JP6586662B2 - Facility evaluation support program, facility evaluation support method, and facility evaluation support device - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a facility evaluation support program, a facility evaluation support method, and a facility evaluation support apparatus.

  The problem of aging public facilities is a challenge for local governments. It is predicted that it will be difficult to maintain all public facilities in the future due to severe financial conditions. In view of changes in demand for use due to population decline and aging, local governments aim to optimize public facilities. It is urged.

  Under such circumstances, the trend of complex facilities is becoming the mainstream as a recent trend of local governments. For example, instead of handling multiple public facilities such as adjacent public halls and museums separately, they try to create new value by cooperating with each other, removing barriers between vertically divided public facilities, It is a movement to review as a facility with new functions.

  As related prior art, for example, there is a technique for performing evaluation for effectively using public facilities as assets. There is also a technology to prioritize repair work between facilities.

JP 2005-235164 A JP 2008-217655 A

  However, in the prior art, the facility may not be properly evaluated. For example, the facility to be evaluated may be a complex facility that is also used as a place for providing other services other than a specific service. In this case, if the evaluator does not know that the facility is a complex facility, even if the usage status of other services is good, if the usage status of a specific service is bad, the rating of the facility is low. End up.

  In one aspect, an object of the present invention is to provide a facility evaluation support program, a facility evaluation support method, and a facility evaluation support apparatus that support facility evaluation.

According to one aspect of the present invention, a first value indicating an evaluation value related to a physical state of a facility, and a second value indicating an evaluation value regarding a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility. And when the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the distribution is determined based on the first value and the second value. In the arrangement position on the figure, it is displayed that the facility is a complex facility, and when the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram, the first corresponding to the first area is displayed . An evaluation flow is displayed, and the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area in accordance with designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram. to modify and display facility evaluation support program, facility Price support method, and facility evaluation support apparatus is proposed.

  Further, according to one aspect of the present invention, a first value indicating an evaluation value related to a physical state of a facility and a first value indicating an evaluation value regarding a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility. When the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram, the first value is obtained. The first evaluation flow corresponding to the area is displayed, and the first evaluation flow is displayed in the second area according to the designation of the second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram. A facility evaluation support program, a facility evaluation support method, and a facility evaluation support device that are displayed by changing to a corresponding second evaluation flow are proposed.

  According to one embodiment of the present invention, facility evaluation can be supported.

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of an example of the facility evaluation support method according to the embodiment. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a system configuration example of the facility evaluation support system 200. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of the client device 201. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the facility information DB 220. FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a specific example of the scatter diagram G. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the evaluation flow DB 230. FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the evaluation item value DB 240. FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing a screen example of the condition input screen 900. FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing a screen example of the portfolio screen 1100. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram (part 1) illustrating a screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram (part 2) of the screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram (part 3) of the screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram (part 4) of a screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. FIG. 16 is a flowchart (part 1) illustrating an example of the facility evaluation support processing procedure of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. FIG. 17 is a flowchart (part 2) illustrating an example of the facility evaluation support processing procedure of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of a facility evaluation support program, a facility evaluation support method, and a facility evaluation support apparatus according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

(One example of facility evaluation support method)
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of an example of the facility evaluation support method according to the embodiment. In FIG. 1, a facility evaluation support apparatus 101 is a computer that supports facility evaluation. The facility to be evaluated is a facility used as a place for providing a specific service, and includes buildings and facilities.

  For example, the facility may be a public facility operated and managed by each local government such as a prefecture or a municipality, or may be a private facility operated and managed by a private company. Specific examples of facilities include government buildings, police facilities, firefighting facilities, residential facilities, schools, libraries, museums, museums, museums, cultural halls, research facilities, inspection facilities, leisure facilities, and store facilities.

  In addition, the evaluation of the facility is performed based on, for example, the physical state of the facility and the usage status of the service provided by the facility. The physical state of the facility is determined based on, for example, the degree of deterioration of buildings and facilities in the facility, resistance to earthquakes, and the like. In addition, the usage status of the service provided at the facility is determined based on, for example, the number of users of the service, the operation rate, and the like.

  Some facilities are called so-called complex facilities that are used not only for specific services but also for providing other services. For example, in local governments, as a part of optimization of public facilities, a plurality of facilities are combined and reviewed as a complex facility having a new function. For example, when a library is combined with an adjacent library and managed as a complex facility, the complex facility is both a library service providing place and a library service providing place.

  Here, when an analysis is performed on whether a facility is evaluated and the current state is maintained, or whether the facility is sold or diverted, the evaluation algorithm changes depending on whether or not the facility is a complex facility. For example, when a facility is a complex facility, the facility may be underestimated if the evaluation considering the complex facility is not performed.

  More specifically, for example, if a facility that is also used as a place for providing other services other than a specific service is evaluated as a single facility that provides only a specific service, the usage status of the other service may be At best, if the usage of a particular service is bad, the rating of the facility is low. Furthermore, when considering the renovation, rebuilding, or abolition of a facility, if the facility is a complex facility, the facility cannot be considered alone, but consider other facilities included in the complex facility. Must-have. That is, when evaluating a facility, it is important to evaluate the facility after grasping whether or not the facility is a complex facility.

  Therefore, in the present embodiment, a facility evaluation support method for preventing an underestimation of a complex facility that is also used as a service providing place other than a specific service will be described. Hereinafter, a processing example of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 will be described.

  (1) The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 includes a first value indicating an evaluation value regarding the physical state of the facility, and a second value indicating an evaluation value regarding the use status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility. Get the value. Here, the evaluation value related to the physical state of the facility is one index for evaluating the current state of the facility, and is evaluated based on, for example, the earthquake resistance or the degree of deterioration of the buildings and facilities in the facility. Is done.

  An evaluation value related to the usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility is an index for evaluating the current status of the facility, such as the number of users of a specific service and the operating rate. It is evaluated based on. Specifically, for example, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 acquires the first value and the second value of the facility to be evaluated from the storage unit 110.

  The storage unit 110 stores a value indicating an evaluation value related to the physical state of the facility in association with a value indicating an evaluation value regarding the usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility. The value indicating each evaluation value of the facility may be set manually, for example, and based on the earthquake resistance and deterioration degree of the buildings and facilities in the facility, the number of users of the specific service, the operating rate, etc. The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 may calculate each.

  In the example of FIG. 1, for facilities A, B, C, and D to be evaluated, a first value indicating an evaluation value related to the physical state of each facility A to D, and a location corresponding to each facility A to D Assume that a second value indicating an evaluation value related to the usage status of a specific service provided in step S1 is acquired. Further, it is assumed that the facilities A and C are combined as a composite facility X.

  (2) The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 is determined based on the acquired first value and second value when the facility is a complex facility that is used as a service providing location other than a specific service. In the arrangement position on the scatter diagram, the facility is displayed so as to be identifiable as a complex facility. Here, the scatter diagram is a diagram showing the correlation between the evaluation value related to the physical state of the facility and the evaluation value related to the usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility.

  Specifically, for example, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 first determines whether or not the facility to be evaluated is a complex facility. Information indicating whether the facility is a complex facility is stored in the storage unit 110, for example. Here, when the facility is not a complex facility, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 displays the name of the facility at an arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value, for example. .

  On the other hand, when the facility to be evaluated is a complex facility, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, for example, at the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value, Display the name. At this time, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 may display the name of the facility at the arrangement position on the scatter diagram together with the name of the complex facility.

  In the example of FIG. 1, a scatter diagram 130 is displayed on the display screen 120. The display screen 120 may be included in the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, or may be included in another computer connected to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101.

  Scatter chart 130 is an axis (horizontal axis) representing an evaluation value relating to the physical state of the facility, an axis (vertical axis) representing an evaluation value relating to the usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility, It is a figure which consists of. Here, the minimum value of each axis (horizontal axis, vertical axis) is “1.00”, and the maximum value is “3.00”.

  The icons 131 to 134 and the names of the facilities A to D are displayed in association with each other at the arrangement positions on the scatter diagram 130 determined based on the first value and the second value of each facility A to D. Yes. In addition, at the arrangement position on the scatter diagram 130 determined based on the first value and the second value of the facilities A and C, the name of the complex facility X is displayed together with the names of the facilities A and C. Yes.

  Thus, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, when the facility is a complex facility, the facility is the complex facility at the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined from the first value and the second value of the facility. Can be displayed in an identifiable manner. As a result, when evaluating a facility based on the relationship between the physical state of the facility and the usage status of a specific service, it is possible to grasp whether or not the facility is a complex facility. It is possible to prevent underestimation of complex facilities used other than services.

  In the example of FIG. 1, for example, when the evaluator evaluates the facility C with reference to the scatter diagram 130, the facility C is a complex facility, and the facility A displaying the same complex facility name is the facility C. It is possible to grasp that they are compounded. Thereby, for example, it is possible to prevent that the evaluation is performed based only on the physical state of the facility C and the usage status of a specific service, and the complex facility X including the facility C is underestimated.

(System configuration example of facility evaluation support system 200)
Next, a system configuration example of the facility evaluation support system 200 according to the embodiment will be described. Here, the facility evaluation support system 200 introduced into each local government such as a prefecture or a municipality will be described as an example.

  FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a system configuration example of the facility evaluation support system 200. In FIG. 2, the facility evaluation support system 200 includes a facility evaluation support apparatus 101 and a plurality of client apparatuses 201. In the facility evaluation support system 200, the facility evaluation support device 101 and the plurality of client devices 201 are connected via a wired or wireless network 210. The network 210 is, for example, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), or the Internet.

  Here, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 includes a facility information DB (database) 220, an evaluation flow DB 230, and an evaluation item value DB 240, and supports facility evaluation. The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 is a server, for example. The facility information DB 220, the evaluation flow DB 230, and the evaluation item value DB 240 will be described later with reference to FIG. 5, FIG. 7, and FIG.

  The client device 201 is a computer used by an evaluator who evaluates a facility. For example, the client device 201 is a PC (personal computer) or a notebook PC of a local government employee.

(Hardware configuration example of facility evaluation support apparatus 101)
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. In FIG. 3, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 301, a memory 302, an I / F (Interface) 303, a disk drive 304, and a disk 305. Each component is connected by a bus 300.

  Here, the CPU 301 governs overall control of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. The memory 302 includes, for example, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), and a flash ROM. Specifically, for example, a flash ROM or ROM stores various programs, and a RAM is used as a work area for the CPU 301. The program stored in the memory 302 is loaded into the CPU 301 to cause the CPU 301 to execute the coded process.

  The I / F 303 is connected to the network 210 via a communication line, and is connected to another device (for example, the client device 201 illustrated in FIG. 2) via the network 210. The I / F 303 serves as an interface between the network 210 and the own apparatus, and controls input / output of data from other apparatuses. For example, a modem or a LAN adapter may be employed as the I / F 303.

  The disk drive 304 controls reading / writing of data with respect to the disk 305 according to the control of the CPU 301. The disk 305 stores data written under the control of the disk drive 304. Examples of the disk 305 include a magnetic disk and an optical disk.

  The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 may include, for example, an SSD (Solid State Drive), a keyboard, a mouse, and a display in addition to the above-described components.

(Example of hardware configuration of client apparatus 201)
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a hardware configuration example of the client apparatus 201. In FIG. 4, the client device 201 includes a CPU 401, a memory 402, a disk drive 403, a disk 404, an I / F 405, a display 406, and an input device 407. Each component is connected by a bus 400.

  Here, the CPU 401 governs overall control of the client device 201. The memory 402 includes, for example, a ROM, a RAM, a flash ROM, and the like. Specifically, for example, a flash ROM or ROM stores various programs, and the RAM is used as a work area of the CPU 401. The program stored in the memory 402 is loaded on the CPU 401 to cause the CPU 401 to execute the coded process.

  The disk drive 403 controls reading / writing of data with respect to the disk 404 according to the control of the CPU 401. The disk 404 stores data written under the control of the disk drive 403. Examples of the disk 404 include a magnetic disk and an optical disk.

  The I / F 405 is connected to the network 210 through a communication line, and is connected to another device (for example, the facility evaluation support device 101 shown in FIG. 2) via the network 210. The I / F 405 controls the interface between the network 210 and the own apparatus, and controls input / output of data from other apparatuses.

  The display 406 displays data such as a document, an image, and function information as well as a cursor, an icon, or a tool box. As the display 406, for example, a liquid crystal display, a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube), or the like can be adopted.

  The input device 407 has keys for inputting characters, numbers, various instructions, and the like, and inputs data. The input device 407 may be a keyboard or a mouse, or may be a touch panel type input pad or a numeric keypad.

(Contents stored in the facility information DB 220)
Next, the storage contents of the facility information DB 220 included in the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 will be described. The facility information DB 220 is realized by a storage device such as the memory 302 and the disk 305 shown in FIG. The storage unit 110 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to the facility information DB 220, for example.

  FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the facility information DB 220. In FIG. 5, the facility information DB 220 has fields of target year, facility number, facility name, complex facility name, building performance, needs / efficiency, secondary evaluation result, and icon, and sets information in each field. The facility information (for example, facility information 500-1 to 500-8) is stored as a record.

  Here, the target year indicates which year the facility information is for. The facility number is an identifier for identifying a facility. The facility name is the name of the facility. The complex facility name is the name of the complex facility. When the facility is a single facility, the complex facility name field is “blank”.

  The building performance is an evaluation value related to the physical state of the facility. Building performance is evaluated based on four indicators: seismic performance, remaining expected life, building deterioration, and facility deterioration. Specifically, for example, the evaluator evaluates each of the facilities with respect to seismic performance, remaining expected life, building deterioration level, and equipment deterioration level in three stages of one point, two points, and three points. The average score is the building performance score (evaluation value).

  Needs / efficiency is an evaluation value related to the usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to a facility. Needs / efficiency is evaluated by indicators that show the usage status and efficiency according to the purpose of each facility, such as the number of users of specific services, operating rate, office space per person, and facility operation costs. Specifically, for example, for each facility, the evaluator indicates the number of users of a specific service, the operation rate, the office space area per person, and the facility operation cost. Evaluate in stages, and use the average score as the score for needs and efficiency (evaluation value).

  The secondary evaluation results are evaluated for each facility according to a flowchart (for example, evaluation flows F1 to F9 shown in FIG. 7 to be described later) from the viewpoints of installation purpose, location environment, etc. for future direction studies. It is a result of. The evaluation of the facility takes into account, for example, the results of the “primary evaluation” that evaluates the current state of the facility with objective figures such as building performance, needs and efficiency, and the results of the “secondary evaluation” described above. Done.

  The icon is a symbol indicating the secondary evaluation result, and is used when displaying the primary evaluation result of each facility on a scatter diagram G as shown in FIG. As an example, when the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” is taken as an example, the icon indicating the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” is “♦”.

  Although illustration is omitted, the facility information in the facility information DB 220 includes, for example, information such as the jurisdiction section, facility location, installation year, site area, building area, total floor area, and main usage of each facility. . The facility information in the facility information DB 220 includes each evaluation item (for example, seismic performance, remaining expected life, building deterioration degree, equipment deterioration degree, etc.) used when obtaining the building performance score (evaluation value) of each facility. ) May be included. In addition, the facility information in the facility information DB 220 includes each evaluation item (for example, the number of users, the operating rate, and the office room area per person) used when obtaining the needs / efficiency scores (evaluation values) of each facility. , Facility operation costs, etc.) may be included.

  Moreover, the value which shows the building performance of each facility P1-P8 is calculated by the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 based on the score of each evaluation item (for example, seismic performance, remaining expected life, building deterioration degree, equipment deterioration degree, etc.). You may decide. Similarly, the values indicating the needs / efficiencies of the facilities P1 to P8 are evaluated based on the score of each evaluation item (for example, the number of users, the operating rate, the office space area per person, the facility operation cost, etc.). The support apparatus 101 may calculate the value.

(Specific example of scatter diagram G)
Below, the specific example of the scatter diagram G which displays the primary evaluation result of each facility is demonstrated.

  FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a specific example of the scatter diagram G. In FIG. 6, a scatter diagram G is composed of an axis (horizontal axis) representing building performance and an axis (vertical axis) representing needs / efficiency, and represents a correlation between the building performance of the facility and needs / efficiency. It is. Here, the minimum value of each axis (horizontal axis, vertical axis) is set to “1.00”, and the maximum value is set to “3.00”.

  Further, the scatter diagram G is divided into nine areas from the first quadrant to the ninth quadrant. Further, different evaluation flows (for example, evaluation flows F1 to F9 shown in FIG. 7 described later) are associated with each area of the first quadrant to the ninth quadrant, and 2 according to the result of the primary evaluation. It is designed so that the evaluation flow used in the next evaluation is different.

  In the example of FIG. 6, the case where the scatter diagram G is divided into nine areas has been described as an example, but the number of areas into which the scatter diagram G is divided can be arbitrarily set.

(Storage contents of evaluation flow DB 230)
Next, the contents stored in the evaluation flow DB 230 of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 will be described. The evaluation flow DB 230 is realized by a storage device such as the memory 302 and the disk 305 shown in FIG.

  FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the evaluation flow DB 230. In FIG. 7, the evaluation flow DB 230 stores evaluation flows F1 to F9 corresponding to the areas (first quadrant to ninth quadrant) on the scatter diagram G shown in FIG. Evaluation flows F1 to F9 are flowcharts for evaluating each facility (secondary evaluation) from the viewpoints of installation purpose, location environment, and the like for future direction studies.

  A specific example of the evaluation flow will be described later with reference to FIGS.

(Storage contents of evaluation item value DB 240)
Next, the contents stored in the evaluation item value DB 240 of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 will be described. The evaluation item value DB 240 is realized by a storage device such as the memory 302 and the disk 305 shown in FIG.

  FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the contents stored in the evaluation item value DB 240. In FIG. 8, the evaluation item value DB 240 stores evaluation item value information 800-1 to 800-8 of the facilities P1 to P8. The evaluation item value information 800-1 to 800-8 is information indicating the facility numbers of the facilities P1 to P8 and the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 in association with each other.

  Each evaluation item 1-6 is an item referred when examining future directions of each facility P1-P8. The item value of each evaluation item 1-6 has shown the result in which the evaluator evaluated each facility P1-P8 about each evaluation item 1-6. Here, each evaluation item 1 to 6 is evaluated by either “YES” or “NO”.

