JP6633358B2 - Living environment evaluation device, living environment evaluation system, living environment evaluation method and program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a living environment evaluation device, a living environment evaluation system, a living environment evaluation method, and a program for quantitatively evaluating a local living environment.

  Attempts have been made to quantitatively evaluate the living environment. For example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. H11-163,199 discloses that facilities in a region are evaluated based on the map data, population data, and facility data of the facilities to calculate an evaluation value of a location and a quality of service. An evaluation system is disclosed.

JP-A-2004-287771

  By the way, some users generally have diverse values, such as those who do not place importance on local convenience if the local security is high, and those who value the future rather than the local landscape. It is a target. As described above, in evaluating the living environment, matters that are important to the user may be different from matters that are not so important. However, in the related art, the living environment is evaluated without considering the diversity of the values of the user, and the evaluation result may not match the values of the user.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and has as its object to provide a living environment evaluation device, a living environment evaluation system, and a living environment evaluation method capable of performing a living environment evaluation that reflects a user's sense of the living environment. And to provide programs.

The problem is that an acquiring unit that acquires a value of a plurality of data items related to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and a value of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions within a predetermined value range. Conversion means for converting the value into one of the step values; setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input by a user; and a predetermined evaluation for each of the plurality of regions. Evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion means for a data item associated with a criterion and a weight set by the setting means; and and output means for outputting the evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by means, a plurality of tape describing the plurality of living environment on regional scenarios And a storage unit for storing information of data items associated with the plurality of texts, wherein the setting unit is configured to perform a setting based on a data item associated with a text selected by a user from the plurality of texts. The living environment evaluation device is characterized in that each weight of the plurality of data items is set .

According to the above living environment evaluation device, the living environment in a plurality of regions is evaluated in a predetermined manner based on both the published objective data and the weight of the items that the user places importance on the living environment. Can be evaluated quantitatively with respect to criteria. This makes it possible to obtain a highly reliable evaluation result of the living environment of the area to be evaluated while reflecting the user's sense of the living environment.
Further, by performing the above, the plurality of areas can be quantitatively evaluated in consideration of a future scenario of the living environment selected by the user with respect to the plurality of areas. At this time, since the user can set the scenario of the living environment by selecting a desired text from the text describing the scenario, the labor for setting the scenario can be reduced.
In the above-mentioned living environment evaluation device, the storage unit stores a data item and a degree of importance of the data item in association with each other for the plurality of texts, and the setting unit associates the data item with the selected text. The weight of each of the plurality of data items may be set based on the importance of the data item.
This makes it possible to adjust the importance of the data items relating to the living environment when the scenario is selected, according to the future scenario of the living environment. That is, according to the above configuration, it is possible to set the importance of the data item relating to the living environment to an appropriate value according to the scenario selected by the user.
In addition, the problem is that an acquiring unit that acquires values of a plurality of data items related to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and that a value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions is a predetermined value. Conversion means for converting the value into any of the step values in the area, setting means for setting weights for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input by a user, and a predetermined value for each of the plurality of areas. Evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on the step value converted by the conversion means for the data item associated with the evaluation criterion and the weight set by the setting means; Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the value calculation means; and storing data items and importance in association with the keyword. Keyword setting means, the setting means searches for a keyword stored in the keyword storage means from a text input by the user, and sets a data item and importance stored in association with the searched keyword. Based on the above, the weight is set for each of the plurality of data items.
By doing so, the importance of the data items relating to the living environment can be adjusted based on the text in which the user freely describes the living environment. That is, according to the above configuration, the values of the user can be flexibly reflected in the evaluation of the local living environment.

In the living environment evaluation device described above, the output unit may output a comparison result of comparing the plurality of regions based on an evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit for each of the plurality of regions. .
By doing so, it is possible to provide a comparison result of comparing a plurality of regions with a predetermined evaluation criterion. That is, according to the above configuration, comparison of a plurality of regions based on a predetermined evaluation criterion becomes easy.

In the above-mentioned living environment evaluation device, the evaluation value calculation means may include, for each of the plurality of areas, a step value converted by the conversion means for a data item associated with each of a plurality of evaluation criteria, and the setting means. Based on the set weight, an evaluation value of each of the plurality of evaluation criteria is calculated, and the output unit calculates, for at least one of the plurality of areas, each of the plurality of evaluation criteria. An evaluation result based on the evaluation value may be output.
In this way, the local living environment can be evaluated from multiple viewpoints. That is, according to the above configuration, a comprehensive evaluation result of the living environment in the area can be provided.

In the above living environment evaluation device, the setting unit may set the weight of each of the plurality of data items according to the degree of importance selected by the user for each of the plurality of data items.
By doing so, the user can directly set the importance for each of the data items related to the living environment, so that the items that the user places importance on can be accurately reflected in the evaluation of the local living environment.

In the above-described living environment evaluation device, an evaluation item storage unit that stores data items in association with a plurality of evaluation items related to the living environment, a life stage of the user, and an evaluation item selected by the user from among the plurality of evaluation items; Answer information acquiring means for acquiring answer information including importance, importance setting means for setting each importance of the plurality of evaluation items for each of the life stages based on the answer information, For each of the regions, based on the importance of each of the plurality of evaluation items set for each of the life stages and the stage value and weight of the data item associated with each of the plurality of evaluation items, Further comprising: a life stage-specific evaluation value calculating means for calculating an evaluation value for each life stage, wherein the output means comprises: Good as it outputs the evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by another evaluation value calculating means.
In this way, the local living environment can be evaluated in consideration of the user's life stage. That is, according to the above-described configuration, the area can be quantitatively evaluated in consideration of the matters that the user places importance on the living environment and the life stage of the user.

In addition, the above-described problem is achieved by acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items relating to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and setting values of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions to a predetermined value. Conversion means for converting to any of the step values in the value range, setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user, and for each of the plurality of regions, An evaluation value calculation unit configured to calculate an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion unit and a weight set by the setting unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; and output means for outputting the evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means, and describing the plurality of living environment on regional scenarios A plurality of text, and a storage means for storing information of data items associated with the said plurality of text, the setting means, the data items associated with the text selected by the user from the plurality of text based on, it is solved by the living environment evaluation system, characterized in that you set the respective weight of the plurality of data items.
In addition, the above-described problem is achieved by acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items relating to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and setting values of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions to a predetermined value. Conversion means for converting to any of the step values in the value range, setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user, and for each of the plurality of regions, An evaluation value calculation unit configured to calculate an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion unit and a weight set by the setting unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; An output unit for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit; and a data item and importance recorded in association with the keyword. Keyword setting means, wherein the setting means searches for a keyword stored in the keyword storage means from text input by the user, and stores a data item and importance stored in association with the searched keyword. Based on the above, the weight is set for each of the plurality of data items.

Further, the above-described problem is that an acquisition step in which a computer acquires values of a plurality of data items relating to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and a value of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions. Is converted into any of the step values within a predetermined value range, a setting step of setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user, An evaluation value calculating step of calculating an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion step and a weight set by the setting step for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; And an output step of outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation step. A plurality of text describing the plurality of living environment on regional scenario, running, a storage step of storing information of a data item associated for the plurality of text in said setting step, from said plurality of text The problem is solved by a living environment evaluation method , wherein a weight of each of the plurality of data items is set based on a data item associated with a text selected by a user .
Further, the above-described problem is that an acquisition step in which a computer acquires values of a plurality of data items relating to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and a value of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions. Is converted into any of the step values within a predetermined value range, a setting step of setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user, An evaluation value calculating step of calculating an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion step and a weight set by the setting step for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; And an output step of outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation step. Executing a keyword storage step of storing a data item and a degree of importance in association with a keyword, wherein in the setting step, a keyword stored in the keyword storage step is searched from text input by the user, and the search is performed. The weight is set for each of the plurality of data items based on the data items stored in association with the keyword and the degree of importance.

In addition, the above-described problem is achieved by acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items relating to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and setting values of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions to a predetermined value. Conversion means for converting to any of the step values in the value range, setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user, and for each of the plurality of regions, An evaluation value calculation unit configured to calculate an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion unit and a weight set by the setting unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; and output means for outputting the evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means, and describing the plurality of living environment on regional scenarios A program for causing a computer to function as storage means for storing a plurality of texts and information of data items associated with the plurality of texts, wherein the setting means comprises a text selected by the user from the plurality of texts. The weight is set for each of the plurality of data items based on the data items associated with the data items .
In addition, the above-described problem is achieved by acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items relating to a living environment published for each of a plurality of regions, and setting values of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions to a predetermined value. Conversion means for converting to any of the step values in the value range, setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user, and for each of the plurality of regions, An evaluation value calculation unit configured to calculate an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion unit and a weight set by the setting unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; An output unit for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit; and a data item and importance recorded in association with the keyword. A program for causing a computer to function as keyword storage means, wherein the setting means searches for a keyword stored in the keyword storage means from text input by the user, and stores the keyword in association with the searched keyword. The weight of each of the plurality of data items is set on the basis of the data items to be processed and the degree of importance.

  According to the living environment evaluation device, the living environment evaluation system, the living environment evaluation method, and the program according to the present invention, a highly reliable evaluation of the living environment of the area to be evaluated is performed while reflecting the values of the user to the living environment. The result can be obtained.

It is a hardware block diagram of a living environment evaluation apparatus. It is a functional block diagram of a living environment evaluation device. It is a figure showing an example of an evaluation standard information table. It is a figure showing an example of an announcement data storage table. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a scenario information table. It is a figure showing an example of an importance setting table. It is a figure showing an example of an evaluation item information table. It is a figure showing an example of an answer information table. It is a figure which shows an example of the importance information table according to a life stage. It is a flowchart explaining the whole flow of a living environment evaluation process. It is a flowchart of the input reception processing of announcement data. It is a flowchart of the input reception process of a future scenario. It is a flowchart of the input reception process of the evaluation item for every life stage. It is a flowchart of the process which calculates the evaluation value of a living environment. It is a figure showing an example of a menu screen. It is a figure showing an example of an announcement data input screen. It is a figure showing an example of an important item input screen. It is a figure showing an example of a future scenario selection screen. It is a figure showing an example of a life stage input screen. It is a figure showing an example of the most important item selection screen. It is a figure showing an example of an important item selection screen. It is a figure showing an example of a comprehensive evaluation screen. It is a figure showing an example of a comparison result screen. It is a figure showing the future scenario input screen concerning the 1st modification. It is a figure showing the future scenario input screen concerning the 2nd modification. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a keyword information table.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention (hereinafter, this embodiment) will be described with reference to FIGS. The embodiments described below are intended to facilitate understanding of the present invention, and do not limit the present invention. That is, the present invention can be changed and improved without departing from the spirit thereof, and the present invention naturally includes equivalents thereof.

  In this embodiment, for each of a plurality of regions, an acquisition unit for acquiring values (publicized data) of a plurality of data items relating to a published living environment, and a value of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions Is converted into any of the step values in a predetermined value range, setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input by a user, and Evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion based on a step value converted by the conversion means and a weight set by the setting means for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion; And an output unit that outputs evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit.

  The living environment evaluation device according to the present embodiment is used as a reference when selecting a region in which a user lives, as a reference, a comparison result of comparing the living environment of a plurality of regions with various standards, and information such as advantages and disadvantages of the local living environment. Is presented. Here, in the living environment evaluation based solely on data published about the area, the same evaluation result is presented to every user. The prediction of the future is different, and the living environment evaluation device according to the present embodiment aims to evaluate the local living environment in consideration of the values of the user.

  Specifically, the living environment evaluation device according to the present embodiment assigns weights to each of the plurality of data items based on a future scenario selected by the user according to the user's values and future prediction regarding the future living environment. Set. Then, the living environment evaluation device evaluates each of the living environments in a plurality of regions based on the published objective data (publicized data) and the weight of each set data item according to the evaluation criteria. . Note that, by changing the future scenario selected by the user, the evaluation result of the living environment changes.

  In addition, the living environment evaluation device according to the present embodiment sets a weight for each evaluation item based on an answer to an evaluation item that the user attaches importance to the living environment for each life stage, and based on the set weight, a local area value is set. Evaluate the fitness for each life stage. Hereinafter, details of the configuration and functions provided in the living environment evaluation device according to the present embodiment in order to realize the above processing will be described.

[1. Description of Hardware Configuration of Living Environment Evaluation Apparatus 10]
FIG. 1 shows a hardware configuration diagram of a living environment evaluation device 10 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the living environment evaluation device 10 is composed of a computer, and includes a control unit 11, a storage unit 12, an output interface 13, and an input interface 14.

  The control unit 11 includes, for example, a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit), executes various arithmetic processes based on programs and data stored in the storage unit 12, and controls each unit of the living environment evaluation device 10. I do.

  The storage unit 12 includes, for example, a memory and a magnetic disk device, and stores various programs and data, and also functions as a work memory of the control unit 11. The storage unit 12 may include an information storage medium such as a flash memory and an optical disk.

  The output interface 13 outputs information to a device connected to the living environment evaluation device 10. The output interface 13 includes a graphic card, for example, and is connected to a display device 15 such as a liquid crystal display device. Then, the output interface 13 outputs the graphic data generated by the control unit 11 to the display device 15, and causes the display device 15 to display a screen based on the graphic data.

  The input interface 14 receives input of information from a device connected to the living environment evaluation device 10. The input interface 14 is connected to an input device 16 such as a keyboard and a mouse, and receives an input of user operation information from the input device 16.

  Note that the hardware configuration of the living environment evaluation device 10 is not limited to the above-described example. For example, the display device 15 and the input device 16 may be built in the living environment evaluation device 10, or may further include a communication unit, a reading unit and a writing unit of an information storage medium, and the like.

[2. Description of Function of Living Environment Evaluation Apparatus 10]
FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram illustrating an example of functions provided in the living environment evaluation device 10. As shown in FIG. 2, the living environment evaluation device 10 includes a data storage unit 20, a public data acquisition unit 22, a conversion unit 24, a weight setting unit 26, an evaluation value calculation unit 28, a response information acquisition unit 30, an evaluation item important A degree setting unit 32, an evaluation value calculating unit 34 for each life stage, and an output unit 36 are provided.

  The functions of the above-described units provided in the living environment evaluation device 10 are performed by the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 operating each unit of the living environment evaluation device 10 based on a program stored in the storage unit 12. It is realized. Note that the living environment evaluation device 10 may read the above program from an information storage medium, or may download the program via a communication network by a communication unit. Hereinafter, the function of each unit provided in the living environment evaluation device 10 will be described in detail.

[2.1. Data storage unit 20]
The data storage unit 20 is mainly realized by the storage unit 12, and stores various data related to the living environment evaluation processing. For example, in the present embodiment, the data storage unit 20 includes an evaluation criterion information table 20A, a published data storage table 20B, a scenario information table 20C, an item importance setting table 20D, an evaluation item information table 20E, an answer information table 20F, And a life stage-specific importance information table 20G. Hereinafter, the details of each of the above tables will be described.

  The evaluation criterion information table 20A is a table that stores evaluation criteria for evaluating living environments in a plurality of regions and information on data items corresponding to the evaluation criteria. In the present embodiment, a plurality of evaluation standards are defined, and each evaluation standard may be determined in advance in consideration of the points required by both the business and the consumer / resident for the living environment. Further, in the present embodiment, each evaluation criterion is further subdivided, and a plurality of subgroups (referred to as middle items) are set for each evaluation criterion. Each subgroup is associated with a data item published about a region.

  FIG. 3 shows an example of the evaluation criterion information table 20A. As shown in FIG. 3, in the present embodiment, “safety”, “life and convenience”, “cityscape / space”, “town sustainability / development”, “green / environmental consideration”, “maintenance” Six evaluation criteria of “management” are set.

  The above evaluation criteria are based on the “Guidelines on Living Environment of Detached Housing Estates” formulated by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (1: Safety (crime prevention, traffic, disaster prevention), 2: Life (parks, convenience facilities, Barrier-free), 3: Cityscape (space, green, landscape), 4: Area management (cityscape rules, management system, earth-friendly), and evaluation items for multi-family housing (1: Location, 2: Living environment, 3) : Living (common part), 4: Living (dwelling unit), 5: maintenance and management, and indicators of the WHO (World Health Organization) 's Five Philosophy of Living Environment (1: safety, 2: Health, 3: convenience, 4: comfort, 5: sustainability).

Further, a plurality of middle items each associated with one or more data items are set for each evaluation criterion. For example, the middle items set for each evaluation criterion are as follows.
The middle items set in “safety” are “security”, “traffic”, and “disaster prevention”.
The middle items set in “life / convenience” are “medical / welfare / education facilities”, “access”, and “living environment”.
The middle items set in “Streetscape / Space” are “Streetscape Harmony” and “Spaciousness”.
The middle items set in "Sustainability and development of the city" are "Urban power", "Community", and "Future / Sustainability".
The middle items set in "Green / Environmental consideration" are "Green / natural space" and "Energy saving".
The middle items set in “Maintenance” are “shared space” and “management system”.

  Each medium item is associated with one or more data items published by, for example, a public institution. Each data item has a value. Specifically, assuming that the area to be evaluated is 23 wards of Tokyo, the values of the above data items for each of the 23 wards are the municipal annual report of the Tokyo ward, the Metropolitan Police Agency, the Tokyo Fire Department, the post office, -Collected from data published on land statistics surveys, websites of Tokyo wards, and websites of local governments.

  To give an example, the data items associated with the middle item "security" in the evaluation criterion "safety" are "number of deaths", "number of criminal offenses", "situation of street light", " "Number", "total number of ordinary households living in self-locking apartment houses", and "number of items for children's safety and security measures". For each data item, the published value is determined for each region.

In this embodiment, an ID for identifying each of the evaluation criterion, the medium item, and the data item is assigned. Specifically, the ID of each of the six evaluation criteria is D _i (i is any integer from 1 to 6). The evaluation criteria _{D i} is set to j (j is an integer of 1 or more) was th ID entry in the _{D ij,} k (k is an integer of 1 or more) th set in middle item _{D ij} further _Let the ID of the data item be _Dijk .

  The published data storage table 20B is a table that stores published data items and their values for each of a plurality of regions to be evaluated. The data items stored in the publication data storage table 20B correspond to the data items shown in FIG. In the present embodiment, the data stored in the publication data storage table 20B is acquired by a publication data acquisition unit 22 described later based on the input data of the user. The publication data storage table 20B may be copied and acquired from the information storage medium storing the information 20B.

  FIG. 4 shows an example of the publication data storage table 20B. As shown in FIG. 4, the publication data storage table 20 </ b> B stores the publication data (i is any one of 1 to N) for each of a plurality of regions (the number of regions is, for example, N (two or more natural numbers)). The published data table of the i-th region is assumed to be 20B-i). Each table stores a data item (contents) and a value of the data item in association with an ID for identifying the data item.

  The scenario information table 20C stores a plurality of scenarios that can be selected by the user as future scenarios of the living environment, and information on the importance of data items set when each scenario is selected.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the scenario information table 20C includes a scenario ID for identifying the scenario, text describing the content of the scenario, data items related to the scenario, and selection flag information indicating whether or not the scenario has been selected. Are stored in association with each other. In the data item related to the scenario, information on the importance set when the scenario is selected (in the example shown in FIG. 5, the value of the importance is shown in parentheses). They are stored in association with each other. Specifically, according to the example shown in FIG. 5, when the scenario ID “S1” is selected, “2” is assigned to the importance of the data item “number of deaths”, and “the number of criminal offenses” Is set to “4”, and “5” is set to the importance of “street light installation status”. The information stored in the scenario information table 20C may be determined in advance.

  The item importance setting table 20D is a table that stores the respective importance of the middle item included in the evaluation criterion and the data items included in the middle item.

  FIG. 6A shows a medium item importance setting table 20D-1 storing the importance of medium items, and FIG. 6B shows a data item importance setting table 20D storing the importance of data items. -2 was indicated.

  The importance set for the middle item corresponds to the contribution rate of the middle item included in one evaluation criterion. For example, the importance is assigned to each of the middle items so that the sum of the importance of the middle items included in one evaluation criterion becomes a predetermined value (for example, 10). In the present embodiment, the importance assigned to each of the middle items included in one evaluation criterion is determined based on the selection from the user. However, the present invention is not limited to this. Alternatively, a predetermined importance may be assigned.

  In addition, importance levels set to the data items are, for example, six levels from 1 to 6, and are set based on a scenario selected from the scenarios stored in the above-described scenario information table 20C. Note that an initial value may be defined for the importance of the data item, and the initial value may be updated based on the data item and the importance associated with the selected scenario.

  The evaluation item information table 20E stores the evaluation items for the living environment and the information of the data items corresponding to the evaluation items in association with each other. The evaluation items are items that are presented to the user in a questionnaire on matters that the user places importance on the living environment, and are different from the evaluation criteria described above. For example, the above evaluation items may correspond to the evaluation items of the comprehensive survey on living life conducted by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. In addition, the result of answer to the above-mentioned evaluation item may be obtained based on the result of the comprehensive living and living survey conducted by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

  FIG. 7 shows an example of the evaluation item information table 20E. As shown in FIG. 7, the evaluation item information table 20E stores an evaluation item ID for identifying the evaluation item, the contents of the evaluation item, and data items corresponding to the evaluation item in association with each other.

  In the present embodiment, the living environment evaluation device 10 presents a list of a plurality of evaluation items included in the evaluation item information table 20E to the user, and selects the evaluation item that the user gives the most importance from among the presented evaluation items. Then, the answer of the evaluation item to be emphasized next is received together with the information on the life stage of the user. Then, the living environment evaluation device 10 stores the answer information received from the user in an answer information table 20F described later.

