JP4904724B2 - Analysis program, analysis method, and analysis apparatus - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an analysis program and the like .

  Conventionally, a program creator (hereinafter simply referred to as a creator) needs to detect a problem location that exists in the program after the program is created and prevent problems that may occur when the program is executed. was there.

  Therefore, the creator analyzes the program using a program analysis tool or the like disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1, identifies the problem location using the analysis result, and corrects the problem location. It was.

  However, since the program analysis tool disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1 notifies the creator without selecting all analysis results, there is a problem that the burden on the creator is large. This is because even if the analysis result is confirmed by the creator that there is no problem in the program before the upgrade, the analysis result confirmed by the creator is not reflected in the analysis result of the program after the upgrade. This is because it was necessary to confirm the result of the analysis once again.

  Therefore, in the invention described in Patent Document 1, the analysis results related to each program before the upgrade are stored in the storage device, and the overlapping portions of the analysis results are omitted based on the stored analysis results. The burden on the creator is reduced by notifying the creator of the analysis result in which the overlapping portion is omitted.

JP 2004-126866 A Fujitsu Limited, [online], [Search May 19, 2005], Internet <URL: http://www.ist.fujitsu.com/core/pgr>

  However, in such a conventional technique, it is necessary to store the analysis results corresponding to the programs of different versions in the storage device, which causes a problem that the amount of data to be stored in the storage device becomes enormous. .

  In addition, since the program is usually upgraded frequently, this problem becomes more serious.

  That is, reducing the amount of analysis result data stored in the storage device and reducing the work load related to the creator's confirmation of the analysis result are extremely important issues.

The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems caused by the prior art, and reduces the amount of analysis result data to be stored in the storage device and reduces the work load involved in confirming the analysis result of the creator. An object is to provide an analysis program, an analysis method, and an analysis apparatus that can be reduced.

To solve the above problems and achieve the object, the present invention causes a computer to detect a first error location is any error part present Oite to the first source code, the first error The second source obtained by storing the information input from the input unit indicating whether there is a problem with respect to the location or the error having no problem in the storage unit, and changing the first source code When a second error location that is the same error as the first error location is detected for the code , the input information and the detected information about the first error location stored in the storage unit are detected. Information indicating the error content of the second error location is associated and displayed on the display unit .

According to the present invention, the amount of data stored in the storage device can be significantly reduced. Moreover, according to this invention, the burden concerning a user's analysis result confirmation operation | work can be reduced.

Exemplary embodiments of an analysis program, an analysis method, and an analysis apparatus according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

  First, the concept of the program analysis apparatus according to the present embodiment will be described. The program analysis apparatus according to the present embodiment integrates confirmation information for program analysis results for different versions, and stores the integrated confirmation result information (hereinafter referred to as integrated confirmation result information) in the storage unit. Here, the confirmation result information is information indicating whether there is a problem in the program analysis result.

  When the analysis result of the new version of the program is output, the program analysis device selects only the analysis result necessary for the user based on the integration confirmation result stored in the storage unit, and outputs the selected analysis result. To do.

  Therefore, the program analysis apparatus according to the present embodiment does not need to store the analysis result for each different program in the storage unit as in the prior art, so that the amount of data stored in the storage unit can be greatly reduced. . Further, since the analysis result necessary for the user is selected and output based on the integration confirmation result information, the burden on the user can be reduced.

  Next, the configuration of the program analysis apparatus according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram illustrating the configuration of the program analysis apparatus according to the present embodiment. As shown in the figure, the program analysis device 60 includes a configuration management unit 70, a storage unit 80, a program analysis unit 90, and a confirmation result suppression unit 100. The program analysis device 60 is connected to an input device 40 such as a keyboard and a mouse and a display device 50 such as a display.

  The configuration management unit 70 is a processing unit that passes the old and new (after version upgrade and before version upgrade) programs or integration confirmation result information stored in the storage unit 80 to the program analysis unit 90 and the confirmation result suppression unit 100. Specifically, the configuration management unit 70 searches for a program to be analyzed from the analysis target program group 80 a stored in the storage unit 80, and passes the searched program to the program analysis unit 90 and the confirmation result suppression unit 100. The program to be searched is specified by the user via the input device 40.

  Here, the storage unit 80 is a storage unit that stores an analysis target program group 80a and integration confirmation result information 80b. The analysis result target program group 80a is a collection of a plurality of programs to be analyzed, and the integration confirmation result information 80b integrates the respective confirmation results for the program analysis results of each version (the overlapping part of each confirmation result information is omitted). Information associated with the identification information of the corresponding program.

  In addition, when the configuration management unit 70 receives a request for the integration confirmation result information 80b from the confirmation result suppression unit 100, the version corresponding to the integration confirmation result information 80b and the integration confirmation result information 80b stored in the storage unit 80. The pre-up program is passed to the confirmation result suppression unit 100.

  The program analysis unit 90 is a processing unit that analyzes the program acquired from the configuration management unit 70 and passes the analysis result of the analyzed program to the confirmation result suppression unit 100.

  The confirmation result suppression unit 100 acquires the analysis result of the program and the integrated confirmation result information 80b, selects an analysis result to be output based on the acquired information, and outputs the selected analysis result to the display device 50. It is a processing unit.

  The analysis results to be output include the analysis results other than the analysis results determined to have no problem in the program before the upgrade, or the analysis results not associated with the confirmation result information related to the program before the upgrade To do.

  As described above, when the analysis result of the program is acquired from the program analysis unit 90, the confirmation result suppressing unit 100 does not output all the acquired analysis results to the display device 50, but based on the integrated confirmation result 80b. Since the analysis result other than the analysis result determined not to have a problem in the program before the upgrade or the analysis result not associated with the confirmation result information related to the program before the upgrade is selected and output, the user's analysis The burden on the result confirmation work can be greatly reduced.

  Next, the configuration of the confirmation result suppression unit 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 will be described. FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram illustrating a configuration of the confirmation result suppressing unit 100 illustrated in FIG. As shown in the figure, the confirmation result suppression unit 100 includes a management unit 110, a position information table creation unit 120, a position information table storage unit 130, an analysis result editing unit 140, an analysis result display unit 150, and a confirmation result acquisition unit 160. And a confirmation result integration unit 170.

  The management unit 110 is a processing unit that manages the entire confirmation result control unit 100. Specifically, when the analysis unit 110 acquires an analysis request related to a predetermined program from the input device 40, the management unit 110 notifies the configuration management unit 70 of information on the program corresponding to the analysis request. Then, the management unit 110 acquires the integration confirmation result information 80b, the program before the upgrade, and the analysis target program from the configuration management unit 70, and acquires the analysis result of the program corresponding to the analysis request from the program analysis unit 90. .

  The management unit 110 passes the acquired integration confirmation result information 80b to the analysis result editing unit 140 and the confirmation result integration unit 170, and stores the analysis target program and the program related to the analysis target program before the upgrade. The program analysis result is passed to the creation unit 120 and the program analysis result is passed to the analysis result editing unit 140.

  The position information table creation unit 120 creates a position information table based on the analysis target program and the program related to the analysis target program before upgrading, and stores the created position information table in the position information table storage unit 130. A processing unit to be stored. Here, the position information table storage unit 130 is a storage unit that stores a position information table. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the position information table created by the position information table creating unit 120.

  As shown in FIG. 3, this position information table includes “file name”, “position before change (line number)”, and “position after change (line number)”. Specifically, the file name “/ usr / home / ac” on the “1” line before the change has been changed to the “2” line after the change, and the “2” line before the change. This indicates that the file name ““ / usr / home / ac ”” has changed to the “2” line after the change. The description regarding other position information tables is omitted.

  Returning to the description of FIG. 2, the analysis result editing unit 140 acquires the integration confirmation result information 80b and the program analysis result from the management unit 110, and acquires the position information table from the position information table storage unit 130. A processing unit that selects an optimal analysis result and passes the selected analysis result to the analysis result display unit 150. The analysis result display unit 150 is a processing unit that causes the display device 50 to display the analysis result acquired from the analysis result editing unit 140.

  The confirmation result acquisition unit 160 is a processing unit that passes the acquired confirmation result to the confirmation result integration unit 170 as confirmation result information when the confirmation result related to the analysis result of the program is acquired from the input device 40.

  The confirmation result integration unit 170 is a processing unit that integrates the integration confirmation result information 80b acquired from the management unit 110 and the confirmation result information acquired from the confirmation result acquisition unit 160 to create new integration confirmation result information. In addition, the confirmation result integration unit 170 passes the created integration confirmation result information to the management unit 110. The management unit 110 associates the integration confirmation result information acquired from the confirmation result integration unit 70 with the analysis target program and passes it to the configuration management unit 70, and the configuration management unit 70 updates the integration confirmation result information 80b.

  Next, processing when the program analysis apparatus 60 according to the present embodiment analyzes the first version program will be described. FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a process when the program analysis apparatus 60 according to the present embodiment analyzes the first version program.

  As shown in the figure, in the program analysis device 60, the configuration management unit 70 acquires the first version of the program from the analysis target program group 80a (step S101), and passes the acquired program to the program analysis unit 90 (step S102).

  Then, the program analysis unit 90 analyzes the acquired program (step S103), passes the analysis result of the program to the confirmation result suppression unit 100 (step S104), and displays the analysis result acquired by the confirmation result suppression unit 100 on the display device 50. (Step S105).

  Subsequently, the confirmation result suppressing unit 100 accepts the confirmation result from the input device 40 (step S106), creates the accepted confirmation result as integration confirmation result information (step S107), and corresponds to the created integration confirmation result information. The program is passed to the configuration management unit 70 (step S108), and the configuration management unit 70 associates the integration confirmation result information with the program and registers them in the storage unit 80 (step S109).

  FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a display screen related to the analysis result of the first version program displayed on the display device 50 in step S105 of FIG. As shown in the figure, the display screen includes “definite”, “file name”, “line number”, “ID”, “message”, “pattern”, “comment”, and “update date”.

  Here, “file name” is the name of the file to be analyzed, “line number” is the line number of the file corresponding to the file name, and “ID (Identification)” is the specific analysis result “Message” is a message of an analysis result for each file name, and “Pattern” is a pattern ID for classifying different arguments existing in the same ID. For example, the first line, the third line, and the fourth line from the top have the same ID “102”, but since the arguments are different, the pattern is set to “102_3, 102_1, 102_2” to distinguish them.

  “Comment” is a column in which the reason of the confirmation result for each analysis result is input by the user, and “Update date” indicates the date when each piece of information was updated. In “certain”, a confirmation result as to whether or not there is a problem in each analysis result is input by the user. For example, the file name “/ usr / home / ac”, the line number “1”, the ID “102”, the message “The argument“ c ”is not used in the macro definition”, and the pattern “102_3” If it is determined that there is a problem, the user inputs “x (problem)” in the “accuracy” field, and if it is determined that there is no problem, “○ (no problem)” in the “accuracy” field. Is entered. Note that the display screen shown in FIG. 5 is created by the analysis result display unit 150 shown in FIG.

  Next, processing when the program analysis apparatus 60 according to the present embodiment analyzes a program after revision (after version upgrade) will be described. FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a process when the program analysis apparatus 60 according to the present embodiment analyzes the revised program.

  As shown in FIG. 6, in the program analysis device 60, the configuration management unit 70 acquires a revised program designated by the user from the analysis target program group 80a (step S201), and the acquired program is stored in the program analysis unit 90. The program analysis unit 90 analyzes the program (step S203), and passes the analysis result of the program to the confirmation result suppression unit 100 (step S204).

  Then, the confirmation result suppression unit 100 receives the version data (program information before upgrading) to be compared from the input device 40 (step S205), and passes the version data to the configuration management unit 70 (step S206). The configuration management unit 70 acquires the program corresponding to the version data and the integration confirmation result information from the storage unit 80, and passes the acquired information to the confirmation result suppression unit 100 (step S207).

  Subsequently, the location information table creation unit 120 compares the program before the revision with the program after the revision, creates a location information table, and stores the created location information table in the location information table storage unit 130. In step S208, the analysis result editing unit 140 converts the position information of the integration confirmation result information based on the position information table (step S209).

  Then, the analysis result editing unit 140 performs analysis result editing processing (step S210), the analysis result display unit 150 performs analysis result display processing (step S211), and the confirmation result acquisition unit 160 receives the confirmation result from the input device ( In step S212, confirmation result information is created, and the created confirmation result information is passed to the confirmation result integration unit 170 (step S213).

  Subsequently, the confirmation result integration unit 170 performs confirmation result information integration processing (step S214), passes the integrated confirmation result information and the corresponding program to the configuration management unit 70 (step S215), and the configuration management unit 70 integrates them. The confirmed result information and the program are associated and stored in the storage unit 80 (step S216).

  Next, the analysis result editing process shown in step S210 of FIG. 6 will be described. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the analysis result editing process shown in step S210 of FIG. As shown in the figure, the confirmation result suppressing unit 100 determines whether or not the analysis result editing unit 140 has completed comparison with respect to all analysis results (step S301), and if completed (step S302, Yes), the analysis result editing process is terminated.

  On the other hand, if not completed (No at Step S302), an analysis result is selected (Step S303), and it is determined whether or not integration confirmation result information corresponding to the selected analysis result exists (Step S304). .

  If the corresponding integration confirmation result information does not exist (No at Step S305), the analysis result confirmation item is set to a blank (Step S306), and the process proceeds to Step S301.

  On the other hand, when the corresponding integrated confirmation result information exists (step S305, Yes), the analysis result and the confirmation result information are compared (step S307), and it is determined whether there is a problem (step S308).

  If there is a problem (No in step S308), the confirmation item of the analysis result is set to x (there is a problem) (step S309), and the process proceeds to step S301. On the other hand, if there is no problem (step S308, Yes), the check item of the analysis result is set to ○ (no problem) (step S310), and the process proceeds to step S301.

  Next, the analysis result display process shown in step S211 of FIG. 6 will be described. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the analysis result display process shown in step S211 of FIG. As shown in the figure, in the confirmation result suppressing unit 100, the analysis result display unit 150 acquires the edited analysis result and the integrated confirmation result information from the analysis result editing unit 140 (step S401), and the acquired analysis result and The integration confirmation result information is analyzed (step S402).

  Then, the analysis result display unit 150 substitutes the confirmation result (◯, ×, blank) according to the analysis result into the confirmation information field of the form (step S403), and the file name, line number, comment, and date are entered in the form field. (Step S404).

  Subsequently, the analysis result display unit 150 checks the ID and message, determines whether or not the past pattern is matched (step S405), and if the past pattern is matched (step S406, Yes), A corresponding pattern is substituted into the pattern field of the form (step S407).

  On the other hand, if it does not match the past pattern (No at Step S406), a new pattern is created (Step S408), and the created new pattern is substituted into the pattern column of the form (Step S409).

  FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a display screen that the analysis result display unit 150 displays on the display device 50 by the analysis result display process shown in S211 of FIG. As shown in the figure, this display screen includes “old Ver.”, “Certain”, “file name”, “line number”, “ID”, “message”, “pattern”, “comment”, “update”. Date ". Note that the descriptions regarding “accuracy”, “file name”, “line number”, “ID”, “message”, “pattern”, and “comment” are the same as those described in FIG. .

  Here, “old Ver.” Stores information indicating whether or not the analysis result before the upgrade is determined to have a problem. Specifically, it can be seen that the file name “/usr/home/a.c” in the first row from the top was determined as “◯ (no problem)” before the version upgrade.

  For “certain”, the user determines that there is no problem based on the analysis result displayed by the display device 50, and the determination result is input from the input device 40. In FIG. 9, in the first row from the top, “Choice” is “× (problem)” (there was no problem before the upgrade, but there was a problem after the upgrade) .

  Note that the analysis result display unit 150 may display all the analysis results of the program. For example, in “old Ver.”, An analysis result other than “◯ (no problem)” is displayed (in the example of FIG. 9). Other than the first stage may be displayed), or only unconfirmed analysis results may be displayed (in the example of FIG. 9, the second, fourth, seventh, eighth, and ninth stages are displayed).

  In this way, by setting the conditions of the analysis result to be displayed on the analysis result display unit 150 in advance, the user does not need to check the analysis result confirmed in the past again. The burden involved is reduced.

  Next, the confirmation result information integration process shown in step S214 of FIG. 6 will be described. FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the confirmation result information integration process shown in step S214 of FIG. As shown in the figure, the confirmation result suppression unit 100 determines whether or not the confirmation result integration unit 170 has completed all the comparisons between the past integration confirmation result information and the current confirmation result information (step S501). If it has been completed (step S502, Yes), the confirmation result information integration process is terminated.

  On the other hand, if not completed (step S502, No), unselected confirmation result information is selected (step S503), and it is determined whether or not there is integrated confirmation result information corresponding to the selected confirmation result information. If the corresponding integration confirmation result information does not exist (step S505, No), the current confirmation result information is newly added to the integration confirmation result information (step S506), and the process proceeds to step S501. .

  On the other hand, if the corresponding comprehensive confirmation result information exists (step S505, Yes), the integrated confirmation result information is compared with the current confirmation result information (step S507). If the confirmation results are not equal (step S507) In step S508, No), the corresponding part of the current confirmation result information is overwritten (step S509), and the process proceeds to step S501.

  On the other hand, if the confirmation results are equal (step S508, Yes), the corresponding integration confirmation result information is left as it is (step S510), and the process proceeds to step S501.

  Here, the description of steps S506, 509, and 510 will be specifically described with reference to FIG. As shown in the first row from the top of the figure, when “Old Ver.” Is “◯” and “X” is assigned to “Certain”, the confirmation result related to the pattern “102_3” is “X”. To correct.

  Further, as shown in the second row from the top, when “Old Ver.” Is “blank” and “O” is assigned to “Observation”, the confirmation result relating to the pattern “0_1” is set to “O”. To do. As in the third row from the top, when “Old Ver.” Is “x” and “x” is substituted for “certain”, no change is made.

  Thus, since the confirmation result integration unit 170 integrates the past integration confirmation result information and the newly input confirmation result information, the amount of data to be stored in the storage unit 80 can be significantly reduced.

  As described above, in the program analysis device 60 according to the present embodiment, the confirmation result integration unit 170 integrates the confirmation result information of the old and new versions to create integration confirmation result information, and the configuration management unit 70 Integration confirmation result information is stored in the storage unit 80. Then, the program analysis unit 80 analyzes the program, and the analysis result editing unit 140 selects an analysis result to be displayed on the display device 50 based on the integration confirmation result information and the analysis result. The burden on work can be reduced and the amount of data to be stored in the storage unit 80 can be greatly reduced.

  By the way, each process of the program analysis apparatus 60 described in the above embodiment can be realized by executing a program related to the source code analysis process by a computer. In the following, an example of a computer that executes a source code analysis program having the same function as the program analysis device 60 of the above embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a computer that executes a source code analysis program.

  As shown in the figure, the computer 30 is configured by connecting an input device 31, a display device 32, a RAM 33, an HDD 34, a ROM 35 and a CPU 36 via a bus 37. Here, the input device 31 and the display device 32 correspond to the input device 40 and the display device 50 shown in FIG.

  The ROM 35 stores in advance a source code analysis program that exhibits the same function as the program analysis device 60 of the above embodiment, that is, as shown in FIG. 11, a source code analysis program 35a and a confirmation result suppression program 35b. Has been. Note that the programs 35a and 35b may be appropriately integrated or distributed in the same manner as each component of the program analysis apparatus 60 shown in FIG.

  Then, the CPU 36 reads out and executes these programs 35a and 35b from the ROM 35, so that the programs 35a and 35b function as a source code analysis process 36a and a confirmation result suppression process 36b as shown in FIG. It becomes like this. Each process 36a, 36b corresponds to the program analysis unit 90 and the confirmation result suppression unit 100 shown in FIG.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 11, the HDD 34 is provided with an analysis target program group 34a and confirmation result data 34b. The analysis target program group 34a and the confirmation result data 34b correspond to the analysis result target program group 80a and the integrated confirmation result information 80b shown in FIG. 1, respectively. Then, the CPU 36 reads the analysis target program group 34a and the confirmation result data 34b into the RAM 33 and executes source code analysis processing.

  By the way, the above-described programs 35a and 35b do not necessarily need to be stored in the ROM 35 from the beginning. "Portable physical medium" such as a disk or IC card, or "fixed physical medium" such as a hard disk drive (HDD) provided inside or outside the computer 30, and further, a public line, the Internet, LAN, WAN, etc. Each program may be stored in “another computer (or server)” connected to the computer 30 via the computer, and the computer 30 may read and execute each program therefrom.

(Appendix 1) A source code analysis program for analyzing a source code of a program and outputting an analysis result of the source code,
A confirmation result information storage procedure associated with the analysis result of the source code, obtaining confirmation result information indicating whether or not there is a problem with the analysis result, and storing the obtained confirmation result information in a storage device;
Integrated confirmation result information obtained by integrating the confirmation result information stored in the storage device by the confirmation result information storing procedure and the confirmation result information related to the source code before the upgrade, and omitting the overlapping part of the integrated confirmation result information. Confirmation result integration procedure to be generated,
An analysis result output procedure for outputting an analysis result of the source code selected based on the integration confirmation result information;
A source code analysis program for causing a computer to execute.

(Additional remark 2) The said analysis result output procedure is an analysis result other than the analysis result determined that there is no problem in the source code before version upgrade, when outputting the analysis result of a source code based on the said integration confirmation result information The source code analysis program according to appendix 1, wherein:

(Additional remark 3) The said analysis result output procedure outputs the said analysis result, when the analysis result which is not matched with the confirmation result information regarding the source code before a version upgrade exists. The source code analysis program described.

(Appendix 4) A source code analysis method for analyzing a source code of a program and outputting an analysis result of the source code,
A confirmation result information storage step associated with the analysis result of the source code, obtaining confirmation result information indicating whether or not there is a problem with the analysis result, and storing the obtained confirmation result information in a storage device;
Integrated confirmation result information obtained by integrating the confirmation result information stored in the storage device by the confirmation result information storage step and the confirmation result information related to the source code before the upgrade, and omitting the overlapping part of the integrated confirmation result information. Confirmation result integration process to be generated,
An analysis result output step of outputting an analysis result of the source code selected based on the integration confirmation result information;
The source code analysis method characterized by including.

(Additional remark 5) The said analysis result output process WHEREIN: When outputting the analysis result of a source code based on the said integration confirmation result information, the analysis result other than the analysis result determined that there is no problem in the source code before upgrading The source code analysis method according to appendix 4, wherein:

(Additional remark 6) The said analysis result output process outputs the said analysis result, when the analysis result which is not matched with the confirmation result information regarding the source code before a version upgrade exists. The source code analysis method described.

(Supplementary note 7) A source code analyzing apparatus for analyzing a source code of a program and outputting an analysis result of the source code,
Confirmation result information storage means associated with the analysis result of the source code, obtaining confirmation result information indicating whether there is a problem with the analysis result, and storing the obtained confirmation result information;
Confirmation that integrates the confirmation result information stored by the confirmation result information storage means and the confirmation result information related to the source code before the upgrade, and generates integrated confirmation result information in which the overlapping part of the integrated confirmation result information is omitted. Results integration means;
Analysis result output means for outputting an analysis result of the source code selected based on the integration confirmation result information;
A source code analysis apparatus comprising:

(Supplementary Note 8) When the analysis result output unit outputs the analysis result of the source code based on the integration confirmation result information, the analysis result other than the analysis result determined to have no problem in the source code before the upgrade The source code analysis apparatus according to appendix 7, wherein:

(Additional remark 9) The said analysis result output means outputs the said analysis result, when the analysis result which is not matched with the confirmation result information regarding the source code before a version upgrade exists. The source code analysis device described.

It is a functional block diagram which shows the structure of the program analysis apparatus concerning a present Example. It is a functional block diagram which shows the structure of the confirmation result suppression part shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the position information table which a position information table preparation part produces. It is a flowchart which shows the process in case the program-analysis apparatus concerning a present Example analyzes the program of a first edition. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a display screen related to the analysis result of the first version program displayed on the display device in step S105 of FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the process in case the program analysis apparatus concerning a present Example analyzes the program after a revision. It is a flowchart which shows the analysis result edit process shown by step S210 of FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the analysis result display process shown by step S211 of FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the display screen which an analysis result display part displays on a display apparatus by the analysis result display process shown to S211 of FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the confirmation result information integration process shown by step S214 of FIG. It is a figure which shows the computer which executes a source code analysis program.

Explanation of symbols

30 Computer (Program analyzer)
31 Input device 32 Display device 33 RAM
33a, 34a Analysis target program group 33b, 34b Confirmation result data 34 HDD
35 ROM
35a Source code analysis program 35b Confirmation result suppression processing program 36 CPU
36a Source code analysis process 36b Confirmation result suppression processing process 40 Input device 50 Display device 60 Program analysis device 70 Configuration management unit 80 Storage unit 80a Analysis target program group 80b Integration confirmation result information 90 Program analysis unit 100 Confirmation result suppression unit 110 Management unit 120 position information table creation unit 130 position information table storage unit 140 analysis result editing unit 150 analysis result display unit 160 confirmation result acquisition unit 170 confirmation result integration unit

Claims (5)

On the computer,
Detecting a first error location is any error part present Oite to the first source code, or the a first error that the error part issues, indicating which no error problem Input Store the information input from the storage in the storage,
The second source code obtained by changing the first source code is stored in the storage unit when a second error location that is the same error as the first error location is detected. Regarding the first error location, the input information and the information indicating the error content of the detected second error location are associated and displayed on the display unit.
An analysis program characterized by causing In addition to the computer,
When an input related to the detected second error location is received, information input regarding the first error location stored in the storage unit is converted into the second error location based on the received input. Change to the information entered for
The analysis program according to claim 1, wherein the analysis program is executed. In the computer,
The first error location and the location information indicating the location in the first source code where the error location exists are associated and stored in the storage unit,
In response to the change, the position information stored in the storage unit is corrected,
In the second source code, when an error is detected at a location present in the corrected position information, the location is detected as a second error location corresponding to the first error location. To
The analysis program according to claim 1 , wherein the analysis program is executed. The computer detects the first error location, which is all error locations existing in the first source code, and indicates whether the first error location is a problem error or a problem-free error. Store the information input from the input unit in the storage unit,
When the computer detects a second error location that is the same error as the first error location, in the second source code obtained by changing the first source code, the storage unit In relation to the first error location stored in the display , the input information and the information indicating the error content of the detected second error location are associated and displayed on the display unit.
An analysis method characterized by that. Detecting a first error location is any error part present Oite to the first source code, or the a first error that the error part issues, indicating which no error problem Input A storage unit for storing information input from the unit;
The second source code obtained by changing the first source code is stored in the storage unit when a second error location that is the same error as the first error location is detected. A display control unit that associates and displays information input regarding the first error location and information indicating the error content of the detected second error location on the display unit;
The analysis apparatus characterized by including.

Images