  Evaluation item 1 is an item for evaluating whether the facility is “a facility that must be legally installed” or “a facility that does not have to be legally installed”. Evaluation item 2 is an item for evaluating the validity of possession as a public facility. Evaluation item 3 is an item for evaluating whether or not the current operation method and usage method match the facility purpose at the time of installation.

  Evaluation item 4 is an item for evaluating whether or not the facility can be relocated. Evaluation item 5 is an item for evaluating whether or not the facility has surplus. Evaluation item 6 is an item for evaluating the quality of the location conditions. Based on the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 of each facility, the secondary evaluation result of each facility is determined by proceeding with the evaluation flow according to the primary evaluation result of each facility.

(Screen example of condition input screen 900)
Next, a screen example of the condition input screen 900 displayed on the display 406 of the client device 201 will be described. In the following description, a case where a user performs a click operation as an operation for selecting a box, a button, or the like displayed on various screens of the client device 201 will be described as an example.

  FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing a screen example of the condition input screen 900. In FIG. 9, a condition input screen 900 is an operation screen for inputting search conditions for searching for facilities to be evaluated.

  In the condition input screen 900, for example, when a box 901 is clicked by a user operation input using the input device 407 shown in FIG. 4, the target year can be specified. For example, when “2014 year” is designated as the target year, the facility to be evaluated is searched for the facility information 500-1 to 500-8 in 2014 in the facility information DB 220.

  In addition, when the box 902 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the facility number of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when a box 903 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the facility name of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when a box 904 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the main application of the facility to be evaluated can be designated.

  In addition, when the box 905 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the jurisdiction section of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when the box 906 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the facility location of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when a box 907 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the complex facility name of the facility to be evaluated can be designated.

  In addition, when the box 908 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the installation year of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when the box 909 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the site area of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when the box 910 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the building area of the facility to be evaluated can be designated. In addition, when the box 911 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the total floor area of the facility to be evaluated can be designated.

  In addition, when the check box 912 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, it is possible to select whether or not to display the primary evaluation result (portfolio) of the facility to be evaluated. In addition, when the check box 913 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, it is possible to select whether or not to display the secondary evaluation result (facility evaluation sheet) of the facility to be evaluated.

  When the button 914 is clicked on the condition input screen 900, the primary evaluation result (for example, the portfolio screen 1100 shown in FIG. 11 described later) or the secondary evaluation of the facility that matches the search condition specified on the condition input screen 900 is displayed. A result (for example, a facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 shown in FIG. 12 described later) is displayed.

(Functional configuration example of facility evaluation support apparatus 101)
FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration example of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. In FIG. 10, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 includes a reception unit 1001, a search unit 1002, and a display control unit 1003. The receiving unit 1001 to the display control unit 1003 are functions as control units. Specifically, for example, by causing the CPU 301 to execute a program stored in a storage device such as the memory 302 and the disk 305 illustrated in FIG. Alternatively, the function is realized by the I / F 303. The processing result of each functional unit is stored in a storage device such as the memory 302 and the disk 305, for example.

  The accepting unit 1001 accepts input of search conditions for searching for facilities to be evaluated. Specifically, for example, the reception unit 1001 receives the search condition input on the condition input screen 900 illustrated in FIG. 9 from the client device 201, so that the search condition for searching for the facility to be evaluated is set. Accept input.

  The search unit 1002 searches for a facility that matches the input search condition. Specifically, for example, the search unit 1002 searches the facility information DB 220 (see, for example, FIG. 5) for facility information of a facility that matches the input search condition. For example, when only the target year “2014” is specified as the search condition, the search unit 1002 searches the facility information DB 220 for the facility information 500-1 to 500-8. When the target year “2014” and the facility name “facility 2” are designated as the search conditions, the search unit 1002 searches the facility information DB 220 for the facility information 500-2.

  The display control unit 1003 performs control to display the primary evaluation result of the found facility. Here, the primary evaluation result is a result of the primary evaluation that evaluates the current state of the facility by objective figures such as building performance, needs and efficiency. Specifically, for example, the display control unit 1003 may generate screen information of a portfolio screen 1100 as shown in FIG. 11 described later based on the facility information of the searched facility.

  Hereinafter, an example of processing of the display control unit 1003 will be described using the facility information 500-1 and 500-2 as examples. Here, first, a processing example of the display control unit 1003 will be described using the facility information 500-1 as an example.

  The display control unit 1003 acquires a value “1.75” indicating the building performance of the facility P1 and a value “1.50” indicating the needs / efficiency from the facility information 500-1. Then, the display control unit 1003 specifies the arrangement position on the scatter diagram G based on the acquired value “1.75” indicating the building performance and the value “1.50” indicating the need / efficiency.

  Next, the display control unit 1003 determines whether the facility P1 is a complex facility with reference to the complex facility name in the facility information 500-1. Here, since the complex facility name is not set, it is determined that the facility P1 is not a complex facility. Then, when the facility P1 is not a complex facility, the display control unit 1003 displays the facility P1 as an identifiable facility at an arrangement position on the specified scatter diagram G. More specifically, for example, the display control unit 1003 may display the facility name “facility 1” of the facility P1 at the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G.

  Furthermore, the display control unit 1003 may display the secondary evaluation result of the facility P1 based on the evaluation flow corresponding to the area to which the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G belongs in an identifiable manner at the arrangement position. . More specifically, for example, the display control unit 1003 displays an icon “◆” indicating the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facility P1 at the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G. May be. The icon “♦” indicating the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facility P1 is specified from the facility information 500-1.

  Next, a processing example of the display control unit 1003 will be described using the facility information 500-2 as an example.

  The display control unit 1003 acquires a value “2.25” indicating the building performance of the facility P2 and a value “1.00” indicating the needs / efficiency from the facility information 500-2. Then, the display control unit 1003 specifies the arrangement position on the scatter diagram G based on the acquired value “2.25” indicating the building performance and the value “1.00” indicating the need / efficiency.

  Next, the display control unit 1003 refers to the complex facility name in the facility information 500-2 and determines whether or not the facility P2 is a complex facility. Here, since the complex facility name “complex facility 1” is set, it is determined that the facility P2 is a complex facility. When the facility P2 is a complex facility, the display control unit 1003 displays the identified location of the facility P2 on the scatter diagram G so that the facility P2 is a complex facility.

  More specifically, for example, the display control unit 1003 may display the complex facility name “complex facility 1” at the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G. Further, for example, the display control unit 1003 may display the facility name “facility 2” and the complex facility name “complex facility 1” of the facility P2 at the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G.

  Furthermore, the display control unit 1003 may display the secondary evaluation result of the facility P2 based on the evaluation flow corresponding to the area to which the arrangement position on the specified scatter diagram G belongs so as to be identifiable at the arrangement position. . More specifically, for example, the display control unit 1003 displays an icon “◆” indicating the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facility P2 at the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G. May be. The icon “♦” indicating the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facility P2 is specified from the facility information 500-2.

  Thereby, the screen information of the portfolio screen 1100 as shown in FIG. 11 described later can be generated. Then, the display control unit 1003 transmits the screen information of the generated portfolio screen 1100 to the client device 201. Thereby, the portfolio screen 1100 can be displayed on the display 406 of the client apparatus 201.

  An example of the portfolio screen 1100 will be described later with reference to FIG.

  The display control unit 1003 performs control to display the first evaluation flow corresponding to the first area when the specified arrangement position on the scatter diagram G belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram G. . For example, it is assumed that the first area to which the arrangement position on the scatter diagram G belongs is the “eighth quadrant” for the facility P1 to be evaluated.

  In this case, for example, the display control unit 1003 acquires the evaluation flow F8 corresponding to the eighth quadrant from the evaluation flow DB 230 illustrated in FIG. Then, the display control unit 1003 displays the acquired evaluation flow F8 on the display 406 of the client device 201. At this time, the display control unit 1003 may display the secondary evaluation result of the facility P1 based on the evaluation flow F8 together with the acquired evaluation flow F8.

  In addition, the display control unit 1003 refers to the evaluation item value information 800-1 of the facility P1 in the evaluation item value DB 240 illustrated in FIG. 8, for example, according to the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 of the facility P1. The route on the evaluation flow F8 may be specified. Then, the display control unit 1003 may display the identified route on the evaluation flow F8 in an identifiable manner.

  In addition, the display control unit 1003, together with the acquired evaluation flow F8, each evaluation item (for example, seismic performance, remaining expected life, building deterioration level, etc.) used when obtaining the building performance score (evaluation value) of the facility P1. You may decide to display the score of an equipment degradation degree etc.). The score of each evaluation item (for example, seismic performance, remaining expected life, building deterioration degree, equipment deterioration degree, etc.) is specified from, for example, the facility information 500-1 of the facility P1.

  In addition, the display control unit 1003, together with the acquired evaluation flow F8, each evaluation item (e.g., the number of users, the operating rate, and the per person) used when obtaining the needs / efficiency score (evaluation value) of the facility P1. The office space, facility operation cost, etc.) may be displayed. The score of each evaluation item (for example, the number of users, the operation rate, the office space area per person, the facility operation cost, etc.) is specified from, for example, the facility information 500-1 of the facility P1.

  More specifically, for example, the display control unit 1003 may generate screen information of a facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 as illustrated in FIG. Thereby, the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 can be displayed on the display 406 of the client device 201.

  A screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 will be described later with reference to FIG.

  In addition, the reception unit 1001 receives designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram G. The designation of the second area is performed on the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200, for example. Specifically, for example, the accepting unit 1001 accepts the designation of the second area by receiving the designation result designated on the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 from the client device 201.

  The display control unit 1003 also displays the displayed first evaluation flow corresponding to the second area according to the designation of the second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram G. Change to display. For example, it is assumed that the first area to which the arrangement position on the scatter diagram G belongs is set as “eighth quadrant” and “seventh quadrant” is designated as the second area for the facility P1 to be evaluated.

  In this case, the display control unit 1003 acquires, for example, the evaluation flow F7 corresponding to the seventh quadrant from the evaluation flow DB 230. Then, the display control unit 1003 changes the evaluation flow F8 displayed on the client device 201 to the acquired evaluation flow F7 and displays it.

  At this time, the display control unit 1003 may determine the secondary evaluation result of the facility P1 based on the evaluation flow F7 with reference to the evaluation item value information 800-1 of the facility P1. Then, the display control unit 1003 may display the determined secondary evaluation result together with the acquired evaluation flow F7. However, the secondary evaluation result of each facility based on each evaluation flow F1 to F9 may be determined in advance and stored in the facility information DB 220, for example.

(Screen example of portfolio screen 1100)
Next, a screen example of the portfolio screen 1100 displayed on the display 406 of the client device 201 will be described. Here, as a result of specifying the target year “2014” as a search condition, a case where “facility P1 to P8 in 2014” is searched as a facility to be evaluated will be described as an example.

  FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing a screen example of the portfolio screen 1100. In FIG. 11, a portfolio screen 1100 is a screen that displays the primary evaluation results of the facilities P1 to P8 to be evaluated. The portfolio screen 1100 displays a scatter diagram G representing the correlation between the building performance and needs / efficiency of the facilities P1 to P8.

  Specifically, the icons 1101 to 1108 corresponding to the facilities P1 to P8 are displayed at the arrangement positions on the scatter diagram G determined from the values indicating the building performance of the facilities P1 to P8 and the values indicating the needs and efficiency. Has been. In addition, the facility names of the facilities P1 to P8 are displayed in association with the icons 1101 to 1108, respectively. Furthermore, the names of complex facilities are displayed in association with icons 1102 to 1105.

  Here, the icons 1101 and 1102 indicate the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facilities P1 and P2, respectively. Icons 1103, 1104, and 1106 indicate the secondary evaluation result “maintain status” of the facilities P 3, P 4, and P 6, respectively. The icon 1105 indicates the secondary evaluation result “facility renovation / function improvement” of the facility P5. The icon 1107 indicates the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function abolishment” of the facility P7. The icon 1108 indicates the secondary evaluation result “facility renovation / function maintenance” of the facility P8.

  According to the portfolio screen 1100, the user can confirm the relationship (primary evaluation result) between the building performance and needs / efficiency of the facilities P1 to P8. At this time, the user can grasp that the facilities P2 to P5 in which the complex facility name is displayed together with the facility name are complex facilities.

  Therefore, for example, it is possible to prevent the user from evaluating the facility P2 having low needs / efficiency as a single facility and underestimating the complex facility 1 including the facility P2. Furthermore, the user can confirm the secondary evaluation results of the facilities P1 to P8 by referring to the icons 1101 to 1108 corresponding to the facilities P1 to P8.

  On the portfolio screen 1100, for example, when an icon corresponding to any of the facilities P1 to P8 is clicked by a user operation input using the input device 407, a facility evaluation sheet screen of the facility (for example, 12 to 15) can be displayed.

(Screen example of facility evaluation sheet screen)
Next, screen examples of the facility evaluation sheet screen displayed on the display 406 of the client apparatus 201 will be described with reference to FIGS. Here, first, a screen example of a facility evaluation sheet screen displayed when the icon 1101 corresponding to the facility P1 is clicked on the portfolio screen 1100 will be described.

  FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram (part 1) illustrating a screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. In FIG. 12, a facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 is a screen displayed when an icon 1101 is clicked on the portfolio screen 1100 shown in FIG.

  On the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200, the evaluation flow F8 corresponding to the area (eighth quadrant) on the scatter diagram G to which the icon 1101 of the facility P1 belongs, and the secondary evaluation result of the facility P1 based on the evaluation flow F8 “facility sale / "Function transfer" is displayed. Further, on the evaluation flow F8, routes corresponding to the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 of the facility P1 are highlighted (in FIG. 12, bold arrows).

  The facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 displays a scatter diagram G representing the correlation between the building performance of the facility P1 and needs / efficiencies. Further, the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 shows the score of each evaluation item used when calculating the building performance score of the facility P1 and each evaluation item used when determining the needs / efficiency score of the facility P1. The number of points is displayed.

  According to the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200, the user confirms the content of the evaluation flow F8 corresponding to the primary evaluation result of the facility P1 and the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facility P1 based on the evaluation flow F8. can do. As a result, the user refers not only to the primary evaluation result of the facility P1 but also to the secondary evaluation result of evaluating the facility P1 from the viewpoint of the installation purpose, location environment, etc. for future direction studies, while referring to the facility P1. Evaluation can be made.

  Further, according to the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200, the user can confirm the score of each evaluation item used when obtaining the building performance and needs / efficiency scores of the facility P1. This makes it easy for the user to examine in detail what points should be improved regarding the building performance, needs, and efficiency of the facility P1.

  On the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200, when another area different from the area (eighth quadrant) on the scatter diagram G to which the icon 1101 of the facility P1 belongs is clicked, the displayed evaluation flow F8 corresponds to the other area. The evaluation flow can be changed and displayed. For example, when the seventh quadrant on the scatter diagram G is clicked, as shown in FIG. 13, an evaluation flow F7 corresponding to the seventh quadrant can be displayed.

  FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram (part 2) of the screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. 13, the facility evaluation sheet screen 1300 is a screen displayed when the seventh quadrant on the scatter diagram G is clicked on the facility evaluation sheet screen 1200 shown in FIG.

  The facility evaluation sheet screen 1300 displays the evaluation flow F7 corresponding to the seventh quadrant on the clicked scatter diagram G and the secondary evaluation result “facility transfer / function abolishment” of the facility P1 based on the evaluation flow F7. ing. Further, on the evaluation flow F7, routes corresponding to the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 of the facility P1 are highlighted (in FIG. 13, bold arrows).

  According to the facility evaluation sheet screen 1300, when the building performance of the facility P1 is lower than the current state, the secondary evaluation result of the facility P1 changes from “facility sale / function transfer” to “facility transfer / function abolishment”. I can confirm that. Thereby, the user can examine the future direction in anticipation of the case where the facility is deteriorated.

  In the facility evaluation sheet screen 1300, the seventh quadrant on the scatter diagram G is displayed in a background color different from other areas, and it is in a state where it is possible to identify which area is designated.

  Next, a screen example of a facility evaluation sheet screen displayed when the icon 1102 corresponding to the facility P2 is clicked on the portfolio screen 1100 will be described.

  FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram (part 3) of the screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. 14, a facility evaluation sheet screen 1400 is a screen displayed when an icon 1102 is clicked on the portfolio screen 1100 shown in FIG.

  On the facility evaluation sheet screen 1400, the evaluation flow F8 corresponding to the area (eighth quadrant) on the scatter diagram G to which the icon 1102 of the facility P2 belongs, and the secondary evaluation result of the facility P2 based on the evaluation flow F8 “facility sale / "Function transfer" is displayed. Further, on the evaluation flow F8, routes corresponding to the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 of the facility P2 are highlighted (in FIG. 14, bold arrows).

  The facility evaluation sheet screen 1400 displays a scatter diagram G representing the correlation between the building performance of the facility P2 and needs / efficiencies. Furthermore, the facility evaluation sheet screen 1400 shows the score of each evaluation item used when calculating the score of the building performance of the facility P2, and each evaluation item used when calculating the score of needs / efficiency of the facility P2. The number of points is displayed.

  According to the facility evaluation sheet screen 1400, the user confirms the secondary evaluation result “facility sale / function transfer” of the facility P2 based on the evaluation flow F8 together with the content of the evaluation flow F8 according to the primary evaluation result of the facility P2. can do. Thus, the user can refer to not only the primary evaluation result of the facility P2 but also the secondary evaluation result of evaluating the facility P2 from the viewpoint of installation purpose, location environment, etc. Evaluation can be made.

  Further, according to the facility evaluation sheet screen 1400, the user can confirm the score of each evaluation item used when calculating the building performance and needs / efficiency scores of the facility P2. Thereby, it becomes easy to examine in detail what points should be improved regarding the building performance and needs / efficiency of the facility P2.

  On the facility evaluation sheet screen 1400, when another area different from the area (8th quadrant) on the scatter diagram G to which the icon 1102 of the facility P2 belongs is clicked, the displayed evaluation flow F8 corresponds to the other area. The evaluation flow can be changed and displayed. For example, when the ninth quadrant on the scatter diagram G is clicked, an evaluation flow F9 corresponding to the ninth quadrant can be displayed as shown in FIG.

  FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram (part 4) of a screen example of the facility evaluation sheet screen. 15, the facility evaluation sheet screen 1500 is a screen displayed when the ninth quadrant on the scatter diagram G is clicked on the facility evaluation sheet screen 1400 shown in FIG.

  The facility evaluation sheet screen 1500 displays the evaluation flow F9 corresponding to the ninth quadrant on the clicked scatter diagram G and the secondary evaluation result “facility renovation / function integration” of the facility P2 based on the evaluation flow F9. ing. Further, on the evaluation flow F9, routes corresponding to the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 of the facility P2 are highlighted (in FIG. 15, bold arrows).

  According to the facility evaluation sheet screen 1500, when the building performance of the facility P2 becomes higher than the current state, the user changes the secondary evaluation result of the facility P2 from “facility sale / function transfer” to “facility repair / function integration”. I can confirm that. Thereby, the user can examine the future direction in anticipation of the case where the facility P2 is repaired or rebuilt.

  In the facility evaluation sheet screen 1500, the ninth quadrant on the scatter chart G is displayed in a background color different from other areas, and it is in a state where it is possible to identify which area is designated.

(Facility evaluation support processing procedure of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101)
Next, the facility evaluation support processing procedure of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 will be described.

  16 and 17 are flowcharts illustrating an example of the facility evaluation support processing procedure of the facility evaluation support apparatus 101. In the flowchart of FIG. 16, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 first determines whether or not an input of search conditions for searching for a facility to be evaluated has been received (step S1601).

  Here, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 waits for an input of search conditions (step S1601: No). When the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 receives an input of a search condition (step S1601: Yes), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 searches the facility information DB 220 for facility information of a facility that matches the input search condition (step S1602).

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 reads the scatter diagram G from a storage device such as the memory 302 and the disk 305 (step S1603). The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 selects unselected facility information that has not been selected from the retrieved facility information (step S1604).

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 specifies the arrangement position on the read scatter diagram G based on the value indicating the building performance of the selected facility information and the value indicating the need / efficiency (step S1605). And the facility evaluation assistance apparatus 101 arrange | positions the icon of the selected facility information in the arrangement position on the specified scatter diagram G (step S1606).

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 refers to the complex facility name of the selected facility information and determines whether or not the facility is a complex facility (step S1607). When the facility is a complex facility (step S1607: Yes), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 arranges the facility name and the complex facility name in association with the arranged icon (step S1608), The process proceeds to step S1610.

  On the other hand, when the facility is not a complex facility (step S1607: No), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 arranges the facility name of the facility in association with the arranged icon (step S1609). The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 determines whether there is unselected facility information that has not been selected among the searched facility information (step S1610).

  When there is unselected facility information (step S1610: Yes), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 returns to step S1604. On the other hand, when there is no unselected facility information (step S1610: No), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 generates screen information of the portfolio screen including the scatter diagram G and displays it on the client device 201 (step S1611). The process moves to step S1701 shown in FIG.

  In the flowchart of FIG. 17, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 first determines whether any icon on the scatter diagram G is selected on the portfolio screen (step S1701). Here, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 waits for an icon on the scatter diagram G to be selected (step S1701: No).

  When the icon on the scatter diagram G is selected (step S1701: Yes), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 identifies the area on the scatter diagram G to which the selected icon belongs (step S1702). Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 acquires an evaluation flow corresponding to the identified area on the scatter diagram G from the evaluation flow DB 230 (step S1703).

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 acquires evaluation item value information of the facility corresponding to the selected icon from the evaluation item value DB 240 (step S1704). And the facility evaluation assistance apparatus 101 specifies the route | root on the evaluation flow according to the item value of each evaluation item 1-6 based on the acquired evaluation item value information (step S1705).

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 generates screen information of a facility evaluation sheet screen including the acquired evaluation flow and displays it on the client apparatus 201 (step S1706). At this time, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 displays, for example, the identified route on the evaluation flow so that it can be identified.

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 determines whether another area different from the area on the scatter diagram G identified in step S1702 is designated (step S1707). If no other area is designated (step S1707: No), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 proceeds to step S1711.

  On the other hand, when another area is designated (step S1707: Yes), an evaluation flow corresponding to the designated other area is acquired from the evaluation flow DB 230 (step S1708). Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 specifies a route on the evaluation flow corresponding to another area according to the item values of the evaluation items 1 to 6 based on the acquired evaluation item value information (step S1709). ).

  The facility evaluation support apparatus 101 generates screen information of a facility evaluation sheet screen including an evaluation flow corresponding to the acquired other area and displays the screen information on the client apparatus 201 (step S1710). At this time, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 displays, for example, a route on the evaluation flow corresponding to the specified other area so as to be identifiable.

  Next, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 determines whether a display end request for the facility evaluation sheet screen has been received from the client apparatus 201 (step S1711). The display end request for the facility evaluation sheet screen is made by a user operation input using the input device 407, for example.

  If the facility evaluation sheet screen display end request has not been received (step S1711: NO), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 returns to step S1707. On the other hand, when the display end request for the facility evaluation sheet screen is received (step S1711: Yes), the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 ends the series of processes according to the flowchart.

  Thereby, while making it possible to identify whether or not the facility is a complex facility, it is possible to confirm the primary evaluation result and the secondary evaluation result of the facility, thereby supporting the evaluation of the facility.

  As described above, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 according to the embodiment, when the facility is a complex facility, the scatter diagram G determined from the value indicating the building performance of the facility and the value indicating the need / efficiency. In the upper arrangement position, it can be displayed in an identifiable manner that the facility is a complex facility. Specifically, for example, when the facility is a complex facility, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 can display the complex facility name of the complex facility at the arrangement position on the scatter diagram G. Further, for example, when the facility is a complex facility, the facility evaluation support apparatus 101 can display the facility name of the facility and the complex facility name of the complex facility at the arrangement position on the scatter diagram G.

  As a result, when evaluating a facility based on the relationship between the building performance of the facility and needs / efficiency (primary evaluation results), it is possible to grasp whether the facility is a complex facility, It is possible to prevent underestimation of complex facilities that are used for other than specific services.

  Further, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, when the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram G, the first evaluation flow corresponding to the first area can be displayed. Moreover, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, when the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram G, the facility secondary evaluation result based on the first evaluation flow can be further identified as the arrangement position. Can be displayed.

  Thereby, the secondary evaluation result of the facility based on the evaluation flow can be confirmed together with the contents of the evaluation flow according to the primary evaluation result of the facility. For this reason, the evaluator can evaluate the facility while referring to the secondary evaluation result obtained by evaluating the facility from the viewpoints of the installation purpose, the location environment, and the like for future direction examination.

  Further, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, the second evaluation corresponding to the second area is performed in accordance with the designation of the second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram G. It can be changed to a flow and displayed. Furthermore, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, the first evaluation flow is changed to the second evaluation flow in accordance with the designation of the second area, and the facility 2 based on the second evaluation flow is displayed. The next evaluation result can be displayed.

  Thereby, when the building performance of a facility, needs, and efficiency change, it can be checked how an evaluation flow and a secondary evaluation result change. For this reason, the evaluator can examine the future direction in anticipation of, for example, the case where the facility is renovated or rebuilt, or the need / efficiency of the facility is improved. In addition, the evaluator can examine future directions in anticipation of, for example, the case where the facility is deteriorated or the need / efficiency is lowered.

  From these things, according to the facility evaluation support apparatus 101, it can assist so that efficient facility management with respect to a facility can be performed.

  The facility evaluation support method described in this embodiment can be realized by executing a program prepared in advance on a computer such as a personal computer or a workstation. The facility evaluation support program is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium such as a hard disk, a flexible disk, a CD-ROM, an MO, and a DVD, and is executed by being read from the recording medium by the computer. The facility evaluation support program may be distributed through a network such as the Internet.

  The following additional notes are disclosed with respect to the embodiment described above.

(Supplementary note 1)
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
When the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the arrangement position on the scatter diagram is determined based on the first value and the second value. , Identifiably indicating that the facility is a complex facility,
Facility evaluation support program characterized by causing processing to be executed.

(Supplementary note 2) The facility evaluation support according to supplementary note 1, wherein displaying that the facility is a complex facility in an identifiable manner includes displaying the name of the complex facility at the arrangement position. program.

(Additional remark 3) Displaying that the said facility is a complex facility so that identification is possible includes displaying the name of the said facility and the name of the said complex facility in the said arrangement position. The facility evaluation support program according to 1 or 2.

(Supplementary note 4)
When the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow corresponding to the first area is displayed,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
The facility evaluation support program according to any one of appendices 1 to 3, wherein the process is executed.

(Supplementary note 5)
When the arrangement position belongs to the first area, the evaluation result of the facility based on the first evaluation flow is further displayed to be identifiable at the arrangement position.
The facility evaluation support program according to appendix 4, wherein the facility is executed.

(Supplementary Note 6) The process of changing to the second evaluation flow and displaying is as follows:
According to the designation of the second area, the first evaluation flow is changed to the second evaluation flow and displayed, and the evaluation result of the facility based on the second evaluation flow is displayed. The facility evaluation support program according to appendix 4 or 5, which is a feature.

(Appendix 7)
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
The first position corresponding to the first area when the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram. Display the evaluation flow,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
Facility evaluation support program characterized by causing processing to be executed.

(Appendix 8) The computer
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
When the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the arrangement position on the scatter diagram is determined based on the first value and the second value. , Identifiably indicating that the facility is a complex facility,
The facility evaluation support method characterized by performing a process.

(Supplementary note 9)
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
The first position corresponding to the first area when the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram. Display the evaluation flow,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
The facility evaluation support method characterized by performing a process.

(Supplementary Note 10) Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value related to a physical state of a facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value regarding the use status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility ,
When the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the arrangement position on the scatter diagram is determined based on the first value and the second value. , Identifiably indicating that the facility is a complex facility,
A facility evaluation support apparatus having a control unit.

(Supplementary Note 11) Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value related to a physical state of a facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value regarding the use status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility ,
The first position corresponding to the first area when the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram. Display the evaluation flow,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
A facility evaluation support apparatus having a control unit.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 101 Facility evaluation support apparatus 110 Storage part 130, G Scatter chart 200 Facility evaluation support system 201 Client apparatus 220 Facility information DB
230 Evaluation Flow DB
240 Evaluation item value DB
900 Condition input screen 1001 Reception unit 1002 Search unit 1003 Display control unit 1100 Portfolio screen 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 Facility evaluation sheet screen

Claims (9)

On the computer,
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
When the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the arrangement position on the scatter diagram is determined based on the first value and the second value. , Display in an identifiable manner that the facility is a complex facility ,
When the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow corresponding to the first area is displayed,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
Facility evaluation support program characterized by causing processing to be executed.   The facility evaluation support program according to claim 1, wherein displaying that the facility is a complex facility in an identifiable manner includes displaying the name of the complex facility at the arrangement position.   3. The identifiable display that the facility is a complex facility includes displaying the name of the facility and the name of the complex facility at the arrangement position. Facility evaluation support program described in 1. In the computer,
When the arrangement position belongs to the first area, the evaluation result of the facility based on the first evaluation flow is further displayed to be identifiable at the arrangement position.
The facility evaluation support program according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the process is executed. On the computer,
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
The first position corresponding to the first area when the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram. Display the evaluation flow,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
Facility evaluation support program characterized by causing processing to be executed. Computer
Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
When the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the arrangement position on the scatter diagram is determined based on the first value and the second value. , Display in an identifiable manner that the facility is a complex facility,
When the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow corresponding to the first area is displayed,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
The facility evaluation support method characterized by performing a process. Computer
  Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
  The first position corresponding to the first area when the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram. Display the evaluation flow,
  In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
  The facility evaluation support method characterized by performing a process. Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
When the facility is a complex facility used as a place for providing other services other than the specific service, the arrangement position on the scatter diagram is determined based on the first value and the second value. , Display in an identifiable manner that the facility is a complex facility,
When the arrangement position belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow corresponding to the first area is displayed,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
A facility evaluation support apparatus having a control unit. Obtaining a first value indicating an evaluation value relating to a physical state of the facility and a second value indicating an evaluation value relating to a usage status of a specific service provided at a location corresponding to the facility;
The first position corresponding to the first area when the arrangement position on the scatter diagram determined based on the first value and the second value belongs to the first area on the scatter diagram. Display the evaluation flow,
In response to designation of a second area different from the first area on the scatter diagram, the first evaluation flow is changed to a second evaluation flow corresponding to the second area and displayed.
A facility evaluation support apparatus having a control unit.

Images