JP5231317B2 - Learning power enhancement system - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a learning power enhancement system, and more particularly to a technique for training the ability to manipulate a language that is the basis of learning power.

  Conventionally, in the field of education (mainly school education at junior high school), multiple subjects (for example, national language, mathematics, science, society, English) are regularly tested for learners, and the results are the results. The student's academic ability is evaluated based on the correct answer rate calculated from the score.

  Further, in recent years, it is efficient by statistically processing the test results for each of the plurality of subjects using an information processing apparatus such as a computer called CAI (Computer-Aided (Assisted) -Instruction). Learning systems that can provide learning plans to learners are well known.

  Furthermore, using the information processing apparatus such as the computer and the Internet, the test results are not only statistically processed using the Internet technology called WBT (Web-Based-Training), A learning system that provides learning materials according to each learner is also known.

  And as a usage form of the learning system using the above-mentioned CAI or WBT, for example, a test is performed via the Internet, and the correct answer rate (correct answer rate) of the test result and the degree of understanding for each subject are analyzed, A learning system that improves a learner's academic ability by providing a problem corresponding to the problem is disclosed (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

JP 2004-117947 A

  By the way, in order to improve learners' academic ability by participating in classes at schools (including cram schools), answering exam questions, and doing self-study such as home study, In other words, it is indispensable to develop a foundational power in the course where academic ability is accumulated, that is, the ability to manipulate language.

  Here, “the ability to manipulate the language” (hereinafter referred to as “language manipulation skill”) means, for example, the ability to understand the meaning and convey the will and information by listening to, speaking, reading and writing the language. Of course, the ability to accurately understand sentences, the ability to uncover concepts that are key points in sentences, the meaning to accurately understand the meaning, and the combination of things conditioned by multiple sentences form an image accurately It is power to do. That is, it can be said that the language operation skill is a learning power (hereinafter referred to as “learning power”) that is commonly required for a plurality of subjects.

  For this reason, learners with extremely low language skills are able to use the language skills as the basis of their ability to learn, even if they participate in classes, solve exam questions, or do self-learning at home. However, it is difficult to understand the lessons, answer questions properly, and fail to establish the results of self-study. There wasn't. That is, in order to improve the learner's academic ability, it is first necessary to improve the language operation skill.

  However, as in the learning system such as Patent Document 1 described above, it is only necessary to analyze the correct answer rate (correct answer rate) of the test results and the degree of understanding for each subject, and provide learning materials corresponding to the language operation. Since the improvement of the skill cannot be achieved, especially for a learner having an extremely low level of language operation skill, it does not lead to the fundamental improvement of the learner's academic ability.

  In addition, since the conventional learning system described above only provides learning materials according to the accuracy rate and understanding level of the test results of a single subject, it is not possible to improve scholastic ability in common to a plurality of subjects.

  However, as described above, language manipulation skills are necessary for learning that is common to a plurality of subjects. Therefore, by improving language manipulation skills, the learner's academic ability in a plurality of subjects is improved. The effect can also be expected.

  The present invention focuses on the above-mentioned language operation skill that is the foundation of the ability to learn, and by improving the level of acquisition, it enhances the learning ability that is common to a plurality of subjects, and is limited to individual subjects. The aim is to improve the academic ability of learners across multiple subjects.

  In order to achieve the above object, the invention according to claim 1 stores a plurality of learner names and a result of a test of a plurality of subjects conducted for the plurality of learners in association with each learner name. Based on the test result storing means, the score extracting means for extracting the score as the test result stored in the test result storing means for each evaluation purpose set for each test, and the score extracted by the score extracting means Language operation, which is the ability to manipulate the language that is the basis of the ability to learn from the academic ability judging means for judging the academic ability of the learner and the score rate of the questions provided for each of the multiple subject examination questions A learning-power-enhancing system comprising language operation skill determination means for determining a skill level.

  Further, the invention according to claim 2 is the learning ability strengthening system according to claim 1, wherein the learning material storage means storing a plurality of learning materials and the level of the language operation skill determined by the language operation skill determination means. And learning material extracting means for extracting learning materials for improving language operation skills from the learning material storage means.

  Further, the invention according to claim 3 is the learning ability enhancement system according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein a basic problem for measuring the level of the language operation skill is required in the test problem of each subject. It is characterized in that it is set with a score of.

  According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the learning ability enhancing system according to the third aspect, the basic problem is set for each of a plurality of evaluation items having different degrees of difficulty in the test questions of each subject. It is characterized by being.

Further, the invention according to claim 5 is the learning ability strengthening system according to claim 4, wherein the language operation skill determining means determines the language operation skill according to the score rate for each of the plurality of evaluation items in the base problem. It is characterized by determining the level.

  Further, the invention according to claim 6 is the learning ability strengthening system according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the academic ability includes at least a deviation value based on the score stored in the test result storage means. The apparatus further includes an evaluation criterion calculating means for calculating the evaluation criterion.

Further, the invention according to claim 7 is the learning power enhancement system according to claim 2 , wherein the learning material storage means stores usage guidance corresponding to the plurality of stored learning materials, respectively. When the learning material is extracted, the learning material extracting means also extracts the usage guidance corresponding to the learning material.

  According to the present invention, the learning ability of a learner having a low level of language operation skill can be particularly efficiently enhanced by improving the language operation skill that is the basis of the learner's ability to learn. Furthermore, it is possible to improve the academic ability of the learner not only in individual subjects but also in a plurality of subjects as a whole.

It is explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of a structure of the learning power reinforcement | strengthening system which concerns on this embodiment. It is explanatory drawing which shows the flow of a process of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is a block diagram of the same learning power reinforcement system. It is a flowchart explaining the process of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is a flowchart explaining the process of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is a flowchart explaining the process of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is a determination table of the acquisition level of the language operation skill of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is a decision table of the provision pattern of the learning material based on the language operation skill of the learning power enhancement system. It is the determination table of the learning material provided according to the pattern based on the language operation skill of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is the determination table of the learning material provided according to the pattern based on the deviation value of the same learning ability reinforcement system. It is a figure explaining the diagnostic content of the language operation skill of the same learning ability reinforcement system.

  Hereinafter, an example of the learning power enhancement system according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. In the present embodiment, a case where the learning power enhancement system is operated for a learner at a junior high school level will be described.

[1. Outline of Learning Strength Enhancement System]
(Outline configuration)
First, an outline of the learning ability enhancement system in the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing an outline of the configuration of the learning ability enhancing system according to the present embodiment, and FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing an outline of the main processing flow executed in the learning ability enhancing system.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the learning power enhancement system 1 according to the present embodiment is roughly configured to include a control device 2 and a storage device 3. For example, a CPU such as a computer or a server constituting a network is used. An information processing apparatus including a hard disk, a flash memory, or the like can be applied.

  As shown in the figure, the control device 2 functions as a test result input means, a score extraction means, a scholastic ability determination means, a language operation skill determination means, an evaluation criterion calculation means, and a learning teaching material extraction means. It functions as test result storage means and learning material storage means.

  In other words, the learning power enhancement system according to the present embodiment stores a plurality of learner names and a test result of a plurality of subjects performed for the plurality of learners in association with each learner name. Learner based on the score, the score extraction means for extracting the score as the test result stored in the test result storage means for each evaluation purpose set for each test, and the score extracted by the score extraction means The level of language operation skill, which is the ability to manipulate the language that is the basis of the learning ability, from the ability determination means for determining the ability of the student and the score rate of the questions provided for each of the multiple subject test questions Language operation skill determining means for determining, learning material storage means for storing a plurality of learning materials, and language operation according to the level of the language operation skill determined by the language operation skill determination means It has become a learning material extraction means for extracting the learning materials to improve the amount from the learning material storage means, and further comprising configure.

  Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the learning ability enhancing system further includes an evaluation criterion calculating means for calculating a scholastic ability evaluation criterion including at least a deviation value based on the score stored in the test result storing means in addition to the above means. And a test result input means for inputting the test result.

(Process flow)
As shown in FIG. 2, in the learning power enhancement system 1, first, academic ability is measured for a learner (step S <b> 101). In this academic ability measurement, a test is performed for each of a plurality of subjects (for example, Japanese language, mathematics, science, society, and English).

  In the present embodiment, the level of the language operation skill of the learner (hereinafter, also referred to as “acquisition level”) is preliminarily included in the test questions for each of the plurality of subjects conducted for the measurement of academic ability (step S101). ) Is measured for each of a plurality of evaluation items (for example, five items) each having a different difficulty level.

  That is, the basic problem in this embodiment is not set only for a single subject but is set across a plurality of subjects. In other words, a basic problem for each of a plurality of evaluation items each having a different difficulty level is set in advance to a plurality of subject examination questions in a required score.

  Although details will be described later, in the present embodiment, the learning level of the learner's language operation skill is determined corresponding to the scoring rate for each of a plurality of evaluation items (for example, 5 items), and the acquired learning level is determined. By extracting and providing a dedicated learning material for the purpose of improving the language operation skill according to the situation, it is possible to improve the language operation skill of the learner.

  Next, the learning power enhancement system 1 executes input of test results (step S102). The input of the test result executed here is performed by the test result input means of the control device 2, and the result of the achievement measurement in step S101 described above, that is, the input of the test result for each of a plurality of subjects is executed. Will be. The test results input here are stored in the test result storage means (storage device 3) for each of a plurality of learners, that is, associated with each learner name.

  As an input method of the test result, for example, when the test executed in the measurement of the academic ability in step S101 is executed in the written test or the like, the test result provided in the learning ability enhancing system 1 is used as the answer of the written test. Using an input device (for example, a keyboard, a scanner (see FIG. 3), etc.) as input means, it can be stored in the test result storage means in association with each learner name.

  Furthermore, as another method for inputting the above test results, for example, each learner has a learner terminal such as an individual personal computer (hereinafter also referred to as a “personal computer”). For the test questions that are connected to each learner's terminal from the learning power enhancement system, the learner can connect with an external network) and input devices (for example, test result input means attached to each learner's terminal) Using a mouse, keyboard, handwriting pad, etc.), enter an answer to the test question, and at the end of the test, configure a system that returns the answer entered at each learner's terminal to the learning power enhancement system 1, The returned answer can be associated with each learner name and stored in the test result storage means.

  Subsequently, the control device 2 of the learning power enhancement system 1 functions as a score extraction unit and executes a score extraction process (step S103). The score extraction process executed here calculates the score by scoring the test result stored in the test result storage means in association with each learner's name, and scores for each evaluation purpose set for each of a plurality of subjects To extract. At this time, although the scoring can be performed mechanically, for example, in the measurement result input process in step S102, the result of the scoring user inputting the scoring result can also be used.

  Next, the control device 2 of the learning ability enhancing system 1 functions as academic ability determination means and executes academic ability determination processing (step S104). The academic ability determination process executed here determines the academic ability of the learner according to the score for each evaluation purpose set for each of the plurality of subjects of each learner extracted in the score extraction process of step S103. . Here, the evaluation purpose set for each of the plurality of subjects is one in which, for example, an evaluation purpose effective for determination of the learner's achievement is set, such as an achievement level for each of the plurality of subjects by viewpoint. .

  Further, the control device 2 of the learning ability enhancing system 1 functions as a language operation skill determination unit and executes a language operation skill determination process (step S105). The language manipulation skill determination process executed here is performed across a plurality of subjects as described above from the scores for each subject of each learner scored in the score extraction process in step S103. For each of the evaluation items with different levels of difficulty, the score of the basic question set in advance (ie, the correct answer rate of the basic question) is extracted with the required points, and the acquisition level of the language operation skill for each learner according to the score Judgment is made.

  Here, the learning level of the language operation skill, as will be described in detail later, is determined in a predetermined stage (for example, three stages) for each learner by a plurality of items (for example, five items). . And according to the learning level of the language operation skill determined here, a dedicated learning material for improving the learning level of the language operation skill is provided to the learner.

  Next, the control device 2 of the learning ability enhancing system 1 functions as an evaluation criterion calculation unit and executes an evaluation criterion calculation process (step S106). The evaluation criterion calculation process executed here calculates a deviation value, which is one of the relative evaluation standards, based on the scores for each subject of each learner scored in the score extraction process in step S103. To do. In the present embodiment, although the details will be described later, the learning ability is improved by providing learning materials corresponding to the deviation values of the learners.

  The deviation value calculated in the evaluation criterion calculation process in step S106 can relatively determine the score of one learner among a plurality of learners, for example, the score of the test question. However, even if the score is high or low as a whole, it is possible to relatively determine at which level the score of each learner is located in the overall learner. That is, it is possible to relatively determine the current academic ability of each learner.

  Moreover, in this embodiment, as a criterion for evaluating the learner's academic ability (learning ability), not only the score for the test question and the acquisition level of the language operation skill, but also the deviation value described above as one of the evaluation criteria, By providing appropriate learning materials to the learners, we aim to improve the learners' academic ability (learning ability).

  Next, the control device 2 of the learning power enhancement system 1 functions as a learning material extraction unit and executes a learning material extraction process (step S107). The learning material extraction process executed here is the learning level of each learner's academic ability determined in the above-described ability determination process in step S104 and the language operation skill of each learner determined in the language operation skill determination process in step S105. Based on the deviation value of each learner calculated in the evaluation criterion calculation process in step S106, the learning material optimal for improving the learner's academic ability (learning ability) is extracted from the learning material storage means. To decide. The extraction and determination of learning materials will be described in detail later.

  Further, in the learning material extraction process, the usage guidance stored in the learning material storage means corresponding to the extracted learning material is also extracted and determined.

  Further, the usage guidance determined here is, for example, an instruction book of a learning material, a learning order when a plurality of learning materials are extracted, or an educator of the learner (for example, , Junior high school teachers) point out the learner's weak points and provide advice on how to improve them. It is something that is remembered.

  Finally, the learning power enhancement system 1 executes a process of providing learning materials and usage guidance (step S108). In the learning material and usage guidance providing process executed here, the learning material and usage guidance determined in the learning material extraction process (step S107) are provided to each learner. .

  As a method for providing learning materials and usage guidance by the learning power enhancement system 1, for example, the learning materials and usage guidance are printed in advance, and the corresponding learning materials and usage guidance are provided in writing, or the learning power is strengthened. The learning material and usage guidance are displayed on the display 22 (see FIG. 3) attached to the system 1, or the learning material and usage guidance are similarly displayed on the printer 21 (see FIG. 3) attached to the learning power enhancement system 1. If the network is composed of the learning power enhancement system and the learner terminal as described above, the learning materials and usage guidance are sent to the learner terminal and provided. It is also possible to do.

[2. Specific configuration of learning power enhancement system 1]
A specific configuration of the learning power enhancement system 1 according to the present embodiment will be described more specifically with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing a configuration of the learning power enhancement system 1 in the present embodiment. In the present embodiment, a case where a personal computer is used as the learning power enhancement system 1 will be described as an example.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the learning power enhancement system 1 according to the present embodiment includes a control unit 10, a storage unit 11, an I / O interface 12, a key controller 14, a printer controller 15, a display controller 16, and an external communication controller 17. Is provided.

  The control unit 10 includes a CPU, a ROM, a RAM (not shown), and the like. The ROM stores various information and various programs for operating the learning power enhancement system 1 and various tables to be described later. The CPU reads this program from the ROM and executes it, thereby the learning power enhancement system 1. It functions as the control device 2 (see FIG. 1).

  In addition, the control unit 10 controls the operation of the learning ability enhancement system 1 according to the program stored in the ROM, whereby various means (test result input means, score extraction means, achievement ability determination means, language in the present embodiment) It functions as an operation skill determining means, an evaluation criterion calculating means, and a learning material extracting means).

  As the storage unit 11, for example, a large-capacity hard disk drive is used, and a test result storage unit (test result storage unit), a learning material storage unit (learning material storage unit), and a usage guidance storage unit (use guidance storage unit). Allocated in a predetermined area. That is, the storage unit 11 is the storage device 3 (see FIG. 1) that functions as a test result storage unit, a learning material storage unit, and a usage guidance storage unit in the present embodiment.

  The I / O interface 12 (input / output interface) controls input / output of data between the control unit 10 and peripheral devices (storage unit 11, key controller 14, printer controller 15, display controller 16, external communication controller 17).

  When the key controller 14 detects an operation of the keyboard 20, the key controller 14 transmits a predetermined detection signal to the control unit 10. In addition, as described above, the keyboard 20 in the present embodiment may be used to store the test result in the test result storage unit (test result storage unit).

  The printer controller 15 performs control for causing the printer 21 to output predetermined data in accordance with an instruction from the control unit 10. In addition, as described above, the printer 21 according to the present embodiment may be used to provide the extracted learning material to the learner.

  The display controller 16 displays predetermined information on the display 22 in accordance with an instruction from the control unit 10. Note that the predetermined information displayed on the display 22 is information that allows an administrator (including maintenance and maintenance personnel) to understand the operation status of the learning ability enhancing system 1 in the present embodiment.

  The external communication controller 17 controls data capture between the externally connected scanner 23 and the control unit 10. Further, the scanner 23 in the present embodiment may be used to store the test result in the test result storage unit (test result storage unit), similarly to the keyboard 20.

  The keyboard 20, printer 21, display 22, and the like described above are not limited in function in the present invention, and are generally provided as standard on a personal computer, and may include a mouse or the like.

  Further, when a server or the like is used as the learning power enhancing system 1, the keyboard 20, printer 21, display 22 and the like described above may not be provided. In this embodiment, the control device 2 and the memory shown in FIG. The apparatus 3 is the minimum essential configuration requirement.

[3. Language operation skill diagnosis contents]
Here, a plurality of evaluation items having different levels of difficulty for measuring the language operation skill, which is a feature of the present embodiment, will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing diagnosis contents of language operation skills for every five items.

  As shown in FIG. 11, in this embodiment, five evaluation items are provided. In the five evaluation items, diagnostic contents for measuring the language operation skill that is the basis of the learner's ability to learn are set for each evaluation item having a different difficulty level.

  The five evaluation items shown in FIG. 11 accurately represent the language skill of the learner, for example, the ability to understand the meaning by listening to, speaking, reading, and writing the language, and to transmit will and information. In order to measure the ability to understand, the ability to uncover the key concepts in the sentence and understand the meaning accurately, the ability to form an image accurately by combining things conditioned by multiple sentences, The diagnostic contents are set in stages from item 1 having the lowest difficulty level to item 5 having the highest difficulty level. This diagnosis content is a diagnosis content common to a plurality of subjects (for example, five subjects of Japanese language, mathematics, science, society, and English).

  That is, as shown in FIG. 11, the item 1 is an evaluation item that can be said to be the basic of the language manipulation skill with the lowest difficulty, and the language manipulation skill of “can understand the contents and meaning of short sentences and questions accurately” is evaluated. Diagnosis content is set.

  Item 2 is an evaluation item having a higher degree of difficulty than Item 1, and diagnostic content for evaluating the language operation skill “can understand the content of the words that are the center of learning” is set. Furthermore, item 3 is an evaluation item that is more difficult than item 2, and the language operation is such that “it is possible to grasp the relationship between words and short sentences and the expressed contents and grasp the meaning”. The diagnostic content for evaluating the skill is set.

  Next, item 4 is an evaluation item that asks about the expressive power of one's words, which is generally difficult, and is set with diagnostic contents for evaluating the language operation skill of “you can compose a short sentence of required contents”. ing. Item 5 is an evaluation item with a high degree of difficulty among the five items, and a diagnosis content for evaluating the language operation skill “Long sentences can be read accurately” is set.

  In the present embodiment, a plurality of basic problems for measuring the level of language operation skill (learning level) based on the five evaluation items composed of the above-described diagnostic contents having different degrees of difficulty are obtained at a required score. Exam questions are set in advance across subjects.

  More specifically, for example, the required points for the basic problem in Item 1 are 70 points in total, 15 points for Japanese, 20 points for mathematics, 13 points for society, 12 points for science, and 10 points for English. Each is set for a plurality of subjects. Similarly, items 2 to 5 are also set as basic problems for each of a plurality of subjects with required points.

  As will be described in detail later, according to the total score for each of the five evaluation items, the learning level of each of the five items is evaluated in three stages, and a learning material corresponding to the evaluation is provided. I am trying to improve my skills.

  Note that the total points required for the basic problem for each of the plurality of evaluation items need not be the same. For example, Item 1 has a total score of 70, Item 2 has a score of 50, Item 3 has a score of 75, etc. Different total points may be used. In addition, although it is desirable to set a basic question for all of a plurality of subjects, it is not necessarily required to be set for all subjects. For example, depending on the configuration of the test question, item 3 of the evaluation items shown in FIG. May be set except for subjects that are difficult to set (for example, English), and item 5 may be set only for the national language.

  Moreover, in this embodiment, although the number of several diagnostic items is demonstrated as five items, the number of diagnostic items is not limited to five items, For example, even if it is five items or more, five items It may be the following. In addition, when creating a basic problem to measure the language operation skill of a learner, the contents of diagnosis for each diagnosis item set in common for multiple subjects are created according to the characteristics of each subject. It is desirable to create a basic problem based on the preparation procedure for each subject with more detailed settings according to the subject.

[4. Specific description of processing executed in learning power enhancement system 1]
Here, language operation skill determination processing (FIG. 2, step S105), which is characteristic processing executed in the learning ability enhancement system 1, evaluation criterion calculation processing (FIG. 2, step S106), learning teaching material extraction processing (FIG. 2). Step S107) will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. Here, the processing is described for a predetermined learner.

  4 is a flowchart for explaining language manipulation skill determination processing, FIG. 5 is a flowchart for explaining evaluation criterion calculation processing, and FIG. 6 is a flowchart for explaining learning teaching material extraction processing. 7 is a table for determining the level of acquisition of language operation skills, FIG. 8 is a table for determining a provision pattern of learning materials based on language operation skills, and FIG. 9 is a table of learning materials provided in accordance with patterns based on language operation skills. FIG. 10 is a determination table of learning materials provided according to a pattern based on the deviation value. These tables are stored in the ROM of the control unit.

  First, the language operation skill determination process will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

  First, the CPU of the control unit 10 extracts the score for each of the plurality of items described above from the test result of a predetermined learner (step S201). In this process, the CPU of the control unit 10 obtains the score of the basic problem preset in the required allocation for each of the plurality of evaluation items having different difficulty levels across the plurality of subjects (that is, the correct answer rate of the basic problem). Extract.

  More specifically, the score of the basic question for each of the five evaluation items shown in FIG. 11 (that is, the correct answer rate of the basic question) is extracted and totaled.

  Next, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines the acquisition level of the language operation skill according to the total score for each extracted item (step S202). In this process, referring to FIG. 7, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines in which position the total score for each item of the predetermined learner is in the distribution of the total points for all the learner items. The acquisition level of the language operation skill of the learner is determined.

  Specifically, as shown in FIG. 7, when the total score of item 1 of a predetermined learner is included in the upper 30% of the distribution area of the total score for each item of all learners, The learning level of the language operation skill in item 1 of the learner is determined as “◎” indicating the A stage, and when included in the middle 65%, the learning level of the language operation skill is “◯” indicating the B stage. Is determined. If it is included in the lower 5%, the learning level of the language operation skill is determined as “Δ (▲)” indicating the C level. Similarly, three levels of acquisition level of a predetermined learner's language operation skill are sequentially determined for each of five evaluation items.

  Here, the language operation skill evaluation table (FIG. 7) referred to in step S202 described above (processing for determining the acquisition level of the language operation skill) will be described.

  As shown in FIG. 7, the evaluation of the language operation skill in the present embodiment is represented by three learning levels for each of the five evaluation items. The numbers indicating the distribution area of the total points for each item for determining the acquisition level are not uniform.

  More specifically, in item 1, when it is included in the distribution region of the top 30%, the acquisition level is determined as “A stage (◎)”, whereas in item 2, the top 20% When the items 3 and 4 are included in the distribution region of the top 10% and the item 5 is included in the distribution of the top 20%, the learning level is determined as “A stage (◎)”.

  The distribution area for each item determined as “B stage (◯)” is 65% for item 1, 60% for item 2 and item 3, 80% for item 4, and 55% for item 5. Different numbers are assigned. Further, the distribution area for each item determined as “C stage (Δ)” is 5% for item 1, 20% for item 2, 30% for item 3, 10% for item 4, and 25 for item 5. %.

  This is a number assigned according to the difference in difficulty for each evaluation item from the actual test results. As the difficulty increases from item 1 having the lowest difficulty to items 2 and 3, the “C stage (Δ ) ”Is increased, while the number (%) allocated to“ A stage (◎) ”is lower. For item 4 and item 5, it may not be possible to set a basic problem for all of a plurality of subjects, so “A stage (◎)”, “B stage (○)” and “C stage (△ ) "Is different from the numbers allocated to items 1 to 3.

  Returning to the description of the language operation skill determination process with reference to FIG.

  After determining the acquisition level of the language operation skill in step S202, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines the learning material pattern to be provided to the learner from the determined acquisition level of the language operation skill for each item of the predetermined learner. Is determined (step S203). In this process, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines the provision pattern of the learning material to be provided to the learner from the acquisition level of the language operation skill for each item of the predetermined learner with reference to FIG.

  More specifically, for example, the acquisition level of item 1 of a predetermined learner is “A stage (◎)”, the acquisition level of item 2 is “B stage (◯)”, and the acquisition level of item 3 is “C stage” In the case of “(Δ)”, as shown in FIG. 8, “B” is determined as the provision pattern of the learning material to be provided to the learner. When this process ends, the language operation skill determination process ends.

  Note that the learning material provision pattern determined here is referred to in a learning material extraction process (see FIG. 6) described later, and the learning material provided to the learner is extracted.

  Here, the learning material provision pattern determination table (see FIG. 8) referred to in the process of determining the learning material pattern to be provided to the learner described above (step S203) will be described. Note that “ANY” in item 4 and item 5 in FIG. 8 is a case where the acquisition level may be any of three levels.

  As shown in FIG. 8, in this embodiment, five types of learning material provision patterns “A” to “E” are set. There are certain conditions for determining the provision pattern of this learning material.

  That is, the condition for determining the pattern “A” is that the acquisition level of the item 1 is “C level (▲)”, or the acquisition levels of the items 2 and 3 are both “C level (Δ)”. This is the case. In the present embodiment, in FIG. 8, only the acquisition level of item 1 is indicated as “C level (▲)” indicating the lowest level, and in the acquisition levels of other items 2 to 5, “C level (Δ The details of the reason will be described later.

  Further, the condition for determining the pattern “B” is a case where “C stage (Δ)” of the acquisition level is included in any one of the items 2 and 3.

  In addition, the condition for determining the pattern “C” is that any of the acquisition levels of items 1 to 3 is “B stage (◯)” or higher, but the acquisition level “A stage (◎)” is one or less. It is.

  In addition, the condition for determining the pattern “D” is that each of the acquisition levels of items 1 to 3 is “B stage (◯)” or more and two or more “A stage (◎)”. Or, all the acquisition levels of items 1 to 3 are “A stage (◎)”, but either of item 4 or item 5 is the acquisition level “C stage (Δ)”.

  Finally, the condition for determining the pattern “E” is that all acquisition levels of items 1 to 3 are “A level (（)”, and the acquisition level of item 4 or item 5 is “B level (○ ) ”Or more.

  In other words, in the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 8, five types of provision patterns (that is, pattern “A”) of learning materials to be provided to the learner according to three levels of acquisition levels corresponding to the five evaluation items. ~ Pattern "E") will be determined.

  Next, the evaluation criterion calculation process will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

  First, the CPU of the control unit 10 executes a process of calculating a deviation value from the score of a predetermined learner's test result and the score distribution of the entire learner (step S301). In this process, the CPU of the control unit 10 derives a deviation value, which is one of the relative evaluation criteria, from the score for each of a plurality of subjects of a predetermined learner.

  Then, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines the pattern of the learning material to be provided based on the deviation value calculated for each of the plurality of subjects of the predetermined learner (step S302). In this process, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines a provision pattern of a learning material to be provided to the learner according to a deviation value for each of a plurality of subjects of a predetermined learner with reference to FIG.

  Specifically, as shown in FIG. 10, when the deviation value of a predetermined learner is 44 or less, “I” is determined as the provision pattern of the learning material provided to the learner, and the deviation value is 45. If the number is 54 or less, “II” is determined as the learning material provision pattern. When the deviation value is 55 or more, “III” is determined as the provision pattern of the learning material. When this process ends, the evaluation criterion calculation process ends.

  In addition, the learning material provision pattern determined here based on the deviation value is referred to in a learning material extraction process (see FIG. 6) described later, and the learning material provided to the learner is extracted. become.

  Finally, the learning material extraction process will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

  First, the CPU of the control unit 10 executes a process of extracting learning materials from the provided learning material patterns determined based on the language operation skill acquisition level in the above-described language operation skill determination process (see FIG. 4). (Step S401). In this process, the CPU of the control unit 10 refers to FIG. 9 and selects a provided pattern (pattern A to pattern E) from among a plurality of learning materials stored in the storage unit 11 (learning material storage means). Determine the learning materials that are appropriate.

  That is, as shown in FIG. 9, when the provided pattern is “A”, “Language” beginner and intermediate learning materials and “Read” beginner learning are used as learning materials to improve language operation skills. The teaching materials and the learning materials for beginners in the “writing” edition are decided.

  In addition, when the provided pattern is “B”, “Language” beginner, intermediate and advanced study materials, “Read” beginner and intermediate study materials as learning materials to improve language operation skills, and , Beginner and intermediate learning materials in the “Writing” edition will be decided.

  If the provided pattern is “C”, the “Language” advanced learning materials, the “Read” intermediate learning materials, and the “Writing” edition are used as learning materials to improve language operation skills. Intermediate learning materials are determined.

  If the provided pattern is “D”, “Language” advanced learning materials, “Read” intermediate and advanced learning materials, and “Writing” as learning materials to improve language operation skills The intermediate and advanced learning materials are determined.

  Finally, when the provided pattern is “E”, the advanced learning materials in the “read” edition and the advanced learning materials in the “writing” edition are determined as learning materials to improve the language operation skills. become.

  The learning material for improving the language operation skill provided to the learner is created along the five diagnostic items having different degrees of difficulty shown in FIG. 11. For example, the provided pattern of the learning material is “A”. The learning materials for beginners in the “Language”, “Reading”, and “Beginning” sections provided to learners in the “Language” section, especially “Short sentences and questions” It is a learning material to reinforce the basics of language operation skills, in other words, in order to reinforce the content and meaning accurately.

  Then, the CPU of the control unit 10 extracts the learning material from the provision pattern of the learning material determined based on the deviation value of the predetermined learner in the above-described evaluation criterion calculation process (see FIG. 5) (step S402). Execute the process. In this process, the CPU of the control unit 10 refers to FIG. 10 to provide provided patterns (pattern I to pattern III) for each of a plurality of subjects from a plurality of learning materials stored in the learning material storage means. Determine the learning materials that are appropriate.

  That is, as shown in FIG. 10, when the provision pattern is “I”, each subject elementary level teaching material, when the provision pattern is “II”, each subject standard level teaching material, and the provision pattern is “III”. In this case, each subject advanced level teaching material is determined as a learning material provided to the learner.

  And CPU of the control part 10 performs the process which extracts the usage guidance according to the determined learning material (step S403). In this processing, the CPU of the control unit 10 determines usage guidance corresponding to the learning material determined in the processing of step S401 or step S402 from among the plurality of usage guidance stored in the learning material storage means. . When this process ends, the learning material extraction process ends.

  Note that the usage guidance determined in step S403 is not associated with all the learning materials stored in the learning material storage unit and stored in the learning material storage unit. In some cases, only the learning material is stored in the learning material storage means as a commentary.

  Here, in FIG. 8, only the acquisition level of item 1 is marked as “▲” as a mark indicating the lowest level C level, and “△” is marked in the learning levels of other items 2 to 5 Will be described.

  In the present embodiment, only the minimum acquisition level of item 1 in FIG. 8 is marked with “▲” to distinguish it from other items. The reason for the applicant's language operation skill is to improve the learner's learning ability. It can be said that this is the basis for focusing on the importance.

  That is, the diagnosis item “1. The contents and meanings of short sentences and questions can be understood accurately” (see FIG. 11) is for evaluating the language operation skill that can be said to be the basic of the language operation skill with the lowest difficulty. It is. Therefore, the learner who is evaluated as the lowest “C stage ▲” in this item 1 does not have the basic language operation skill.

  When the results of the test actually conducted by the present applicant were analyzed according to the diagnosis contents set in FIG. 11, among the total number of subjects “20081”, it was evaluated as the lowest “C stage ▲” in item 1. The number of learners was “632”, the number of learners evaluated as the lowest “C stage Δ” in item 2 was “3515”, hereinafter “6317” in item 3, and “2419” in item 4. In the “name” item 5, the result “5222 names” was obtained.

  Furthermore, based on the results evaluated for each item in three stages (that is, “A stage (◎)”, “B stage (◯)”, “C stage (△ (▲))”) When the correlation between items was analyzed, for example, a learner who was evaluated as “B stage (○)” in item 1 was evaluated as “A stage (◎)” in item 2, which is more difficult than that, Or, item 2 may be evaluated as “C stage (Δ)” or the learner may be evaluated as “B stage (◯)” in item 3, which is more difficult than that, but item 1 is the lowest. It was found that the learners who were evaluated as “C stage (▲)” were all included in the lowest “C stage (Δ)” in the remaining items 2 to 5 as well.

  In other words, learners who have been evaluated as the lowest “C stage (▲)” in Item 1, that is, learners who do not have the basics of language operation skills, can understand the contents and meaning of short sentences and questions accurately. Unless the basic language operation skill of “.” (See FIG. 11) is trained, the learning materials according to the scores and deviation values of the conventional test results cannot be expected to improve further.

  On the other hand, if the basics of language operation skills can be trained at the early stage of education (elementary school, junior high school), students will improve their comprehension ability when attending classes and answer questions appropriately. In addition, it will lead to the establishment of self-learning results in home learning, so it is possible to improve the academic ability of learners with a low level of language operation skills.

  Further, from the correlation between items for each learner, a strong correlation between items, especially item 1, item 2, and item 3 (for example, a learner who has been evaluated as “B stage (◯)” in item 1, The results of analysis that the majority of items 2 and 3 are “B stage (○)” were obtained, so improving the learner's language operation skills, improving the academic ability of multiple subjects as a whole Can also be planned.

  As described above, the learning power enhancement system 1 according to the present embodiment focuses on the training of language operation skills that are the basis of learning ability in order to improve the learner's academic ability. Conduct a test that sets the basic problem to measure the level of acquisition of operation skills across multiple subjects, and extract the score of the basic problem from the test results to identify the learner's level of language operation skill acquisition In addition, by providing learning materials according to the above, especially for learners with low language skills, improve the level of language skills and improve the learning ability that is the foundation for improving academic ability. Can do.

  In this embodiment, a basic problem for measuring the language operation skill of a learner is set in advance with a required score for a test problem across a plurality of subjects, and the score (response rate) of this basic problem is Although the learning level of the language operation skill of the learner is determined, the present invention is not limited to this, and for example, a plurality of test questions shown in FIG. The score (answer rate) of the problem corresponding to the diagnosis content for each item may be extracted, and the learning level of the learner's language operation skill may be determined accordingly.

  In the present embodiment, not only learning materials for improving language operation skills but also conventional learning materials corresponding to the deviation value of the learner are provided. At the same time, it is possible to improve scholastic ability by focusing on subjects that the learner is not good at among several subjects.

  In addition, as described above, language operation skills are necessary for learning across multiple subjects, so improving the language operation skills improves learners' learning skills across multiple subjects. We can expect effect to make.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, the following effects can be expected.

  (1) Test result storage means (storage device 3, storage unit 11) for storing a plurality of learner names and results of a test of a plurality of subjects conducted for the plurality of learners in association with each learner name And score extraction means (the control device 2 and the CPU of the control unit 10) for extracting the score, which is the test result stored in the test result storage means, for each evaluation purpose set for each test, and the score extraction means Scholastic ability judging means (the CPU of the control device 2 and the control unit 10) for judging the scholastic ability of the learner based on the score extracted by the above, and the score rate of the questions provided at the required points for each of the test questions of the plurality of subjects Therefore, the learning power enhancement system 1 includes language operation skill determination means (control device 2, CPU of the control unit 10) that determines the level of language operation skill that is the ability to manipulate the language that is the basis of the learning power. For example, learning It is possible to measure the language operation skills accurately.

  (2) Levels of language operation skills determined by learning material storage means (storage device 3, storage unit 11) storing a plurality of learning materials and language operation skill determination means (CPU of control device 2, control unit 10) The learning material extracting means (the control device 2 and the CPU of the control unit 10) for extracting learning materials for improving the language operation skill from the learning material storage means according to It is possible to extract learning materials that can improve the language operation skills of the students more effectively.

  (3) By setting the basic problem for measuring the level of the language operation skill at the required points in the test questions of each subject, for example, learning regardless of the subject that the learner is not good at It is possible to measure a person's language operation skill.

  (4) The basic question is set for each of a plurality of evaluation items having different difficulty levels in the test questions of each subject, for example, the level of the language operation skill (learning level) of the learner Different evaluation items can be distinguished.

  (5) The language operation skill determination means (the CPU of the control device 2 and the control unit 10) determines the level of the language operation skill based on the score rate for each of the plurality of items in the basic problem, for example, review In the distribution of scoring rates for each of multiple learners, the scoring rate of each learner can be accurately determined by discriminating the scoring rate of each learner according to a certain standard. Easy to do.

  (6) Based on the score stored in the test result storage means (storage device 3, storage unit 11), the evaluation standard calculation means (control device 2, control unit 10 of the control device 10, which calculates academic achievement evaluation criteria including at least a deviation value) By further providing a CPU, the learner's scholastic ability (learning ability) can be evaluated not only by the language operation skill level (learning level) but also by the learner's deviation value (ie, relative evaluation).

  (7) The learning material storage unit (the storage device 3, the storage unit 11) stores usage guidance corresponding to each of the stored learning materials, and the learning material extraction unit extracts the learning material. In this case, by extracting the usage guidance corresponding to the learning material, for example, the learning efficiency for the learning material extracted according to the level (learning level) or deviation value of the language operation skill of the learner is increased. Can be improved.

  As mentioned above, although this invention has been demonstrated through each embodiment, this invention is not limited to these. Moreover, each effect mentioned above only enumerated the most suitable effect which arises from this invention, and the effect by this invention is not limited to what was described in this Embodiment.

1 Learning power enhancement system 1
2 Control device 3 Storage device 10 Control unit 11 Storage unit

Claims (7)

A test result storage means for storing a plurality of learner names and results of tests of a plurality of subjects conducted for the plurality of learners in association with each learner name;
Score extraction means for extracting the score, which is the test result stored in the test result storage means, for each evaluation purpose set for each test;
Scholastic ability judging means for judging the scholastic ability of the learner based on the score extracted by the score extracting means;
Language operation skill determination means for determining the level of language operation skill, which is the ability to manipulate the language that is the basis of the ability to learn, from the scoring rate of the problem provided at a required score for each of the multiple subject test questions;
Learning power enhancement system characterized by comprising. A learning material storage means for storing a plurality of learning materials;
Learning material extracting means for extracting learning materials for improving language operation skills from the learning material storage means according to the level of language operation skills determined by the language operation skill determining means;
The learning power enhancing system according to claim 1, further comprising: The learning ability enhancing system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a basic problem for measuring the level of the language operation skill is set with a required score in the test problem of each subject.   4. The learning ability enhancing system according to claim 3, wherein the base problem is set for each of a plurality of evaluation items having different degrees of difficulty in the test questions of each subject. The language operation skill determining means includes:
The learning ability enhancing system according to claim 4, wherein the level of the language operation skill is determined based on a score rate for each of the plurality of evaluation items in the base problem.   The evaluation criterion calculating means for calculating a scholastic ability evaluation criterion including at least a deviation value based on the score stored in the test result storage means. Learning power enhancement system. The learning material storage means includes
The usage guidance corresponding to each of the stored learning materials is stored,
The learning power enhancement system according to claim 2 , wherein when the learning material is extracted, the learning material extraction unit also extracts the usage guidance corresponding to the learning material.

Images