JP4705348B2 - Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same - Google Patents

Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4705348B2
JP4705348B2 JP2004235916A JP2004235916A JP4705348B2 JP 4705348 B2 JP4705348 B2 JP 4705348B2 JP 2004235916 A JP2004235916 A JP 2004235916A JP 2004235916 A JP2004235916 A JP 2004235916A JP 4705348 B2 JP4705348 B2 JP 4705348B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
punching
punch
bending blade
die
cutting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2004235916A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005095980A (en
Inventor
雄三 高橋
昌弘 小原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2004235916A priority Critical patent/JP4705348B2/en
Publication of JP2005095980A publication Critical patent/JP2005095980A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4705348B2 publication Critical patent/JP4705348B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Punching Or Piercing (AREA)

Description

本発明は主に、薄鋼板を自動車等の部品などとして用いるために、所定の輪郭に打ち抜く技術に関するものである。   The present invention mainly relates to a technique for punching a steel sheet into a predetermined contour in order to use a thin steel plate as a part of an automobile or the like.

薄鋼板は実使用される際、多くの場合、まず打ち抜き加工により所定の形状とされ、次に成形加工がなされて所定の形状とされた後、溶接工程を経て自動車用部品として組み立てられ用いられる。図1に、従来の打ち抜き工程による材料の変形状態を示すが、図中に示される硬化層に大きな圧縮または引張の歪が加わるため、そこの材料が著しく硬化しこの硬化部の延性の劣化により端面の延性が劣化し、打ち抜き穴の穴広げ性が著しく劣化していた。この硬化層による端面延性劣化は特に高強度鋼で特に激しく、近年自動車軽量化ニーズに対応して多用されるようになった高強度鋼板の成形性はこのために著しく劣化していた。実部品の成形に要求される穴拡げ値は概ね65%程度であり、高強度鋼板においてこの値を上回る穴拡げ値を得ることが軽量化に向けた課題である。   When a thin steel sheet is actually used, in many cases, it is first formed into a predetermined shape by punching, and then formed into a predetermined shape by forming and then assembled and used as an automobile part through a welding process. . FIG. 1 shows a deformation state of a material by a conventional punching process. Since a large compressive or tensile strain is applied to the hardened layer shown in the figure, the material there is remarkably hardened and the ductility of the hardened portion is deteriorated. The ductility of the end face deteriorated, and the hole expansibility of the punched hole was remarkably deteriorated. The end face ductility deterioration due to the hardened layer is particularly severe in high-strength steel, and the formability of high-strength steel sheets that have been frequently used in recent years in response to needs for reducing the weight of automobiles has deteriorated significantly. The hole expansion value required for forming an actual part is approximately 65%, and obtaining a hole expansion value exceeding this value in a high-strength steel sheet is an issue for weight reduction.

打ち抜き後の端面の成形性を改善する打ち抜き技術としては、ポンチ先端部の形状を図2に示すような形状として、一段目の打ち抜き後に発生する切り欠き形状や加工硬化部を削り落とす技術が開発されている(非特許文献1)。しかし、本技術に示されるポンチ形状は複雑な形状をしているため、通常連続した打ち抜きの磨耗対策としてポンチやダイなどの金型に研磨を行った後に再使用する実工程での実用化は困難であった。   As a punching technology to improve the formability of the end face after punching, a technology has been developed in which the shape of the punch tip is shaped as shown in Fig. 2, and the notch shape and work hardening part generated after the first stage punching are scraped off. (Non-Patent Document 1). However, since the punch shape shown in this technology has a complicated shape, it is usually put to practical use in an actual process that is reused after polishing a die such as a punch or die as a countermeasure against wear due to continuous punching. It was difficult.

また、打ち抜きポンチの形状の改善により端面性状を制御する技術として、打ち抜きポンチ先端部に凸状の突起を付け、打ち抜き端面のバリを軽減する技術も報告されている(特許文献1)。
しかし、当該技術による打ち抜き用工具の凸上の突起の形状は、穴広げ性を大きく改善するために好ましいものではない。図3に当該技術を説明する公報で示されるポンチの形状を示すが、その先端部の凸状の突起は、その先端部の肩部が約90度である。この場合、特に高強度鋼板を打ち抜く場合、図4に示すように、突起自体により容易に鋼板が切断されるため、本来切断される部分へ十分な曲げ応力を与えることができない。このため、当該技術では、穴広げ性は大きくは改善しない。
中川威雄、吉田清太:削り抜き法−せん断面の伸び変形能向上策−、塑性と加工、Vol.10,No.10,No.104,P.665〜671(1696.9) 公開特許公報 特開平5−23755
In addition, as a technique for controlling the end face properties by improving the shape of the punching punch, a technique for reducing a burr on the punching end face by attaching a convex protrusion to the tip of the punching punch has been reported (Patent Document 1).
However, the shape of the convex protrusions of the punching tool according to the art is not preferable in order to greatly improve the hole expanding property. FIG. 3 shows the shape of a punch shown in a gazette explaining the technology. The convex protrusion at the tip of the punch has a shoulder at the tip of about 90 degrees. In this case, particularly when a high-strength steel plate is punched out, as shown in FIG. 4, the steel plate is easily cut by the protrusions themselves, so that sufficient bending stress cannot be applied to the originally cut portion. For this reason, in the said technique, hole expansibility does not improve significantly.
Takeo Nakagawa, Kiyota Yoshida: Cutting-out method-Measures to improve the elongation deformability of sheared surfaces-Plasticity and processing, Vol. 10, no. 10, no. 104, P.I. 665-671 (1696.9) Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-23755

本発明は、前述のような従来技術の問題点を解決し、鋼板の打ち抜き穴での穴広げ性を簡便、容易に改善する技術を提供することを課題とする。   An object of the present invention is to solve the above-described problems of the prior art and to provide a technique for easily and easily improving the hole expandability in a punched hole of a steel plate.

発明1は、被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とするための打ち抜き用工具において、ポンチかつ/またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であることを特徴とする打ち抜き用工具である。Invention 1 is a punching tool for making a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch. The punching tool is characterized by having a bending blade having a convex shape at the tip of the cutting blade and having a bending blade shoulder angle of not less than 100 degrees and not more than 170 degrees.
発明2は、被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とするための打ち抜き用工具において、ポンチかつ/またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部の曲率半径が0.2mm以上であり、かつ曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であることを特徴とする打ち抜き用工具である。  Invention 2 is a punching tool for making a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch. The tip of the cutting blade has a bending blade having a convex shape, the curvature radius of the bending blade shoulder is 0.2 mm or more, and the bending blade shoulder angle is 100 degrees or more and 170 degrees or less. It is a punching tool characterized by being.

発明は、被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とする打ち抜き用工程において、ポンチかつ/またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下である打ち抜き用工具を用いることを特徴とする鋼板打ち抜き方法である。
発明は、被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とする打ち抜き用工具において、ポンチかつ/またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部の曲率半径が0.2mm以上であり、かつ曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であることを特徴とする打ち抜き用工具を用いることを特徴とする鋼板打ち抜き方法である。
Invention 3 is a punching and / or die cutting blade in a punching process in which a work material is cut into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate to be processed into a shearing portion and a shearing portion using at least a die and a punch. A steel plate punching method using a punching tool having a bending blade having a convex shape at a tip end portion of the portion and having a bending blade shoulder portion angle of not less than 100 degrees and not more than 170 degrees.
Invention 4 provides a punching tool and / or a die cutting blade in a punching tool for making a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch. A bending blade having a convex shape at the tip of the part, the radius of curvature of the bending blade shoulder is 0.2 mm or more, and the bending blade shoulder angle is 100 degrees or more and 170 degrees or less. A steel plate punching method using a punching tool characterized by the above.

本発明によれば、自動車部品等として高強度鋼板を適用でき、自動車軽量化、ひいては省エネルギーに寄与する。 According to the present invention, a high-strength steel plate can be applied as an automobile part or the like, which contributes to reducing the weight of an automobile and thus saving energy.

本発明者らは、上記課題に鑑み、ポンチ形状を図5に示す曲げ刃Aおよび切刃Bの二段構造とすることにより打ち抜き端面の穴広げ性を改善できることを知見した。
この理由については次のように考えられる。
通常のうち抜きでは、図1に示される、ポンチとダイによる変形が加わる部分(硬化層)に大きな引張りまたは圧縮の歪が加わり、このため、そこが著しく加工硬化するため、端面の延性が劣化し穴広げ性は劣化する。しかし、ポンチ形状を本発明(図5)に示すような切刃Bおよび曲げ刃Aからなる二段構造として、図6のように切刃Bで切断される部分(材料切断部M)に曲げ刃Aにより引張応力を与えた場合は、切刃Bおよびダイ肩より発生した亀裂の進展が引張応力により促進され、材料が圧縮されることなく切刃Bにより切断されるため、穴拡げ性は改善する。
In view of the above problems, the present inventors have found that the punch shape can be improved by making the punch shape a two-stage structure of a bending blade A and a cutting blade B shown in FIG.
The reason is considered as follows.
In the usual case, a large tensile or compressive strain is applied to the portion where the punch and die are deformed (hardened layer) as shown in FIG. 1, and this causes significant work hardening, resulting in a deterioration in end face ductility. The hole spreading ability deteriorates. However, the punch shape is bent into a part (material cutting part M) cut by the cutting blade B as shown in FIG. 6 as a two-stage structure consisting of the cutting blade B and the bending blade A as shown in the present invention (FIG. 5). When tensile stress is applied by the blade A, the crack expansion generated from the cutting blade B and the die shoulder is accelerated by the tensile stress, and the material is cut by the cutting blade B without being compressed. Improve.

更に、本発明者らは、曲げ刃の形状について更に詳細な検討を加え、曲げ刃形状を所定の形状としないと十分な穴拡げ性改善の効果が得られないことを知見した。
即ち、曲げ刃Aの形状が所定形状でない場合、曲げ刃Aにより材料が切断されるため、切り刃Bで切断される部分Mに十分な曲げによる引張応力を与えることができず、良好な穴拡げ性は得られない。しかし、曲げ刃形状を、曲げ刃自体による材料の切断が行われない形状とすることにより良好な穴拡げ性を得ることができることを知見した。
Furthermore, the present inventors have made further detailed studies on the shape of the bending blade, and have found that a sufficient effect of improving the hole expansibility cannot be obtained unless the bending blade has a predetermined shape.
That is, when the shape of the bending blade A is not a predetermined shape, since the material is cut by the bending blade A, a tensile stress due to sufficient bending cannot be applied to the portion M cut by the cutting blade B, and a good hole is obtained. Expandability cannot be obtained. However, it has been found that good hole expansibility can be obtained by making the bending blade shape into a shape in which the material is not cut by the bending blade itself.

図7に、図5の打ち抜きポンチを用い、曲げ刃高さHpを変え、曲げ刃Aの肩部の曲率半径Rp=0mm、曲げ刃Aの縦壁部の角度θp=90度として打ち抜き、穴拡げ試験を行った結果を示す。ここで、材料は厚さ2.6mmのTS780MPa級熱延鋼板を用いている。打ち抜き条件は、ポンチ径Ap=10mm、打ち抜きクリアランス=12.5%、切刃端部Pと曲げ刃立ち上げ位置Dの距離Dp=1.0mmの条件である。また、穴拡げ値は、頂角60度の円錐ポンチを初期穴に入れて押し広げ穴端面の板厚方向に亀裂が貫通した時点でポンチを止め、その時の穴径の初期穴径(10mm)に対する増加率として求めた。打ち抜きクリアランスの定義は、12.5%とした。クリアランスは、ポンチとダイの間隔C/板厚t×100(%)である。
この場合は、曲げ刃高さHpを高くしても穴広げ値は大きくは改善しない。これは、この場合、図4のように曲げ刃自体による鋼板の切断が行われるため、本来切断される部分へ十分な曲げ応力を与えることができないためである。
In FIG. 7, the punching punch of FIG. 5 is used, the bending blade height Hp is changed, the radius of curvature Rp = 0 mm of the shoulder of the bending blade A, and the angle θp = 90 degrees of the vertical wall portion of the bending blade A are punched. The result of the expansion test is shown. Here, the material used is a TS780 MPa class hot rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 2.6 mm. The punching conditions are a punch diameter Ap = 10 mm, a punching clearance = 12.5%, and a distance Dp = 1.0 mm between the cutting edge end P and the bending blade rising position D. Also, the hole expansion value is determined by inserting a conical punch with an apex angle of 60 degrees into the initial hole, and then expanding the crack when the crack penetrates in the thickness direction of the end face of the hole. The initial hole diameter (10 mm) of the hole diameter at that time It was calculated as the rate of increase relative to The definition of the punching clearance was 12.5%. The clearance is a distance between the punch and the die C / plate thickness t × 100 (%).
In this case, even if the bending blade height Hp is increased, the hole expansion value is not greatly improved. This is because in this case, since the steel sheet is cut by the bending blade itself as shown in FIG. 4, a sufficient bending stress cannot be applied to the originally cut portion.

この問題を解決するため、曲げ刃形状をそれ自体による材料の切断が行われないものとすることを検討した。そして、曲げ刃縦壁の角度θpを鈍角とすることにより目的が達せられることを知見した。
に曲げ刃Aの縦壁部に所定の角度θpを付けた場合の角度θpと穴広げ率の関係を示すが、これより、曲げ刃縦壁部角度θpを100度以上170度以下とすることにより著しく穴広げ率が改善することが分かる。
In order to solve this problem, it was examined that the bending blade shape does not cut the material by itself. And it discovered that the objective could be achieved by making the angle θp of the bending blade vertical wall an obtuse angle.
FIG. 8 shows the relationship between the angle θp and the hole expansion rate when the predetermined angle θp is attached to the vertical wall portion of the bending blade A. From this, the bending blade vertical wall angle θp is set to 100 degrees or more and 170 degrees or less. It can be seen that the hole expansion rate is remarkably improved.

本発明は以上の検討を元に為されたものであり、以下をその要件とする。
本発明に用いる打ち抜きポンチまたはダイは、曲げ刃部Aおよび切刃部Bの二段構造とする必要がある。これは、切刃Bにて被加工材を剪断する前に曲げ刃Aにて被加工材の切断部Mに引張応力を与え、切断後の被加工材の切断端面の歪を低減するためである
曲げ刃肩角度θpを100度以上、170度以下とする必要がある。これは、曲げ刃肩角度θpが100度以下であると、曲げ刃Aにより材料が剪断されるため切刃Bにより剪断される部分Mに十分な引張応力を与えることができず、また、曲げ刃肩角度θpが170度以上であると、切刃Bにより剪断される部分に十分な引張応力を与えることができないためである。
The present invention has been made on the basis of the above examination, and the following is a requirement thereof.
The punching punch or die used in the present invention needs to have a two-stage structure of a bending blade portion A and a cutting blade portion B. This is because the bending edge A gives a tensile stress to the cut portion M of the workpiece before shearing the workpiece with the cutting edge B, and reduces the distortion of the cut end face of the workpiece after cutting. There is .
The bending blade shoulder angle θp needs to be 100 degrees or more and 170 degrees or less. This is because when the bending blade shoulder angle θp is 100 degrees or less, the material is sheared by the bending blade A, so that sufficient tensile stress cannot be applied to the portion M sheared by the cutting blade B, and the bending is performed. This is because if the blade shoulder angle θp is 170 degrees or more, sufficient tensile stress cannot be applied to the portion sheared by the cutting blade B.

以上の曲げ刃肩角度θpに関する条件が満たされることにより大きな効果が得られるが、曲げ刃肩角度θpと共に曲げ刃肩曲率半径Rpの両者が満たされた場合金型に接触する材料の接触面圧が軽減されるため金型磨耗が抑えられる。従って、メンテナンス上は両条件が満たされることが好ましい。
本技術による打ち抜きでは端面延性に対する打ち抜きクリアランス(図5中の間隔C/板厚t×100( % ))の影響は従来技術と比べて同じであり、従来の打ち抜き方法と比べて特段の注意を払う必要はない。
A great effect can be obtained by satisfying the above-mentioned conditions regarding the bending blade shoulder angle θp. However, when both the bending blade shoulder angle θp and the bending blade shoulder radius of curvature Rp are satisfied, the contact surface pressure of the material that contacts the mold This reduces the mold wear. Therefore, it is preferable that both conditions are satisfied in terms of maintenance.
In the punching with this technique, the influence of the punching clearance (interval C in FIG. 5 / thickness t × 100 (%)) on the end face ductility is the same as that in the conventional technique, and special attention is required in comparison with the conventional punching method. There is no need to pay.

通常の打ち抜きでは、通常適宜ダイに材料を固定するために板押さえを用いるが、本発明の打ち抜き方法においても、板押さえは適宜用いてもよい。しわ押さえ荷重(板押さえから材料に掛かる荷重)は、特に打ち抜き穴拡げ性には影響しないのでいくらでもよい。
ポンチ速度も打ち抜き穴拡げ性には大きな影響は与えないのでいかなる値でも良い。
多くの場合、打ち抜き工程では金型の磨耗を抑制するため、金型または材料に潤滑油が塗布されるが、本発明においても、そのために適宜潤滑油を用いてもよい。
また、曲げ刃Aにより十分な引張応力を与えるためには、曲げ刃高さHpは、被加工材の板厚の10%以上とすることが好ましい。
また、切刃端部Pと曲げ刃の立ち上がり位置Qの間隔Dpは0.1mm以上とすることが好ましい。これは、この間隔がこれ以下の場合、切刃Bによる被加工材の剪断の際、通常切刃肩部近傍より発生する亀裂が発生しにくくなり切刃による切断位置に歪が加わるためである。
また、本発明のポンチにおいて、切刃端部Pと曲げ刃の立ち上がり位置Qの間の部分や曲げ刃Aの底面部分や曲げ刃Aの縦壁部分は、ポンチの製作上平坦形状が好ましいが、若干の凹凸があっても上述の要件を満たしていれば効果は同じである。
In normal punching, a plate press is usually used to fix the material to the die appropriately. However, the plate press may be used as appropriate in the punching method of the present invention. The wrinkle pressing load (the load applied to the material from the plate pressing) does not particularly affect the punching hole expandability, and any amount may be used.
The punch speed does not have a great influence on the punching hole expandability, so any value can be used.
In many cases, in the punching process, lubricating oil is applied to the mold or the material in order to suppress wear of the mold, but in the present invention, lubricating oil may be used as appropriate for this purpose.
In order to give sufficient bending stress to the bending blade A, the bending blade height Hp is preferably set to 10% or more of the plate thickness of the workpiece.
The distance Dp between the cutting edge end P and the rising position Q of the bending blade is preferably 0.1 mm or more. This is because when this interval is less than this, when the workpiece is sheared by the cutting edge B, cracks that normally occur from the vicinity of the shoulder of the cutting edge are less likely to occur, and distortion is applied to the cutting position by the cutting edge. .
In the punch of the present invention, the portion between the cutting edge end P and the rising edge Q of the bending blade, the bottom surface portion of the bending blade A, and the vertical wall portion of the bending blade A preferably have a flat shape for manufacturing the punch. Even if there are slight irregularities, the effect is the same as long as the above requirements are satisfied.

本発明は、従来の切り刃Bのみのポンチに更に曲げ刃Aを付けることにより打ち抜き穴拡げ性を良好とするものであるが、曲げ刃Aを付け、更により曲げ刃高さHpを高くすることにより、切り刃Bと被加工材が接触する面圧が下がるため、切り刃端部Pの磨耗量も低減される。この観点から、曲げ刃高さHpは高いほど好ましい。しかし、高すぎる場合、対象の材料によっては、切り刃Bと被加工材が接触する前に曲げ刃Aと切刃Bの間で材料が破断し、効果が得られない場合もあるため、そのような場合は曲げ刃高さHpを概ね10mm以下とすることが好ましい。
本発明において、曲げ刃肩部曲率半径Rpに特に上限はないが、ポンチのサイズによっては曲率半径Rpが大きすぎると曲げ刃高さHpを大きくすることが困難となるので、5mm以下が好ましい。
In the present invention, the punching hole expandability is improved by further attaching the bending blade A to the punch of only the conventional cutting blade B. However, the bending blade A is attached and the bending blade height Hp is further increased. As a result, the surface pressure at which the cutting blade B and the workpiece are in contact with each other is lowered, and the amount of wear of the cutting blade end portion P is also reduced. From this viewpoint, the bending blade height Hp is preferably as high as possible. However, if it is too high, depending on the target material, the material may be broken between the bending blade A and the cutting blade B before the cutting blade B and the workpiece are in contact with each other. In such a case, it is preferable that the bending blade height Hp is approximately 10 mm or less.
In the present invention, there is no particular upper limit to the bending blade shoulder radius of curvature Rp. However, depending on the punch size, if the curvature radius Rp is too large, it becomes difficult to increase the bending blade height Hp, and it is preferably 5 mm or less.

以上ではポンチのみに曲げ刃を付けた場合の効果について説明したが、ポンチおよびダイの両方に曲げ刃を付けた場合やダイのみに曲げ刃を付けた場合も、以上で説明したポンチのみに曲げ刃を付けた場合と同じ材料に引張応力を与える効果を有するため、同じ穴拡げ性改善の効果が得られる。それらの場合の曲げ刃の寸法に関する制約は、以上で説明したポンチのみに曲げ刃を付けた場合の制約と同じである。   In the above, the effect when the bending blade is attached only to the punch has been described. However, even when the bending blade is attached to both the punch and the die, or when only the die is attached to the bending, only the punch described above is bent. Since it has the effect of giving a tensile stress to the same material as when the blade is attached, the same effect of improving the hole expandability can be obtained. The restrictions on the dimensions of the bending blade in those cases are the same as the restrictions when the bending blade is attached only to the punch described above.

