JP4997642B2 - Interference analyzer for flexible parts - Google Patents

Interference analyzer for flexible parts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4997642B2
JP4997642B2 JP2008096651A JP2008096651A JP4997642B2 JP 4997642 B2 JP4997642 B2 JP 4997642B2 JP 2008096651 A JP2008096651 A JP 2008096651A JP 2008096651 A JP2008096651 A JP 2008096651A JP 4997642 B2 JP4997642 B2 JP 4997642B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
interference
parts
database
flexible
input
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2008096651A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009251770A (en
Inventor
哲也 高橋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Motor East Japan Inc
Original Assignee
Kanto Auto Works Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kanto Auto Works Ltd filed Critical Kanto Auto Works Ltd
Priority to JP2008096651A priority Critical patent/JP4997642B2/en
Publication of JP2009251770A publication Critical patent/JP2009251770A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4997642B2 publication Critical patent/JP4997642B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/80Technologies aiming to reduce greenhouse gasses emissions common to all road transportation technologies
    • Y02T10/82Elements for improving aerodynamics

Description

本発明は、柔軟物の特定部位の移動に伴う柔軟物の変形過程を解析して、画像表示装置の画面に表示するようにした柔軟物の変形解析装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a deformation analysis apparatus for a flexible object that analyzes a deformation process of a flexible object accompanying movement of a specific part of the flexible object and displays the deformation process on a screen of an image display apparatus.

図3に示すように、自動車のボンネット1内などには、バッテリーBなどの剛体の他、ホース2やワイヤハーネス3などのいわゆる柔軟物がある。このような柔軟物は、端部を固定されているものの、中間部分は固定されておらず、エンジンの振動などによりある一定の範囲において振れ動く。   As shown in FIG. 3, there are so-called flexible objects such as a hose 2 and a wire harness 3 in addition to a rigid body such as a battery B in the hood 1 of an automobile. Such a flexible object has an end portion fixed, but an intermediate portion is not fixed, and swings within a certain range due to engine vibration or the like.

従来、自動車の設計段階において、ワイヤハーネスの索設を想定し、仮想試作が行われている。これは、ワイヤハーネスと他の構成要素との干渉が許される要件をデータベース化し、仮想試作上のワイヤハーネスデータと上記データベースとをリンクさせ、相手部品との隙wを計測し、上記データベースの隙要件と比較するという手順で、仮想試作段階で自動的に干渉の検討を行い、評価の抜けや漏れによる実車問題の削減や検討項数の削減を狙いとしている。   Conventionally, in the design stage of an automobile, a virtual trial has been performed assuming that a wire harness is installed. This is a database of requirements that allow interference between the wire harness and other components, link the wire prototype data on the virtual prototype with the database, measure the gap w with the mating part, and The procedure of comparing with requirements automatically examines interference at the virtual prototype stage, aiming to reduce actual vehicle problems due to missing or leaked evaluations and to reduce the number of items examined.

具体的には、図4に示すように、評価が開始すると(ステップS21)、評価対象の入力がなされる(ステップs22)このステップでは、部品のデータの中から自部品と相手部品とを選択する。続いて、入力された自部品の種類の判別が行われる(ステップS23)。自部品の種類は、素線、テープ、コルゲート、シート、チューブなどがあり、部材のデータを参照することで判別される。そして、干渉要件データベースが呼び出される(ステップS24)。   Specifically, as shown in FIG. 4, when the evaluation is started (step S21), an evaluation target is input (step s22). In this step, the self part and the counterpart part are selected from the part data. To do. Subsequently, the type of the input own part is determined (step S23). The types of own parts include a wire, a tape, a corrugate, a sheet, a tube, and the like, and are determined by referring to member data. Then, the interference requirement database is called (step S24).

続いて、相手部品の種類が判別される(ステップS25)。相手部品の種類は板金、エッジ、樹脂、スポット、ホース、その他などに分けられ、それぞれ干渉要件が異なっている。干渉要件データベースは図5に示すように、自部品と相手部品との間に必要な隙間の要件が一対一で対応している。   Subsequently, the type of the counterpart part is determined (step S25). The types of mating parts are divided into sheet metal, edge, resin, spot, hose, etc., with different interference requirements. As shown in FIG. 5, the interference requirement database has a one-to-one correspondence between the requirements of the necessary gap between the own part and the counterpart part.

その後、仮想試作のCADデータ上で隙の算出、すなわち計測が行われる(ステップS26)。この計測結果が干渉要件データベースの該当する数値とが比較される(ステップS27)。例えば干渉要件が0mmであるところ計測結果が5mmであれば判定はOKとなる。その結果がディスプレイに出力される(ステップS28)。このようにして評価が終了する(ステップS29)。   Thereafter, the gap is calculated, that is, measured on the CAD data of the virtual prototype (step S26). This measurement result is compared with the corresponding numerical value in the interference requirement database (step S27). For example, if the interference requirement is 0 mm and the measurement result is 5 mm, the determination is OK. The result is output to the display (step S28). In this way, the evaluation ends (step S29).

このような自動車の設計段階におけるシミュレーションについて、例えば下記の文献1〜3の技術が公開されている。特許文献2には、ワイヤハーネスの支持部位を移動した場合の配索形状及び反力を含む配索特性を有限要素法による解析により画面上で容易に評価可能にするワイヤハーネスの評価装置が開示されている。
特開平2007−080132号公報 特開平2006−210323号公報 特開平2005−038398号公報
For the simulation at the design stage of such an automobile, for example, the techniques of the following documents 1 to 3 are disclosed. Patent Document 2 discloses a wire harness evaluation device that can easily evaluate a wiring characteristic including a wiring shape and a reaction force when the supporting portion of the wire harness is moved on a screen by analysis using a finite element method. Has been.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2007-080132 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2006-210323 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2005-038398

しかしながら、以上説明したような技術では、ワイヤハーネスを剛体として計算がなされている。すなわち、ワイヤハーネス及び周辺部品が常に正寸位置にあることを前提として隙の計測が行われており、エンジンの振動などによって揺動するホース等、一般に柔らか物といわれる部品の可動エリアは考慮がなされていない。そのため、実際に実車の走行テストが行われた段階で干渉の問題が発生する場合があった。また、このような相対運動を起こす部品、すなわち例えばホースやワイヤハーネスなどの柔軟物部品同士は、保護材の有無に関係なく、干渉した段階で問題になる。また、特許文献3には、柔軟物の特定部位を移動させた場合の解析対象の柔軟物全体の変形過程を有限要素法により高精度に解析して画面上で確認可能にする柔軟物の変形解析装置が開示されているが、これは人間がマウス操作でワイヤハーネスを仮想的に動かし、かつ他の部品に当たるか否かの判定を行うものであり、操作が煩雑であると共に、マウス操作で動かした軌跡や動かす位置により、結果に誤差が出る可能性がある。   However, in the technique described above, calculation is performed with the wire harness as a rigid body. In other words, the clearance is measured on the assumption that the wire harness and the peripheral parts are always in the exact position, and the movable area of parts generally called soft objects such as hoses that swing due to engine vibration etc. is considered. Not done. For this reason, there has been a case in which an interference problem occurs at the stage when the actual vehicle driving test is actually performed. In addition, parts that cause such relative movement, that is, flexible parts such as hoses and wire harnesses, become a problem at the stage of interference regardless of the presence or absence of a protective material. Further, Patent Document 3 discloses a deformation of a flexible object that allows a deformation process of the entire flexible object to be analyzed when a specific part of the flexible object is moved to be analyzed with high accuracy by a finite element method and confirmed on a screen. Although an analysis device is disclosed, this is a method in which a human moves a wire harness virtually by a mouse operation and determines whether or not it hits another part. There may be an error in the results depending on the trajectory moved and the position moved.

本発明は、上記問題点に鑑みてなされたものであり、仮想試作段階で予め可動エリアを考慮した干渉検討を行う、干渉解析装置を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an interference analysis apparatus that performs interference examination in consideration of a movable area in advance in a virtual trial production stage.

本発明の柔軟物部品の干渉解析装置は、自部品を選択し入力するための入力部と、各種の自部品と各種の他部品との間に必要な間隔の干渉要件データベース及び部品のデータベースを格納する記憶部と、入力部によって入力された自部品及び他部品の種類の判別を行い、データベースから呼び出した情報に基づいて自部品として基端が拘束される柔軟物部品の可動エリアと他部品として基端が拘束される柔軟物部品の可動エリアとを予測し、これらの柔軟物部品の可動エリア同士の隙の計測を行い、この計測結果と干渉要件データベースにおける上記自部品及び上記他部品の間で必要な間隔とを比較する処理手段と、処理手段による比較結果を表示する表示部と、を備えたことを特徴とする。 Interference analysis device of a flexible material component of the present invention includes an input unit for inputting select own component, interference requirements database and component database of spacing required between the various self-components and various other components of the The movable part and other parts of the flexible part whose base end is constrained as its own part based on the information called from the database, the storage part to be stored, the self part and other parts input by the input part as predicted the movable area of the flexible object part base end is restrained, performs measurement of the gap between the moving area of the flexible object parts, of the own component and the other components in the measurement result and interference requirements database And a display unit for displaying a comparison result by the processing unit.

本発明の柔軟物部品の干渉解析装置によれば、人が介在する検討工程を減らすことができると共に、検討時の誤差による漏れをなくすことができる。   According to the interference analysis apparatus for flexible parts of the present invention, it is possible to reduce the examination process involving humans and to eliminate leakage due to an error during examination.

以下、本発明の好ましい実施の形態を、添付図面を参照しながら詳細に説明する。
本発明の自動干渉検討方法は、ホース2やワイヤハーネス3などのいわゆる柔軟物の可動エリア、具体的には図3においてホース2の2a,2b間、またワイヤハーネス3であれば3a,3b間のエリアを、CAE解析、FEM解析によるワイヤハーネス可動範囲予測手法や幾何学解析、または実験値によるエリア予測手法などにより算出することを特徴とする。また、本発明の自動干渉検討システムは、図2に示すように、表示部としてのディスプレイ5と、処理手段としてのCPU6と、記憶部7と、入力部4とを備える。
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The automatic interference examination method of the present invention is a movable area of a so-called flexible object such as the hose 2 and the wire harness 3, specifically, between 2 a and 2 b of the hose 2 in FIG. 3 and between 3 a and 3 b in the case of the wire harness 3. This area is calculated by a wire harness movable range prediction method or geometric analysis based on CAE analysis or FEM analysis, or an area prediction method based on experimental values. In addition, as shown in FIG. 2, the automatic interference examination system of the present invention includes a display 5 as a display unit, a CPU 6 as a processing unit, a storage unit 7, and an input unit 4.

自動干渉検討方法は、具体的には、図2に示すように、評価が開始すると(ステップS11)、ディスプレイ5上に評価対象の入力欄が表示され、評価対象の入力が促される(ステップS12)。このステップでは、記憶部7に格納された部品のデータの中から、評価対象である柔軟物部品の情報が呼び出され、操作者は、自部品を選択し、入力する。ここで、特定の相手部品との干渉についてのみ解析する場合には、相手部品も選択し、入力する。   Specifically, in the automatic interference examination method, as shown in FIG. 2, when the evaluation is started (step S11), an input column for the evaluation target is displayed on the display 5, and the input of the evaluation target is prompted (step S12). ). In this step, information on the flexible part to be evaluated is called out from the part data stored in the storage unit 7, and the operator selects and inputs his / her part. Here, when analyzing only interference with a specific counterpart component, the counterpart component is also selected and input.

続いて、入力された自部品の種類の判別が行われると共に、可動エリアの予測処理が行われる(ステップS13)。自部品の種類は、素線、テープ、コルゲート、シート、チューブなどがあり、CPU6が、記憶部7に格納された部材のデータベースを参照することでこの種類を判別する。ここで、データベースには自部品それぞれについての識別データ及びCADデータのほか、物性、形状、拘束位置及び拘束方向などのデータが格納されている。これらのデータに基づき、CPU6は、従来のCAE解析、FEM解析といったワイヤハーネス可動範囲予測手法や幾何学解析、または実験値によるエリア予測手法などにより、自部品であるワイヤハーネスの可動エリアを予測する。   Subsequently, the type of the input self-part is determined, and a movable area prediction process is performed (step S13). The types of own parts include a wire, a tape, a corrugated sheet, a tube, and the like, and the CPU 6 discriminates this type by referring to a member database stored in the storage unit 7. Here, in addition to identification data and CAD data for each part, the database stores data such as physical properties, shapes, restraint positions, and restraint directions. Based on these data, the CPU 6 predicts the movable area of the wire harness that is its own part by a wire harness movable range prediction method such as conventional CAE analysis and FEM analysis, geometric analysis, or an area prediction method based on experimental values. .

その後、記憶部7に格納された干渉要件データベースが呼び出される(ステップS14)。この干渉要件データベースは例えば図5に示すように、列方向見出しに表示されている自部品である素線、テープ、コルゲートチューブ等と、行方向見出しに表示されている相手部品である板金、エッジ、樹脂、スポット等との間に必要な間隔の要件がデータベース化されている。図5に示すデータベースでは、例えば素線と板金との間の要件は10mmとなっており、すなわち10mm以上の間隔が要件となるが、コルゲートと板金との間隔は0であり、間隔をあけなくてもよいということになる。   Thereafter, the interference requirement database stored in the storage unit 7 is called (step S14). For example, as shown in FIG. 5, the interference requirement database includes a wire, a tape, a corrugated tube, and the like that are displayed in the column direction heading, and a sheet metal and an edge that are displayed in the row direction heading. The requirements for the distance between the resin, the spot, etc. are compiled in a database. In the database shown in FIG. 5, for example, the requirement between the wire and the sheet metal is 10 mm, that is, the interval of 10 mm or more is the requirement, but the interval between the corrugate and the sheet metal is 0, and there is no gap. That's okay.

続いて、相手部品の種類が判別される(ステップS15)。相手部品の種類は板金、エッジ、樹脂、スポット、ホース、その他などがある。
そして、ホースなどの振動部品のエリア予測が行われる(ステップS16)。この予測は、FEM(有限要素法)によるエリア予測や、幾何学手法、または実験値によるエリア予測手法などにより算出することができる。
Subsequently, the type of the counterpart part is determined (step S15). Types of mating parts include sheet metal, edge, resin, spot, hose, etc.
And area prediction of vibration components, such as a hose, is performed (step S16). This prediction can be calculated by area prediction by FEM (finite element method), a geometric method, or an area prediction method by an experimental value.

その後、CPU6により仮想試作のシミュレーション上で隙wの計測が行われる(ステップS17)。続いて、この計測結果と干渉要件データベースの該当する数値とが比較される(ステップS18)。例えば干渉要件が0mmであるところ計測結果が5mmであれば判定はOKとなり、干渉要件が5mmであるところ計測結果が0mmであれば判定はNGとなる。その結果がディスプレイ5に出力される(ステップS19)。このようにして評価が終了する(ステップS20)。   Thereafter, the CPU 6 measures the gap w on the virtual trial simulation (step S17). Subsequently, the measurement result is compared with the corresponding numerical value in the interference requirement database (step S18). For example, if the measurement result is 5 mm when the interference requirement is 0 mm, the determination is OK. If the measurement result is 0 mm when the interference requirement is 5 mm, the determination is NG. The result is output to the display 5 (step S19). In this way, the evaluation ends (step S20).

以上のように、本発明によれば、揺動し、もしくは相対運動を起こすワイヤハーネス及びホースなどの柔軟物部品の振れるエリアを予測し、そのエリア同士で隙間や干渉度合いを計測するため、従来は検出することが不可能であった、揺動や相対運動による干渉問題を検出することができる。このようにすることで、仮想試作の段階で相対運動による干渉の問題を検出することができるため、実車を試作した際に発生する問題を削減することができる。また、可動エリアが自動的に検討されるから、人が介在する検討工程を減らすことができると共に、検討時の誤差による漏れをなくすことができる。   As described above, according to the present invention, an area in which a flexible part such as a wire harness or a hose that swings or causes relative movement is predicted, and a gap or an interference degree is measured between the areas. Can detect interference problems due to rocking and relative motion that could not be detected. By doing so, it is possible to detect the problem of interference due to relative motion at the stage of virtual trial manufacture, so it is possible to reduce problems that occur when a real vehicle is prototyped. In addition, since the movable area is automatically examined, it is possible to reduce the examination process involving humans and to eliminate leakage due to an error during examination.

以上説明したように、本発明のワイヤハーネスの評価方法は、評価対象である柔軟物部品の情報を呼び出すステップと、干渉要件の格納されたデータベースを呼び出すステップと、自部品及び相手部品の可動エリアを予測するステップと、自部品及び相手部品の可動エリア同士の隙間を算出するステップと、算出された隙間を干渉要件データと比較するステップを含むことにより可動エリアが自動的に検討されるものであり、その主旨を逸脱しない範囲内において様々な形態で実施することができる。   As described above, the method for evaluating a wire harness according to the present invention includes a step of calling information on a flexible part to be evaluated, a step of calling a database storing interference requirements, and a movable area of the own part and the counterpart part. The movable area is automatically considered by including a step of predicting the gap, a step of calculating a gap between the movable areas of the own part and the counterpart part, and a step of comparing the calculated gap with the interference requirement data. The present invention can be implemented in various forms without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

本発明の柔軟物部品の干渉解析装置を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the interference analysis apparatus of the flexible article components of this invention. 本発明の柔軟物部品の干渉解析方法を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the interference analysis method of the flexible component of this invention. 自動車のボンネット内を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the inside of the hood of a motor vehicle. 従来例の柔軟物部品の干渉解析方法を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the interference analysis method of the flexible parts of a prior art example. 干渉要件データベースを示す表である。It is a table | surface which shows an interference requirement database.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 ボンネット
2 ホース
3 ワイヤハーネス
4 入力部
5 ディスプレイ
6 CPU
7 記憶部
B バッテリー
w 隙
1 Bonnet 2 Hose 3 Wire harness 4 Input unit 5 Display 6 CPU
7 Memory B Battery w Space

Claims (2)

自部品を選択し入力するための入力部と、
各種の自部品と各種の他部品との間に必要な間隔の干渉要件データベース及び部品のデータベースを格納する記憶部と、
上記入力部によって入力された自部品及び上記他部品の種類の判別を行い、上記データベースから呼び出した情報に基づいて上記自部品として基端が拘束される柔軟物部品の可動エリアと上記他部品として基端が拘束される柔軟物部品の可動エリアとを予測しこれらの柔軟物部品の可動エリア同士の隙の計測を行い、この計測結果と干渉要件データベースにおける上記自部品及び上記他部品の間で必要な間隔とを比較する処理手段と、
上記処理手段による比較結果を表示する表示部と、
を備えることを特徴とする、柔軟物部品の干渉解析装置。
An input section for selecting and entering the own parts;
A storage unit for storing an interference requirement database and a database of parts at necessary intervals between various self-parts and various other parts ;
The type of the self part and the other part input by the input unit is determined, and based on the information called from the database , the movable area of the flexible part whose base end is constrained as the self part and the other part predicting a moving area of the flexible object part base end is restrained during these perform measurement of gap between the movable area of the flexible object components, the self-components and the other components in the measurement result and interference requirements database Processing means for comparing the required interval with
A display unit for displaying a comparison result by the processing means;
An apparatus for analyzing interference of flexible parts, comprising:
前記他部品が前記入力部によって入力されることを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の干渉解析装置。The interference analysis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the other component is input by the input unit.
JP2008096651A 2008-04-02 2008-04-02 Interference analyzer for flexible parts Expired - Fee Related JP4997642B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008096651A JP4997642B2 (en) 2008-04-02 2008-04-02 Interference analyzer for flexible parts

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008096651A JP4997642B2 (en) 2008-04-02 2008-04-02 Interference analyzer for flexible parts

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009251770A JP2009251770A (en) 2009-10-29
JP4997642B2 true JP4997642B2 (en) 2012-08-08

Family

ID=41312448

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008096651A Expired - Fee Related JP4997642B2 (en) 2008-04-02 2008-04-02 Interference analyzer for flexible parts

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4997642B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9177097B2 (en) * 2012-05-08 2015-11-03 The Boeing Company Aircraft wiring layout verification system
JP7399735B2 (en) 2020-02-05 2023-12-18 東日本旅客鉄道株式会社 Evaluation support device, evaluation support method, and evaluation support program

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004126820A (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-22 Fujitsu Fip Corp Layout design support system and method
JP4606280B2 (en) * 2004-10-04 2011-01-05 シャープ株式会社 Linear component interference verification apparatus, verification method thereof, linear component design apparatus having linear component interference verification function, and design method thereof
JP2006301953A (en) * 2005-04-20 2006-11-02 Sharp Corp Design verification device, design verification method, design verification program, and recording medium with the same recorded
JP4867457B2 (en) * 2006-04-25 2012-02-01 日産自動車株式会社 Drive belt drawing system and drive belt drawing method
JP2007310660A (en) * 2006-05-18 2007-11-29 Toyota Motor Corp Piping movable range prediction device, piping movable range prediction method, and piping movable dimension prediction program
JP5035021B2 (en) * 2008-02-28 2012-09-26 富士通株式会社 Design support apparatus, design support method, and design support program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009251770A (en) 2009-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8855823B2 (en) Robot controller, simple installation-type robot, and method of controlling simple installation-type robot
JP4012463B2 (en) Method and apparatus for calculating routing route of control cable
US6839642B2 (en) Flexure life estimating method, wire harness designing method and program thereof
CN106413997A (en) Method for preventing collisions of a robot in a workstation
JP4386294B2 (en) Food Dent Performance Evaluation Method
CA2869968C (en) System and method for prediction of snap-through buckling of formed steel sheet panels
EP3264062A1 (en) Break prediction method, break prediction device, program, recording medium, and break discernment standard calculation method
JP4997642B2 (en) Interference analyzer for flexible parts
WO2014102018A1 (en) Method and apparatus for reduction of co-worker's injury
US8447572B2 (en) Assembling manipulability evaluation apparatus, method, and program
KR101588263B1 (en) Method and apparatus for identifying effect of countermeasure for reducing springback on press-formed product
EP2249123A1 (en) Surface texture measuring device, surface texture measuring method, and program
JP4494323B2 (en) Fracture evaluation method, break evaluation program and break evaluation apparatus for plate material
JP4407906B2 (en) Path tolerance evaluation device for linear flexible objects
CN114254536A (en) Simulation prediction method and system for automobile interior friction abnormal sound
Balla et al. Incommensurate vibro-acoustic performance due to in-process blank holder force variation during deep drawing process
JPH03108070A (en) Layout analysis cad system for linear object
JP2007310660A (en) Piping movable range prediction device, piping movable range prediction method, and piping movable dimension prediction program
JP7222449B1 (en) BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS METHOD OF PANEL PARTS, APPEARANCE FAILURE PREDICTION METHOD OF AUTOMOTIVE PANEL PARTS, BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS DEVICE, AND BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS PROGRAM
JP2003226230A (en) Product repair supporting device, its method and recording medium recording product repair supporting program
CN116862481B (en) Virtual scene-based vehicle maintenance evaluation method, device and readable storage medium
JP5427765B2 (en) Creep damage diagnostic system for piping system
Bauer et al. FE-simulation method for a flexible clamping technology for Body in White assemblies
JP2010223703A (en) Fitting quality determination method of vehicle body component
JP4815457B2 (en) Automatic examination system for wire harness connection work

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110221

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110322

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110523

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111129

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120126

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120424

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120427

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150525

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150525

Year of fee payment: 3

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150525

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees