JP6153552B2 - Simple evaluation method for oil - Google Patents

Simple evaluation method for oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6153552B2
JP6153552B2 JP2015026078A JP2015026078A JP6153552B2 JP 6153552 B2 JP6153552 B2 JP 6153552B2 JP 2015026078 A JP2015026078 A JP 2015026078A JP 2015026078 A JP2015026078 A JP 2015026078A JP 6153552 B2 JP6153552 B2 JP 6153552B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
oil
evaluation
soil
fat
evaluation method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2015026078A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2016148605A (en
Inventor
謙三 久保田
謙三 久保田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd filed Critical Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd
Priority to JP2015026078A priority Critical patent/JP6153552B2/en
Publication of JP2016148605A publication Critical patent/JP2016148605A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6153552B2 publication Critical patent/JP6153552B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は、油の簡易評価方法に関するものであり、さらに詳しくは簡単な方法でありながら油(特に汚染土壌の油)の有無を正確に評価することができる評価方法に関するものである。また、発光度合を比較することによって、対象物の油量の多少や複数の対象物間の相対評価を簡単に行うことができる評価方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a simple oil evaluation method, and more particularly to an evaluation method capable of accurately evaluating the presence or absence of oil (especially oil in contaminated soil) while being a simple method. Further, the present invention relates to an evaluation method that can easily perform relative evaluation between a plurality of objects and the amount of oil of the object by comparing the light emission levels.

近年、工場やガソリンスタンドなどの跡地を再利用する際に、跡地の土壌が鉱物油やその他の化学物質に汚染されている場合があり、これら汚染土壌への対策が必要になっている。   In recent years, when a site such as a factory or a gas station is reused, the soil in the site is sometimes contaminated with mineral oil or other chemical substances, and countermeasures against these contaminated soils are required.

このような油によって汚染されている土壌は通常、汚染がされているか否かを目視や臭気によって判断している。   The soil contaminated with such oil usually determines whether it is contaminated by visual observation or odor.

また、油の有無を評価する方法として各種の技術も開発されている(特許文献1〜4参照)。また、土壌の油分の評価に特化した方法も各種の技術が開発されている(特許文献5〜7参照)。   Various techniques have also been developed as methods for evaluating the presence or absence of oil (see Patent Documents 1 to 4). Various techniques have also been developed for methods specialized in the evaluation of soil oil content (see Patent Documents 5 to 7).

特許第4654894号公報Japanese Patent No. 4654894 特許第4816600号公報Japanese Patent No. 4816600 特許第5087063号公報Japanese Patent No. 5087063 特許第5298602号公報Japanese Patent No. 5298602 特開2008−8622号公報JP 2008-8622 A 特許第3949487号公報Japanese Patent No. 3949487 特開2003−344289号公報JP 2003-344289 A

しかしながら、特許文献1〜4の評価方法は、複雑な画像処理やデータ加工(特許文献1〜3参照)が必要であったり、複雑な光学機器(特許文献4参照)を必要とすることから設備が大掛かりなものになってしまうという問題がある。   However, the evaluation methods of Patent Literatures 1 to 4 require complicated image processing and data processing (see Patent Literatures 1 to 3), and complicated optical equipment (see Patent Literature 4). There is a problem that becomes a large-scale.

また、特許文献5〜7の評価方法は、いずれも有機溶媒や蛍光体などの処理剤を土壌に適用しなければならず、程度の差はあるものの環境負荷を与えてしまうという問題がある(特許文献5の段落[0001]などを参照)。特に特許文献7の評価方法においては、土壌に蛍光粉末を直接散布することから、土壌に対して環境負荷を与えてしまうという問題がある。
また、特許文献5、6の評価方法においては、予め土壌の油分を有機溶媒で抽出しなければならず、評価に時間を要してしまうという問題もある。
Moreover, all the evaluation methods of Patent Literatures 5 to 7 have to apply a treatment agent such as an organic solvent or a phosphor to the soil, and there is a problem that although there is a difference in degree, an environmental load is given ( (See paragraph [0001] in Patent Document 5). In particular, in the evaluation method of Patent Document 7, since fluorescent powder is directly sprayed on the soil, there is a problem of giving an environmental load to the soil.
Moreover, in the evaluation method of patent document 5, 6, the oil component of soil must be extracted with an organic solvent previously, and there also exists a problem that evaluation requires time.

さらに、鉱物油などの汚染物質が含まれていない(浄化対策が必要ではない)土壌であっても、実際の土壌はある程度の油分を有している。また、このような土壌の中には、肥料として混合された油粕など、汚染に繋がらない油分が大部分を占める土壌もある。しかし、このようないわゆる正常な土壌でも特許文献5〜7の評価方法で評価してしまうとこれらの油分を全て抽出して評価することになるため油分が多い土壌と判定されてしまい、その結果、本来浄化対策が必要ではないにもかかわらず浄化対策が必要であるとの誤った評価を下してしまうという問題もある。   Furthermore, even soil that does not contain contaminants such as mineral oil (no remedial action is required), the actual soil has a certain amount of oil. Some of these soils occupy most of the oil that does not lead to contamination, such as oil cake mixed as fertilizer. However, even if such so-called normal soil is evaluated by the evaluation methods of Patent Documents 5 to 7, all of these oils are extracted and evaluated, so that it is determined that the soil is rich in oils. However, there is also a problem that a false evaluation that a purification measure is necessary even though a purification measure is not originally required is made.

また、目視や臭気によって油によって汚染されていると判定された土壌については浄化処理が行われることになるが、かかる処理作業が終了した後には、油の浄化が完了しているかについて土壌の一部をサンプリングして詳細な分析をして確認をしているのが現状である。従って、かかる分析が終了するまでは実際の施工作業等、次工程に進むことができず、工期が長期化してしまうという問題があった。また、分析費用も高額になることからコスト面においても問題があった。   In addition, soil that has been determined to be contaminated with oil by visual inspection or odor is subjected to purification treatment. After such treatment work is completed, it is determined whether or not the oil purification has been completed. The current situation is that the part is sampled and analyzed in detail. Accordingly, there is a problem in that the actual construction work or the like cannot proceed to the next process until the analysis is completed, and the construction period is prolonged. In addition, there is a problem in terms of cost because the analysis cost is high.

