917598B2 (en) 2019-03-25 2019-03-25 Texture evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6917598B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4007632A (en) * 1976-01-29 1977-02-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Apparatus for determining the textural qualities of food
JP2000039430A (en) * 1998-07-22 2000-02-08 Ajinomoto Co Inc Method for measuring collapse of formed rice
CA2665834C (en) * 2006-09-21 2013-04-02 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas Apparatus and method for predicting meat tenderness
JP5311680B2 (en) * 2010-04-01 2013-10-09 長谷川香料株式会社 Method for evaluating food hardness, texture and texture
PL2893341T3 (en) * 2012-09-04 2018-08-31 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Method and apparatus for examining eggs
JP6411065B2 (en) * 2013-06-12 2018-10-24 株式会社ニッピ Broiler feed and method for improving broiler meat quality
JP5450873B1 (en) * 2013-07-29 2014-03-26 株式会社大冷 Method of manufacturing frozen fried food for facility cooking and frozen fried food for facility cooking
JP6199236B2 (en) * 2013-08-02 2017-09-20 日清製粉株式会社 Apparatus for evaluating physical properties of flour dough and method for evaluating physical properties

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020159693A (en) 2020-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Novaković et al. A comparison between Warner-Bratzler shear force measurement and texture profile analysis of meat and meat products: A review
Carter et al. Uniaxial fatigue of human cortical bone. The influence of tissue physical characteristics
Mohsenin et al. USE OF RHEOLOGICAL TERMS AND CORRELATION OF COMPATIBLE MEASUREMENTS IN FOOD TEXTURE RESEARCH 1
Benedito et al. Cheese maturity assessment using ultrasonics
Wang et al. Melting characteristics of cheese: analysis of effects of cooking conditions using computer vision technology
EP1384192A2 (en) System for and method of performing evaluation techniques on a log or round timber
AU2002242023A1 (en) System for and method of performing evaluation techniques on a log or round timber
Kuo et al. A viscoelasticity index for cheese meltability evaluation
Lanvermann et al. Mechanical properties of Norway spruce: intra-ring variation and generic behavior of earlywood and latewood until failure
JP6917598B2 (en) Texture evaluation method
Kamperidou et al. Correlation between the changes of colour and mechanical properties of thermally-modified Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood.
Nedomová et al. Mechanical properties of sugar beet root during storage
WO2022029840A1 (en) Method for evaluating food texture
Madieta et al. Textural properties of fruit affected by experimental conditions in TPA tests: an RSM approach
Rojo et al. Fracture properties of potato crisps
CA2665834C (en) Apparatus and method for predicting meat tenderness
Van Woensel et al. Relation between mechanical properties of apple fruit and sensory quality
Rojo et al. Objective and subjective measurement of the crispness of crisps from four potato varieties
Tjondro et al. Non-linier Compression Stress-strain Curve Model for Hardwood
James et al. Testing meat tenderness using an in situ straining stage with variable pressure scanning electron microscopy
AL-HAQ et al. EFFECT OF DEGREE OF COMPRESSION ON TEXTURE.
Contador et al. Evaluation of textural properties of peach and nectarine through texture profile analysis
Schotsmans et al. Non-destructive firmness measurement of Zespri™ Gold using the acoustic impulse response technique and compression tests
KAMEL et al. SOME FACTORS AFFECTING GELATIN GEL TEXTURE EVALUATION BY PENETRATION TESTING 1
Nedomová Viscoelasticity of Edam cheese during its ripening

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20190325

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20210330

A871 Explanation of circumstances concerning accelerated examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A871

Effective date: 20210330

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20210402

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20210706

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20210709

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6917598

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150