  The answer information table 20F is a table that stores the user's answer information on the evaluation items. Note that the answer information stored in the answer information table 20F is acquired by the answer information acquiring unit 30 described later.

  FIG. 8 shows an example of the answer information table 20F. As shown in FIG. 8, the response information table 20F includes a response ID for identifying the response information, a life stage of the respondent, the most important item that is the evaluation item that the respondent considered the most important, and the most important item of the respondent. Next, the information of each of the important items which are regarded as important next is stored. The above-mentioned life stage may be set, for example, by assigning a user to one of a plurality of predetermined life stages based on personal information of the user.

  Specifically, the life stages include L1 (single (under 35)), L2 (couple (household owner is 65 or older)), L3 (parent and child (firstborn is 5 or younger)), L4 (parent And a child (the first child is 18 to 24 years old).

  The life stage-specific importance information table 20G is a table that stores the importance of the evaluation items for each life stage. The information stored in the life stage importance information table 20G is set by an evaluation item importance setting unit 32 described later based on the answer information stored in the answer information table 20F.

FIG. 9 shows an example of the life stage-specific importance information table 20G. As shown in FIG. 9, a life stage ID for identifying a life stage, details of the life stage, and information on the importance of each evaluation item in the life stage are stored in association with each other in the life stage importance information table 20G. . For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 9, it is assumed that there are n (n is an integer of 2 or more) evaluation items, and for an i-th (i is an integer of 1 or more) life stage _Li , an evaluation item j (j Represents the 1-n) th importance as γ _ij .

[2.2. Published data acquisition unit 22]
The publication data acquisition unit 22 is mainly realized by the control unit 11, the storage unit 12, and the input interface 14, and acquires values of data items of a plurality of regions. For example, the published data acquisition unit 22 receives, via the input interface 14, values of data items input by the user for each region using the input device 16, and registers the values of the received data items in the published data storage table 20B. . That is, when the published data acquisition unit 22 acquires the value of the data item for the ith (i is an integer from 1 to N) region, the published data acquisition unit 22 stores the data item value in the 20B-i table of the published data storage table 20B. , Register the value of the data item.

  Also, the public data acquisition unit 22 may acquire public data without input by the user. For example, the publication data acquisition unit 22 may access a database or a storage medium that stores the publication data and acquire the publication data.

[2.3. Conversion unit 24]
The conversion unit 24 is mainly implemented by the control unit 11 and the storage unit 12, and converts the value of each data item in a plurality of regions into one of the step values within a predetermined value range. Hereinafter, an example of the conversion processing by the conversion unit 24 will be described.

  First, the conversion unit 24 normalizes the value of each data item of a plurality of regions. Specifically, the values of the data items are converted into values per unit area, unit household, unit population, and unit population density.

Next, the conversion unit 24 converts the data item j (j is an integer of 1 or more) of the i-th (i is an integer of 1 to N) region based on the normalized value of the data item of each region. The deviation value x _ij is calculated by, for example, the following equation (1).
_{x ij = 50 + 10 · e} j · (U ij -U a) / σ j (1)

In the above (1), e _j has a value of 1 or -1, if the evaluation as the value of the data item increases becomes high 1, when the evaluation as more becomes lower and -1. For example, when evaluating security properties, e _{j =} -1 next time this for evaluation is low enough to "penal code incidence" is increased, whereas evaluation greater the "installation situation of street lights" is increased higher order and _e j = 1 at this time.

In the above formula (1), U _ij is a normalized data value, U _a is an average value (of the normalized values) of data items j in all regions, and σ _j is a standard deviation. It is.

Then, the conversion unit 24 converts the deviation value x _ij into one of a plurality of levels of evaluation based on, for example, the following criteria. The following criterion is merely an example, and another criterion may be used.
Evaluation 1 when x _ij <40
Evaluation 2 when 40 ≦ x _ij <45
Evaluation 3 when 45 ≦ x _ij <50
Evaluation 4 when 50 ≦ x _ij <55
Evaluation 5 when 55 ≦ x _ij <60
Evaluation 6 when 60 ≦ x _ij

Further, the conversion unit 24 calculates the evaluation of the value of the data item of each region by using the calculation method of the importance coefficient in the AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process). For example, when the evaluations 1 to 6 are handled on a fixed interval scale, each evaluation is converted into, for example, the following weight coefficient (hereinafter, referred to as a deviation weight value). The following criterion is merely an example, and another criterion may be used.
Weight coefficient (deviation weight value) w1 for evaluation 1 = 0.022
Evaluation 2 weighting coefficient (deviation weight value) w2 = 0.038
Evaluation 3 weight coefficient (deviation weight value) w3 = 0.0072
Weight coefficient (deviation weight value) of evaluation 4 w4 = 0.137
Weight coefficient (deviation weight value) of evaluation 5 w5 = 0.258
Weight coefficient (deviation weight value) w6 of evaluation 6 = 0.472

  Through the above processing, the conversion unit 24 converts the value of the data item of each region into a corresponding weight coefficient (deviation weight value).

[2.4. Weight setting unit 26]
The weight setting unit 26 is mainly implemented by the control unit 11 and the storage unit 12, and sets weights for data items in a plurality of regions based on weight setting conditions input by a user.

  In the following description, the weight setting condition is a future scenario (a scenario describing the future of the living environment common to a plurality of regions) in which the importance of the data item is associated. Information that directly specifies the importance of the item may be used. In the former case, for each future scenario, a data item and an importance are associated with each other, and the importance of each data item is determined based on the data item and the importance associated with the future scenario selected by the user. Is set. Hereinafter, the weight setting process performed by the weight setting unit 26 will be described in detail.

  The weight setting unit 26 sets a weight for each of the middle items and the data items based on the information stored in the item importance setting table 20D.

That is, the weight setting unit 26 sets the middle item D _ij (j is an integer of 1 or more) included in the evaluation criterion _Di (i = 1 to any integer from 1 to 6) stored in the middle item importance setting table 20D-1. the importance w _ij) of a value obtained by dividing the total value W of the weight of the items among all included in the evaluation criteria D _i, is set as the weighting factor of the middle item D _ij.

Next, the weight setting unit 26 calculates the importance of each data item stored in the data item importance setting table 20D-2 by using the method of calculating the importance coefficient in the AHP method. For example, when the importance levels 1 to 6 are handled on a fixed interval scale, each importance level is converted into, for example, the following weight coefficient (hereinafter, referred to as an item weight value). The following criterion is merely an example, and another criterion may be used.
Weight coefficient (item weight value) of importance 1 w1 = 0.022
Weight coefficient (item weight value) of importance 2 w2 = 0.038
Weight coefficient (item weight value) of importance 3 w3 = 0.0072
Weight coefficient (item weight value) of importance 4 w4 = 0.137
Weighting coefficient (item weight value) of importance 5 w5 = 0.258
Weight coefficient (item weight value) of importance 6 w6 = 0.472

[2.5. Evaluation value calculation unit 28]
The evaluation value calculation unit 28 is mainly realized by the control unit 11 and the storage unit 12, and calculates an evaluation value of each evaluation criterion for each of a plurality of regions. For example, the evaluation value calculation unit 28 calculates the evaluation score of each evaluation criterion for an arbitrary one of a plurality of regions as follows.

First, the evaluation value calculation unit 28 determines, for the target area A, the j-th (j is an integer of 1 or more) middle item D _ij included in the evaluation criterion _Di (i is an integer of 1 to 6). The score P _ij is calculated by the following equation (2).

Here, in the above equation (2), the deviation weight value of the k-th data item D _ijk (k is an integer equal to or greater than 1 and the upper limit is n) included in the middle item D _ij is X _ijk , and the item weight value is α _ijk .

Then, evaluation value calculating section 28, a score _{P i} criteria _{D i} is calculated by the following equation (3).

Here, in the above equation (3), β _ij (j is an integer of 1 or more and the maximum value m) is the weight of the middle item D _ij .

For the area A, a score is calculated for each evaluation criterion of D _{1 to} D ₆ . Similarly, to calculate the score for each of the evaluation criteria D ₁ to D ₆ for the other areas.

  Then, the evaluation value calculation unit 28 calculates, for each evaluation criterion, the average of the scores of all the regions, and sets the deviation between the score of each region and the average as the evaluation value of each region.

[2.6. Answer information acquisition unit 30]
The response information acquisition unit 30 is mainly implemented by the control unit 11, the storage unit 12, and the input interface 14, and acquires response information including an evaluation item selected by the user and importance from a plurality of evaluation items related to the living environment. .

  For example, the living environment evaluation device 10 may cause the display device 15 to display a list including a plurality of evaluation items stored in the evaluation item information table 20E. Then, the answer information acquisition unit 30 receives, via the input interface 14, the evaluation item selected by the user as the most important from the displayed list and the evaluation item selected next as the most important by the input device 16. It is good. Then, the response information acquisition unit 30 may register information (for example, an identifier) of the received evaluation item in the response information table 20F.

  In addition, the response information may include personal information for specifying the life stage of the user who is the respondent. For example, the personal information may include the user's age, gender, living style, number of households, number of children living together, age of children living together, and the like.

[2.7. Evaluation item importance setting section 32]
The evaluation item importance setting unit 32 is implemented mainly by the control unit 11 and the storage unit 12, and based on the response information obtained by the response information obtaining unit 30, sets the importance of each of the plurality of evaluation items for each life stage. Set. For example, the evaluation item importance setting unit 32 may set the importance of each of the plurality of evaluation items as follows.

First, the evaluation item importance setting unit 32 sets an evaluation item V _ij (j is an integer equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value: evaluation item) for a certain life stage L _i (i is an integer of 1 or more and the maximum value is the number of life stages). The importance γ _ij of the number is calculated by the following equation (4).
γ _ij = a ₁ · C _1j / S _1j + a ₂ · C _2j / S _2j (4)

In the above formula (4), S _1j is the answer cumulative number of the most important items in the life stage L _i, S _2j is the answer cumulative number of important items in the life stage L _i. Further, _{a 1} and _{a 2} are coefficients, for example, _{a 1} and _{a 2} have the relationship of the following equation (5).
a ₁ = a ₂ · S ₂ / S ₁ (5)

In the above formula (5), S ₁ is the answer cumulative number of the most important item in all answer information, S ₂ is the answer cumulative number of important items in all answer information.

[2.8. Life stage-based evaluation value calculation unit 34]
The life stage-specific evaluation value calculation unit 34 is mainly realized by the control unit 11 and the storage unit 12, and calculates an evaluation value for each life stage for each of a plurality of regions. For example, the life stage-specific evaluation value calculation unit 34 calculates an evaluation value of an arbitrary life stage for an arbitrary one of a plurality of regions as follows.

Life Stage evaluation value calculating unit 34 calculates by Equation (6) below grade _{Q i} of respect regional A evaluation items _V i (i = _1~t (t is ratings item)). Here, the data item associated with the endpoint V _i is identified by the evaluation item information table 20E, here, the data item j (j = 1~u (u is the number of data items of evaluation items V _i)).

In the above equation (6), X _j is a deviation weight value of data item j, and α _j is an item weight value.

Next, the evaluation value calculating unit 34 for each life stage calculates an evaluation value R _k for the life stage L _k (k is an integer of 1 or more) of the area A by the following equation (7).

In the above formula (7), gamma _ki is the importance of the evaluation item V _i in the life stage L _k which is set by the evaluation item importance setting unit 32.

[2.9. Output unit 36]
The output unit 36 is mainly realized by the control unit 11, the storage unit 12, and the output interface 13, and outputs evaluation information based on the evaluation values calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit 28 and the life stage-specific evaluation value calculation unit 34. .

  For example, the output unit 36 displays, via the output interface 13, an evaluation result screen that comprehensively evaluates the living environment based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit 28 for each evaluation criterion in the area for one area. The information may be displayed on the display device 15. Further, for example, the output unit 36 outputs a comparison result screen obtained by comparing the evaluation criteria calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit 28 for each of a plurality of regions for one evaluation criterion to the display device 15 via the output interface 13. It may be displayed and output. Further, for example, the output unit 36 displays and outputs an evaluation result screen based on the evaluation value for each life stage calculated by the life stage-specific evaluation value calculation unit 34 for one area to the display device 15 via the output interface 13. It may be that.

[3. Description of Process Executed by Living Environment Evaluation Apparatus 10]
Next, the living environment evaluation processing executed by the living environment evaluation device 10 will be specifically described based on FIGS.

  FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating the overall flow of the living environment evaluation process. As shown in FIG. 10, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the display device 15 to display the menu screen 40 via the output interface 13 (S100). Here, an example of the menu screen 40 will be described with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 15, the menu screen 40 includes a published data input icon 40A, a future scenario input icon 40B, an evaluation item input icon 40C for each life stage, and a living environment evaluation icon 40D.

  The public data input icon 40A is an icon for proceeding to a screen for inputting public data of each of a plurality of regions to be evaluated. The future scenario input icon 40B is an icon for proceeding to a screen for inputting a future scenario of a living environment common to a plurality of areas to be evaluated. The life stage-specific evaluation item input icon 40C is an icon for proceeding to a screen for inputting an evaluation item for each life stage. The living environment evaluation icon 40D is an icon for proceeding to a screen for outputting an evaluation result obtained by evaluating each of the living environments in a plurality of areas to be evaluated based on the input information.

  As shown in FIG. 10, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives the selection of the published data input icon 40A from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S102), the control unit 11 performs a process of receiving the published data input. Execute (S104).

  Here, the input data reception processing of S104 will be described based on the flowchart shown in FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 11, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives an input of an area to which data is to be input from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S200). Then, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the display device 15 to display the announcement data input screen 42 for the received area via the output interface 13 (S202). Here, an example of the announcement data input screen 42 will be described with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 16, the published data input screen 42 displays an evaluation criterion, a middle item included in the evaluation criterion, and a data item included in the middle item, and a value is assigned to each data item. An input field 42A for inputting is provided.

  As shown in FIG. 11, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives information input of each data item from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 based on the input on the published data input screen 42 (S204). ). Then, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 does not receive the pressing of the determination icon 42B of the publication data input screen 42 from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S206: N), the control unit 11 continues S204. I do. On the other hand, when the press of the determination icon 42B is received (S206: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 stores the data in the public data storage table 20B based on the data input to the public data input screen 42. The published data is registered in a table corresponding to the input target area (S208).

  When there is another area to be input (S210: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 returns to S200, and when there is no other area to be input (S210: N). Then, the input data acceptance processing is ended.

  Here, the description is continued by returning to the flowchart of FIG. 10 again. As shown in FIG. 10, when receiving the selection of the future scenario input icon 40 </ b> B from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S 106), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 performs a future scenario input reception process. Execute (S108).

  Here, the input reception processing of the future scenario in S108 will be described based on the flowchart shown in FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 12, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the display device 15 to display the important item input screen 44 via the output interface 13 (S300). The priority item input screen 44 is a screen for setting which of the middle items of the evaluation criteria the middle item should be valued by the evaluator in the future of the living environment of the area to be evaluated. Here, an example of the important item input screen 44 will be described with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 17, the evaluation criteria and each of the middle items included in the evaluation criteria are displayed on the important item input screen 44, and a step value for setting the degree of importance of each of the middle items is set. A check box 44A is provided. In the example shown in FIG. 17, the importance of each medium item can be set in ten stages from emphasis to non-emphasis. It should be noted that the values that can be set for the importance of each medium item are limited so that the total importance of each medium item included in one evaluation criterion is a predetermined value (for example, 10) on the important item input screen 44. You may do so.

  As shown in FIG. 12, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 inputs information on the importance of each medium item from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 based on the input on the important item input screen 44. Is received (S302). Then, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 does not receive the pressing of the determination icon 44B of the important item input screen 44 from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S304: N), the control unit 11 continues S302. I do. On the other hand, when the pressing of the decision icon 44B is received (S304: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 sets the medium item importance setting table based on the data input to the important item input screen 44. The importance is registered in 20D-1 (S306).

  Next, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the display device 15 to display the future scenario selection screen 46 via the output interface 13 (S308). The future scenario selection screen 46 is a screen for selecting a scenario assumed by the user from a plurality of scenarios describing the future of the living environment in the area to be evaluated. Here, an example of the future scenario selection screen 46 will be described with reference to FIG. The future scenario selection screen 46 may be generated based on information stored in the scenario information table 20C.

  As shown in FIG. 18, a plurality of scenarios are displayed on the future scenario selection screen 46, and each scenario is provided with a check box 46A. Then, the scenario corresponding to the checked checkbox 46A on the future scenario selection screen 46 is selected as the future scenario assumed by the user.

  As shown in FIG. 12, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives a scenario selection from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 based on an input on the future scenario selection screen 46 (S310). Then, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 does not receive the pressing of the determination icon 46B of the future scenario selection screen 46 from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S312: N), the control unit 11 continues S310. I do. On the other hand, when the press of the determination icon 46B is received (S312: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 checks the scenario selected on the future scenario selection screen 46 (that is, the check box 46A). Based on the scenario, the importance of each data item is registered in the data item importance setting table 20D-2 (S314), and the input reception processing of the future scenario ends. The importance of each data item is set based on information stored in the scenario information table 20C for the selected scenario.

  Here, the description is continued by returning to the flowchart of FIG. 10 again. As shown in FIG. 10, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives the selection of the life stage-specific evaluation item input icon 40C from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S110), the life stage-specific evaluation is performed. An item input receiving process is executed (S112).

  Here, the input accepting process of the evaluation item for each life stage in S112 will be described based on the flowchart shown in FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 13, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the display device 15 to display the life stage input screen 48 via the output interface 13 (S400). The important item input screen 44 is a screen for inputting information for specifying the life stage of the user who is the evaluator. Here, an example of the life stage input screen 48 will be described with reference to FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 19, on the life stage input screen 48, answer items about the evaluator's age, gender, living style, number of household members, number of children living together, and age of children living together are displayed. Each answer item is provided with a check box 48A.

  As shown in FIG. 13, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 inputs information on the life stage of the evaluator from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 based on the input on the life stage input screen 48. Accepted (S402). If the controller 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 does not receive the pressing of the determination icon 48B on the life stage input screen 48 from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S404: N), the control unit 11 continues S402. I do. On the other hand, when the press of the determination icon 48B is received (S404: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 displays the most important item selection screen 50 on the display device 15 via the output interface 13 (S404). S406). Here, an example of the most important item selection screen 50 will be described with reference to FIG. Note that the most important item selection screen 50 may be generated based on information stored in the evaluation item information table 20E.

  As shown in FIG. 20, a list of a plurality of evaluation items is displayed on the most important item selection screen 50, and a check box 50A is provided for each evaluation item. The most important item selection screen 50 is a screen for selecting one evaluation item that the evaluator gives the most importance to among the displayed evaluation items, and the user checks one of the check boxes 50A. By pressing the determination icon 50B, the most important evaluation item can be selected.

  As shown in FIG. 13, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 transmits the evaluator's most important evaluation items from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 based on the input on the most important item selection screen 50. Is received (S408). If the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 does not receive the pressing of the determination icon 50B of the most important item selection screen 50 from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S410: N), the control unit 11 proceeds to S408. continue. On the other hand, when the pressing of the determination icon 50B is received (S410: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the display device 15 to display the important item selection screen 52 via the output interface 13 (S412). ). Here, an example of the important item selection screen 52 will be described with reference to FIG. The important item selection screen 52 is generated based on the information stored in the evaluation item information table 20E and the selection result on the most important item selection screen 50.

  As shown in FIG. 21, a list of a plurality of evaluation items is displayed on the important item selection screen 52, and a check box 52B is set for each evaluation item. The important item selection screen 52 is a screen for selecting a predetermined number (for example, four) of evaluation items that the evaluator places the second most importance on among the displayed evaluation items. Therefore, on the important item selection screen 52, the unselectable check box 52A is set for the most important item selected on the most important item selection screen 50, and selection is not possible. The user can check a check box 52B of a predetermined number of evaluation items to be selected on the important item selection screen 52, and select an evaluation item to be regarded as important by pressing the decision icon 52C.

  As shown in FIG. 13, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 outputs information on the evaluation items that the evaluator places importance on from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 based on the input on the important item selection screen 52. An input is received (S414). Then, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 does not receive the pressing of the determination icon 52C of the important item selection screen 52 from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S416: N), the control unit 11 continues S414. I do. On the other hand, when the press of the decision icon 52C is received (S416: Y), the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 stores the evaluator in the response information table 20F based on the information received in S402, S408, and S414, respectively. Is registered (S418), and the process of accepting input of evaluation items for each life stage ends.

  Here, the description is continued by returning to the flowchart of FIG. 10 again. As shown in FIG. 10, when the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives the selection of the living environment evaluation icon 40D from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S114), a plurality of areas to be evaluated are obtained. Then, a process of evaluating the living environment (dwelling environment evaluation process) is performed (S116).

  Here, the living environment evaluation processing of S116 will be described based on the flowchart shown in FIG.

  As illustrated in FIG. 14, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 sets the value of each data item of a plurality of areas to be evaluated stored in the publication data storage table 20B to one of a plurality of step values. (S500). Note that the above conversion processing is performed by the conversion unit 24, and the details are as described above for the conversion unit 24.

  Next, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 sets a weight coefficient for each of the middle item and the data item based on the item importance setting table 20D (S502). The above-described weight coefficient setting processing is executed by the weight setting unit 26, and the details are as described above for the weight setting unit 26.

  Next, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 calculates an evaluation value of each evaluation criterion for each area to be evaluated (S504). Note that the above-described evaluation value calculation process is executed by the evaluation value calculation unit 28, and the details are as described above for the evaluation value calculation unit 28.

  Next, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 sets the importance of each life stage evaluation item based on the answer information table 20F (S506). The above-described importance setting processing is executed by the evaluation item importance setting unit 32, and the details are as described above for the evaluation item importance setting unit 32.

  Next, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 calculates an evaluation value of each life stage for each area to be evaluated (S508). The process of calculating the evaluation value of each life stage is executed by the evaluation value calculating unit 34 for each life stage, and the details are as described above for the evaluation value calculating unit 34 for each life stage.

  The control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 may store the evaluation values calculated in S504 and S508 in the storage unit 12.

  Next, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 receives an output request for an evaluation result from the input device 16 via the input interface 14 (S510). For example, the output request may be a request to output an evaluation result (comprehensive evaluation result including a plurality of evaluation criteria and evaluations according to life stages) for one designated area, May be a request to output a comparison result obtained by comparing the regions.

  The control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 generates display information based on the output request received in S510 (S512), outputs the generated display information to the display device 15 via the output interface 13, and displays the display information on the screen. Is displayed (S514). Here, FIGS. 22 and 23 show an example of the output screen displayed on the display device 15 in S514.

  FIG. 22 shows an example of the comprehensive evaluation screen 54 showing the comprehensive evaluation result of the living environment for one area. As shown in FIG. 22, on the comprehensive evaluation screen 54, an area name display area 54A, an overall evaluation display area 54B, an evaluation display area by life stage 54C, and a regional feature display area 54D are displayed.

  The name of the area to be evaluated is displayed in the area name display area 54A. Then, in the comprehensive evaluation display area 54B, a radar chart based on the respective evaluation values for the six evaluation criteria of the area to be evaluated is displayed. The solid line in the radar chart indicates the evaluation value of the evaluation target area, and the dotted line indicates the average of the evaluation values of a plurality of areas.

  The evaluation value for each life stage of the area to be evaluated is displayed in the evaluation display area for each life stage 54C. In the area feature display area 54D, a list of items (advantage items) that are superior to other areas and data items that are inferior (advantage items) as compared to other areas among the data items of the area to be evaluated is displayed. . For example, a data item whose deviation value of a data item is a first threshold value (for example, a deviation value of 60 or more) is extracted as an advantage item, and a data item whose deviation value of a data item is a second threshold value (for example, a deviation value of 40 or less) is extracted. It may be extracted as a disadvantage item.

  According to the comprehensive evaluation screen 54 shown in FIG. 22, it is possible to visualize and present to the user the comprehensive evaluation result of the living environment of the area where the characteristics of one area are evaluated from a plurality of viewpoints.

  FIG. 23 shows an example of a comparison result screen 56 showing a comparison result of comparing a plurality of regions with a specified evaluation criterion (“safety”). As shown in FIG. 23, on the comparison result screen 56, an area comparison display area 56A and a legend display area 56B are displayed.

  In the area comparison display area 56A, a map of each area is displayed in a display mode based on the evaluation value of the specified evaluation criterion. The legend display area 56B shows the correspondence between the evaluation value and the display mode.

  According to the comparison result screen 56 shown in FIG. 23, it is easy to compare the superiority of a plurality of regions for one evaluation criterion.

  As illustrated in FIG. 14, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 returns to S510 if the end of the evaluation processing has not been received (S516: N), and has received the end of the evaluation processing. (S516: Y), the process ends.

  According to the living environment evaluation device 10 described above, the evaluation target area is evaluated based on both the objective data published about the evaluation target area and the items that the user places importance on the living environment. The living environment can be quantitatively evaluated based on predetermined evaluation criteria. That is, according to the living environment evaluation device 10, it is possible to obtain a highly reliable evaluation result of the living environment in the evaluation target area while reflecting the value of the user to the living environment.

  Further, according to the living environment evaluation device 10, the user's sense of value for the living environment is represented by a future scenario of the living environment set by the user. Here, by making the user select a desired text from texts describing the future scenario, the labor involved in setting the future scenario can be reduced. Furthermore, by setting the importance of the data item according to the data item and importance associated with the text selected as the future scenario, it contributes to the evaluation of the living environment according to the future scenario related to the user's selection. Adjust the importance of data items.

[4. Modification]
The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and various modifications are possible. Hereinafter, a modified example of the setting process of the future scenario will be described.

  First, a first modified example regarding the setting of the future scenario will be described with reference to FIG. Note that the first modification is different from the above embodiment in that the user sets the importance for each of the data items, but is common in other respects. Therefore, the above difference will be described below.

  FIG. 24 shows an example of a future scenario input screen 58 according to a first modification example regarding the setting of a future scenario. As shown in FIG. 24, the future scenario input screen 58 includes a check box 58A for directly selecting the importance of each data item. Then, when the check icon 58B is selected after any one of the check boxes 58A is checked for each data item on the future scenario input screen 58, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 causes the future scenario input screen The importance of each data item input to 58 is registered in the data item importance setting table 20D-2.

  In this way, by setting the importance directly for each of the data items related to the living environment, it is possible to accurately reflect the items that the user emphasizes in the evaluation of the living environment in the area.

  Next, a second modified example regarding the setting of the future scenario will be described with reference to FIGS. The second modification is different from the above-described embodiment in that the user freely describes a future scenario and sets importance to data items based on a keyword analysis of the described future scenario. Other points are common. Therefore, the above difference will be described below.

  FIG. 25 shows an example of a future scenario input screen 60 according to a second modification example regarding the setting of a future scenario. As shown in FIG. 25, the future scenario input screen 60 includes a free input field 60A. Then, when the decision icon 60B is selected after the text is entered in the free entry field 60A, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 executes the following processing.

  The control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 searches for a keyword stored in the keyword information table 20H stored in the storage unit 12 from the text (free input text) input in the free input field 60A.

  FIG. 26 illustrates an example of the keyword information table 20H stored in the storage unit 12 of the living environment evaluation device 10. As shown in FIG. 26, the keyword information table 20H stores data items and importance levels in association with keywords. The keyword item may store a logical expression for the keyword. For example, in FIG. 26, (accident) AND (decrease OR reduction) is associated when a keyword set of “accident” and “decrease” or a keyword set of “accident” and “decrease” appears. Means that the data items and the importances are applied.

  The control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 searches for the keywords stored in the keyword information table 20H from the freely input text, and based on the data items and importance associated with the searched keywords, the control unit 11 determines Set the importance. Then, the control unit 11 of the living environment evaluation device 10 registers the set importance in the medium item importance setting table 20D-1.

  In this way, the importance of the data items relating to the living environment can be adjusted based on the text in which the user freely describes the future scenario of the living environment. This allows the user's values to be flexibly reflected in the evaluation of the local living environment.

  In the above-described embodiment, an example in which the living environment evaluation device 10 is applied to a stand-alone computer has been described. However, the living environment evaluation device 10 is configured to receive a request from a client connected via a network and process Can also be configured as a server that executes. In addition, the functions provided in the living environment evaluation device 10 may be shared by a plurality of computers, and the living environment evaluation device 10 may be configured as a living environment evaluation system including a plurality of computers.

  In the above embodiment, a plurality of regions to be evaluated may be selected based on predetermined criteria and conditions. For example, an index (for example, a financial index) of each administrative division of a prefecture, a municipal government, or the like may be registered in advance, and an area (administrative division) to be evaluated may be selected based on the index. Specifically, one administrative section (reference section) serving as a reference is selected from the administrative sections, and the value of the selected reference section and the financial index are close (when the financial index is represented by a vector, the reference section A predetermined number of administrative divisions may be selected in order of (the distance between the administrative division and the vector is short). Further, the value of the financial index of the above-mentioned administrative division may be registered based on data published for each administrative division.

Reference Signs List 10 living environment evaluation device 11 control unit 12 storage unit 13 output interface 14 input interface 15 display device 16 input device 20 data storage unit 20A evaluation reference information table 20B public data storage table 20B-1 First region public data storage table 20B- 2 Published data storage table in the second area 20B-3 Published data storage table in the third area 20C Scenario information table 20D Item importance setting table 20D-1 Medium item importance setting table 20D-2 Data item importance setting table 20E Evaluation Item information table 20F Answer information table 20G Life stage importance information table 20H Keyword information table 22 Public data acquisition unit 24 Conversion unit 26 Weight setting unit 28 Evaluation value calculation unit 30 Answer information acquisition unit 32 Value item importance setting section 34 Life stage-based evaluation value calculation section 36 Output section 40 Menu screen 40A Published data input icon 40B Future scenario input icon 40C Life stage-based evaluation item input icon 40D Living environment evaluation icon 42 Published data input screen 42A Input Column 42B Decision Icon 44 Important Item Input Screen 44A Check Box 44B Decision Icon 46 Future Scenario Selection Screen 46A Check Box 46B Decision Icon 48 Life Stage Input Screen 48A Check Box 48B Decision Icon 50 Most Important Item Selection Screen 50A Check Box 50B Decision Icon 52 Important item selection screen 52A Unselectable check box 52B Check box 52C Decision icon 54 Overall evaluation screen 54A Area name display area 54B Comprehensive evaluation display area 54C Life stage-specific evaluation display area 54D Regional feature display area 56 Comparison result screen 56A Regional comparison display area 56B Legend display area 58 Future scenario input screen 58A Check box 58B Decision icon 60 Future scenario input screen 60A Free entry field 60B decision icon

Claims (12)

Acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items on the living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
Conversion means for converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range,
Setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion and a weight set by the setting unit. Evaluation value calculating means for performing
Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means,
A plurality of texts describing a scenario of the living environment for the plurality of regions, and storage means for storing information of data items associated with the plurality of texts,
The living environment evaluation device , wherein the setting unit sets a weight of each of the plurality of data items based on a data item associated with a text selected by a user from the plurality of texts . The storage unit stores data items for the plurality of texts in association with the importance of the data items,
The setting unit sets a weight of each of the plurality of data items based on the importance of the data item associated with the selected text.
The living environment evaluation device according to claim 1, wherein: Acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items on the living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
Conversion means for converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range,
Setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion and a weight set by the setting unit. Evaluation value calculating means for performing
Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means,
Keyword storage means for storing a data item and a degree of importance in association with a keyword,
The setting unit searches for a keyword stored in the keyword storage unit from text input by the user, and based on the data items stored in association with the searched keyword and the importance, the plurality of data items Set the weight of each
A living environment evaluation device characterized by the above-mentioned. The said output means outputs the comparison result which compared the said several area | region based on the evaluation value calculated by the said evaluation value calculation means about each of this several area | region. The Claims 1 thru | or 3 characterized by the above-mentioned. The living environment evaluation device according to any one of the preceding claims. The evaluation value calculation means, for each of the plurality of regions, based on a step value converted by the conversion means for the data items associated with each of a plurality of evaluation criteria, and a weight set by the setting means, Calculating each evaluation value of the plurality of evaluation criteria,
The output unit outputs an evaluation result based on an evaluation value calculated for each of the plurality of evaluation criteria, for at least one of the plurality of regions . Living evaluation apparatus according to an item. Evaluation item storage means for storing data items in association with a plurality of evaluation items related to the living environment;
Life stage of the user, and answer information obtaining means for obtaining answer information including the evaluation item and importance selected by the user from among a plurality of evaluation items,
Based on the answer information, importance setting means for setting the importance of each of the plurality of evaluation items for each of the life stages,
For each of the plurality of regions, based on the importance of each of the plurality of evaluation items set for each of the life stages, based on the step value and weight of a data item associated with each of the plurality of evaluation items, Life stage-specific evaluation value calculation means for calculating the evaluation value for each life stage,
The living environment evaluation device according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the output unit outputs evaluation information based on an evaluation value calculated by the life stage-specific evaluation value calculation unit. Acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items on the living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
Conversion means for converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range,
Setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion and a weight set by the setting unit. Evaluation value calculating means for performing
Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means,
A plurality of texts describing a scenario of the living environment for the plurality of regions, and storage means for storing information of data items associated with the plurality of texts,
The living environment evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the setting unit sets a weight of each of the plurality of data items based on a data item associated with a text selected by a user from the plurality of texts . Acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items on the living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
Conversion means for converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range,
Setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion and a weight set by the setting unit. Evaluation value calculating means for performing
Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means,
Keyword storage means for storing a data item and a degree of importance in association with a keyword,
The setting unit searches for a keyword stored in the keyword storage unit from text input by the user, and based on the data items stored in association with the searched keyword and the importance, the plurality of data items Set the weight of each
A living environment evaluation system characterized by the following. Computer
An obtaining step of obtaining values of a plurality of data items related to a living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
A conversion step of converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range;
A setting step of setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion step and a weight set by the setting step for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion. Evaluation value calculating step to be performed;
An output step of outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation step,
Executing a plurality of texts describing the scenario of the living environment for the plurality of regions, and a storage step of storing information of data items associated with the plurality of texts,
In the setting step, a weight of each of the plurality of data items is set based on a data item associated with a text selected by a user from the plurality of texts . Computer
An obtaining step of obtaining values of a plurality of data items related to a living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
A conversion step of converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range;
A setting step of setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion step and a weight set by the setting step for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion. Evaluation value calculating step to be performed;
An output step of outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation step,
Executing a keyword storage step of storing the data item and the importance in association with the keyword,
In the setting step, a keyword stored in the keyword storage step is searched for from the text input by the user, and the plurality of data items are stored based on the data items stored in association with the searched keyword and importance. Set the weight of each
A living environment evaluation method characterized by the following. Acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items on the living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
Conversion means for converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range,
Setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion and a weight set by the setting unit. Evaluation value calculating means for performing
Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means ,
A plurality of texts describing a scenario of the living environment for the plurality of regions, and a program for causing a computer to function as storage means for storing information of data items associated with the plurality of texts,
The setting unit sets a weight of each of the plurality of data items based on a data item associated with a text selected by a user from the plurality of texts.
A program characterized by that: Acquiring means for acquiring values of a plurality of data items on the living environment published for each of the plurality of regions;
Conversion means for converting the value of each of the plurality of data items of each of the plurality of regions into one of step values within a predetermined value range,
Setting means for setting a weight for each of the plurality of data items based on a weight setting condition input from a user,
For each of the plurality of regions, an evaluation value for the evaluation criterion is calculated based on a step value converted by the conversion unit and a weight set by the setting unit for a data item associated with a predetermined evaluation criterion. Evaluation value calculating means for performing
  Output means for outputting evaluation information based on the evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means,
A program for causing a computer to function as keyword storage means for storing a data item and importance in association with a keyword,
The setting unit searches for a keyword stored in the keyword storage unit from text input by the user, and based on the data items stored in association with the searched keyword and the importance, the plurality of data items Set the weight of each
A program characterized by that:

Images