JP6202362B2 - Diagnostic agents and methods for predicting local recurrence risk after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy - Google Patents

Diagnostic agents and methods for predicting local recurrence risk after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6202362B2
JP6202362B2 JP2013041644A JP2013041644A JP6202362B2 JP 6202362 B2 JP6202362 B2 JP 6202362B2 JP 2013041644 A JP2013041644 A JP 2013041644A JP 2013041644 A JP2013041644 A JP 2013041644A JP 6202362 B2 JP6202362 B2 JP 6202362B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
breast
breast cancer
local recurrence
therapy
risk
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2013041644A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2014169917A (en
Inventor
壽孝 佐邊
壽孝 佐邊
橋本 茂
茂 橋本
あり 橋本
あり 橋本
康仁 小野寺
康仁 小野寺
博樹 白土
博樹 白土
留美子 木下
留美子 木下
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hokkaido University NUC
Original Assignee
Hokkaido University NUC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hokkaido University NUC filed Critical Hokkaido University NUC
Priority to JP2013041644A priority Critical patent/JP6202362B2/en
Publication of JP2014169917A publication Critical patent/JP2014169917A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6202362B2 publication Critical patent/JP6202362B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)

Description

本発明は、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いるための診断薬及びキット、並びに乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a diagnostic agent and kit for use in predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, and a method for predicting the local recurrence risk after breast cancer-preserving therapy.

近年、早期乳癌の治療においては、乳房温存療法(Breast conservation therapy;BCT)が広く承認された標準的な治療方法として確立されている(非特許文献1−3)。乳房温存療法は、腫瘍摘出術、及びそれに続く乳房全体への放射線照射療法、並びに化学療法やホルモン療法等の補助療法からなる治療法である。乳房温存療法は、患者の生活の質(Quality of life)をも考慮して、文字通り乳房を可能な限り温存することを目的とするものである。その治療法は、乳腺内の視認可能な病巣部だけを外科手術により切除し、組織生検により病巣部の取り残しが無いことを確認しつつ、細胞レベルで取り残した病巣部位は術後の放射線照射により根絶し、さらに乳房以外に存在し得るかもしれない微小転移巣は補助療法により根絶すると云う原理に基づく。しかしながら、このような原理に基づく乳癌温存療法であっても、8.8〜20%の患者に乳房内局所再発が見られるのが現状である(非特許文献1−3)。   In recent years, breast conservation therapy (BCT) has been established as a widely approved standard treatment method for the treatment of early breast cancer (Non-Patent Documents 1-3). Breast-conserving therapy is a treatment method comprising tumorectomy followed by radiation therapy to the entire breast, and adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Breast-conserving therapy literally aims to preserve the breast as much as possible, taking into account the patient's quality of life. The treatment method is to remove only the visible lesion in the mammary gland by surgical operation, and confirm that there is no leftover of the lesion by tissue biopsy. It is based on the principle that micrometastasis that may have been eradicated by aging, and possibly other than breast, is eradicated by adjuvant therapy. However, even in breast cancer preserving therapy based on such a principle, 8.8-20% of patients have a local recurrence in the breast (Non-patent Documents 1-3).

過去の報告によれば、年齢、Ki−67抗原レベル、細胞増殖の核マーカー等の幾つかの因子が、乳癌温存療法後の局所再発に関するリスク因子として確認されている(非特許文献4)。さらに、乳癌の遺伝子発現シグナチュアに基づいて分類される、乳癌の5つの分子サブタイプ(即ち、"Luminal A-like"、"Luminal B-like"、"HER2-enriched"、"basal-like"及び"normal-like")に応じて、乳癌温存療法後の再発頻度が変化することも報告されている(非特許文献5及び6)。さらに、外科手術による切除断端の状態(margin status)、結節状態(nodal status)、及び腫瘍悪性度(tumor grade)も、乳癌温存療法後の局所再発の頻度に相関することが報告されている(非特許文献7及び8)。   According to past reports, several factors such as age, Ki-67 antigen level, nuclear markers of cell proliferation and the like have been confirmed as risk factors for local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy (Non-patent Document 4). In addition, the five molecular subtypes of breast cancer (ie, “Luminal A-like”, “Luminal B-like”, “HER2-enriched”, “basal-like”) and categorized based on breast cancer gene expression signatures. It has also been reported that the frequency of recurrence after breast cancer-preserving therapy changes according to "normal-like") (Non-patent Documents 5 and 6). In addition, surgical margin status, nodal status, and tumor grade have also been reported to correlate with the frequency of local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy. (Non-Patent Documents 7 and 8).

さらに、乳癌の遠隔転移及び全生存率の予測に関する臨床病理学的評価に有用であるとされる、70遺伝子のクラスターからなる遺伝子発現シグナチュアに基づく乳癌再発診断法「マンマプリント」"MammaPrint"(Agendia社、アムステルダム、オランダ)が開発されており、この診断法は米国食品医薬品局に承認されている(非特許文献9、10及び11)。一方、「マンマプリント」では局所再発は予測できないこと(正答率18%)も示されている(Kreike et al., Clin Cancer Res 15: 4181-4190, 2009)。   Furthermore, the breast cancer recurrence diagnostic method “MammaPrint” (Agendia) based on a gene expression signature consisting of a cluster of 70 genes, said to be useful for clinicopathological evaluation regarding the prediction of distant metastasis and overall survival of breast cancer. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), and this diagnostic method has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (Non-Patent Documents 9, 10 and 11). On the other hand, "Mammaprint" also shows that local recurrence cannot be predicted (correct response rate 18%) (Kreike et al., Clin Cancer Res 15: 4181-4190, 2009).

遺伝子発現プロファイルのデータセットを解析することにより、傷応答性シグナチュア(wound-response signature)(非特許文献12)が、乳癌温存療法後の局所再発に有意に相関することも報告されている(非特許文献13)。しかし、このシグナチュアはその後、同一研究グループにより否定されている (Kreike et al., Clin Cancer Res 15: 4181-4190, 2009)。   It has also been reported that wound-response signature (Non-Patent Document 12) is significantly correlated with local recurrence after breast cancer-preserving therapy by analyzing a gene expression profile data set (non-patent document 12). Patent Document 13). However, this signature has since been denied by the same research group (Kreike et al., Clin Cancer Res 15: 4181-4190, 2009).

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233-41, 2002Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.N Engl J Med 347: 1233-41, 2002 Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227-32, 2002Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.N Engl J Med 347: 1227-32, 2002 Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al: Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1143-50, 2000Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al: Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 1143-50, 2000 Elkhuizen PH, Voogd AC, van den Broek LC, et al: Risk factors for local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for invasive carcinomas: a case-control study of histological factors and alterations in oncogene expression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:73-83, 1999Elkhuizen PH, Voogd AC, van den Broek LC, et al: Risk factors for local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for invasive carcinomas: a case-control study of histological factors and alterations in oncogene expression.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45: 73-83, 1999 Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS, et al: Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 26:2373-8, 2008Nguyen PL, Taghian AG, Katz MS, et al: Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 26: 2373-8, 2008 Millar EK, Graham PH, O'Toole SA, et al: Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol 27:4701-8, 2009Millar EK, Graham PH, O'Toole SA, et al: Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel.J Clin Oncol 27: 4701- 8, 2009 Jones HA, Antonini N, Hart AA, et al: Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial. J Clin Oncol 27:4939-47, 2009Jones HA, Antonini N, Hart AA, et al: Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial.J Clin Oncol 27: 4939-47, 2009 Kunkler IH, Kerr GR, Thomas JS, et al: Impact of screening and risk factors for local recurrence and survival after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer: results from a large series with long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:829-38, 2012Kunkler IH, Kerr GR, Thomas JS, et al: Impact of screening and risk factors for local recurrence and survival after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer: results from a large series with long-term follow-up.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83: 829-38, 2012 van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, et al: A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999-2009, 2002van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, et al: A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.N Engl J Med 347: 1999-2009, 2002 van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530-6, 2002van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.Nature 415: 530-6, 2002 Buyse M, Loi S, van't Veer L, et al: Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183-92, 2006Buyse M, Loi S, van't Veer L, et al: Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst 98: 1183-92, 2006 Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB, et al: Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:3738-43, 2005Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB, et al: Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 3738-43, 2005 Nuyten DS, Kreike B, Hart AA, et al: Predicting a local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy by gene expression profiling. Breast Cancer Res 8:R62, 2006Nuyten DS, Kreike B, Hart AA, et al: Predicting a local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy by gene expression profiling.Breast Cancer Res 8: R62, 2006

上述の通り、非特許文献4〜8には、乳癌温存療法後の局所再発に関するリスク因子各種が記載されているものの、これらリスク因子に基づいて臨床の現場に応用出来る乳癌温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測することは出来なかった(上述)。   As described above, Non-Patent Documents 4 to 8 describe various risk factors related to local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy, but local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy that can be applied to clinical settings based on these risk factors. Risk could not be predicted (described above).

さらに、非特許文献9〜11に記載される乳癌再発診断法は、乳癌の再発一般を対象にするものであって、特に乳癌温存療法後における局所再発の予測を可能にする技術では無い。
さらに、非特許文献12及び13に記載の技術については、それ以降、大規模な患者群に基づく臨床試験の調査もされておらず、その有用性は定かではない。
Furthermore, breast cancer recurrence diagnosis methods described in Non-Patent Documents 9 to 11 are intended for general recurrence of breast cancer, and are not technologies that enable prediction of local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy.
Furthermore, since the techniques described in Non-Patent Documents 12 and 13 have not been investigated since then, clinical trials based on large-scale patient groups have not been made, and their usefulness is not clear.

そこで、本発明の課題は、乳癌の温存療法後における局所再発リスクを予測できる予測診断薬並びに予測方法を提供することにある。   Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a predictive diagnostic agent and a prediction method capable of predicting a local recurrence risk after breast cancer preservation therapy.

本発明者らは、上記課題を解決するため鋭意検討した結果、Arf6経路に属する特定の遺伝子群のうち少なくとも2以上の遺伝子の共発現が乳癌温存療法後における局所再発に有意に相関することを見出した。本発明は、係る知見により完成されたものである。   As a result of intensive studies to solve the above problems, the present inventors have found that the co-expression of at least two genes among the specific gene group belonging to the Arf6 pathway is significantly correlated with local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy. I found it. The present invention has been completed based on such knowledge.

即ち、本発明は以下に関する。   That is, the present invention relates to the following.

〔1〕 乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いるための診断薬であって、
AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−Metからなる群から選択されるいずれか1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドを含有する、診断薬。
〔2〕 上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが、抗体及び/又はその断片である、〔1〕に記載の診断薬。
〔3〕 乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いるためのキットであって、〔1〕又は〔2〕に記載の診断薬を含む、キット。
〔4〕 上記診断薬が、以下の(i)〜(ii)の組合せのいずれかの2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物のそれぞれを特異的に検出できる2つの診断薬を含む、〔3〕に記載のキット:
(i)AMAP1及びGEP100、並びに
(ii)EBL5及びC−Met。
〔5〕 (A)乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた患者から採取した生体試料において、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−Metから成る群から選択される少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定すること;並びに
(B)工程(A)において決定した翻訳産物発現レベルに基づいて、上記患者の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測すること、
を含む、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法。
〔6〕 工程(A)における上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子が以下の(i)〜(ii)の組合せの何れかである、〔5〕に記載の方法:
(i)AMAP1及びGEP100、並びに
(ii)EBL5及びC−Met。
〔7〕 上記生体試料が乳房組織である、〔5〕又は〔6〕に記載の方法。
〔8〕 工程(A)において、上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルが、それら遺伝子の翻訳産物をそれぞれ特異的に認識可能なタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドを用いた免疫組織化学法により決定される、〔5〕から〔7〕の何れかに記載の方法。
〔9〕 上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが抗体及び/又はその断片である、〔8〕に記載の方法。
〔10〕工程(A)において、上記患者の非癌性乳房組織における上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物それぞれの発現レベルを対照として上記生体試料における上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルを決定し、かつ工程(B)において、以下の判断基準により上記患者の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する、〔5〕から〔9〕の何れかに記載の方法:
(i)工程(A)において決定した上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルの全てが、対応する対照の発現レベルよりも高い場合には、上記患者は乳癌の局所再発リスクが高いと予測する;又は
(ii)工程(A)において決定した上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルのうち一つでも、対応する対照の発現レベルよりも低いか、若しくは同等である場合には、上記患者は乳癌の局所再発リスクが低いと予測する。
[1] A diagnostic agent for use in predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy,
A diagnostic agent comprising a protein and / or polypeptide capable of specifically recognizing a translation product of any one gene selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-Met.
[2] The diagnostic agent according to [1], wherein the protein and / or polypeptide is an antibody and / or a fragment thereof.
[3] A kit for use in predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, comprising the diagnostic agent according to [1] or [2].
[4] The diagnostic agent according to [3], wherein the diagnostic agent comprises two diagnostic agents capable of specifically detecting each of translation products of two genes of any of the combinations (i) to (ii) below: kit:
(I) AMAP1 and GEP100, and (ii) EBL5 and C-Met.
[5] (A) Determination of translation product expression levels of at least two genes selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-Met in biological samples collected from patients who have received breast cancer breast-conserving therapy And (B) predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy for the patient based on the translation product expression level determined in step (A),
Predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer.
[6] The method according to [5], wherein the at least two genes in step (A) are any of the following combinations (i) to (ii):
(I) AMAP1 and GEP100, and (ii) EBL5 and C-Met.
[7] The method according to [5] or [6], wherein the biological sample is breast tissue.
[8] In step (A), the translation product expression levels of the at least two genes are determined by an immunohistochemical method using a protein and / or polypeptide capable of specifically recognizing the translation products of the genes. The method according to any one of [5] to [7].
[9] The method according to [8], wherein the protein and / or polypeptide is an antibody and / or a fragment thereof.
[10] In step (A), the expression levels of the translation products of the at least two genes in the biological sample are determined using the expression levels of the translation products of the at least two genes in the non-cancerous breast tissue of the patient as controls. And in step (B), the method according to any one of [5] to [9], wherein the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy of the patient is predicted according to the following criteria:
(I) if all of the translation product expression levels of the at least two genes determined in step (A) are higher than the expression levels of the corresponding controls, the patient is predicted to have a high risk of local recurrence of breast cancer Or (ii) if one of the translation product expression levels of the at least two genes determined in step (A) is lower than or equivalent to the expression level of the corresponding control, the patient is Predict that the risk of local recurrence of breast cancer is low.

本発明によれば、乳癌温存療法後における局所再発リスクを精度良く予測可能である。その結果、乳癌局所再発リスクを考慮した治療計画の決定が可能になり、乳癌温存療法後における局所再発を効果的に防止することが可能となる。また、従来の乳癌温存療法においては病変部位の生検組織試料に基づく病理診断が為されている。本発明によれば、その病理診断と同時に、それら生検組織試料において所定の遺伝子翻訳産物の発現を検出すれば実施可能である。そのため、本発明によれば、患者への負担も少なく、かつ簡便に乳癌温存療法後における局所再発リスクを予測することが可能である。   According to the present invention, it is possible to accurately predict the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy. As a result, it becomes possible to determine a treatment plan in consideration of the risk of local recurrence of breast cancer, and to effectively prevent local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy. Further, in conventional breast cancer preservation therapy, pathological diagnosis based on a biopsy tissue sample of a lesion site is performed. According to the present invention, it can be carried out by detecting the expression of a predetermined gene translation product in these biopsy tissue samples simultaneously with the pathological diagnosis. Therefore, according to the present invention, it is possible to predict the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer preserving therapy with little burden on the patient and easily.

実施例において取得した免疫組織化学染色の顕微鏡写真を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the microscope picture of the immunohistochemical staining acquired in the Example. 実施例において取得した免疫組織化学染色の顕微鏡写真を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the microscope picture of the immunohistochemical staining acquired in the Example. AMAP1及びGEP100の共発現と乳癌乳房温存療法の完了から局所再発までの期間との相関関係を調べた結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having investigated the correlation with co-expression of AMAP1 and GEP100, and the period from completion of breast cancer breast preservation therapy to local recurrence. c−MET及びEBL5の共発現と乳癌乳房温存療法の完了から局所再発までの期間との相関関係を調べた結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having investigated the correlation with co-expression of c-MET and EBL5, and the period from completion of breast cancer breast preservation therapy to local recurrence. 各種パラメータと乳癌乳房温存療法の完了から局所再発までの期間との相関関係を調べた結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having investigated the correlation with various parameters and the period from completion of breast cancer breast preservation therapy to local recurrence.

診断薬
本発明の一の態様によれば、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いるための診断薬であって、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−Metからなる群から選択されるいずれか1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドを含有する、診断薬が提供される。
Diagnostic Agent According to one aspect of the present invention, a diagnostic agent for use in predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-Met A diagnostic agent containing a protein and / or polypeptide capable of specifically recognizing the translation product of any one gene is provided.

本発明において、「乳癌乳房温存療法」とは、乳房温存療法腫瘍摘出術とそれに続く乳房全体への放射線照射療法を含む治療法である。より具体的には、乳癌乳房温存療法は、乳腺内の視認可能な病巣部だけを外科手術により切除し、組織生検により病巣部の取り残しが無いことを確認しつつ、上記外科手術後に病巣側乳房全体に予防的処置としての放射線照射療を行う療法であり得る。加えて、乳癌乳房温存療法は、任意に化学療法やホルモン療法等の補助療法も含み得る。乳癌乳房温存療法は、文字通り乳房を温存することにより患者の生活の質(Quality of life)を向上させることを目的とするものであり、当該技術分野において早期乳癌に対して広く承認された標準的な治療方法である。   In the present invention, “breast cancer breast-conserving therapy” is a treatment method including breast-conserving therapy tumor excision followed by radiation therapy to the entire breast. More specifically, breast cancer breast-conserving therapy is performed by surgically removing only a visible lesion in the mammary gland and confirming that there is no leftover by tissue biopsy. The therapy may be radiation therapy as a preventive treatment for the entire breast. In addition, breast cancer breast-conserving therapy can optionally include adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Breast cancer breast-conserving therapy is literally aimed at improving the patient's quality of life by preserving the breast, and is a standard that has been widely approved for early breast cancer in the art. It is a proper treatment method.

本発明において、「局所再発リスク」とは、乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた患者が、当該治療の完了後に乳房内に癌を再発するリスクを意味する。局所再発リスクは、乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた後、例えば、5年以内の早期再発リスクを主に意味する。但し、乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた後5年を超え、10年以内の中期再発リスク、あるいは10年を超える後期再発リスクを含み得る。   In the present invention, the “local recurrence risk” means the risk that a patient who has received breast cancer breast-conserving therapy will relapse cancer in the breast after the treatment is completed. Local recurrence risk primarily means the risk of early recurrence, for example, within 5 years after receiving breast cancer breast-conserving therapy. However, it may include a medium-term recurrence risk of more than 5 years after receiving breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, or a recurrence risk of more than 10 years, or more than 10 years.

「局所再発リスクの予測」の方法については、「予測方法」において後述する。
本発明の治療薬が、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いることができることは、後述する実施例で示される通り、乳癌乳房温存療法を受け、かつその後乳癌が局所再発した患者群において、乳房組織で特定遺伝子の組合せの翻訳産物発現が見られる患者は、乳房組織で当該特定遺伝子の組合せの翻訳産物発現が見られない患者と比較して、統計的に乳癌乳房温存療法後、比較的早期(例えば、5年以内)に乳癌が局所再発する事が統計的有意さを持って示される。特定遺伝子の組合せとは、具体的には、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−METから成る群から選択される少なくとも2つの遺伝子であり、特にAMAP1及びGEP100の組合せ、又はEBL5及びc−Metの組合せの組合せで翻訳産物発現が見られる患者は統計的有意さを持って局所再発するリスクが高い。即ち、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法について後述する通り、乳房組織において上記遺伝子の組合せの翻訳産物の発現が一定レベルで認められる場合、当該患者は乳癌乳房温存療法後に乳癌を早期に局所再発するリスクが高いと予測される。このように、本発明において「乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測」とは、乳房組織における上記特定遺伝子の組合せの翻訳産物の発現を検出することを前提としていることから、当該予測に用いるための本発明の診断薬は、具体的にはそれら遺伝子翻訳産物の検出に用いるための試薬であって、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−Metからなる群から選択されるいずれか1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物を特定的に認識可能なタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドを含有するものである。
The method of “prediction of local recurrence risk” will be described later in “Prediction method”.
The therapeutic agent of the present invention can be used for the prediction of the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, as shown in Examples described later, a group of patients who have received breast cancer breast-conserving therapy and subsequently undergoes local recurrence of breast cancer In patients with breast tissue, the expression of the translation product of the specific gene combination is statistically compared to the patient with no expression of the translation product of the specific gene combination in the breast tissue, It is shown with statistical significance that the breast cancer relapses relatively early (for example, within 5 years). The specific gene combination is specifically at least two genes selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-MET, and in particular, a combination of AMAP1 and GEP100, or EBL5 and c-Met. Patients with translation product expression in a combination of combinations have a high risk of local recurrence with statistical significance. That is, as described below for a method for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, if the expression of the translation product of the above gene combination is observed at a certain level in breast tissue, the patient has breast cancer after breast cancer-preserving therapy Predicted high risk of local recurrence early. Thus, in the present invention, “prediction of local recurrence risk after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy” is based on the premise that the expression of the translation product of the specific gene combination in breast tissue is detected. The diagnostic agent of the present invention to be used is specifically a reagent for use in detection of these gene translation products, and any one selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-Met It contains a protein and / or polypeptide that can specifically recognize a translation product of a gene.

