JP4918793B2 - Optimal operating condition setting system - Google Patents

Optimal operating condition setting system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4918793B2
JP4918793B2 JP2006067402A JP2006067402A JP4918793B2 JP 4918793 B2 JP4918793 B2 JP 4918793B2 JP 2006067402 A JP2006067402 A JP 2006067402A JP 2006067402 A JP2006067402 A JP 2006067402A JP 4918793 B2 JP4918793 B2 JP 4918793B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
operating condition
optimum
manufacturing
condition
quality
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2006067402A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007241954A (en
Inventor
進一 大和
賢司 竹野谷
克己 猪頭
正貴 宮野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toppan Inc
Original Assignee
Toppan Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toppan Inc filed Critical Toppan Inc
Priority to JP2006067402A priority Critical patent/JP4918793B2/en
Publication of JP2007241954A publication Critical patent/JP2007241954A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4918793B2 publication Critical patent/JP4918793B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Description

本発明は、ロール状形成物の製造工程における運転条件設定システムに関し、製造中に欠陥検査装置や膜厚計等の品質検査装置から収集した品質検査データと、製造装置や付帯装置のセンサー等から収集した運転状態データより品質安定生産状態を判定し、品質安定製造時の運転条件より最適運転条件を算出・登録し、同一品種の製品を製造する際に該当する最適運転条件を製造装置に自動設定する最適運転条件設定システムに関するものである。   The present invention relates to an operating condition setting system in a manufacturing process of a roll-shaped product, from quality inspection data collected from a quality inspection device such as a defect inspection device or a film thickness meter during manufacturing, and a sensor of a manufacturing device or an auxiliary device. Judge the stable production status from the collected operation status data, calculate and register the optimum operating conditions from the operating conditions during stable quality production, and automatically apply the optimum operating conditions to the manufacturing equipment when manufacturing the same type of product. The present invention relates to an optimum operating condition setting system to be set.

従来、ロール状形成物の製造工程において、製品製造前に、実際に製造装置を運転させ、ロール状形成物品質状態を確認しながら運転条件を設定する作業が行われている。しかしながら、このような運転条件の設定方法では、その都度オペレータの手を煩わすことになり、作業が簡略化できないばかりでなく、運転条件を設定するために、膨大な時間と非製品ロール状形成物のコストがかかるという問題があった。   2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in the production process of a roll-shaped product, an operation of actually operating a manufacturing apparatus and setting operating conditions while confirming the quality state of the roll-shaped product is performed before manufacturing a product. However, in such a method for setting operating conditions, the operator's hand is troubled each time, and the work cannot be simplified. There was a problem that it cost.

一方最近では、運転条件を事前に登録しておき、製品製造前に製品の品種毎に登録された運転条件から該当する運転条件を設定することにより、運転条件設定作業負荷の削減に成果が上げられてきている。しかしながら、このような運転条件設定方法では、登録された運転条件が実際の製造装置状態や製品の品質状態を反映した最適な運転条件とはなっていない場合が多く、結局、運転条件設定後に製造装置を運転させ、ロール状形成物の品質状態を確認しながら運転条件を再調整する作業が必要となる(特許文献1参照)。   On the other hand, recently, operating conditions have been registered in advance, and by setting the corresponding operating conditions from the operating conditions registered for each product type before product manufacture, the results of reducing the operating condition setting workload have been achieved. It has been. However, in such operating condition setting methods, the registered operating conditions are often not the optimal operating conditions that reflect the actual manufacturing equipment state or product quality state. It is necessary to operate the apparatus and readjust the operating conditions while confirming the quality state of the roll-shaped product (see Patent Document 1).

以下に先行技術文献を示す。
特開平11−34298号公報
Prior art documents are shown below.
JP-A-11-34298

以上のように、従来の運転条件設定方法では、オペレータの手を煩わせるのみでなく、膨大な段取時間と非製品ロール状形成物のコストがかかるという問題があった。本発明は、前記従来技術の問題を鑑みてなされたものであり、オペレータの手を煩わすことなく最適な運転条件の設定を行なうことができ、もって作業の簡略化、段取時間削減、コスト削減、製品の品質安定化を図ることが可能な最適運転条件設定システムを提供することを目的とする。   As described above, the conventional operating condition setting method has a problem that not only the operator's hand is bothered but also a huge setup time and the cost of the non-product roll-shaped product are required. The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems of the prior art, and can set optimal operating conditions without bothering the operator, thereby simplifying operations, reducing setup time, and reducing costs. An object of the present invention is to provide an optimum operating condition setting system capable of stabilizing product quality.

請求項1記載の発明は、ロール状形成物の製造工程において製造装置の最適運転条件を一括設定する最適運転条件設定システムであって、
製造中に欠陥検査装置や膜厚計等の品質検査装置から収集した品質検査データと、製造装置や付帯装置のセンサー等から収集した運転状態データより品質安定製造状態を自動的に判定する品質安定製造状態判定手段と、
前記品質安定製造状態時に、製造装置の運転条件を最適運転条件候補として記録する最適運転条件候補記録手段と、
製造完了時に、前記最適運転条件候補の中から最適運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出手段と、
前記最適運転条件算出手段によって算出された最適運転条件を、仕様書番号等の製品情報と結びつけて登録する最適運転条件登録手段と、
前記最適運転条件登録手段によって登録された最適運転条件より、同一品種の製品を製造時に製品情報より最適運転条件を検索し、製造装置に自動設定する最適運転条件設定手段とを有することを特徴とする最適運転条件設定システムである。
The invention according to claim 1 is an optimum operation condition setting system that collectively sets optimum operation conditions of a production apparatus in a production process of a roll-shaped product,
Quality stability automatically judged from the quality inspection data collected from quality inspection equipment such as defect inspection equipment and film thickness meter during manufacturing, and operation status data collected from sensors of manufacturing equipment and auxiliary equipment Quality stability Manufacturing state determination means;
Optimal operating condition candidate recording means for recording the operating condition of the manufacturing apparatus as the optimal operating condition candidate during the quality stable manufacturing state ;
An optimum operating condition calculating means for calculating an optimum operating condition from the optimum operating condition candidates when the manufacture is completed;
Optimal operation condition registration means for registering the optimum operation condition calculated by the optimum operation condition calculation means in association with product information such as a specification number,
The optimum operation condition setting means for retrieving the optimum operation condition from the product information at the time of manufacturing the same type of product from the optimum operation condition registered by the optimum operation condition registration means, and automatically setting in the manufacturing apparatus. This is an optimal operating condition setting system.

本発明は、ロール状形成物の製造工程における最適運転条件を、製造中に欠陥検査装置や膜厚計等の品質検査装置から収集した品質検査データと、製造装置や付帯装置のセンサー等から収集した運転モニタデータより判定した品質安定製造状態の運転条件より最適運転条件を自動算出・登録でき、同一品種の製品を製造する際、製品情報より最適運転条件を検索し、製造装置に設定できるようにしたもので、オペレータの手を煩わすことなく、最適プリセット条件の設定を正確でかつ迅速に行うことができ、もって作業の簡略化、段取時間削減、コスト削減、製品の品質安定化を図ることが可能な最適運転条件設定システムを提供できる。   The present invention collects the optimum operating conditions in the production process of a roll-shaped product from quality inspection data collected from a quality inspection device such as a defect inspection device and a film thickness meter during production, and from sensors of the production device and auxiliary devices. The optimum operating conditions can be automatically calculated and registered from the operating conditions of the stable quality manufacturing state determined from the operation monitoring data that has been determined, and when manufacturing the same product type, the optimum operating conditions can be searched from the product information and set in the manufacturing equipment. This makes it possible to set the optimal preset conditions accurately and quickly without bothering the operator, thus simplifying operations, reducing setup time, reducing costs, and stabilizing product quality. It is possible to provide an optimum operating condition setting system that can be used.

以下、図面を参照して本発明の詳細を説明する。ただし、以下の内容は一つの実施の形態及び例であり、以下の内容に限定されるものではない。   Hereinafter, details of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. However, the following content is one embodiment and example, and is not limited to the following content.

図1に示すように、本発明の最適運転条件設定システムは、製造装置の各ユニット及び付帯装置(10〜13)の運転状態データ(ライン速度、塗工液の粘度、オーブンの炉内温度等)を各ユニット及び付帯装置(10〜13)に取り付けられた各種センサー等で計測し、運転状態データ(14)として得る。   As shown in FIG. 1, the optimum operating condition setting system of the present invention includes operating state data (line speed, coating solution viscosity, oven furnace temperature, etc.) of each unit of the manufacturing apparatus and auxiliary devices (10-13). ) Is measured by various sensors attached to each unit and the accompanying devices (10 to 13), and obtained as operation state data (14).

また、製造装置(10〜13)により製造されたロール状形成物の品質状態を欠陥検査装置(20)や膜厚計(21)等の品質検査装置で検査し、品質検査データ(22)として得る。   Moreover, the quality state of the roll-shaped formed product manufactured by the manufacturing apparatus (10-13) is inspected by a quality inspection apparatus such as a defect inspection apparatus (20) or a film thickness meter (21), and as quality inspection data (22) obtain.

また、製造装置の各ユニット及び付帯装置(10〜13)の運転条件(各ユニットのテンション、オーブンのブロワ回転数等)を製造装置の各ユニット及び付帯装置(10〜13)より運転条件(15)として得る。   In addition, the operating conditions (15 of each unit and the accessory devices (10 to 13) of the manufacturing apparatus and the accessory devices (10 to 13) are changed to the operating conditions (15 ) Get as.

以上により得られた運転状態データ(14)、運転条件(15)、品質検査データ(22)は、処理装置(30)に送られる。処理装置(30)では、運転状態データ(14)と品質検査データ(22)より最適運転条件算出処理が行われる。   The operating state data (14), operating conditions (15), and quality inspection data (22) obtained as described above are sent to the processing device (30). In the processing device (30), an optimum operation condition calculation process is performed from the operation state data (14) and the quality inspection data (22).

続いて、図1及び図2を用いて最適運転条件算出処理の流れを説明する。
まず、製造装置の各ユニット及び付帯装置(10〜13)の運転状態データ(14)、品質検査データ(22)、運転条件(15)のモニタリング(ステップ1)を行い、運転状態データ(14)のライン速度が予め入力されたライン速度判定値以上であるかライン速度チェック(ステップ2)を行う。
Next, the flow of the optimum operating condition calculation process will be described using FIG. 1 and FIG.
First, the operation state data (14), the quality inspection data (22), and the operation condition (15) of each unit of the manufacturing apparatus and the auxiliary devices (10 to 13) are monitored (step 1), and the operation state data (14). A line speed check (step 2) is performed to determine whether the line speed is equal to or higher than a line speed judgment value input in advance.

ライン速度チェックの結果、ライン速度がライン速度判定値以下であった場合、繰り返しライン速度チェック、すなわちステップ1、2を行う。   As a result of the line speed check, if the line speed is less than or equal to the line speed determination value, the line speed check is repeated, that is, Steps 1 and 2 are performed.

ここで、ライン速度チェックの結果、ライン速度がライン速度判定値以上であった場合、ステップ1で取得した運転状態データ(14)、品質検査データ(22)と予め入力された各データの目標値との比較演算を行い、目標値との差が許容範囲内にあるかどうかの品質安定製造状態チェック(ステップ3)を行う。ここでいう、許容範囲とは任意定めたものである。   Here, as a result of the line speed check, if the line speed is equal to or higher than the line speed determination value, the operation state data (14) and quality inspection data (22) acquired in step 1 and the target values of each data input in advance The quality stable manufacturing state check (step 3) is performed to determine whether the difference from the target value is within the allowable range. The allowable range here is arbitrarily defined.

品質安定製造状態チェックの結果、運転状態データ(14)、品質検査データ(22)が許容範囲内でなければ、新たに運転状態データ(14)、品質検査データ(22)、運転条件(15)のモニタリング(ステップ1)、ライン速度チェック(ステップ2)を行い、品質安定製造状態条件を満たすまで繰り返し品質安定製造状態チェック(ステップ3)を行う。   As a result of the quality stable manufacturing state check, if the operation state data (14) and the quality inspection data (22) are not within the allowable range, the operation state data (14), the quality inspection data (22), and the operation condition (15) are newly added. Monitoring (step 1) and line speed check (step 2), and repeatedly performing a stable quality manufacturing state check (step 3) until the stable quality manufacturing state condition is satisfied.

品質安定製造状態チェックの結果、各種運転状態データ(14)、品質検査データ(22)が許容範囲内であれば、品質安定製造状態時の運転条件(15)を最適運転条件(16)の候補としてデータベース等の記録装置(34)に記録する(ステップ4)。   As a result of the quality stable manufacturing state check, if various operating state data (14) and quality inspection data (22) are within the allowable range, the operating condition (15) in the stable quality manufacturing state is a candidate for the optimum operating condition (16). Is recorded in a recording device (34) such as a database (step 4).

また、運転状態データ(14)の軸選択信号により軸切替チェック(ステップ5)を行い、軸切替が発生した場合は、製造完了と判定し製造完了時の処理を行う。軸切替が発生しなかった場合は、繰り返しスタートからチェックを行う。   In addition, an axis switching check (step 5) is performed based on the axis selection signal of the operation state data (14). If axis switching does not occur, check from the start repeatedly.

製造完了時には、データベース等の記録装置(34)に記録された最適運転条件候補より、各データ項目の中で、予め入力された比較優先度の高い項目から順番に、目標値との比較演算を行い、最適運転条件(16)を算出する(ステップ6)。   When the manufacture is completed, comparison operations with target values are performed in order from items with higher priority of comparison input in advance in each data item from candidates for optimum operating conditions recorded in the recording device (34) such as a database. The optimum operating condition (16) is calculated (step 6).

ここで算出された最適運転条件(16)には、製品情報をヘッダー情報として付加し、最適運転条件(16)としてデータベース等の記録装置(34)に登録する。   Product information is added to the optimum operating condition (16) calculated here as header information, and the optimum operating condition (16) is registered in a recording device (34) such as a database.

続いて、図1を用いて、最適運転条件設定処理フローの流れを説明する。
まず、製造開始前に、入力装置(32)に次製品の製造条件取得信号(36)を入力することで、事前に上位システム(31)に設定された作業指示情報に基づき、次に製造する製品の製品情報(35)を自動的に取得する。
Subsequently, the flow of the optimum operation condition setting process flow will be described with reference to FIG.
First, before the start of manufacturing, a manufacturing condition acquisition signal (36) of the next product is input to the input device (32), and then manufacturing is performed based on work instruction information set in advance in the host system (31). Product information (35) of the product is automatically acquired.

製品情報(35)が自動設定されると、続いて製品情報(35)の中の仕様書番号等の品種情報を検索キーとして、データベース等の記録装置(34)に最適運転条件(16)の検索を実行し該当する最適運転条件(16)がみつかると、自動的に取得する。取得した最適運転条件(16)は、表示装置(33)に表示され、オペレータが確認後、生産開始のタイミングで入力装置(32)に生産スタート信号を入力することで、表示された最適運転条件データ(37)が、製造装置の各ユニット及び付帯装置(10〜13)に一括で自動設定される。   When the product information (35) is automatically set, the product information such as the specification number in the product information (35) is then used as a search key to set the optimum operating condition (16) in the recording device (34) such as a database. When the search is executed and the corresponding optimum operating condition (16) is found, it is automatically acquired. The acquired optimum operating condition (16) is displayed on the display device (33), and after the operator confirms it, the production start signal is input to the input device (32) at the production start timing. Data (37) is automatically set in a batch for each unit of the manufacturing apparatus and the accompanying devices (10 to 13).

本発明の最適運転条件設定システムを備えた製造装置の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the manufacturing apparatus provided with the optimal operating condition setting system of this invention. 本発明の最適運転条件算出処理フロー図である。It is an optimal driving | running condition calculation process flowchart of this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 製造装置の巻出ユニット及び付帯装置
11 製造装置の塗工ユニット及び付帯装置
12 製造装置の乾燥ユニット及び付帯装置
13 製造装置の巻取ユニット及び付帯装置
14 運転状態データ
15 運転条件
16 最適運転条件
20 欠陥検査装置
21 膜厚計
22 品質検査データ
30 処理装置
31 上位システム
32 入力装置
33 表示装置
34 記録装置
35 製品情報
36 次製品の製造条件取得信号、生産スタート信号
37 最適運転条件データ
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Unwinding unit and incidental apparatus 11 of manufacturing apparatus Coating unit and incidental apparatus 12 of manufacturing apparatus Drying unit and incidental apparatus 13 of manufacturing apparatus Winding unit and incidental apparatus 14 of manufacturing apparatus Operating state data 15 Operating condition 16 Optimal operating condition 20 Defect inspection device 21 Film thickness meter 22 Quality inspection data 30 Processing device 31 Host system 32 Input device 33 Display device 34 Recording device 35 Product information 36 Production condition acquisition signal for next product, production start signal 37 Optimal operating condition data

Claims (1)

ロール状形成物の製造工程において製造装置の最適運転条件を一括設定する最適運転条件設定システムであって、
製造中に欠陥検査装置や膜厚計等の品質検査装置から収集した品質検査データと、製造装置や付帯装置のセンサー等から収集した運転状態データより品質安定製造状態を自動的に判定する品質安定製造状態判定手段と、
前記品質安定製造状態時に、製造装置の運転条件を最適運転条件候補として記録する最適運転条件候補記録手段と、
製造完了時に、前記最適運転条件候補の中から最適運転条件を算出する最適運転条件算出手段と、
前記最適運転条件算出手段によって算出された最適運転条件を、仕様書番号等の製品情報と結びつけて登録する最適運転条件登録手段と、
前記最適運転条件登録手段によって登録された最適運転条件より、同一品種の製品を製造時に製品情報より最適運転条件を検索し、製造装置に自動設定する最適運転条件設定手段とを有することを特徴とする最適運転条件設定システム。

An optimum operating condition setting system that collectively sets optimum operating conditions of a manufacturing apparatus in a manufacturing process of a roll-shaped product,
Quality stability automatically judged from the quality inspection data collected from quality inspection equipment such as defect inspection equipment and film thickness meter during manufacturing, and operation status data collected from sensors of manufacturing equipment and auxiliary equipment Quality stability Manufacturing state determination means;
Optimal operating condition candidate recording means for recording the operating condition of the manufacturing apparatus as the optimal operating condition candidate during the quality stable manufacturing state ;
An optimum operating condition calculating means for calculating an optimum operating condition from the optimum operating condition candidates when the manufacture is completed;
Optimal operation condition registration means for registering the optimum operation condition calculated by the optimum operation condition calculation means in association with product information such as a specification number,
The optimum operation condition setting means for retrieving the optimum operation condition from the product information at the time of manufacturing the same type of product from the optimum operation condition registered by the optimum operation condition registration means, and automatically setting in the manufacturing apparatus. Optimal operating condition setting system.

JP2006067402A 2006-03-13 2006-03-13 Optimal operating condition setting system Expired - Fee Related JP4918793B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006067402A JP4918793B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2006-03-13 Optimal operating condition setting system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006067402A JP4918793B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2006-03-13 Optimal operating condition setting system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007241954A JP2007241954A (en) 2007-09-20
JP4918793B2 true JP4918793B2 (en) 2012-04-18

Family

ID=38587386

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006067402A Expired - Fee Related JP4918793B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2006-03-13 Optimal operating condition setting system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4918793B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11693395B2 (en) * 2018-12-18 2023-07-04 Mimaki Engineering Co., Ltd. Production management system, production management program, production quantity management system, and production quantity management program
EP3995917A4 (en) * 2019-07-03 2022-08-03 FUJIFILM Corporation Optimization support device, method, and program
JP7107449B1 (en) * 2021-03-01 2022-07-27 三菱電機株式会社 PRODUCTION LINE CONTROL DEVICE, PRODUCTION LINE CONTROL METHOD, AND PRODUCTION LINE CONTROL SYSTEM

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10193240A (en) * 1997-01-08 1998-07-28 Toray Ind Inc Manufacturing condition control device, manufacturing condition change processing method and storage medium
JP2005196484A (en) * 2004-01-07 2005-07-21 Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd Production management system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007241954A (en) 2007-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2017094472A1 (en) Management system and management program
JP2008269261A5 (en)
US20220091597A1 (en) Analysis system and analysis method
JP4918793B2 (en) Optimal operating condition setting system
CN113609790B (en) Product virtual measuring method, system, device and medium
JP4957406B2 (en) Batch process analysis system and batch process analysis method
JP6200794B2 (en) Monitor device
TWI617906B (en) Bi-directional association and graphical acquisition of time-based equipment sensor data and material-based metrology statistical process control data
JP5017176B2 (en) Manufacturing instruction evaluation support system, manufacturing instruction evaluation support method, and manufacturing instruction evaluation support program
CN112246469B (en) Method and apparatus for controlling spray coating of vehicle
US20090265027A1 (en) Server device and program
TWI637250B (en) Intelligent processing modulation system and method
JP2018165893A (en) Work support device, work support method, and work support program
JP5745981B2 (en) Semiconductor chip test method and semiconductor chip test apparatus
JP2010101721A (en) Method and apparatus for inspecting tire structure member on molding drum
WO2007129567A1 (en) Server device, and program
JP6922239B2 (en) Process monitoring device, control method and program of process monitoring device
JP2017156337A (en) Device and method for integrating and managing optical film defect information
JP2005338906A (en) Defect detection method for substrate and defect detection system therefor
JP5824550B1 (en) Data management apparatus and data management program
US20190114597A1 (en) Methods for predictive estimation of repair lines based on historical data and devices thereof
CN108548611A (en) Multichannel temperature method for inspecting and logging for environmental test chamber detection
JP2019012321A (en) Information processing device, process time calculation method and process time calculation program
JP5278082B2 (en) Simulation system
JP2007079933A (en) Production information processing method, program for making computer execute it, and production information management system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090227

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110419

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110614

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120104

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120117

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150210

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees