JP3656043B2 - Negotiation support system and method for trading market of stocks, securities, products, etc. - Google Patents

Description

[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a negotiation support system and method for supporting negotiation for closing a contract in a trading market for stocks, securities, commodities, and the like.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In recent years, a computer system has been introduced as a means for combining each transaction party's transaction requests (orders) in a trading market for stocks, securities, products, and the like. Although it is called “electronic market”, in this electronic market system, as a general rule, if the order of a trading party who wants to deal with each other matches, the transaction is automatically established or the transaction is established. The function to make the transaction party confirm this is realized.
[0003]
On the other hand, in actual transactions, if some conditions are different, negotiations may lead to the conclusion of the contract, so the automatic transaction establishment function alone will not activate the transaction in the electronic market. .
[0004]
Regarding this problem, as a technique for realizing a negotiation function in an electronic market system, a negotiation verification system as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. 8-507171 (see Japanese Patent Application No. 10-504409) is known. This is to transmit a negotiation message between a plurality of parties to negotiate transaction conditions. As an example of the transmission of the negotiation message, a free interactive format is disclosed.
[0005]
Further, in an electronic market system using a computer, transmission of a negotiation message between a plurality of parties can be realized by using, for example, a known electronic bulletin board system, electronic mail system, and electronic chat system. .
[0006]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, these technologies all transmit negotiation messages as message texts (regardless of format) and display them as messages on the other party's display device in the order in which they occur, so that message exchange is repeated. Thus, past messages are sequentially erased from the display device or disappear from the visual sense of the parties by the scroll function. That is, only a message transmission technique is disclosed.
[0007]
For this reason, the following problems have arisen.
(1) In order to input a negotiation message, all negotiation conditions must be input from the keyboard, which makes the input operation complicated.
(2) In the case where a negotiation condition that matches the condition of the other party is selected from among a plurality of negotiation conditions that are sequentially added and presented, the listability is lacking.
(3) When correcting or canceling negotiation conditions, not only is the input complicated, but the latest conditions are difficult to understand.
(4) When negotiating with a plurality of opponents at the same time, it is difficult to determine which conditions are advantageous because the listability is lacking.
[0008]
An object of the present invention is to provide a negotiation support system and method in a trading market which can solve the problems in the conventional technology as described above.
[0009]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
  According to the present invention, in a negotiation support system for supporting negotiation for contract conclusion in a transaction market, a transaction processing computer connected to terminals of a plurality of transaction parties via a communication line is provided. Includes at least identification information for associating order data and / or negotiation condition data input from the terminals of each transaction party and identifying the transaction party, identification information for identifying the order data, and negotiation conditions. Transaction information storage means for recording together with identification information for identifying this, and negotiations on the same transaction with a plurality of parties are at least subject to negotiation based on each information stored in the transaction information storage means Information indicating the status of order data, information indicating the status of negotiations, information identifying the party or terminal, and transactions Negotiation control means for generating a negotiation process between a plurality of independent parties constituted by information to be identified, and the negotiation status between a plurality of parties for the same transaction as a negotiation screen having a list on one screen A negotiation screen control means for displaying on the terminal of the party, and a contract execution means for performing the contract establishment process based on a signal instructing the contract establishment process using the negotiation condition determined from the negotiation control means as a transaction condition The negotiation control means, when a negotiation condition is inputted from a party of negotiation, stores the negotiation condition in the transaction information storage means in association with a negotiation process, and the execution means Has the same identification information as the identification information for identifying the order data for which the contract is executed when the contract in the specific negotiation process is executed Detects the negotiations process, negotiation support system and performs termination processing of negotiation is provided.
[0010]
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the negotiation screen having the list property is in a table format.
[0011]
According to another embodiment of the present invention, when there are a plurality of negotiation requests for one transaction, the negotiation screen control means sends the negotiation request to the terminal of the transaction party that is the target of the negotiation request. Negotiation screen displayed on the terminal of each of the transaction parties who have made the negotiation request, while the displayed negotiation screen can list the negotiation status with the transaction parties who have made the plurality of negotiation requests. Does not display the negotiation status of the other party who made the negotiation request.
[0012]
According to still another embodiment of the present invention, the negotiation screen control means is a transaction that has made the plurality of negotiation requests on a negotiation screen displayed on a terminal of a transaction party that is a target of the negotiation request. Each negotiation status with the parties is displayed in a form that can be easily distinguished from each other.
[0021]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Next, based on an accompanying drawing, the present invention is explained in detail about an embodiment and an example of the present invention.
[0022]
The embodiments and examples of the present invention described in detail below are examples of a system that performs unsecured call transactions, but the present invention is not limited to the unsecured call transactions, It can be applied to various trading systems such as various products such as stocks and oils. In addition, when a transaction instruction (order information) from a transaction party is input to the system, the system normally performs matching of the opposing order information and tries to close the transaction. In the negotiation support system and method of the invention, in order to make the transaction more flexible and to facilitate smooth execution of the contract, the negotiation conditions are separate from the automatic establishment of the contract when the transaction party inputs the order information. The negotiation support system supports negotiation between both parties by identifying the conditions.
System configuration
A negotiation support system as an embodiment of the present invention is connected to a computer terminal of a transaction party through a network, and processes a transaction processing computer (transaction processing server) and a transaction party that process transactions between the parties in real time and / or batch processing. Communication means for receiving transaction instruction information such as order data transmitted from the computer terminal via the network and transmitting negotiation data to the terminal. The negotiation support system has a function for executing a contract in order to execute the execution of the transaction for which the negotiation has been completed as a matter of course, which is realized by a transaction processing computer. This transaction processing computer is configured to be connectable to a network such as the Internet, and the connection method and the type of network are not limited. Although connection via the Internet using TCP / IP is conceivable, it is also possible to connect via a dedicated line with higher speed and higher safety.
[0023]
FIG. 1 schematically shows the configuration of the negotiation support system as described above, and FIG. 2 shows the overview of the configuration of the transaction processing computer. As schematically shown in these drawings, a transaction processing computer 10 showing a main part of the negotiation support system is connected to a network 1 such as a public line, a dedicated line, etc. via a communication means 20, and further, a transaction party. Connected to the computer terminal 30. As this communication means 20, a communication modem or the like is generally known. However, when connecting to an open network such as the Internet, in addition to a communication device such as a modem, a network connection server is used. However, it is conceivable to increase security. Although it looks like a wired connection in the figure, communication by a wireless system is also possible, and a communication device such as a communication modem may be changed according to the communication system.
[0024]
As schematically shown in FIG. 2, the transaction processing computer 10 has a function of realizing a contract execution means 11, a negotiation control means 12, a negotiation screen control means 13, and a timer means 14 in this system. ing. Further, in FIG. 2, the transaction processing computer 10 is shown to be connected to the transaction information storage means (negotiation condition storage means) 15, but this transaction information storage means 15 is provided inside the transaction processing computer 10. It may be present, and records transaction information to be negotiated entered by a transaction party. Of course, the transaction information storage means 15 also records transaction information that is not the subject of the present invention, but that does not need to be negotiated and is intended only for the automatic execution. When transaction information with negotiation conditions is input by a transaction party, the negotiation conditions are also recorded.
System operation, function and operation
Hereinafter, the operation, function, and operation of the negotiation support system having the above-described configuration will be described in order.
(1) Input of transaction information
Trading party A inputs his / her desired transaction instruction = order data from his / her terminal 30 connected to the transaction processing computer 10 via the network 1.
[0025]
At this time, if the transaction party wishes to establish a contract through negotiation in place of automatic contract establishment and / or instead of automatic contract establishment, a negotiation condition (negotiation data) is added to the order data. Negotiation conditions are urged to be entered by a trading party through an input screen as shown in FIG. 3, for example.
[0026]
The order number appearing on the input screen in FIG. 3 indicates the original order data to which the negotiation condition is added, and is assigned so that the order data can be uniquely identified in the processing in the transaction processing computer 10. It has been done. The input screen of FIG. 3 is an example in which order data is input once and then negotiation conditions (negotiation condition data or negotiation data) are input. It is also possible to configure the screen so that
[0027]
FIG. 4 shows an example structure of such order data, and FIG. 5 shows an example structure of negotiation data.
(2) Transaction data transmission
When order data with negotiating conditions is input and transmitted to the transaction processing computer 10 at the transaction party A, the transaction processing computer 10 receives this and enters the order data registration step. The transaction processing computer 10 stores the transmitted transaction data in the transaction information storage means 15 as information of one transaction data 1 table. At this time, the order data is recorded together with the identifiable identification information. Data for identifying that the order data is subject to negotiation conditions is also recorded.
[0028]
The data for identifying that the negotiation condition is attached is preferably, for example, a field indicating whether or not the negotiation condition exists in the order data record, and an arbitrary parameter for the field. In the data structure illustrated in FIG. 4, the data structure is described by “◯”, but is not limited to such a symbol.
[0029]
The negotiation condition data may be recorded in the same record as the order data as information accompanying the order data, or one negotiation condition data may be recorded as one record separately from the order data. In the case of recording separately, it is desirable that it is possible to identify which negotiation condition data corresponds to which order data by recording the identification information of the order data in association with the negotiation conditions.
[0030]
Furthermore, since a plurality of negotiation conditions may be indicated for one order data, the negotiation condition data is configured so that a plurality of related negotiation conditions can be recorded. It is desirable that the data be correlated.
(3) Display of order data with negotiation conditions
When there is an input of order data, the transaction processing computer 10 generates terminal display information based on the content and transmits it to each terminal. Other transaction parties can grasp the transaction status in the market by displaying the order data transmitted in this way on their terminal 30.
[0031]
Although there is no direct relationship with the present invention, there is no room for negotiation with respect to order data, that is, order data that is only intended for automatic execution, the transaction processing computer 10 stores the order data at the same time. When it is detected whether there is an order that can be matched, and when an order that can be automatically executed is detected, the execution process of the execution is performed without displaying the order data on the terminals of other trading parties. If order data subject to garnishing is displayed on the screen of the terminal, the order data is locked to prevent acceptance of negotiations or negotiation requests from other trading parties at the stage of garnishing. It is desirable to perform processing and delete from the display on the screen when the contract is established.
[0032]
When transaction data with a negotiation condition is input, the transaction processing computer 10 uses a method that can be distinguished from the order data that has been automatically executed so that the transaction party can easily understand that the order data has a transaction condition. Generate display data. For example, a display color or a display font may be changed, or a symbol indicating that a negotiation condition is attached may be added.
(4) Negotiations started
FIG. 6 is a display example of transaction data displayed on the terminal screen of the transaction party by the transaction processing computer 10. This display example is of a so-called laminating plate type. For example, in the example of FIG. 6, the transaction data with negotiation conditions is configured such that white numbers are displayed on a black background. If a trading party sees transaction data with negotiation terms of “20” (for example, 2 billion yen) at a rate of 0.84 and wishes to initiate a negotiation, for example, the trading party To select the cell portion “20” at a rate of 0.84 on the screen.
[0033]
Identification information that can identify the selected order data is associated with the cell, and the terminal 30 sends information to the transaction processing computer 10 that there is a negotiation request for the transaction data represented in the cell. Send. The transaction processing computer 10 can specify transaction data to be negotiated based on the identification information.
[0034]
When the transaction processing computer 10 identifies the transaction party that has made the negotiation request and the transaction party that has input the transaction data to be negotiated, the transaction processing computer 10 generates a negotiation screen by the realization function of the negotiation screen control means 13, Displayed on the terminal 30 of the transaction party.
[0035]
FIG. 7 shows an example of such a negotiation screen. This negotiation screen is configured to reflect the negotiation of the trading party in real time, and the negotiation message (negotiation content) input by one of the trading parties depends on the realization function of the negotiation control means 12 in the transaction processing computer 10. Controlled and configured to update the negotiation screen of both parties.
[0036]
What is important here is the configuration of the negotiation screen and the control method of the negotiation message. In the prior art, the negotiation message is handled only as message data, and the computer system that mediates the transaction relays the message text or the fixed text transmitted from the transaction party to the terminal of the negotiation partner. (That is, merely providing a communication line for private communication). For this reason, negotiation messages are displayed in chronological order on the terminal screen of each transaction party. Then, when the negotiations were finalized, the transaction conditions under which the negotiations were made were entered, and the contract was made.
[0037]
In contrast to the conventional mere message mediation, in the negotiation support system according to the present invention, a negotiation screen having a list as shown in FIG. In addition, the parties to the negotiation can enter the negotiation conditions with a simple operation and, for example, can also handle complicated negotiation methods such as presenting multiple conditions and allowing the other party to select. I have to.
(5) Negotiation control
In order to enable negotiation as described above, the negotiation support system according to the present invention is configured to perform the following control by using the negotiation control unit 12 based on the information in the negotiation condition storage unit 15. Yes.
5-1. Negotiation process
One negotiation is generally conducted between the two parties. This negotiation is controlled by the negotiation control means 12 as a negotiation process between the two parties. Here, an example of the control is shown. In the negotiation control means 12, one negotiation is managed as one negotiation process. This negotiation process includes various information required for negotiation between two parties, including information on the parties to be negotiated, the status of the order data being negotiated, the status of the negotiation, and the time information necessary for monitoring the negotiation timeout. Consists of information, and based on this information, the negotiation between the two parties is controlled.
5-2. Negotiations between multiple parties
Although one negotiation is conducted between two parties, a plurality of negotiations can be established for one transaction. In other words, the application for negotiation for a specific transaction with negotiation conditions is configured to be accepted from a plurality of parties. For example, suppose that three parties B, C, and D apply for negotiation data with negotiation conditions entered by a transaction party A, and negotiate between AB, A-C, and A-D. Will be performed in parallel.
[0038]
If it demonstrates using said negotiation process, each negotiation between AB, between A-C, and AD will be managed and controlled as an individual negotiation process, respectively. In addition, since each said negotiation process is attached to the order with the specific negotiation conditions which the transaction party A performed, it is desirable to be comprised so that it may mutually relate, and when one negotiation is materialized More preferably, the other remaining negotiations are configured to end.
5-3. Negotiation screen control
In the prior art, negotiations between A-B, A-C, and A-D are displayed on independent negotiation screens, and are handled as separate negotiations on the system.
[0039]
On the other hand, in the present invention, even when a plurality of parties apply for negotiations for a specific transaction with negotiation conditions, the party A who has input the transaction subject to the negotiation The terminal is configured so that the negotiation status with the parties B, C, D can be listed on one screen. On the other hand, in the negotiation screen of each party B, C, D who applied for negotiation, the negotiation status of the other party who applied for negotiation is not displayed. In this case, on the negotiation screen displayed on the terminal of the transaction party A, for example, by displaying each party B, C, D in different colors, it is possible to list negotiations of a plurality of parties B, C, D In the negotiation screen of the transaction parties B, C, and D, only the negotiation status with the transaction party A is displayed.
[0040]
In this way, it is possible to negotiate the same transaction with multiple parties while ensuring independent negotiations between the two parties. An example of this specific implementation method is schematically shown in FIG. In FIG. 8, each of negotiation process 1, negotiation process 2, and negotiation process 3 is preferably organized in an object-oriented manner.
[0041]
Each negotiation process controls the negotiation independently. However, when generating the negotiation screen data for each party, the information for identifying the party or terminal and the information for identifying the transaction are used to generate the same negotiation screen data. Transaction negotiations can be done on a single negotiation screen.
[0042]
In this way, when negotiations between a plurality of parties are performed in the process in which negotiations of a plurality of parties are performed concurrently for the same transaction, the agreement is concluded through the function of the execution means 11 The negotiation control means 12 detects a negotiation process having the same identification information as the identification information of the transaction for which the negotiation has been established, and performs a negotiation termination process. Preferably, it is desirable to display a message for aborting the negotiation for the parties to the negotiation and then close the negotiation screen.
5-4. Data related
Negotiation conditions handled in the negotiation process are stored in the negotiation condition storage means 15 as negotiation data. When a negotiation process is generated by a negotiation request, the negotiation process records the party information, the identification information of the order data to be negotiated, and data about the initial negotiation conditions associated with the order data. The
[0043]
In the negotiation process, when a new negotiation condition is input from the negotiating party, the negotiation process associates the negotiation condition with the negotiation process and records it in the negotiation condition storage unit 15.
[0044]
Further, when a change (correction) has been made with respect to a negotiation condition that has already been input, the negotiation process specifies the negotiation data that has been changed, and the negotiation data in the negotiation condition storage means 15 is identified. Make changes.
[0045]
In this way, the negotiation data in the negotiation condition storage means 15 are associated with each other through the negotiation process. Therefore, in the negotiation process, when a negotiation is established for a specific negotiation condition (negotiation data), the negotiation process can delete other related negotiation conditions (negotiation data).
5-5. Agreement on specific negotiation conditions within the same negotiation process
As described above, the negotiation party can present a plurality of negotiation conditions in the negotiation = negotiation process for one order data. The plurality of negotiation conditions are recorded in the negotiation condition storage unit 15 in association with a specific negotiation process. By the way, while a plurality of negotiation conditions are presented in this way, the trading party can establish a contract under specific negotiation conditions.
5-6. Explanation of negotiation screen
The negotiation screen does not simply display a negotiation message in the message window, but represents the negotiation status in a tabular form with a list as described above with reference to FIG. That is, the negotiation conditions input by the parties are not transmitted as simple text information to the other party as they are, but are generated as negotiation screen information suitable for each negotiation party by the negotiation screen control means 13, and are displayed in real time in table format. Provided in.
5-7. Negotiations completed
When the negotiation condition desired by the user is presented, the transaction party selects the portion on which the condition is displayed on the negotiation screen by using a pointing device or the like and then approves the condition. Thereby, the negotiation control means 12 sends a signal to the execution means 11 so as to execute the contract establishment process using the confirmed negotiation condition as a transaction condition.
[0046]
Preferably, when the negotiation conditions are confirmed by both parties, the negotiation process that controls the negotiation for which the confirmation has been performed is as follows: Based on the above, control to execute the transaction agreement.
[0047]
Based on the control, the contract execution means 11 specifies the target order data and the contract conditions, and executes the contract execution processing.
5-8. Negotiation confirmation function
When the negotiation is successful, there is a possibility that the other party agrees with the negotiation condition before the change even though the condition is changed by one party. In such a case, the parties should confirm that the conditions have been changed, and the following modification is provided as one form of the present embodiment.
[0048]
In the negotiation process, for example, data related to time such as the time when the negotiation condition is input or the time when it is recorded is managed. Note that the data managed here may be information that can determine the context by comparing two pieces of information, for example, serial numbers, even if it does not relate to time.
[0049]
When negotiation starts between the parties and the negotiation process is generated, the time-related data is managed in the negotiation process, and the negotiation between the parties controlled by the negotiation process allows the parties to negotiate, such as changing the negotiation conditions. If there is any status change, the data related to the time managed in the negotiation process is updated with the data related to the time such as the time when the change occurred.
[0050]
When the negotiation data is transmitted to the terminal 30 of the party, the data related to the time managed by the negotiation process is also transmitted. When the party selects a specific negotiation condition displayed on the negotiation screen of the terminal 30 and performs an operation to agree, the identification information of the negotiation data and the time of the negotiation data received on the terminal side Since the data is transmitted to the transaction processing computer 10, the negotiation process compares the data related to the time transmitted from the terminal with the data related to the current time of the negotiation data to be agreed.
[0051]
If the result of the comparison is that they are the same, an agreement is established, and if the transmitted time data is earlier than the current time data in the negotiation process, the negotiation process is, for example, Since you agreed with the conditions before the change, either confirm the agreement with the conditions before the change, or because the conditions have been changed, control to determine whether to agree with the conditions after the change. You should do it.
[0052]
When the transaction processing computer 10 receives a signal regarding the confirmation or confirmation of agreement from the terminal, the transaction processing computer 10 performs agreement processing regarding negotiation.
[0053]
As described above, the information managed in the negotiation process is not limited to data related to time and the like, but may be a serial number every time there is a status change such as 001 and 002, for example.
[0054]
The time-related data is recorded under the control of the transaction processing computer 10 at the time when the negotiation conditions are input and recorded in the transaction information storage means, transferred when the negotiation process is generated, and thereafter managed in the negotiation process. You may comprise.
5-9. Negotiation control means
The negotiation control means 12 controls each negotiation by the negotiation process, and controls the relationship between the order data to be negotiated and each negotiation process. If the order data is canceled or the contents of the order data are corrected or changed, the cancellation, change or correction must be reflected in the negotiation process related to the order, or the negotiation process must be terminated as necessary. I must. On the other hand, when the negotiation by the negotiation process is completed and the contract is executed with the contents agreed by the parties, it is necessary to invalidate the order data that has been subject to the negotiation process. The negotiation control means 12 has a function of controlling the order data and the negotiation process related to each other as described above.
(6) Timeout function
In this embodiment, the start time and the end time can be determined as negotiation conditions. The restrictions on the negotiation time are managed in the negotiation process, and the timeout of the negotiation process is controlled in conjunction with the timer means 14 realized by the transaction processing computer 10.
[0055]
Timeout here means the end of forced negotiation based on time conditions. When the negotiation process detects that the negotiation process has timed out based on the time by the timer means, the negotiation process notifies the parties to the negotiation completion of the negotiation due to the timeout, and performs termination processing.
[0056]
Here, an example of managing timeout in the negotiation process has been shown, but the timer means 14 manages timeout information for each negotiation process in association with the negotiation process, and based on the clock function of the transaction processing computer 10, It may be configured to monitor the timeout of each negotiation process. In this case, when the timer means 12 detects that a certain negotiation process has timed out, it notifies the relevant negotiation process that the timeout has occurred. The negotiation process performs a negotiation termination process based on the transmitted information.
(7) Negotiation condition check function
In the present invention, the transaction party visually grasps the negotiation conditions desired by itself, and determines whether or not the status of the negotiations carried out by itself belongs to the category of the negotiation conditions desired by itself. In addition, a negotiation condition check function is further provided.
[0057]
In the present invention, in order to provide such a negotiation condition check function, a trading party can input his / her negotiation range (allowable transaction condition range). In this embodiment, the negotiation range is specified based on various conditions relating to transactions such as quantity (amount) and unit price (rate). In this embodiment, these specified conditions are defined using functions.
[0058]
The defined function is associated with the negotiation process related to the negotiation conducted by the trading party, and the current negotiation status can be calculated based on the function and reflected in the negotiation condition check function. .
[0059]
The negotiation condition check function is configured so that the negotiation range can be displayed using a graph using the function so that it can be visually easily performed. For example, the graph format may be two-dimensional or three-dimensional, but is not limited thereto. Preferably, it is desirable to configure a complex function composed of a plurality of elements so that it can be expressed in three dimensions, so that it is easy for the trading party to visually grasp the negotiation range.
[0060]
FIG. 9 shows an example of a contract condition chart definition diagram (straight line designation) as one example of such a graph display. This screen example shows two-dimensional coordinates (0.25, 4) (P1), (0.25, 8) called (Rate, Amount) by a mouse connected to the terminal of a trading party who makes a private order (OFFER) ) (P2), (0.24, 22) (P3) is an example in which a straight line is drawn by pointing at three points. The coordinates are also displayed in the input coordinate dialog, where it is possible to directly correct the rate and amount. If corrected, the chart is automatically updated and drawn. The contract condition chart definition diagram in Fig. 9 assumes that the bank is the source of funds from the premise, and hopes to OFFER 400 million to 2.2 billion funds, and the rate also assumes a range of 0.25 to 0.24 It means that
[0061]
FIG. 10 shows a screen example of a contract condition chart definition diagram (range specification) as another example of the graph display. In this screen example, when the transaction party who makes the own order (OFFER) puts the mouse connected to his terminal on P1-P2, the cursor changes to vertical scaling, so if you drag the rate to 0.24, this state Then, it becomes the area of P1-P2-P3-P4, and further, the area of P1-P2-P3-P7-P6-P5-P4 was automatically created by clicking P5, P6, P7 with the mouse. It is an example. This area defines a desired range between the self-order rate and the amount as OFFER. In the case of self-ordering, this area is considered desirable. The area above the designated area is an advantageous area for the OFFER side, and the area below the designated area represents an unfavorable area.
[0062]
FIG. 11 shows an example where the order status on the BID side is displayed in real time (black circles) with respect to the contract condition chart definition diagram of FIG. In FIG. 11, a black circle A indicates an order of a trading party A on the BID side. Similarly, a black circle B indicates an order of the trading party B, and a black circle C indicates an order of the trading party C. In the figure, a black circle D indicates an order of the trading party D, a black circle E indicates an order of the trading party E, and a black circle F indicates an order of the trading party F. In the example of FIG. 11, it is obvious that only the order of the trading party D is within the area range.
[0063]
Orders (new, correction, cancellation) can be made from this chart. Plotting 1.4 billion above 0.26, which is unlikely to fill a self-order (sun sign), creates a new order. On the other hand, when a new order is generated by a regular order, it is displayed on the garnish board, and at the same time, it is plotted with sun marks on the chart. At this time, it is clear that the self-order (sun mark) is not within the condition range defined by the bank.
[0064]
FIG. 12 shows an example in which index values are displayed on the order display of FIG. In this example, two index values are automatically calculated and displayed. The top row shows the degree of deviation from the area in rate units (positive / negative: negative is disadvantageous for the bank). In the lower row, the rate divergence in the upper row is multiplied by the amount (100 million units). For example, when determining which of the disadvantageous conditions is the order of trading party C or trading party E is relatively advantageous, the lower index value indicates that C is −3.96 and E is −10.0. Therefore, E can be judged to have a larger lost profit.
[0065]
As described above, the status of the negotiation updated in real time by the transaction party is displayed on the terminal screen of the transaction party by the negotiation condition check function. Depending on the negotiation range represented by the graph and the position of the current negotiation status displayed on the graph, the trading party can easily determine whether the current negotiation conditions are within or outside the negotiation range. It is possible to make a judgment, and it is possible to easily confirm the negotiation status.
[0066]
As a result, there was a possibility that the transaction contents agreed as a result of the negotiations would be disadvantageous as compared with the transaction contents that the customer assumed in advance, but always grasp the position of the negotiations. So that there will be no judgment mistakes.
[0067]
In the above description, the negotiation is performed in real time. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the negotiation can be configured to be applied for.
[0068]
【The invention's effect】
According to the present invention, since a negotiation screen having a list is provided in negotiation for conclusion of a contract in a transaction market, it becomes possible for a party to perform negotiation to input negotiation conditions with a simple operation, It is also possible to easily cope with complicated negotiation methods such as presenting a plurality of conditions and allowing the other party to select. It is also easy to correct or cancel negotiation conditions. Furthermore, even when negotiating with a plurality of opponents simultaneously, since it is a list, it is easy to determine which conditions are advantageous.
[0069]
It is also easy to conduct negotiations between multiple parties simultaneously.
[0070]
It is possible to easily have a negotiation confirmation function, and even if the conditions are changed by one party, the other party will conclude a contract while agreeing to the negotiation conditions before the change. The possibility can be eliminated.
[0071]
A time-out function can be provided to easily terminate a forced negotiation based on time conditions.
[0072]
Since it is possible to easily have a negotiation condition check function that allows the transaction party to visually grasp the negotiation condition desired by the transaction party, the transaction party can always easily grasp its own negotiation position, Mistakes in judgment can be eliminated.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing a configuration of a negotiation support system according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an outline of a configuration of a transaction processing computer in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an input screen displayed on each terminal of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a structure example of order data.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a structure example of negotiation data.
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a display example of transaction data displayed on a terminal screen of a transaction party by a transaction processing computer.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a negotiation screen displayed on a terminal of a transaction party.
FIG. 8 is a diagram schematically illustrating an example of a negotiation process between a plurality of parties for one transaction.
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of displaying a negotiation range using a graph.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating another example of displaying a negotiation range using a graph.
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating still another example in which the negotiation range is displayed using a graph.
FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating still another example in which the negotiation range is displayed using a graph.
[Explanation of symbols]
1 network
10 Transaction processing computer
11 Execution means
12 Negotiation control means
13 Negotiation screen control means
14 Timer means
15 Transaction information storage means
20 Communication means
30 terminals

Claims (4)

  In a negotiation support system for supporting negotiation for closing a contract in a transaction market, the transaction support computer includes a transaction processing computer connected to terminals of a plurality of transaction parties via a communication line, and the transaction processing computer includes at least each transaction Identification information for associating order data and / or negotiation condition data input from a terminal of the party with each other and identifying the transaction party, identification information for identifying the order data, and identification information for identifying the negotiation condition The transaction information storage means for recording together with the transaction information storage means, and the negotiation of the same transaction with a plurality of parties, based on each information stored in the transaction information storage means, at least indicates the status of the order data subject to negotiation Information, information indicating the status of negotiations, information identifying the party or terminal, and information identifying the transaction The negotiation control means for generating a negotiation process between a plurality of independent parties configured as described above, and the negotiation status with a plurality of parties for the same transaction as a negotiation screen having a list on one screen The negotiation screen control means for displaying on the terminal and the execution means for executing the contract based on the signal for instructing the execution of the contract using the negotiation condition determined from the negotiation control means as a transaction condition are realized. The negotiation control means stores the negotiation conditions in the transaction information storage means in association with the negotiation process when the negotiation conditions are inputted from the parties to the negotiation, and is specified by the execution means. If the negotiation process is executed, the negotiation process having the same identification information as the identification information for identifying the order data for which the execution has been executed is detected. Negotiation support system, characterized in that to, the termination process of negotiation.   The negotiation support system according to claim 1, wherein the negotiation screen having the list property is in a table format.   When there are a plurality of negotiation requests for one transaction, the negotiation screen control means displays the plurality of negotiation requests on the negotiation screen displayed on the terminal of the transaction party that is the target of the negotiation request. It is possible to list the status of negotiations with the trading party that has made, but the negotiation screen displayed on each terminal of the trading party that made the negotiation request displays the The negotiation support system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the negotiation status is not displayed.   In the negotiation screen displayed on the terminal of the transaction party that is the target of the negotiation request, the negotiation screen control means can easily identify each of the negotiation statuses with the transaction party that has made the plurality of negotiation requests. The negotiation support system according to claim 3, wherein the negotiation support system is configured to be displayed in the form.

Images