遺伝子AMAP1(GeneID:50807)は、癌浸潤におけるArf6の下流エフェクターである。
遺伝子GEP100(GeneID:9922)は、癌浸潤におけるArf6活性化因子である。
遺伝子EPB41L5(略称EBL5)(GeneID:57669)は、癌浸潤におけるAMAP1の結合パートナーであり、浸潤仮足形成に必須である。
遺伝子c−Met(GeneID:4233)は、癌浸潤においてTGFβ1によってトランス活性化され、GEP100を活性化する細胞表面受容体である。自身のリガンドである、HGFによっても直接活性化され、浸潤を促す。
The gene AMAP1 (GeneID: 50807) is a downstream effector of Arf6 in cancer invasion.
Gene GEP100 (GeneID: 9922) is an Arf6 activator in cancer invasion.
The gene EPB41L5 (abbreviation EBL5) (GeneID: 57669) is a binding partner of AMAP1 in cancer invasion and is essential for invasion pseudopod formation.
The gene c-Met (GeneID: 4233) is a cell surface receptor that is transactivated by TGFβ1 in cancer invasion and activates GEP100. It is also directly activated by its own ligand, HGF, and promotes invasion.

上記遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドとは、上記遺伝子のうち一の遺伝子の翻訳産物に特異的に結合し得るものであれば特に限定されるものでは無いが、例えば、当該翻訳産物に対する抗体及び/又はその断片が挙げられる。抗体及び/又はその断片としては、ポリクローナル抗体、モノクローナル抗体、一本鎖抗体、ヒト化抗体等が挙げられるが、これらに限定されるものではない。上記遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質及びポリペプチドの調製方法については、遺伝子翻訳産物に対する特異的結合を保持し得る限り、どのような方法も採用し得るが、当該遺伝子翻訳産物となるタンパク質及び/又はその断片を抗原として、公知の手法により所望のポリクローナル抗体、モノクローナル抗体、一本鎖抗体、ヒト化抗体等を調製することが出来る。   The protein and / or polypeptide capable of specifically recognizing the translation product of the gene is not particularly limited as long as it can specifically bind to the translation product of one of the genes. For example, an antibody against the translation product and / or a fragment thereof can be mentioned. Examples of antibodies and / or fragments thereof include, but are not limited to, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, single chain antibodies, humanized antibodies, and the like. Any method can be adopted as a method for preparing the protein and polypeptide capable of specifically recognizing the translation product of the gene as long as the specific binding to the gene translation product can be maintained. The desired polyclonal antibody, monoclonal antibody, single chain antibody, humanized antibody, etc. can be prepared by a known method using the protein and / or fragment thereof as an antigen.

さらに、本発明の診断薬においては、単一の診断薬に、上記遺伝子のうち1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質又はポリペプチド1つのみが含まれていてもよいし、或いは上記遺伝子の翻訳産物それぞれをそれぞれ特異的に認識可能な2以上のタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが含まれていてもよい。加えて、上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドは、遺伝子翻訳産物の検出のために、標識物質で標識されていてもよく、標識物質としては、蛍光物質(例えば、GFP等の蛍光タンパク質、並びにフルオロセイン等の蛍光低分子化合物を含む)等が挙げられる。但し、これら標識物質による標識を有する物に限定される意図ではない。本発明の診断薬において上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが標識されていない場合には、当該遺伝子の翻訳産物の最終的な検出には、それらタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチド(一次抗体)に結合する二次抗体を用いたシステムを用いることができる。このような二次抗体を用いたシステムには市販の検出キットがあり、例えば、一次抗体に対する二次抗体がペルオキシダーゼで標識されており、試料中で目的遺伝子翻訳産物に特異的に結合した一次抗体にさらに上記二次抗体を特異的に結合させ、ペルオキシダーゼの発色基質となる3,3'-ジアミノベンジジンテトラヒドロクロライドを当該試料に添加して発色を観察することにより遺伝子翻訳産物の検出することが出来る。さらに、本発明において、1つの診断薬に、上記遺伝子の翻訳産物それぞれをそれぞれ特異的に認識可能な2以上のタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが含まれていている場合には、例えば、それら2以上のタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドをそれぞれ異なる波長の蛍光を発する異種の蛍光物質で標識しておけば、同一試料において目的の遺伝子翻訳産物それぞれを検出することが出来る。   Furthermore, in the diagnostic agent of the present invention, the single diagnostic agent may contain only one protein or polypeptide that can specifically recognize the translation product of one of the above genes, Alternatively, two or more proteins and / or polypeptides capable of specifically recognizing each translation product of the gene may be included. In addition, the protein and / or polypeptide may be labeled with a labeling substance for the detection of gene translation products. Examples of the labeling substance include fluorescent substances (for example, fluorescent proteins such as GFP, and fluorescein). And the like). However, it is not intended to be limited to those having labels with these labeling substances. When the protein and / or polypeptide is not labeled in the diagnostic agent of the present invention, the final detection of the translation product of the gene involves the binding to the protein and / or polypeptide (primary antibody). A system using a secondary antibody can be used. Such a system using a secondary antibody includes a commercially available detection kit. For example, a secondary antibody against the primary antibody is labeled with peroxidase, and the primary antibody specifically bound to the target gene translation product in the sample. Furthermore, the above-mentioned secondary antibody can be specifically bound to 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as a color substrate for peroxidase added to the sample, and the color development can be observed to detect the gene translation product. . Furthermore, in the present invention, when one diagnostic agent contains two or more proteins and / or polypeptides capable of specifically recognizing each of the translation products of the above genes, for example, two or more of them may be used. Each of the target gene translation products can be detected in the same sample by labeling these proteins and / or polypeptides with different fluorescent substances that emit fluorescence of different wavelengths.

診断薬は、任意に、緩衝剤、防腐剤、凍結防止剤等を含み得る。緩衝剤としては、例えば、トリス塩酸塩、リン酸カリウム、リン酸ナトリウム等を挙げることかできる。防腐剤としては、例えば、アジ化ナトリウム等を挙げることができる。凍結防止剤としては、例えば、グリセロール等を挙げることができる。   Diagnostic agents can optionally include buffers, preservatives, cryoprotectants, and the like. Examples of the buffer include tris hydrochloride, potassium phosphate, sodium phosphate and the like. Examples of the preservative include sodium azide. Examples of the antifreezing agent include glycerol.

本発明の診断薬は、後述する乳癌温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法の工程(A)において、所定の遺伝子翻訳産物の発現レベルを決定するために当該遺伝子の翻訳産物を検出するのに用いることができる。   The diagnostic agent of the present invention detects the translation product of a predetermined gene translation product in order to determine the expression level of the gene translation product in step (A) of the method for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer preservation therapy described later. Can be used.

キット
本発明の別の態様によれば、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いるためのキットであって、上述の診断薬を含む、キットが提供される。
Kit According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a kit for use in predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, comprising the above-described diagnostic agent.

本発明のキットは、以下の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法を実施する上で用いられ得る試薬及び部材等の要素をキットとして提供するものであり、上記診断薬を含むことを特徴とする。   The kit of the present invention provides components such as reagents and members that can be used in carrying out the following method for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, and includes the above-mentioned diagnostic agent It is characterized by.

本発明のキットにおいては、本発明の診断薬が、(1)単一の診断薬において、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−METのうち1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質又はポリペプチド1つのみが含まれることにより1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物の検出が可能である診断薬であってもよいし、(2)単一の診断薬においてそれら遺伝子の翻訳産物それぞれをそれぞれ特異的に認識可能な2以上のタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが含まれることにより当該単一の診断薬が上記複数の遺伝子翻訳産物の検出が可能である単一の診断薬であってもよい。さらに、本発明のキットにおいては、上記(1)の1つの遺伝子の翻訳産物の検出が可能である診断薬、及び/又は上記(2)の複数の遺伝子翻訳産物の検出が可能である単一の診断薬が含まれ得る。さらに本発明のキットに含まれる診断薬が一種類であろうと二種類であろうと、当該キットに含まれる診断薬により複数の遺伝子翻訳産物の検出を可能とする場合には、以下の(i)〜(ii)のいずれかの組合せの遺伝子の翻訳産物を検出できる診断薬であることが好ましい。   In the kit of the present invention, the diagnostic agent of the present invention is (1) a protein capable of specifically recognizing the translation product of one gene of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-MET in a single diagnostic agent. Alternatively, it may be a diagnostic agent capable of detecting the translation product of one gene by including only one polypeptide, or (2) each of the translation products of each gene is specific in a single diagnostic agent. The single diagnostic agent may be a single diagnostic agent capable of detecting the plurality of gene translation products by including two or more recognizable proteins and / or polypeptides. Furthermore, in the kit of the present invention, a diagnostic agent capable of detecting the translation product of one gene of (1) above and / or a single agent capable of detecting a plurality of gene translation products of (2) above. Diagnostic agents may be included. Further, when the diagnostic agent contained in the kit enables detection of a plurality of gene translation products, whether the diagnostic agent contained in the kit of the present invention is one type or two types, the following (i) It is preferable that it is a diagnostic agent which can detect the translation product of the gene of any combination of-(ii).

(i)AMAP1及びGEP100、並びに
(ii)EBL5及びc−Met。
(I) AMAP1 and GEP100, and (ii) EBL5 and c-Met.

本発明のキットには、上記診断薬に加えて、ブロッキング試薬、診断薬に含まれるタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチド(抗体)の検出に用いるための標識化二次抗体、発色試薬、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法に関する実験プロトコルを記述した指示書等が任意に含まれ得る。ブロッキング試薬としては、例えば、牛血清アルブミン(BSA)等を挙げることができる。   In addition to the above diagnostic agents, the kit of the present invention includes a blocking reagent, a labeled secondary antibody for use in detecting a protein and / or polypeptide (antibody) contained in the diagnostic agent, a coloring reagent, breast cancer breast-preserving therapy Instructions describing the experimental protocol regarding how to predict the risk of subsequent local recurrence may optionally be included. Examples of the blocking reagent include bovine serum albumin (BSA).

予測方法
本発明の別の態様によれば、以下の乳癌温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法が提供される。
(A)乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた患者から採取した生体試料において、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−Metから成る群から選択される少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定すること;並びに
(B)工程(A)において決定した翻訳産物発現レベルに基づいて、上記患者の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測すること、
を含む、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法。
Prediction Method According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for predicting the risk of local recurrence after the following breast cancer-preserving therapy.
(A) determining a translation product expression level of at least two genes selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-Met, respectively, in a biological sample collected from a patient who has received breast cancer breast-conserving therapy; And (B) predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy in the patient based on the translation product expression level determined in step (A),
Predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer.

本発明の方法において、「乳癌乳房温存療法」の定義は、上記した通りである。本発明の方法において、患者とは、上記の乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた患者である。   In the method of the present invention, the definition of “breast cancer breast-conserving therapy” is as described above. In the method of the present invention, the patient is a patient who has received the breast cancer breast-conserving therapy described above.

本発明の方法において、「生体試料」とは、上記乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた患者から採取された任意の生体試料である。生体試料は、乳房組織であることが好ましく、さらに、乳房組織としては、乳癌乳房温存療法の腫瘍摘出術の際に患者から摘出した乳癌病変部位の組織であってもよいし、病変部位が存在していた近傍の乳房組織であって腫瘍摘出術の後に採取した乳房組織もよい。但し、患者への負担を極力軽減し、かつ局所再発リスクの精度良い予測を達成する観点から、乳房組織は、乳癌乳房温存療法の腫瘍摘出術の際に患者から摘出した乳癌病変部位の組織であることが好ましい。   In the method of the present invention, the “biological sample” is any biological sample collected from a patient who has received the breast cancer breast preservation therapy. The biological sample is preferably breast tissue, and the breast tissue may be a tissue of a breast cancer lesion site removed from a patient at the time of tumor removal for breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, or a lesion site is present. It may be a nearby breast tissue that has been removed and taken after tumor removal. However, from the viewpoint of reducing the burden on the patient as much as possible and achieving an accurate prediction of the risk of local recurrence, the breast tissue is the tissue of the breast lesion site removed from the patient at the time of tumor removal for breast cancer breast preservation therapy. Preferably there is.

本発明の方法の工程(A)においては、上記生体試料において、AMAP1、GEP100、EBL5、及びc−Metから成る群から選択される少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定する。これら遺伝子は、Arf6経路に属する遺伝子である。以下の実施例で示される結果によれば、乳癌患者の乳房組織においてArf6経路に属する遺伝子が組織レベルで発現し、Arf6経路の稼働が推定される場合には、当該患者は相対的に乳癌乳房温存療法後に早期に局所再発するリスクが高いことが裏付けられている。従って、Arf6経路に属する遺伝子のうちの少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物の発現レベルを決定し、それら二つの遺伝子の発現が確認された場合、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発を促進するものと考えられるArf経路の稼働が推定され、当該患者は早期に乳癌を局所再発する蓋然性が高いと判断し得ることから、本願発明の方法の工程(A)では、Arf経路に属する遺伝子から成る群から選択される少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定する。   In step (A) of the method of the present invention, translation product expression levels of at least two genes selected from the group consisting of AMAP1, GEP100, EBL5, and c-Met are determined in the biological sample. These genes are genes belonging to the Arf6 pathway. According to the results shown in the following examples, when a gene belonging to the Arf6 pathway is expressed at the tissue level in breast tissue of a breast cancer patient and the operation of the Arf6 pathway is estimated, the patient is relatively breast cancer breast. This confirms the high risk of local recurrence early after conservative therapy. Therefore, when the expression levels of the translation products of at least two of the genes belonging to the Arf6 pathway are determined and the expression of these two genes is confirmed, it is considered that local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy is promoted. Therefore, in the step (A) of the method of the present invention, the patient is selected from the group consisting of genes belonging to the Arf pathway. The translation product expression levels of at least two genes to be determined are respectively determined.

なお、GEP100、Arf6、及びAMAP1等の遺伝子群を含むArf6経路が、乳癌の浸潤及び転移を促進するのに重要な役割を果たすことが報告されており、このArf6経路に属する遺伝子のうち、GEP100及びEGFR、或いはArf6及びAMAP1の組合せが共発現している場合、乳癌の悪性度及び浸潤度が高いことが示されている(Morishige M, Hashimoto S, Ogawa E, et al: GEP100 links epidermal growth factor receptor signalling to Arf6 activation to induce breast cancer invasion. Nat Cell Biol 10:85-92, 2008;Hashimoto S, Onodera Y, Hashimoto A, et al: Requirement for Arf6 in breast cancer invasive activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:6647-52, 2004;Onodera Y, Hashimoto S, Hashimoto A, et al: Expression of AMAP1, an ArfGAP, provides novel targets to inhibit breast cancer invasive activities. EMBO J 24:963-73, 2005)。加えて、Arf6経路に属する遺伝子の高レベル発現が、乳癌乳房温存療法後の再発に相関する可能性があることが考えられ(JMTO,Newsletter, 2012年9月、No.14,p3-4;福井大学医学部ライフサイエンスイノベーション推進機構セミナー兼第371回学内セミナー(大学院セミナー)要旨:p53 mutation and TGFβ signaling culminate in cancer invasiveness via GEP100-Arf6-AMAP1 pathway)、そのうち、GEP100及びEGFRの共発現が、乳癌乳房温存療法後の再発に相関するか否かが、まず検討された(R. Kinoshitaら、International Journal of Radiation Oncology・Biology・Physics, Volume 84, Number 3S, Supplement 2012 Poster Viewing Abstracts, S227, 2026:Co-overexpression of GEP100 with EGFR correlates with early recurrence after breast conservation therapy (BCT))。その結果、その後の詳細な検討も含め、GEP100及びEGFRの組合せ共発現では乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発を有意に予測できない事がわかり、かつArf6経路に属するその他遺伝子が乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発に有意に相関することもこれ迄には明らかにされていない。   It has been reported that the Arf6 pathway including genes such as GEP100, Arf6, and AMAP1 plays an important role in promoting breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Among the genes belonging to the Arf6 pathway, GEP100 And EGFR, or the combination of Arf6 and AMAP1 have been shown to have high malignancy and invasion of breast cancer (Morishige M, Hashimoto S, Ogawa E, et al: GEP100 links epidermal growth factor receptor signaling to Arf6 activation to induce breast cancer invasion. Nat Cell Biol 10: 85-92, 2008; Hashimoto S, Onodera Y, Hashimoto A, et al: Requirement for Arf6 in breast cancer invasive activities.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6647-52, 2004; Onodera Y, Hashimoto S, Hashimoto A, et al: Expression of AMAP1, an ArfGAP, provides novel targets to inhibit breast cancer invasive activities. EMBO J 24: 963-73, 2005). In addition, it is possible that high-level expression of genes belonging to the Arf6 pathway may be correlated with recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy (JMTO, Newsletter, September 2012, No. 14, p3-4; Fukui University School of Medicine Life Science Innovation Promotion Organization Seminar and 371st Seminar (Graduate Seminar) Summary: p53 mutation and TGFβ signaling culminate in cancer invasiveness via GEP100-Arf6-AMAP1 pathway), of which GEP100 and EGFR co-expression It was first examined whether it correlated with recurrence after breast-conserving therapy (R. Kinoshita et al., International Journal of Radiation Oncology / Biology / Physics, Volume 84, Number 3S, Supplement 2012 Poster Viewing Abstracts, S227, 2026: Co-overexpression of GEP100 with EGFR correlates with early recurrence after breast conservation therapy (BCT)). As a result, it was found that local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy cannot be significantly predicted by the combined co-expression of GEP100 and EGFR, including detailed investigations thereafter, and other genes belonging to the Arf6 pathway are not To date, no significant correlation with local recurrence has been shown.

本発明方法の工程(A)において、生体試料における上記所定の遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルを決定する方法としては、特に限定されるものでは無いが、具体的には、本発明の診断薬について上記した如く、検出の対象となる遺伝子の翻訳産物を特異的に認識可能なタンパク質又はポリペプチド(診断薬)を用いて当該遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルを決定することが可能である。より具体的には、生体試料である組織切片において遺伝子翻訳産物の発現強度及び発現分布を正確に把握して発現レベルを決定出来ることから、特に、それらタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチド(診断薬)を用いた免疫組織化学法により当該遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルを決定することが好ましい。なお、免疫組織化学法については、各種公知の手法が知られている。本発明においては、それら公知の手法を用いても良いし、或いは新たに開発された手法を用いてもよく、対象となる遺伝子翻訳産物の発現レベルを決定できるものである限り、特に限定されるものではない。   In the step (A) of the method of the present invention, the method for determining the translation product expression level of the predetermined gene in the biological sample is not particularly limited, but specifically, the diagnostic agent of the present invention is described above. As described above, it is possible to determine the translation product expression level of the gene using a protein or polypeptide (diagnostic agent) that can specifically recognize the translation product of the gene to be detected. More specifically, since the expression level can be determined by accurately grasping the expression intensity and expression distribution of the gene translation product in a tissue section which is a biological sample, in particular, the protein and / or polypeptide (diagnostic agent) It is preferable to determine the expression level of the translation product of the gene by the immunohistochemical method used. Various known methods are known for immunohistochemical methods. In the present invention, those known methods may be used, or a newly developed method may be used, and the method is particularly limited as long as the expression level of the target gene translation product can be determined. It is not a thing.

さらに、本発明においては、遺伝子翻訳産物の特異的な検出を確保するために、上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドは、検出の対象となる遺伝子翻訳産物に対する抗体及び/又はその断片であることが好ましい。   Furthermore, in the present invention, in order to ensure specific detection of a gene translation product, the protein and / or polypeptide is preferably an antibody against a gene translation product to be detected and / or a fragment thereof. .

さらに、本発明方法の工程(A)において、本発明所定の少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定するには、具体的には、生体試料において任意のタンパク質検出法で検出されたシグナル強度を一定の基準と比較することにより、本発明所定の遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルを決定することが出来る。一定の基準の例としては、同一患者から採取した非癌性組織(特に、非癌性乳房組織)における本発明所定の遺伝子翻訳産物発現レベルを対照とする形態が挙げられる。この場合、具体的には、同一患者から採取した非癌性組織(特に、非癌性乳房組織)における本発明所定の遺伝子翻訳産物発現について同一のタンパク質検出法で検出されたシグナル強度と、対象生体試料における本発明所定の遺伝子翻訳産物のシグナル強度を比較し、本発明所定の少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定することができる。さらに、「翻訳産物発現レベルを決定する」との具体的な形態としては、例えば、上記一定の基準又は対照と比較して対象生体試料における本発明所定の少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現のシグナル強度が「高い」、「同等」又は「低い」と判定することができる。或いは、例えば上記一定の基準又は対照におけるシグナル強度を基準として対象生体試料における本発明所定の少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現のシグナル強度をスコア化することが挙げられる。シグナル強度をスコア化については、例えば、対照試料における遺伝子翻訳産物のシグナル強度を0とし、そのシグナル強度と対照生体試料における遺伝子翻訳産物のシグナル強度を比較して、例えば、−1から3等の整数でスコア化することが出来る。   Furthermore, in the step (A) of the method of the present invention, in order to determine the expression level of translation products of at least two genes specified in the present invention, specifically, signals detected by an arbitrary protein detection method in a biological sample By comparing the intensity with a certain standard, the translation product expression level of a predetermined gene of the present invention can be determined. As an example of a certain standard, there is a form in which the expression level of the gene translation product of the present invention in a non-cancerous tissue (particularly non-cancerous breast tissue) collected from the same patient is used as a control. In this case, specifically, the signal intensity detected by the same protein detection method for the expression of the gene translation product of the present invention in the non-cancerous tissue (particularly non-cancerous breast tissue) collected from the same patient, and the target By comparing the signal intensities of the gene translation products of the present invention in biological samples, the expression levels of translation products of at least two genes of the present invention can be determined respectively. Furthermore, as a specific form of “determining the translation product expression level”, for example, a signal of translation product expression of at least two genes of the present invention in a subject biological sample as compared with the above-mentioned certain standard or control It can be determined that the intensity is “high”, “equivalent”, or “low”. Alternatively, for example, the signal intensity of the translation product expression of at least two genes of the present invention in the target biological sample in the target biological sample can be scored on the basis of the signal intensity in the certain standard or control. For scoring the signal intensity, for example, the signal intensity of the gene translation product in the control sample is set to 0, and the signal intensity is compared with the signal intensity of the gene translation product in the control biological sample. Can be scored with an integer.

本発明方法の工程(B)においては、工程(A)において決定した翻訳産物発現レベルに基づいて、上記患者の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する。   In step (B) of the method of the present invention, the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy for the patient is predicted based on the translation product expression level determined in step (A).

工程(B)において乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測するには、具体的には、工程(A)に関し上記に説明した通り、上記一定の基準又は対照と比較により取得した「高い」、「同等」又は「低い」、或いはシグナル強度をスコア化した値に基づいて、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測することが出来る。より具体的には、対象生体試料における上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルが「高い」と判断された場合には、当該患者は乳癌の局所再発リスクが高いと判断し、対象生体試料における上記少なくとも2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルが「同等」又は「低い」と判断された場合には、当該患者は乳癌の局所再発リスクが低いと判断することが出来る。或いは、上記の通り遺伝子翻訳産物発現レベルをスコア化した形態を採用した場合には、予めスコアに局所再発リスクが「高い」、「低い」又は「中程度」等の判定基準を割り振っておき、上スコア化により得られた対象生体試料についてのスコアに基づいて乳癌の局所再発リスクを「高い」、「低い」又は「中程度」等と判定してもよい。さらに加えて、乳癌の局所再発リスクの予測は、「高い」、「低い」又は「中程度」のような結果を得るだけでなく、乳癌乳房温存療法後から乳癌を発症するリスクが50〜90%(例えば、50%、60%、70%、80%、90%、95%等)である期間がどの程度であるかを判定することも含み得る。   In order to predict the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy in step (B), specifically, as described above with respect to step (A), the “high” obtained by comparison with the certain criteria or controls. Based on the “equivalent” or “low” or signal intensity scored value, the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy can be predicted. More specifically, when it is determined that the expression level of the translation product of the at least two genes in the target biological sample is “high”, the patient is determined to have a high risk of local recurrence of breast cancer. When the expression level of translation products of the at least two genes is determined to be “equivalent” or “low”, the patient can be determined to have a low risk of local recurrence of breast cancer. Alternatively, when adopting a form in which the gene translation product expression level is scored as described above, a criterion such as “high”, “low” or “medium” is assigned to the risk of local recurrence in advance, The local recurrence risk of breast cancer may be determined as “high”, “low”, “medium”, or the like based on the score of the target biological sample obtained by the above scoring. In addition, the prediction of breast cancer local recurrence risk not only yields results such as “high”, “low” or “moderate”, but also the risk of developing breast cancer after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy is 50-90. It may also include determining how long a period that is% (eg, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, etc.).

治療又は予防方法
さらに、本発明の別の態様によれば、乳癌の再発を治療又は予防する方法が提供される。具体的には、乳癌の局所再発を治療又は予防する方法とは、上記乳癌温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法により得られた予測結果に基づいて、乳癌の再発を治療又は予防する方法である。
Treatment or Prevention Methods Further, according to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treating or preventing breast cancer recurrence. Specifically, a method for treating or preventing local recurrence of breast cancer is a method for treating or preventing breast cancer recurrence based on a prediction result obtained by the method for predicting local recurrence risk after breast cancer-preserving therapy. It is.

具体的には、本方法は、抗癌剤を用いた化学療法、ホルモン療法、放射線療法、外科的処置、食事療法、生活指導等、任意の乳癌の再発を治療又は予防し得る手段を含む。   Specifically, this method includes means capable of treating or preventing any recurrence of breast cancer, such as chemotherapy using anticancer agents, hormonal therapy, radiation therapy, surgical treatment, diet therapy, lifestyle guidance, and the like.

本方法は、上記乳癌温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測する方法により得られた予測結果に基づいて、乳癌の再発を治療又は予防する限り特に限定されるものではなく、上記乳癌温存療法後の再発リスクを予測する方法の方法工程を含んでもよいし、含まなくてもよい。   This method is not particularly limited as long as it treats or prevents the recurrence of breast cancer based on the prediction result obtained by the method for predicting the risk of local recurrence after the breast cancer preservation therapy. The method steps for predicting the risk of recurrence may or may not be included.

以下の実施例により本発明をさらに具体的に説明するが、本発明は以下の実施例により特に限定されるものではない。   The present invention will be described more specifically with reference to the following examples, but the present invention is not particularly limited by the following examples.

<材料及び方法>
(材料及び方法)
(1)患者集団
1988年から2008年にかけて、北海道大学病院(日本国、北海道)において乳房温存手術を受け、その後、乳房全体への放射線照射治療を受けた479人の乳がん患者に関し、彼らの483の乳房について過去を遡って分析した。2010年の5月までに、追跡期間中央値54か月で、20人の患者において総計20の再発が観察された。これら20人の患者のうち、19人の病理組織標本が解析に利用可能であった。ただ一人が、不全の最初の部位として乳房に再発を生じた。残りの一人において、放射線療法の完了後、最初の4か月で局所リンパ節に再発が生じ、かつ18か月において乳房に再発が生じた。乳房における再発時期を19人の患者における解析に用いた。
なお、本試験は、北海道大学の治験審査委員会によって承認されたものである。
<Materials and methods>
(Materials and methods)
(1) Patient population From 1988 to 2008, 479 breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery at Hokkaido University Hospital (Hokkaido, Japan) and subsequently received radiation therapy to the entire breast. The breasts were analyzed retrospectively. By May 2010, a total of 20 recurrences were observed in 20 patients with a median follow-up of 54 months. Of these 20 patients, 19 histopathology specimens were available for analysis. Only one had a recurrence in the breast as the first site of failure. In the remaining one, local lymph nodes recurred in the first 4 months after completion of radiation therapy, and breasts recurred in 18 months. The time of recurrence in the breast was used for analysis in 19 patients.
This study was approved by the Hokkaido University Clinical Trial Review Board.

(2)治療方法
8人の患者は、腫瘤摘出術を受け、8人の患者は乳房4/1切除術を受けた。19人の患者のうち16人(84%)は、腋窩リンパ節郭清を受けており、その他3人(16%)は、センチネルリンパ節生検を受けていた。TNM分類(UICC第5版)がcT3N1M0である患者1人は、トランツズマブ(trastuzumab)投与を含む術前化学療法を受けており、さらに手術後に、補助療法としてトランツズマブ投与を受けていた。1人の患者は、手術の間に化学療法を受けていた。1人の患者は、手術の間、及び手術の後に化学療法を受けていた。3人の患者は、放射線療法の後に化学療法を受けていた。5人の患者は放射線療法の後にホルモン療法を受けていた。全ての患者が、罹患側の乳房に全乳房接線照射を受けていた。1人の患者は、胸骨傍リンパ節及び鎖骨上リンパ節の部位に照射を受けていた。顕微鏡検査により完全な切除を受けた患者に対する処方線量は、18回の照射において45Gyであり、顕微鏡検査により不完全な切除となった患者[切除断端陽性又は切除断端近接(close margin) (5mm未満)]の処方線量は、20回の照射において50Gyであった。2005年7月以来、50歳未満の患者は、切除断端の状態に関わらず、20回の照射において50Gyの照射を受けていた。
(2) Treatment method Eight patients underwent massectomy, and eight patients underwent breast 4/1 resection. Of the 19 patients, 16 (84%) had axillary lymph node dissection and the other 3 (16%) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy. One patient with a TNM classification (UICC 5th edition) of cT3N1M0 had received preoperative chemotherapy including trastuzumab and was also given trastuzumab as an adjuvant therapy after surgery. One patient was receiving chemotherapy during surgery. One patient was receiving chemotherapy during and after surgery. Three patients received chemotherapy after radiation therapy. Five patients received hormone therapy after radiation therapy. All patients had full breast tangent irradiation on the affected breast. One patient had been irradiated at the sites of parasternal and supraclavicular lymph nodes. The prescription dose for patients who have undergone complete resection by microscopic examination is 45 Gy after 18 irradiations, and patients who have undergone incomplete resection by microscopic examination [positive margin or close margin (close margin) ( The prescription dose of less than 5 mm) was 50 Gy after 20 irradiations. Since July 2005, patients under the age of 50 have received 50 Gy of irradiation in 20 doses, regardless of the condition of the resected stump.

(3)組織標本
19の病理標本は全て、広範な切除により得た外科的標本であった。1人の患者が、手術前に術前補助化学療法を受けていた。切除断端の病理学的特徴及び無腫瘍状態について、盲検下において、本試験における疾患パラメータを把握していない病理学者が調査した。
(3) Tissue specimens All 19 pathological specimens were surgical specimens obtained by extensive excision. One patient had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. The pathological features and tumor-free state of the resected stump were examined blindly by a pathologist who did not grasp the disease parameters in this study.

以下の通り切除断端の状態を定義し、病理学者による評価を行った。
(i)切除の染色縁(inked edge)に腫瘍[浸潤性乳管癌(invasive ductal carcinoma; IDC)又は非浸潤性乳管癌(ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS)]が認められる場合は切除断端陽性;
(ii)切除断端から5mm以下に腫瘍(IDC又はDCIS)が認められる断端近接(close margin);並びに
(iii)切除断端から5mm超で無腫瘍である断端は断端陰性。
The state of the resected stump was defined as follows and evaluated by a pathologist.
(I) Resection stump if tumor [invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)] is observed at the inked edge of resection Positive;
(Ii) Close margin where tumor (IDC or DCIS) is observed 5 mm or less from the resected margin; and (iii) Stumps that are more than 5 mm from the resected margin and are tumor-free are negative.

(4)免疫組織化学(Immunohistochemistry;IHC)
AMAP1及びGEP100に対する抗体は過去に報告されたものであった(Onodera et al., 2006; Morishige et al., 2008)。EPB41L5抗体は、はそのヒト蛋白質のアミノ酸558番目から733番目までを含むペプチドを抗原としウサギに免疫した後、標準的手法によって抗血清を採取、抗原にてアフィニティ精製したものを用いた。c−METに対する抗体はAbcam、EGFR抗体はNichirei、HER2に対する抗体はDAKOから、それぞれ購入した。
(4) Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Antibodies against AMAP1 and GEP100 have been reported previously (Onodera et al., 2006; Morishige et al., 2008). The EPB41L5 antibody was obtained by immunizing rabbits with a peptide containing amino acids 558 to 733 of the human protein as an antigen, collecting antisera by standard techniques, and affinity-purifying with the antigen. The antibody against c-MET was purchased from Abcam, the EGFR antibody from Nichirei, and the antibody against HER2 from DAKO.

免疫組織化学染色は、以下の通り、厚さ4μmのホルマリン固定パラフィン包埋連続切片を用いて実施した。全てのスライドは、最初にキシレンにおいて脱パラフィン処理を行い、段階的なアルコールにおいて脱水処理を実施し、次いで、切片をトリス緩衝食塩水(TBS: 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl)でリンスした。   Immunohistochemical staining was performed using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded serial sections with a thickness of 4 μm as follows. All slides were first deparaffinized in xylene, dehydrated in graded alcohol, then sections were tris-buffered saline (TBS: 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 137 mM NaCl) , 2.7 mM KCl).

その後、以下の条件により、各抗原について切片の抗原賦活化処理を行った。
(i)HER2又はEPB41L5(EBL5):クエン酸緩衝液(pH6.0)で95℃、40分インキュベート;
(ii)EGFR:ペプシン溶液で37℃、10分インキュベート;
(iii)AMAP1又はGEP100:抗原賦活化液(EDTA solution、pH9、Nichireiから購入 )で95℃、40分インキュベート;
(iv)c−MET::抗原賦活化液(EDTA solution、pH9、Nichireiから購入)で95℃、40分インキュベート。
Then, the antigen activation process of the section | slice was performed about each antigen on the following conditions.
(I) HER2 or EPB41L5 (EBL5): incubation with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95 ° C. for 40 minutes;
(Ii) EGFR: Incubate with pepsin solution at 37 ° C. for 10 minutes;
(Iii) AMAP1 or GEP100: incubation with an antigen activation solution (EDTA solution, pH 9, purchased from Nichirei) at 95 ° C. for 40 minutes;
(Iv) Incubate at 95 ° C. for 40 minutes with c-MET :: antigen activation solution (EDTA solution, pH 9, purchased from Nichirei).

次いで、室温で0.3%H22/メタノールにインキュベートすることにより、内因性ペルオキシダーゼをブロックした。切片をTBSで洗浄した後、EGFR(1:50)、HER2(1:200)、AMAP1(1:500)、GEP100(1:100)、EPB41L5(EBL5;1:1000)、又はc−MET(1:50)に対する一次抗体(括弧内の比率は希釈倍率)と共に、室温で30分間、インキュベートした。さらにTBSで洗浄した後、二次抗体としてEnVision(商標) (DAKO、日本国)を用いて各一次抗体の検出を行い、ジアミノベンジジンを用いて発色させた。各切片は、ヘマトキシリンを用いて対比染色し、水洗した後、定常法に従い透徹処理・封入処理を行った。 The endogenous peroxidase was then blocked by incubation in 0.3% H 2 O 2 / methanol at room temperature. After washing the sections with TBS, EGFR (1:50), HER2 (1: 200), AMAP1 (1: 500), GEP100 (1: 100), EPB41L5 (EBL5; 1: 1000), or c-MET ( 1:50) with the primary antibody (the ratio in parentheses is the dilution factor) for 30 minutes at room temperature. After further washing with TBS, each primary antibody was detected using EnVision (trademark) (DAKO, Japan) as a secondary antibody, and color was developed using diaminobenzidine. Each section was counterstained with hematoxylin, washed with water, and then subjected to penetration treatment and encapsulation treatment according to a routine method.

(5)評価
全ての試料は、それぞれ独立に、盲検下で、二人の病理学者により評価した。
(5) Evaluation All samples were evaluated independently by two pathologists in a blinded manner.

EGFRについては、陽性度は、0〜2+のシグナル強度に基づき、同一患者における正常(非癌性)乳管をコントロールの1+とし、各試料について評価を行った。   For EGFR, the degree of positivity was evaluated for each sample based on a signal intensity of 0 to 2+, with a normal (non-cancerous) duct in the same patient as control 1+.

HER2については、各試料は、シグナル強度と、細胞膜の染色度合及びその細胞数の割合に基づいて評価した。強い膜染色が認められる腫瘍細胞が30%超の場合は3+とし、「弱い」から「中程度」の膜染色が認められる腫瘍細胞が10%〜30%の場合、又は強い膜染色が認められる腫瘍細胞が10%未満の場合は2+とし、僅かの膜染色が認められる腫瘍細胞が10%未満の場合は1+とし、膜染色が全く観察されないか、若しくは僅かな膜染色が10%未満の腫瘍細胞にしか観察されない場合には0とした。   For HER2, each sample was evaluated based on the signal intensity, the degree of staining of the cell membrane, and the ratio of the number of cells. When tumor cells with strong membrane staining are more than 30%, the value is 3+. When tumor cells with “weak” to “moderate” membrane staining are 10% to 30%, or strong membrane staining is observed 2+ if tumor cells are less than 10%, 1+ if less than 10% of tumor cells are observed with slight membrane staining, tumor with no membrane staining or less than 10% membrane staining When it was observed only in cells, it was set to 0.

AMAP1については、正常なバックグランドの染色を1+とし、細胞膜及び細胞質の両方に染色が認められた場合は2+と評価した。   For AMAP1, normal background staining was 1+, and when staining was observed in both cell membrane and cytoplasm, it was evaluated as 2+.

GEP100については、各試料は、シグナル強度に基づいて1+及び2+で評価した。正常腺細胞質の染色については1+と決定した。   For GEP100, each sample was evaluated at 1+ and 2+ based on signal intensity. The normal gland cytoplasmic staining was determined as 1+.

c−METについては、コントロールである正常(非癌性)乳管試料より、シグナル強度が低いものを0と評価し、正常乳管試料と同等のシグナル強度のものは1+とし、正常乳管試料よりもシグナル強度が高いものを2+と評価した。   For c-MET, a control (normal non-cancerous) duct sample with a lower signal intensity was evaluated as 0, and a signal intensity equivalent to that of a normal duct sample was 1+. Those having higher signal intensity were evaluated as 2+.

EPB41L5(EBL5)については、まず、細胞質に染色が認められないもの、即ちコントロールである正常乳管試料と同等の染色シグナル強度のものは0と評価し、正常乳管試料と比較して中程度に染色シグナル強度が高いものを1+と評価し、正常乳管試料と比較して染色シグナル強度が顕著に高いものを2+と評価した。   Regarding EPB41L5 (EBL5), first, those having no staining in the cytoplasm, that is, those having a staining signal intensity equivalent to that of a normal normal duct sample as a control, are evaluated as 0, and are moderate compared with normal duct samples Those having a high staining signal intensity were evaluated as 1+, and those having a significantly high staining signal intensity compared to normal breast duct samples were evaluated as 2+.

(6)統計分析
年齢及び切除断端の状態等、予測因子と考えられてきた因子が、放射線治療の完了から再発までの期間に有意な影響を与えるか否かを決定するために、カプラン・マイヤー曲線を求めた。段階的重回帰分析(InstituteSas IS: JMPR 10 Modeling and Multivariate Methods, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2012 pp. 139-160)を用いて、放射線治療の完了から再発までの期間の自然対数と発現が相関するマーカーを同定した。段階的重回帰分析の候補となった予測因子変数は、EGFR、HER2、AMAP1、GEP100、EPB4IL5(EBL5)、c−MET、及びそれらの交互作用項である。因子を入力又は残すのに用いたp値の閾値は0.05である。各サブグループ、選択したマーカーの組合せに応じて決定した。再発までの対数時間を、チューキー・クレイマー(Tukey-Kramer)HSD(honestly significant difference)検定を用いた分散分析により、サブグループ間で比較した。サブグループのイベントまでの時間に関しカプラン・マイヤー曲線を求めた。0.05未満のp値は、統計的に有意な相関があると判断した。これらの解析は、JMP(登録商標)(Version 10, SAS Institute Inc., NC.)を用いて実施した。
(6) Statistical analysis To determine whether factors that have been considered predictive factors, such as age and resection margin, have a significant impact on the period from completion of radiotherapy to recurrence, Kaplan A Meyer curve was determined. Using a stepwise multiple regression analysis (InstituteSas IS: JMPR 10 Modeling and Multivariate Methods, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2012 pp. 139-160), the natural logarithm and expression of the period from completion of radiation therapy to recurrence were Correlated markers were identified. Predictor variables that are candidates for stepwise multiple regression analysis are EGFR, HER2, AMAP1, GEP100, EPB4IL5 (EBL5), c-MET, and their interaction terms. The p-value threshold used to enter or leave the factor is 0.05. Each subgroup was determined according to the selected marker combination. Logarithmic time to recurrence was compared between subgroups by analysis of variance using the Tukey-Kramer HSD (honestly significant difference) test. A Kaplan-Meier curve was calculated for the time to the subgroup event. A p value less than 0.05 was judged to be statistically significant. These analyzes were performed using JMP (registered trademark) (Version 10, SAS Institute Inc., NC.).

<結果>
(1)患者の臨床的特徴及び病理学的特徴
患者の特徴及び治療方法については、以下の表1に示す。加えて、患者の病理学的特徴、並びに放射線治療完了の後再発までの期間を表2に示す。さらに、各マーカーについて、免疫組織化学スコアを表3に示す。
<Result>
(1) Clinical characteristics and pathological characteristics of patients The characteristics and treatment methods of patients are shown in Table 1 below. In addition, Table 2 shows the pathological characteristics of the patient, as well as the time period after completion of radiation therapy to recurrence. Furthermore, the immunohistochemical score for each marker is shown in Table 3.


病理腫瘍病期については、7人の患者がTisであり、9人の患者がT1であり、3人の患者がT2であった。7人のDCIS患者のうち一人が、手術前に化学療法を受けており、その患者の生検試料は、臨床腫瘍病期がT3である浸潤性乳管癌と診断されていた。15人の患者がリンパ節転移陰性であり、4人の患者がリンパ節転移陽性であった。12人の患者が、切除縁陰性と診断されたのに対し、3人の患者が切除断端近接と診断され、かつ4人の患者が切除断端陽性であった。これら19人の患者について、放射線治療完了後局所再発までの中位期間は38月(8〜179月の範囲に分布)であった。   For pathological tumor stage, 7 patients were Tis, 9 patients were T1, and 3 patients were T2. One of the seven DCIS patients had received chemotherapy prior to surgery and his biopsy sample had been diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma with a clinical tumor stage of T3. 15 patients were negative for lymph node metastasis and 4 patients were positive for lymph node metastasis. Twelve patients were diagnosed with negative margins, while three patients were diagnosed with proximal margins and four were positive margins. For these 19 patients, the median period from completion of radiation therapy to local recurrence was 38 months (distributed in the range of 8-179 months).

(2)臨床因子及び局所再発までの期間
先ず、切除断端の状態、年齢、ER陽性、又はPgR陽性が、BCT後の局所再発のまでの期間に相関関係があるか否かについて調査した。その結果、切除断端陰性であった患者は、BCT後、局所再発無しの生存期間に関し40月の中央値を示した(図5A)。これに対して、切除端近接又は切除端陽性であった患者は38月の中央値を示した(図5A)。同様に、50歳未満の患者は35月の中央値を示したのに対し、50歳以上の患者も35月の中央値を示した(図5B)。ER陽性の患者は、35月の中央値を示したのに対し、ER陰性の患者は31.5月の中央値を示した(図5C)。PgR陽性の患者は35月の中央値を示したのに対し、PgR陰性の患者は20.5月の中央値を示した(図5D)。対数順位検定によって求められた通り、切除断端状態(p=0.48)、年齢(p=0.97)、ER状態(p=0.58)、並びにPgR状態(p=0.32)に関し、BCT後局所再発の中位期間において統計学的な差異は無かった。
(2) Clinical factor and period until local recurrence First, it was investigated whether the state of the resected stump, age, ER positivity, or PgR positivity was correlated with the period until local recurrence after BCT. As a result, patients with negative margins showed a median of 40 months for survival without local recurrence after BCT (FIG. 5A). In contrast, patients who were near or positive at the resection end showed a median value of 38 months (FIG. 5A). Similarly, patients younger than 50 years showed a median of 35 months, while patients over 50 years of age also showed a median of 35 months (FIG. 5B). ER positive patients showed a median of 35 months, whereas ER negative patients showed a median of 31.5 months (FIG. 5C). PgR positive patients showed a median of 35 months, whereas PgR negative patients showed a median of 20.5 months (FIG. 5D). As determined by the log rank test, the resected stump (p = 0.48), age (p = 0.97), ER (p = 0.58), and PgR (p = 0.32) There was no statistical difference in the median period of local recurrence after BCT.

(3)GEP100−Arf6−AMAP1経路における遺伝子翻訳産物の発現
GEP100とAMAP1の高レベルな共発現は、局所再発に相関することが判明した。GEP100−Arf6−AMAP1経路は、上述したEGFR及びHer2等、幾つかの受容体型チロシンキナーゼ(receptor tyrosine kinase)で活性化され得る。そこで、AMP1及びGEP100、さらにEGFR及びHer2のタンパク質発現について解析した。
(3) Expression of gene translation product in GEP100-Arf6-AMAP1 pathway It was found that high level co-expression of GEP100 and AMAP1 correlates with local recurrence. The GEP100-Arf6-AMAP1 pathway can be activated by several receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR and Her2 described above. Therefore, protein expression of AMP1 and GEP100, and EGFR and Her2 was analyzed.

EGFRについては、5つの事例(27.7%)でスコア1+の発現が認められ、13の事例(72.2%)が陰性(スコア0)であり、1つの事例が当てはまらなかった。HER2については、5つの事例(26.3%)、8つの事例(42.1%)、4つの事例(21.0%)、及び2つの事例(10.5%)が、それぞれ3+、2+、1+、及び0とスコア付けされた。AMAP1については、5つの事例(26.3%)が2+とスコア付けされ、14の事例(73.7%)が1+とスコア付けされた。GEP100については、8つの事例(42.1%)が2+とスコア付され、11の事例(57.9%)が1+とスコア付けされた。c−Metについては、7つの事例(36.8%)が2+とスコア付けされ、6つの事例(31.6%)が1+とスコア付けされ、6つの事例(31.6%)が0とスコア付された。EPB41L5(EBL5)については、2つの事例(10.5%)が3+とスコア付けされ、4つの事例(21.1%)が2+とスコア付けされ、5つの事例(26.3%)が1+とスコア付され、8つの事例(42.1%)が0とスコア付された。(表3)。さらに、免疫組織化学染色の顕微鏡写真の例を図1及び図2に示す。   For EGFR, expression of score 1+ was observed in 5 cases (27.7%), 13 cases (72.2%) were negative (score 0), and one case was not applicable. For HER2, 5 cases (26.3%), 8 cases (42.1%), 4 cases (21.0%), and 2 cases (10.5%) were 3+, 2+, respectively. Scored as 1+ and 0. For AMAP1, 5 cases (26.3%) were scored as 2+ and 14 cases (73.7%) were scored as 1+. For GEP100, 8 cases (42.1%) were scored as 2+ and 11 cases (57.9%) were scored as 1+. For c-Met, 7 cases (36.8%) are scored 2+, 6 cases (31.6%) are scored 1+, and 6 cases (31.6%) are 0. Scored. For EPB41L5 (EBL5), 2 cases (10.5%) are scored as 3+, 4 cases (21.1%) are scored as 2+, and 5 cases (26.3%) are 1+ And 8 cases (42.1%) were scored as 0. (Table 3). Furthermore, examples of photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining are shown in FIGS.

段階的重回帰分析法(InstituteSas IS: JMP(登録商標)10 Modeling and Multivariate Methods, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2012 pp. 139-160)を利用した解析により、GEP100及びAMAP1の組合せで遺伝子翻訳産物が高レベルに共発現しているケースでは、BCTの完了から局所再発までの期間の短さと有意な相関を有し(P<0.001)、さらにその交互作用効果もまた同期間の短さと有意な相関を有することが見出された(P=0.0018)。   Gene translation in combination with GEP100 and AMAP1 by analysis using stepwise multiple regression analysis (InstituteSas IS: JMP (registered trademark) 10 Modeling and Multivariate Methods, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2012 pp. 139-160) In cases where the product is co-expressed at a high level, there is a significant correlation with the short period from completion of BCT to local recurrence (P <0.001), and the interaction effect is also short in the same period. (P = 0.018).

BCTの完了後、時間の経過に伴いどれだけの患者が再発を免れているかを示す、カプラン・マイヤー曲線による解析の結果を図3及び図4に示す。図3において、"Homo"はAMAP1及びGEP100が共発現していたケースを示し、"Wild/Hetero"はAMAP1又はGEP100の何れか一方のみが発現していたケース、 並びにそれら遺伝子の何れも発現していなかったケースを示す。図4において、Homo"はc−MET及びEBL5が共発現していたケースを示し、"Wild/Hetero"はc−MET又はEBL5の何れか一方のみが発現していたケース、 並びにそれら遺伝子の何れも発現していなかったケースを示す。   FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 show the results of Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showing how many patients escape from recurrence over time after completion of BCT. In FIG. 3, “Homo” indicates a case where AMAP1 and GEP100 are co-expressed, “Wild / Hetero” indicates a case where only one of AMAP1 or GEP100 is expressed, and both of these genes are expressed. Indicates a case that was not. In FIG. 4, “Homo” indicates a case where c-MET and EBL5 are co-expressed, “Wild / Hetero” indicates a case where only one of c-MET or EBL5 is expressed, and any of these genes In this case, no case is expressed.

図3のカプラン・マイヤー曲線によれば、"Homo"群と"Wild/Hetero"との間において統計学的に優位な差を示した(P=0.0001)(図3)。一方、GEP100又はAMAP1の高レベル発現自体は、そのような優位性は示さなかった(図3)。さらに、図4のカプラン・マイヤー曲線によれば、"Homo"群と"Wild/Hetero"との間において統計学的に優位な差を示した(P=0.0005)(図4)。一方、c−MET又はEBL5の高レベル発現自体は、そのような優位性は示さなかった(図4)。   According to the Kaplan-Meier curve of FIG. 3, there was a statistically significant difference between the “Homo” group and “Wild / Hetero” (P = 0.0001) (FIG. 3). On the other hand, high level expression of GEP100 or AMAP1 itself did not show such superiority (FIG. 3). Furthermore, according to the Kaplan-Meier curve in FIG. 4, there was a statistically significant difference between the “Homo” group and “Wild / Hetero” (P = 0.0005) (FIG. 4). On the other hand, high level expression of c-MET or EBL5 itself did not show such superiority (FIG. 4).

なお、EGFR若しくはHER2自体、又はGEP100若しくはAMAP1の何れかとEGFR若しくはHER2との共発現は、何れも、局所再発の迅速性に対して優位性は示さなかった。   In addition, none of EGFR or HER2 itself, or GEP100 or AMAP1 co-expression with EGFR or HER2 showed any superiority to the rapidity of local recurrence.

浸潤性乳管癌及び非浸潤性乳管癌の早期段階に対する乳房温存療法(BCT)は、優れた局所制御率及び患者の生存を提供する。しかしながら、依然として、BCT後に局所再発を経験する患者の有意な集団が存在する。本実施例においては、BCT後に局所再発を経験した集団に注目した結果、切除断端の状態及び年齢は局所再発までの期間の短さとは相関関係が認められなかったが、GEP100タンパク質及びAMAP1タンパク質の組合せ、並びにc−MET及びEBL5の組合せによる共発現それぞれは、局所再発までの期間の短さに統計学的に優位に相関することが見出された。一方、GEP100、AMAP1、c−MET及びEBL5のうちの何れか1つの発現だけでは、局所再発までの期間の短さとは相関が認められなかった。これらの結果によれば、GEP100、AMAP1、c−MET及びEBL5がArf6経路の成分であると言う仮説と合致しており、つまり、これら遺伝子のうち一つのみの発現では、活性Arf6経路を構成しないことになる。EGFR、HER2、ER又はPgR何れかの発現自体も、過去に報告されている通り局所再発までの期間の短さに相関が無かった(Millar EK, Graham PH, O'Toole SA, et al: Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol 27:4701-8, 2009)。   Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for the early stages of invasive and non-invasive ductal carcinoma provides excellent local control rates and patient survival. However, there is still a significant population of patients who experience local recurrence after BCT. In this example, as a result of paying attention to the population who experienced local recurrence after BCT, the state and age of the resection stump were not correlated with the short period until local recurrence, but GEP100 protein and AMAP1 protein It was found that each of the co-expressions, as well as the co-expression with the combination of c-MET and EBL5, correlated statistically predominantly with the short time to local recurrence. On the other hand, the expression of any one of GEP100, AMAP1, c-MET, and EBL5 was not correlated with the short period until local recurrence. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that GEP100, AMAP1, c-MET and EBL5 are components of the Arf6 pathway, that is, expression of only one of these genes constitutes an active Arf6 pathway. Will not. The expression of any of EGFR, HER2, ER or PgR itself was not correlated with the short time to local recurrence as previously reported (Millar EK, Graham PH, O'Toole SA, et al: Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. J Clin Oncol 27: 4701-8, 2009).

Claims (7)

乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクの予測に用いるためのキットであって、
以下の(i)〜(ii)の組合せのいずれかの2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物のそれぞれを特異的に検出できるタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドを含有する2つの診断薬を含む、キット:
(i)AMAP1及びGEP100、並びに
(ii)EBL5及びC−Met
A kit for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy,
A kit comprising two diagnostic agents containing a protein and / or polypeptide capable of specifically detecting each of the translation products of two genes of any of the following combinations (i) to (ii):
(I) AMAP1 and GEP100, and
(Ii) EBL5 and C-Met .
上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが、抗体及び/又はその断片である、請求項1に記載のキット。The kit according to claim 1, wherein the protein and / or polypeptide is an antibody and / or a fragment thereof. 患者の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測するために、
乳癌乳房温存療法を受けた患者から採取した生体試料において、以下の(i)〜(ii)の組合せのいずれかの2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルをそれぞれ決定すること
含む、乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測するための方法
(i)AMAP1及びGEP100、並びに
(ii)EBL5及びC−Met
To predict a patient's risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy,
In a biological sample collected from a patient who has received breast cancer breast-conserving therapy, the translation product expression levels of any two genes of the following combinations (i) to (ii) are respectively determined:
Methods for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy , including :
(I) AMAP1 and GEP100, and
(Ii) EBL5 and C-Met .
上記生体試料が乳房組織である、請求項に記載の方法。 The method of claim 3 , wherein the biological sample is breast tissue. 上記2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルが、それら遺伝子の翻訳産物をそれぞれ特異的に認識可能なタンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドを用いた免疫組織化学法により決定される、請求項3又は4に記載の方法。 The two gene translation product expression levels are determined the translation product thereof genes by each capable of specifically recognizing the protein and / or polypeptide immunohistochemical method using, according to claim 3 or 4 Method. 上記タンパク質及び/又はポリペプチドが抗体及び/又はその断片である、請求項に記載の方法。 The method according to claim 5 , wherein the protein and / or polypeptide is an antibody and / or a fragment thereof. 前記患者の乳癌乳房温存療法後の局所再発リスクを予測するために用いられる判断基準は、以下の(i)及び(ii)である、請求項3〜6の何れか1項に記載の方法:
(i)決定した上記2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルの全てが、対応する対照の発現レベルよりも高い場合には、上記患者は乳癌の局所再発リスクが高い;
(ii)決定した上記2つの遺伝子の翻訳産物発現レベルのうち一つでも、対応する対照の発現レベルよりも低いか、若しくは同等である場合には、上記患者は乳癌の局所再発リスクが低い。
The method according to any one of claims 3 to 6 , wherein the criteria used to predict the risk of local recurrence after breast cancer breast-conserving therapy for the patient are the following (i) and (ii) :
(I) all determined above two genes translation product expression levels is higher than the corresponding control level of expression, the patient local recurrence risk of breast cancer is not high;
(Ii) in one of the determined above-mentioned two gene translation product expression levels, when or lower than the corresponding control level of expression, or are equivalent, the patient local recurrence risk of breast cancer have low .
JP2013041644A 2013-03-04 2013-03-04 Diagnostic agents and methods for predicting local recurrence risk after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy Expired - Fee Related JP6202362B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013041644A JP6202362B2 (en) 2013-03-04 2013-03-04 Diagnostic agents and methods for predicting local recurrence risk after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013041644A JP6202362B2 (en) 2013-03-04 2013-03-04 Diagnostic agents and methods for predicting local recurrence risk after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2014169917A JP2014169917A (en) 2014-09-18
JP6202362B2 true JP6202362B2 (en) 2017-09-27

Family

ID=51692399

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013041644A Expired - Fee Related JP6202362B2 (en) 2013-03-04 2013-03-04 Diagnostic agents and methods for predicting local recurrence risk after breast-conserving breast cancer therapy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6202362B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6695586B2 (en) * 2015-12-17 2020-05-20 国立大学法人北海道大学 Diagnostic agent and kit for use in predicting recurrence risk of pancreatic cancer, and prediction method
JP2021533817A (en) * 2018-08-09 2021-12-09 リピュオロス インコーポレイテッドRepureus Inc. EPB41L5 protein epitope and monoclonal antibody

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006067968A (en) * 2004-09-06 2006-03-16 Osaka Bioscience Institute Substance for inhibiting invasion and transfer of human cancer cell and method for screening the same
NZ596468A (en) * 2009-05-14 2013-11-29 Nestec Sa Biomarkers for determining sensitivity of breast cancer cells to her2-targeted therapy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2014169917A (en) 2014-09-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yang et al. Discordances in ER, PR and HER2 receptors between primary and recurrent/metastatic lesions and their impact on survival in breast cancer patients
Prati et al. Histopathologic characteristics predicting HER‐2/neu amplification in breast cancer
Gomez-Roca et al. Differential expression of biomarkers in primary non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic sites
Tawfik et al. Clinicopathological correlation of PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer and infiltrating immune cells
Sek et al. HER2 molecular subtype is a dominant subtype of mammary Paget’s cells. An immunohistochemical study
Kobayashi et al. A simple immunohistochemical panel comprising 2 conventional markers, Ki67 and p53, is a powerful tool for predicting patient outcome in luminal-type breast cancer
Nagy et al. Expression of VEGF, VEGFR, EGFR, COX-2 and MVD in cervical carcinoma, in relation with the response to radio-chemotherapy
Li et al. Nuclear localization of GLI1 and elevated expression of FOXC2 in breast cancer is associated with the basal-like phenotype
Hou et al. High expression of the transcriptional co-activator p300 predicts poor survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancers
Matsuoka et al. The tumour stromal features are associated with resistance to 5‐FU‐based chemoradiotherapy and a poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
Hiller et al. Chemokine receptor CXCR4 level in primary tumors independently predicts outcome for patients with locally advanced breast cancer
Harada et al. The significance of HER‐2/neu receptor positivity and immunophenotype in ductal carcinoma in situ with early invasive disease
Mardanpour et al. Coexistence of HER2, Ki67, and p53 in osteosarcoma: a strong prognostic factor
Colbert et al. High nuclear hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha expression is a predictor of distant recurrence in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Narayana et al. P53 overexpression is associated with bulky tumor and poor local control in T1 glottic cancer
Yamazaki et al. High expression of post-treatment Ki-67 status is a risk factor for locoregional recurrence following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Guo et al. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells associated with favorable prognosis in surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Masoumi-Moghaddam et al. Sprouty 1 predicts prognosis in human epithelial ovarian cancer
Ikehara et al. Expression of cyclin D1 but not of cyclin E is an indicator of poor prognosis in small adenocarcinomas of the lung
Zhao et al. Drug resistance gene expression and chemotherapy sensitivity detection in Chinese women with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer
Dalbagni et al. Prospective evaluation of p53 as a prognostic marker in T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
Adell et al. Decreased tumor cell proliferation as an indicator of the effect of preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer
Peng et al. Prediction of treatment outcome by CD44v6 after total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer
Schuur et al. Breast cancer: molecular mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment
Choi et al. Immunohistochemical biomarkers in patients with early-onset breast carcinoma by tissue microarray

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20160302

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20170126

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20170207

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20170330

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20170725

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20170817

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6202362

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees