JP6203569B2 - Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment - Google Patents

Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6203569B2
JP6203569B2 JP2013166100A JP2013166100A JP6203569B2 JP 6203569 B2 JP6203569 B2 JP 6203569B2 JP 2013166100 A JP2013166100 A JP 2013166100A JP 2013166100 A JP2013166100 A JP 2013166100A JP 6203569 B2 JP6203569 B2 JP 6203569B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
bridge
mobile device
damage state
imaging
aerial mobile
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2013166100A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2015034428A (en
Inventor
孝二 大田
孝二 大田
熊田 貴之
貴之 熊田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BLUE INNOVATION CO., LTD.
Original Assignee
BLUE INNOVATION CO., LTD.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BLUE INNOVATION CO., LTD. filed Critical BLUE INNOVATION CO., LTD.
Priority to JP2013166100A priority Critical patent/JP6203569B2/en
Publication of JP2015034428A publication Critical patent/JP2015034428A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6203569B2 publication Critical patent/JP6203569B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

この発明は、空中移動機器を用いて、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等の橋梁の損傷状態を調査・検査を行う空中移動機器を用いた橋梁の損傷状態調査システムおよび調査方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a bridge damage state investigation system and investigation using an aerial mobile device for investigating and inspecting the damage state of a bridge, such as cracks and damages, which occur in members constituting the bridge, using an aerial mobile device. It is about the method.

従来、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等の橋梁の損傷状態を調査する橋梁の損傷状態調査方法としては、特殊車両である橋梁点検車を用いて行われていた。   Conventionally, a bridge inspection vehicle, which is a special vehicle, has been used as a damage inspection method for a bridge to investigate the damage state of the bridge, such as cracks occurring in members constituting the bridge and the degree of damage.

図5に示すように、調査対象の橋梁100の上に停止している橋梁点検車101のデッキ部102に作業員が乗り込み、デッキ部102を移動させながら、目視やカメラで撮影しながら、橋梁点検を行っていた。   As shown in FIG. 5, an operator enters the deck section 102 of the bridge inspection vehicle 101 that is stopped on the bridge 100 to be investigated, moves the deck section 102, observes the image while taking a picture with a camera. We were checking.

特開2006−2417号公報JP 2006-2417 A

以上のように、従来の橋梁の損傷状態調査では、特殊車両である橋梁点検車101を橋梁に沿って、その橋梁全長移動して行うので、橋梁100周辺を交通規制する必要があり、自動車等の渋滞の原因となったり、特殊車両である橋梁点検車101の可動費用や作業員の作業費用等多くの費用を要するという問題点があった。   As described above, in the conventional damage state investigation on the bridge, the bridge inspection vehicle 101, which is a special vehicle, is moved along the bridge along the entire length of the bridge, so it is necessary to regulate traffic around the bridge 100. There is a problem that a lot of costs such as a moving cost of the bridge inspection vehicle 101 which is a special vehicle and a work cost of workers are required.

また、事前の警察への届出が不可欠な点等、複雑かつ多大な手続きと時間を必要とするという問題点もあった。   In addition, there was a problem that complicated procedures and a lot of time were required, such as the necessity of notifying the police in advance.

この発明は、以上の問題点を解決するために、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等、橋梁の損傷状態を、簡易に運用可能な無人の空中移動機器を用いて行い、橋梁周辺を交通規制必要もなく、低コストかつ簡単な作業で正確な橋梁の損傷状態の調査が行える橋梁の損傷状態調査システム、橋梁の損傷状態調査方法および空中移動機器を提供することを目的とするものである。   In order to solve the above problems, the present invention performs the damage state of the bridge, such as cracks generated in members constituting the bridge, the degree of damage, etc., using an unmanned aerial mobile device that can be easily operated, The purpose is to provide a bridge damage state investigation system, a bridge damage state investigation method, and an aerial mobile device that can accurately investigate the damage state of a bridge without the need for traffic control around the bridge and at low cost and with simple operations. To do.

この発明に係わる橋梁の損傷状態調査システムは、空中移動機器と、この空中移動機器に搭載された撮影装置と、前記空中移動機器に搭載され、前記撮影装置で撮影したデータを送信する撮影データ送信部と、前記空中移動機器に搭載され、点検対象部分である橋梁の損傷程度認識用に、寸法基準を提供する測定機能部とを備えたものである。   The bridge damage state investigation system according to the present invention includes an aerial mobile device, an imaging device mounted on the aerial mobile device, and imaging data transmission that is mounted on the aerial mobile device and transmits data captured by the imaging device. And a measurement function unit that is mounted on the aerial mobile device and provides a dimensional standard for recognizing the degree of damage to the bridge that is the inspection target portion.

この発明に係わる橋梁の損傷状態調査方法は、空中移動機器から送信されてきた、寸法基準付きの撮影データを受信し、リアルタイムに橋梁の損傷状態を調査可能とするものである。   The method for investigating the damage state of a bridge according to the present invention is capable of receiving photographing data with a dimensional standard transmitted from an aerial mobile device and investigating the damage state of the bridge in real time.

この発明に係わる空中移動機器は、撮影装置と、前記撮影装置で撮影したデータを送信する撮影データ送信部と、点検対象部分である橋梁の損傷程度認識用に、寸法基準を提供する測定機能部とを備えたものである。   An aerial mobile device according to the present invention includes an imaging device, an imaging data transmission unit that transmits data captured by the imaging device, and a measurement function unit that provides a dimensional reference for recognizing the degree of damage to a bridge that is an inspection target portion. It is equipped with.

以上のように、この発明によれば、空中移動機器を用いて、橋梁周辺を交通規制必要もなく、低コストかつ簡単な作業で迅速且つ正確な橋梁の損傷状態調査が行えるという効果が得られる。   As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to quickly and accurately investigate a damage state of a bridge with low cost and simple work without using traffic control around the bridge using an aerial mobile device. .

この発明は、デジタルカメラやビデオ等の撮影装置を備えた無人ヘリコプター等の空中移動機器を用いて、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等の橋梁の劣化状況を空中から直接撮影し、その撮影データを分析して、橋梁の損傷状態を調査するものである。   This invention uses an aerial mobile device such as an unmanned helicopter equipped with a digital camera or video camera, etc., and directly captures the deterioration of the bridge, such as cracks and damage, in the members that make up the bridge. The photographed data is analyzed to investigate the damage state of the bridge.

実施の形態1
以下、本発明における一実施形態について、図面を参照して説明する。
図1は、この空中移動機器を用いた橋梁の損傷状態調査方法の全体システム説明図を示す。
Embodiment 1
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 shows an overall system explanatory view of a method for investigating a damage state of a bridge using this aerial mobile device.

この橋梁の損傷状態調査システムは、軽量のカメラ、ビデオ等の撮影装置1を備えた無人ヘリコプター等の空中移動機器2と、この空中移動機器2を制御操作する操作システム部3と、空中移動機器2の撮影装置1からの撮像データを受信する受信装置4とを有する。   This bridge damage state investigation system includes an aerial mobile device 2 such as an unmanned helicopter equipped with a photographing device 1 such as a lightweight camera and video, an operation system unit 3 for controlling and operating the aerial mobile device 2, and an aerial mobile device. And a receiving device 4 that receives imaging data from the two imaging devices 1.

実施の形態1の構成
(1)空中移動機器2は、図2および図3に示すように、デジタルカメラ、ビデオ等の撮影装置1と、空中移動機器2の推進力を付与するローター5と、LEDライト等の照明部6と、撮影装置1で撮影したデータを送信する撮影データ送信部7と、レーザー光線等の照射手段を備え、点検対象部分のレーザー光線等の点と点の距離や、点の大きさを基準として点検対象部分である損傷の長さや大きさを推定したりする際に、寸法基準を提供する測定機能部8と、自動飛行制御用GPS9と接続された自動飛行制御装置10とを備えている。
Configuration of Embodiment 1 (1) The aerial mobile device 2 includes, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, a photographing device 1 such as a digital camera or a video, a rotor 5 that imparts a propulsive force of the aerial mobile device 2, An illumination unit 6 such as an LED light, an imaging data transmission unit 7 that transmits data captured by the imaging device 1, and an irradiation means such as a laser beam. A measurement function unit 8 that provides a dimensional reference when estimating the length or size of damage that is a part to be inspected based on the size, and an automatic flight control device 10 connected to the automatic flight control GPS 9; It has.

この空中移動機器2の撮影装置1によって、a.橋桁の下側(橋梁の桁の下フランジ下面)、b.橋桁の側面(正確には橋桁のウェブ面)、c.橋床版下面等を撮影しながら、橋梁の損傷状態調査を行うので、橋梁の点検対象部分を漏れのないように撮影するために、理想的には複数台設けられていることが好ましい。   By the photographing device 1 of the aerial mobile device 2, a. The underside of the bridge girder (the lower flange underside of the bridge girder), b. The side of the bridge girder (more precisely, the web side of the bridge girder), c. Since the damage state of the bridge is investigated while photographing the lower surface of the bridge deck, etc., it is ideally provided that a plurality of units are provided in order to photograph the inspection target portion of the bridge so as not to leak.

また、この撮影装置1として、例えば、赤外線カメラを採用した場合には、橋梁の点検対象部分の温度差も撮影したデータに含めることもできる、これによって、ひび割れ等の橋梁の損傷状態調査をより詳細に行うことができる。   In addition, for example, when an infrared camera is used as the photographing apparatus 1, the temperature difference of the inspection target portion of the bridge can also be included in the photographed data, which makes it possible to investigate the damage state of the bridge such as cracks. Can be done in detail.

また、空中移動機器2の撮影データ送信部7は、逐次、地上側の受信装置4に送信され、空中移動機器2の飛行中もリアルタイムで画像を確認することができる。   Further, the imaging data transmission unit 7 of the aerial mobile device 2 is sequentially transmitted to the receiving device 4 on the ground side, and can check images in real time even while the aerial mobile device 2 is flying.

なお、この実施の形態1では、空中移動機器2としてヘリコプターを例示して、説明をしているが、静止、あるいはごく低速度でブレのない撮影ができれば、無人ヘリコプター以外のいかなる空中移動機器であってもよい。   In the first embodiment, a helicopter is illustrated as an example of the aerial mobile device 2, but any aerial mobile device other than an unmanned helicopter can be used as long as it can be taken still or at a very low speed without blurring. There may be.

また、図2に示した空中移動機器2において、空中移動機器2の推進力を付与するローター5の周囲に、ローター5が橋梁に接触した場合にローター5の損傷を防止する、例えば、プラスチック製の保護カバー(図示せず)を設けることが好ましい。保護カバーを装着する場合には、撮影装置1の撮影を妨げないような位置及び形状のものを設ける必要がある。   Further, in the aerial mobile device 2 shown in FIG. 2, the rotor 5 is prevented from being damaged when the rotor 5 comes into contact with the bridge around the rotor 5 to which the propelling force of the aerial mobile device 2 is applied. It is preferable to provide a protective cover (not shown). When the protective cover is attached, it is necessary to provide a position and shape that does not hinder the photographing of the photographing apparatus 1.

(2)操作システム部3は、空中移動機器2を飛行制御する装置である。
通常は、地上側の調査員が空中移動機器2を目指しながら操作したり、さらに、地上側の受信装置4に送信されてきた撮像データをチェックしながら、空中移動機器2の操作を行うが、後述するように、空中移動機器2の自動飛行制御装置10により、飛行経路を自動化することも可能である。
(2) The operation system unit 3 is a device that controls the flight of the aerial mobile device 2.
Normally, the ground investigator operates while aiming at the aerial mobile device 2 and further operates the aerial mobile device 2 while checking the imaging data transmitted to the receiving device 4 on the ground side. As will be described later, the flight path can be automated by the automatic flight control device 10 of the aerial mobile device 2.

また、この操作システム部3は、空中移動機器2を安定的かつ静止、あるいはごく低速度で飛行させるために、外部からの電波などの影響が少ないという機能を有すれば、如何なる構成であってもよい。   In addition, the operation system unit 3 may have any configuration as long as it has a function of being less affected by external radio waves in order to make the aerial mobile device 2 fly stably and stationary or at a very low speed. Also good.

ここで、例えば、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷は1mm以下のものも存在するので、かなりの精度解像度と、空中移動機器2の安定的かつ静止、あるいはごく低速度な安定飛行が不可欠となる。   Here, for example, there are cracks and damages that occur in the members that make up the bridge, and those that are less than 1 mm exist, so there is considerable accuracy resolution and stable and stationary or very low-speed stable flight of the mobile equipment 2. Indispensable.

操縦能力や、風の吹き具合、および撮影装置1の性能により、橋梁と空中移動機器2の距離は変化し、一概には言えないが、例えば、橋桁の点検および撮影では、上記距離を1m程度の飛行を予定している。   The distance between the bridge and the aerial moving device 2 changes depending on the maneuverability, the wind blowing condition, and the performance of the photographing device 1 and cannot be generally stated. For example, in the inspection and photographing of a bridge girder, the distance is about 1 m. Is scheduled to fly.

(3)受信装置4は、空中移動機器2の撮影装置1からの撮像データを受信し、現場で画像再生できるものが好ましい。現場で画像再生しながら、小さな橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の疑いのある箇所を発見した場合には、当該箇所を重点調査出来ることが望ましい。 (3) The receiving device 4 is preferably capable of receiving image data from the imaging device 1 of the aerial mobile device 2 and reproducing an image on site. It is desirable to be able to conduct a focused investigation of cracks and parts that are suspected of being damaged while reconstructing images on the spot while generating cracks in parts that make up small bridges.

実施の形態1の作用効果
(1)点検対象部分の撮影手法について
a.撮影方法
出願人は過去の経験から多種多様な効果的な撮影方法を創出してきているが、例えば、空中移動機器2の測定機能部8からレーザー光線(例えば1mm直径の点を複数照射)を照射し、レーザー光線の点と点の距離を基準として、点検対象部分である損傷部分の長さを推定したり、点の大きさとの関連で、損傷部分が1mmより大きいか、小さいか、また、比較から0.5mm以下である等、ひび割れの大きさを判断する。
Effects of Embodiment 1 (1) Regarding the method of photographing the inspection target part a. Imaging method The applicant has created a variety of effective imaging methods based on past experience. For example, the measurement function unit 8 of the aerial mobile device 2 emits a laser beam (for example, a plurality of 1 mm diameter spots). Based on the distance between the points of the laser beam, the length of the damaged part that is the inspection target part is estimated, or the damaged part is larger or smaller than 1 mm in relation to the size of the point. Judge the size of the crack, such as 0.5 mm or less.

(2)撮像データの分析手法について
出願人は過去の経験から多種多様な効果的な分析手法のデータを有している。そこで、調査の過程で、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷が発見された場合、その撮像データから、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度を予測する。
以下、分析手法の一例について説明する。
(2) About the analysis method of imaging data The applicant has the data of various effective analysis methods from the past experience. Therefore, if cracks or damages are found in the members constituting the bridge during the investigation process, the cracks and damages occurring in the members constituting the bridge are predicted from the imaging data.
Hereinafter, an example of the analysis method will be described.

この分析手法は、受信装置4で受信した空中移動機器2の撮影装置1からの撮像データと、データベースに蓄積された橋梁の劣化傾向データとを比較して、自動的に橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等の橋梁の劣化状況や劣化度合いを認識し、橋梁の劣化状況や劣化度合いを算出するものである。
図4は、データベースAに蓄積された劣化傾向データ11a〜11eを示す。
11aは、劣化過程:潜伏期、 ひび割れの形態:橋軸直角方向ひび割れ
11bは、劣化過程:進展期、 ひび割れの形態:直交方向ひび割れ
11cは、劣化過程:加速期(前期)、ひび割れの形態:亀甲状ひび割れ
11dは、劣化過程:加速期(後期)、ひび割れの形態:角落ち・ひび割れのスリット
11eは、劣化過程:劣化期、 ひび割れの形態:抜け落ち

受信装置4で受信した空中移動機器2の撮影装置1からの撮像データは、地上側の情報処理装置の比較処理部(図示せず)によりデータベースAに蓄積された橋梁の劣化傾向データ11a〜11eと比較認識され、送信されてきた撮像データが、現場レベルにおいて簡易に、橋梁の劣化過程のどのレベルに該当するのかが判断されることとなる。
This analysis method compares the imaging data from the imaging device 1 of the aerial mobile device 2 received by the receiving device 4 with the deterioration tendency data of the bridge accumulated in the database, and automatically analyzes the data into the members that constitute the bridge. It recognizes the deterioration state and degree of deterioration of the bridge such as cracks and damages that occur, and calculates the deterioration state and degree of deterioration of the bridge.
FIG. 4 shows the deterioration tendency data 11a to 11e accumulated in the database A.
11a is deterioration process: incubation period, crack form: crack perpendicular to bridge axis 11b is deterioration process: progress stage, crack form: orthogonal crack 11c is deterioration process: acceleration period (early period), crack form: turtle shell 11d is a deterioration process: acceleration period (late stage), crack form: corner drop / crack slit 11e is deterioration process: deterioration stage, crack form: dropout

The imaging data from the imaging device 1 of the aerial mobile device 2 received by the receiving device 4 is the bridge deterioration tendency data 11a to 11e stored in the database A by the comparison processing unit (not shown) of the information processing device on the ground side. Thus, it is easily determined at which level the imaging data that has been recognized and transmitted corresponds to the degradation process of the bridge.

この処理装置の比較処理部は、例えば、具体的に劣化レベル判断(潜伏期、進展期、加速期(前期)、加速期(後期)、劣化期)の如何なるレベルに該当するのかを判断して提示するように構成されている。   The comparison processing unit of this processing apparatus, for example, specifically determines the degradation level judgment (latent period, progress period, acceleration period (previous period), acceleration period (late period), degradation period) and presents it. Is configured to do.

(3)最適な撮影効果を得るための空中移動機器2の移動方法
a.マニュアルによる空中移動機器2の操作及び撮影
上述のように、出願人は過去の経験から多種多様な効果的な橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等の劣化傾向データを有している。
(3) Moving method of the aerial moving device 2 for obtaining an optimum photographing effect a. As described above, as described above, the applicant has data on deterioration tendency such as cracks and damages that occur in members constituting various effective bridges based on past experience. Yes.

そこで、調査の過程で、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷が発見された場合には、橋梁を構成する部材に生じるひび割れや、損傷の程度等の相関性や劣化進行に関する進行方向や位置的劣化進行方向性等の損傷進行の劣化傾向データを利用して、空中移動機器2の撮影ポイントや撮影報告を予測して、空中移動機器2を移動させる。   Therefore, if cracks or damages are found in the members that make up the bridge during the investigation process, the cracks that occur in the members that make up the bridges, the degree of damage, etc. The aerial mobile device 2 is moved by predicting the shooting point and shooting report of the aerial mobile device 2 using the deterioration tendency data of the damage progress such as the positional degradation progress direction.

具体的には、空中移動機器2を制御操作する操作システム部3を上記劣化傾向データや報処理装置の比較処理部(図示せず)で判断された橋梁の劣化レベル判断(潜伏期、進展期、加速期(前期)、加速期(後期)、劣化期の該当レベル)に基づいて、操作して、空中移動機器2を移動させる。   Specifically, the operation system unit 3 for controlling and operating the aerial mobile device 2 is used to determine the deterioration level of the bridge (latent period, progress period, Based on the acceleration period (previous period), acceleration period (late period), and deterioration level), the aerial mobile device 2 is moved by operation.

b.地上側の情報処理装置の劣化レベル認識結果を利用した空中移動機器2の操作及び撮影
地上側の情報処理装置による劣化レベル判断を利用して、その後の飛行経路を、あらかじめ空中移動機器2の自動飛行制御装置10にインプットしておいた橋梁の劣化傾向データ報処理装置の比較処理部(図示せず)で判断された劣化レベル判断(潜伏期、進展期、加速期(前期)、加速期(後期)、劣化期の該当レベル)に基づいて、情報制御プログラムを作動させて、橋梁の点検対象部分の撮影密度をその重要度に対応させて自動化してもよい。
b. Operation and shooting of the aerial mobile device 2 using the degradation level recognition result of the ground side information processing device Using the degradation level judgment by the ground side information processing device, the subsequent flight path is automatically determined in advance by the aerial mobile device 2 Degradation level judgment (latent period, progress period, acceleration period (previous term), acceleration period (late term) judged by a comparison processing unit (not shown) of the bridge degradation tendency data report processing device input to the flight control device 10 ), The level corresponding to the deterioration period), the information control program may be operated, and the photographing density of the inspection target portion of the bridge may be automated in accordance with the importance.

例えば、橋梁の劣化レベルが潜伏期や進展期については、撮影を簡単にして、加速期以降を入念に撮影したり、劣化レベルの潜伏期や進展期と加速期以降の関係を重点的に撮影ポイントとしたり、調査目的に応じてプログラムを変更することも可能である。   For example, when the deterioration level of a bridge is in the latent period or the progress period, it is easy to shoot and carefully shoot after the acceleration period, or focus on the relationship between the latent period of the degradation level or the progress period and the acceleration period. It is also possible to change the program according to the purpose of the survey.

c.また、自動飛行制御装置10の自動飛行制御用GPS9を作動させ、その飛行経路を一部自動化して、空中移動機器2と橋梁との衝突等の不測の事態を回避したり、効率的な撮影が得られるようにしてもよい。 c. In addition, the automatic flight control GPS 9 of the automatic flight control device 10 is operated to partially automate the flight path to avoid unexpected situations such as a collision between the aerial mobile device 2 and a bridge, or to perform efficient shooting. May be obtained.

また、自動飛行制御用GPS9を利用した自動飛行制御装置10による飛行経路に加え、事前に橋の設計図のデータを空中移動機器2の自動飛行制御装置10にインプットして、飛行経路をデータ制御してもよい。   In addition to the flight route by the automatic flight control device 10 using the automatic flight control GPS 9, the bridge design drawing data is input to the automatic flight control device 10 of the aerial mobile device 2 in advance to control the flight route. May be.

さらに、自動飛行制御用GPS9を利用した自動飛行制御装置10には、事前に橋の設計図のデータとともに、橋桁の間での撮影重要ポイントやどのように撮影装置1のシャッタ作動位置、フォーカス位置、拡大撮影位置倍率、撮影時間等を行うか等を詳細にインプットして、飛行経路のみならず、撮影条件までもデータ制御してもよい。   Further, the automatic flight control device 10 using the automatic flight control GPS 9 includes, in advance, data of the bridge design drawing, important photographing points between the bridge girders, how the shutter operating position of the photographing device 1, and the focus position. Further, it is possible to input in detail whether to perform magnification of the shooting position, shooting time, etc., and to control data not only for the flight path but also for shooting conditions.

(4)最適な撮影効果を得るための空中移動機器2の測定機能部8による照射方法
上述の上記劣化傾向データや報処理装置の比較処理部(図示せず)で判断された劣化レベル判断(潜伏期、進展期、加速期(前期)、加速期(後期)、劣化期の該当レベル)に基づいて、測定機能部8によるレーザー光線照射方法を最適に照射するように、測定機能部8の照射光線の種類や大きさを、測定機能部8プログラミングしてもよい。
(4) Irradiation method by the measurement function unit 8 of the aerial mobile device 2 for obtaining an optimal photographing effect Deterioration level determination (determined by the above-described deterioration tendency data and the comparison processing unit (not shown) of the information processing apparatus ( Irradiation light of the measurement function unit 8 so as to optimally irradiate the laser beam irradiation method by the measurement function unit 8 based on the incubation period, progress period, acceleration period (first period), acceleration period (late period), deterioration period) The measurement function unit 8 may be programmed with respect to the type and size.

例えば、劣化レベルが潜伏期や進展期については、レーザー光線の点と点の距離を通常にして、加速期以降の損傷部分をより詳細に調査するために、レーザー光線照射間隔(例えば0.5mm〜1mm直径の点を複数照射)とすることも可能である。   For example, when the deterioration level is the incubation period or the development period, the distance between the laser beam points is usually set, and the laser beam irradiation interval (for example, 0.5 mm to 1 mm in diameter) is used to investigate in detail the damaged part after the acceleration period. It is also possible to irradiate a plurality of points.

実施の形態1の効果
以上のように、この実施の形態1によれば、空中移動機器を用いて、橋梁周辺を交通規制する必要もなく、低コストのかつ簡単な作業で正確な橋梁の損傷状態調査が行えるという効果が得られる。
As described above, according to the first embodiment, it is not necessary to control traffic around the bridge using an aerial mobile device, and the bridge damage can be accurately performed with low cost and simple work. The effect that a state investigation can be performed is acquired.

なお、上記実施の形態1では、空中移動機器を用いた橋梁の損傷状態調査システムおよび調査方法を中心に説明したが、本発明は、この分野に何ら限定されることはなく、橋梁やその他建築物一般の鋼桁の腐食調査や、鋼材の接続部の亀裂等に適用できることはもちろんである。   In the first embodiment, the bridge damage state investigation system and the investigation method using the aerial mobile device have been mainly described. However, the present invention is not limited to this field, and the bridge and other constructions are not limited. Of course, it can be applied to corrosion inspection of general steel girders and cracks in the connection part of steel materials.

この実施の形態1に係わる橋梁の損傷状態調査方法の全体システム説明図Whole system explanatory drawing of the damage state investigation method of the bridge concerning this Embodiment 1 この実施の形態1に係わる空中移動機器2の平面概要説明図Plane outline explanatory drawing of the aerial mobile device 2 concerning this Embodiment 1. FIG. この実施の形態1に係わる空中移動機器2の側面概要説明図Side surface explanatory drawing of the aerial mobile device 2 concerning this Embodiment 1. FIG. データベースAに蓄積された劣化傾向データの説明図Illustration of deterioration trend data stored in database A 従来の橋梁点検作業を説明する説明図Explanatory drawing explaining conventional bridge inspection work

1:撮影装置
2:空中移動機器
3:操作システム部
4:受信装置4
5:ローター
7:撮影データ送信部
6:照明部
8:測定機能部
9:自動飛行制御用GPS
10:自動飛行制御装置
1: Image pickup device 2: Aerial mobile device 3: Operation system unit 4: Receiver 4
5: Rotor 7: Image data transmission unit 6: Illumination unit 8: Measurement function unit 9: GPS for automatic flight control
10: Automatic flight control device

Claims (4)

空中移動機器と、この空中移動機器に搭載された撮影装置と、前記空中移動機器に搭載され、前記撮影装置で撮影したデータを送信する撮影データ送信部と、前記空中移動機器に搭載され、点検対象部分である橋梁の損傷程度認識用に、寸法基準を提供する測定機能部と、前記撮影したデータとデータベースに蓄積された橋梁の劣化傾向データとを比較して、判断された劣化レベル判断に基づいて、前記空中移動機器の飛行経路を制御する自動飛行制御装置と、を備えた橋梁の損傷状態調査システム。 Airborne mobile device, imaging device mounted on the airborne mobile device, imaging data transmitter mounted on the airborne mobile device for transmitting data captured by the imaging device, and mounted on the airborne mobile device for inspection In order to recognize the damage level of the bridge that is the target part, the measurement function part that provides the dimensional standard is compared with the image data and the deterioration tendency data of the bridge stored in the database to determine the determined deterioration level. A bridge damage state investigation system comprising: an automatic flight control device that controls a flight path of the aerial mobile device . 前記撮影データ送信部からの撮像データを受信する地上側の受信装置を備えたことを特徴とする請求項1項記載の橋梁の損傷状態調査システム。   The bridge damage state investigation system according to claim 1, further comprising a ground-side receiving device that receives imaging data from the imaging data transmission unit. 空中移動機器と、この空中移動機器に搭載された撮影装置と、前記空中移動機器に搭載され、前記撮影装置で撮影したデータを送信する撮影データ送信部と、前記空中移動機器に搭載され、点検対象部分である橋梁の損傷程度認識用に、寸法基準を提供する測定機能部と、前記撮影したデータとデータベースに蓄積された橋梁の劣化傾向データとを比較して、判断された劣化レベル判断に基づいて、前記測定機能部を制御する測定機能部制御部と、備えた橋梁の損傷状態調査システム。 Airborne mobile device, imaging device mounted on the airborne mobile device, imaging data transmitter mounted on the airborne mobile device for transmitting data captured by the imaging device, and mounted on the airborne mobile device for inspection In order to recognize the damage level of the bridge that is the target part, the measurement function part that provides the dimensional standard is compared with the image data and the deterioration tendency data of the bridge stored in the database to determine the determined deterioration level. And a measurement function unit control unit for controlling the measurement function unit, and a bridge damage state investigation system provided. 前記撮影データ送信部からの撮像データを受信する地上側の受信装置を備えたことを特徴とする請求項3項記載の橋梁の損傷状態調査システム。The bridge damage state investigation system according to claim 3, further comprising a ground-side receiving device that receives imaging data from the imaging data transmission unit.
JP2013166100A 2013-08-09 2013-08-09 Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment Active JP6203569B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013166100A JP6203569B2 (en) 2013-08-09 2013-08-09 Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013166100A JP6203569B2 (en) 2013-08-09 2013-08-09 Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2015034428A JP2015034428A (en) 2015-02-19
JP6203569B2 true JP6203569B2 (en) 2017-09-27

Family

ID=52543151

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013166100A Active JP6203569B2 (en) 2013-08-09 2013-08-09 Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6203569B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017015527A (en) * 2015-06-30 2017-01-19 株式会社トプコン Wide area sensor system, flight detection method and program
JP6499542B2 (en) * 2015-08-05 2019-04-10 ローム株式会社 Inspection method of structure
JP6636778B2 (en) * 2015-11-10 2020-01-29 川田テクノロジーズ株式会社 Floating inspection device and inspection system equipped with it
CN105401531A (en) * 2015-11-20 2016-03-16 上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司 Viaduct support inspection system based on multi-rotor aircraft
JP2017132333A (en) * 2016-01-27 2017-08-03 Ntn株式会社 Unmanned movable body and inspection method using unmanned movable body
KR101754137B1 (en) * 2016-03-21 2017-07-19 한국철도기술연구원 Methode for monitoring structure and structure monitoring system
KR101993881B1 (en) * 2017-08-24 2019-06-27 주식회사 포스코건설 Method and apparatus for deterioration diagnosis of structure surface based on deep learning
KR101994412B1 (en) * 2017-09-08 2019-06-28 주식회사 포스코건설 Apparatus and method for deterioration diagnosis of structure surface using unmanned aerial vehicle and sensor interface
JP7315159B2 (en) * 2018-11-13 2023-07-26 オリエンタル白石株式会社 Structure inspection system
KR102100496B1 (en) * 2019-05-02 2020-04-13 케이에스엠기술 주식회사 System and method for finding crack in concrete using drone and laser scanner

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60133106A (en) * 1983-12-21 1985-07-16 北海道開発局建設機械工作所長 Bridge inspecting car
JP3342581B2 (en) * 1994-07-26 2002-11-11 株式会社防蝕エンジニアリング Automatic coating film deterioration diagnosis method and apparatus
JPH1082017A (en) * 1996-09-06 1998-03-31 Toshiba Eng Co Ltd Structure inspection device
JP2012228919A (en) * 2011-04-25 2012-11-22 Shinpo Sukeyuki Unmanned floating observation device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2015034428A (en) 2015-02-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6203569B2 (en) Bridge damage state investigation system, bridge damage state investigation method and aerial mobile equipment
JP7045030B2 (en) Inspection system, inspection method, server equipment, and program
JP7030431B2 (en) Inspection support system and inspection support control program
JP6039050B1 (en) Inspection method for structures using drone
JP6569114B2 (en) Inspection system and inspection method
JP6581839B2 (en) Structure inspection method
JP6484695B1 (en) Ship block joint welding defect marking method
WO2017169516A1 (en) Unmanned flying device control system, unmanned flying device control method, and inspection device
JP2017154577A (en) Inspection system for inside of facility using unmanned aircraft
KR20140029394A (en) A surveillance system and a method for detecting a foreign object, debris, or damage in an airfield
JP6802599B1 (en) Inspection system
CN109665099B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle and overhead line shooting method
US11430101B2 (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle, inspection method, and storage medium
JP4375725B2 (en) Transmission line inspection system and method using unmanned air vehicle
AU2015367226B2 (en) Imaging system
WO2016024303A1 (en) Nondestructive concrete-structure inspection system
JP6707933B2 (en) Unmanned flight device control system, unmanned flight device control method, and unmanned flight device
CN109358058B (en) Pipeline state detection system and method
WO2019244425A1 (en) Obstacle detection system and obstacle detection method
KR101600993B1 (en) Geo-pointing accuracy and automatic picture-taking test devices and methodology of the airborne eo/ir payload
KR102192686B1 (en) Drone controlling system for checking of facility, and method for the same
KR20200143161A (en) Safety Inspection Method of Structure Using Drone with Simultaneous Localization and Mapping
KR101590889B1 (en) Target position estimation equipment using imaging sensors for analyzing an accuracy of target tracking method
EP3767417A1 (en) Method of performing an inspection and an airborne system therefore
JP2021014241A (en) Unmanned aircraft, image photographing system and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20160708

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20170418

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20170523

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20170718

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20170801

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20170830

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6203569

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250