に示す、タイプX 、Y の打ち抜きポンチを用い、打ち抜きを行った後、穴拡げ試験を行った。供試鋼として、A 、B と称する2 種類の高強度熱延鋼板を用いた。板厚は1.2〜5.0mmである。鋼AはTS=820MPa、YP=591MPa、T.El=32%、鋼BはTS=740MPa、YP=620MPa、T.El=23%である。用いた試験片のサイズは、幅150mm、長さ150mmであり、表2に示す条件にて行った。打ち抜きの際には材料に潤滑油を塗布した。
穴拡げ試験は、頂角6 0 度円錐ポンチを用い、「バリ外」の条件、即ち打ち抜き時にダイに接していた鋼板の表面が穴拡げ試験時にポンチの反対側となるよう試験片をセットし、行った。ポンチを打ち抜き穴に押し込み、打ち抜き端面上に割れが貫通するまでポンチを移動し、その時点での穴径Dを測定し、下式より穴拡げ値を求めた。
穴拡げ値(%)=(D(mm)−D0(mm))/D0(mm)×100 (%)
但し、初期穴径D0=1 0〜50mm( 表2記載「ポンチ径Ap」)。
After punching using punches of type X 1 and Y 2 shown in FIG. 9 , a hole expansion test was performed. Two kinds of high-strength hot-rolled steel sheets called A and B were used as test steels. The plate thickness is 1.2 to 5.0 mm. Steel A has TS = 820 MPa, YP = 591 MPa, T.P. El = 32%, Steel B is TS = 740 MPa, YP = 620 MPa, T.P. El = 23%. The size of the test piece used was 150 mm in width and 150 mm in length, and was performed under the conditions shown in Table 2. Lubricating oil was applied to the material at the time of punching.
In the hole expansion test, a 60 ° conical punch was used, and the test piece was set so that the surface of the steel plate that was in contact with the die during punching was on the opposite side of the punch during the hole expansion test. ,went. The punch was pushed into the punched hole, the punch was moved until the crack penetrated on the punched end face, the hole diameter D at that time was measured, and the hole expansion value was obtained from the following formula.
Hole expansion value (%) = (D (mm) −D0 (mm)) / D0 (mm) × 100 (%)
However, the initial hole diameter D0 = 1 to 10 to 50 mm (Table 2 “Punch Diameter Ap”).

打ち抜きクリアランスは、5〜20%とした。クリアランスは、ポンチとダイの間隔C/板厚t×100(%)である。
水準(1)、(11)、(19)、(38)、(39)については、表2中に示される材料および条件で2000回の打ち抜きを行い、その後に、ポンチ切り刃端部、およびポンチ曲げ刃肩部の磨耗状況を調べた。磨耗状況は、図10に示すように、試験後のポンチを、ポンチの中心軸を含む断面が分かるように加工・埋め込み・研磨し、その断面の形状と磨耗前の推定の形状とを比較し、図10中に示される、ポンチ切り刃端部磨耗量F1(mm)、ポンチ曲げ刃肩部の磨耗量F2(mm)を求めた。
試験により得られた穴拡げ値を表2に示している。打ち抜き・穴拡げ試験共にn=5での試験を行った。穴拡げ値はその平均値を表している。
The punching clearance was 5 to 20%. The clearance is a distance between the punch and the die C / plate thickness t × 100 (%).
For the levels (1), (11), (19), (38), (39), punching was performed 2000 times with the materials and conditions shown in Table 2, followed by punch cutting edge portions, and The wear situation of the punch bending blade shoulder was investigated. As shown in FIG. 10 , the wear state is processed, embedded, and polished so that the cross-section including the central axis of the punch can be seen, and the cross-sectional shape is compared with the estimated shape before wear. The punch cutting blade end wear amount F1 (mm) and the punch bending blade shoulder wear amount F2 (mm) shown in FIG. 10 were obtained.
Table 2 shows the hole expansion values obtained by the test. Both punching and hole expansion tests were performed at n = 5. The hole expansion value represents the average value.

水準(1)、(2)は、従来の打ち抜きポンチを用いた試験であり、本発明による打ち抜きによる穴拡げ値の比較の基準となる水準である。鋼Aで40% 、鋼Bで50%の穴拡げ値である。
水準() 〜 (37)は本発明による打ち抜きによる試験結果であり、従来法と比べ良好な穴広げ値が得られている。
水準(3)、(4)は、曲げ刃肩部の角度θpが大きく、かつ曲げ刃肩曲率半径Rpが小さい。このため、このため、この打ち抜きにより得られる穴拡げ値は従来法と比べ改善されていない。
水準(5)、(6)は、曲げ刃肩部θpの角度が小さく、かつ曲げ刃肩曲率半径Rpが小さい。このため、この打ち抜きにより得られる穴拡げ値は従来法と比べ改善されていない。
水準(1)、(19)、(39)のポンチ切り刃端部磨耗量F1(mm)を比較した場合、曲げ刃高さが高いほど切り刃端部の磨耗量F1が小さく磨耗が抑制されていることが分かる。
Levels (1) and (2) are tests using conventional punching punches, and serve as a reference for comparison of hole expansion values by punching according to the present invention. The hole expansion value is 40% for steel A and 50% for steel B.
Levels ( 9 ) to (37) are test results by punching according to the present invention, and a good hole expansion value is obtained as compared with the conventional method.
In the levels (3) and (4), the angle θp of the bending blade shoulder is large, and the bending blade shoulder radius of curvature Rp is small. For this reason, the hole expansion value obtained by this punching is not improved as compared with the conventional method.
In levels (5) and (6), the angle of the bending blade shoulder portion θp is small, and the bending blade shoulder radius of curvature Rp is small. For this reason, the hole expansion value obtained by this punching is not improved as compared with the conventional method.
When comparing the punch cutting edge end wear amount F1 (mm) of the levels (1), (19), and (39), the higher the bending blade height, the smaller the cutting edge end wear amount F1 and the more the wear is suppressed. I understand that

また、曲げ刃高さ同じ場合( 水準(19)、(11))の曲げ刃肩の磨耗を比較すると、水準(19)は曲げ刃肩角度θpのみが所定の条件を満たしている水準であり、水準(11)は曲げ刃肩曲率半径Rpと曲げ刃肩角度θpの両方が所定の条件を満たしている水準であるが、両方が所定条件を満たしている水準(11)が最も磨耗量F2は小さい。
以上から、より高い曲げ刃を付けることにより切り刃端部磨耗が抑制され、また、曲げ刃肩の曲率半径Rpと曲げ刃肩の角度θpの両方を同時に所定条件とすることにより、曲げ刃肩部の磨耗が抑制されることが確認された。
When the bending blade height is the same (levels (19) and (11)), the level (19) is a level where only the bending blade shoulder angle θp satisfies a predetermined condition. The level (11) is a level where both the bending blade shoulder radius of curvature Rp and the bending blade shoulder angle θp satisfy the predetermined condition, but the level (11) where both satisfy the predetermined condition is the amount of wear F2. Is small.
From the above, wear of the cutting edge can be suppressed by attaching a higher bending blade, and the bending blade shoulder can be set by simultaneously setting both the curvature radius Rp of the bending blade shoulder and the angle θp of the bending blade shoulder to predetermined conditions. It was confirmed that the wear of the part was suppressed.

、図11に示す、タイプX、Z、Wの打ち抜きポンチ、ダイを用い、打ち抜きを行った後、穴拡げ試験を行った。供試鋼として、TS=820MPa、YP=590MPa、T.El=30%、板厚2.6mmの熱延鋼板(鋼C)を用いた。用いた試験片のサイズは、幅150mm、長さ150mmである。打ち抜きは図10 に示す金型および表3に示す条件にて行った。打ち抜きの際には、材料に潤滑油を塗布した。
穴拡げ試験は、頂角60度円錐ポンチを用い、「バリ外」の条件、即ち打ち抜き時にダイに接していた鋼板の表面が穴拡げ試験時にポンチの反対側となるよう試験片をセットし、行った。ポンチを打ち抜き穴に押し込み、打ち抜き端面上に割れが貫通するまでポンチを移動し、その時点での穴径D を測定し、下式より穴拡げ値を求めた。
穴拡げ値(%)=(D(mm)−D0(mm))/D0(mm)×100 (%)
但し、初期穴径D0=20mm(表3記載「ポンチ径Ap」) 。
After punching using punches and dies of types X, Z, and W shown in FIGS. 9 and 11 , a hole expansion test was performed. As test steel, TS = 820 MPa, YP = 590 MPa, T.P. A hot-rolled steel sheet (steel C) with El = 30% and a plate thickness of 2.6 mm was used. The size of the test piece used is 150 mm wide and 150 mm long. Punching was performed using the mold shown in FIG. 10 and the conditions shown in Table 3. At the time of punching, lubricating oil was applied to the material.
The hole expansion test uses a conical punch with an apex angle of 60 degrees, and sets the test piece so that the surface of the steel plate that is in contact with the die at the time of punching is the opposite side of the punch during the hole expansion test. went. The punch was pushed into the punched hole, the punch was moved until the crack penetrated on the punched end face, the hole diameter D at that time was measured, and the hole expansion value was obtained from the following formula.
Hole expansion value (%) = (D (mm) −D0 (mm)) / D0 (mm) × 100 (%)
However, initial hole diameter D0 = 20 mm (Table 3 “Punch Diameter Ap”).

打ち抜きクリアランスは、12.5%とした。クリアランスは、ポンチとダイの間隔C/板厚t×100(%)である。
試験結果を表3に示す。
水準(1)は、ポンチ・ダイ共に従来の形状の場合の供試鋼の穴拡げ値を示しているが、その場合は穴拡げ率は40%と低い値である。
水準(2)は、ポンチが通常のポンチであり、かつダイの突起の肩部角度θd、肩部曲率半径Rdが所定の条件を満たしていない。即ち、ポンチ、ダイ共に所定条件を満たしておらず、穴拡げ値は改善されていない。
水準(9)は、ポンチの突起の肩部角度θp、肩部曲率半径Rp、ダイの突起の肩部角度θd、肩部曲率半径Rdが所定の条件を満たいない。即ち、ポンチ、ダイ共に所定条件を満たしておらず、穴拡げ値は改善されていない。
水準(3)、(5)〜(8)、および(11)〜(15)は、ダイ形状が所定形状となっているか、もしくは、ポンチ形状、ダイ形状共に所定形状となっており、本発明の効果が得られ、比較例の水準(1)、(2)、(9) と比べ良好な穴拡げ値が得られている

Figure 0004705348
Figure 0004705348
The punching clearance was 12.5%. The clearance is a distance between the punch and the die C / plate thickness t × 100 (%).
The test results are shown in Table 3.
Level (1) shows the hole expansion value of the test steel when the punch and die have the conventional shape. In this case, the hole expansion rate is a low value of 40%.
In the level (2), the punch is a normal punch, and the shoulder angle θd and the shoulder curvature radius Rd of the die protrusion do not satisfy the predetermined conditions. That is, neither the punch nor the die satisfies the predetermined condition, and the hole expansion value is not improved.
In the level (9), the shoulder angle θp and shoulder curvature radius Rp of the punch protrusion and the shoulder angle θd and shoulder curvature radius Rd of the die protrusion do not satisfy predetermined conditions. That is, neither the punch nor the die satisfies the predetermined condition, and the hole expansion value is not improved.
In the levels (3) , (5) to (8), and (11) to (15), the die shape is a predetermined shape, or both the punch shape and the die shape are predetermined shapes. As a result, an excellent hole expansion value is obtained as compared with the levels (1), (2), and (9) of the comparative example .
Figure 0004705348
Figure 0004705348

[図1]従来の打ち抜きに用いられる金型、および、打ち抜き時の材料の変
形の状態を示す模式図である。
[図2]削り抜き法に用いられる打ち抜きポンチの模式図である。
[図3]従来の打ち抜きに用いられる工具形状例である。
[図4]従来の打ち抜き時の材料変形挙動を示す模式図である。
[図5]本発明の打ち抜きに用いる金型の模式図である。
[図6]本発明の金型により打ち抜きを行った場合の材料変形挙動を示す模
式図である。
[図7]曲げ刃高さと穴広げ値の関係である。
[図]曲げ刃縦壁角度θpと穴拡げ値の関係である。
[図]従来および本発明の打ち抜きに用いる金型の模式図である。
[図10]金型の摩耗量の測定位置を示した図である。
[図11]従来および本発明の打ち抜きに用いる金型の模式図である。
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a mold used for conventional punching and a state of deformation of a material at the time of punching.
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a punching punch used for a cutting method.
FIG. 3 is an example of a tool shape used for conventional punching.
FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing a material deformation behavior at the time of conventional punching.
FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a mold used for punching according to the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing a material deformation behavior when punching is performed with the mold of the present invention.
FIG. 7 shows the relationship between the bending blade height and the hole expansion value.
FIG. 8 shows the relationship between the bending blade vertical wall angle θp and the hole expansion value.
FIG. 9 is a schematic view of a mold used for punching in the prior art and the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a view showing a measurement position of the wear amount of the mold.
FIG. 11 is a schematic view of a mold used for punching in the prior art and the present invention.

Claims (4)

被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とするための打ち抜き用工具において、ポンチかつ/またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であり、さらに切刃端部と曲げ刃の立ち上がり位置の間隔を0.1〜1.0mmとすると共に、ポンチとダイの間隔である打ち抜きクリアランスを0.13〜0.65mmとすることを特徴とする打ち抜き用工具。   In a punching tool for making a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch, a punching tool and / or a die cutting edge portion The tip has a bending blade having a convex shape, the bending blade shoulder angle is not less than 100 degrees and not more than 170 degrees, and the interval between the cutting edge and the rising position of the bending blade is 0.1. A punching tool having a punching clearance of 0.13 to 0.65 mm as well as a punch clearance of 1.0 to 1.0 mm. 被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とするための打ち抜き用工具において、ポンチかつ/またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部の曲率半径が0.2mm以上であり、かつ曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であり、さらに切刃端部と曲げ刃の立ち上がり位置の間隔を0.1〜1.0mmとすると共に、ポンチとダイの間隔である打ち抜きクリアランスを0.13〜0.65mmとすることを特徴とする打ち抜き用工具。   In a punching tool for making a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch, a punching tool and / or a die cutting edge portion The tip has a bending blade having a convex shape, the curvature radius of the bending blade shoulder is 0.2 mm or more, and the bending blade shoulder angle is 100 degrees or more and 170 degrees or less; For punching, characterized in that the distance between the rising edge of the cutting edge and the bending blade is 0.1 to 1.0 mm, and the punching clearance that is the distance between the punch and the die is 0.13 to 0.65 mm. tool. 被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とする打ち抜き用工程において、ポンチかつ/ またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であり、さらに切刃端部と曲げ刃の立ち上がり位置の間隔を0.1〜1.0mmとすると共に、ポンチとダイの間隔である打ち抜きクリアランスを0.13〜0.65mmとする打ち抜き用工具を用いることを特徴とする鋼板打ち抜き方法。   In the punching process for forming a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch, the tip of the punch and / or die cutting edge portion The bending blade has a convex shape, the bending blade shoulder angle is not less than 100 degrees and not more than 170 degrees, and the interval between the cutting edge and the rising edge of the bending blade is 0.1 to 1. A steel plate punching method using a punching tool having a punching clearance of 0.13 to 0.65 mm and a punch clearance of 0.13 to 0.65 mm. 被加工材となる鋼板を少なくともダイおよびポンチを用いて剪断部および被剪断部に切断することにより被加工材を所定形状とする打ち抜き用工具において、ポンチかつ/ またはダイの切刃部の先端部に、凸状の形状を有する曲げ刃を有し、かつ、曲げ刃肩部の曲率半径が0.2mm以上であり、かつ曲げ刃肩部角度が100度以上170度以下であり、さらに切刃端部と曲げ刃の立ち上がり位置の間隔を0.1〜1.0mmとすると共に、ポンチとダイの間隔である打ち抜きクリアランスを0.13〜0.65mmとする打ち抜き用工具を用いることを特徴とする鋼板打ち抜き方法 In a punching tool for making a workpiece into a predetermined shape by cutting a steel plate as a workpiece into a sheared portion and a sheared portion using at least a die and a punch, the tip of the punch and / or the cutting edge of the die A bending blade having a convex shape, a radius of curvature of the bending blade shoulder is 0.2 mm or more, a bending blade shoulder angle is 100 degrees or more and 170 degrees or less, and the cutting blade It is characterized by using a punching tool in which the interval between the end portion and the rising position of the bending blade is 0.1 to 1.0 mm, and the punching clearance which is the distance between the punch and the die is 0.13 to 0.65 mm. Steel plate punching method to do .
JP2004235916A 2003-08-19 2004-08-13 Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same Active JP4705348B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004235916A JP4705348B2 (en) 2003-08-19 2004-08-13 Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003207806 2003-08-19
JP2003207806 2003-08-19
JP2004235916A JP4705348B2 (en) 2003-08-19 2004-08-13 Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005095980A JP2005095980A (en) 2005-04-14
JP4705348B2 true JP4705348B2 (en) 2011-06-22

Family

ID=34466665

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004235916A Active JP4705348B2 (en) 2003-08-19 2004-08-13 Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4705348B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007307616A (en) * 2006-04-20 2007-11-29 Nippon Steel Corp Method and tool for shearing metal sheet, and metal sheet product obtained by shearing
JP5643615B2 (en) * 2010-11-11 2014-12-17 日新製鋼株式会社 Method of shearing painted steel sheet
JP5719149B2 (en) * 2010-11-11 2015-05-13 日新製鋼株式会社 Painted steel plate shearing punch and coated steel plate shearing method
JP2013169595A (en) * 2012-02-23 2013-09-02 Toyota Motor East Japan Inc Shearing press die
US10384256B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2019-08-20 Nippon Steel Corporation Tooling for punching steel sheet and punching method
EP3231527B1 (en) * 2014-12-10 2021-03-24 Nippon Steel Corporation Blank, die assembly and method for producing a blank
JP7335481B2 (en) * 2018-07-30 2023-08-30 日本製鉄株式会社 Shearing method and shearing device

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05138260A (en) * 1991-11-26 1993-06-01 Amada Co Ltd Low noise piercing method of press and device therefor
JPH06122028A (en) * 1992-10-13 1994-05-06 Toyota Motor Corp Method and device for punching special shape

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5985622U (en) * 1982-11-30 1984-06-09 富士通機電株式会社 sheet metal punching equipment
JPS61152342U (en) * 1985-03-14 1986-09-20
JPH09164431A (en) * 1995-12-14 1997-06-24 Hitachi Ltd Burring method

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05138260A (en) * 1991-11-26 1993-06-01 Amada Co Ltd Low noise piercing method of press and device therefor
JPH06122028A (en) * 1992-10-13 1994-05-06 Toyota Motor Corp Method and device for punching special shape

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005095980A (en) 2005-04-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6142927B2 (en) Steel sheet punching tool and punching method
JP4711396B2 (en) Punching method for high strength steel sheet
EP3231527A1 (en) Blank, molded article, mold and method for producing blank
JP2006224121A (en) Steel sheet punching tool, and punching method using the same
JP4705348B2 (en) Steel sheet punching tool and punching method using the same
CN113365752B (en) Method for manufacturing stamped member and method for manufacturing blank
JP2006289491A (en) Method for working high strength steel thin sheet having excellent crack resistance, and cutting blade for cutting
JP4937959B2 (en) Punching method and apparatus
JPWO2020145063A1 (en) Shearing method of metal plate and manufacturing method of pressed parts
JP4510572B2 (en) Manufacturing method for automotive parts having punched end faces with excellent fatigue characteristics
JP6977913B1 (en) Manufacturing method of pressed parts and manufacturing method of blank material
JP2007307616A (en) Method and tool for shearing metal sheet, and metal sheet product obtained by shearing
JP4943393B2 (en) Coining method after punching and coining punch
JP4638746B2 (en) Shear shear blade, shearing method, and shearing device for reducing cracks on cut surface
JP6888472B2 (en) Shearing method
JP7338573B2 (en) Shearing blade, shearing mold, shearing method for metal plate, and method for manufacturing pressed parts
JP2006224123A (en) Steel plate punching method
WO2023037961A1 (en) Method for improving delayed fracture characteristics of steel sheet, method for producing blank, method for producing press-formed article, and press-formed article
JP4436216B2 (en) Metal sheet press forming method
JP4436176B2 (en) Press mold having excellent shape freezing property and press molding method
JPH11319981A (en) Punching method of high silicon steel plate
JP2006224122A (en) Blank of thin steel plate having excellent formability and fatigue characteristic of punched end face
JPH10118725A (en) Method for punching out thick steel plate excellent in fatigue characteristic
JP2004358514A (en) Method for improving fatigue strength of punching surface
JPH07275938A (en) Clad high strength steel sheet superior in shape freezing characteristic

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20060213

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20081114

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20081125

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090126

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090908

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20091109

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20091221

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100202

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100405

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100928

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101122

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110308

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110311

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 4705348

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140318

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350