JP4002387B2 - Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device - Google Patents

Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4002387B2
JP4002387B2 JP2000211655A JP2000211655A JP4002387B2 JP 4002387 B2 JP4002387 B2 JP 4002387B2 JP 2000211655 A JP2000211655 A JP 2000211655A JP 2000211655 A JP2000211655 A JP 2000211655A JP 4002387 B2 JP4002387 B2 JP 4002387B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
grade
scratch
micro
area
agricultural product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2000211655A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2002022664A (en
Inventor
誠司 仲村
Original Assignee
株式会社マキ製作所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社マキ製作所 filed Critical 株式会社マキ製作所
Priority to JP2000211655A priority Critical patent/JP4002387B2/en
Publication of JP2002022664A publication Critical patent/JP2002022664A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4002387B2 publication Critical patent/JP4002387B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、柑橘類等の農産物において知られる黒点病由来の微小傷が農産物の取り引き市場においての評価に影響することを考慮して、かかる微小傷を有する農産物を、選果場における選別・仕分けの作業に反映できるようにした技術に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
農産物の価値は、取り引き市場での需要の多寡や評価により決まるのが普通であり、その評価結果は、生産者の労働価値(対価)に反映し、ひいては労働意欲を高めることにもつながるため、できるだけ取り引き市場での結果を生産者への対価に反映できるように、生産現場に近接して設けられる選果場での選別・仕分けの作業場での選別・仕分けの項目が選ばれている。
【0003】
このような選別項目としては、一般に、農産物の大きさや重量等の形状的な範疇に属する階級要素と、糖度等の味やさらには視覚的な要素が与える満足感などの感情的な等級要素とがあることが広く知られており、農産物の選別,判定,仕分けの作業を行う工程では、上記の階級要素や等級要素を、できるだけ正確に精度よく検出することができるようにされた装置や、その作業工程を迅速に行うように工夫された方法や装置などが従来さまざまに提案され、例えば、従来の農産物の選別・仕分けのうちで果実表面の傷の有無やその程度(大きさ)を考慮した提案もされている(特開平3−226658号公報等)。
【0004】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかし、公差等を考慮した寸法精度が求められる工業製品とは異なり、農産物は、一つ一つその大きさや熟度などが違うことは避けられないという特有の問題をもっている。
【0005】
例えば、一例的に柑橘類について言えば、図1に示すように、その果実表皮に小さな黒点が微小傷2として多数点在するように現れる黒点病という疾病のあることが知られており、この黒点病起因の黒点(上述しているようにこれを「傷」として考える)が多数点在しているミカン1等は、取引市場においての評価は低いが、従来は、この問題に対する具体的な対処方法は提案されてなく、かかる黒点病の問題についての等級評価を考えるという課題も認識されていない。
【0006】
つまり従来の傷選別においては、検出した傷の総面積(又は比率)を目安にして等級評価を行っているため、一般傷,普通傷3等と称される大きな傷と、黒点病のような一つ一つの傷の面積が小さい微小傷2とは特に区別されておらず、微小傷2が多数存在してもその総面積はあまり大きな値にはならないので、下位の等級に分類されることがなかったのである。したがって、普通傷3等の大きな傷が仮に一つ存在しているミカン1と、普通傷3はないが黒点病の微小傷2が多数あるミカン1とにおいて、後者のミカンの黒点の総面積が小さいと、前者よりも高い等級に選別されることになり、これが取引市場での評価と合致していない結果を招くことがあった。
【0007】
本願発明は、上記のように、従来は全く考慮されていなかった黒点病による微小傷を、農産物の選別・仕分けの要素の一つとして考えてその等級選別に反映させ、取引市場における評価を、生産者への対価により正確に反映できるようにすることを目的としてなされたものである。
【0008】
【課題を解決するための手段】
上記の目的を達成するための本願の発明の特徴は以下の通りである。
【0009】
(1)農産物を撮像した画像中に複数存在する傷画像を個々に検出し、前記個々の傷画像の面積を予め定めた微小傷の面積閾値と比較して該微小傷とそれ以上の面積の大きな傷とを判別し、該微小傷と判別された微小傷群の合計総面積及び/又は総個数を、当該農産物を選別仕分けする等級判定の要素とすることを特徴とする農産物の等級判定方法。
【0010】
上記において、1個の傷が微小傷であるかそれ以外の普通傷,一般傷であるか否かを判別する方式は、限定されるものではないが、例えば、ミカンをドットマトリックスとして撮像した画像の各画素についての彩度(あるいは色相)を二値化して、通常のミカンの表皮部分と傷部分の違いをまず判別し、次に傷と判別された画素の連続する大きさ(広さ)を予め定めた閾値と比較することで、微小傷であるか、それよりも大きい普通傷,一般傷であるかを判別することで行うことができる。黒点病由来の微小傷であるか否かは、撮像画像の解像度にもよるが、本願発明者の経験によれば例えば2mm2 /個程度を黒点の上限目安とすることができる。
【0011】
微小傷と判別された微小傷群により当該農産物の等級を判定する場合は、この微小傷群の合計総面積、あるいは総個数の少なくともいずれか一方を用いることができる。総面積を用いるか総個数を用いるかは対象とする農産物等によっても一概には言えないが、同じ個数であっても、例えば1mm2以下の微小傷が点在する場合と、2mm2に近い微小傷が点在する場合とでは、2mm2に近い微小傷が点在する方が見た目に劣って見えることから、総面積を用いるのが好ましい場合が多い。なお両者のいずれも評価に用いることもでき、この場合には、より評価が低く示された等級判定結果を採用するようにすることが好ましい。
【0012】
なお、この発明は、微小傷を等級判定の要素の一つに用いることを特定しているが、その他の等級判定要素、例えば、色,内部品質,異形状などの他の要素を等級判定に併用することを排除するものではないことは勿論であるし、大きさ,重量などの階級要素を、農産物の総合的な仕分選別に併用することを排除するものでないことも当然である。
【0013】
本願は上記の発明(1)に加えて更に以下の発明を特徴とするものである。
【0014】
(2)上記(1)の農産物撮像画像中に含まれる傷を判別する面積閾値が、黒点病由来の傷を微小傷群に含むように設定されていることを特徴とする上記(1)の農産物の等級判定方法。
【0015】
(3)上記微小傷群の合計総面積及び/又は微小傷の総個数が予め定めた等級格付け基準値よりも大である場合に、当該農産物の等級を格下げ判定することを特徴とする上記(2)の農産物の等級判定方法
(4)上記(1)〜(3)のいずれかに記載した等級判定方法が、みかん等の柑橘類、リンゴあるいはエンドウの等級判定に用いられることを特徴とする等級判定方法。
【0016】
本願は、上記の各等級判定方法の発明とは別に、以下の農産物の等級判定装置を特徴とするものである。
【0017】
(5)農産物の撮像手段と、撮像画像の中に部分的に分かれて存在する複数の傷画像を個々に検出しかつこの検出した各傷画像を予め定めた面積閾値と比べて微小傷とそれ以上の面積の大きな傷とに判別する第1の比較手段と、該判別された微小傷群の合計総面積及び/又は総個数を予め定めた等級格付け基準値と比較する第2の比較手段と、該第2の比較手段の出力に応じて当該農産物の等級格付けを判定する等級格付け手段を有することを特徴とする農産物の等級判定装置。
【0018】
(6)上記発明(5)の農産物第1の比較手段は、黒点病に起因する傷を微小傷群に含むように面積閾値が設定されていることを特徴とする農産物の等級判定装置。
【0019】
【発明の実施の形態】
実施形態1
図2〜図6に示される本例は、図1に示した大きな傷である普通傷3と黒点病由来の微小傷2の一方があるミカン1i 、両方の傷があるミカン1j 、両方ともにないミカン1k を考えて、これらがどのように等級判定されるかを説明するためのものである。なお本例においては、これらの傷の有無と共にミカンの着色度も検出し、等級判定の要素としている場合として示した。
【0020】
本例を示した図2において、選別仕分のための選別コンベア10上を搬送されるミカン1は、所定の撮像位置においてCCDカメラ11によりその外観が撮像される。この撮像の方法,手段(照明系12、ミラー13など)は、既知のものを用いることができ、必要に応じて平面画像のみ、側面画像を含む3面、あるいは5面、さらには底面を含む多面の撮像が行われるが、撮像面の広さは本願発明と直接関係がない。
【0021】
CCDカメラ11に取り込まれた撮像画像は、本例ではドットマトリックスの画素の集合からなる画像情報として、図示しないコンピュータの画像処理系に画像入力される。
【0022】
そしてこの画像処理系においては、画像入力に基づいて第一には、バックグラウンドと農産物を区別するために画像情報の各画素信号を、ステップ(「S」とする:以下同じ)201で二値化し、S202で農産物の外形を判別すると共に処理領域をS203で確定し、外形の判別情報に基づいて農産物の大きさをS204で判別して、S205で階級が判定される。また、変形の度合をS206で判定する。
【0023】
一方、上記画像入力に基づいて第二には、S210において画像情報の各画素信号の色変換を行い、S211で傷検出を行って、上記S203で確定された処理領域内の傷を検出する(S212:傷害検出)。また、上記画像情報の各画素信号の色変換の後の情報を用いて色ヒストグラムをとり(S213)、その着色度を検出する(S214)。
【0024】
本例においては、以上のようにして検出・判別されたミカンの変形の程度(S206の情報)、傷害(S212の情報)及び着色度(S214の情報)から等級が判定される(S216:等級判定)。
【0025】
そして、これらの階級判定(S205)及び等級判定(S216)の結果に基づいて、最終的な仕分区分が判定されて仕分出力(選別仕分)の信号が出力される。
【0026】
以上の選別仕分けのための撮像画像の画像処理、及び等階級の判別の基準は従来さまざまに設定されているが、本例では、傷検出のための上記S211において特徴的な処理が行われる。
【0027】
すなわち、S210において色変換された画像情報により、ミカンの通常の表皮の色とそうでない色の部分とが検出され、後者は傷として認識される。そして更に、その検出・認識された傷は、図3に示したように、連続する画素の大きさから、本例では傷と認識される部分の連続が0〜2の範囲であれば微小傷を判断し、3以上であれば普通傷と判断するようにコンピュータの画像処理系を設定している。そして、微小傷に含まれる傷と普通傷に含まれる傷は、図4に示すように、それぞれにカウント(加算)される。
【0028】
そして、上記のように普通傷の数(あるいは面積)、微小傷の数(あるいは面積)、着色度の程度、のそれぞれを等級判定の要素とする場合には、例えば図5に示したように、等級区分1,等級区分2,・・・・・・等級区分nという各等級区分に応じた普通傷、微小傷、着色度別の等級判定基準を定めれば、これのいずれに該当するかの比較によって、一つ一つのミカンの該当等級を判定することができることになる。図6はこのような等級判定の決定手順の一例を示したものである。
【0029】
以上のようにして行われる等級判定方法によれば、黒点病による傷害が取引市場において等級格下げの評価となっていたことを、選果場における選別仕分けの段階に反映することができ、従来は行われていなかった問題を、生産者の評価に反映できるという優れた効果をもたらすことができる。
【0030】
【発明の効果】
本願の発明によれば、従来は課題の認識さえも全く示されていない黒点病に由来する農産物表皮に現れる黒点が、取引市場では等級評価の格下げにつながっているという問題を効果的に解消して、生産者に対するより精度の高い評価に反映させることができるという利点がある。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の対象とする黒点病の黒点が表皮に現れたミカンの外観を説明するための図。
【図2】本発明の方法を適用した場合のシステムの概要を示した図。
【図3】微小傷を判別するための一例を説明するための図。
【図4】傷の大小によりどのような扱いをするのかを説明するための図。
【図5】等級区分の一例を示した図。
【図6】等級区分を判定する際のカスケード的判定手順を示した図。
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In consideration of the fact that micro-scratches derived from sunspot disease known in agricultural products such as citrus fruits have an impact on the evaluation of agricultural products in the market, the agricultural products having such micro-scratches are selected and sorted in a fruit selection field. It relates to technology that can be reflected in work.
[0002]
[Prior art]
The value of agricultural products is usually determined by the amount of demand and evaluation in the trading market, and the evaluation results are reflected in the labor value (consideration) of producers, which in turn leads to increased work motivation. In order to reflect the results in the trading market as much as possible in consideration for the producers, the items of selection / sorting in the selection / sorting workshop in the selection area close to the production site are selected.
[0003]
Such selection items generally include class elements belonging to geometric categories such as size and weight of agricultural products, and emotional grade elements such as taste such as sugar content and satisfaction given by visual elements. It is widely known that there is a device that can detect the above-mentioned class elements and grade elements as accurately and accurately as possible in the process of selecting, judging and sorting agricultural products, Various methods and devices that have been devised to quickly perform the work process have been proposed in the past. For example, in the conventional sorting and sorting of agricultural products, the presence or extent (size) of the surface of the fruit is considered. Have also been proposed (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 3-226658).
[0004]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, unlike industrial products that require dimensional accuracy in consideration of tolerances, agricultural products have the unique problem that their size and maturity are inevitably different.
[0005]
For example, in the case of citrus fruits as an example, as shown in FIG. 1, it is known that there is a disease called sunspot disease in which many small black spots appear as small scratches 2 on the fruit skin. Citrus 1 etc., which is dotted with many black spots caused by disease (think of this as “scratches” as described above), has a low reputation in the trading market, but conventionally, this is a concrete countermeasure for this problem. No method has been proposed, and the problem of considering grade evaluation for such sunspot problems has not been recognized.
[0006]
In other words, in conventional wound screening, grade evaluation is performed using the total area (or ratio) of detected wounds as a guide, so large wounds called general wounds, normal wounds 3 etc., and black spot disease It is not particularly distinguished from small scratches 2 where the area of each scratch is small, and even if there are a large number of small scratches 2, the total area does not become very large, so it should be classified into a lower grade There was no. Therefore, in the mandarin orange 1 in which one large wound such as the ordinary wound 3 exists, and in the mandarin orange 1 that does not have the ordinary wound 3 but has a large number of micro-scratches 2 of the sunspot disease, the total area of sun spots of the latter mandarin orange is If it is small, it will be sorted into a higher grade than the former, which may lead to results that are not consistent with the market ratings.
[0007]
As described above, the present invention is considered as one of the elements of sorting and sorting of agricultural products, and the evaluation in the trading market is considered as one of the elements of sorting and sorting agricultural products. It was made for the purpose of being able to accurately reflect the consideration to the producer.
[0008]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to achieve the above object, the features of the present invention are as follows.
[0009]
(1) A plurality of scratch images existing in an image of agricultural products are individually detected, and the area of each scratch image is compared with a predetermined micro-scratch area threshold, and the area of the micro-scratch and the area larger than that is determined. A method for determining the grade of agricultural products, characterized by discriminating large scratches, and using the total total area and / or total number of micro-scratch groups determined to be micro-scratches as an element of grade determination for sorting and sorting the agricultural products. .
[0010]
In the above, the method for determining whether a single scratch is a micro-scratch, or a normal scratch other than that, or a general scratch is not limited, but, for example, an image obtained by capturing a mandarin orange as a dot matrix The saturation (or hue) of each pixel is binarized to first determine the difference between the skin portion and the scratched portion of a normal mandarin orange, and then the continuous size (width) of the pixels determined to be scratched Is compared with a predetermined threshold value to determine whether it is a minute wound, a normal wound, or a general wound larger than that. Whether or not it is a microscratch derived from a sunspot disease depends on the resolution of the captured image, but according to the experience of the inventor of the present application, for example, about 2 mm 2 / piece can be set as the upper limit guide for the sunspot.
[0011]
When determining the grade of the agricultural product based on the group of micro-scratches determined to be micro-scratches, at least one of the total total area or the total number of micro-scratch groups can be used. Whether to use the total area or the total number is unclear depending on the target agricultural products, etc., but even if the number is the same, for example, when there are small scratches of 1 mm 2 or less, it is close to 2 mm 2 In the case where minute flaws are scattered, it is often preferable to use the total area because it is inferior in appearance to those having flaws close to 2 mm 2 . Both of these can also be used for evaluation. In this case, it is preferable to adopt a grade determination result that is shown to have a lower evaluation.
[0012]
Although the present invention specifies that a micro-flaw is used as one of the elements for grade determination, other grade determination elements, for example, other elements such as color, internal quality, irregular shape, etc. are used for the grade determination. Of course, it is not excluded that they are used together, and it is natural that class elements such as size and weight are not excluded from the combined sorting of agricultural products.
[0013]
The present application is characterized by the following invention in addition to the above invention (1).
[0014]
(2) The above-mentioned (1) characterized in that the area threshold value for discriminating the wounds included in the agricultural product picked-up image of (1) is set so as to include the black spot disease-derived wounds in the micro wound group. Agricultural product grade judgment method.
[0015]
(3) When the total total area and / or the total number of micro-scratches is greater than a predetermined grade rating reference value, the grade of the agricultural product is determined to be downgraded ((3) 2) Agricultural product grade determination method (4) The grade determination method described in any one of (1) to (3) above is used for grade determination of citrus fruits such as oranges, apples or peas. Judgment method.
[0016]
The present application is characterized by the following agricultural product grade determination device, apart from the above-described inventions of the respective grade determination methods.
[0017]
(5) Agricultural product imaging means, and a plurality of scratch images that are partially divided in the captured image are individually detected, and each detected scratch image is compared with a predetermined area threshold and a micro-scratch First comparing means for discriminating the above-mentioned large scratches, and second comparing means for comparing the total total area and / or total number of the discriminated micro-flaw groups with a predetermined rating rating reference value; An agricultural product grade judging device comprising grade rating means for judging the grade rating of the agricultural product in accordance with the output of the second comparing means.
[0018]
(6) The agricultural product first determination means of the invention (5) is characterized in that the area threshold is set so that the wound caused by sunspot disease is included in the group of minute wounds.
[0019]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Embodiment 1
The present example shown in FIG. 2 to FIG. 6 does not have the mandarin orange 1i having either the normal wound 3 which is the large wound shown in FIG. 1 or the micro-scratch 2 derived from sunspot disease, the mandarin orange 1j having both wounds. This is to explain how these are graded considering the oranges 1k. In the present example, the coloration degree of the mandarin orange is detected together with the presence or absence of these scratches, and is shown as the case of the grade determination.
[0020]
In FIG. 2 showing this example, the appearance of the mandarin orange 1 conveyed on the sorting conveyor 10 for sorting and sorting is imaged by the CCD camera 11 at a predetermined imaging position. As this imaging method and means (illumination system 12, mirror 13, etc.), known ones can be used, and if necessary, only a plane image, three surfaces including a side image, five surfaces, or even a bottom surface are included. Although multi-plane imaging is performed, the area of the imaging plane is not directly related to the present invention.
[0021]
In this example, the captured image captured by the CCD camera 11 is input to a computer image processing system (not shown) as image information including a set of pixels of a dot matrix.
[0022]
In this image processing system, first, based on the image input, each pixel signal of the image information is binarized in step 201 (hereinafter referred to as “S”; the same applies hereinafter) 201 in order to distinguish the background from the agricultural products. In step S202, the outline of the agricultural product is determined and the processing area is determined in step S203. The size of the agricultural product is determined in step S204 based on the external shape determination information, and the class is determined in step S205. Further, the degree of deformation is determined in S206.
[0023]
On the other hand, based on the image input, second, color conversion of each pixel signal of the image information is performed in S210, scratch detection is performed in S211, and a scratch in the processing region determined in S203 is detected ( S212: Injury detection). Further, a color histogram is taken using the information after color conversion of each pixel signal of the image information (S213), and the color level is detected (S214).
[0024]
In this example, the grade is determined from the degree of deformation of the mandarin orange (information in S206), the injury (information in S212), and the degree of coloring (information in S214) detected as described above (S216: Grade). Judgment).
[0025]
Then, based on the results of the class determination (S205) and the class determination (S216), the final sorting classification is determined and a sorting output (sorting sorting) signal is output.
[0026]
The image processing of the picked-up image for sorting and sorting as described above and the standard for discrimination of equal classes have been set in various ways. In this example, characteristic processing is performed in S211 for detecting a scratch.
[0027]
That is, the normal epidermis color of the mandarin orange and the non-colored portion of the mandarin orange are detected from the image information subjected to color conversion in S210, and the latter is recognized as a flaw. Further, as shown in FIG. 3, the detected / recognized flaw is a minute flaw if the continuous portion of the portion recognized as a flaw in this example is in the range of 0 to 2 due to the size of continuous pixels. The image processing system of the computer is set so as to determine that it is a normal scratch if it is 3 or more. Then, the scratches included in the micro-scratches and the scratches included in the normal scratches are counted (added) as shown in FIG.
[0028]
Then, as described above, when each of the number (or area) of normal scratches, the number (or area) of fine scratches, and the degree of coloring is used as an element for grade determination as described above, for example, as shown in FIG. , Grade category 1, grade category 2, ..... If the grade judgment standard according to each grade category called grade category n is determined according to each grade category, which of these is applicable? By comparing the above, it is possible to determine the corresponding grade of each tangerine. FIG. 6 shows an example of the determination procedure for such grade determination.
[0029]
According to the grade determination method performed as described above, the fact that the injury caused by sunspot disease has been evaluated as a grade downgrade in the trading market can be reflected in the sorting stage in the selection area. It is possible to bring about an excellent effect that problems that have not been made can be reflected in the evaluation of the producer.
[0030]
【The invention's effect】
According to the invention of the present application, the sunspot that appears in the agricultural product epidermis derived from sunspot disease, which has not been shown even the recognition of the problem in the past, effectively solved the problem that the grade evaluation was downgraded in the trading market. Thus, there is an advantage that it can be reflected in a more accurate evaluation for the producer.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the appearance of a mandarin orange in which a black spot of a black spot disease that is a subject of the present invention appears on the epidermis.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an overview of a system when the method of the present invention is applied.
FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining an example for discriminating minute scratches.
FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining how to handle depending on the size of a wound;
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of grade classification.
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a cascading determination procedure when determining a classification.

Claims (6)

農産物を撮像した画像中に複数存在する傷画像を個々に検出し、前記個々の傷画像の面積を予め定めた微小傷の面積閾値と比較して該微小傷とそれ以上の面積の大きな傷とを判別し、該微小傷と判別された微小傷群の合計総面積及び/又は総個数を、当該農産物を選別仕分けする等級判定の要素とすることを特徴とする農産物の等級判定方法。A plurality of scratch images present in images of agricultural products are individually detected, and the area of each scratch image is compared with a predetermined micro-scratch area threshold, and the micro-scratch and a scratch having a larger area than that are And a total total area and / or total number of micro-scratch groups determined to be micro-scratches is used as a class determination element for sorting and sorting the agricultural products. 前記農産物撮像画像中に含まれる微小傷を判別する面積閾値が、黒点病由来の傷を微小傷群に含むように設定されていることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の農産物の等級判定方法。The method according to claim 1, wherein an area threshold value for discriminating micro-scratches included in the farm product captured image is set so as to include black spot-derived scratches in the micro-scratch group. . 前記微小傷群の合計総面積及び/又は微小傷の総個数が予め定めた等級格付け基準値よりも大である場合に、当該農産物の等級を格下げ判定することを特徴とする請求項2に記載した等級判定方法。The grade of the said agricultural product is judged to be downgraded when the total total area of the said micro wound group and / or the total number of micro scratches are larger than the predetermined grade rating reference value. Grade judgment method. 前記請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載した等級判定方法は、みかん等の柑橘類、リンゴあるいはエンドウの等級判定に用いられることを特徴とする等級判定方法。The grade judging method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 is used for judging grades of citrus fruits such as mandarin oranges, apples or peas. 農産物の撮像手段と、撮像画像の中に部分的に分かれて存在する複数の傷画像を個々に検出しかつこの検出した各傷画像を予め定めた面積閾値と比べて微小傷とそれ以上の面積の大きな傷とに判別する第1の比較手段と、該判別された微小傷群の合計総面積及び/又は総個数を予め定めた等級格付け基準値と比較する第2の比較手段と、該第2の比較手段の出力に応じて当該農産物の等級格付けを判定する等級格付け手段を有することを特徴とする農産物の等級判定装置。Agricultural product imaging means and a plurality of wound images that are partially divided and present in the captured image are individually detected, and each detected scratch image is compared with a predetermined area threshold and a small scratch and an area larger than that First comparing means for discriminating a large flaw, and second comparing means for comparing the total total area and / or total number of the discriminated micro-flaw group with a predetermined grading reference value, An agricultural product grade judging device comprising grade ranking means for judging the grade of the agricultural product according to the output of the comparison means. 前記農産物第1の比較手段は、黒点病に起因する傷を微小傷群に含むように面積閾値が設定されていることを特徴とする請求項5に記載の農産物の等級判定装置。6. The agricultural product grade determination apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the agricultural product first comparing means has an area threshold set so as to include a wound caused by sunspot disease in a small wound group.
JP2000211655A 2000-07-12 2000-07-12 Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device Expired - Fee Related JP4002387B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000211655A JP4002387B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2000-07-12 Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000211655A JP4002387B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2000-07-12 Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2002022664A JP2002022664A (en) 2002-01-23
JP4002387B2 true JP4002387B2 (en) 2007-10-31

Family

ID=18707720

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2000211655A Expired - Fee Related JP4002387B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2000-07-12 Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4002387B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4258225B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2009-04-30 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Vehicle position detection apparatus and method
JP7207948B2 (en) * 2018-10-30 2023-01-18 株式会社ミツトヨ Appearance inspection method and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2002022664A (en) 2002-01-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Omid et al. An expert egg grading system based on machine vision and artificial intelligence techniques
Sahu et al. Defect identification and maturity detection of mango fruits using image analysis
Makky et al. Development of an automatic grading machine for oil palm fresh fruits bunches (FFBs) based on machine vision
Blasco et al. Machine vision system for automatic quality grading of fruit
Noordam et al. High-speed potato grading and quality inspection based on a color vision system
AU2013347861B2 (en) Scoring and controlling quality of food products
JP2583146B2 (en) Top cleanliness inspection method
Iqbal et al. Classification of selected citrus fruits based on color using machine vision system
Sahu et al. Identification and classification of mango fruits using image processing
Mustafa et al. Image processing of an agriculture produce: Determination of size and ripeness of a banana
Kim et al. Detection of pinholes in almonds through x–ray imaging
Sharma et al. Grain quality detection by using image processing for public distribution
Teoh et al. Image processing and analysis techniques for estimating weight of Chokanan mangoes
CN111582359A (en) Image identification method and device, electronic equipment and medium
Arlimatti Window based method for automatic classification of apple fruit
Alejandro et al. Grading and sorting of Carabao mangoes using probabilistic neural network
Xu et al. Fiber-image analysis part I: Fiber-image enhancement
JPH08189904A (en) Surface defect detector
Aleixos et al. Assessment of citrus fruit quality using a real-time machine vision system
JP4002387B2 (en) Agricultural product grade judging method and grade judging device
Niskanen et al. Experiments with SOM based inspection of wood
Keagy et al. Expanded image database of pistachio x-ray images and classification by conventional methods
Pearson et al. Automated sorting of almonds with embedded shell by laser transmittance imaging
Ibrahim et al. Non-Destructive Quality Inspection of Potato Tubers Using Automated Vision System
Zhang et al. Date quality evaluation using short-wave infrared imaging

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050401

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070720

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20070807

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20070817

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100824

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4002387

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100824

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100824

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110824

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120824

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130824

Year of fee payment: 6

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees