JP4435639B2 - Golf ball - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a golf ball. Specifically, the present invention relates to a multi-piece golf ball that includes a core, an intermediate layer, and a cover.

  A golfer's greatest concern with golf balls is flight performance. A golf ball with excellent flight performance contributes to the score. In particular, golf players place importance on the flight distance of shots with a driver.

  Golfers also place importance on the spin performance of golf balls. If the backspin rate is high, the run is small. For golfers, a golf ball that is subject to backspin is likely to be stationary at a target point. When the side spin rate is high, the golf ball tends to bend. For golfers, golf balls that are susceptible to side spin tend to bend intentionally. A golf ball excellent in spin performance is excellent in control performance. Advanced golfers place particular importance on control performance in shots with short irons.

From the viewpoint of improving flight performance and control performance, golf balls having various structures have been proposed. For example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-179795 discloses a golf ball including a core, an intermediate layer made of ionomer resin, and a cover made of polyurethane.
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 10-179795

  In terms of flight performance, a highly elastic cover is advantageous. However, a highly elastic cover tends to hinder control performance. In terms of control performance, a soft cover is advantageous. However, a soft cover is disadvantageous in terms of flight performance. Golfers' demand for golf balls has been escalating in recent years. A high level balance between flight performance and control performance is eagerly desired. An object of the present invention is to provide a golf ball having excellent flight performance and control performance.

  The golf ball according to the present invention includes a spherical core, an intermediate layer located outside the core, and a cover located outside the intermediate layer. The main component of the intermediate layer base polymer is an ionomer resin. The intermediate layer has a hardness Hm measured by a Shore D hardness tester of 62 or more. The hardness Hc of this cover measured with a Shore D type hardness tester is 55 or less. The mass Wc of this cover is 3.2 g or less. The ratio (Hc / Wc) of the hardness Hc of the cover to the mass Wc (g) is 10.0 or more.

  Preferably, the main component of the base polymer of the cover is a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer. Preferably, the thickness Tc of the cover is 0.6 mm or less.

Preferably, the golf ball includes a reinforcing layer having a thermosetting resin as a base polymer between the intermediate layer and the cover. Preferably, the thickness of this reinforcing layer is 3 μm or more and 50 μm or less. Preferably, the tensile strength of the reinforcing layer is 150 kgf / cm ² or more and 500 kgf / cm ² or less.

  When shot with a short iron, the head speed is low, so the amount of deformation of the golf ball is small. In a shot with a short iron, the spin speed mainly depends on the material of the cover surface. Since the golf ball according to the present invention includes a cover having a hardness Hc of 55 or less, slip between the golf ball and the club face in impact is suppressed. This golf ball has a high spin speed when shot with a short iron. This golf ball is excellent in control performance in a shot with a short iron.

  In the shot with the driver, the intermediate layer and the core are greatly deformed together with the cover. A cover having a low hardness Hc is disadvantageous in terms of resilience performance. In this golf ball, since the cover mass Wc is 3.2 g or less and the ratio (Hc / Wc) is 10.0 or more, the adverse effect of the cover on the resilience performance is small. A large resilience performance can be obtained by using an ionomer resin and providing an intermediate layer having a hardness Hm of 62 or more. This golf ball has excellent flight performance when shot with a driver.

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail based on preferred embodiments with appropriate reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a partially cutaway sectional view showing a golf ball 2 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The golf ball 2 includes a spherical core 4, an intermediate layer 6 that covers the core 4, a reinforcing layer 8 that covers the intermediate layer 6, and a cover 10 that covers the reinforcing layer 8. A large number of dimples 12 are formed on the surface of the cover 10. A portion of the surface of the cover 10 other than the dimples 12 is a land 14. The golf ball 2 includes a paint layer and a mark layer outside the cover 10, but these layers are not shown.

  The golf ball 2 has a diameter of 40 mm to 45 mm. The diameter is preferably 42.67 mm or more from the viewpoint that the American Golf Association (USGA) standard is satisfied. In light of air resistance suppression, the diameter is preferably equal to or less than 44 mm, and more preferably equal to or less than 42.80 mm. The golf ball 2 has a mass of 40 g or more and 50 g or less. From the viewpoint of obtaining a large inertia, the mass is preferably 44 g or more, and more preferably 45.00 g or more. From the viewpoint that the USGA standard is satisfied, the mass is preferably equal to or less than 45.93 g.

  The core 4 is usually obtained by crosslinking a rubber composition. Preferred base rubbers include polybutadiene, polyisoprene, styrene-butadiene copolymer, ethylene-propylene-diene copolymer, and natural rubber. From the viewpoint of resilience performance, polybutadiene is preferred. When polybutadiene and other rubber are used in combination, it is preferable that polybutadiene is a main component. Specifically, the proportion of polybutadiene in the total base rubber is preferably 50% by mass or more, particularly 80% by mass or more. Polybutadiene having a cis-1,4 bond ratio of 40% or more, particularly 80% or more is particularly preferred.

  For crosslinking of the core 4, a co-crosslinking agent is usually used. A preferred co-crosslinking agent from the viewpoint of resilience performance is a monovalent or divalent metal salt of an α, β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 2 to 8 carbon atoms. Specific examples of preferred co-crosslinking agents include zinc acrylate, magnesium acrylate, zinc methacrylate and magnesium methacrylate. Zinc acrylate and zinc methacrylate are particularly preferable because of high resilience performance.

  As a co-crosslinking agent, an α, β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 2 to 8 carbon atoms and a metal oxide may be blended. Both react in the rubber composition to obtain a salt. This salt contributes to the crosslinking reaction. Preferred α, β-unsaturated carboxylic acids include acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Preferred metal oxides include zinc oxide and magnesium oxide.

  The compounding amount of the co-crosslinking agent is preferably 10 parts by mass or more and 50 parts by mass or less with respect to 100 parts by mass of the base rubber. When the blending amount is less than the above range, the resilience performance of the golf ball 2 may be insufficient. In this respect, the amount to be blended is more preferably equal to or greater than 15 parts by weight. When the amount exceeds the above range, the feel at impact of the golf ball 2 may become hard. In this respect, the amount to be blended is more preferably equal to or less than 45 parts by weight.

  The rubber composition used for the core 4 is preferably blended with an organic peroxide together with a co-crosslinking agent. The organic peroxide functions as a crosslinking initiator. By blending the organic peroxide, the resilience performance of the golf ball 2 is enhanced. Suitable organic peroxides include dicumyl peroxide, 1,1-bis (t-butylperoxy) -3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di (t- Butyl peroxy) hexane and di-t-butyl peroxide. A particularly versatile organic peroxide is dicumyl peroxide.

  The compounding amount of the organic peroxide is preferably 0.1 parts by mass or more and 3.0 parts by mass or less with respect to 100 parts by mass of the base rubber. When the blending amount is less than the above range, the resilience performance of the golf ball 2 may be insufficient. In this respect, the amount is more preferably equal to or greater than 0.3 parts by weight, and particularly preferably equal to or greater than 0.5 parts by weight. When the amount exceeds the above range, the feel at impact of the golf ball 2 may become hard. In this respect, the amount to be blended is more preferably equal to or less than 2.5 parts by mass.

  A filler may be blended in the core 4 for the purpose of adjusting specific gravity and the like. Suitable fillers include zinc oxide, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate. As a filler, a powder made of a high specific gravity metal may be blended. Specific examples of the high specific gravity metal include tungsten and molybdenum. The blending amount of the filler is appropriately determined so that the intended specific gravity of the core 4 is achieved. A particularly preferred filler is zinc oxide. Zinc oxide functions not only as a specific gravity adjuster but also as a crosslinking aid. In the core 4, various additives such as sulfur, a sulfur compound, an anti-aging agent, a colorant, a plasticizer, and a dispersant are blended in appropriate amounts as necessary. The core 4 may be blended with a crosslinked rubber powder or a synthetic resin powder.

  The amount of compressive deformation of the core 4 is preferably 5.0 mm or less, more preferably 4.5 mm or less, and particularly preferably 4.0 mm or less. When the golf ball 2 is hit with a driver, the core 4 is greatly deformed together with the cover 10 and the mid layer 6. The core 4 having a small amount of compressive deformation contributes to the flight performance in a shot with a driver. If the amount of compressive deformation is too small, the feel at impact is impaired. In light of feel at impact, the amount of compressive deformation is preferably equal to or greater than 1.5 mm, and particularly preferably equal to or greater than 2.0 mm.

  In measuring the amount of compressive deformation, the core 4 is first placed on a metal rigid plate. Next, the metal cylinder gradually descends toward the core 4. The core 4 sandwiched between the bottom surface of the cylinder and the rigid plate is deformed. The moving distance of the cylinder from the state where the initial load of 98 N is applied to the core 4 to the state where the final load of 1274 N is applied is the amount of compressive deformation.

  The diameter of the core 4 is preferably 25 mm or greater and 41.5 mm or less. The mass of the core 4 is preferably 25 g or more and 42 g or less. The crosslinking temperature of the core 4 is usually 140 ° C. or higher and 180 ° C. or lower. The crosslinking time of the core 4 is usually 10 minutes or longer and 60 minutes or shorter. The core 4 may be formed from two or more layers.

  For the mid layer 6, a thermoplastic resin composition is suitably used. Examples of the base polymer of the resin composition include ionomer resins, thermoplastic polyester elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers, thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers, and thermoplastic polystyrene elastomers. In particular, an ionomer resin is preferable. The ionomer resin is highly elastic. Ionomer resin contributes to flight performance on shots with drivers.

  An ionomer resin and another resin may be used in combination. When used in combination, the ionomer resin is the main component of the base polymer from the viewpoint of flight performance. The proportion of the ionomer resin in the total base polymer is preferably 50% by mass or more, more preferably 70% by mass or more, and particularly preferably 85% or more.

  Preferably, an ionomer resin in which a part of a carboxylic acid in a copolymer of an α-olefin and an α, β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8 carbon atoms is neutralized with a metal ion is used. Preferred α-olefins are ethylene and propylene. Preferred α, β-unsaturated carboxylic acids are acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Examples of the metal ions for neutralization include sodium ions, potassium ions, lithium ions, zinc ions, calcium ions, magnesium ions, aluminum ions, and neodymium ions. Neutralization may be performed with two or more metal ions. Particularly suitable metal ions from the viewpoint of resilience performance and durability of the golf ball 2 are sodium ion, zinc ion, lithium ion and magnesium ion.

  Specific examples of the ionomer resin include Mitsui Dupont Polychemical's trade names “High Milan 1555”, “High Milan 1557”, “High Milan 1605”, “High Milan 1706”, “High Milan 1707”, “High Milan 1855”, “High Milan 1856”. "High Milan AM7311", "High Milan AM7315", "High Milan AM7317", "High Milan AM7318" and "High Milan MK7320"; DuPont's trade names "Surlin 7930", "Surlin 7940", "Surlin 8140", "Surlin 8940" "Surlin 8945", "Surlin 9120", "Surlin 9910" and "Surlin 9945"; and Exxon's trade names "IOTEK7010", "IOTEK7030", "IOTEK8000 And "IOTEK8030" and the like.

  A filler may be blended in the resin composition of the mid layer 6 for the purpose of adjusting specific gravity and the like. Suitable fillers include zinc oxide, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate. As a filler, a powder made of a high specific gravity metal may be blended. Specific examples of the high specific gravity metal include tungsten and molybdenum. The blending amount of the filler is appropriately determined so that the intended specific gravity of the mid layer 6 is achieved. The intermediate layer 6 may be blended with a colorant, a crosslinked rubber powder, or a synthetic resin powder.

  The mid layer 6 has a hardness Hm of 62 or more. This mid layer 6 contributes to the flight performance in a shot with a driver. From the viewpoint of flight performance, the hardness Hm of the mid layer 6 is preferably 63 or more. When the hardness Hm is extremely large, it is difficult to obtain a good feeling when the golf ball 2 is hit. In this respect, the hardness Hm is preferably 72 or less, more preferably 70 or less, and particularly preferably 68 or less.

  In the present invention, the hardness Hm of the mid layer 6 and the hardness Hc of the cover 10 are measured in accordance with the provisions of “ASTM-D 2240-68”. For the measurement, an automatic rubber hardness meter (trade name “LA1”, available from Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd.) to which a spring type hardness meter Shore D type is attached is used. For the measurement, a sheet made of the same material as that of the intermediate layer 6 (or the cover 10) and having a thickness of about 2 mm is used. Prior to measurement, the sheet is stored at a temperature of 23 ° C. for 2 weeks. At the time of measurement, three sheets are overlaid.

  The thickness Tm of the mid layer 6 is preferably 0.3 mm or greater and 2.5 mm or less. If the thickness Tm is less than the above range, the flight performance in a shot with a driver may be insufficient. From this viewpoint, the thickness Tm is preferably 0.5 mm or more, more preferably 0.7 mm or more, and further preferably 1.0 mm or more. When the thickness Tm exceeds the above range, it is difficult to obtain a good feeling when the golf ball 2 is hit. In this respect, the thickness Tm is more preferably equal to or less than 2.3 mm.

  From the viewpoint of adhesion between the intermediate layer 6 and the reinforcing layer 8 or the cover 10, it is preferable that the surface of the intermediate layer 6 is treated to increase its roughness. Specific examples of the treatment include brushing and polishing.

  For the reinforcing layer 8, a two-component curable thermosetting resin is suitably used as the base polymer. Specific examples of the two-component curable thermosetting resin include an epoxy resin, a urethane resin, an acrylic resin, a polyester resin, and a cellulose resin. From the viewpoint of mechanical properties (for example, breaking strength) and durability of the reinforcing layer 8, a two-component curable epoxy resin and a two-component curable urethane resin are preferable.

  The two-component curable epoxy resin is obtained by curing the epoxy resin with a polyamide curing agent. Examples of the epoxy resin used in the two-component curable epoxy resin include bisphenol A type epoxy resin, bisphenol F type epoxy resin, and bisphenol AD type epoxy resin. The bisphenol A type epoxy resin is obtained by a reaction between bisphenol A and an epoxy group-containing compound such as epichlorohydrin. The bisphenol F type epoxy resin is obtained by a reaction between bisphenol F and an epoxy group-containing compound. The bisphenol AD type epoxy resin is obtained by a reaction between bisphenol AD and an epoxy group-containing compound. From the viewpoint of the balance of flexibility, chemical resistance, heat resistance and toughness, bisphenol A type epoxy resin is preferable.

  The polyamide-based curing agent has a plurality of amino groups and one or more amide groups. This amino group can react with an epoxy group. Specific examples of the polyamide curing agent include a polyamide amine curing agent and a modified product thereof. The polyamidoamine curing agent is obtained by a condensation reaction between a polymerized fatty acid and a polyamine. Typical polymerized fatty acids can be obtained by synthesizing natural fatty acids containing a large amount of unsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic acid and linolenic acid by heating in the presence of a catalyst. Specific examples of unsaturated fatty acids include tall oil, soybean oil, linseed oil and fish oil. A polymerized fatty acid having a dimer content of 90% by mass or more, a trimer content of 10% by mass or less, and hydrogenated is preferable. Preferred polyamines include polyethylene diamine, polyoxyalkylene diamine and derivatives thereof.

  In the mixing of the epoxy resin and the polyamide curing agent, the ratio of the epoxy equivalent of the epoxy resin and the amine active hydrogen equivalent of the polyamide curing agent is 1.0 / 1.4 or more and 1.0 / 1.0 or less. Is preferred.

  The two-component curable urethane resin is obtained by a reaction between the main agent and the curing agent. A two-component curable urethane resin obtained by a reaction between a main component containing a polyol component and a curing agent containing a polyisocyanate or a derivative thereof, a main component containing an isocyanate group-terminated urethane prepolymer, and a curing agent having active hydrogen. A two-component curable urethane resin obtained by reaction may be used. In particular, a two-component curable urethane resin obtained by a reaction between a main component containing a polyol component and a curing agent containing polyisocyanate or a derivative thereof is preferable.

  It is preferable that urethane polyol is used as the polyol component of the main agent. The urethane polyol has a urethane bond and at least two or more hydroxyl groups. Preferably, the urethane polyol has a hydroxyl group at its terminal. The urethane polyol can be obtained by reacting the polyol and the polyisocyanate at a ratio such that the hydroxyl group of the polyol component is excessive in molar ratio with respect to the isocyanate group of the polyisocyanate.

  The polyol used for the production of the urethane polyol has a plurality of hydroxyl groups. A polyol having a weight average molecular weight of 50 to 2,000, particularly 100 to 1,000 is preferred. Examples of the low molecular weight polyol include diol and triol. Specific examples of the diol include ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,4-butanediol, neopentyl glycol and 1,6-hexanediol. Specific examples of the triol include trimethylolpropane and hexanetriol. High molecular weight polyols include polyether polyols such as polyoxyethylene glycol (PEG), polyoxypropylene glycol (PPG) and polyoxytetramethylene glycol (PTMG); polyethylene adipate (PEA), polybutylene adipate (PBA) ) And polyhexamethylene adipate (PHMA); lactone polyester polyols such as poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL); polycarbonate polyols such as polyhexamethylene carbonate; and acrylic polyols. Two or more polyols may be used in combination.

  The polyisocyanate used for the production of the urethane polyol has a plurality of isocyanate groups. Specific examples of the polyisocyanate include 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, a mixture of 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (TDI), and 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). ), 1,5-naphthylene diisocyanate (NDI), 3,3′-vitrylene-4,4′-diisocyanate (TODI), xylylene diisocyanate (XDI), tetramethylxylylene diisocyanate (TMXDI) and paraphenylene diisocyanate ( Aromatic polyisocyanates such as PPDI); 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12MDI), hydrogenated xylylene diisocyanate (H6XDI), hexamethylene diisocyanate (H Alicyclic polyisocyanates such as I) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI); and aliphatic polyisocyanates. Two or more polyisocyanates may be used in combination. From the viewpoint of weather resistance, TMXDI, XDI, HDI, H6XDI, IPDI and H12MDI are preferred.

  A known catalyst can be used in the reaction of the polyol and the polyisocyanate for producing the urethane polyol. A typical catalyst is dibutyltin dilaurate.

  From the viewpoint of the strength of the reinforcing layer 8, the ratio of the urethane bond contained in the urethane polyol is preferably 0.1 mmol / g or more. From the viewpoint of followability of the reinforcing layer 8 to the cover, the ratio of the urethane bond contained in the urethane polyol is preferably 5 mmol / g or less. The ratio of the urethane bond can be adjusted by adjusting the molecular weight of the polyol as a raw material and adjusting the blending ratio of the polyol and the polyisocyanate.

  From the viewpoint that the time required for the reaction between the main agent and the curing agent is short, the weight average molecular weight of the urethane polyol is preferably 4000 or more, and more preferably 4500 or more. From the viewpoint of adhesion of the reinforcing layer 8, the weight average molecular weight of the urethane polyol is preferably 10,000 or less, and more preferably 9000 or less.

  From the viewpoint of adhesion of the reinforcing layer 8, the hydroxyl value (mgKOH / g) of the urethane polyol is preferably 15 or more, and more preferably 73 or more. From the viewpoint that the time required for the reaction between the main agent and the curing agent is short, the hydroxyl value of the urethane polyol is preferably 130 or less, more preferably 120 or less.

  The main agent may contain a polyol having no urethane bond together with the urethane polyol. The aforementioned polyol, which is a raw material for urethane polyol, can be used as the main agent. Polyols that are compatible with urethane polyols are preferred. From the viewpoint that the time required for the reaction between the main agent and the curing agent is short, the ratio of the urethane polyol in the main agent is preferably 50% by mass or more and more preferably 80% by mass or more in terms of solid content. Ideally this ratio is 100% by weight.

  The curing agent contains polyisocyanate or a derivative thereof. The aforementioned polyisocyanate, which is a raw material of urethane polyol, can be used as a curing agent.

  The reinforcing layer 8 may contain additives such as a colorant (typically titanium dioxide), a phosphoric acid stabilizer, an antioxidant, a light stabilizer, a fluorescent brightener, an ultraviolet absorber, and an antiblocking agent. . The additive may be added to the main component of the two-component curable thermosetting resin, or may be added to the curing agent.

  The reinforcing layer 8 is obtained by applying a liquid in which the main agent and the curing agent are dissolved or dispersed in a solvent to the surface of the intermediate layer 6. From the viewpoint of workability, application with a spray gun is preferred. After application, the solvent volatilizes and the main agent and the curing agent react to form the reinforcing layer 8. Preferred solvents include toluene, isopropyl alcohol, xylene, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethylene glycol monomethyl ether, ethylbenzene, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, isobutyl alcohol and ethyl acetate.

  The reinforcing layer 8 is interposed between the intermediate layer 6 and the cover 10 to enhance the adhesion between them. As will be described later, the cover 10 of the golf ball 2 is extremely thin. If the thin cover 10 is hit by the edge of the club face, wrinkles are likely to occur. The reinforcing layer 8 suppresses wrinkles.

  The club face has a loft. At the time of impact with the club face, a twisting force is applied to the golf ball. This force deforms the cover 10 in the circumferential direction. This deformation is suppressed by the presence of the reinforcing layer 8. The reinforcing layer 8 achieves a low spin speed and a large launch angle, and a large flight distance in a shot with a driver can be obtained. Due to the synergistic effect of the intermediate layer 6 having a hardness Hm of 62 or more, the cover 10 having a ratio (Hc / Wc) of 10.0 or more, and the reinforcing layer 8, extremely excellent flight performance in a shot with a driver can be obtained. The reinforcing layer 8 also suppresses a decrease in resilience performance due to repeated impacts.

In light of the flight performance and wrinkle suppression in shots with a driver, the tensile strength of the reinforcing layer 8 is preferably 150 kgf / cm ² above, 200 kgf / cm ² more is more preferable. The tensile strength usually obtained is 500 kgf / cm ² or less. The tensile strength is measured in accordance with the provisions of “JIS K5400”. A sample to be measured is obtained by applying the coating composition to a test plate with a spray gun. The coating composition is kept in an atmosphere at 40 ° C. for 24 hours. The tensile speed at the time of measurement is 50 mm / min.

  From the viewpoint of flight performance in a shot with a driver and suppression of wrinkles, the pencil hardness of the reinforcing layer 8 is preferably 4B or more, more preferably 3B or more, and particularly preferably B or more. From the viewpoint of following the cover 10 when the golf ball 2 is hit, the pencil hardness of the reinforcing layer 8 is preferably 4H or less, more preferably 3H or less, and particularly preferably 2H or less. The pencil hardness is measured in accordance with the provisions of “JIS K5400”.

  From the viewpoint of suppressing wrinkles, the thickness of the reinforcing layer 8 is preferably 3 μm or more, and more preferably 5 μm or more. From the viewpoint that the reinforcing layer 8 is easily formed, the thickness is preferably 300 μm or less, more preferably 100 μm or less, further 50 μm or less, and further preferably 20 μm or less. The thickness is measured by observing a cross section of the golf ball 2 with a microscope. When the surface of the intermediate layer 6 is provided with irregularities by the roughening treatment, the thickness is measured immediately above the convex portions.

  In the case where the intermediate layer 6 and the cover 10 are sufficiently in close contact with each other and wrinkles are unlikely to occur, the reinforcing layer 8 may not be provided.

  For the cover 10, a thermoplastic resin composition is suitably used. Examples of the base polymer of the resin composition include thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers, thermoplastic polyester elastomers, thermoplastic polyamide elastomers, thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers, thermoplastic polystyrene elastomers, and ionomer resins. In particular, a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer is preferable. The thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer is soft. When the golf ball 2 having the cover 10 made of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer is hit with a short iron, the spin rate is high. The cover 10 made of a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer contributes to control performance in a shot with a short iron. The thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer also contributes to the scratch resistance performance of the cover 10.

  A thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer and other resin may be used in combination. When used in combination, a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer is the main component of the base polymer from the viewpoint of control performance. The ratio of the thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer in the total base polymer is preferably 50% by mass or more, more preferably 70% by mass or more, and particularly preferably 85% by mass or more.

  The thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer includes a polyurethane component as a hard segment and a polyester component or a polyether component as a soft segment. Examples of the curing agent for the polyurethane component include alicyclic diisocyanate, aromatic diisocyanate and aliphatic diisocyanate. In particular, alicyclic diisocyanates are preferred. Since the alicyclic diisocyanate does not have a double bond in the main chain, yellowing of the cover 10 is suppressed. In addition, since the alicyclic diisocyanate is excellent in strength, damage to the cover 10 is suppressed. Two or more diisocyanates may be used in combination.

Examples of alicyclic diisocyanates include 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H ₁₂ MDI), 1,3-bis (isocyanatomethyl) cyclohexane (H ₆ XDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), and trans-1,4- Examples are cyclohexane diisocyanate (CHDI). From the viewpoint of versatility and workability, H ₁₂ MDI is preferable.

  Aromatic diisocyanates include 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI). As the aliphatic diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) is exemplified.

  Specific examples of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers include BASF Japan's trade name “Elastolan XNY90A”, trade name “Elastolan XNY97A”, trade name “Elastolan XNY585”, and trade name “Elastolan XKP016N”; The trade name “Rezamin P4585LS” and the trade name “Rezamin PS62490” of the industrial company are listed.

  If necessary, the cover 10 includes a colorant such as titanium dioxide, a filler such as barium sulfate, a dispersant, an antioxidant, an ultraviolet absorber, a light stabilizer, a fluorescent agent, a fluorescent whitening agent, and the like. Appropriate amount is blended. For the purpose of adjusting the specific gravity, the cover 10 may be mixed with a powder of a high specific gravity metal such as tungsten or molybdenum.

  The cover 10 has a hardness Hc of 55 or less. By adopting the soft cover 10, it is possible to achieve good control performance in a shot with a short iron. From the viewpoint of control performance, the hardness Hc is more preferably 50 or less, and particularly preferably 47 or less. If the hardness is too low, the flight performance on a shot with a driver will be insufficient. In this respect, the hardness is preferably 20 or greater, more preferably 28 or greater, and even more preferably 33 or greater.

  The ratio (Hc / Wc) of the hardness Hc to the mass Wc (g) of the cover 10 is 10.0 or more. The ratio (Hc / Wc) is an index representing the degree of contribution of the cover 10 to the flight performance in a shot with a driver. By setting the ratio (Hc / Wc) to 10.0 or more, a large flight distance can be obtained even though the cover 10 is soft. In light of flight performance, the ratio (Hc / Wc) is preferably equal to or greater than 15.0 and more preferably equal to or greater than 20.0. From the viewpoint of control performance in shots with a short iron, the ratio (Hc / Wc) is preferably 100 or less, and more preferably 50 or less.

  The mass Wc of the cover 10 is 3.2 g or less. As described above, the cover 10 has a low hardness. The low hardness cover 10 is disadvantageous in terms of the coefficient of restitution of the golf ball 2. In the shot with the driver, the mid layer 6 and the core 4 of the golf ball 2 are also greatly deformed. By setting the mass Wc to 3.2 g or less, even if the cover 10 has a low hardness, the cover 10 does not have a significant adverse effect on the coefficient of restitution upon a shot with a driver. The combination of the cover 10 and the high-hardness intermediate layer 6 can achieve excellent flight performance in a shot with a driver.

  In light of flight performance, the mass Wc is preferably equal to or less than 2.6 g, and more preferably equal to or less than 2.3 g. If the mass Wc is too small, it will be difficult to form the cover 10. In this respect, the mass Wc is preferably equal to or greater than 0.6 g, and more preferably equal to or greater than 1.0 g.

  From the viewpoint of flight performance in a shot with a driver, the thickness Tc of the cover 10 is preferably 0.6 mm or less, more preferably 0.5 mm or less, and particularly preferably 0.4 mm or less. In light of easy molding, the thickness Tc is preferably equal to or greater than 0.1 mm, and more preferably equal to or greater than 0.2 mm.

  Hereinafter, the effects of the present invention will be clarified by examples. However, the present invention should not be construed in a limited manner based on the description of the examples.

[Example 1]
100 parts by weight of polybutadiene (trade name “BR-730” from JSR), 35 parts by weight of zinc acrylate, an appropriate amount of zinc oxide, 0.7 parts by weight of bis (pentabromophenyl) disulfide and 0.9 parts by weight Dicumyl peroxide was kneaded to obtain a rubber composition. The rubber composition was put into a mold composed of an upper mold and a lower mold each having a hemispherical cavity, and heated at 170 ° C. for 15 minutes to obtain a core having a diameter of 38.5 mm. The mass of this core was 34.9 g.

  50 parts by mass of ionomer resin (previously Himiran 1605), 50 parts by mass of other ionomer resin (previously Surlyn 9945), 4 parts by mass of titanium dioxide and 0.1 part by mass of colorant (ultramarine blue) The resin composition was obtained by kneading with a shaft extruder. This resin composition was coated around the core by an injection molding method to obtain an intermediate layer. The intermediate layer had a hardness Hm of 63.

  A coating composition (trade name “Porin 750LE”, manufactured by Shinto Paint Co., Ltd.) using a two-pack curable epoxy resin as a base polymer was prepared. The curing agent liquid of this coating composition is composed of 40 parts by mass of modified polyamidoamine, 55 parts by mass of solvent, and 5 parts by mass of titanium oxide. The mass ratio with respect to the curing agent liquid is 1/1 This coating composition was applied to the surface of the intermediate layer with a spray gun and held at 40 ° C. for 24 hours to obtain a reinforcing layer. The thickness of was 10 μm.

  Using a twin screw extruder, a resin composition of type c shown in Table 1 below was obtained. A half shell was obtained from this resin composition by compression molding. The two half shells cover the sphere consisting of the core, intermediate layer, and reinforcing layer, and both are put into a mold consisting of an upper die and a lower die having a hemispherical cavity, and a cover is obtained by compression molding. It was. The mass of the cover was 2.6 g. A paint layer was formed around the cover to obtain a golf ball of Example 1.

[Examples 2 and 3]
Golf balls of Examples 2 and 3 were obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the thickness and type of the cover were as shown in Table 2 below.

[Examples 4 to 6 and Comparative Example 1]
Golf balls of Examples 4 to 6 and Comparative Example 1 were obtained in the same manner as Example 1 except that the cover type was as shown in Table 2 below.

[Example 7]
A golf ball of Example 7 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the thickness of the intermediate layer and the thickness of the cover were as shown in Table 3 below.

[Comparative Example 2]
A golf ball of Comparative Example 2 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the thickness of the intermediate layer and the thickness and type of the cover were as shown in Table 3 below.

[Examples 8 to 10]
Golf balls of Examples 8 and 9 were obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the thickness of the reinforcing layer was as shown in Table 3 below. A golf ball of Example 10 was obtained in the same manner as Example 1 except that the reinforcing layer was not provided.

[Example 11]
A golf ball of Example 11 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that a coating composition having a two-component curable urethane resin as a base polymer was used for the reinforcing layer. In the production of the coating composition, first, 116 parts by mass of PTMG and 16 parts by mass of 1,2,6-hexanetriol were dissolved in 120 parts by mass of a solvent (mixed solution of toluene and methyl ethyl ketone). Dibutyltin dilaurate was added to this solution so that its concentration was 0.1% by mass. While maintaining this liquid at 80 ° C., 48 parts by mass of isophorone diisocyanate was added dropwise to obtain a main liquid containing urethane polyol. This urethane polyol had a solid content of 60% by mass, a hydroxyl value of 87 mgKOH / g, and a weight average molecular weight of 7850. This main agent liquid and a curing agent liquid containing isophorone diisocyanate (manufactured by Sumitomo Bayer Urethane Co., Ltd.) were mixed so that the NCO / OH ratio was 1.2. To this solution, a light stabilizer (trade name “Sanol LS770” from Sankyo Co., Ltd.), an ultraviolet absorber (trade name “Cinuvin 900” from Ciba Geigy Co., Ltd.) and a fluorescent whitening agent (trade name “Ubitex OB” from Ciba Geigy Co., Ltd.) Was added to prepare a coating composition. As for the addition amount with respect to 100 parts by mass of the urethane resin component, the light stabilizer is 2 parts by mass, the ultraviolet absorber is 2 parts by mass, and the fluorescent whitening agent is 0.2 parts by mass.

[Comparative Example 3]
In the intermediate layer, 50 parts by mass of ionomer resin (the above-mentioned Himilan 1855), 50 parts by mass of other ionomer resin (the above-mentioned Himilan 1856), 4 parts by mass of titanium dioxide and 0.1 parts by mass of a colorant (Ultramarine) A golf ball of Comparative Example 3 was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the resin composition comprising Blue) was used.

[Shot with driver]
A driver with a metal head was attached to a golf laboratory swing machine. The machine conditions were set so that the head speed was 50 m / sec, the golf ball was hit, and the ball speed immediately after hitting and the flight distance (distance from the launch point to the stationary point) were measured. Average values of 10 measurements are shown in Tables 2 and 3 below.

[Short iron shot]
An approach wedge was attached to the swing machine. Machine conditions were set so that the head speed was 21 m / sec, a golf ball was hit, and the spin speed immediately after hit was measured. Average values of 10 measurements are shown in Tables 2 and 3 below.

[Evaluation of the degree of wrinkle generation]
A pitching wedge was attached to the swing machine. The height of the machine was adjusted so that the golf ball was hit at the leading edge of the club head. Machine conditions were set so that the head speed was 37 m / sec, and a golf ball was hit. The surface of the golf ball was visually observed, and the degree of wrinkle was rated in four stages from A to D according to the following criteria.
A: Almost no wrinkles are generated.
B: Minor wrinkles are generated.
C: Large wrinkles are generated.
D: Large wrinkles are generated and the intermediate layer is exposed.
The results are shown in Tables 2 and 3 below.

[Durability evaluation]
The golf ball was repeatedly collided with the metal plate at a speed of 45 m / s. Durability was rated in four stages from A to D according to the following criteria.
A: No cracks occurred when the number of collisions was 150.
B: Cracks did not occur when the number of collisions was 100 times, but cracks occurred when the number of collisions was 150 times.
C: Cracks did not occur when the number of collisions was 50, but cracks occurred when the number of collisions was 100.
D: Cracking occurs when the number of collisions is 50.
Measurements were made on six golf balls. The most concentrated ratings are shown in Tables 2 and 3 below.

  As is apparent from Tables 2 and 3, the golf ball of the example is excellent in the flight performance when shot with a driver and the spin performance when shot with a short iron. From this evaluation result, the superiority of the present invention is clear.

  The golf ball according to the present invention is particularly suitable for use in golf competitions.

FIG. 1 is a partially cutaway sectional view showing a golf ball according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Explanation of symbols

2 ... Golf ball 4 ... Core 6 ... Intermediate layer 8 ... Reinforcement layer 10 ... Cover 12 ... Dimple 14 ... Land

Claims (4)

A spherical core, an intermediate layer located outside the core, a reinforcing layer located outside the intermediate layer, and a cover located outside the reinforcing layer,
The main component of the base polymer of this intermediate layer is an ionomer resin,
The intermediate layer has a hardness Hm measured by a Shore D hardness meter of 62 or more,
The cover has a hardness Hc measured with a Shore D hardness tester of 55 or less,
The weight Wc of this cover is 3.2 g or less,
The ratio (Hc / Wc) of the cover hardness Hc to the mass Wc (g) is 10.0 or more,
The main component of the base polymer of this cover is a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer,
The base polymer of the reinforcing layer is a thermosetting resin,
This thermosetting resin is a two-component curable epoxy resin obtained by curing a bisphenol A type epoxy resin with a curing agent that is a polyamidoamine or a modified product thereof ,
A golf ball in which a ratio of an epoxy equivalent of the bisphenol A type epoxy resin and an amine active hydrogen equivalent of the curing agent is 1.0 / 1.4 or more and 1.0 / 1.0 or less .   The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein the cover has a thickness Tc of 0.6 mm or less.   The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein the reinforcing layer has a thickness of 3 μm to 50 μm. The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein the reinforcing layer has a tensile strength of 150 kgf / cm ² or more and 500 kgf / cm ² or less.

Images