JP5442066B2 - Plan management apparatus, plan management method, and plan management program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to, for example, a plan management apparatus, a plan management method, and a plan management program for managing an energy saving plan.

  Conventionally, various systems have been proposed to support energy saving plans (see, for example, Patent Documents 1-4).

  Since the degree of difficulty in executing energy conservation varies from place to place, energy conservation goal setting and result evaluation should be judged in consideration of the degree of difficulty. By considering the degree of difficulty, it is possible to set appropriate targets and make fair and legitimate evaluations, and to promote energy conservation. However, this difficulty level is not considered in the conventional system.

JP 2010-026836 A JP 2011-048779 A JP 2011-086106 A JP 2012-003398 A

  An object of the present invention is to make it possible to evaluate a result of energy saving in consideration of, for example, a difficulty level for executing energy saving.

The plan management apparatus of the present invention
A planning difficulty level storage unit that stores a planning difficulty level set in advance as representing the difficulty level of executing a specific plan;
A plan actual value storage unit that stores a plan actual value acquired in advance as a value representing a result of executing the specific plan;
An evaluation value calculation unit that calculates a result evaluation value representing an evaluation related to the result based on the planning difficulty stored in the planning difficulty storage unit and the planned actual value stored in the planned actual value storage unit;
An evaluation value output unit that outputs a result evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit.

  According to the present invention, for example, the result of energy saving can be evaluated in consideration of the difficulty level of executing the energy saving plan.

The function block diagram of the energy-saving plan assistance apparatus 100 in Embodiment 1. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an energy saving plan support method of the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 according to the first embodiment. The flowchart of the energy-saving difficulty level setting process (S110) in Embodiment 1. FIG. FIG. 6 shows an energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210 in the first embodiment. The flowchart of the energy-saving target setting process (S120) in Embodiment 1. FIG. FIG. 6 shows an energy saving target setting screen 220 in the first embodiment. FIG. 6 shows a standard reduction rate table 193 in the first embodiment. The figure which shows the energy-saving performance table 194 in Embodiment 1. FIG. The figure which shows the energy-saving target setting table 192 in Embodiment 1. FIG. FIG. 6 shows an energy saving evaluation screen 240 in the first embodiment. The figure which shows the energy-saving evaluation table 195 in Embodiment 1. FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a method for calculating an energy saving evaluation value in the first embodiment. FIG. 6 shows a difficulty coefficient table 196 in the first embodiment. FIG. 11 shows another example of the energy saving evaluation screen 240 in the first embodiment. The figure which shows an example of the hardware resource of the energy-saving plan assistance apparatus 100 in Embodiment 1. FIG.

Embodiment 1 FIG.
A mode for supporting a plan of energy saving (hereinafter referred to as “energy saving”) for saving (reducing) energy consumption will be described.
However, “energy saving” is an example of a case / purpose, and the first embodiment may be used to support a plan for a case / purpose other than energy saving.

FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram of an energy saving plan support apparatus 100 according to the first embodiment.
The functional configuration of the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 according to Embodiment 1 will be described with reference to FIG.

The energy saving plan support apparatus 100 (an example of a plan management apparatus) includes an energy saving difficulty setting unit 110, an energy saving target setting unit 120, an energy saving result registration unit 130, an energy saving evaluation unit 140, and a support device storage unit 190.
Below, the outline | summary of the function structure of the energy-saving plan assistance apparatus 100 is demonstrated. Details of each functional configuration will be described separately.

The energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 (an example of a planning difficulty level calculating unit) sets a difficulty level for executing an energy saving plan (hereinafter referred to as “energy saving difficulty level”).
The energy saving target setting unit 120 (an example of a comparison target value acquisition unit, a target setting screen display unit, and a standard target value acquisition unit) sets an energy saving target value in consideration of the degree of energy saving difficulty.
The energy saving result registration unit 130 registers the result of executing the energy saving plan (hereinafter referred to as “energy saving result value”).
The energy saving evaluation unit 140 (an example of an evaluation value calculation unit and an evaluation value output unit) is an evaluation value related to the execution result of the energy saving plan (hereinafter referred to as “energy saving evaluation value”) based on the energy saving actual value, the energy saving target value, and the energy saving difficulty level. ) Is calculated.

The support device storage unit 190 stores data used by the energy saving plan support device 100.
For example, the support device storage unit 190 includes an energy saving difficulty level setting table 191 (an example of a planning difficulty level storage unit), an energy saving target setting table 192 (an example of a target value information storage unit), and a standard reduction rate table 193 (a standard target value storage). Part example).
Furthermore, the support device storage unit 190 stores an energy saving result table 194 (an example of a planned result value storage unit), an energy saving evaluation table 195, and a difficulty level coefficient table 196.
The contents of each table will be described separately.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an energy saving plan support method of the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 according to the first embodiment.
The energy-saving plan support method of the energy-saving plan support apparatus 100 in Embodiment 1 is demonstrated based on FIG.

In S110, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 sets the energy saving difficulty level.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the energy saving difficulty level setting process (S110) in the first embodiment.
The energy-saving difficulty level setting process (S110) in Embodiment 1 is demonstrated based on FIG.

  In S111, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 displays an energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210 as shown in FIG.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210 in the first embodiment.
The energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210 includes a table associating “area name”, “lighting”, “air conditioning”, “outlet / power”, “overall influence”, and “energy saving difficulty level”.
“Area name” is a display field for displaying an area name for identifying an area (location) where the energy saving plan is executed. The area name may be input by the administrator or may be stored in advance in the support device storage unit 190.
“Lighting” is an input field for inputting a service influence level (difficulty of energy saving) due to power saving of lighting. The service impact level is, for example, the impact level on the service to customers.
“Air conditioning” is an input field for inputting a service influence level due to power saving of air conditioning.
“Outlet / Power” is an input field for inputting a service influence level due to power saving of the outlet or power.
The “total impact level” is a display field for displaying the total impact level calculated based on the service impact levels of “lighting”, “air conditioning”, and “outlet / power”.
The “energy saving difficulty level” is a display field for displaying the energy saving difficulty level calculated based on the total influence level.

  Lighting, air conditioning, an outlet, or power is an example of a facility (electric device) that saves power for energy saving. Hereinafter, these facilities are referred to as “energy saving items”.

Returning to FIG. 3, the description of the energy saving difficulty level setting process (S110) will be continued.
It progresses to S112 after S111.

  In S <b> 112, the administrator inputs the service influence degree of the energy saving item on the energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210 of the energy saving plan support apparatus 100. For example, the administrator operates the input device (keyboard, mouse, etc.) of the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 to input or specify the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 (the same applies hereinafter).

Hereinafter, an example in which the manager inputs the service influence degree of each area in the station building will be described with reference to FIG. It is assumed that there are area A (store), area B (employee room), and area C (passage) in the station building.
Area A is a store in the station building. For this reason, the power saving of lighting and air conditioning in area A has a relatively large service impact on customers (station users). On the other hand, power saving of outlets (removing unused appliance plugs from outlets) has a relatively small service impact on customers. Therefore, the administrator inputs the service influence levels “90%”, “90%”, and “60%” in the “lighting”, “air conditioning”, and “outlet / power” fields of area A.
Area B is an employee room in the station building. For this reason, all of the power savings of lighting, air conditioning and outlets have a relatively small service impact on customers. Therefore, the administrator inputs service influence levels “60%”, “60%”, and “60%” in the “lighting”, “air conditioning”, and “outlet / power” fields of area B.
Area C is a passage (including an escalator) in the station building. The power saving of lighting and air conditioning in the passage where there is not much traffic is considered to have a relatively small service impact on customers. However, since there are escalators that operate by power in the passage, power saving has a relatively large service impact on customers. Therefore, the administrator inputs the service influence levels “60%”, “60%”, and “90%” in the “lighting”, “air conditioning”, and “outlet / power” fields of area C.

  The service influence degree may be a value other than a percentage (for example, a 5-level evaluation value from 1 to 5).

Returning to FIG. 3, the description of the energy saving difficulty level setting process (S110) will be continued.
It progresses to S113 after S112.

In step S <b> 113, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 calculates the total influence level based on the service impact level of the energy saving item input on the energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210.
In FIG. 4, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 calculates the average value “80%” of the service influence levels “90%”, “90%”, and “60%” in the area A as the total influence degree in the area A. Similarly, the energy-saving difficulty level setting unit 110 calculates the total influence degree “60%” of area B and the total influence degree “70%” of area C. The energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 displays the calculated overall impact level in the “total impact level” column of the energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210.
However, the total influence degree may be a value other than the average value of the service influence degree (for example, the total value of the service influence degree).
It progresses to S114 after S113.

In S114, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 determines the energy saving difficulty level based on the total influence level.
For example, information that associates the range of the total influence level with the energy saving difficulty level is stored in the support device storage unit 190 in advance. And the energy-saving difficulty level setting part 110 determines the energy-saving difficulty level matched with the range of the total influence degree including the total influence degree of the said area as an energy-saving difficulty degree of the said area.
In FIG. 4, “total impact ≦ 60%” is associated with the energy saving difficulty “1”, “60% <overall impact ≦ 70%” is associated with the energy saving difficulty “2”, and “70% It is assumed that <total impact level> is associated with energy saving difficulty level “3”. In this case, the energy saving difficulty level of area A (total impact level “80%”) is “3”, the energy saving difficulty level of area B (total impact level “60%”) is “1”, and area C ( The degree of energy saving difficulty of the total influence degree “70%”) is “2”. The energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 displays the energy saving difficulty level of each area in the “energy saving difficulty level” column of the energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210. In FIG. 4, one black star means the energy saving difficulty “1”.
It progresses to S115 after S114.

In S <b> 115, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 stores the energy saving difficulty level in the support device storage unit 190.
For example, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 stores information on the table (energy saving difficulty level setting table 191) displayed on the energy saving difficulty level setting screen 210 (see FIG. 4) in the support device storage unit 190.
By S115, the energy saving difficulty level setting process (S110) ends.

Returning to FIG. 2, the explanation of the energy saving plan support method will be continued.
After the energy saving difficulty level setting process (S110), the process proceeds to S120.

In S120, the energy saving target setting unit 120 sets an energy saving target value in consideration of the degree of energy saving difficulty.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the energy saving target setting process (S120) in the first embodiment.
The energy-saving target setting process (S120) in Embodiment 1 is demonstrated based on FIG.

In S121, the administrator designates a target area (area name) for which an energy saving target value is to be set to the energy saving plan support apparatus 100.
The energy saving target setting unit 120 displays an energy saving target setting screen 220 as shown in FIG. 6 on the display 911 as a screen for setting the energy saving target value of the designated target area.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an energy saving target setting screen 220 in the first embodiment.
The energy saving target setting screen 220 includes the following input (selection) column or display column.
The set year input field 221 is a drop-down list for inputting a set year for setting the energy saving target value.
The reference year ratio selection column 222 is a check box for selecting whether or not to use the reference year ratio in order to set the energy saving target value. When the reference year ratio selection field 222 is unchecked, a reference year input field 225, a reference year ratio input field 226, and a previous year ratio display field 227, which will be described later, are deleted from the screen display.
The energy saving difficulty display column 223 is a display column for displaying the energy saving difficulty level.
The separate area information display column 224 is a display column that displays information on the energy saving target value of another area having the same energy saving difficulty level as the target area.
The reference year input field 225 is a drop-down list for inputting a year to be compared with the set year (hereinafter referred to as “reference year”).
The reference year ratio input field 226 is a text box for inputting a target reduction rate (hereinafter referred to as “target reference year ratio”) with respect to the energy saving performance value (power consumption amount) in the reference year.
The previous year comparison display column 227 is a display column for displaying a target reduction rate (hereinafter referred to as “target previous year comparison”) with respect to the energy saving performance value of the previous year.
The target power amount display field 228 is a display field for displaying the target power amount for the set year. When the check is removed in the reference year ratio selection field 222, the target power amount display field 228 changes to an input field (for example, a text box) for inputting the power consumption amount for the set year.

  The target base year ratio, the target previous year ratio, and the target power amount are examples of energy saving target values.

  The drop-down list, check box, or text box is an example of an input interface, and an input interface other than the above may be used in each input (selection) column.

For example, the energy saving target setting unit 120 sets or displays the following initial values on the energy saving target setting screen 220.
(1) The energy saving target setting unit 120 sets the current year in the set year input field 221 as an initial value of the set year.
(2) The energy saving target setting unit 120 checks the reference year ratio selection column 222.
(3) The energy saving target setting unit 120 acquires the energy saving difficulty level of the target area from the energy saving difficulty level setting table 191 (see FIG. 4), and displays the acquired energy saving difficulty level of the target area in the energy saving difficulty level display field 223. .

(4) The energy saving target setting unit 120 acquires an energy saving target value of another area associated with the same energy saving difficulty level as the target area from the energy saving target setting table 192 described later, and separates the acquired energy saving target value of the other area. The information is displayed in the area information display field 224.
However, the energy saving target setting unit 120 may display information other than the energy saving target value in another area (for example, the average value of the energy saving target values in another area) in the other area information display field 224.
Further, the energy saving target setting unit 120 may display the energy saving target value of another area associated with the energy saving difficulty level close to the energy saving difficulty level of the target area in the different area information display field 224. For example, when the energy saving difficulty level is 5 stages and the energy saving difficulty level of the target area is “3”, the energy saving target setting unit 120 determines that the energy saving difficulty setting level is another area from “2” to “4”. Are displayed in the separate area information display field 224.
In addition, an item for designating whether or not to disclose the energy saving target value may be provided in the energy saving target setting table 192. In this case, the energy saving target setting unit 120 determines another area where the energy saving target value can be disclosed based on the setting value of this item, and separates the energy saving target value (or value related to the energy saving target value) of the other area where the energy saving can be disclosed. The information is displayed in the area information display field 224.

  (5) The energy saving target setting unit 120 sets the previous year in the reference year input field 225 as the initial value of the reference year.

(6) The energy saving target setting unit 120 sets the standard reduction rate “1.0%” associated with the same energy saving difficulty “2” as that of the target area from the standard reduction rate table 193 (see FIG. 7) compared to the previous year target. Get as. Then, the energy saving target setting unit 120 sets the acquired target previous year ratio in the reference year ratio input field 226 and displays it in the previous year ratio display field 227.
FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the standard reduction rate table 193 in the first embodiment.
The standard reduction rate table 193 associates “energy saving difficulty level” with “standard reduction rate”.

(7) The energy saving target setting unit 120 acquires the previous year's power consumption “121 kWh” of the target area from the energy saving performance table 194 (see FIG. 8), and the target previous year ratio “−1. The electric energy “120 kWh (= 121 kWh− (121 kWh × 0.01))” of “0%” is calculated. Then, the energy saving target setting unit 120 displays the calculated electric energy in the target electric energy display field 228 as an initial value of the target electric energy.
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an energy saving performance table 194 in the first embodiment.
The energy saving performance table 194 associates “area name”, “year”, “annual power consumption”, and “monthly power consumption”.

Returning to FIG. 5, the description of the energy saving target setting process (S120) will be continued.
It progresses to S122 after S121.

In S122, the administrator inputs the set year in the set year input field 221 on the energy saving target setting screen 220, inputs the reference year in the reference year input field 225, and compares the target reference year ratio in the reference year ratio input field 226. Enter.
Since another area information display field 224 is provided on the energy saving target setting screen 220, the administrator refers to the energy saving target value of another area where the degree of energy saving difficulty is the same as that of the target area, and calculates the target base year ratio of the target area. Can be determined.
The administrator may remove the check from the reference year ratio selection column 222 and specify the target power amount directly in the target power amount display column 228.
It progresses to S123 after S122.

In S123, the energy saving target setting unit 120 calculates the target previous year ratio and the target power amount based on the reference year input in the reference year input field 225 and the target reference year ratio input in the reference year ratio input field 226. Is calculated. The calculation method will be described later.
The energy saving target setting unit 120 displays the target year-on-year comparison in the previous year comparison display field 227 and the target electric energy in the target electric energy display field 228.

The energy saving target setting unit 120 calculates “target year-on-year comparison” and “target power consumption” as follows.
The energy saving target setting unit 120 acquires the power consumption of the reference year from the energy saving performance table 194, and calculates the power amount of the target reference year relative to the acquired power consumption of the reference year as the “target power amount”. For example, when the power consumption amount in the base year is “100 kWh” and the target base year ratio is “−1.0%”, the target power amount is “99 kWh (= 100 kWh− (100 kWh × 0.01))”. It is.
The energy saving target setting unit 120 acquires the power consumption of the previous year from the energy saving performance table 194, and calculates the ratio of the target power amount to the acquired power consumption of the previous year as “target year-on-year comparison”. For example, when the power consumption amount of the previous year is “100 kWh” and the target power amount is “99 kWh”, the target year-on-year ratio is “−1.0% (= ((99 kWh−100 kWh) / 100 kWh) × 100”. ) ”.
After S123, the process proceeds to S124.

In S <b> 124, the energy saving target setting unit 120 stores the energy saving target values (target reference year ratio, target previous year ratio, and target power amount) of the target area in the support device storage unit 190.
For example, the energy saving target setting unit 120 sets and stores the energy saving target value of the target area in the energy saving target setting table 192 as shown in FIG.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an energy saving target setting table 192 according to the first embodiment.
The energy saving target setting table 192 associates “area name”, “set year”, “reference year”, “target power consumption”, “target reference year ratio”, “target previous year ratio”, and “energy saving difficulty level”.
The energy saving target setting unit 120 adds a record to the energy saving target setting table 192, and the “area name”, “set year”, “base year”, “target power”, “target base year ratio”, “target base year ratio” of the added record. "A corresponding value of the energy saving target setting screen 220 (see FIG. 6) is set in" energy saving difficulty level ".

  In FIG. 5, the energy saving target setting process (S120) is terminated by S124.

Returning to FIG. 2, the explanation of the energy saving plan support method will be continued.
After the energy saving target setting process (S120), the process proceeds to S130.

In S <b> 130, the administrator (or the power management apparatus that manages the power consumption) inputs the monthly power consumption of each area to the energy saving plan support apparatus 100.
The energy saving record registration unit 130 sets and stores the input monthly power consumption of each area in the energy saving record table 194 (see FIG. 8).
The energy saving record registration unit 130 calculates the power consumption amount for the current year by summing the monthly power consumption amounts at the end of the fiscal year, and sets and stores the calculated power consumption amount for the current year in the energy saving record table 194.
However, the administrator (or power management apparatus) inputs the annual power consumption to the energy saving plan support apparatus 100, and the energy saving record registration unit 130 sets and stores this annual power consumption in the energy saving record table 194. Also good.
It progresses to S140 after S130.

In S140, the administrator inputs the target area to be evaluated and the evaluation year to be evaluated to the energy saving plan support apparatus 100.
The energy saving evaluation unit 140 acquires the degree of energy saving difficulty and the target year-to-year ratio of the evaluation year for the target area from the energy saving target setting table 192 (see FIG. 9).
The energy saving evaluation unit 140 acquires the annual power consumption of the evaluation area and the previous year from the energy saving performance table 194 (see FIG. 8) for the target area, and the ratio of the annual power consumption of the evaluation year to the previous year ( (Hereinafter referred to as “results compared to previous year”). The method for calculating the actual year-on-year comparison is the same as the target year-on-year comparison calculation method.
The energy saving evaluation unit 140 calculates the energy saving evaluation value based on the results compared with the previous year (an example of energy saving results), the target compared with the previous year (an example of the energy saving target value), and the energy saving difficulty level, and stores the calculated energy saving evaluation values. And output. A method for calculating the energy saving evaluation value will be described later.

For example, the energy saving evaluation unit 140 displays the calculated energy saving evaluation value on an energy saving evaluation screen 240 as shown in FIG.
For example, the energy saving evaluation unit 140 sets and stores the calculated energy saving evaluation value in the energy saving evaluation table 195 as shown in FIG.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an energy saving evaluation screen 240 in the first embodiment.
The energy saving evaluation screen 240 associates “area name”, “energy saving difficulty level”, “reference year”, “plan value”, “actual value”, “actual evaluation value”, and “planned evaluation value”.
“Plan value” indicates the target year-on-year comparison.
“Actual value” indicates a year-on-year comparison.
“Actual evaluation value” indicates an energy saving evaluation value based on the actual results compared to the previous year and the difficulty level of energy saving.
“Planned evaluation value” indicates an energy saving evaluation value based on the target year-on-year comparison and the actual year-on-year comparison (and energy saving difficulty level).

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an energy saving evaluation table 195 in the first embodiment.
The energy saving evaluation table 195 associates “area name”, “evaluation year”, “energy saving difficulty level”, “result evaluation value”, and “planned evaluation value”.

FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating a method for calculating an energy saving evaluation value in the first embodiment.
The calculation method of the energy-saving evaluation value in Embodiment 1 is demonstrated based on FIG.

Here, the target year-on-year comparison of area A is “−0.8%”, the energy saving difficulty is “3”, and the actual year-on-year comparison is “−0.7%”.
Further, it is assumed that a difficulty level coefficient table 196 as illustrated in FIG. 13 is stored in advance in the support device storage unit 190. The difficulty level coefficient table 196 associates the energy saving difficulty “1” with the weighting coefficient “1.0”, associates the energy saving difficulty “2” with the weighting coefficient “1.25”, and saves the energy saving difficulty “3”. And the weighting coefficient “1.5”.
FIG. 13 is a diagram showing the difficulty level coefficient table 196 in the first embodiment.

The energy saving evaluation unit 140 multiplies the absolute value “0.7”, the constant “100”, and the weighting coefficient “1.5” corresponding to the energy saving difficulty “3” compared with the previous year of the results “105 (= 0). .7 × 100 × 1.5) ”is calculated as the performance evaluation value of area A (see FIG. 12).
The energy saving evaluation unit 140 divides the absolute value “0.7” of the actual result from the previous fiscal year by the absolute value “0.8” of the target previous fiscal year, and multiplied by a constant “100” “87 (= (0. 7 / 0.8) × 100) ”is calculated as the planned evaluation value for area A (see FIG. 12). However, the planned evaluation value when the actual year-on-year ratio is a positive value (when the annual power consumption increases from the previous year) is “0”.
The energy saving evaluation unit 140 may calculate a plan evaluation value using the energy saving difficulty level. For example, the energy saving evaluation unit 140 plans the area A by evaluating a value “131 (= 87 × 1.5)” obtained by multiplying the aforementioned value “87” by the weighting coefficient “1.5” of the energy saving difficulty “3”. It may be calculated as a value.
The calculation method of the energy saving evaluation value (actual evaluation value, planned evaluation value) is the same for the other areas B and C.

  In FIG. 2, the process of the energy saving plan support method ends at S140.

In Embodiment 1, the form which performs target setting and result evaluation of an energy-saving plan in consideration of the energy-saving difficulty level was demonstrated.
For example, the energy saving difficulty level is set high for an area where the comfort level should not be lowered by any means, such as a store. And about an area with a high energy-saving difficulty level, even if a reduction rate (for example, compared with the results last year) is low, an evaluation result is not made low. As a result, it is possible to avoid comparisons between areas based on only absolute reduction rates, increase the motivation of persons in charge in each area, and promote energy saving activities.
The energy saving difficulty level is determined based on area characteristics. For example, the degree of influence on the activity in the area when the operation or operation of the facility that consumes power is changed for energy saving is determined. The greater the impact, the higher the energy saving difficulty.

In the first embodiment, the administrator designates individual service influences such as lighting, air conditioning, outlets and power on the energy saving difficulty setting screen 210 (see FIG. 4), and the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 provides individual service influences. The form which determines the energy-saving difficulty level based on the total influence degree and the total influence degree based on this was demonstrated.
However, the energy saving difficulty level may be determined based on the operation amount of the area (for example, the number of users in the area, the operating time of the electric appliance in the area) calculated using various sensors.

For example, a human sensor (infrared sensor or the like) is installed in the area or at the entrance and exit of the area, and the number of users detected by the human sensor is counted. In addition, for areas such as employee rooms, entrance / exit management devices (an example of a human sensor) are installed at the entrance and exit of the area to authenticate the entrance / exit and lock / unlock the doors. The number of people who enter and leave (users) may be counted.
The energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 determines the energy saving difficulty level according to the counted number of users. For example, a table in which the range of the number of users is associated with the energy saving difficulty level is stored in advance. The greater the number of users, the more difficult it is to save energy, and the higher the degree of difficulty in saving energy. The smaller the number of users, the easier it is to save energy, and the less difficult it is. The energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 acquires the energy saving difficulty level associated with the range including the counted number of users as the energy saving difficulty level of the target area.
The energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 similarly determines the energy saving difficulty level when measuring the operating time of the electrical appliances in the area as the operation amount of the area.

In the first embodiment, the mode in which the annual energy saving target value is set on the energy saving target setting screen 220 (see FIG. 6) has been described.
However, the energy saving target value for each month may be set on the energy saving target setting screen 220.

For example, a selection field (for example, a radio button) for selecting either “annual” or “monthly” on the energy saving target setting screen 220 and an input field (for example, for each month) for inputting a monthly energy saving target value Text box).
The administrator designates “yearly” or “monthly” on the energy saving target setting screen 220. When “annual” is designated, the administrator inputs the base year and the target base year ratio (or target electric energy) as described above (see FIG. 6).
When “month” is designated, the administrator inputs an energy saving target value (for example, target power amount) for each month in the input field for each month. The energy saving target setting unit 120 stores the energy saving target value for each month and the annual energy saving target value (the total value or the average value of the energy saving target values for each month) in the support device storage unit 190.

For example, an interface (for example, a button) for requesting development from an annual energy saving target value to a monthly energy saving target value is provided on the energy saving target setting screen 220.
As described above, the administrator sets the annual energy saving target value on the energy saving target setting screen 220 (see FIG. 6), and requests the development of the energy saving target value through the interface.
(1) The energy saving target setting unit 120 calculates a value obtained by equally dividing the annual energy saving target value (target power amount) as a monthly energy saving target value, and stores and displays the calculated monthly energy saving target value. To do.
(2) However, the energy saving target setting unit 120 acquires the monthly energy saving actual value (power consumption) of the base year (or the previous year) from the energy saving performance table 194 (see FIG. 8), Alternatively, the monthly energy saving target value may be calculated based on the target year-on-year comparison) and the monthly energy saving performance value of the reference year (or the previous year). The method for calculating the monthly energy saving target value is the same as the method for calculating the annual energy saving target value (target electric energy) (see S123 in FIG. 5).
Further, the energy saving target setting unit 120 may determine whether or not the energy saving performance values for all months of the reference year (or previous year) are stored in the energy saving performance table 194. When the energy saving performance values for all months are stored, the energy saving target setting unit 120 calculates the energy saving target value for each month according to (2) above. When at least one of the energy saving performance values is not stored, the energy saving target setting unit 120 calculates a monthly energy saving target value according to the above (1).

When the monthly energy saving target value is set, the energy saving evaluation unit 140 may calculate and store the energy saving evaluation value for each month. The method for calculating and storing the monthly energy saving evaluation value is the same as the method for calculating and storing the annual energy saving evaluation value (see S140 in FIG. 2).
In this case, the energy saving evaluation unit 140 displays the annual energy saving evaluation value and the monthly energy saving evaluation value on the energy saving evaluation screen 240 (see FIG. 14).

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing another example of the energy saving evaluation screen 240 in the first embodiment.
The energy saving evaluation screen 240 has a switching tab 241 (an example of an interface) for switching between “yearly” and “monthly”, and the administrator selects either “yearly” or “monthly” with the switching tab 241. . When “annual” is selected, the energy saving evaluation screen 240 displays the energy saving evaluation value for the year (see (1) in FIG. 14). When “monthly” is selected, the energy saving evaluation screen 240 displays the energy saving evaluation value for each month (see (2) in FIG. 14).

  In the present embodiment, the energy saving difficulty level is calculated based on the total influence level, and the standard reduction rate and the weighting coefficient are determined according to the energy saving difficulty level. As a modification, in S114 described with reference to FIG. 3, the energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110 may set the total influence level as the energy saving difficulty level as it is. At this time, each energy saving difficulty level of the standard reduction rate table 193 shown in FIG. 7 is a numerical value (range of energy saving difficulty level) having a certain width. Similarly, each energy saving difficulty level in the difficulty level coefficient table 196 shown in FIG. 13 is also a numerical value (range of energy saving difficulty level) having a certain width.

FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of hardware resources of the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 according to the first embodiment.
In FIG. 15, the energy saving plan support apparatus 100 (an example of a computer) includes a CPU 901 (Central Processing Unit). The CPU 901 is connected to hardware devices such as a ROM 903, a RAM 904, a communication board 905 (communication device), a display 911 (display device), a keyboard 912, a mouse 913, a drive 914, and a magnetic disk device 920 via a bus 902. Control hardware devices. The drive 914 is a device that reads and writes a storage medium such as an FD (Flexible Disk Drive), a CD (Compact Disc), and a DVD (Digital Versatile Disc).
The ROM 903, the RAM 904, the magnetic disk device 920, and the drive 914 are examples of storage devices. A keyboard 912, a mouse 913, and a communication board 905 are examples of input devices. The display 911 and the communication board 905 are examples of output devices.

  The communication board 905 is wired or wirelessly connected to a communication network such as a LAN (Local Area Network), the Internet, or a telephone line.

  The magnetic disk device 920 stores an OS 921 (operating system), a program group 922, and a file group 923.

  The program group 922 includes programs that execute the functions described as “units” in the embodiments. A program (for example, a plan management program) is read and executed by the CPU 901. That is, the program causes the computer to function as “to part”, and causes the computer to execute the procedures and methods of “to part”.

  The file group 923 includes various data (input, output, determination result, calculation result, processing result, etc.) used in “˜part” described in the embodiment.

In the embodiment, arrows included in the configuration diagrams and flowcharts mainly indicate input and output of data and signals.
The processing of the embodiment described based on the flowchart and the like is executed using hardware such as the CPU 901, a storage device, an input device, and an output device.

  In the embodiment, what is described as “to part” may be “to circuit”, “to apparatus”, and “to device”, and “to step”, “to procedure”, and “to processing”. May be. That is, what is described as “to part” may be implemented by any of firmware, software, hardware, or a combination thereof.

  In the first embodiment, for example, the following plan management apparatus (energy saving plan support apparatus 100) has been described. Terms used in Embodiment 1 are described in parentheses.

The plan management apparatus includes a planning difficulty level storage unit (energy saving difficulty level setting table 191), a plan result value storage unit (energy saving result table 194), an evaluation value calculation unit (energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110), and an evaluation value output. (Energy saving evaluation unit 140).
The planning difficulty level storage unit is a storage unit that stores a planning difficulty level (energy saving difficulty level) set in advance as representing the difficulty level of executing a specific plan.
The planned actual value storage unit is a storage unit that stores a planned actual value (energy saving actual value) acquired in advance as a value representing a result of executing the specific plan.
The evaluation value calculation unit is a result evaluation value (actual evaluation value) representing an evaluation related to the result based on the planning difficulty stored in the planning difficulty storage unit and the planned actual value stored in the planned actual value storage unit. ) Is calculated.
The evaluation value output unit outputs the result evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit.

The plan management apparatus further includes a planning difficulty level calculation unit (energy saving difficulty level setting unit 110).
The planning difficulty calculation unit displays an item difficulty input screen (energy saving difficulty setting screen 210) for inputting an item difficulty indicating the difficulty of executing the plan item for each plan item included in the specific plan. To do. The planning difficulty calculation unit calculates the planning difficulty based on the item difficulty of each planning item input on the item difficulty input screen, and stores the calculated planning difficulty in the planning difficulty storage unit.

The planning difficulty level storage unit is a storage unit that stores, as the planning difficulty level, a planning difficulty level (energy saving difficulty level of the target area) for executing the specific plan at a specific execution location.
The plan management apparatus further includes a target value information storage unit (energy saving target setting table 192), a comparison target value acquisition unit (energy saving target setting unit 120), and a target setting screen display unit (energy saving target setting unit 120). Prepare.
The target value information storage unit is configured to execute the specific plan at another execution location other than the specific execution location (an energy saving difficulty level in another area) and a planned target value related to the specific plan (in another area The energy storage target value) is stored in association with each other.
The comparison target value acquisition unit acquires a specific planned target value as a comparison target value from the target value information storage unit based on the planning difficulty level stored in the planning difficulty level storage unit.
The target setting screen display unit serves as a target setting screen (energy saving target setting screen 220) for setting the planned target value of the specific execution location, as to information regarding the comparison target value acquired by the comparative target value acquisition unit (separately A screen including the area information display field 224) is displayed.

The plan management apparatus further includes a standard target value storage unit (standard reduction rate table 193) and a standard target value acquisition unit (energy saving target setting unit 120).
The standard target value storage unit is a storage unit that stores a degree of difficulty of planning and a standard target value (standard reduction rate) preset as a standard planned target value in association with each other.
The standard target value acquisition unit acquires a specific standard target value from the standard target value storage unit based on the planning difficulty level stored in the planning difficulty level storage unit.
The target setting screen display unit includes the specific standard target value acquired by the standard target value acquisition unit as an initial value (reference year ratio input field 226) of the planned target value of the specific execution location, and sets the target Display the screen.

The evaluation value calculation unit calculates a first result evaluation value (actual evaluation value) as the result evaluation value, and is stored in the planned target value and the planned actual value storage unit set on the target setting screen. A second result evaluation value (plan evaluation value) is calculated using the plan actual value.
The evaluation value output unit outputs the first result evaluation value and the second result evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit.

  The planning difficulty calculation unit calculates a planning difficulty based on an operation amount measured by a sensor for measuring a specific operation amount at an execution place where the specific plan is executed, and calculates the calculated planning difficulty Store in the planning difficulty storage unit.

  The sensor is a human sensor for measuring the number of users at the execution place as the specific operation amount.

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Energy saving plan support apparatus, 110 Energy saving difficulty setting part, 120 Energy saving target setting part, 130 Energy saving performance registration part, 140 Energy saving evaluation part, 190 Support apparatus memory | storage part, 191 Energy saving difficulty setting table, 192 Energy saving target setting table, 193 Standard reduction rate table, 194 Energy saving performance table, 195 Energy saving evaluation table, 196 Difficulty factor table, 210 Energy saving difficulty setting screen, 220 Energy saving target setting screen, 221 Setting year entry field, 222 Base year ratio selection field, 223 Difficult energy saving Degree display field, 224 separate area information display field, 225 base year input field, 226 base year ratio input field, 227 previous year ratio display field, 228 target power amount display field, 240 energy saving evaluation screen, 241 switching tab, 901 CPU, 902 bus, 903 RO , 904 RAM, 905 communication board, 911 a display, 912 a keyboard, 913 mouse, 914 drive, 920 a magnetic disk device, 921 OS, 922 programs, 923 files.

Claims (9)

A planning difficulty level storage unit for storing a planning difficulty level indicating a difficulty level of executing a specific plan that is an energy saving plan for saving energy at a specific execution location ;
A target value information storage unit for storing the degree of difficulty of executing the specific plan at another execution location other than the specific execution location and the plan target value related to the specific plan in association with each other;
A comparison target value acquisition unit that acquires a specific planned target value as a comparison target value from the target value information storage unit based on the planning difficulty level stored in the planning difficulty level storage unit;
A target setting screen for setting a plan target value for the specific execution place, a target setting screen display unit for displaying a screen including information on the comparison target value acquired by the comparison target value acquisition unit; A featured plan management device. The plan management device further includes:
A standard target value storage unit for storing the degree of difficulty of planning and a standard target value set in advance as a standard planned target value;
A standard target value acquisition unit that acquires a specific standard target value from the standard target value storage unit based on the planning difficulty level stored in the planning difficulty level storage unit,
The target setting screen display unit includes the specific standard target value acquired by the standard target value acquisition unit as an initial value of the planned target value of the specific execution location, and displays the target setting screen. The plan management apparatus according to claim 1 . And Plan Actual value storage section for storing previously acquired planned actual value as a value representing the result of executing the previous SL specific plan,
An evaluation value calculation unit that calculates a result evaluation value representing an evaluation related to the result based on the planning difficulty stored in the planning difficulty storage unit and the planned actual value stored in the planned actual value storage unit;
The plan management apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: an evaluation value output unit that outputs a result evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit. The plan management device further includes:
Displaying the item difficulty input screen for inputting the item difficulty indicating the difficulty of executing the plan item for each plan item included in the specific plan, and each plan item input on the item difficulty input screen The plan management apparatus according to claim 3 , further comprising a planning difficulty level calculation unit that calculates a planning difficulty level based on the item difficulty level and stores the calculated planning difficulty level in the planning difficulty level storage unit. The evaluation value calculation unit calculates a first result evaluation value as the result evaluation value, and calculates the planned target value set on the target setting screen and the planned actual value stored in the planned actual value storage unit. To calculate the second result evaluation value,
5. The plan management apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the evaluation value output unit outputs the first result evaluation value and the second result evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation unit. . The plan management device further includes:
The specific operation of a particular execution location based on the operating amount measured by a sensor for measuring and calculating a plan difficulty, the calculated planned difficulty difficult plan stored in the plan difficulty storage unit The plan management apparatus according to claim 3, further comprising a degree calculation unit.   The plan management apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the sensor is a human sensor for measuring the number of users at the execution place as the specific operation amount. In a plan management method using a plan management apparatus comprising a planning difficulty level storage unit, a target value information storage unit, a comparison target value acquisition unit, and a target setting screen display unit,
The planning difficulty storage unit is a storage unit that stores a planning difficulty level representing a difficulty level of executing a specific plan that is an energy-saving plan that saves energy at a specific execution location ;
The target value information storage unit associates and stores the degree of difficulty of planning for each execution location other than the specific execution location among the execution locations for executing the specific plan and the planned target value related to the specific plan. Storage unit
The comparison target value acquisition unit acquires, as a comparison target value, a planned target value corresponding to the planning difficulty stored in the planning difficulty storage unit among the planned target values stored in the target value information storage unit,
The target setting screen display unit displays a screen including information on the comparison target value acquired by the comparison target value acquisition unit as a target setting screen for setting the planned target value of the specific execution place. A featured plan management method. A plan management program for causing a computer including a difficulty level storage unit and a target value information storage unit to execute comparison target value acquisition processing and target setting screen display processing,
The planning difficulty storage unit is a storage unit that stores a planning difficulty level representing a difficulty level of executing a specific plan that is an energy-saving plan that saves energy at a specific execution location;
The target value information storage unit associates and stores the degree of difficulty of planning for each execution location other than the specific execution location among the execution locations for executing the specific plan and the planned target value related to the specific plan. Storage unit
The comparison target value acquisition process is a process of acquiring, as a comparison target value, a planned target value corresponding to the planning difficulty level stored in the planning difficulty level storage unit among the planned target values stored in the target value information storage unit. And
The target setting screen display process is a process of displaying a screen including information on the comparison target value acquired by the comparison target value acquisition process as a target setting screen for setting the planned target value of the specific execution place. is there
A plan management program characterized by that.

Images