今回、本願発明者らは鋭意検討した結果、脂溶性色素を用いることによって、極めて簡単に且つ正確に油(特に汚染土壌の油)の有無を評価することができるという知見を得るに至った。
また、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を汚染土壌の評価に用いた場合には、水面に浮かんでくる油分(土壌から遊離する油分)を評価することができ、浄化対策が必要である土壌であるか否かを簡単に且つ正確に評価することができるという知見を得るに至った。
As a result of intensive studies, the present inventors have come to the knowledge that the presence or absence of oil (especially oil in contaminated soil) can be evaluated very easily and accurately by using a fat-soluble dye.
Moreover, when the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention is used for the evaluation of contaminated soil, the oil floating on the water surface (oil free from the soil) can be evaluated, and soil for which purification measures are necessary It has come to the knowledge that it can be easily and accurately evaluated whether or not.

本発明は、上記した従来の問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、簡単な方法でありながら油(特に汚染土壌の油)の有無を正確に評価することができる油の簡易評価方法の提供を目的とする。
また、発光度合を比較することによって、対象物の油量の多少や複数の対象物間の相対評価を簡単に行うことができる評価方法に関するものである。
さらに、浄化処理後の確認作業(評価)を簡便かつ客観的に行うことができる評価方法に関するものである。
The present invention has been made in view of the conventional problems described above, and is a simple oil evaluation method that can accurately evaluate the presence or absence of oil (especially oil in contaminated soil) while being a simple method. For the purpose of provision.
Further, the present invention relates to an evaluation method that can easily perform relative evaluation between a plurality of objects and the amount of oil of the object by comparing the light emission levels.
Furthermore, it is related with the evaluation method which can perform the confirmation work (evaluation) after a purification process simply and objectively.

上記目的を達成するために、本発明の請求項1に係る油の簡易評価方法は、内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器に白色に着色した水を供給する水供給工程と、水供給工程の次工程として、評価対象物を容器に供給する評価対象物供給工程と、水面に存在する油膜に脂溶性色素溶液を混合する脂溶性色素溶液混合工程と、脂溶性色素溶液混合工程の後に、水面に紫外線または赤外線を照射する照射工程を有し、油膜の発光度合から油の有無または/および油量の多少を評価することを特徴とする。
In order to achieve the above object, a simple oil evaluation method according to claim 1 of the present invention includes a water supply step of supplying white colored water to a container having an inner wall made of an oil repellent material, As the next process of the supplying process, there are an evaluation object supplying process for supplying the evaluation object to the container, a fat-soluble dye solution mixing process for mixing the fat-soluble dye solution with the oil film present on the water surface, and a fat-soluble dye solution mixing process. It is characterized by having an irradiation step of irradiating the water surface with ultraviolet rays or infrared rays, and evaluating the presence or absence of oil and / or the amount of oil from the light emission degree of the oil film.

本発明の請求項に係る油の簡易評価方法は、評価対象物供給工程、油汚染された土壌を容器に混合する土壌混合工程であることを特徴とする。
Simple evaluation method of oil according to claim 2 of the present invention, the evaluation object supplying step, wherein the soil mixing process der Rukoto mixing the oil contaminated soil in a container.

本発明の請求項に係る油の簡易評価方法は、脂溶性色素溶液が、クルクミン溶液またはオイルレッド溶液であることを特徴とする。
The simple oil evaluation method according to claim 3 of the present invention is characterized in that the fat-soluble dye solution is a curcumin solution or an oil red solution.

本発明の請求項に係る油の簡易評価方法は、照射工程の際の油膜の発光度合を数値化する数値化工程と、数値化工程によって数値化した値から油の有無または/および油量の多少を評価する評価工程を有することを特徴とする。
The oil simple evaluation method according to claim 4 of the present invention includes a numerical process for quantifying the degree of luminescence of the oil film during the irradiation process, and the presence or absence of oil and / or the amount of oil from the value quantified by the numerical process. It has the evaluation process which evaluates the some of these.

本発明の請求項に係る油の簡易評価方法は、数値化工程が、油膜の発光度合を256階調に変換するものであることを特徴とする。
The simple oil evaluation method according to claim 5 of the present invention is characterized in that the digitizing step converts the luminous intensity of the oil film into 256 gradations.

本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法によれば、油膜に脂溶性色素溶液を混合することで油分に脂溶性色素溶液が溶け込む際の発色が鮮明になる現象を利用し、紫外線または赤外線を照射した際の発光度合に基づいて評価を行うので、微量の油であっても簡単且つ正確に油の有無を評価することができる。また、今まで目視評価において問題なし(浄化対策の必要なし)と判断していたものであっても油の有無を正当に評価することができ、適切な対応を取ることができることになる。
さらに、発光度合を比較することによって、複数の対象物間の相対評価を簡単に行うこともできることになる。
According to the simple method for evaluating oil according to the present invention, ultraviolet rays or infrared rays are irradiated by utilizing a phenomenon in which a fat-soluble dye solution is mixed with an oil film and the color developed when the fat-soluble dye solution is dissolved in the oil component becomes clear. Since the evaluation is performed based on the degree of luminescence at the time, the presence or absence of oil can be easily and accurately evaluated even with a small amount of oil. Moreover, even if it has been determined that there is no problem in the visual evaluation until now (no need for purification measures), the presence or absence of oil can be properly evaluated, and an appropriate response can be taken.
Furthermore, by comparing the light emission levels, a relative evaluation between a plurality of objects can be easily performed.

本発明の請求項2に係る油の簡易評価方法によれば、内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器を用いているので、油が容器内壁面に付着することがなくなることから油が視認しやすくなり、より正確な評価をすることができる。
According to the simple oil evaluation method according to claim 2 of the present invention, since the container whose inner wall surface is made of an oil-repellent material is used, the oil does not adhere to the inner wall surface of the container. Becomes easier to visually recognize, and more accurate evaluation can be performed.

本発明の請求項3に係る油の簡易評価方法によれば、油で汚染された土壌についても簡単且つ正確に油の有無を評価することができる。
また、土壌から遊離する油分を評価することができることから、従前のように土壌中の全ての油分を抽出して評価してしまうという事態を防止することができ、本当に浄化対策が必要である土壌であるか否かを簡単に且つ正確に評価することができる。
また、今まで目視において問題なし(浄化対策の必要なし)と判断していた土壌であっても油の有無を正当に評価することができ、適切な対応を取ることができることになる。
さらに、発光度合を比較することによって、複数の対象土壌間の相対評価を簡単に行うこともできることになる。
According to the simple oil evaluation method according to claim 3 of the present invention, it is possible to easily and accurately evaluate the presence or absence of oil even in soil contaminated with oil.
In addition, since it is possible to evaluate the oil released from the soil, it is possible to prevent the situation in which all the oil in the soil is extracted and evaluated as before, and soil that really needs cleanup measures. It is possible to easily and accurately evaluate whether or not.
Moreover, the presence or absence of oil can be legitimately evaluated even for soil that has been visually judged to have no problem (no need for purification measures), and an appropriate response can be taken.
Furthermore, the relative evaluation between the plurality of target soils can be easily performed by comparing the luminescence levels.

本発明の請求項4に係る油の簡易評価方法によれば、脂溶性色素溶液に特定の材料を用いることによって、より効果的に油の有無を評価することができる。   According to the simple oil evaluation method according to claim 4 of the present invention, the presence or absence of oil can be more effectively evaluated by using a specific material for the fat-soluble dye solution.

本発明の請求項5に係る油の簡易評価方法によれば、数値化工程を256階調とすることによって、簡単且つより正確に油の有無を評価することができる。また、油の有無という定性的な評価だけでなく、対象物の油量の多少や複数の対象物間における油量の多少という定量的な評価も行うことができる。   According to the simple oil evaluation method according to claim 5 of the present invention, the presence or absence of oil can be evaluated easily and more accurately by setting the numerical value process to 256 gradations. In addition to the qualitative evaluation of the presence or absence of oil, it is possible to perform a quantitative evaluation of the amount of oil in an object or the amount of oil between a plurality of objects.

本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を実施する際の状態を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the state at the time of implementing the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention. 内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器を用いて本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を実施する際の状態を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the state at the time of implementing the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention using the container by which the inner wall surface was comprised with the oil-repellent material. 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて汚染土壌の油分を評価した際の状態を示す写真である。It is a photograph which shows the state at the time of evaluating the oil content of contaminated soil using the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて汚染土壌の油分を評価した際の別の状態を示す写真である。It is a photograph which shows another state at the time of evaluating the oil content of contaminated soil using the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて汚染されていない土壌を評価した際の状態を示す写真である。It is a photograph which shows the state at the time of evaluating the soil which is not polluted using the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて水面に存在する油膜の油分を評価した結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of having evaluated the oil content of the oil film which exists in the water surface using the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて作為的に油分濃度を変化させた土壌の油分を評価した結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of having evaluated the oil content of the soil which changed the oil concentration artificially using the simple evaluation method of the oil which concerns on this invention. 図7の結果を示す写真である。It is a photograph which shows the result of FIG. 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて実際の汚染土壌の油分を評価した結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the result of having evaluated the oil content of the actual contaminated soil using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention.

本発明の実施形態を図面に基づいて説明する。なお、以下に述べる実施形態は本発明を具体化した一例に過ぎず、本発明の技術的範囲を限定するものでない。   Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The embodiment described below is merely an example embodying the present invention, and does not limit the technical scope of the present invention.

(第一の実施形態)
まず、本発明にかかる油の簡易評価方法は、水面に存在する油膜に対して脂溶性色素溶液混合工程、照射工程の2つの工程を施すことを必須とする。図1は本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を実施する際の状態を示す模式図である。以下、各工程について説明する。
(First embodiment)
First, the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention requires that two steps of a fat-soluble dye solution mixing step and an irradiation step are performed on an oil film existing on the water surface. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a state when a simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention is carried out. Hereinafter, each step will be described.

(脂溶性色素溶液混合工程)
まず、水1を張った上記容器2aに評価対象物である油を含む液体(または油を含む水)を供給する。そうすると水面3に油分4が集まるようになる。
次に、油分4が存在する水1に脂溶性色素溶液(図示せず)を混合することによって脂溶性色素を油分4に溶解させることによって発色させる。なお、油膜が存在する水と脂溶性色素溶液との混合の仕方については各種の方法を採用することができ、例えば撹拌装置を用いて混合する方法や油膜が存在する水面に脂溶性色素溶液を滴下させて混合する方法などを挙げることができる。
なお、本実施形態においては水を張った容器を用いたが、既に油膜が浮かんでいる水面などの評価を行う場合には、かかる水面に直接脂溶性色素溶液を混合することによって脂溶性色素を発色させる。
(Fat-soluble dye solution mixing process)
First, a liquid (or water containing oil) containing oil as an evaluation object is supplied to the container 2a filled with water 1. As a result, the oil 4 is collected on the water surface 3.
Next, the water-soluble dye solution (not shown) is mixed with the water 1 in which the oil component 4 is present, whereby the fat-soluble pigment is dissolved in the oil component 4 to cause color development. Various methods can be adopted for mixing the water in which the oil film exists and the fat-soluble dye solution. For example, a method of mixing using a stirrer or a fat-soluble dye solution on the water surface in which the oil film is present. The method of dripping and mixing can be mentioned.
In this embodiment, a container filled with water is used. However, when evaluating a water surface where an oil film has already floated, the fat-soluble dye is mixed by directly mixing the fat-soluble dye solution with the water surface. Let the color develop.

ここで、本発明に用いられる脂溶性色素溶液とは、脂溶性色素を水または有機溶媒に溶解させたものである。また、脂溶性色素としては後記する照射工程によって紫外線または赤外線を照射した際に発光するものであれば各種のものを使用することができるが、油に対する発色力の高さや溶解力の高さからクルクミンまたはオイルレッドを用いることが好ましい。また、有機溶媒については水との溶解性を考慮して低級アルコール類を用いることが好ましい。なお、脂溶性色素の濃度としては評価する油の種類などに応じて適宜決定されるものであるが、0.1〜0.5重量%とすることが好ましい。   Here, the fat-soluble dye solution used in the present invention is obtained by dissolving a fat-soluble dye in water or an organic solvent. In addition, as the fat-soluble pigment, various pigments can be used as long as they emit light when irradiated with ultraviolet rays or infrared rays in an irradiation step described later. From the viewpoint of high coloring power and high dissolving power to oil. It is preferable to use curcumin or oil red. As for the organic solvent, it is preferable to use lower alcohols in consideration of solubility in water. The concentration of the fat-soluble pigment is appropriately determined according to the type of oil to be evaluated, but is preferably 0.1 to 0.5% by weight.

(照射工程)
次に、脂溶性色素溶液を混合した容器を静置した後、使用した脂溶性色素に応じて紫外線または赤外線を上記の水面に照射する。具体的には、クルクミン溶液を用いた場合には紫外線(市販されているブラックライトなど)を照射し、オイルレッド溶液を用いた場合には赤外線(市販されているハロゲンライトなど)を照射する。
そうすると、水面に油分が存在する場合には油分が脂溶性色素溶液に溶け込むことによって発色し、さらに紫外線や赤外線を照射することによって発光して視認しやすくなることから、かかる発光度合を評価することで微量の油であっても簡単且つ正確に油の有無を評価することができる。
(Irradiation process)
Next, after leaving the container in which the fat-soluble dye solution is mixed, the water surface is irradiated with ultraviolet rays or infrared rays according to the used fat-soluble dye. Specifically, ultraviolet rays (such as commercially available black light) are irradiated when a curcumin solution is used, and infrared rays (such as commercially available halogen light) are irradiated when an oil red solution is used.
Then, when oil is present on the surface of the water, the oil is colored by dissolving in the fat-soluble dye solution, and it becomes easier to visually recognize and emit light by irradiating with ultraviolet rays or infrared rays. Thus, the presence or absence of oil can be easily and accurately evaluated even with a small amount of oil.

なお、デジタルカメラなどを用いるとともに必要に応じて各種のレンズフィルターも併用して画像をデジタル化(データ化)すれば、発光度合をより正確に評価することができ、また複数の対象物間の相対評価をする際においても正確な相対評価を行うことができるので好適である。   In addition, if a digital camera is used and various lens filters are used together as necessary to digitize the image (data), the degree of light emission can be evaluated more accurately, and between multiple objects. It is preferable because accurate relative evaluation can be performed even when performing relative evaluation.

(第二の実施形態)
また、本発明にかかる油の簡易評価方法は、内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器を用いることによって評価の精度をより向上させることができる。以下そのための工程を説明する。図2は内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器を用いて本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を実施する際の状態を示す模式図である。
(Second embodiment)
Moreover, the simple evaluation method of the oil concerning this invention can improve the precision of evaluation more by using the container by which the inner wall surface was comprised with the oil-repellent material. The process for that will be described below. FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing a state when the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention is carried out using a container having an inner wall made of an oil-repellent material.

(水供給工程)
かかる実施形態においては、まず内壁面5が撥油性の材料で構成された容器2bに水1を張っておく。なお、このような容器としてはポリスチレンやフッ素系樹脂などの材質で作製されたものが挙げられる。
(Water supply process)
In such an embodiment, first, water 1 is spread on a container 2b whose inner wall surface 5 is made of an oil-repellent material. In addition, as such a container, what was produced with materials, such as a polystyrene and a fluorine resin, is mentioned.

(評価対象物供給工程)
次に、水1を張った上記容器2bに評価対象物である油を含む液体(または油を含む水)を供給する。そうすると図2に示すように油分4は容器2bの内壁面5には接触せずに、内壁面5よりも内側に集まるようになる。
そしてその後、油分4が容器2bの内側に集まっている状態において、上記した脂溶性色素溶液混合工程、照射工程を実施して油の有無を評価する。
(Evaluation target supply process)
Next, a liquid (or water containing oil) containing oil as an evaluation object is supplied to the container 2b filled with water 1. Then, as shown in FIG. 2, the oil component 4 does not come into contact with the inner wall surface 5 of the container 2 b but gathers inside the inner wall surface 5.
And after that, in the state where the oil component 4 has gathered inside the container 2b, the above-mentioned fat-soluble dye solution mixing process and irradiation process are implemented and the presence or absence of oil is evaluated.

従って、水供給工程および評価対象物供給工程を備える本実施形態は、発色した油をより視認しやすくすることができるとともに、発色度合にバラツキがなくなることからより正確な評価をすることができることになる。
一方、内壁面が親油性の材料で構成された容器を用いた場合には、多くの油分は表面張力によって内壁面に集まってしまうことになることから、脂溶性色素溶液混合工程で発色を行った際には発色度合にバラツキが生じてしまう(内壁面の近傍の発色度合は高くなるが、中心部の発色度合は少なくなってしまう)ことになり、正確な評価をすることが困難になる。
Therefore, the present embodiment including the water supply step and the evaluation object supply step can make the colored oil more easily visible and can perform more accurate evaluation because there is no variation in the degree of color development. Become.
On the other hand, when using a container whose inner wall surface is made of an oleophilic material, a large amount of oil is collected on the inner wall surface due to surface tension. When this occurs, the degree of coloration will vary (the degree of coloration near the inner wall surface will increase, but the degree of coloration in the center will decrease), making accurate evaluation difficult. .

(第三の実施形態)
また、本発明にかかる油の簡易評価方法は、汚染土壌の油分の評価にも用いることができる。以下そのための工程を説明する。図3は本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて汚染土壌の油分を評価した際の状態を示す写真であり、図4は 本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて汚染土壌の油分を評価した際の別の状態を示す写真であり、図5は本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて汚染されていない土壌を評価した際の状態を示す写真である。
かかる実施形態においては、第二の実施形態における評価対象物供給工程が、油汚染された土壌を容器に混合する土壌混合工程となること以外は第二の実施形態と同様の工程を行うことになる。
(Third embodiment)
Moreover, the simple evaluation method of the oil concerning this invention can be used also for evaluation of the oil content of contaminated soil. The process for that will be described below. FIG. 3 is a photograph showing the state when the oil content of the contaminated soil is evaluated using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention, and FIG. 4 is the oil content of the contaminated soil using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention. FIG. 5 is a photograph showing a state when soil that has not been contaminated is evaluated using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention.
In this embodiment, the evaluation object supply process in the second embodiment is the same as the second embodiment except that the soil contaminated with oil is mixed in a container. Become.

(土壌混合工程)
まず、第二の実施形態において記載した水供給工程を行う。
次に、水を張った容器(内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器)に油汚染された汚染土壌6を混合する。なおこの際、撹拌装置を用いて土壌中の油分を水中に分散させても良い。
そしてその後、油分が容器の内側に集まっている状態において、上記した脂溶性色素溶液混合工程、照射工程を実施し、油の有無を評価する。
(Soil mixing process)
First, the water supply process described in the second embodiment is performed.
Next, the contaminated soil 6 contaminated with oil is mixed in a container filled with water (a container whose inner wall surface is made of an oil repellent material). At this time, the oil in the soil may be dispersed in water using a stirring device.
Then, in the state where the oil is gathered inside the container, the above-described fat-soluble dye solution mixing step and irradiation step are performed to evaluate the presence or absence of oil.

なお、図4は水に少量の白色絵具を溶解させて下地となる水面を白色にして本実施形態を行った状態を示す写真であるが、このようにすれば発光度合をより視認しやすくなるので好適である。   Note that FIG. 4 is a photograph showing a state in which the present embodiment is performed by dissolving a small amount of white paint in water to make the water surface as a base white, but this makes it easier to visually recognize the degree of light emission. Therefore, it is preferable.

さらに、図5は汚染されていない土壌7を評価した際の状態を示す写真であるが、水面に浮かんでくる油分(土壌から遊離する油分)がない場合には発色がほとんどないことから簡単に且つ正確に油の有無を評価することができることになる。
従って、本発明にかかる油の簡易評価方法によれば、評価対象物が油分を含んだ汚染土壌であっても油の有無を正確に評価することができることになる。
Further, FIG. 5 is a photograph showing the state when the uncontaminated soil 7 is evaluated, but it is simply because there is almost no coloration when there is no oil floating on the water surface (oil free from the soil). And the presence or absence of oil can be accurately evaluated.
Therefore, according to the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention, the presence or absence of oil can be accurately evaluated even if the object to be evaluated is contaminated soil containing oil.

(第四の実施形態)
最後に、本発明にかかる油の簡易評価方法の第四の実施形態を説明する。
かかる実施形態においては、第一〜第三の実施形態における照射工程の際の脂溶性色素の発光度合を数値化する数値化工程と、かかる数値化工程によって数値化した値から油の有無または/および油量の多少を評価する評価工程を有する以外は第一〜第三の実施形態と同様の工程を行うことになる。以下そのための工程を説明する。
(Fourth embodiment)
Finally, a fourth embodiment of a simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention will be described.
In such an embodiment, the presence or absence of oil or / or from the quantification step for quantifying the luminescence degree of the fat-soluble dye in the irradiation step in the first to third embodiments, and the value quantified by the quantification step And the process similar to 1st-3rd embodiment will be performed except having the evaluation process which evaluates the some of oil quantity. The process for that will be described below.

まず、第一の実施形態において記載した照射工程までを行う。なお、必要に応じて、第二の実施形態に記載した水供給工程、評価対象物供給工程や第三の実施形態に記載した土壌混合工程を行う。   First, the irradiation process described in the first embodiment is performed. In addition, the water mixing process described in 2nd embodiment, the evaluation target object supply process, and the soil mixing process described in 3rd embodiment are performed as needed.

(数値化工程)
次に、照射工程において紫外線または赤外線を照射した際の発光度合を数値化する。
数値化の手法としては、簡単な二値化処理や複雑な各種のアルゴリズム処理などの様々な手法を採用することもできるが、数値化が容易であり、且つ評価精度が高い点から発光量を256階調に変換するものであることが好ましい。
(Numericalization process)
Next, the light emission degree when ultraviolet rays or infrared rays are irradiated in the irradiation step is quantified.
Although various methods such as simple binarization processing and various complex algorithm processing can be adopted as a numerical method, the amount of light emission is reduced from the viewpoint of easy numericalization and high evaluation accuracy. It is preferable to convert to 256 gradations.

具体的には、まず、紫外線または赤外線を照射した際の発光度合をデジタルカメラで撮影する。
次に、発光度合の差異が明確になるように必要に応じて撮影した画像の明度やコントラストなどの調整を行う。最後に、かかる画像の発光度合を256階調(グレースケール)または256階調(フルカラー)で数値化する。
Specifically, first, the degree of light emission when ultraviolet rays or infrared rays are irradiated is photographed with a digital camera.
Next, the brightness and contrast of the captured image are adjusted as necessary so that the difference in light emission level becomes clear. Finally, the luminous intensity of such an image is digitized in 256 gradations (grayscale) or 256 gradations (full color).

(評価工程)
次に、上記数値化工程によって数値化した値から油の有無または/および油量の多少を評価する。
ここで、段落[0008]にも記載したとおり、評価対象物が土壌である場合には正常な(浄化対策が必要ではない)土壌であっても、ある程度の油分を有している。
従って、水面に浮かんでくる油分(土壌から遊離する油分)を評価することができ、さらにかかる油分を数値化することができる本実施形態は、油の有無という定性的な評価だけでなく、対象物の油量の多少や複数の対象物間における油量の多少という定量的な評価も行うことができる。すなわち、第一の実施形態における照射工程に比べてより定量的な評価を行うことができることになり、浄化対策の必要性の判断だけでなく、浄化方法を選択する観点からも簡単に且つ正確(適切)な判断を行うことができることになる。
(Evaluation process)
Next, the presence or absence of oil and / or the amount of oil is evaluated from the values quantified by the above quantification step.
Here, as described in Paragraph [0008], when the evaluation object is soil, even if it is normal (cleanup measures are not required), it has a certain amount of oil.
Therefore, this embodiment, which can evaluate the oil floating on the water surface (oil free from the soil) and further quantify such oil, is not only a qualitative evaluation of the presence of oil, Quantitative evaluation of the amount of oil in an object or the amount of oil between a plurality of objects can also be performed. That is, a more quantitative evaluation can be performed as compared with the irradiation process in the first embodiment, and it is easy and accurate from the viewpoint of selecting a purification method as well as determining the necessity of a purification measure ( (Appropriate) judgment can be made.

次に、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を実施例に基づいて詳しく説明する。なお、本発明は以下の実施例に限定されるものではない。図6は本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて水面に存在する油膜の油分を評価した結果を示すグラフであり、図7は本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて作為的に油分濃度を変化させた土壌の油分を評価した結果を示すグラフであり、図8は図7の結果を示す写真であり、図9は本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いて実際の汚染土壌の油分を評価した結果を示すグラフである。   Next, a simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention will be described in detail based on examples. In addition, this invention is not limited to a following example. FIG. 6 is a graph showing the results of evaluating the oil content of the oil film present on the water surface using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention, and FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the result of the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention. FIG. 8 is a photograph showing the result of evaluating the oil content of soil with varying oil concentration, FIG. 8 is a photograph showing the result of FIG. 7, and FIG. 9 is the actual contamination using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention. It is a graph which shows the result of having evaluated the oil content of soil.

(実施例1)
まず、開口直径:90mm、深さ:15mmのポリスチレン製容器に水を50ml入れたものを4つ用意し、それぞれの容器に軽油を10μl、30μl、50μl入れたものと、ブランクとして軽油を入れないものを作製した。
次に、各容器に0.3wt%のオイルレッド2−プロパノール溶液(脂溶性色素溶液)を100μl入れ、軽油にオイルレッドを溶解させた。
次に、5分静置した後、ハロゲンライトを照射してオイルレッドを発光させ、CCDカメラを用いてポリスチレン製容器の画像を撮影するとともに256階調(グレースケール)を用いて発光量を255段階で数値化した。結果を図6に示す。
Example 1
First, prepare 4 bottles containing 50 ml of water in a polystyrene container with an opening diameter of 90 mm and a depth of 15 mm. Fill each container with 10 μl, 30 μl, and 50 μl of light oil, and do not fill with light oil as a blank. Things were made.
Next, 100 μl of a 0.3 wt% oil red 2-propanol solution (fat-soluble dye solution) was placed in each container, and oil red was dissolved in light oil.
Next, after leaving for 5 minutes, oil light is emitted by irradiating with a halogen light, and an image of a polystyrene container is taken using a CCD camera, and the light emission amount is set to 255 using 256 gradations (grayscale). Quantified in stages. The results are shown in FIG.

その結果、油量と数値とが高い相関係数の下に比例関係にあることが確認できた。また、油量が10μlという少量であっても評価が可能(ブランクとは異なるとの評価が可能)となることが確認できた。従って、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いることで簡単且つ正確に油の有無を評価できることが確認できた。   As a result, it was confirmed that the oil amount and the numerical value have a proportional relationship under a high correlation coefficient. It was also confirmed that the evaluation was possible even when the amount of oil was as small as 10 μl (evaluation that it was different from the blank was possible). Therefore, it was confirmed that the presence or absence of oil can be easily and accurately evaluated by using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention.

(実施例2)
次に、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法が土壌の油分の評価にも適用できることを確認するために、作為的に油分濃度を変化させた土壌の油分の評価を行った。
まず、洗浄した土壌100gに軽油を1000mg/kg、3000mg/kg、5000mg/kgの濃度になるように混合したものと、ブランクとして軽油を混合しないものを作製した。
次に、開口直径:90mm、深さ:15mmのポリスチレン製容器に水を50g入れたものを4つ用意し、それぞれの容器に上記の土壌5gを入れて軽く撹拌した。
次に、各容器に0.3wt%のオイルレッド2−プロパノール溶液(脂溶性色素溶液)を100μl入れ、軽油にオイルレッドを溶解させた。
次に、5分静置した後、ハロゲンライトを照射して脂溶性色素を発光させ、CCDカメラを用いてポリスチレン製容器の画像を撮影するとともに256階調(グレースケール)を用いて発光量を255段階で数値化した。結果を図7および図8に示す。
(Example 2)
Next, in order to confirm that the simple method for evaluating oil according to the present invention can be applied to the evaluation of soil oil, the oil content of soil in which the oil concentration was artificially changed was evaluated.
First, what mixed light oil with the density | concentration of 1000 mg / kg, 3000 mg / kg, and 5000 mg / kg to 100 g of wash | cleaned soil, and the thing which does not mix light oil as a blank were produced.
Next, 4 pieces of 50 g of water in a polystyrene container having an opening diameter of 90 mm and a depth of 15 mm were prepared, and 5 g of the above soil was put in each container and lightly stirred.
Next, 100 μl of a 0.3 wt% oil red 2-propanol solution (fat-soluble dye solution) was placed in each container, and oil red was dissolved in light oil.
Next, after standing for 5 minutes, irradiate with halogen light to cause the fat-soluble dye to emit light, take an image of a polystyrene container using a CCD camera, and adjust the amount of light emission using 256 gradations (grayscale). Digitized in 255 steps. The results are shown in FIG. 7 and FIG.

その結果、汚染土壌においても油量と数値とが高い相関係数の下に比例関係にあることが確認できた。また、汚染濃度が1000mg/kgという低濃度であっても評価が可能(ブランクとは異なるとの評価が可能)となることが確認できた。従って、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法を用いることで汚染土壌においても簡単且つ正確に油の有無を評価できることが確認できた。   As a result, even in the contaminated soil, it was confirmed that the oil amount and the numerical value were proportional to each other under a high correlation coefficient. In addition, it was confirmed that the evaluation can be performed even when the contamination concentration is as low as 1000 mg / kg (evaluation that it is different from the blank is possible). Therefore, it was confirmed that the presence or absence of oil can be evaluated easily and accurately even in contaminated soil by using the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention.

(実施例3)
次に、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法が汚染土壌の評価として有用であることを確認するために汚染土壌の油分の評価を行った。
まず、洗浄した土壌100gに軽油を10000mg/kgの濃度になるように混合したもの(汚染土壌)を作製した。
次に、作製した汚染土壌に活性炭を0.5wt%、1.0wt%、2.0wt%混合することによって段階的に軽油の吸着処理を行った3種類の土壌を作製するとともに、ブランクとして活性炭を入れない土壌(汚染土壌そのもの)を準備した。
次に、開口直径:90mm、深さ:15mmのポリスチレン製容器に水を50g入れたものを4つ用意し、それぞれの容器に上記の土壌を各5gずつ入れて軽く撹拌した。
次に、各容器の油膜について、従来の評価手法である4段階による目視評価を行った。なお、目視評価においては油膜レベルが2以上である場合に浄化対策が必要であると判断した。各段階の評価基準は以下のとおりである。
油膜レベル0:油膜が認識できない状態(浄化対策の必要なし)
油膜レベル1:水面に白い膜が浮んでいる状態(浄化対策の必要なし)
油膜レベル2:水面に七色の油膜の干渉縞が浮んでいる状態(浄化対策が必要)
油膜レベル3:明らかに油膜が認識できる状態(浄化対策が必要)
次に、各容器に0.3wt%のオイルレッド2−プロパノール溶液(脂溶性色素溶液)を100mg入れ、軽油にオイルレッドを溶解させた。
次に、5分静置した後、ハロゲンライトを照射して脂溶性色素を発光させ、CCDカメラを用いてポリスチレン製容器の画像を撮影するとともに256階調(グレースケール)を用いて発光量を255段階で数値化した。結果を目視評価の結果とともに図9に示す。
(Example 3)
Next, in order to confirm that the simple method for evaluating oil according to the present invention is useful as an evaluation of contaminated soil, the oil content of the contaminated soil was evaluated.
First, the thing (contaminated soil) which mixed light oil with the density | concentration of 10000 mg / kg to 100 g of wash | cleaned soil was produced.
Next, by mixing 0.5 wt%, 1.0 wt%, and 2.0 wt% of activated carbon with the contaminated soil thus prepared, three types of soil were prepared in which light oil adsorption treatment was performed in stages, and activated carbon was used as a blank. Soil (contaminated soil itself) was prepared.
Next, four 50 g of water was prepared in a polystyrene container having an opening diameter of 90 mm and a depth of 15 mm, and 5 g of the above soil was added to each container and lightly stirred.
Next, the oil film of each container was subjected to visual evaluation in four stages, which is a conventional evaluation method. In the visual evaluation, when the oil film level was 2 or more, it was determined that purification measures were necessary. The evaluation criteria at each stage are as follows.
Oil film level 0: Oil film cannot be recognized (no purification measures are required)
Oil film level 1: A white film floats on the surface of the water (no need for purification measures)
Oil film level 2: Seven-color oil film interference fringes on the surface of the water (purification measures are required)
Oil film level 3: Clearly recognizable oil film (purification measures are required)
Next, 100 mg of a 0.3 wt% oil red 2-propanol solution (fat-soluble dye solution) was placed in each container, and oil red was dissolved in light oil.
Next, after standing for 5 minutes, irradiate with halogen light to cause the fat-soluble dye to emit light, take an image of a polystyrene container using a CCD camera, and adjust the amount of light emission using 256 gradations (grayscale). Digitized in 255 steps. The results are shown in FIG. 9 together with the results of visual evaluation.

その結果、目視評価では油膜レベル1(浄化対策の必要なし)と判断された、活性炭を0.5wt%、1.0wt%混合した土壌は、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法では数値が255段階においてそれぞれ72と40という結果となり、明らかに土壌から遊離する油量が異なっていることがわかった。   As a result, the soil in which 0.5 wt% and 1.0 wt% of activated carbon were mixed, which was determined to be oil film level 1 (no need for purification measures) by visual evaluation, had a numerical value of 255 in the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention. The results were 72 and 40, respectively, and it was found that the amount of oil released from the soil was clearly different.

また、目視評価では油膜レベル0と判定された活性炭を2.0wt%混合した土壌は、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法では数値が255段階において37となり、目視評価では油膜レベル2(浄化対策が必要)と判定された、活性炭を混合しないブランクの土壌は、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法では数値が255段階において80となった。
従って、活性炭を0.5wt%、1.0wt%混合した土壌(目視評価において浄化対策の必要なしと判断された土壌)でも、活性炭を1.0wt%混合した土壌については実際には油膜レベル0と同レベルの土壌であることがわかった。
一方、活性炭を0.5wt%混合した土壌については油膜レベル2と同レベルの土壌であり、実は浄化対策が必要な土壌であることが明らかになった。
このことから、本発明に係る油の簡易評価方法は、従来の目視や臭気による評価では見落とされる可能性があった汚染度合を詳細な分析をすることなく簡単に且つ正確に評価することができることがわかった。
また、浄化処理後の確認作業(評価)を簡便かつ客観的に行うことが可能であることがわかった。
In addition, the soil mixed with 2.0 wt% of activated carbon determined to have an oil film level of 0 by visual evaluation has a numerical value of 37 at the 255 level in the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention. The blank soil that was not mixed with activated charcoal was determined to be 80 in the 255th step in the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention.
Therefore, even if the soil is mixed with 0.5 wt% and 1.0 wt% of activated carbon (soil that is judged to require no purification measures in visual evaluation), the oil film level is actually 0 for the soil mixed with 1.0 wt% of activated carbon. It was found to be the same level of soil.
On the other hand, the soil mixed with 0.5 wt% of activated carbon is soil at the same level as oil film level 2, and it has become clear that it is actually a soil that requires remedial measures.
From this, the simple oil evaluation method according to the present invention can easily and accurately evaluate the degree of contamination that may have been overlooked in the conventional visual and odor evaluation without detailed analysis. I understood.
Moreover, it turned out that the confirmation work (evaluation) after a purification process can be performed simply and objectively.

本発明の方法は油(特に汚染土壌の油)の簡易評価に用いることができる。   The method of the present invention can be used for simple evaluation of oil (especially oil in contaminated soil).

1 水
2a 容器
2b 容器
3 水面
4 油分
5 内壁面
6 汚染土壌
7 汚染されていない(浄化対策を必要としない)土壌
1 Water 2a Container 2b Container 3 Water surface 4 Oil 5 Inner wall surface 6 Contaminated soil 7 Uncontaminated soil (no purification measures are required)

Claims (5)

内壁面が撥油性の材料で構成された容器に白色に着色した水を供給する水供給工程と、
前記水供給工程の次工程として、
評価対象物を前記容器に供給する評価対象物供給工程と、
水面に存在する油膜に脂溶性色素溶液を混合する脂溶性色素溶液混合工程と、
前記脂溶性色素溶液混合工程の後に、前記水面に紫外線または赤外線を照射する照射工程を有し、
油膜の発光度合から油の有無または/および油量の多少を評価することを特徴とする油の簡易評価方法。
A water supply step for supplying white colored water to a container having an inner wall made of an oil repellent material;
As the next step of the water supply step,
An evaluation object supply step of supplying the evaluation object to the container;
A fat-soluble dye solution mixing step of mixing a fat-soluble dye solution with an oil film present on the water surface;
After the fat-soluble dye solution mixing step, an irradiation step of irradiating the water surface with ultraviolet rays or infrared rays,
A simple method for evaluating oil, characterized by evaluating the presence or absence of oil and / or the amount of oil based on the luminous intensity of an oil film.
前記評価対象物供給工程が、
油汚染された土壌を前記容器に混合する土壌混合工程であることを特徴とする請求項に記載の油の簡易評価方法。
The evaluation object supply step includes
2. The simple oil evaluation method according to claim 1 , which is a soil mixing step of mixing oil-contaminated soil into the container.
前記脂溶性色素溶液が、
クルクミン溶液またはオイルレッド溶液であることを特徴とする請求項1または請求項2に記載の油の簡易評価方法。
The fat-soluble dye solution is
Simple evaluation method of oil according to claim 1 or claim 2, characterized in that the curcumin solution or oil red solution.
前記照射工程の際に生じる前記脂溶性色素溶液の発光度合を数値化する数値化工程と、
前記数値化工程によって数値化した値から油の有無または/および油量の多少を評価する評価工程を有することを特徴とする請求項1から請求項のいずれか一項に記載の油の簡易評価方法。
A quantification step for quantifying the degree of luminescence of the fat-soluble dye solution produced during the irradiation step;
The simple oil according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , further comprising an evaluation step of evaluating the presence or absence of oil and / or the amount of oil from the value digitized by the digitization step. Evaluation method.
前記数値化工程が、
前記油膜の発光度合を256階調に変換するものであることを特徴とする請求項に記載の油の簡易評価方法。
The quantification step is
The simple evaluation method for oil according to claim 4 , wherein the light emission degree of the oil film is converted into 256 gradations.
JP2015026078A 2015-02-13 2015-02-13 Simple evaluation method for oil Active JP6153552B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015026078A JP6153552B2 (en) 2015-02-13 2015-02-13 Simple evaluation method for oil

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015026078A JP6153552B2 (en) 2015-02-13 2015-02-13 Simple evaluation method for oil

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2016148605A JP2016148605A (en) 2016-08-18
JP6153552B2 true JP6153552B2 (en) 2017-06-28

Family

ID=56688325

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2015026078A Active JP6153552B2 (en) 2015-02-13 2015-02-13 Simple evaluation method for oil

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6153552B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS4862486A (en) * 1971-12-03 1973-08-31
JPS5246893A (en) * 1975-10-13 1977-04-14 Agency Of Ind Science & Technol Method of measuring free oil content in oil-contained sludge and appar atus for same
JPS54118885A (en) * 1978-03-08 1979-09-14 Asia Oil Co Ltd Outflow oil detector
JPS63265142A (en) * 1986-12-04 1988-11-01 Ricoh Co Ltd Physical property measuring apparatus of liquid
ES2310010T3 (en) * 1997-11-07 2008-12-16 Medion Research Laboratories Inc. VISCOSE COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING CARBON DIOXIDE.
US6074549A (en) * 1998-02-20 2000-06-13 Canadian Environmental Equipment & Engineering Technologies, Inc. Jet pump treatment of heavy oil production sand
US6016191A (en) * 1998-05-07 2000-01-18 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus and tool using tracers and singles point optical probes for measuring characteristics of fluid flow in a hydrocarbon well and methods of processing resulting signals
WO2001098757A1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2001-12-27 Imbibitive Technologies Corp. Visual spill indicator
JP2003344289A (en) * 2002-05-27 2003-12-03 Ael:Kk Easy oil detecting method
JP4654894B2 (en) * 2005-11-28 2011-03-23 岩崎電気株式会社 Oil film detection apparatus and method
EP2076129B1 (en) * 2006-10-12 2016-05-04 Research Foundation Of The City University Of New York Novel curcumin dimer
WO2008078752A1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2008-07-03 Nisshin Seifun Group Inc. Method of forming tissue structure image of processed food or raw material for producing the same
US7728291B2 (en) * 2008-01-29 2010-06-01 Eic Laboratories, Inc. Detection of heavy oil using fluorescence polarization
CN102449468B (en) * 2009-03-26 2014-02-26 独立行政法人物质·材料研究机构 Sensor for detecting material to be tested
JP2012098272A (en) * 2010-08-23 2012-05-24 Nsk Ltd Target concentration measuring device and target concentration measuring method
US9080987B2 (en) * 2011-05-26 2015-07-14 Altria Client Services, Inc. Oil soluble taggants
WO2013128614A1 (en) * 2012-03-01 2013-09-06 日本精工株式会社 Target-material detection device and target-material detection method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2016148605A (en) 2016-08-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
McDonough et al. Measuring total PFASs in water: The tradeoff between selectivity and inclusivity
Pullin et al. Rank analysis of the pH-dependent synchronous fluorescence spectra of six standard humic substances
Tatti et al. Contaminant back-diffusion from low-permeability layers as affected by groundwater velocity: A laboratory investigation by box model and image analysis
Hua et al. Optical properties of algogenic organic matter within the growth period of Chlorella sp. and predicting their disinfection by-product formation
Choodum et al. Rapid quantitative colourimetric tests for trinitrotoluene (TNT) in soil
JP4355832B2 (en) Comet assay analysis method, comet assay image analysis apparatus, and comet assay analysis apparatus
WO2009102900A2 (en) Method and apparatus for fluorogenic determination of lead concentration
JP6153552B2 (en) Simple evaluation method for oil
Logemann et al. Using the HPTLC-bioluminescence bacteria assay for the determination of acute toxicities in marine sediments and its eligibility as a monitoring assessment tool
JP2009036689A (en) METHOD FOR EASY ANALYSIS OF TRACE AMOUNT OF Se IN ENVIRONMENTAL WATER
DE102013213369B3 (en) Non-destructive testing of workpiece surfaces
Lee et al. UV-epifluorescence microscopy analysis of sediments recovered from the Kalamazoo River
JP6634065B2 (en) Water-based fluorescent penetrant for penetration testing
US3929664A (en) Water-washable inspection penetrant employing triglycerides and polyglycerides of fatty acids
Chiang What Total Oxidizable Precursor Assay Can and Cannot Tell Us about Precursors of Perfluoroalkyl Acids
Aeby Quantitative fluorescence imaging of tracer distributions in soil profiles
CN105092547B (en) Biased sample fluorescence analysis method based on collection of illustrative plates form
DE102004052764B3 (en) Non-destructive in-line testing of the reactivity of a photocatalytic surface coating on e.g. a roof tile operates under UV irradiation by applying a test substance
Ghervase et al. Laser induced fluorescence efficiency in water quality assessment
CN104677867B (en) A kind of method that fluorescent material concentration in penetrant inspection waste water is determined indirectly with measure COD
JP2020003449A (en) Quick-drying developer for liquid penetrant test and liquid penetrant test using the same
WO2004090156A3 (en) Test system for detecting contaminants
JP3030523B2 (en) Penetration testing method and washing water used in the method
TWI824544B (en) An in-situ chlorinated compound investigation method by dye fluorescence technology
Literathy et al. Pollution potential of oil-contaminated soil on groundwater resources in Kuwait

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20170222

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20170228

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20170421

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20170516

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20170530

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6153552

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250