JP3876997B2 - Crest artificial leaf - Google Patents

Crest artificial leaf Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3876997B2
JP3876997B2 JP2004076337A JP2004076337A JP3876997B2 JP 3876997 B2 JP3876997 B2 JP 3876997B2 JP 2004076337 A JP2004076337 A JP 2004076337A JP 2004076337 A JP2004076337 A JP 2004076337A JP 3876997 B2 JP3876997 B2 JP 3876997B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
crest
concrete block
type artificial
shore
offshore
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP2004076337A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005264501A (en
Inventor
方哉 福濱
寿 人見
謙一 鳥居
正司 山本
芳郎 清水
明徳 米田
浩一 山形
利幸 大森
高明 宇多
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
Original Assignee
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management filed Critical National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
Priority to JP2004076337A priority Critical patent/JP3876997B2/en
Publication of JP2005264501A publication Critical patent/JP2005264501A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3876997B2 publication Critical patent/JP3876997B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Revetment (AREA)

Description

この発明は、波浪等によって砂浜侵食や高潮被害を被っている海又は湖沼の沿岸域において、その対策のために施工される保全構造物であるクレスト型人工リーフに関するものである。 The present invention relates to a crest-type artificial reef that is a conservation structure to be constructed for countermeasures in a coastal area of a sea or a lake that is affected by sandy beach erosion or storm surge damage due to waves or the like.

海岸保全施設、特に高潮対策及び侵食対策に効果的な構造物として、従来から用いられているものに離岸堤や人工リーフがある。離岸堤は、昭和40年代からの歴史があり、その海浜保全効果・高潮防止効果が非常に高いことは、多くの実績が示すとおりである。しかし、時代の変化とともに、高機能な海岸施設が求められるにつれて場所的には景観の阻害という面から悪影響を及ぼす場合がある。すなわち、図8に示すように水面上数メートルの高さとなる場合が多く、周辺の景観を著しく損なうという欠陥がある。また、異型ブロックを密集させる構造物であることから、局所流による洗堀を受けやすく、ブロックの沈下・散乱が発生して機能低下を招くことが多い。これらの状況によっては補修費が継続的に発生し、初期建設費が比較的に安価であることの利点を損なっている。   As structures effective for coastal conservation facilities, especially for countermeasures against storm surges and erosion, offshore dikes and artificial reefs are conventionally used. The offshore dyke has a history since the Showa 40s, and as its results show that its beach conservation effect and storm surge prevention effect are very high. However, with the changing times, there are cases where the location of a coastal facility is adversely affected as a highly functional coastal facility is required. That is, as shown in FIG. 8, there are many cases where the height is several meters above the water surface, and there is a defect that the surrounding scenery is remarkably damaged. In addition, since it is a structure in which atypical blocks are densely packed, it is susceptible to scouring due to local flow, and block settlement and scattering often occur, leading to functional deterioration. In these situations, repair costs are continuously incurred and the advantages of relatively low initial construction costs are lost.

人工リーフは、離岸堤のもつ欠点である景観の阻害がなく、沈下・散乱による機能低下を緩和する構造物として昭和60年代から建設されている。しかし、これは没水型の構造物であり、景観を全く阻害しないという利点はあるが、岸向きに強い流れが発生すると、背後の海浜の保全や利用の面で問題となる場合がある。すなわち、図9に示すように砕波後における岸向きの強い流れによってしばしば岸側の水位上昇を助長している。また、本来、波浪低減によってもたらされるはずの後背地の海浜保全、すなわち離岸堤は波浪低減した背後に砂の堆積をもたらしているが、岸向きに強い水流が発生する人工リーフは満足な堆砂機能を得られていない。   Artificial reefs have been constructed since the 1960s as structures that relieve functional degradation due to settlement and scattering, without obstructing the landscape, which is a drawback of offshore dikes. However, this is a submerged structure and has the advantage of not obstructing the landscape at all. However, if a strong current flows toward the shore, it may cause problems in terms of conservation and use of the beach behind. That is, as shown in FIG. 9, the water level rise on the shore side is often promoted by the strong flow toward the shore after breaking. In addition, beach protection in the hinterland that should be brought about by wave reduction, that is, the offshore dike causes sand accumulation behind the wave reduction, but artificial reefs that generate strong water flow toward the shore are satisfactory. Sand function is not obtained.

そこでこの発明は、前記従来のものの問題点を解決し、背後の水位上昇が少なく、堆砂機能を有し、かつ景観を阻害しない構造物を提供することを目的とする。   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to solve the problems of the prior art, and to provide a structure that has a low water level rise behind, has a sedimentation function, and does not hinder the landscape.

前記課題を解決するために、請求項1に記載の発明は、波浪等によって砂浜侵食や高潮被害を被っている海又は湖沼の沿岸域において、その対策のために施工される保全構造物である人工リーフであって、多数のコンクリートブロックをその下面の捨石を被覆するように沿岸に沿って所定長さにわたり、かつ所定幅で設置し、該コンクリートブロック体の長さ方向の上面にクレストを水面から突出させて設け、このクレストは、その上面が沖側から岸側に向けて所定の勾配で上向き傾斜したテーパ面と平坦面から形成され、該テーパ面はその勾配がクレストの幅に対して高さが1/3程度となっているとともに、平坦面より大きい面積を有していて、岸向きに流れる強い波浪をテーパ面によって砕波して減波化することを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, the invention according to claim 1 is a conservation structure constructed for countermeasures in a coastal area of a sea or a lake that has been eroded by sand or storms due to waves or the like. It is an artificial reef, and a large number of concrete blocks are installed over a predetermined length and with a predetermined width along the coast so as to cover the rubble on the lower surface, and the crest is placed on the upper surface in the longitudinal direction of the concrete block body. The crest is formed of a tapered surface and a flat surface whose upper surface is inclined upward at a predetermined gradient from the offshore side to the shore side, and the tapered surface has a gradient with respect to the width of the crest. The height is about 1/3 and the area is larger than the flat surface, and the strong waves flowing toward the shore are broken by the tapered surface to reduce the wave .

請求項2に記載の発明は、請求項1において、クレストは、コンクリートブロック体の長さ方向の上面に幅方向に所定の間隔をおいて複数列設けられていることを特徴とする。請求項3に記載の発明は、請求項1又は2において、クレストは、平均潮位で水面から0.5m程度突出するように高さが設定されていることを特徴とする。   A second aspect of the present invention is characterized in that, in the first aspect, the crest is provided in a plurality of rows at a predetermined interval in the width direction on the upper surface in the length direction of the concrete block body. The invention described in claim 3 is characterized in that, in claim 1 or 2, the height of the crest is set so as to protrude about 0.5 m from the water surface at an average tide level.

請求項に記載の発明は、請求項1ないしのいずれかにおいて、クレストは、コンクリートブロックの上面に一体に形成されていることを特徴とする。 According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to third aspects, the crest is integrally formed on the upper surface of the concrete block.

請求項に記載の発明は、請求項1ないしのいずれかにおいて、沖側からクレストを含むコンクリートブロック及びクレストの両側から岸側に設置されるコンクリートブロックは、これらコンクリートブロックから岸側に設置されるコンクリートブロックよりも大型であることを特徴とする。

The invention according to claim 5 is the invention according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the concrete block including the crest from the offshore side and the concrete block installed on the shore side from both sides of the crest are installed on the shore side from these concrete blocks. It is characterized in that it is larger than the concrete block to be made.

この発明は、前記のような構成からなるので、従来型人工リーフの岸向き波浪の流速をクレストにより大幅に低減することができる。したがって、背後の水位上昇を少なく、堆砂機能を有して、背後の侵食を効果的に防止する効果がある。また、クレストは、水面上の露出も少なく済むので、離岸堤に比べて景観を阻害することもない。さらに、この発明は、高い消波性を有して反射波が小さいとともに、沈下等も少なくて良好な魚場となる可能性も高い。しかも、視認できるので船舶航行の危険性も小さいという効果がある。   Since the present invention is configured as described above, the flow velocity of the shoreward waves of the conventional artificial reef can be greatly reduced by the crest. Therefore, there is an effect of effectively preventing the erosion of the back by reducing the rise of the water level behind and having a sedimentation function. Crest also has less exposure on the surface of the water, so it does not hinder the landscape compared to the offshore bank. Furthermore, the present invention has a high wave extinction property, a small reflected wave, and a high possibility of becoming a good fish place with less subsidence. And since it can visually recognize, there exists an effect that the danger of ship navigation is also small.

この発明の一実施の形態を、添付図面を参照して説明する。   An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

図1はクレスト型人工リーフの縦断側面図、図2はその平面図である。1はクレスト型人工リーフで、波浪等によって砂浜侵食や高潮被害を被る海岸の沿岸に沿って、沿岸から所定距離はなれた沖合い位置に設置されている。通常、海底は沿岸(陸側)から沖側に向けて徐々に傾斜した砂浜となっているが、この砂浜上には多数の捨石2が人工リーフ1を設置する範囲である所定長さにわたり、かつ所定幅で、敷設されている。そして、これら捨石2の上に捨石を被覆するように多数のコンクリートブロック3が設置されている。   FIG. 1 is a longitudinal side view of a crest-type artificial leaf, and FIG. 2 is a plan view thereof. Reference numeral 1 denotes a crest-type artificial reef, which is installed at an offshore position at a predetermined distance from the coast along the coast where the beach is eroded or damaged by storm surges. Usually, the sea bottom is a sandy beach that is gradually inclined from the coast (land side) toward the offshore side, but on this sandy beach, a large number of rubble 2 is in the range where the artificial reef 1 is installed, over a predetermined length, And it is laid with a predetermined width. A large number of concrete blocks 3 are installed on the rubble 2 so as to cover the rubble.

これら多数のコンクリートブロック3からなるコンクリートブロック体の幅方向の中央部であって、長さ方向の上面にはクレスト5a,5bが幅方向に所定の間隔をおいて列状に、水面から突出してコンクリートブロック3と一体に設けられている。クレスト5a,5bの間隔としては10m程度が好ましい。また、クレスト5a,5bは、平均潮位で水面から0.5m程度突出するようにその天端高さが設定されるのが好ましい。図1において潮位を示すH.H.W.Lは統計した期間中における最高潮位の中で、最も高い潮位、H.W.Lは大潮における満潮位の長年の平均値(塑望平均満潮位)、L.W.Lは大潮における干潮位の長年の平均値(塑望平均干潮位)、M.W.Lは平均潮位、T.Pは平均海面(陸地の標高の基準面)をそれぞれ表している。前記の0.5mはクレスト5a,5bの天端高さ0.657m−平均潮位0.157mとして求められる。   The crests 5a and 5b are arranged in a row at predetermined intervals in the width direction on the upper surface in the width direction of the concrete block body made of a large number of concrete blocks 3 in the width direction. It is provided integrally with the concrete block 3. The distance between the crests 5a and 5b is preferably about 10 m. Moreover, it is preferable that the crests 5a and 5b have their top heights set so as to protrude about 0.5 m from the water surface at an average tide level. HHWL, which shows the tide level in Fig. 1, is the highest tide level among the highest tide levels during the statistical period, HWL is the long-term average value of the high tide level at the tide (plastic desired average high tide level), and LWL is the long-term low tide level at the tide. Mean value (plastic desired mean low tide level), MWL is mean tide level, and TP is mean sea level (land surface altitude reference plane). The above-mentioned 0.5 m is obtained as the crest heights of the crests 5 a and 5 b of 0.657 m−average tide level 0.157 m.

クレスト5a,5bは、その上面が沖側から岸側に向けて所定の勾配で上向き傾斜したテーパ面6と平坦面7から形成されている。テーパ面6の勾配はクレスト5a,5bの幅を3としたときに高さを1とするのが好ましい(1:3)。クレスト5a,5bの上面にテーパ面6を形成したのは効果的な砕波のためである。テーパ面を形成しない場合には防波堤のようになって強い波を直接受け易いが、前記のような勾配のテーパ面とすると強い波でも減波化することが期待できる。前記のような勾配のテーパ面はクレスト5a,5bだけでなく、図1において示すようにコンクリートブロック3でも形成され、これらの部分でも砕波効果をあげている。   The crests 5a and 5b are formed of a tapered surface 6 and a flat surface 7 whose upper surfaces are inclined upward at a predetermined gradient from the offshore side to the shore side. The slope of the taper surface 6 is preferably set to 1 when the width of the crests 5a and 5b is 3 (1: 3). The tapered surface 6 is formed on the upper surfaces of the crests 5a and 5b for effective breaking. When the tapered surface is not formed, it becomes like a breakwater and it is easy to receive strong waves directly. However, if the tapered surface has the gradient as described above, it can be expected that even strong waves are reduced. The tapered surface having the above-described gradient is formed not only in the crests 5a and 5b but also in the concrete block 3 as shown in FIG.

沖側からクレスト5a,5bを含むコンクリートブロック3及びクレスト5a,5bの両側から岸側に設置されるコンクリートブロック3は、これらコンクリートブロックから岸側に設置されるコンクリートブロックよりも大型に形成されている。これは沖側のコンクリートブロックは沖からの強い波を受けるので、それに対応できる大きさとしたいためである。そのためクレスト5a,5bで防がれている陸側は強い波を受けることが少なくなるので、小型のコンクリートブロックでもよくなる。   The concrete block 3 including the crests 5a and 5b from the offshore side and the concrete block 3 installed on the shore side from both sides of the crests 5a and 5b are formed larger than the concrete blocks installed on the shore side from these concrete blocks. Yes. This is because the offshore concrete block receives strong waves from the offshore, so we want to be able to cope with it. Therefore, since the land side protected by the crests 5a and 5b is less likely to receive strong waves, a small concrete block may be used.

クレスト型人工リーフ1においては、前記のようにコンクリートブロック体の上面にクレスト5a,5bが2列にわたり、水面から突出して設けられているので、岸向きに強い波浪の流れがあってもクレスト5a,5bによってそれを砕波し、岸側の流れを穏やかにすることが可能となる。そのため背後の海浜に砂の堆積もなく、岸側の水位上昇も極端に高くなることがないので、後背地の海浜保全にも支障がなくなる。また、クレスト5a,5bを設けているが、水面から突出するのが極めて僅かなので、景観を阻害することもない。   In the crest-type artificial leaf 1, the crests 5a and 5b are provided on the upper surface of the concrete block body so as to protrude from the water surface as described above, so that even if there is a strong wave flow toward the shore, the crest 5a , 5b makes it possible to break the waves and calm the shore-side flow. Therefore, there is no accumulation of sand on the back beach, and the water level rise on the shore side does not become extremely high. Moreover, although crest 5a, 5b is provided, since it protrudes very slightly from the water surface, a landscape is not inhibited.

すなわち、このことを図3に示す実験ケースの模式図(現地スケール)に基づく水理実験によって説明する。
(1)水理模型実験によるクレストの効果検討
平面実験水槽に砂浜と5基の離岸堤の模型を作成し、波浪を当てて背後の海浜の変化を比較検討する水理実験を行った(移動床実験)。実験ケースは下記の表1、及び図3に示す8ケースである。実験の結果、従来型の人工リーフは背後の海浜地形を保全し難くクレストを付ける必要があること、またクレストは低いクレスト2列が最も効果的であることがわかった(図4)。図4は人工リーフ背後の地形変化の比較を示すものであり、これによればケースB3の低いクレスト2列の場合、土量の変化率が1.02を超えて最も大きいことがわかる。すなわち、実験当初の土量を1.0とすると、実験後においてはケースA2,A3では土量がどこかに移動してしまい極端に少なくなっているが、ケースB3では土量が保たれて逆に少し増えていることがわかる。
That is, this will be explained by a hydraulic experiment based on a schematic diagram (field scale) of the experimental case shown in FIG.
(1) Examination of crest effect by hydraulic model experiment A model of a sandy beach and five offshore dikes was created in a plane test tank, and a hydraulic experiment was conducted to compare the changes of the beach behind the waves. Moving bed experiment). The experimental cases are 8 cases shown in Table 1 below and FIG. As a result of experiments, it was found that conventional artificial reefs are difficult to preserve the beach terrain behind and need to be crested, and that two crests with low crest are most effective (Fig. 4). FIG. 4 shows a comparison of the terrain change behind the artificial reef. According to this, it can be seen that in the case of two low crest rows in case B3, the soil volume change rate exceeds 1.02 and is the largest. In other words, if the soil volume at the beginning of the experiment is 1.0, the soil volume moves to somewhere in the cases A2 and A3 after the experiment and is extremely small, but the soil volume is maintained in the case B3. On the contrary, you can see that it has increased a little.

Figure 0003876997
Figure 0003876997

(2)数値計算によるクレスト高さと間隔の検討
クレストの高さと2列とする場合の間隔について、数値シミュレーションによる検討を行った。沖から進入する波浪は人工リーフで砕波して減衰するが、このときに岸向きに強い波浪の流れが発生して海浜を侵食するので、人工リーフ背後における岸向きの流れの低減を性能の評価項目とした。計算結果は、クレストなし(従来型人工リーフ)を1とした場合の流速の比率であるが、クレスト高さは図5より水面上1.0m以上としても流速の低減効果は小さく、水面から0.5m程度突出した高さのときに最大流速と平均流速が均衡して(比率が1.0以下)好ましいことがわかった。また、図6よりクレストを2列の間隔は10mとするのが最大流速・平均流速とも低減して(比率が1.0以下)最も効果的であることがわかった。
(2) Examination of crest height and interval by numerical calculation The crest height and the interval in the case of two rows were examined by numerical simulation. Waves entering from offshore are crushed and attenuated by artificial reefs. At this time, strong waves flow toward the shore and erodes the beach. Item. The calculation result is the ratio of the flow velocity when no crest (conventional artificial leaf) is set to 1, but the effect of reducing the flow velocity is small even if the crest height is 1.0 m or more above the water surface from FIG. It was found that the maximum flow velocity and the average flow velocity are balanced (ratio is 1.0 or less) when the height is about 5 m. In addition, it was found from FIG. 6 that the interval between the two rows of crests is 10 m, which is the most effective because both the maximum flow rate and the average flow rate are reduced (ratio is 1.0 or less).

(3)数値計算によるクレスト高さと潮位の検討
クレストの有無・高さと潮位との関係を、数値シミュレーションによって検討した(図7)。背後の水位上昇の抑制に対してクレストの効果は大きく、潮位の変化はほとんど影響がない。クレストの高さの違いもほとんどないことから、低いクレスト2列の形式が有利であることがわかった。背後に伝達する波高に対しては、潮位の変化は影響があるが、クレストがある場合、伝達率の増加を抑制することができる。この場合もクレスト高さには大きな相違がなく、低いクレスト2列が有効であることが示された。
(3) Examination of crest height and tide level by numerical calculation The relationship between the existence / height of crest and the tide level was examined by numerical simulation (Fig. 7). The effect of crest on the suppression of the rise of the water level behind is large, and changes in the tide level have little effect. Since there is almost no difference in the height of the crest, it was found that the low crest two-row format is advantageous. The change in tide level has an effect on the wave height transmitted to the back, but if there is a crest, the increase in transmission rate can be suppressed. Again, there was no significant difference in crest height, indicating that two lower crest rows are effective.

前記実施の形態ではクレスト型人工リーフ1を専ら海岸に沿って設置した例を示したが、これは一例であって波浪等によって砂浜侵食等を被っている湖沼に設置してもよい。また、コンクリートブロック3のクレスト5a,5bの形状等も好ましい一例を示したにすぎず、この発明は特許請求の範囲に記載した技術的範囲内で実施に際し、種々の変更・修正が可能である。   In the above-described embodiment, an example in which the crest-type artificial reef 1 is installed exclusively along the coast has been shown. However, this is only an example, and the crest-type artificial reef 1 may be installed in a lake that has been eroded by sand or the like. Moreover, the shape of the crests 5a and 5b of the concrete block 3 is only a preferable example, and the present invention can be variously changed and modified when implemented within the technical scope described in the claims. .

この発明の一実施の形態を示すクレスト型人工リーフの縦断側面図である。It is a vertical side view of the crest type artificial leaf which shows one embodiment of this invention. 同上の平面図である。It is a top view same as the above. 実験ケースの模式図である。It is a schematic diagram of an experiment case. 人工リーフ背後の地形変化の比較を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the comparison of the terrain change behind an artificial leaf. リーフクレストの高さの比較を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the comparison of the height of a leaf crest. リーフクレスト2列の間隔の比較を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the comparison of the space | interval of two leaf crests. 潮位変化とクレスト有無・高さの検討結果を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the examination result of a tide level change, the existence of crest, and height. 従来の離岸堤の設置模式図である。It is the installation schematic diagram of the conventional breakwater. 従来の人工リーフの設置模式図である。It is the installation schematic diagram of the conventional artificial leaf.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 クレスト型人工リーフ
2 捨石
3 コンクリートブロック
5a,5b クレスト
1 Crest-type artificial leaf 2 Rubble 3 Concrete blocks 5a, 5b Crest

Claims (5)

波浪等によって砂浜侵食や高潮被害を被っている海又は湖沼の沿岸域において、その対策のために施工される保全構造物である人工リーフであって、
多数のコンクリートブロックをその下面の捨石を被覆するように沿岸に沿って所定長さにわたり、かつ所定幅で設置し、該コンクリートブロック体の長さ方向の上面にクレストを水面から突出させて設け、このクレストは、その上面が沖側から岸側に向けて所定の勾配で上向き傾斜したテーパ面と平坦面から形成され、該テーパ面はその勾配がクレストの幅に対して高さが1/3程度となっているとともに、平坦面より大きい面積を有していて、岸向きに流れる強い波浪をテーパ面によって砕波して減波化することを特徴とするクレスト型人工リーフ
An artificial reef that is a conservation structure to be constructed for countermeasures in the coastal area of the sea or lake where sandy beach erosion or storm surge damage is caused by waves, etc.
A large number of concrete blocks are installed over a predetermined length along the coast so as to cover the rubble on the lower surface, and with a predetermined width, and crests are provided on the upper surface in the length direction of the concrete block body so as to protrude from the water surface . The crest is formed of a tapered surface and a flat surface whose upper surface is inclined upward with a predetermined gradient from the offshore side toward the shore side, and the tapered surface has a height that is 1/3 of the width of the crest. A crest-type artificial reef characterized by having an area larger than that of a flat surface and reducing the wave by breaking a strong wave flowing toward the shore with a tapered surface .
クレストは、コンクリートブロック体の長さ方向の上面に幅方向に所定の間隔をおいて複数列設けられている請求項1記載のクレスト型人工リーフThe crest type artificial leaf according to claim 1, wherein the crest is provided in a plurality of rows on the upper surface in the length direction of the concrete block body at a predetermined interval in the width direction. クレストは、平均潮位で水面から0.5m程度突出するように高さが設定されている請求項1又は2記載のクレスト型人工リーフThe crest-type artificial leaf according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the height of the crest is set so as to protrude about 0.5 m from the water surface at an average tide level. クレストは、コンクリートブロックの上面に一体に形成されている請求項1ないしのいずれかに記載のクレスト型人工リーフThe crest type artificial leaf according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein the crest is integrally formed on an upper surface of the concrete block. 沖側からクレストを含むコンクリートブロック及びクレストの両側から岸側に設置されるコンクリートブロックは、これらコンクリートブロックから岸側に設置されるコンクリートブロックよりも大型である請求項1ないしのいずれかに記載のクレスト型人工リーフConcrete block installed on shore side from offshore from both sides of the concrete blocks and crest containing crest, according to any one of claims 1 to 4 from these concrete block is large than concrete block installed on the shore side Crest type artificial leaf .
JP2004076337A 2004-03-17 2004-03-17 Crest artificial leaf Expired - Lifetime JP3876997B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004076337A JP3876997B2 (en) 2004-03-17 2004-03-17 Crest artificial leaf

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004076337A JP3876997B2 (en) 2004-03-17 2004-03-17 Crest artificial leaf

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005264501A JP2005264501A (en) 2005-09-29
JP3876997B2 true JP3876997B2 (en) 2007-02-07

Family

ID=35089339

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004076337A Expired - Lifetime JP3876997B2 (en) 2004-03-17 2004-03-17 Crest artificial leaf

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3876997B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6245285B2 (en) * 2015-03-30 2017-12-13 Jfeスチール株式会社 Artificial shallow or tidal flat
JP6213749B2 (en) * 2015-03-30 2017-10-18 Jfeスチール株式会社 Artificial shallow or tidal flat

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005264501A (en) 2005-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3438349A1 (en) Lost sand collecting apparatus for preventing coastal erosion
US20160115664A1 (en) Fixed type structure unit for restoring lost sand, structure and restoring method
Boehlich et al. The Elbe Estuary
Kraus et al. Coastal barrier breaching, Part 1: Overview of breaching processes
Browder et al. Performance of a submerged breakwater for shore protection
JP2009114636A (en) Wave dissipating structure
JPS61294009A (en) Protective apparatus wherein energy disipating element is mounted on bank
JP3876997B2 (en) Crest artificial leaf
Burcharth et al. Types and functions of coastal structures
KR102025654B1 (en) Submerged breakwater type fish reef
Negro et al. Action strategy for studying marine and coastal works with climate change on the horizon
JP4602094B2 (en) Sand drift control structure
Soliman et al. Shoreline changes due to construction of Alexandria submerged breakwater, Egypt
Gysens et al. Integrated coastal and maritime plan for Oostende-design of soft and hard coastal protection measures during the EIA procedures
Lazar et al. COASTAL MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE “VOORDELTA”, THE CONTIGUOUS EBB-TIDAL DELTAS IN THE SW NETHERLANDS
Popesso Evolution and stability of tidal inlets: a comparison between two natural cases along human-affected coastlines
Thorenz Coastal flood defence and coastal protection along the North Sea coast of Niedersachsen
Promngam et al. Effect of Jetties in Coastal Change at Chumphon Estuary
Benassai et al. Coastal storm damage reduction program in Salerno Province after the winter 2008 storms
Ranganathan et al. Alternative long term durable coastal protection methods for a moderately eroding Odisha coast
Rambabu et al. A Review on Methodologies to Upgrade the Coastal Structures to Enhance the Coastal Resilience
Gordon Canute's dilemma-adapting to the forces of nature
Morton Effects of Coastal Structures on Shoreline Stabilization and Land Loss- The Texas Experience
Padron et al. NY/NJ Outer Harbor Gateway
Davis et al. Wetland shoreline protection and erosion control: Design considerations

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060523

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060705

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060926

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20061024

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 3876997

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091110

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101110

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111110

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111110

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121110

Year of fee payment: 6

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131110

Year of fee payment: 7

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131110

Year of fee payment: 7

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131110

Year of fee payment: 7

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131110

Year of fee payment: 7

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term