JP3129967B2 - How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet - Google Patents

How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet

Info

Publication number
JP3129967B2
JP3129967B2 JP08164677A JP16467796A JP3129967B2 JP 3129967 B2 JP3129967 B2 JP 3129967B2 JP 08164677 A JP08164677 A JP 08164677A JP 16467796 A JP16467796 A JP 16467796A JP 3129967 B2 JP3129967 B2 JP 3129967B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
scale
steel sheet
water
hot
rolled steel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP08164677A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0970611A (en
Inventor
建太 苅部
二彦 中川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP08164677A priority Critical patent/JP3129967B2/en
Publication of JPH0970611A publication Critical patent/JPH0970611A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3129967B2 publication Critical patent/JP3129967B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、熱延鋼板のスケー
ル除去方法に関し、特に、高Si鋼において赤スケール
の少ない表面性状の良好な熱延鋼板を製造する技術に係
わる。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for removing scale from a hot-rolled steel sheet, and more particularly to a technique for producing a hot-rolled steel sheet having low red scale and good surface properties in high Si steel.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】熱延鋼板の製造にあたっては、素材スラ
ブを酸化性雰囲気の加熱炉に挿入し、通常1100〜1
300℃の温度域で数時間加熱した後、熱間圧延する。
この加熱時に生成した1次スケール及び加熱炉から抽出
後に生成する2次スケールが、いわゆるデスケーリング
において十分に除去されずに圧延されると、該スケール
が製品である鋼板表面に食い込み、スケール疵となって
残る。このスケール疵は、該鋼板の表面性状を著しく損
なうと共に、曲げ加工時にクラック発生の起点となるた
め、製品品質に重大な影響を及ぼす。特に、Si(シリ
コン)含有量の多い鋼種においては、加熱炉内の高温酸
化に際してSiが選択酸化を受け、熱可塑性の大きいフ
ァイアライト(2FeO・SiO2 )をつくり、それが
地鉄界面に複雑に入り組んだサブスケール層を形成する
ため、1次スケールの剥離性が著しく低下する。そし
て、除去されずに取り残された高Si鋼のスケールは、
その後の圧延によって破壊されて粉末化し、赤スケール
又は線状スケールと呼ばれるスケール欠陥となって鋼板
表面に残るのである。
2. Description of the Related Art To manufacture a hot-rolled steel sheet, a raw material slab is inserted into a heating furnace in an oxidizing atmosphere, and usually 1100-1.
After heating at a temperature of 300 ° C. for several hours, hot rolling is performed.
If the primary scale generated during this heating and the secondary scale generated after extraction from the heating furnace are rolled without being sufficiently removed in the so-called descaling, the scale will bite into the surface of the product steel sheet, causing scale flaws. It remains. The scale flaws significantly impair the surface properties of the steel sheet and also serve as starting points for cracks during bending, and thus have a significant effect on product quality. In particular, in a steel type having a high Si (silicon) content, Si is selectively oxidized during high-temperature oxidation in a heating furnace, thereby producing firelite (2FeO.SiO 2 ) having high thermoplasticity, which is complicated at a ground iron interface. Since a complicated subscale layer is formed, the peelability of the primary scale is significantly reduced. And the scale of the high Si steel left without being removed is
It is destroyed by the subsequent rolling and becomes powder, and remains as a scale defect called a red scale or a linear scale on the steel sheet surface.

【0003】この問題の解決手段としては、以下の方法
が考えられる。 (1)スラブ表面に酸化防止材を塗布する(特開平1−
249214号公報)。 (2)スラブの加熱温度をファイアライトの融点(約1
170℃)以下にする(特開昭55−110727号公
報、特公昭58−1167号公報)。 (3)完全無酸化状態で圧延を行う(特公昭60−15
684号公報)。 (4)圧延前の温度、圧延中の温度を高温(約1000
℃以上)にする。 (5)生成したスケールの完全なスケール除去を行う。
The following method is conceivable as a means for solving this problem. (1) Apply an antioxidant to the slab surface
249214). (2) Set the heating temperature of the slab to the melting point of firelite (about 1
170 ° C.) or lower (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 55-110727, Japanese Patent Publication No. 58-1167). (3) Rolling in a completely non-oxidized state (Japanese Patent Publication No. 60-15 / 1985)
684). (4) The temperature before rolling and the temperature during rolling are set to a high temperature (about 1000
℃ or more). (5) Complete scale removal of the generated scale is performed.

【0004】しかしながら、上記(1)〜(4)の方法
には、それぞれ以下の欠点がある。 (1)は、煩雑な塗布作業が増えるのみならず、処理剤
に費用がかかり、製造コストが高くなる。 (2)は、低温で圧延するため、圧延機の負荷が増大す
ると共に、鋼種によっては材料特性を確保する観点か
ら、適用できない規格が存在する。 (3)は、設備コストが莫大になるので、現実的でな
い。 (4)加熱炉から高温で抽出となるため、熱量原単位が
増加し、スケールロスが増大する。
However, the above methods (1) to (4) have the following disadvantages. In the case of (1), not only a complicated coating operation is increased, but also a processing agent is expensive and a manufacturing cost is high. In (2), since rolling is performed at a low temperature, the load on the rolling mill increases, and there are standards that cannot be applied depending on the type of steel from the viewpoint of securing material properties. (3) is not realistic because the equipment cost is enormous. (4) Since extraction is performed at a high temperature from the heating furnace, the calorific value increases, and the scale loss increases.

【0005】一方、(5)の方法に関しては、水の噴射
圧力から衝突圧を推定する式を基にして赤スケールの発
生しない衝突圧を決定する方法(特開平6−31571
3号公報)、PやSiのwt%から赤スケールの発生し
ない水の衝突圧を決定する方法(特開平6−19043
3号公報)、さらには、鋼板表面に達した高圧水の衝突
エネルギーを算出して、赤スケールの発生しない衝突エ
ネルギーが与えられる条件でスケール除去を行う方法
(特開平6−114432号公報)などが開示されてい
る。
On the other hand, with respect to the method (5), a method for determining a collision pressure at which no red scale occurs based on an equation for estimating the collision pressure from the water injection pressure (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 6-31571).
No. 3), a method of determining the collision pressure of water that does not generate red scale from the wt% of P and Si (JP-A-6-19043)
No. 3) and a method of calculating the collision energy of high-pressure water that has reached the surface of the steel sheet and removing the scale under conditions that provide collision energy that does not generate red scale (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 6-114432). Is disclosed.

【0006】しかしながら、鋼の成分や噴射圧力のみか
ら水の衝突圧を決定する方法では、理論的根拠が不明確
な式を用いているため、噴射形状や噴射距離が変化した
場合に、その推定式をそのまま適用できないという問題
がある。また、水の衝突エネルギーに基づき高Si鋼の
スケール除去条件を決定する方法は、Si成分や加熱条
件が異なる場合に、鋼材からのスケール剥離難度の変化
を考慮していない問題点がある。
However, in the method of determining the collision pressure of water only from the steel composition and the injection pressure, an equation whose theoretical basis is unclear is used. There is a problem that the expression cannot be applied as it is. In addition, the method of determining the scale removal conditions of high Si steel based on the collision energy of water has a problem in that when the Si component and the heating conditions are different, the change in the difficulty of scale peeling from the steel material is not considered.

【0007】[0007]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は、かかる事情
を鑑み、水の噴射形状や噴射距離が変化した場合でも適
用できる理論的根拠のある衝突圧の決定式を用い、ま
た、鋼材のSi成分や加熱条件が異なっても、鋼材から
のスケール剥離難度を配慮して、水使用量に無駄がな
く、効率の良いスケール除去を行える熱延鋼板のスケー
ル除去方法を提供することを目的としている。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above circumstances, the present invention uses a collision pressure determination formula having a theoretical basis that can be applied even when the water injection shape or the injection distance changes, It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for removing the scale of a hot-rolled steel sheet, which can efficiently remove scale without wasting water consumption, considering the difficulty of scale peeling from steel material even if the components and heating conditions are different. .

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】発明者は、上記目的を達
成するため鋭意研究し、噴射水のスケール除去能力が鋼
板表面に対するその総衝撃力(F)だけでなく、単位衝
撃力(S)も配慮する必要があると確信した。一方、鋼
材側には、鋼材成分や加熱条件に依存したスケールの剥
離難易度が存在するので、噴射水のスケール除去能力と
鋼材側のスケール剥離難易度を比較して、スケール除去
条件を設定すべきと考え、本発明を創案するに至った。
Means for Solving the Problems The inventor of the present invention has made intensive studies to achieve the above object, and has found that the dewatering capacity of the jet water is not only the total impact force (F) on the steel sheet surface but also the unit impact force (S). Also convinced that we needed to consider. On the other hand, on the steel side, there is a scale separation difficulty that depends on the steel material composition and heating conditions.Therefore, the scale removal conditions are set by comparing the scale removal capacity of the jet water with the scale separation difficulty on the steel side. The present invention was invented.

【0009】すなわち、本発明は、水を噴射して熱延鋼
板のスケールを除去するに際し、噴射水のスケール除去
能力(B1)及び熱延鋼板のスケール剥離難度(B2)
を下記式で定め、 B1=f1 (F、S、T) B2=f2K,R) at R=100 B1>0とするSの条件下で、B2<B1を満足させる
ようなスケール除去条件で水を噴射することを特徴とす
る熱延鋼板のスケール除去方法である。
That is, according to the present invention, when water is sprayed to remove the scale of a hot-rolled steel sheet, the scale removal capability of the sprayed water (B1) and the scale peeling difficulty of the hot-rolled steel sheet (B2)
B1 = f 1 (F, S, T) B2 = f 2 ( K, R) at R = 100 A scale that satisfies B2 <B1 under the condition of S where B1> 0. This is a method for removing scale from a hot-rolled steel sheet, which comprises injecting water under removal conditions.

【0010】ここで、 F:鋼板表面での噴射水の総衝
撃力[N] F=f3 (D、P0 ) …(1) S:鋼板表面での噴射水の単位衝撃力[Pa] S=f4 (P0 、D、L、β) …(2) T:スケール除去時間[sec] R:スケール剥離率[%] また、本発明は、熱延鋼板のSi含有量を0.1wt%
以上とし、噴射水の鋼板面への衝撃条件をF>240
[N]で、且つS>0.2×106 [Pa]以上とする
ことを特徴とする熱延鋼板のスケール除去方法でもあ
る。
Here, F: total impact force of spray water on the steel sheet surface [N] F = f 3 (D , P 0 ) (1) S: unit impact force of spray water on the steel sheet surface [Pa] S = f 4 (P 0 , D, L, β) (2) T: Scale removal time [sec] R: Scale exfoliation rate [%] In the present invention, the Si content of the hot-rolled steel sheet is set to 0.1%. 1wt%
As described above, the impact condition of the jet water on the steel sheet surface is F> 240
[N] and S> 0.2 × 10 6 [Pa] or more.

【0011】さらに、本発明は、上記噴射水のスケール
除去能力(B1)及び熱延鋼板のスケール剥離難度(B
2)を、下記の(3)〜()式で行うことを特徴とす
るの熱延鋼板のスケール除去方法でもある。
Further, the present invention relates to a method for removing the scale (B1) of the jet water and the scale peeling difficulty (B) of the hot-rolled steel sheet.
The method for removing the scale of a hot-rolled steel sheet is characterized in that 2) is performed by the following equations (3) to ( 5 ).

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明では、水を噴射して熱延鋼
板のスケールを除去するに際し、噴射水のスケール除去
能力(B1)及び熱延鋼板のスケール剥離難度(B2)
を下記式で定め、 B1=f1 (F、S、T)、及びB2=f2K,R)
at R=100 B1>0とするためのSの条件を定め、このSの条件下
で、B2<B1を満足させるようなスケール除去条件で
水を噴射するようにしたので、F及びSで決定されるデ
スケーリング能力と、鋼種や加熱条件で決定されるスケ
ール剥離難易度を同じ指標で評価することができるよう
になる。したがって、鋼種や加熱条件が変化した場合に
も、スケール除去を完全にするために必要なFとSを的
確に決定することができるようになる。その結果、熱延
鋼板の製造においてスケール疵の発生が最小の設備条件
で安定して防止できるようになり、さらに、F,Sの絶
対値とデスケールに係わる各種パラメータ、水の流量Q
[m3 /s],水滴の粒子径D[m],噴射圧力P0
[Pa],噴射距離L[m],噴射形状を考慮した係数
β[−]等との関係が定量化され、デスケーラの設計が
容易になる。さらに加えて、本発明では、水使用量に無
駄がなく効率の良いスケール除去が可能になる。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS In the present invention, when water is sprayed to remove the scale of a hot-rolled steel sheet, the scale removal capability of the sprayed water (B1) and the scale peeling difficulty of the hot-rolled steel sheet (B2)
B1 = f 1 (F, S, T) and B2 = f 2 ( K, R)
at R = 100 The condition of S for satisfying B1> 0 was determined, and under this condition of S, water was jetted under the scale removal condition satisfying B2 <B1. The descaling ability to be performed and the scale peeling difficulty determined by the steel type and heating conditions can be evaluated using the same index. Therefore, even when the steel type and the heating conditions change, it becomes possible to accurately determine F and S necessary for complete scale removal. As a result, in the production of a hot-rolled steel sheet, the occurrence of scale flaws can be stably prevented under the minimum equipment conditions, and further, the absolute values of F and S, various parameters related to descale, and the flow rate of water Q
[M 3 / s], particle diameter D [m] of water droplet, injection pressure P 0
The relationship among [Pa], the injection distance L [m], the coefficient β [-] in consideration of the injection shape, and the like is quantified, and the design of the descaler becomes easy. In addition, the present invention enables efficient scale removal without wasting water usage.

【0013】ここで、 F:鋼板表面での噴射水の総衝
撃力[N] F=f3 (D、P0 ) …(1) S:鋼板表面での噴射水の単位衝撃力[Pa] S=f4 (P0 、D、L、β) …(2) T:スケール除去時間[sec] R:スケール剥離率[%] また、本発明では、熱延鋼板のSi含有量を0.1wt
%以上とし、噴射水の鋼板面への衝撃条件をF>240
[N]で、且つS>0.2×106 [Pa]以上とする
ようにして、鋼板表面からのスケール除去を可能とし、
必要なFとSの選定により高Si鋼からのスケール除去
を完全にした。
Here, F: total impact force of spray water on the steel sheet surface [N] F = f 3 (D , P 0 ) (1) S: unit impact force of spray water on the steel sheet surface [Pa] S = f 4 (P 0 , D, L, β) (2) T: Scale removal time [sec] R: Scale exfoliation rate [%] In the present invention, the Si content of the hot-rolled steel sheet is set to 0.1%. 1wt
% And the impact condition of the sprayed water on the steel sheet surface is F> 240.
[N] and S> 0.2 × 10 6 [Pa] or more to enable scale removal from the steel sheet surface,
The selection of necessary F and S completed the scale removal from the high Si steel.

【0014】以下、図1に基づき、本発明の内容を補足
する。まず、鋼板面への水噴射に関し、図1に示す水滴
モデルを仮定して、上記(1)及び(2)式の噴射水の
総衝撃力(F)と単位衝撃力(S)を下記のように求
め、(1)’式及び(2)’式に具体化した。
Hereinafter, the contents of the present invention will be supplemented with reference to FIG. First, regarding the water injection to the steel plate surface, assuming the water drop model shown in FIG. 1, the total impact force (F) and the unit impact force (S) of the jet water of the above equations (1) and (2) are calculated as follows. And embodied in equations (1) ′ and (2) ′.

【0015】[0015]

【数4】 (Equation 4)

【0016】[0016]

【数5】 (Equation 5)

【0017】その(1)’、(2)’式を用いると、各
種パラメータ(例えば、流量、水滴の粒子径、噴射圧
力、スプレー距離、スプレー形状等)に基づいたデスケ
ーラのスケール除去能力、つまりFとSの定量化が可能
となる。なお、(1)’及び(2)’式で用いるパラメ
ータは、図1に示すものの他、ρは水滴密度[kg/m
3 ]、αは水滴の粒子が板に当たる時の衝突面積を考慮
した係数[−]、tは衝撃波が水滴の中を伝わる時間
(液滴の直径/音速)であり、Cは音速[m/s]であ
る。
Using the formulas (1) ′ and (2) ′, the descaler's scale removal capability based on various parameters (for example, flow rate, droplet diameter, spray pressure, spray distance, spray shape, etc.), Quantification of F and S becomes possible. The parameters used in the expressions (1) ′ and (2) ′ are those shown in FIG. 1 and ρ is the water droplet density [kg / m
3 ], α is a coefficient [−] in consideration of the collision area when the droplet of the water hits the plate, t is the time for the shock wave to propagate through the droplet (droplet diameter / sonic speed), and C is the sound speed [m / s].

【0018】次に、噴射水のスケール除去能力B1は、
高温鋼板と似た塑性変形を示すアルミ供試材を用いて、
予め、F、S、Tと供試材の単位面積あたりの壊食量
(水を噴射した時の質量減量(デスケ前板重量−デスケ
後の板重量)B[10-3g/mm2 ])との関係を定量
化し、(3)式を得た。
Next, the scale removal capability B1 of the jet water is
Using aluminum specimens that show plastic deformation similar to high-temperature steel sheets,
In advance, the erosion amount per unit area of F, S, T and the test material (weight loss when water is sprayed (weight of plate before deske-weight of plate after deske) B [10 -3 g / mm 2 ]) Was quantified to obtain equation (3).

【0019】[0019]

【数6】 (Equation 6)

【0020】本発明では、この壊食量Bを、デスケーラ
噴射水のスケール除去能力の評価指数B1として定める
ことにした。続いて、鋼材側のスケール剥離難度B2で
あるが、上記壊食量Bと赤スケール剥離率Rが直線関係
にあり、その直線の傾きKが鋼材の加熱条件(加熱時
間、加熱温度、加熱炉内雰囲気O2 濃度)とSi濃度、
及びスケール除去時間Tにより変化することを実験で見
いだし、(4)及び、(5)式を得た。
In the present invention, the erosion amount B is determined as the evaluation index B1 of the descaler injection water scale removal ability. Subsequently, regarding the scale peeling difficulty B2 on the steel material side, the erosion amount B and the red scale peeling rate R are in a linear relationship, and the slope K of the straight line indicates the heating conditions (heating time, heating temperature, heating furnace temperature) of the steel material. Atmosphere O 2 concentration) and Si concentration,
It was found by experiments that the value changed with the scale removal time T, and the expressions (4) and (5) were obtained.

【0021】[0021]

【数7】 (Equation 7)

【0022】[0022]

【数8】 (Equation 8)

【0023】ここで、 Ti:加熱時間[min]、T
e:加熱温度[℃]、Si:鋼材Si濃度[wt%]、
2 :加熱炉内雰囲気O2 濃度[%]。そして、本発明
では、(5)式においてR=100[%]を満たす壊食
量Bを鋼材のスケール剥離難度B2として用いることに
定める。よって、本発明は、上記B1とB2を比較し、
B1>B2をスケール除去の基本条件として、加熱条件
(加熱時間、加熱温度、加熱炉内雰囲気O2 濃度)と鋼
材Si濃度別に、赤スケール完全除去に必要なFとSを
決定し、スケール除去を行うようにしたのである。
Here, Ti: heating time [min], T
e: heating temperature [° C], Si: steel material Si concentration [wt%],
O 2 : atmosphere O 2 concentration [%] in the heating furnace. In the present invention, the erosion amount B satisfying R = 100 [%] in the equation (5) is determined to be used as the scale peeling difficulty B2 of the steel material. Therefore, the present invention compares the above B1 and B2,
With B1> B2 as the basic conditions for scale removal, F and S required for complete red scale removal are determined according to heating conditions (heating time, heating temperature, atmosphere O 2 concentration in the heating furnace) and steel Si concentration, and scale removal. It was done.

【0024】なお、本発明は、熱延鋼板のSi含有量を
0.1wt%以上とし、噴射水の鋼板面への衝撃条件を
F>240[N]で、且つS>0.2×106 [Pa]
以上の条件下で使用することが、最も好ましい。その理
由は、F≦240又はS≦0.2×106 [Pa]の領
域では、アルミ供試材の壊食が起こらず、従ってSi鋼
において赤スケールを除去することが不可能だからであ
る。
In the present invention, the Si content of the hot-rolled steel sheet is set to 0.1 wt% or more, the condition of the impact of the injection water on the steel sheet surface is F> 240 [N], and S> 0.2 × 10 6 [Pa]
It is most preferable to use under the above conditions. The reason is that in the region of F ≦ 240 or S ≦ 0.2 × 10 6 [Pa], erosion of the aluminum test material does not occur, and therefore, it is impossible to remove red scale from Si steel. .

【0025】[0025]

【実施例】Si含有量が、それぞれ0.1、0.5及び
1.6wt%含有するSi鋼の熱延に、本発明に係る熱
延鋼板のスケール除去方法を適用した。まず、デスケー
ラとしては、前記(1)’及び(2)’式を用いてFと
Sの関係を定め、その関係がそれぞれ異なる4バンク構
造にした。つまり、水を噴射するノズル・ヘッダをライ
ンの上流から下流に4列に配置した。具体的には、上流
側から、#1バンクがF=240[N],S=0.10
×106[Pa],#2バンクがF=400[N],S
=0.81×106[Pa],#3バンクがF=480
[N],S=1.5×106[Pa],#4バンクがF
=960[N],S=1.93×106[Pa]の仕様
とした。
EXAMPLES The hot-rolled steel sheet descaling method according to the present invention was applied to hot-rolling of Si steels having Si contents of 0.1, 0.5 and 1.6 wt%, respectively. First, as the descaler, the relationship between F and S was determined using the above equations (1) ′ and (2) ′, and a four-bank structure having different relationships was used. That is, four rows of nozzle headers for injecting water were arranged from upstream to downstream of the line . Specifically, from the upstream side, bank # 1 has F = 240 [N] and S = 0.10
× 10 6 [Pa], # 2 bank F = 400 [N], S
= 0.81 × 10 6 [Pa], bank # 3 has F = 480
[N], S = 1.5 × 10 6 [Pa], # 4 bank is F
= 960 [N] and S = 1.93 × 10 6 [Pa].

【0026】次に、単位壊食量Bを、前記したアルミニ
ウム供試材で30秒間壊食を行って求め、上記各バンク
に(3)式を適用してB1を決めた。そのB1は、図2
の下側において、各バンクのF,S値より立ち上げた垂
直線(点線)が、横軸(単位アルミ壊食量)と交わる交
点で表わされる。一方、実操業においては、鋼材の加熱
条件とSi含有量別に、デスケーラの使用パターンを変
えて操業している。そこで、鋼材の加熱条件を一定とし
て、Si含有量別に赤スケールの完全除去に必要な
(F)と(S)とを決定した一例を表1に示す。そし
て、表1の各種Si鋼のSi濃度、加熱条件、及び任意
のスケール剥離率Rを(4)及び(5)式に代入し、R
=100%を満たす壊食量(鋼材側のスケール剥離難
度)を求め、それをB2とする。そのB2の一例を図2
の上側に示す。つまり、図のSi含有量の異なる3つの
直線の最上端(R=100%に相当)より前記横軸に垂
直線を降ろし、該横軸との交点がB2となる。
Next, the unit erosion amount B was determined by erosion for 30 seconds with the above-mentioned aluminum test material, and B1 was determined by applying equation (3) to each of the above banks. The B1 is shown in FIG.
On the lower side , a vertical line (dotted line) raised from the F and S values of each bank is represented by an intersection that intersects the horizontal axis (amount of aluminum erosion). On the other hand, in the actual operation, the operation is performed by changing the use pattern of the descaler according to the heating condition and the Si content of the steel material. Therefore, Table 1 shows an example in which the heating conditions of the steel material are fixed and (F) and (S) necessary for complete removal of the red scale are determined for each Si content. Then, the Si concentrations, heating conditions, and arbitrary scale peeling rates R of the various Si steels in Table 1 are substituted into equations (4) and (5), and R
= Amount of erosion that satisfies 100% (hardness of scale peeling on the steel material side) is obtained, and is defined as B2. FIG. 2 shows an example of the B2.
Is shown above. That is, a vertical line is drawn down from the uppermost end (corresponding to R = 100%) of three straight lines having different Si contents in the figure to the horizontal axis, and the intersection with the horizontal axis is B2.

【0027】[0027]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0028】従って、図2に基づけば、B1>B2を満
足するデスケール条件は明らかになる。具体的には、
0.1%Si鋼では、#2バンクのみ、0.5%Si鋼
では、#3バンクのみ、1.6%Si鋼では、#4バン
クのみを用いて操業すれば、赤スケールを完全に除去で
きることがわかる。また、図2の関係を(1)’,
(2)’式と合わせて考察すると、スケール除去能力を
向上させるためには、水量Q、噴射圧力P0 を増加させ
るか、あるいは水滴径Dを減少させる方が有利である
し、噴射圧力P0 の増加は、前記FとSを同時に増加さ
せることができるため、スケール除去能力を向上する上
で最も有利であることも判った。しかし、実用上では、
該P0 の増加はランニング・コストの増大につながるの
で、Fの確保には、まず鋼材の温度低下を考慮した上
で、水量Qを増加させる方針を優先すべきであり、Sの
確保には、まず水の噴射距離Lを短くする方針を優先す
べきである。
Therefore, based on FIG. 2, the descaling condition satisfying B1> B2 becomes clear. In particular,
With 0.1% Si steel, only # 2 bank, with 0.5% Si steel, only # 3 bank, and with 1.6% Si steel, using only # 4 bank, complete red scale It can be seen that it can be removed. Further, the relationship of FIG.
Considering the equation (2) ′, it is more advantageous to increase the water amount Q and the injection pressure P 0 or to reduce the water droplet diameter D in order to improve the scale removal ability. It has also been found that an increase of 0 is the most advantageous in improving the scale removing ability because the F and S can be increased simultaneously. However, in practice,
Since the increase in P 0 leads to an increase in running cost, in order to secure F, a policy of increasing the water amount Q should be given priority in consideration of the temperature drop of the steel first. First, the policy of shortening the water injection distance L should be given priority.

【0029】上記本発明に係るスケール除去方法を採用
してからの熱延鋼板の赤スケール剥離率と、従来の操業
方法による前記剥離率とを比較し、その一例を図3に示
す。対象鋼板は、Si含有量が1.6wt%で、本発明
の適用では#4バンクを使用したが、従来法ではスケー
ル除去能力が低い#1バンク程度に相当するデスケーラ
を使用した。図3に示すように、従来赤スケール剥離率
が80%以下の鋼板が90%あったものが、2%と大幅
に低減され、表面品質が格段に向上した。
FIG. 3 shows a comparison between the red scale peeling rate of a hot-rolled steel sheet after adopting the scale removing method according to the present invention and the peeling rate obtained by a conventional operation method. The target steel sheet had a Si content of 1.6 wt% and used # 4 banks in the application of the present invention. However, in the conventional method, a descaler corresponding to about # 1 bank having a low scale removing ability was used. As shown in FIG. 3, 90% of the steel sheets had a red scale peeling rate of 80% or less, which was significantly reduced to 2%, and the surface quality was significantly improved.

【0030】[0030]

【発明の効果】以上述べたように、本発明により、噴射
水の鋼板への衝突圧F及び単位衝突圧Sで決定されるス
ケール除去能力と、鋼種や加熱条件で決定される鋼板側
のスケール剥離難易度を同じ指標で評価することができ
るようになり、鋼種や加熱条件が変化した場合にも、ス
ケールを十分に除去できるようになった。その結果、熱
延鋼板の製造において安定したスケール疵の防止が可能
になった。
As described above, according to the present invention, the scale removal capacity determined by the impact pressure F and the unit impact pressure S of the jet water on the steel sheet and the scale on the steel sheet side determined by the steel type and heating conditions The difficulty of peeling can be evaluated with the same index, and scale can be sufficiently removed even when the steel type or the heating conditions change. As a result, stable scale flaws can be prevented in the production of a hot-rolled steel sheet.

【0031】また、上記F及びSの絶対値とスケール除
去条件Q、D、P、L、βとの関係が定量化されている
ため、スケール除去装置の設計が容易になった。
Since the relationship between the absolute values of F and S and the scale removal conditions Q, D, P, L, and β is quantified, the design of the scale removal device is facilitated.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】噴射水によるスケール除去における水滴の鋼板
への衝突モデルを示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a model of collision of water droplets on a steel plate in scale removal by jet water.

【図2】赤スケール剥離率R、噴射水の総衝撃力(F)
及び単位衝撃力(S)間の関係を示す図である。
FIG. 2 Red scale peeling rate R, total impact force of spray water (F)
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a relationship between the unit impact force and the unit impact force (S).

【図3】本発明の実施による赤スケール防止効果を説明
する図である。
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a red scale prevention effect according to an embodiment of the present invention.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 平6−71330(JP,A) 特開 平6−114432(JP,A) 特開 平7−144213(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) B21B 45/08 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (56) References JP-A-6-71330 (JP, A) JP-A-6-114432 (JP, A) JP-A-7-144213 (JP, A) (58) Field (Int.Cl. 7 , DB name) B21B 45/08

Claims (3)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】水を噴射して熱延鋼板のスケールを除去す
るに際し、 噴射水のスケール除去能力(B1)及び熱延鋼板のスケ
ール剥離難度(B2)を下記式で定め、 B1=f1(F、S、T) B2=f2K,R) at R=100 B1>0とするSの条件下で、B2<B1を満足させる
ようなスケール除去条件で水を噴射することを特徴とす
る熱延鋼板のスケール除去方法。 ここで、 F:鋼板表面での噴射水の総衝撃力[N] F=f3 (D、P0 ) …(1) S:鋼板表面での噴射水の単位衝撃力[Pa] S=f4 (P0 、D、L、β) …(2) T:スケール除去時間[sec] R:スケール剥離率[%]
When removing the scale of a hot-rolled steel sheet by injecting water, the scale removal capability (B1) of the sprayed water and the scale peeling difficulty (B2) of the hot-rolled steel sheet are determined by the following equation: B1 = f 1 (F, S, T) B2 = f 2 ( K, R) at R = 100 Under the condition of S where B1> 0, water is jetted under scale removal conditions that satisfy B2 <B1. Method for removing scale from hot-rolled steel sheet. Here, F: total impact force of spray water on the steel sheet surface [N] F = f 3 (D , P 0 ) (1) S: unit impact force of spray water on the steel sheet surface [Pa] S = f 4 (P 0 , D, L, β) (2) T: Scale removal time [sec] R: Scale peeling rate [%]
【請求項2】 熱延鋼板のSi含有量を0.1wt%以
上とし、噴射水の鋼板面への衝撃条件をF>240
[N]で、且つS>0.2×106 [Pa]以上とする
ことを特徴とする請求項1記載の熱延鋼板のスケール除
去方法。
2. The hot rolled steel sheet has a Si content of 0.1% by weight or more, and the condition of impact of the injection water on the steel sheet surface is F> 240.
2. The method for removing scale from a hot-rolled steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein [N] and S> 0.2 × 10 6 [Pa] or more.
【請求項3】 上記噴射水のスケール除去能力(B1)
及び熱延鋼板のスケール剥離難度(B2)を、数式
(3)〜()で行うことを特徴とする請求項1又は2
の熱延鋼板のスケール除去方法。 【数1】 【数2】 【数3】 ここで、 Ti:加熱時間[min]、Te:加熱温度
[℃]、Si:鋼材Si濃度[wt%]、O2 :加熱炉
内雰囲気O2 濃度[%]。
3. The descaling ability of the jet water (B1).
The scale peeling difficulty (B2) of the hot-rolled steel sheet is calculated by the equations (3) to ( 5 ).
For removing hot-rolled steel sheet scale. (Equation 1) (Equation 2) (Equation 3) Here, Ti: heating time [min], Te: heating temperature [° C.], Si: steel material Si concentration [wt%], O 2 : atmosphere in heating furnace O 2 concentration [%].
JP08164677A 1995-06-30 1996-06-25 How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet Expired - Fee Related JP3129967B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP08164677A JP3129967B2 (en) 1995-06-30 1996-06-25 How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7-166238 1995-06-30
JP16623895 1995-06-30
JP08164677A JP3129967B2 (en) 1995-06-30 1996-06-25 How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0970611A JPH0970611A (en) 1997-03-18
JP3129967B2 true JP3129967B2 (en) 2001-01-31

Family

ID=26489689

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP08164677A Expired - Fee Related JP3129967B2 (en) 1995-06-30 1996-06-25 How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3129967B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012081716A1 (en) 2010-12-14 2012-06-21 Jfeスチール株式会社 Nozzle for removing scale of steel plate, scale removing device for steel plate, and method for removing scale of steel plate
WO2012101932A1 (en) 2011-01-26 2012-08-02 Jfeスチール株式会社 Nozzle for descaling steel plate, device for descaling steel plate, and method for descaling steel plate

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102914174A (en) * 2012-10-16 2013-02-06 南京钢铁股份有限公司 Furnace dredging method for avoiding accretion on furnace bottom roller of non-oxidation heat treatment furnace

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012081716A1 (en) 2010-12-14 2012-06-21 Jfeスチール株式会社 Nozzle for removing scale of steel plate, scale removing device for steel plate, and method for removing scale of steel plate
US9321084B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2016-04-26 Jfe Steel Corporation Descaling nozzle for removing scale from steel sheet, descaling apparatus for removing scale from steel sheet, and descaling method for removing scale from steel sheet
WO2012101932A1 (en) 2011-01-26 2012-08-02 Jfeスチール株式会社 Nozzle for descaling steel plate, device for descaling steel plate, and method for descaling steel plate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0970611A (en) 1997-03-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3129967B2 (en) How to remove scale from hot rolled steel sheet
JP3872609B2 (en) Hot rolling method for high Si steel
JP3994582B2 (en) Steel sheet descaling method
JP3231698B2 (en) Manufacturing method of hot rolled steel sheet with excellent surface properties
JP3296374B2 (en) Descaling method during hot rolling of austenitic stainless steel
JP3882465B2 (en) Method for producing hot-rolled steel sheet with good surface properties
JP3802848B2 (en) Hot rolling method for Si-containing steel sheet
JP4035117B2 (en) Hot rolling method for high Si content steel sheet with good surface properties
JP2853559B2 (en) Descaling method in hot rolling
JP4144567B2 (en) Manufacturing method of hot-rolled steel sheet
JP3425017B2 (en) Manufacturing method of hot rolled steel sheet
JP2900765B2 (en) Steel descaling method
JP3985401B2 (en) Steel sheet rolling method
JPH1177142A (en) Production of hot rolled stainless steel plate
JP3774686B2 (en) Descaling method in hot rolling
JP2672392B2 (en) Method for manufacturing thin-scale hot-rolled steel sheet
JPH11267739A (en) Production of hot rolled steel sheet
JP2785639B2 (en) Method for preventing hot-rolled scale flaws on Si-containing steel sheet
JP2002316206A (en) Shape excellent in surface property, steel for the shape, and method and device for manufacturing them
JP3422890B2 (en) Manufacturing method of hot rolled steel sheet
JPH06114432A (en) Manufacture of high silicon hot rolled steel sheet
JP3422891B2 (en) Manufacturing method of hot rolled steel sheet
JPH0751732A (en) Hot rolling method of steel sheet with superior surface property
JPH11156407A (en) Manufacture of hot rolled steel sheet excellent in surface quality
JP2863407B2 (en) Manufacturing method of stainless steel sheet with few surface defects

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20001031

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071117

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081117

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091117

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101117

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111117

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111117

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121117

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131117

Year of fee payment: 13

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees