JP4387994B2 - Criticality alarm device and test method thereof - Google Patents

Criticality alarm device and test method thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4387994B2
JP4387994B2 JP2005212876A JP2005212876A JP4387994B2 JP 4387994 B2 JP4387994 B2 JP 4387994B2 JP 2005212876 A JP2005212876 A JP 2005212876A JP 2005212876 A JP2005212876 A JP 2005212876A JP 4387994 B2 JP4387994 B2 JP 4387994B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
circuit
alarm
test
criticality
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2005212876A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007033068A (en
Inventor
雅人 石井
好夫 北
繁宏 河野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP2005212876A priority Critical patent/JP4387994B2/en
Publication of JP2007033068A publication Critical patent/JP2007033068A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4387994B2 publication Critical patent/JP4387994B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E30/00Energy generation of nuclear origin
    • Y02E30/30Nuclear fission reactors

Landscapes

  • Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Radiation (AREA)

Description

本発明は、核燃料等の放射性物質取扱い施設における臨界事故検出のために用いられる臨界警報装置およびその試験方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a criticality alarm device used for detecting a criticality accident in a facility for handling radioactive materials such as nuclear fuel and a test method thereof.

再処理工場、核燃料廃棄物処理工場等においては、臨界警報装置を設置して、施設内に集められた核燃料から放出される放射線量を監視して核燃料が臨界に達するのを未然に防止している(特許文献1)。   In reprocessing plants, nuclear fuel waste processing plants, etc., criticality warning devices are installed to monitor the amount of radiation emitted from nuclear fuel collected in the facility and prevent nuclear fuel from reaching criticality. (Patent Document 1).

従来の臨界警報装置は一般に、図6に示すように、監視対象機器の周辺に設置した3台一組の放射線検出器1a,1b,1cと、3台一組の2/3論理回路2a,2b,2cと、1台の警報発生回路3と、1式の警告灯4およびホーンブロア5と、1台の試験回路6から構成されている(特許文献2)。   As shown in FIG. 6, the conventional criticality alarm device generally includes a set of three radiation detectors 1a, 1b, 1c installed around the monitored device, and a set of two 2/3 logic circuits 2a, 2b, 2c, one alarm generation circuit 3, one set of warning light 4 and horn blower 5, and one test circuit 6 (Patent Document 2).

放射線検出器1a,1b,1cで検出される放射線のレベルがある一定量を超えた場合、放射線検出器1a,1b,1cから2/3論理回路2a,2b,2cに信号が出力される。2/3論理回路2a,2b,2cは、3台の検出器1a,1b,1cの内2台以上の検出器からの信号出力が同時に一定時間継続した場合、臨界事象として判断し、警報発生回路3に出力する。この場合、放射線検出器1台だけの事象は無視される。これは、臨界警報の発報は、関係者の避難を促す重要な警報であり、ノイズなどによる誤警報は極力排除する必要があるためである。同様の理由で、警報発生回路3は、2/3論理回路3台のうち2台以上からの信号出力が同時に一定時間継続した場合、臨界事象と判断してホーンブロア5および警告灯4を動作させる。
特許第3046434号公報 特開2000-131488号公報
When the radiation levels detected by the radiation detectors 1a, 1b, and 1c exceed a certain amount, signals are output from the radiation detectors 1a, 1b, and 1c to the 2/3 logic circuits 2a, 2b, and 2c. The 2/3 logic circuits 2a, 2b, 2c are judged as critical events when a signal output from two or more of the three detectors 1a, 1b, 1c continues simultaneously for a certain period of time, and an alarm is generated. Output to circuit 3. In this case, the event of only one radiation detector is ignored. This is because the critical warning is an important warning that prompts the evacuation of related persons, and it is necessary to eliminate false alarms due to noise or the like as much as possible. For the same reason, the alarm generating circuit 3 determines that it is a critical event and operates the horn blower 5 and the warning lamp 4 when the signal output from two or more of the 2/3 logic circuits continues for a certain time at the same time. .
Japanese Patent No. 3046434 JP 2000-131488 A

上述した従来の臨界警報装置においては、警報発生回路3が1台であるため、回路の健全性を確認する試験時に一時的に警報出力を遮断する場合、又は、故障などのため回路を交換する場合、2/3論理回路の出力を直接警告灯4等に接続し人間系で対応している。   In the above-described conventional criticality alarm device, since the alarm generation circuit 3 is one, when the alarm output is temporarily interrupted at the time of the test for checking the soundness of the circuit, or the circuit is replaced due to a failure or the like. In this case, the output of the 2/3 logic circuit is directly connected to the warning light 4 or the like to cope with a human system.

警報発生回路2を2台とし、冗長化して健全性試験の自動化を行う場合には、一時的に人間系で臨界警報に対応する必要はないが、下記の問題がある。
すなわち、健全性試験対象の警報発生回路の入力部信号ラインを遮断し、模擬信号を入力する場合、他の1台の警報発生回路が電源断などの不動作状態の場合、試験の間臨界警報機能を喪失する。
When two alarm generation circuits 2 are used and redundancy is performed to automate the soundness test, it is not necessary to temporarily respond to the critical alarm in the human system, but there are the following problems.
That is, when the input signal line of the alarm generation circuit subject to the soundness test is cut off and a simulated signal is input, when the other alarm generation circuit is in a non-operating state such as a power failure, a criticality alarm is given during the test. Loss of function.

また、誤操作などにより、試験時2台同時に、警報発生回路の入出力信号ラインが遮断された場合、試験の間、臨界警報機能が喪失する。
さらにまた、一方の警報発生回路の健全性を検査する場合、他方の警報発生回路の電源は正常だが機能に異常がある場合、試験の間一時的に臨界警報機能を喪失する。
Also, if the input / output signal lines of the alarm generation circuit are shut off simultaneously during testing due to erroneous operation, the critical alarm function is lost during the test.
Furthermore, when checking the soundness of one alarm generation circuit, if the power supply of the other alarm generation circuit is normal but the function is abnormal, the critical alarm function is temporarily lost during the test.

本発明は上述した課題を解決するためになされたものであり、警報発生回路の試験時にも常に臨界警報機能が維持される臨界警報装置およびその試験方法を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a criticality alarm device that maintains a criticality alarm function even during a test of an alarm generation circuit, and a test method therefor.

上記課題を解決するために、請求項1記載の発明は、複数の放射線検出器と、前記複数の放射線検出器に接続され前記複数の放射線検出器のうち所定数のものが検出信号を生じたときに信号を出力する複数の論理回路と、前記複数の論理回路に接続され前記複数の論理回路のうちの所定数のものが信号を生じたときに警報信号を出力する2台の警報発生回路と、前記警報発生回路の試験を行う試験回路とを備え、前記警報発生回路の健全性試験時あるいは交換時に所定の1台の警報出力を遮断する際に他の1台が不動作状態か否かを検知し他の1台が動作状態の場合のみ警報出力を遮断するようにした構成とする。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, the invention according to claim 1 is characterized in that a plurality of radiation detectors and a predetermined number of the plurality of radiation detectors connected to the plurality of radiation detectors generate detection signals. A plurality of logic circuits that sometimes output signals, and two alarm generation circuits that are connected to the plurality of logic circuits and that output a warning signal when a predetermined number of the plurality of logic circuits generate a signal And a test circuit for testing the alarm generation circuit, and when one alarm output is shut off at the time of soundness test or replacement of the alarm generation circuit, the other unit is in an inoperative state. And the alarm output is cut off only when the other unit is in an operating state.

請求項3記載の発明は、複数の放射線検出器と、前記複数の放射線検出器に接続され前記複数の放射線検出器のうち所定数のものが検出信号を生じたときに信号を出力する複数の論理回路と、前記複数の論理回路に接続され前記複数の論理回路のうち所定数のものが検出信号を生じたときに警報信号を出力する警報発生回路と、前記警報発生回路に並列に接続されたバックアップ回路と、前記警報発生回路の試験を行う試験回路とを備えた臨界警報装置の試験方法において、前記バックアップ回路の動作の健全性を確認し、その後前記警報発生回路の警報出力を遮断して前記警報発生回路の健全性試験を行う方法とする。   The invention according to claim 3 is a plurality of radiation detectors and a plurality of radiation detectors connected to the plurality of radiation detectors and outputting a signal when a predetermined number of the plurality of radiation detectors generate a detection signal. A logic circuit, an alarm generation circuit that outputs an alarm signal when a predetermined number of the plurality of logic circuits are connected to the plurality of logic circuits and generates a detection signal, and is connected in parallel to the alarm generation circuit In the critical alarm device test method comprising a backup circuit and a test circuit for testing the alarm generation circuit, the soundness of the operation of the backup circuit is confirmed, and then the alarm output of the alarm generation circuit is shut off. Thus, a soundness test of the alarm generation circuit is performed.

本発明によれば、警報発生回路の試験時にも常に臨界警報機能が維持される臨界警報装置およびその試験方法を提供することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a criticality alarm device in which the criticality alarm function is always maintained even during a test of an alarm generation circuit and a test method therefor.

以下、本発明に係る臨界警報装置およびその試験方法の2つの実施の形態について図面を参照して説明する。
(第1の実施の形態)
本実施の形態の臨界警報装置は、図1に示すように、放射線検出器1a,1b,1c、2/3論理回路2a,2b,2c、警報発生回路3a,3b、試験回路6、OR回路7、警告灯4およびホーンブロア5から構成されている。
Hereinafter, two embodiments of a criticality alarm device and a test method thereof according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
(First embodiment)
As shown in FIG. 1, the criticality alarm device of the present embodiment includes radiation detectors 1a, 1b, 1c, 2/3 logic circuits 2a, 2b, 2c, alarm generation circuits 3a, 3b, a test circuit 6, and an OR circuit. 7, a warning light 4 and a horn blower 5.

図2に、警報発生回路3a,3bおよび試験回路6の構成を示す。
警報発生回路3a,3bはそれぞれ、入力部AND回路21a,21b、2/3臨界判定回路22a,22b、出力部AND回路23a,23b、NOT回路24a,24b、および電源25a,25bを備えている。
FIG. 2 shows configurations of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b and the test circuit 6.
Each of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b includes input unit AND circuits 21a and 21b, 2/3 criticality determination circuits 22a and 22b, output unit AND circuits 23a and 23b, NOT circuits 24a and 24b, and power supplies 25a and 25b. .

試験回路6は、模擬信号発生回路35、模擬信号発生回路入力切換スイッチ31、模擬信号発生回路出力切換スイッチ32、警報発生回路入出力遮断信号切換スイッチ33、警報発生回路電源モニタ信号切換スイッチ34、タイマー36,37、警報発生回路切換スイッチ38、2/3臨界判定回路試験スイッチ39、および試験条件判定AND回路40を備えている。   The test circuit 6 includes a simulation signal generation circuit 35, a simulation signal generation circuit input changeover switch 31, a simulation signal generation circuit output changeover switch 32, an alarm generation circuit input / output cutoff signal changeover switch 33, an alarm generation circuit power supply monitor signal changeover switch 34, Timers 36 and 37, an alarm generation circuit selector switch 38, a 2/3 criticality judgment circuit test switch 39, and a test condition judgment AND circuit 40 are provided.

以上のような構成において、警報発生回路3aの健全性を確認する場合、試験回路6からの模擬信号を2/3臨界判定回路22aに入力し、同回路が正常に動作するか否かを検査する。その場合、次のように操作する。   In the configuration as described above, when checking the soundness of the alarm generation circuit 3a, the simulation signal from the test circuit 6 is input to the 2/3 criticality judgment circuit 22a to check whether or not the circuit operates normally. To do. In that case, it operates as follows.

すなわち模擬信号で臨界警報が出ないように、試験回路6から信号を出し、警報発生回路3aの出力部に設けたAND回路23aで信号の遮断を行う。
また、警報発生回路3aの2/3臨界判定回路22aの入力側からの信号で試験が妨害されることのないように、入力側からの信号をAND回路21aを使用して遮断する。
That is, a signal is output from the test circuit 6 so that a critical alarm is not output by the simulated signal, and the signal is interrupted by the AND circuit 23a provided at the output of the alarm generation circuit 3a.
Further, the signal from the input side is blocked using the AND circuit 21a so that the test is not disturbed by the signal from the input side of the 2/3 criticality judgment circuit 22a of the alarm generation circuit 3a.

警報発生回路3a,3bの健全性試験を行うとき、他方の警報発生回路3a,3bが電源断等の不動作の場合、試験のため当該警報発生回路3a,3bの信号を遮断すると、一時的に臨界警報機能を喪失する。そのため、下記のようになっている。   When the soundness test of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b is performed, if the other alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b are inoperative such as a power failure, the signal of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b is temporarily cut off for the test. The critical alarm function is lost. Therefore, it is as follows.

すなわち他方の警報発生回路の電源が断している場合、2/3臨界判定回路22a,22bの入出力部は遮断できない。
また、切換スイッチ31により、警報発生回路3a,3bの試験は、2台のうちどちらか一方しか実施できない回路構成であり、同時に2系統の入出力信号が遮断されることはなく、臨界警報機能が喪失することはない。
That is, when the power supply of the other alarm generation circuit is cut off, the input / output units of the 2/3 criticality judgment circuits 22a and 22b cannot be cut off.
In addition, the alarm switch 3a, 3b can be tested only by one of the two switches by the changeover switch 31, and the input / output signals of the two systems are not interrupted at the same time. Will not be lost.

動作の詳細を説明すると、まず試験回路6において切換スイッチ38で、警報発生回路3a,3bのどちらの試験を行うか選択する。スイッチ選択により、試験回路6は切換スイッチ31,32,33,34を介して、例えば警報発生回路3aに接続される。切換スイッチ34は、試験回路6を警報発生回路3bの電源25bの状態を示す信号線に接続する。その後、タイマー37で設定された切換終了時間ののちに2/3臨界判定回路試験スイッチ39がONとなり、試験条件判定AND回路40において試験開始条件と電源25bがONのANDから、電源25bがONの場合のみ試験が開始できる。ON信号は切換スイッチ33を介して、NOT回路24aで反転し、警報発生回路3aの入力部AND回路21aおよび出力部AND回路23aに導かれ、信号ラインを遮断する。   The details of the operation will be described. First, in the test circuit 6, the switch 38 is used to select which test of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b is to be performed. By the switch selection, the test circuit 6 is connected to, for example, the alarm generation circuit 3a via the changeover switches 31, 32, 33, and 34. The changeover switch 34 connects the test circuit 6 to a signal line indicating the state of the power supply 25b of the alarm generation circuit 3b. After that, after the switching end time set by the timer 37, the 2/3 criticality judgment circuit test switch 39 is turned on, and the test condition judgment AND circuit 40 turns on the power supply 25b from the AND of the test start condition and the power supply 25b. The test can be started only in the case of. The ON signal is inverted by the NOT circuit 24a via the changeover switch 33, and is led to the input unit AND circuit 21a and the output unit AND circuit 23a of the alarm generation circuit 3a to cut off the signal line.

次に、タイマー36で設定された遅れ時間ののちに模擬信号発生回路35から、試験用信号を切換える切換スイッチ32を介して警報発生回路3aの2/3臨界判定回路22aに入力する。そして2/3臨界判定回路22aの出力を切換スイッチ31を経由して模擬信号発生回路35に入力し、図3に示すように健全性を判定する。図3(a)は、3ラインのうちの1ラインだけの信号では所定の時間(ΔT)内に2/3臨界判定回路22aから出力信号(破線)が出ないことを示し、図3(b)は、3ライン内いずれか2ライン以上(図の場合a.bライン)の信号出力が出た場合、所定の時間(ΔT)内に、2/3臨界判定回路22aから出力信号(破線)が出ることを示し、これによって警報発生回路3aが正常であると判断する。   Next, after the delay time set by the timer 36, the simulation signal generation circuit 35 inputs the signal to the 2/3 criticality determination circuit 22a of the alarm generation circuit 3a through the changeover switch 32 for switching the test signal. Then, the output of the 2/3 criticality determination circuit 22a is input to the simulation signal generation circuit 35 via the changeover switch 31, and the soundness is determined as shown in FIG. FIG. 3A shows that an output signal (broken line) is not output from the 2/3 criticality judgment circuit 22a within a predetermined time (ΔT) with a signal of only one line out of the three lines. ) Is output from the 2/3 criticality judgment circuit 22a (dashed line) within a predetermined time (ΔT) when a signal output of any 2 lines or more (a.b line in the figure) in 3 lines is output. It is determined that the alarm generation circuit 3a is normal.

このように、他の臨界警報発生回路3bの電源25bのON,OFFを確認し、警報発生回路3aの健全性試験を実施する。
警報発生回路3bの健全性は、切換スイッチ38で、bを選択することにより、警報発生回路3aと同様に健全性試験が実施される。
In this way, the ON / OFF state of the power supply 25b of the other critical alarm generation circuit 3b is confirmed, and the soundness test of the alarm generation circuit 3a is performed.
As for the soundness of the alarm generation circuit 3b, the soundness test is performed in the same manner as the alarm generation circuit 3a by selecting b with the changeover switch 38.

本実施の形態の臨界警報装置においては、警報発生回路3a,3bの健全性試験時、他の警報発生回路の電源がダウンしている場合には、当該の警報発生回路の試験を行わず、2/3臨界判定回路22a,22bの入出力部分の信号を維持して、試験時の一時的な臨界警報機能の喪失を防ぐことができる。   In the criticality alarm device of the present embodiment, during the soundness test of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b, when the power supply of other alarm generation circuits is down, the alarm generation circuit is not tested. The signals at the input / output portions of the 2/3 criticality judgment circuits 22a and 22b can be maintained to prevent temporary loss of criticality alarm functions during testing.

また、切換スイッチ31,32,33,34により、2台の警報発生回路3a,3bの試験を同時に行うことはできず、誤操作などにより同時に2台の入出力信号が遮断して一時的に臨界警報機能が喪失することを防ぐことができる。   In addition, the switches 31, 32, 33 and 34 cannot test the two alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b at the same time, and the two input / output signals are cut off at the same time due to an erroneous operation or the like. It is possible to prevent the alarm function from being lost.

(第2の実施の形態)
次に、本発明に係る臨界警報装置およびその試験方法の第2の実施の形態を図4、図5を用いて説明する。なお第1の実施の形態と同一の構成には同一の符号を付し、重複する説明は省略する。
(Second Embodiment)
Next, a second embodiment of the criticality alarm device and the test method thereof according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the structure same as 1st Embodiment, and the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted.

第2の実施形態の臨界警報装置は、図4に示すように、第1の実施の形態の臨界警報装置に比べて、警報発生回路3aがさらにタイマー27を備え、バックアップ回路26および出力部OR回路28が接続される。
また、試験回路6は第1の実施の形態の臨界警報装置に比べて、さらにバックアップ回路試験スイッチ41およびバックアップ回路試験AND回路42を備えている。
As shown in FIG. 4, in the critical alarm device of the second embodiment, the alarm generation circuit 3a further includes a timer 27 as compared with the critical alarm device of the first embodiment, and includes a backup circuit 26 and an output unit OR. A circuit 28 is connected.
The test circuit 6 further includes a backup circuit test switch 41 and a backup circuit test AND circuit 42, as compared with the criticality alarm device of the first embodiment.

第2の実施の形態の臨界警報装置は、警報発生回路3aの健全性試験を実施する場合、バックアップ回路26を並列接続した後、一連の健全性試験を第1の実施の形態と同様に行う。バックアップ回路26の出力は、出力部OR回路28によって警報発生回路3aからの信号とのORを取って出力される。バックアップ回路26は、警報発生回路3aのみに設置する。この理由は、警報発生回路3aの健全性が確認された場合、警報発生回路3bの健全性試験は、健全性の確認された警報発生回路3aを使用して行うことができるためである。   When performing the soundness test of the alarm generation circuit 3a, the criticality alarm device of the second embodiment performs a series of soundness tests as in the first embodiment after the backup circuit 26 is connected in parallel. . The output of the backup circuit 26 is ORed with the signal from the alarm generation circuit 3a by the output unit OR circuit 28 and output. The backup circuit 26 is installed only in the alarm generation circuit 3a. This is because, when the soundness of the alarm generation circuit 3a is confirmed, the soundness test of the alarm generation circuit 3b can be performed using the alarm generation circuit 3a whose soundness has been confirmed.

バックアップ回路26の健全性は、試験の前に確認することにより、臨界警報機能は確保されており、2台のうちの他の警報発生回路3bの健全性如何に関係なく試験が実施できる。   The criticality alarm function is ensured by confirming the soundness of the backup circuit 26 before the test, and the test can be performed regardless of the soundness of the other alarm generation circuits 3b of the two units.

以下に各回路の動作を説明する。
試験回路6の切換スイッチ38で、警報発生回路3a,3bのどちらの試験を行うか選択する。このスイッチ選択により、試験回路6は切換スイッチ31,32,33,34で、例えば、警報発生回路3aに接続される。その後、タイマー37に設定された切換終了時間ののちに2/3臨界判定回路試験スイッチ39がONとなり、切換スイッチ33を経由して、バックアップ回路26が動作状態になる。すなわち、図5(a)に示すバックアップ回路26で、入力部AND回路50と出力部AND回路52がON状態になり動作状態となる。図5(b)の回路構成でも、同様に動作状態になる。
The operation of each circuit will be described below.
The changeover switch 38 of the test circuit 6 selects which of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b is to be tested. By this switch selection, the test circuit 6 is connected to, for example, the alarm generation circuit 3a by the changeover switches 31, 32, 33, and 34. Thereafter, after the switching end time set in the timer 37, the 2/3 criticality judgment circuit test switch 39 is turned on, and the backup circuit 26 enters the operating state via the changeover switch 33. That is, in the backup circuit 26 shown in FIG. 5A, the input unit AND circuit 50 and the output unit AND circuit 52 are turned on and are in an operating state. Even in the circuit configuration of FIG.

次にタイマー27で設定された時間ののちNOT回路24aを経由して、警報発生回路3aの入力部AND回路21aおよび出力部AND回路23aに信号を送り、信号ラインを遮断状態にする。さらにタイマー36で設定した時間ののちに試験回路6の模擬信号発生回路35からの信号を、警報発生回路3aの2/3臨界判定回路22aに入力する。そして2/3臨界判定回路22aの出力を切換スイッチ31を経由して模擬信号発生回路35に入力し、図3に示したように健全性を判定する。   Next, after a time set by the timer 27, a signal is sent to the input unit AND circuit 21a and the output unit AND circuit 23a of the alarm generation circuit 3a via the NOT circuit 24a to cut off the signal line. Further, after the time set by the timer 36, the signal from the simulation signal generation circuit 35 of the test circuit 6 is input to the 2/3 criticality determination circuit 22a of the alarm generation circuit 3a. Then, the output of the 2/3 criticality determination circuit 22a is input to the simulation signal generation circuit 35 via the changeover switch 31, and the soundness is determined as shown in FIG.

バックアップ回路26の健全性試験は、事前に実施するものとし、バックアップ回路試験スイッチ41をONし、バックアップ回路26の信号ラインが遮断状態の時だけ(この動作はAND回路42で行う。)模擬信号発生回路35をONにして試験を行う。   The soundness test of the backup circuit 26 is performed in advance, and the backup circuit test switch 41 is turned ON and only when the signal line of the backup circuit 26 is in the cut-off state (this operation is performed by the AND circuit 42). The test is performed with the generation circuit 35 turned ON.

本実施の形態の臨界警報装置の試験方法においては、事前に動作確認を行ったバックアップ回路26を並列接続するので、警報発生回路3a,3bの健全性を検査するとき、他の警報発生回路の機能に異常がある場合にも、試験中であっても、臨界警報機能を喪失することがなく、信頼性が向上する。   In the test method for the criticality alarm device of the present embodiment, since the backup circuit 26 that has been confirmed in advance is connected in parallel, when the soundness of the alarm generation circuits 3a and 3b is inspected, Even if the function is abnormal, the critical alarm function is not lost even during the test, and the reliability is improved.

本発明の第1の実施の形態の臨界警報装置の構成を示す図。The figure which shows the structure of the criticality alarm apparatus of the 1st Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第1の実施の形態の臨界警報装置における警報発生回路および試験回路の構成を示す図。The figure which shows the structure of the alarm generation circuit and test circuit in the criticality alarm apparatus of the 1st Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第1の実施の形態の臨界警報装置の動作を説明する図。The figure explaining operation | movement of the criticality alarm apparatus of the 1st Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第2の実施の形態の臨界警報装置の試験方法の回路構成を示す図。The figure which shows the circuit structure of the test method of the criticality alarm apparatus of the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第2の実施の形態の臨界警報装置の試験方法におけるバックアップ回路の構成を示す図。The figure which shows the structure of the backup circuit in the test method of the criticality alarm apparatus of the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 従来の臨界警報装置の構成を示す図。The figure which shows the structure of the conventional criticality alarm apparatus.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1a,1b,1c…放射線検出器、2a,2b,2c…2/3論理回路、3,3a,3b…警報発生回路、4…警告灯、5…ホーンブロア、6…試験回路、7…OR回路、21a,21b…入力部AND回路、22a,22b…2/3臨界判定回路、23a,23b…出力部AND回路、24a,24b…NOT回路、25a,25b…電源、26…バックアップ回路、27…タイマー、28…出力部OR回路、31…模擬信号発生回路入力切換スイッチ、32…模擬信号発生回路出力切換スイッチ、33…警報発生回路入出力遮断信号切換スイッチ、34…警報発生回路電源モニタ信号切換スイッチ、35…模擬信号発生回路、36…タイマー、37…タイマー、38…警報発生回路切換スイッチ、39…2/3臨界判定回路試験スイッチ、40…試験条件判定AND回路、41…バックアップ回路試験スイッチ、42…バックアップ回路試験AND回路、50…入力部AND回路、51…2/3臨界判定回路、52…出力部AND回路、53…表示用LED、54…出力部OR回路。   DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1a, 1b, 1c ... Radiation detector, 2a, 2b, 2c ... 2/3 logic circuit, 3, 3a, 3b ... Alarm generating circuit, 4 ... Warning light, 5 ... Horn blower, 6 ... Test circuit, 7 ... OR circuit , 21a, 21b ... input unit AND circuit, 22a, 22b ... 2/3 criticality judgment circuit, 23a, 23b ... output unit AND circuit, 24a, 24b ... NOT circuit, 25a, 25b ... power supply, 26 ... backup circuit, 27 ... Timer ... 28 ... Output unit OR circuit, 31 ... Simulated signal generating circuit input selector switch, 32 ... Simulated signal generating circuit output selector switch, 33 ... Alarm generating circuit I / O cutoff signal selector switch, 34 ... Alarm generating circuit power monitor signal selector Switch 35 ... Simulated signal generating circuit 36 ... Timer 37 ... Timer 38 ... Alarm generating circuit selector switch 39 ... 2/3 criticality judgment circuit test switch 40 ... Test condition judgment Constant AND circuit, 41 ... Backup circuit test switch, 42 ... Backup circuit test AND circuit, 50 ... Input part AND circuit, 51 ... 2/3 criticality judgment circuit, 52 ... Output part AND circuit, 53 ... Display LED, 54 ... Output unit OR circuit.

Claims (4)

複数の放射線検出器と、前記複数の放射線検出器に接続され前記複数の放射線検出器のうち所定数のものが検出信号を生じたときに信号を出力する複数の論理回路と、前記複数の論理回路に接続され前記複数の論理回路のうちの所定数のものが信号を生じたときに警報信号を出力する複数台の警報発生回路と、前記警報発生回路の試験を行う試験回路とを備え、前記警報発生回路の所定の1台の警報出力を遮断する際に他の警報発生回路が不動作状態か否かを検知し少なくとも1台が動作状態の場合のみ警報出力を遮断するようにしたことを特徴とする臨界警報装置。   A plurality of radiation detectors, a plurality of logic circuits connected to the plurality of radiation detectors and outputting a signal when a predetermined number of the plurality of radiation detectors generate a detection signal, and the plurality of logics A plurality of alarm generating circuits that output an alarm signal when a predetermined number of the plurality of logic circuits connected to the circuit generates a signal, and a test circuit that tests the alarm generating circuit, When the predetermined alarm output of the alarm generation circuit is cut off, it is detected whether the other alarm generation circuit is in an inoperative state, and the alarm output is cut off only when at least one of the alarm generation circuits is in an operating state. A criticality alarm device. 前記警報出力の遮断は切換スイッチにより、同時に複数台の警報発生回路の出力を遮断できない回路構成としたことを特徴とする請求項1記載の臨界警報装置。   2. The critical alarm device according to claim 1, wherein the alarm output is blocked by a changeover switch so that the outputs of a plurality of alarm generation circuits cannot be blocked simultaneously. 複数の放射線検出器と、前記複数の放射線検出器に接続され前記複数の放射線検出器のうち所定数のものが検出信号を生じたときに信号を出力する複数の論理回路と、前記複数の論理回路に接続され前記複数の論理回路のうち所定数のものが検出信号を生じたときに警報信号を出力する警報発生回路と、前記警報発生回路に並列に接続されたバックアップ回路と、前記警報発生回路の試験を行う試験回路とを備えた臨界警報装置の試験方法において、前記バックアップ回路の動作の健全性を確認し、その後前記警報発生回路の警報出力を遮断して前記警報発生回路の健全性試験を行うことを特徴とする臨界警報装置の試験方法。   A plurality of radiation detectors, a plurality of logic circuits connected to the plurality of radiation detectors and outputting a signal when a predetermined number of the plurality of radiation detectors generate a detection signal, and the plurality of logics An alarm generation circuit for outputting an alarm signal when a predetermined number of the logic circuits connected to the circuit generates a detection signal, a backup circuit connected in parallel to the alarm generation circuit, and the alarm generation In a test method for a criticality alarm device comprising a test circuit for testing a circuit, the soundness of the alarm generation circuit is confirmed by checking the soundness of the operation of the backup circuit and then shutting off the alarm output of the alarm generation circuit A test method for a criticality alarm device, characterized by performing a test. 前記バックアップ回路は2/3ロジック回路たまはOR回路を備えていることを特徴とする請求項3記載の臨界警報装置の試験方法。   4. The test method for a criticality alarm device according to claim 3, wherein the backup circuit includes a 2/3 logic circuit or an OR circuit.
JP2005212876A 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Criticality alarm device and test method thereof Expired - Fee Related JP4387994B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005212876A JP4387994B2 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Criticality alarm device and test method thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005212876A JP4387994B2 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Criticality alarm device and test method thereof

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007033068A JP2007033068A (en) 2007-02-08
JP4387994B2 true JP4387994B2 (en) 2009-12-24

Family

ID=37792533

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005212876A Expired - Fee Related JP4387994B2 (en) 2005-07-22 2005-07-22 Criticality alarm device and test method thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4387994B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106814387A (en) * 2017-01-24 2017-06-09 陕西卫峰核电子有限公司 A kind of nuclear critical accident detector

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105448368A (en) * 2015-11-12 2016-03-30 中广核工程有限公司 Nuclear power plant diversity driving system, nuclear power plant diversity driving method and diversity protection system

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106814387A (en) * 2017-01-24 2017-06-09 陕西卫峰核电子有限公司 A kind of nuclear critical accident detector

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007033068A (en) 2007-02-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4583224A (en) Fault tolerable redundancy control
US7606672B2 (en) Plant protective instrumentation equipment
US20180211734A1 (en) Reactor protection-processor-to-reactor-trip breaker interface and method for operating the same
KR101023533B1 (en) Automatic train control real time remote restore system and its control method thereof
JP4387994B2 (en) Criticality alarm device and test method thereof
CN105738790A (en) Vehicle current transformer self test method, device and system
KR101902577B1 (en) Method for checking functions of control system with components
JP2009192339A (en) Criticality alarm device and criticality alarm generation unit
JP3968291B2 (en) Monitoring device
JP3792416B2 (en) Criticality alarm device
US20040034476A1 (en) Seismic emergency response system for use in a wafer fabrication plant
JP5660832B2 (en) Nuclear power plant control system and nuclear power plant inspection method
JP6692251B2 (en) Criticality warning device and criticality warning method
CN111552263A (en) Method, computer-readable storage medium, and system for inspecting an industrial facility
KR101743532B1 (en) System for determining electrical safety and method therefor
JPH0956051A (en) Automatic monitoring system for digital protective relay device
KR102089090B1 (en) Method and apparatus for synchronizing status detection in a power system
JP2006065646A (en) Alarm evaluation method and device
Smith Reliability of software-based fire and gas detection control systems
JP2007042017A (en) Fault diagnostic system, fault diagnostic method, and fault diagnostic program
JPH07281735A (en) Method and device for deciding abnormal level
JPS6233813B2 (en)
JPS6140953B2 (en)
JPS6252537B2 (en)
JP2009201249A (en) Digital protection and control device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20070302

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20071218

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20090820

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20090908

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091001

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121009

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131009

Year of fee payment: 4

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees